請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/29264
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 陳思寬 | |
dc.contributor.author | Huang-Miao Liu | en |
dc.contributor.author | 劉皇妙 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T01:03:34Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2015-05-25 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2010-05-25 | |
dc.date.issued | 2007 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2007-07-23 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 一、中文文獻
王泓仁,2005,「台幣匯率對我國經濟金融活動之影響」,『中央銀行季刊』,27卷,1期,13-46。 李燕萍,2004,「東亞地區貨幣整合的可能性研究」,西安交通大學,打字複印。 李藍珍,1995,「貨幣學派之匯率決定模型-台灣之共積實證分析」,碩士論文,淡江大學財務金融研究所。 沈中華,1995,「貨幣對產出的敏感性檢定-SVAR-VECM模型的應用」,『台灣銀行季刊』,16卷,4期,71-95。 林慶治,1992,「經濟波動之探討:臺灣SVAR模型實證分析」,碩士論文,中興大學經濟學研究所。 高崇銘,2002,「實質匯率和產出的關係-台灣地區的動態實證分析」,碩士論文,東吳大學經濟學研究所。 張家豪,1998,「金融危機與貨幣政策一致性之實證研究」,碩士論文,中興大學企業管理學系研究所。 張貴欣,2005,「以向量自我迴歸模型探討美國與主要貿易國家之股價、利率及匯率的關聯性研究」,碩士論文,南華大學管理科學研究所。 陳建宏,2000,「臺灣匯率之名目衝擊與實質衝擊」,碩士論文,臺北大學經濟學研究所。 黃宇凡,2006,「貨幣政策與外匯幹預對匯率的影響」,碩士論文,台灣大學經濟學研究所。 黃翠蘭,1992,「我國貨幣政策反應函數之決定-兼論匯率之影響」,碩士論文,中興大學經濟研究所。 楊奕農,2005,『時間序列分析-經濟與財務上之應用』,臺北:雙葉書廊。 劉苓媺,1993,「新台幣對美元匯率決定之實証研究--共整合分析方法的應用」,碩士論文,政治大學經濟學研究所。 蔡妮娜,1994,「小型開放經濟體系匯率制度與貨幣政策效果之分析-SVAR模型對台灣之應用」,碩士論文,國立成功大學政治經濟學研究所。 蔡嫚書,2005,「中央銀行外匯幹預行為之研究」,碩士論文,東吳大學國際貿易研究所。 謝孟錡,2004,「實質匯率波動之因素 - 區域性之比較分析」,碩士論文,中山大學中山學術研究所。 謝欣翰,2002,「亞洲貨幣單一化與各國貿易之關聯性研究 —以向量自我迴歸模型為例」,碩士論文,中原大學企業管理研究所。 魏志耀,1992,「台灣地區貨幣政策指標之實證研究-共整合與結構化向量自我 迴歸之實證研究」,碩士論文,淡江大學金融研究所。 二、英文文獻 Artis, M. and M. Ehrmann, 2006. “The exchange rate-A shock-absorber or source of shocks? A study of four open economies,” Journal of International Money and Finance, 25(6): 874-893. Bagliano, F.C., C.A. Favero, and F. Franco, 1999. “Measuring monetary policy in open economies, ” CEPR Discussion Paper 2079. Bayoumi, T. and B. Eichengreen, 1997. “Ever Closer to Heaven? An Optimum Currency Area Index for European Countries, ” European Economic Review, 41(3): 761-770. Bernanke, B.S. and A.S. Blinder, 1992. “The Federal Funds Rate and the Channels of Monetary Transmission, ” American Economic Review, 82(4): 901-922. Bernanke, B.S. and I. Mihov, 1998. “The liquidity effect and long run neutrality, ” Carnegie-Rochester Conference on Policy Series, 49, 149-194. Bernanke, B.S., 1986. “Alternative explanations of Money-Iincome Correlation, ” Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 25, 49-100. Blanchard, O. and D. Quah, 1989. “The Dynamic Effects of Aggregate Demand and Supply Disturbances, ” American Economic Review, 79(4): 655-673. Brischetto, A. and G. Voss, 1999. “A Structural Vector Autoregression Model of Monetary Policy in Australia, ” Research Discussion Paper, Reserve Bank of Australia, Sydney, 1-55. Burbidge, J. and A. Harrison, 1985. “Accounting for the impact of fluctuations U.S. variable on the Canadian economy, ” Canadian Journal of Economics, 18(4): 784-798. Canzoneri, M., J. Valles, and J. Vinals, 1996. “Do Exchange Rates Move to Address International Macroeconomic Imbalances? ” CEPR Discussion paper 1498. Christiano, L.J. and M. Eichenbaum, 1992. “Liquidity effects and the monetary transmission mechanism, ” American Economic Review, 82, 346-353. Christiano, L.J., M. Eichenbaum, and C. Evans, 1996. “The effects of monetary policy shocks: evidence from flow of funds, ” Review of Economics and Statistics, 78(1), 16-34. Clarida, R. and J. Gali, 1994. “Sources of Real Exchange Rate Fluctuations: How Important are Nominal Shocks? ” Carnegie Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 41, 1-56. Cushman, D.O. and T. Zha, 1997. “Identifying monetary policy in a small open economy under flexible exchange rate, ” Journal of Monetary Economics, 39(3): 433-448. Eichenbaum, M. and C.L. Evans, 1995. “Some empirical evidence on the effect of shocks to monetary policy on exchange rates, ” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(4): 975-1010. Eichenbaum, M., 1992. “Comments on interpreting the macroeconomic time series facts: the effects of monetary policy, ” European Economic Review, 36, 1001-1011. Faust, J. and J.H. Rogers, 2003. “Monetary policy’s role in exchange rate behavior, ” Journal of Monetary Economics, 104, 205-208. Fung, B.S. and R. Gupta, 1997. “Cash-setting, the call loan rate, and the liquidity effect in Canada, ”Canadian Journal of Economics, 30, 1057-1082. Funke, M., 2000. “Macroeconomic Shocks in Euroland vs. the UK: Supply, Demand, or Nominal? ”Mimeo, University of Hamburg. Gan, W.B. and L.Y. Soon, 2003. “Characterizing the monetary transmission mechanism in a small open economy- the case of Malaysia, ”The Singapore Economic Review, 48(2): 113-134. Gandolfo, G., 1986. International Economics, Springer Verlag. Genberg, H., M.K. Salami, and A. Swoboda, 1987. “The relative important of foreign and domestic disturbances for aggregate fluctuations in the open economy: Switzerland, ” Journal of Monetary Economics, 19, 45-67. Gottschalk, J., 2001. “An introduction into the SVAR methodology: identification, interpretation and limitations of SVAR models, ” Kiel working paper, 1027, 1-42. (Mimeographed. ) Hutchison, M. and C.E. Walsh, 1992. “Empirical evidence on the insulation properties of fixed and flexible rates: the Japanese experience,” Journal of International Economics, 32, 241-263. Kenen, P.B., 1969. “The Theory of Optimum Currency Areas: An Eclectic View,” in Robert A. Mundell and Alexander K. Swoboda (eds), Monetary Problems of the International Economy, Chicago and London, University of Chicago Press, 717-724. Kim, S. and N. Roubini, 1997. “Liquidity and exchange rates in the G-7 countries: evidence from identified VARs, ” New York University. (Mimeographed. ) Kim, S. and N. Roubini, 2000. “Exchange rate anomalies in the industrial countries: A solution with a structural VAR approach,” Journal of Monetary Economics, 45(3):561-586. Kim, S., 1999. “Does monetary policy shocks matter in the G-7 countries? Using common identifying assumptions about monetary policy across countries, ” Journal of International Economics, 47, 871-893. Kim, S., 2001. “Monetary policy, foreign intervention, and the exchange rate in a unifying framework, ” Journal of International Economics, 60, 355-386. Lastrape, W.D. and F. Koray, 1990. “International transmission of aggregate shocks under fixed and flexible exchange rate regimes: United Kingdom, France and Germany, 1959-1985, ” Journal of International Money and Finance, 9, 402-423. Leeper, E.M. and D.B. Gordon, 1991. “In search of the liquidity effect, ” Journal of Monetary Economics, 29, 341-369. Leeper, E.M. and D.B. Gordon, 1994. “The dynamic impacts of monetary policy: an exercise in tentative identification, ” Journal of Political Economy, 102, 1228-1247. Marston, R.C., 1985. “Stabilization Policies in Open Economics,” Handbook of International Economics, edited by R.W. Jones and P.B. Kenen, 2: 859-916. Mckinnon, R.I., 1963. “Optimum Currency Areas,” American Economic Review, 53(4): 717-724. Mundell, R. A., 1961. “A Theory of Optimum Currency Areas, ” American Economic Review, 51: 657-664. Obstfeld, M. and K. Rofoff, 1996. “Foundations of International Macroeconomics, ” MIT Press, 1996. Obstfeld, M., 1985. “Floating exchange rates: experience and prospects, ” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 369-450. Pindyck, R.S. and D.L. Rubinfeld, 1998. Microeconomics, 4th ed , NJ: Prentice-Hall. Pitchford, J.D., 1985. “The insulation capacity of a flexible exchange rate system in the context of external inflation,” Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 87(1): 44-85. Reichenstein, W., 1987. “The impact of money on short term interest rates, ” Economic Inquiry, 25, 67-82. Sims, C.A. and T. Zha, 1995. “Does Monetary Policy Generate Recessions? Using Less Aggregate Price Data to Identify Monetary Policy, ” Yale University. (Mimeographed. ) Sims, C.A., 1980. “Macroeconomics and reality, ” Econometrica, 48(1): 1-48. Sims, C.A., 1992. “Interpreting the Macroeconomic Time Series Facts: The Effects of Monetary Policy, ” European Economic Review, 36(5): 975-1000. Smets, F., 1997. “Measuring monetary policy shocks in France, Germany and Italy: the role of the exchange rate, ” Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics, 133, 597-616. Strongin, S., 1995. “The identification of monetary policy disturbance: explaining the liquidity puzzle,” Journal of Monetary Economics, 35, 463-497. Thomas, A., 1997. “Is the Exchange Rate a Shock Absorber? The case of Sweden, ” IMF Working Papers 97/176. (Mimeographed. ) | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/29264 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本研究用SVAR模型探討台灣與日本貨幣政策反應函數與匯率制度關係。模型包含國內利率、消費者物價指數、工業生產指數、名目匯率、國外利率五個經濟變數資料,期間從1989年5月到2006年6月,共206筆月資料。利用實證方式檢驗台灣與日本的匯率政策是作為穩定經濟的功能,還是匯率變動即是造成經濟衰退的原因。
實證研究結果發現台灣與美國之間匯率的衝擊是屬於對稱的衝擊,亦即美國利率上升,台灣也跟著升息,我國貨幣政策受到國外經濟變數衝擊的影響較大,因此本國無法用匯率作為吸收國外經濟衝擊,以使經濟穩定。對台灣來說,加入最適貨幣區域放棄匯率政策或貨幣政策這類自主的工具來穩定國內經濟,比利用這些政策工具來維持經濟穩定還來得有效。 對日本而言,與美國之間的匯率衝擊是屬於不對稱的衝擊,日本大部分的匯率變動是由外匯市場所造成的,貨幣政策對供給面衝擊與需求面衝擊的反應顯著。匯率的可以減緩國外的經濟衝擊,隔絕國外衝擊的效果較佳。故對日本來說,擁有獨立的貨幣政策,作為應對國外經濟衝擊的反應工具,對穩定國內經濟是比較有利的。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | The thesis presents a relationship of monetary policy reaction function and exchange rate regime in open economy of Taiwan and Japan using SVAR model. The economic variables of the model are including domestic interest rate, consumer price index, industrial index, nominal exchange rate, and foreign interest rate. The research uses 206 panel data, from 1989:05 to 2006:06 to examine the role of exchange rate as a shock-absorber or source of shocks. The results of the empirical research are summarized as follows:
The shock between Taiwan and United States belongs to symmetric shock. The interest rates of United States and Taiwan respond in the same way to real shock, so foreign monetary policy shock has a great effect on domestic monetary policy. It is little need for the exchange rate to act as a shock-absorber to stabilizing economy. It is effective for Taiwan to join optimal currency area than use exchange rate policy or monetary policy to stabilizing economy. The shocks are idiosyncratic between Japan and United States,so the exchange rate can absorb such shocks. Exchange rate market disturbance resulted in exchange rate variation; the reactions of monetary policy to supply shock and demand shock are influential. For Japan, it is better to have independent of monetary policy and exchange rate policy as shock absorption to stabilize economy. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T01:03:34Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-96-R94724012-1.pdf: 560448 bytes, checksum: 2e385721330ddf6010b327683438d62f (MD5) Previous issue date: 2007 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機與背景 1 第二節 研究目的與方法 2 第三節 章節安排 4 第二章 文獻回顧 5 第一節 貨幣政策的相關文獻研究 5 第二節 匯率對國內經濟影響的相關文獻研究 10 第三節 貨幣區域整合的相關文獻研究 17 第三章 實證模型建立 24 第一節 SVAR模型 25 第二節 變數選擇 28 第三節 實證模型認定條件 31 第四節 計量分析模型設定-估計 34 第五節 變數時間序列資料的處理 36 第六節 研究期間與資料來源 39 第四章 實證結果 40 第一節 模型設定 40 第二節 資料處理 41 第三節 模型實證分析-台灣 42 第四節 模型實證分析-日本 52 第五節 的估計 59 第六節 衝擊反應函數與預測誤差變異分解 60 第五章 結論與建議 66 第一節 研究結論 66 第二節 未來研究方向 70 參考文獻 71 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 匯率變動對開放總體經濟活動之影響-台灣、日本SVAR模型實證分析 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The effect of exchange rate on Open Microeconomic activities: The practical analysis of SVAR model in Taiwan and Japan | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 95-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 萬哲鈺,張銘仁 | |
dc.subject.keyword | SVAR,匯率制度,貨幣區域,開放總體經濟, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | SVAR,Exchange rate System,Currency area,Open Macroeconomics, | en |
dc.relation.page | 76 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2007-07-24 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 國際企業學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 國際企業學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-96-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 547.31 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。