請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/28759
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 蘇國賢 | |
dc.contributor.author | Yi-chun Chang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 張宜君 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T00:21:15Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2007-09-01 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2007-07-31 | |
dc.date.issued | 2007 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2007-07-27 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 英文書目
Andersson, G, K., Hank M. Ronsen, and A. Vikat. 2006. 'Gendering the Family Composition: Sex Preferences for Children and Childbearing in the Nordic Countries.' Demography 43:255-267. Astone, Nan M. and Sarah S. Mclanahan. 1991. 'Family Structure, Parental Practices and High School Completion.' American Sociological Review 56:309-320. Blake, J. 1986. 'Number of Siblings, Family Background, and the Process of Education Attainment.' Sociological Biology. 33:5-21. Blake, Judith. 1981. 'Family Size and the Quality of Children.' Demography 18:421-442. Blau, P. and O. D. Duncan. 1967. The American Occupational Structure. New York: Willey. Brody, C. J. and L. C. Steelman. 1985. 'Sibling Structure and Parental Sex-Typing of Children’s Household Tasks.' Journal of Marriage and Family 45:265-273. Butcher, K. F. and A. Case. 1994. 'The Effect of Sibling Sex Composition on Women's Education and Earnings.' The Quarterly Journal of Economics 109:531-563. Chu, C. Y. Cyrus, Yu Xie, and Rouh-rong Yu Yu. 2007. 'Effects of Sibship Structure Revisited: Evidence from Intrafamily Resource Transfer in Taiwan.' Sociology of Education 80:91-113. Clark, Shelley. 2000. 'Son Preference and Sex Composition of Children: Evidence from India.' Demography 37:95-108. Colarelli, S. M., J. L. Spranger, and M. R. Hechanova. 2006. 'Women, Power, and Sex Composition in Small Group : An Evolutionary Perspective.' Journal of Organizational Behavior 27:163-184. Conley, Dalton. 2000. 'Sibship Sex Composition: Effects on Educational Attainment.' Social Science Research 29:441-457. Downey, Douglas B. 1995. 'When Bigger Is Not Better: Family Size, Parental Resources, and Children's Educational Performance.' American Sociological Review 60:746-761. Downey, Douglas B., P. B. Jackson, and Brian Powell. 1994. 'Sons versus Daughters: Sex Composition of Children and Maternal View on Socialization.' Sociological Quarterly 35:33-50. Elder, Glen H. JR and Charles E. Bowerman. 1963. 'Family Structure and Child-Rearing Patterns: The Effect of Family Size and Sex Composition.' American Sociological Review 28:891-905. Kaestner, Robert. 1997. 'Are Brothers Really Better? Sibling Sex Composition and Educational Achievement Revisited.' The Journal of Human Resources 32:250-284. Leaper, C., K. J. Anderson, and P. Sanders. 1998. 'Moderator of Gender Effect on Parents’ Talk to their Children: A Meta Analysis.' Development Psychology 34:3-27. Milne, Ann M., David E. Myers, Alvin S. Rosenthal, and Alan Ginsburg. 1986. 'Single Parents, Working Mothers, and the Educational Achievement of School Children.' Sociology of Education 59:125-139. Parish, William L. and Robert J. Willis. 1993. 'Daughters, Education, and Family Budgets Taiwan Experiences.' The Journal of Human Resources 28:863-898. Park, Chia Bin. 1983. 'Preference for Sons, Family Size, and Sex Ratio: An Empirical Study in Korea.' Demography 20:333-352. Powell, Brian and Lala Carr Steelman. 1989. 'The Liability of Having Brothers: Paying for College and the Sex Composition of the Family.' Sociology of Education 62:134-147. —. 1990. 'Beyond Sibship Size: Sibling Density, Sex Composition, and Educational Outcomes.' Social Forces 69:181-206. Raley, Sara, Suzanne Bianchi, Karen S. Cook, and Douglas S. Massey. 2006. 'Sons, Daughters, and Family Processes: Does Gender of Children Matter?' Annual Review of Sociology 32:401-421. Retherford, Robert D. and William H. Sewell. 1991. 'Birth Order and Intelligence: Further Tests of the Confluence Model.' American Sociological Review 56:141-158. StataCorp. 2003a. 'Reference N-R.' in Stata Statistical Software: Release 8.0, edited by StataCorp. Texas: Stata Corporation. —. 2003b. 'User's Guide ' in Stata Statistical Software: Release 8.0, edited by StataCorp. Texas: Stata Corporation. Steelman, Lala Carr and Brian Powell. 1989. 'Acquiring Capital for College: The Constraints of Family Configuration.' American Sociological Review 54:844-855. Stock , H. J and M. W. Watson. 2007. Introduction to Econometrics, Edited by second. Boston: Pearson Education Sudha, S. 1997. 'Family Size, Sex Composition and Children's Education: Ethnic Differentials over Development in Peninsular Malaysia.' Population Studies 51:139-151. Swell, W. H. and R. M. Hauser. 1980. 'The Wisconsin Longitudinal Study of Social and Psychological Factors in Aspirations and Achievements.' in Research in Sociology of Education and Socialization, vol. ed., edited by A. C. Kerckoff. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press. Wooldridge, J. M. . 2003. Introductory Econometrics : A Modern Approach, 2e. Mason: South-Western. Yu, Wei-hsin and Kuo-Hsien. Su. 2006. 'Gender, Sibship Structure, and Educational Inequality in Taiwan: Son Preference Revisited.' Journal of Marriage and Family 68:1057-1068. 中文書目 林大森,2001,〈家庭教育資源對教育分流、教育取得之影響〉,《國立政治大學社會學報》31:45-75。 李婷潔,2007,〈「花木蘭」效應:手足地位對女性學業成就之影響〉,《東吳大學社會學研究所》碩士論文。 陳永欽,2002,〈家庭背景對子女教育成就之影響---台灣實證〉,《國立暨南國際大學經濟學研究所》碩士論文。 謝志龍,2003,〈手足團體、家庭資源與教育程度〉,《東海大學社會學研究所》碩士論文。 李昱瑤,2001,〈家庭結構與教育程度---台灣的實證分析〉,《淡江大學產業經濟研究所》碩士論文。 黃毅志,1995,〈台灣地區教育機會不平等性之變遷〉,《中國社會學刊》18:243-273。 駱明慶,2000,〈教育成就的省籍與性別差異〉,《經濟論文叢刊》29(2):117-151。 李敦仁、余民寧,2005,〈社經地位、手足數目、家庭教育資源與教育成就結構關係模式之驗證:以TEPS資料庫資料為例〉,《台灣教育社會學研究》5(2):1-48。 吳慧瑛,2007,〈家庭背景與教育成就:五個出生世代的比較分析〉,《人口學刊》34:109-143。 陳建志,2000,〈台灣地區科系、職業性別隔離與收入性別差異之變遷〉,《教育與心理研究》23:285-312。 章英華、傅仰止主編,2003,〈台灣地區社會變遷基本調查計劃-第四期第三次調查計劃執行報告〉,中央研究院社會學研究所。 劉正、陳建州,2005,《教育取得之性別差異與流變》,發表於「2005台灣社會學年會台灣社會與社會學反思學術研討會暨90-92社會學門宏觀社會學專題計劃成果發表會」。11月19-20日,台灣台北。 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/28759 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 「手足」結構(sibship configurations)對於教育成就的影響長期以來一直是教育階層化研究關注的重要議題。過去有關手足結構的研究多專注於手足人數(sibship size)、出生排行(birth order)、出生年齡間隔(spacing)等面向對於子女教育成就的影響,但較少研究關注「手足性別組成」(sibship sex composition)的重要性且缺乏一致性的看法。本研究以「資源稀釋模型」(resource dilution Model)為主軸,探討家庭內的手足性別組成結構,對於子女教育成就的影響。
本研究運用「台灣社會變遷基本調查」第四期第三次社會階層組問卷進行分析,將手足性別組成的影響,從手足規模中區分出來並透過個人性別與手足性別的交互關係分解手足性別組成對教育成就的影響;從台灣文化脈絡下分析男性手足及性別少數假設對於不同性別者的非對稱性影響,也更進一步分析手足的性別組成如何對長女的不利位置產生影響。 研究發現,女性擁有資源較少且不穩定的情況下,其受到手足結構的影響大於男性。分析結果如下: (一)控制手足人數後,兄弟人數對女性成就的負向影響顯著高於男性;對女性來說,男性手足有手足規模之外的附加影響力。 (二)控制手足人數後,性別少數對女性的正向影響力高於男性;對女性來說,成為家中唯一的女生有助於提升其教育成就。 (三)控制手足人數後,男性手足對長女的負向影響高於非長女者;長女且有弟弟是最不利的狀況。 (四)控制手足人數後,性別少數對長女的正向影響高於非長女者;身為長女且同時為家中獨女(家裡只有一個女兒)可以減緩長女不利地位對教育成就的影響。 本研究在東亞社會的特定文化脈絡之下檢視「資源稀釋模型」在手足的性別組成對教育成就影響中如何的運作,並且提出本研究之限制與對未來研究的建議。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Educational stratification theorists have long been interested in the effects of sibship configurations on educational achievement. Numerous studies about sibship configuration have been devoted to the effects of sibship size, birth order, and spacing on education; however, far less agreement has been reached over the educational implications of sibship sex composition. In this study, the resource dilution model is the main explanation for the effects of sex composition of the sibling group.
This study explores the effects of sibship sex structure net of sibship size and decomposes these effects on educational attainment by the sex of the respondent and his/her siblings. Furthermore, in the context of patriarchal culture and Confucian culture, I analyze the position of female firstborn child in the family and how it is affected by sibship sex composition. With analyses of data from the Taiwan Social Change Survey: Year 4 of Cycle 3 (Questionnaire 1: Stratification), I find several empirical evidence to support the hypotheses. First, after controlling the impact of sibship size, the effect of the number of brothers on educational achievement is gender-asymmetric, and females suffer more detrimental effects in the process of resource dilution than males. Next, the sex minority hypothesis does not operate equally for both sexes, and having all opposite sex siblings is a significant benefit for females. Third, female firstborn children with younger brothers are situated at the lowest position in the family. Finally, the positive impact of sex minority on education still exists between firstborn females. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T00:21:15Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-96-R93325001-1.pdf: 528059 bytes, checksum: 1ea2d65caa5d5f47e5370f6a1ce3e605 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2007 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 ii
謝辭ii 中文摘要v 英文摘要vi 第一章 導論 1 第一節 數大不是美 --- 手足人數的負面影響 2 第二節 同家不同性格 --- 出生序與年齡間距 4 第三節 兄弟•姊妹不一樣 --- 手足的性別組成 6 第二章 文獻回顧 8 第一節 家庭結構與教育取得 8 智能相互影響模型(confluence model) 8 資源稀釋模型(resource dilution model) 9 第二節 性別、家庭資源分配與教育取得 11 父母的性別偏好 11 第三節 性別、性別組成與教育成就 13 家庭內資源分配 13 性別少數假設 15 儒家文化與父權社會 16 第三章 研究方法 19 第一節 資料來源與資料描述 19 第二節 資料處理 20 第三節 測量方式 21 第四節 分析方法與分析策略 25 第四章 分析結果 28 第一節 樣本基本描述統計 28 一、 家庭及個人變項描述統計 28 二、 手足規模與平均教育年數 30 第二節 性別與手足人數對教育成就的影響 32 第三節 性別、手足性別組成對教育成就的影響 35 第四節 長女、手足性別組成對教育成就的影響 40 第五章 結論與討論 43 第一節 研究結論 43 第二節 討論 46 第三節 研究貢獻 48 第四節 研究限制與未來研究建議 50 第六章 參考書目 51 英文書目 51 中文書目 54 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 兄弟•姊妹不一樣?手足的性別組成對教育成就的影響 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Are Brothers and Sisters Different?
The Effects of Sibship Sex Composition on Educational Achievement | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 95-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 關秉寅,陳婉琪 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 手足結構,手足性別組成,家庭資源,教育成就, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | sibship structure, sibship sex composition,intra-family resource,educational achievement, | en |
dc.relation.page | 55 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2007-07-27 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 社會學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 社會學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-96-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 515.68 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。