請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/28733
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 林裕彬 | |
dc.contributor.author | Min-Hau Chen | en |
dc.contributor.author | 陳敏華 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T00:19:59Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2008-07-31 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2007-07-31 | |
dc.date.issued | 2007 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2007-07-27 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 一、中文部分
1. 丁亞中(2006),應用GIS與細胞自動機(CA)模擬都市空間之擴張-以宜蘭平原為例,中國文化大學第學研究所地理組碩士論文。 2. 王如意、宋文元(2005),集水區土地利用改變影響水資源規劃之研究,行政院農業委員會九十四年度科技計畫研究報告。 3. 王敏先(2004),景觀生態概念與指標應用於景觀規劃之探討,中國文化大學景觀學研究所碩士論文。 4. 朱子豪(1991),台灣省沿海土地利用及管制調查-花東地區,台灣大學地理系研究所。 5. 朱健銘(1999),土地利用空間型態之研究,國立臺灣大學地理學研究所碩士論文。 6. 肖篤寧(1999)論現代景觀科學的形成與發展,地理科學,19(4):1-5。 7. 林士強(2006)利用景觀生態指數分析墾丁國家公園土地利用變遷之研究,逢大學土地管理學系碩士班碩士論文。 8. 林慶昀(2004),汐止地區土地利用變遷影響逕流量空間分布之研究,中國文化大學地學研究所地理組碩士論文。 9. 周天穎、簡甫任、雷祖強(2003),都市地區土地利用變遷量化分析之研究,台灣土地研究,第6期,第1卷,第105-130頁。 10. 吳振發(2006),土地利用變遷及景觀生態評估方法之建立,國立臺北大學都市計劃研究所博士論文。 11. 游保杉(2004),科學發展,2004年2月,374期,6 ~ 13頁 12. 陳慈仁(2001)台北市資訊軟體業與網際網路服務業區位分佈之研究,國立臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究所碩士論文。 13. 梁蘄善(1985),地理學計量分析,中國文化大學出版部。 14. 景貴和(1993),景觀生態學的若干理論問題,景觀生態學:理論、方法及應用,肖篤寧主編,地景企業股份有限公司,台北市。 15. 童慶斌(2004),氣候變遷對台灣水文環境之衝擊。全球變遷通訊雜誌第四十四期。 16. 童慶斌(2006),氣候變遷課程教本。 17. 黃書禮、蔡靜如(2000),臺北盆地土地利用變遷趨勢之研究,都市與計劃,第27期,第1卷,第1-23頁。 18. 鄔建國(2003),景觀生態學-格局、過程、尺度與等級,五南圖書出版股份有限公司。 19. 張敬悅(2005),空間資料挖掘方法應用於土地利用變遷之研究,國立中央大 學土木工程研究所碩士論文。 20. 鄧東波、林裕彬(2001),從景觀生態學觀點探討都市綠地-以台北市信義計畫區為例,中國文化大學地學研究所地理組碩士論文。 21. 賴進貴(2000),細胞自動機與地理資訊系統結合之初探研究,中國地理學會會刊,第28期,第109-126頁。 22. 謝明昇(2005),應用遺傳規劃法進行氣候預報降尺度分析於季節性河川流量預報,國立臺灣大學生物環境系統工程學研究所碩士論文。 23. 顏怡璇(2003) ,運用細胞自動化理論模擬森林地景變遷之研究,東海大學景觀系碩士論文。 24. 嚴科偉(2002) ,大規模自然擾動對景觀空間結構影響之探討,國立臺灣大學生物環境系統工程學研究所碩士論文。 二、英文部分 25. Adams, D. M., Alig, R. J. and Callaway, J. M., 1996. The forest and agriculture sector optimization model (FASOM): model structure and policy applications. Research paper PNW-RP-495. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 26. Agarwal, C., Green, G. M., Grove, J. M., Evans, T. P. and Schweik, C. M., 2001. A review and assessment of land-use change models: dynamics of space, time, and human choice. General technical report NE-297. Newtown Square, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station. 27. Apan, A. A. and Peterson, J. A., 1998. Probing tropical deforestation, Applied Geography, 18(2):137-152. 28. Berling-Wolff, S. and, Wu, J., 2004. Modeling urban landscape dynamics: a case study in Phoenix, USA. Urban Ecosyst. 7, 215–240. 29. Berry, M. W., Hazen, B. C., MacIntyre, R. L. and Richard. R. O., 1996. LUCAS: a system for modeling land-use change, IEEE Computational Science and Engineering, 3(1):24. 30. Botequilha Leitao, A., Ahern, J., 2002. Applying landscape ecological concepts and metrics in sustainable landscape planning. Landscape Urban Plan. 59,65–93. 31. Brassoulis, H. ,2000. Analysis of Land Use Change: Theoretical and Modeling Approaches. http://www.rri.wvu.edu/WebBook/Briassoulis/contents.htm 32. Charles J. Krebs, 1989. Ecological Methodology, New York: Harper and Row. 33. Cushman, S.A., Wallin, D.O., 2000. Rate and patterns of landscape change in the Central Sikhote-alin Mountains, Russian Far East. Landscape Ecol. 15,643–659. 34. Chomitz, K. M., and Gray, D. A., 1996. Roads, land use, and deforestation: A spatial model applied to Belize. The World Bank Economic Review, 10 (3): 487-512. 35. Cook, E. A., 2002. Landscape structure indices for assessing urban ecological network, Landscape and Urban Planning, 58, 269-280. 36. Corry, R.C., Nassauer, J.I., 2005. Limitations of using landscape pattern indices to evaluate the ecological consequences of alternative plans and designs.Landscape Urban Plan. 72, 265–280. 37. Clarke, K. C., S. Hoppen and L Gaydos, 1997, A self-modifying cellular automaton model of historical urbanization in the San Francisco Bay area, Environment and Planning B, Vol. 24, 247-261. 38. Clarke, K. C., Hoppen, S. and Leonard, L. J., 1998. Methods and techniques for rigorous calibration of a cellular automaton model of urban growth. http://www.ncgia.ucsb.edu/conf/SANTA_FE_CD-ROM/sf_papaers/clake_keith/clarkeetal.html. 39. Cliff, A. and Ord, J. K.,1973. Spatial Autocorrelation, London: Pion 40. Cliff, A., Haggett P, Ord J K, Bassett K, Davies RB,1975. Elements of Spatial Structure: A Quantitative Approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. p 150 41. Cliff, A. and Ord, J. K.,1981. Spatial Processes: Models and Applications , London: Pion. 42. Deutsch C.V. and A.G. Jounel,1992.Geostatistical software liberary and users guide, Oxford University Press.New York 43. Diaz N. M, 1996.Landscape metrics: a new tool for forest ecologists .Journal of Forestry, 94(12): 12-16 44. Fang, S., Gertner, G. Z., Sun, Z. and Anderson, A. A., 2004. The impact of interaction in spatial simulation of the dynamics of urban sprawl, Landscape and Urban Planning, 73(4): 294-306. 45. Fortin, M.J., Boots, B., Csillag, F., Remmel, T.K., 2003. On the role of spatial stochastic models in understanding landscape indices in ecology. Oikos 102, 203–212. 46. Ferreira, H., Botequilha Leitão, A., Salgueiro, R., et al., 2003. Sustainable landscape planning as a tool to address water resource planning: a Portuguese case-study on a coastal aquifer salination. In: Actas da Conferência TIAC'03: Tecnologíade la intrusión de agua de mar en acuíferos costeros: Países Mediterráneos. Instituto Geológico y Minero de España, Alicante, 641-650. 47. Fitz, H. C., DeBellevue, E. B. and Costanza, R., 1996. Development of a general ecosystem model for a range of sales and ecosystems, Ecological Modelling, 88:263-295. 48. Gilruth, P. T., Marsh, S. E. and Itami, R., 1995. A dynamic spatial model of shifting cultivation in the highlands of Guinea, West Africa, Ecological Modelling, 79:179-197 49. Gustafson, E.J. and Parker, G.R.,1992. Relationships between landcover proportion and indices of landscape spatial pattern, Landscape Ecology 7(2):102-103. 50. Guoliang Liu, Shijie Han, Xiuhai Zhao, John D. Nelson, Hongshu Wang and Weiying Wang,2006. Optimisation algorithms for spatially constrained forest planning. Ecological Modelling, 194, 421-428. 51. Haith, D.A., Shoemaker, I.L., 1987. Generalized watershed loading functions for stream flow nutrients. Water Resour. Bull. 107, 121–137. 52. Hardie, Ian W. and Parks, P. J., 1997. Land use with heterogeneous land quality: an application of an area base model, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 79(2):299-310. 53. Herold, M., Goldstein, N. C. and Clarke, K. C., 2003. The spatiotemporal form of urban growth: measurement, analysis and modeling. Remote Sensing of Environment, 86, 286-302. 54. Hulshoff, R. M.,1995.Landscape indices describing a Dutch landscape, Landscape Ecology, 10(2):101-111 55. James F. Palmer, 2004. Using spatial metrics to predict scenic perception in a changing landscape:Dennis, Massachusetts. Landscape and Urban Planning,69,201-218. 56. Jones, K.B., A.C. Neale, M.S. Nash, R.D. Remorte, J.D. van Wickham, K.H. Ritters, and R.V. O’Neill. 2001 Predicting nutrient and sediment loadings to streams from landscape metrics: A multiple watershed study from the United States Mid-Atlantic Region. Landscape Ecol.16, 301–312. 57. Jongman, R.H.G., 1999. Landscape ecology in land use planning. In: Wiens, J.A., Moss, M.R. (Eds.), Issue in Landscape Ecology. International Association for Landscape Ecology. Guelph, Ontario, pp. 112–118. 58. Jim Sanderson and Larry D. Harris, 2000. Landscape Ecology A Top-Down Approach, Washington, DC: Lewis Publishers. 59. Jiunn-Der Duh and Daniel G. Brown ,2005.Spatial Analysis and Modeling. Spatial optimization for generating prescribed patterns. ESRI GIS. 60. Kearns, F.R.,Kelly, N.M., Carter, J.L., Resh,V.H., 2005.Amethod for the use of landscape metrics in freshwater research and management. Landscape Ecol.20, 113–125. 61. Kirkpatrick,1983. Optimization by Simulated Annealing.Science, 220,671-680 62. Landis, J. D., 1995. Imagining land use futures: applying the California Urban Futures Models. APA Journal, 61(4):438-457. 63. Landis, J. D., Cogan, C., Monzon, P. and Reilly, M., 1998. Development and pilot application of the California Urban and Biodiversity Analysis (CURBA) Model, Monogr. MG-1998-01. Berkeley: University of California, Institute of Urban and Regional Development. 64. Li, Xia and Anthony Gar-On Yeh, 2000, Modelling sustainable urban development by the integration of constrained cellular automata and GIS, International Journal of geographical information science, Vol.14, No.2, pp.131-152 65. Li, H.B.,Wu, J.G., 2004. Use and misuse of landscape indices. Landscape Ecol.19, 389–399. 66. Lin, Y. P. , Hong, N. M. , Wu, P. J.,Wu, C. F. and Peter H. Verburg, 2007. Impacts of land use change scenarios on hydrology and land use patterns in the Wu-Tu watershed in Northern Taiwan, Landscape and Urban Planning, 80, 111-126. 67. Lin,Y.P., Teng, T.P., Chang, T.K., 2002. Multivariate analysis of soil heavy metal pollution and landscape patterns analysis in Changhua County in Taiwan.Landscape Urban Plan. 62, 19–35. 68. Ling Lu, Xin Li and Guong Cheng, 2003. Landscape evolution in the middle Heihe River Basin of north-west China during the last decade. Journal of Arid Environments, 53,395-408. 69. Ling Lu, 2002. Landscape evolution in the middle Heihe River Basin of north-west China during the last decade. Journal of Arid Environments, 53, 395-408. 70. McGarigal, K. and Marks, B.J., 1995. FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tec. Rep. PNW-351. 71. Mertens, B. and Lambin, E. F., 1997. Spatial modelling of deforestation in southern Cameroon. Applied Geography 17: 143–162. 72. Monica G. Turner, Robert H. Gardner, Robert V. O’Neill, 2001. Landscape Ecology in theory and practice pattern and process, New York: Springer. 73. Moreira F,Rego FC,Ferreira PG.2001.Temporal (1958∼1995) pattern of change in a cultural landscape of northwestern Portugal:Implications for fire occurrence.Landscape Ecol,16:557∼567 74. O’Callaghan, J. R., 1995. NELUP: an introduction, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 38(1):5-20. 75. Ogrosky, H. O. and Mockus, V. 1964. Hydrology agricultural lands. In: Handbook of Applied Hydrology, V. T. Chow (Editor). McGraw-Hill, New York, New York. 76. Pete Bettinger, David Graetz, Kevin Boston, John Sessions and Woodam Chung, 2002. Eight Heuristic Planning Techniques Applied to Three Increasingly Difficult Wildlife Planning Problems. Fennica, 36(2), 561-584. 77. Pierre Legendre, 1993. Spatial autocorrelation: trouble or new paradigm? Ecology,74(6),1659-1673. 78. Ping, J. L. ,Green, C. J. ,Zartman R. E. and Bronson K. F., 2004. Exploring spatial dependence of cotton yield using global and local autocorrelation statistics, Field Crops Rescarch, 89, 219-236. 79. Prato, T., 2005, Modeling ecological impacts of landscape change, Environmental modeling and software, 20: 1359-1363. 80. Remmel, T.K., Csillag, F., 2003. When are two landscape pattern indices significantly different? J. Geograph. Syst. 5, 331–351. 81. Richard T. Forman, 1995. Land Mosaics the ecology of landscapes and regions, UK: Cambridge. 82. Richard T. Forman and Michel Godron, 1986. Landscape Ecology, Canada: John Wiley and Sons. 83. Naveh, Z., 1994. Landscape Ecology Theory and Application, New York: Springer-Verlag. 84. Schneider, L. C. and Pontius Jr. R. G., 2001. Modeling land-use change in the Ipswich watershed, Massachusetts, USA, Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environmental, 85:83-94. 85. Stuart J. Marsden, Alan H. Fielding, Claire Mead and M. Zakaria Hussin(2002) A technique for measuring the density and complexity of understorey vegetation in tropical forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 165, 117-123. 86. Swallow, S. K., P. Talukdar, and Wear. D. N., 1997. Spatial and temporal specialization in forest ecosystem management under sole ownership, American Journal of Agriculture Economics, 79:311-326. 87. Timo Pukkala and Mikko Kurttila, 2005. Examining the performance of six heuristic optimization techniques in different forest planning problems. Silva Fennica , 39 (1), 67-80. 88. Turner M.G., 1989. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, Landscape ecology: the effect of pattern on process, 20, 171-197. 89. Turner, M. G. and R. H. Gardner, 1991. Quantitative Methods in Landscape Ecology, New York: Springer. 90. Turner M.G. and Ruscher C.L., 1988. Changes in landscape patterns in Georgia, Landscape Ecology, 1, 241-251. 91. Tung, C. P. and Haith, D. A., 1995, Global Warming Effects on New York Ssreamflows. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 121(2):216-225. 92. Tung, C.P., 2001, Climate change impacts on water resources of the Tesngwen creek watershed in Taiwan. J. Am. Water Res. Assoc. 37, 167–176. 93. Veldkamp, A. and Fresco, L. O., 1996. CLUE: a conceptual model to study the conversion of land use and its effects, Ecological Modelling, 85:253-270. 94. Veldkamp, A. and Verburg, P. H., 2004. Modelling land use change and environmental impact, Journal of Environmental Management, 72(1-2):1-3. 95. Venema, H. D. ,Calamai P. H. and Paul Fieguth, 2005. Forest structure optimization using evolutionary programming and landscape ecology metrics. European Journal of Operational Research, 164, 423-439 96. Voinov, A., Costanza, R. and Wainger, L., 1999. Patuxent landscape model: integrated ecological economic modeling of a watershed, Environmental Modelling and Software, 14:473-491. 97. Wear, D. N., Liu, R., and Foreman, J. M., 1999. The effects of population growth on timber management and inventories in Virginia, Forest Ecology and Management, 188:107-115. 98. Weinstoerffer, J., Girardin, P., 2000. Assessment of the contribution of land use pattern and intensity to landscape quality: use of a landscape indicator. Ecol.Model. 130, 95–109. 99. Wenche E. Dramstad, James D. Olson and Richard T. T. Forman, 1996. Landscape Ecology Principles in Landscape Architecture and Land-Use Planning, Washington, DC: Island Press. 100. Wheeler,2001. A Note on the Spatial Correlation Structure of CountyLevel Growth in the U.S., Journal of Regional Science , 41(3),433-449. 101. Williams, N. S. G., McDonnell, M. J. and Seager, E. J., 2005. Factors influencing the loss of an endangered ecosystem in an urbanizing landscape: a case study of native grasslands from Melbourne, Australia, Landscape and Urban Planning, 71:35-49. 102. Wood, E. C., J. E. Lewis, G. G. Tappan and Lietzow. R. W., 1997. The development of a land cover change model for southern Senegal. In: Land use modeling workshop; 1997 June 5-6; Sioux Falls, SD. Santa Barbara, CA: National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis. Available at: http://www.ncgia.ucsb.edu/conf/landuse97. 103. Li X., Lu L., Cheng G. and Xiao H.,2001. Quantifying landscape structure of the Heihe River Basin, north-west China using FRAGSTATS. Journal of Arid Environments,48,521-535. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/28733 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 土地利用變遷與氣候、自然與人為環境、土壤條件、水文條件、生態系統的互動關係是土地資源永續發展相關研究極力探討的議題。然而土地利用的改變會造成集水區中水文循環的影響,其中包括有入滲、地下水補注、基流以及流量。
景觀指數可以用來量化景觀中嵌塊體與嵌塊體之間的空間關係,並且能詳細的描繪出獨立的嵌塊體在景觀層級上的相對空間關係。除此之外,景觀指數更可以有效地用來規劃自然資源與規劃土地利用。在空間格局與過程的關係上,景觀指數可以提供規劃者關於景觀功能的資訊,規劃者可以藉由景觀指數來了解困難且不易判斷之問題。 在人口成長的壓力下,集水區內林地砍伐與開發,造成土地利用的改變將會衝擊到集水區內的水文系統。以景觀或土地利用格局為優化的目標,將可維持良好的景觀功能與過程。本研究將利用優化理論中的模擬退火法來優化景觀生態指數並將此土地利用優化模式應用於五堵集水區內,並提出具備有景觀生態意義的土地利用與景觀規劃計畫。藉由訂定不同的開放策略、土地需求以及土地轉移策略,分析在不同的策略下,對土地利用格局造成的影響。研究中訂定目標函數為平均嵌塊體大小最大化,並分為開發林地面積5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 30%, 35%, 40%, 45% 和50%,且開發的林地轉移為農地、建地以及草地,並將此模式結合水文模式以計算其對水文量造成之衝擊與影響。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Exactly how changes in land use and land cover and climate, human and natural environment, soil, water, or ecological systems are related which is a major research area in sustainable development. Land use changes can influence hydrological processes including infiltration, groundwater recharge, base flow and runoff in a watershed.
Landscape metrics quantified in terms of the spatial relationship of patches the landscape are spatially explicit at the landscape level because the relative location of individual patches within the landscape is represented in some way. Furthermore, Landscape metrics can be useful when planning for natural resources or planning for sustainable land-use. The relationships between spatial patterns and processes, landscape metrics can inform planner about landscape functions, which are difficult to measure directly. One of the major land use changes that have an impact on the hydrological cycle and regulation are changes in the spatial patterns caused by deforestation and forest fragmentation by human development within a watershed. Optimizing landscape or land use aims to obtain landscape or land use patterns which well sustain landscape functions and processes. This study developed an optimal landscape simulation model by optimizing (maximizing or minimizing) landscape metrics of the forest class level using simulated annealing for alternative land use management strategies in Wu-Tu watershed in Northern Taiwan, and analysis the impact on the hydrological cycle. Landscape models simulate alternative landscape dynamics which provide information to evaluate and test hypotheses or scenarios of landscape or land use management. Optimal objectives were to identify the landscape patterns with the largest mean forest patches by maximizing a landscape metric Mean Patch Size (MPS) deforested scenarios that are removed 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 30%, 35%, 40%, 45% and 50% forest to be replaced by built-up area, agricultural land and grassland within the study watershed. The optimal simulation approach can be integrated hydrological with models which can evaluate the impact on the hydrological cycle. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T00:19:59Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-96-R94622025-1.pdf: 6987198 bytes, checksum: 3e17bd67c39ef2c26c918810b66b42db (MD5) Previous issue date: 2007 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 謝誌 I
摘要 II ABSTRACT III 章節目錄 IV 圖目錄 VI 表目錄 IX 第一章 序論 1 第一節 研究動機 1 第二節 研究目的 3 第三節 研究流程 4 第二章 文獻回顧 6 第一節 土地利用變遷與模擬 6 第二節 景觀生態結構分析與景觀生態規劃 12 第三節 空間自相關模式 15 第四節 應用啟發式演算法推求空間分布 16 第五節 水文模式 18 第三章 研究理論與方法 19 第一節 研究區域 19 第二節 景觀生態學 24 第三節 全域空間自相關 51 第四節 啟發式演算法 53 第五節 水文模式 58 第六節 土地利用變遷驅動力分析方法 62 第四章 結果與討論 64 第一節 土地利用變遷驅動力分析模式建構 64 第二節 土地利用空間格局分析 69 第三節 土地利用轉移策略分析 79 第四節 土地利用適宜性 96 第五章 結論與建議 104 第一節 結論 104 第二節 後續研究建議 108 參考文獻 109 附錄 120 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 應用模擬退火法及景觀指數於集水區土地利用最佳化規劃 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Using simulated annealing in landscape metrics to simulate landscape patterns in watershed planning and management | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 95-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 黃書禮,張尊國,童慶彬 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 景觀指數,景觀生態,土地利用,優化模式,模擬退火法, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | landscape metrics,landscape ecology,land use,Optimization models,simulated annealing, | en |
dc.relation.page | 121 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2007-07-27 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 生物環境系統工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 生物環境系統工程學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-96-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 6.82 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。