請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/28645
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 李培芬 | |
dc.contributor.author | Wan-Jyun Chen | en |
dc.contributor.author | 陳宛均 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T00:15:30Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2007-07-30 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2007-07-30 | |
dc.date.issued | 2007 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2007-07-26 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 尤仲妮,2000。恆春熱帶植物園區台灣獼猴活動模式與食性。國立台灣大學動物學研究所碩士 論文。
吳正文,2003。海拔高度與棲地對鳥巢掠食風險影響之研究。國立屏東科技大學熱帶農業暨國際合作研究所碩士 論文。 林瑞興,1995。繡眼畫眉 (Alcippe morrisonia) 生殖及鳥群生態之研究。國立台灣大學動物學研究所碩士 論文。 莊順安,1994。福山森林生態系三種食肉目動物 (麝香貓、食蟹獴、鼬獾) 的食性研究。國立台灣大學動物學研究所碩士 論文。 許晃哲,2003。福山試驗林繡眼畫眉巢位棲地生態之研究。國立台灣大學生態學與演化生物學研究所碩士 論文。 陳恩理,1996。邊緣效應對福山鳥類群聚的影響。國立台灣大學動物學研究所碩士論文。 黃光瀛,2004。陽明山四種共域猛禽於繁殖期間之食性研究。國立台灣大學動物學研究所博士 論文。 Angelstam, P. 1986. Predation on ground-nesting birds' nests in relation to predator densities and habitat edge. Oikos 47:365-373. Auer, S. K., R. D. Bassar, J. J. Fontaine, and T. E. Martin. 2007. Breeding biology of passerines in a subtropical montane forest in northwestern Argentina. The Condor 109:321-333. Buler, J. J., and R. B. Hamilton. 2000. Predation of natural and artificial nests in a southern pine forest. The Auk 117:739-747. Burhans, D. E., and F. R. Thompson III. 1998. Effects of time and nest-site characteristics on concealment of songbird nests. The Condor 100:663-672. Burhans, D. E., and F. R. Thompson III. 2001. Relationship of songbird nest concealment to nest fate and flushing behavior of adults. The Auk 118:237-242. Burnham, K. P., and D. R. Anderson 1998. Model selection and inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer Verlag, New York. Chace, J. F., and J. J. Walsh. 2006. Urban effects on native avifauna: a review. Landscape and Urban Planning 74:46–69. Collias, N. E., and E. C. Collias 1984. Nest building and bird behavior. Princeton University Press Princeton, New Jersey. Cresswell, W. 1997. Nest predation: the relative effects of nest characteristics, clutch size and parental behaviour. Animal Behaviour 53:93-103. Fitch, H. S., P. Goodrum, and C. Newman. 1952. The Armadillo in the Southeastern United States. Journal of Mammalogy 33:21-37. Flaspohler, D. J., and S. A. Temple. 2000. Relationship between nest success and concealment in two ground-nesting passerines. Journal of Field Ornithology 71:736-747. Gering, J. C., and R. B. Blair. 1999. Predation on artificial bird nests along an urban gradient: predatory risk or relaxation in urban environments? Ecography 22:532-541. Gibbs, J. P. 1991. Avian nest predation in tropical wet forest: an experimental study. Oikos 60:151-161. Gustafson, T. 2005. Nest predation in birds -important concept and methodological problems. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala. Hazler, K. R. 2004. Mayfield logistic regression: a practical approach for analysis of nest survival. The Auk 121:707-716. Heltzel, J. M., and S. L. Earnst. 2006. Factors influencing nest success of songbirds in aspen and willow riparian areas in the great basin. The Condor 108:842-855. Jokimäki, J., and E. Huhta. 2000. Artificial nest predation and abundance of birds along an urban gradient. The Condor 102:838-847. Kristan III, W. B., A. J. Lynam, M. V. Price, and J. T. Rotenberry. 2003. Alternative causes of edge-abundance relationships in birds and small mammals of California coastal sage scrub. Ecography 26:29-44. Latta, S. C., J. M. W. JR., E. Terranova, and M. Pagan. 1995. An experimental study of nest predation in a subtropical wet forest following hurricane disturbance. Wilson Bulletin 107:590-602. Lin, R. S., C. T. Yao, and P. F. Lee. 2007. The diet of Fairy Pitta Pitta nympha nestlings in Taiwan as revealed by videotaping. Zoological Studies 43:355-361. Manolis, J. G., D. E. Andersen, and F. J. Cuthbert. 2000. Uncertain nest fates in songbird studies and variation in Mayfield estimation. The Auk 117:615-626. Martin, T. E. 1993a. Nest predation among vegetation layers and habitat types: revising the dogmas. The American Naturalist 141:897-913. Martin, T. E. 1993b. Nest predation and nest sites. Bioscience 43:523-532. Martin, T. E. and G. R. Geupel. 1993. Nest-monitoring plots: Methods for locating nests and monitoring success. Journal of Field Ornithology 64:507-519. Martin, T. E. 1995. Avian life history evolution in relation to nest sites, nest predation, and food. Ecological Monographs 65:101-127. Martin, T. E. 1996. Life history evolution in tropical and south temperate birds: What do we really know? Journal of Avian Biology 27:263-272. Martin, T. E. 2004. Avian life-history evolution has an eminent past: does it have a bright future? The Auk 121:289-301. Martin, T. E., C. Paine, C. J. Conway, W. M. Hochachka, P. Allen, and W. Jenkins 1997. BBIRD field protocol - Breeding biology research and monitoring database. Montana Cooperative Wildlife Research Unit. Mayfield, H. F. 1961. Nesting Success Calculated from Exposure. The Wilson Bulletin 78:255-261. Mayfield, H. F. 1975. Suggestions for calculating nest success. The Wilson Bulletin 87:456-466. McCallum, C. A., and S. J. Hannon. 2001. Accipiter predation of American Redstart nestlings. The Condor 103:192-194. Nalwanga, D., P. Lloyd, M. A. Plessis, and T. E. Martin. 2004. The influence of nest-site characteristics on the nesting success of the Karoo Prinia (Prinia maculosa). Ostrich 75:269-274. Ortega, C. P., J. C. Ortega, F. B. Sforza, and P. M. Sforza. 2002. Methods for determining concealment of arboreal bird nests. Wildlife Society Bulletin 30:1050-1056. Pangau-Adam, M. Z., M. Waltert, and M. Mühlenberg. 2006. Nest predation risk on ground and shrub nests in forest margin areas of Sulawesi, Indonesia. Biodiversity and Conservation 15:4143-4158. Peterson, B. L., B. E. Kus, and D. H. Deutschman. 2004. Determining nest predators of the Least Bell's Vireo through point counts, tracking stations, and video photography. Journal of Field Ornithology 75:89-95. Phillips, T., E. Nol, D. Burke, and W. Dunford. 2005. Impacts of housing developments on Wood Thrush nesting success in hardwood forest fragments. The Condor 107:97-106. Pietz, P. J., and D. A. Granfors. 2005. Parental nest defense on videotape: more reality than 'Myth'. The Auk 122:701-705. Rangen, S. A., R. G. Clark, and K. A. Hobson. 2000. Visual and olfactory attributes of artificial nests. Auk 117:136-146. RemeŠ, V. 2005. Nest concealment and parental behaviour interact in affecting nest survival in the blackcap (Sylvia atricapilla): an experimental evaluation of the parental compensation hypothesis. Behavior Ecology Sociobiology 58:326-333. Ricklefs, R. E. 1969. An analysis of nesting mortality in birds. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology 9:1-48. Robinson, W. D., and R. P. Moore. 2004. Artificial bird nests, external validity, and bias in ecological field studies. Ecology 85:1562-1567. Robinson, W. D., J. N. Styrsky, and J. D. Brawn. 2005. Are artificial bird nests effective surrogates for estimating predation on real bird nests? A test with tropical birds. The Auk 122:843-852. Rollinson, N., and R. J. Brooks. 2007. Marking nests increases the frequency of nest depredation in a northern population of Painted Turtles (Chrysemys picta). Journal of Herpetology 41:174-176. Sabine, J. B., J. M. Meyers, and S. H. Schweitzer. 2005. A simple, inexpensive video camera setup for the study of avian activity. Journal of Field Ornithology 76:293-297. Scheuerlein, A., and E. Gwinner. 2006. Reduced nestling growth of East African Stonechats Saxicola torquata axillaris in the presence of a predator. Ibis 148:468-476. Siegel, R. A., and J. T. Collins 1993. Snakes: ecology and behavior. McGraw-Hill, New York. Small, S. L. 2005. Mortality factors and predators of Spotted Towhee nests in the Sacramento Valley, California. Journal of Field Ornithology 76:252-258. Smith, J. E., S. J. Taylor, C. J. Whelan, M. L. Denight, and M. M. Stake. 2004. Behavioral interactions between fire ant and vertebrate nest predators at two Black-capped Vireo nests. Wilson Bulletin 116:163-166. Söderström, B. 1999. Artificial nest predation rates in tropical and temperate forests: a review of the effects of edge and nest site. Ecography 22:455-463. Söderström, B., T. Pärt, and J. Rydén. 1998. Different nest predator faunas and nest predation risk on ground and shrub nests at forest ecotones: an experiment and a review. Oecologia 117:108-118. Stake, M. M., and D. A. Cimprich. 2003. Using video to monitor predation at Black-capped video nests. The Condor 105:348-357. Stake, M. M., J. Faaborg, and a. F. R. Thompson III. 2004. Video identification of predators at Golden-cheeked Warbler nests. Journal of Field Ornithology 75:337-344. Stake, M. M., F. R. Thompson III, J. Faaborg, and D. E. Burhans. 2005. Patterns of snake predation at songbird nests in Missouri and Texas. Journal of Herpetology 39:215-222. Staller, E. L., W. E. Palmer, J. P. Carroll, R. P. Thornton, and D. C. Sisson. 2005. Identifying predators at northern bobwhite nests. Journal of Wildlife Management 69:124-132. Thompson III, F. R., and D. E. Burhans. 2004. Differences in predators of artificial and real songbird nests: evidence of bias in artificial nest studies. Conservation Biology 18:373-380. Thompson III, F. R., W. Dijak, and D. E. Burhans. 1999. Video identification of predators at songbird nests in old fields. The Auk 116:259-264. Thorington, K. K., and R. Bowman. 2003. Predation rate on artificial nests increases with human housing density in suburban habitats. Ecography 26:188-196. Weidinger, K. 2002. Interactive effects of concealment, parental behaviour and predators on the survival of open passerine nests. Journal of Animal Ecology 71:424-437. Wong, T. C. M., N. S. Sodhi, and I. M. Turner. 1998. Artificial nest and seed predation experiments in tropical lowland rainforest remnants of Singapore. Biological Conservation 85:97-104. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/28645 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 天敵掠食是造成小型燕雀目鳥類繁殖失敗的主因,而在不同的氣候區,由於動物群聚組成的差異,也會導致天敵組成有所不同。因此,親鳥理論上會選擇較安全的巢位,以躲避天敵來提高繁殖成功率。為了檢視上述假說,本研究於2006- 2007年繁殖季在雲林縣湖本村的低海拔森林內,分別針對在灌叢及地面築巢鳥類的繁殖成功率、巢位特徵、微棲地環境因子以及其鳥巢天敵進行研究,並比較不同巢位類型所面臨的天敵種類,及天敵出現與巢位特徵的關係。研究期間記錄了繡眼畫眉 (Alcippe morrisonia) (n=103) 及八色鳥 (Pitta nympha) (n=28) 等8種鳥類共205個鳥巢,其中依照築巢位置分成135個灌叢巢 (85個被天敵掠食,累積總觀察天數1331天) 與70個地面巢 (31個被天敵掠食,累積總觀察天數818天),使用Mayfield estimator估算天敵掠食率的結果,顯示灌叢巢的每日天敵掠食率 (6.39±0.67%) 顯著高於地面巢 (3.79±0.67%, p <0.001)。天敵資料以24小時不間斷的錄影記錄鳥巢來直接獲取,並佐以被天敵掠食的鳥巢遺跡來判定天敵種類,結果發現熱帶、亞熱帶地區的天敵組成,與溫帶地區不甚相同。台灣亞熱帶低海拔森林的鳥巢天敵組成有鳥類、哺乳類、蛇類與螞蟻。其中蛇類為灌叢巢 (69.3.%) 與地面巢 (71.4%) 的共同主要掠食者,又以大頭蛇 (Boiga kraepelini)、赤背松柏根 (Oligodon formosanus) 與龜殼花 (Trimeresurus mucrosquamatus) 最為常見;灌叢巢的次要掠食者為鳥類與台灣獼猴 (Macaca cyclopsis),地面巢則是須面對食蟹獴 (Herpestes urva) 與白鼻心 (Paguma larvata taivana) 等在地面活動的哺乳類天敵。並使用Mayfield 邏輯迴歸分析環境因子與天敵之間的關係,發現每種天敵各自擁有其獨特的掠食策略,且溫帶氣候區鳥類研究人員所重視的視覺遮蔽度假說,並不完全適用於蛇類掠食壓力沉重的熱帶、亞熱帶氣候區。而所謂安全的巢位與當地天敵種類的組成有必然的關係。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Predation is a primary cause of nest mortality in many nests of small passerines. And the difference of fauna causes different patterns of nest predation in temperate, tropical and subtropical region. Therefore bird would choose to select a safe nest-site to avoid predators. In order to determine the predation risks and to examine the effects of nest-site characteristics and nest microhabitat on nest success of small passerines with different nest types and with different nest predators, we monitored nesting success and identified predators of the shrub and the ground nests in a disturbed lowland forest in Huben Village, Yunlin County during two breeding seasons in 2006-2007. In total, we monitored eight species 205 nests included White-eyed Nun babbler (Alcippe Morrisonia) (n=103) and Fairy Pitta (Pitta nympha) (n=28), they were 135 shrub nests (85 predated nests, 1,331 observation days) and 70 ground nests (31 predated nests, 818 observation days). Nest daily predation rates were calculated using the Mayfield estima- tor. The nest daily predation rate of shrub nests (6.39±0.67%) was significantly higher than ground nests (3.79±0.67%, p <0.001). Nest predators were directly observed by use of digital video systems being used continuously to monitor active nests. We also based on documenting depredated nest condition and recording dental marks of predators to get the indirect evidence. Nest predators in the subtropical lowland forest included birds, mammals, snakes and ants. Snakes were the most important predators to both the ground nests (71.4%) and the shrub nests (69.3%). Among the snake predators, Taiwan tree snake (Boiga kraepelini), Taiwan kukri snake (Oligodon formosanus) and Pointed- scaled pitviper (Trimeresurus mucrosquamatus) were responsible for most predation events. While the shrub nests were more susceptible to birds and Formosan Macaque (Macaca cyclopsis), the ground nests were often predated by the ground-dwelling Crabeating mongoose (Herpestes urva) and Formosan gemfaced civet (Paguma larvata taivana). Finally, we used Mayfield logistic regression to analyze the relationship of predators and environmental factors, and also found that each type of predator searches for its prey in a different manner. The safety and success of nest sites of small passerines depended on the composition of nest predators in the area where they lived. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T00:15:30Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-96-R94b44004-1.pdf: 2306225 bytes, checksum: 538e5abf4bd3de79035796adea75788a (MD5) Previous issue date: 2007 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 摘要..................................1
前言..................................3 材料與方法............................6 研究樣區..............................6 研究物種..............................6 鳥巢繁殖記錄..........................7 搜尋鳥巢..............................7 數位攝影記錄..........................7 巡巢..................................7 人為影響範圍估算......................8 棲地測量..............................8 地面巢測量之巢位特徵..................8 灌叢巢測量之巢位特徵..................9 微棲地–植被覆蓋度....................9 微棲地–樹木密度.....................10 資料分析.............................10 地面巢與灌叢巢天敵掠食風險...........10 篩選具有影響力之環境因子.............12 環境因子與天敵掠食關係...............12 結果.................................13 人為活動對天敵分布的影響.............14 灌叢巢與地面巢所面臨的天敵掠食壓力...14 森林底層的潛在天敵...................15 鳥類.................................15 台灣獼猴.............................16 其他哺乳類...........................16 蛇類.................................16 螞蟻.................................17 影響鳥巢繁殖成功與否的環境因子.......17 主要影響的環境因子...................18 環境因子與天敵關係...................18 討論.................................20 不同氣候區的天敵掠食壓力.............20 人為活動對天敵分布的影響.............21 森林底層的天敵組成...................22 鳥類.................................22 台灣獼猴.............................23 其他哺乳類...........................24 蛇類.................................24 螞蟻.................................25 影響鳥巢繁殖成功與否的環境因子.......26 環境因子與天敵關係...................26 鳥巢高度.............................27 隱蔽度、偽裝程度與鳥巢覆蓋度.........27 結論.................................28 參考文獻.............................29 圖...................................36 表格.................................50 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 臺灣中部低海拔森林燕雀目鳥種灌叢巢與地面巢的天敵掠食風險 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Predation Risk of the Shrub and Ground Nesting Passerines in a Disturbed Lowland Forest of Central Taiwan | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 95-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 丁宗蘇,林雨德,許皓捷,許富雄 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 亞熱帶氣候區,台灣低海拔森林,繁殖成功率,巢位特徵,鳥巢天敵,隱蔽度,天敵掠食風險, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | subtropical region,Taiwan disturbed lowland forest,nest survival rate,nest characteristics,nest predator,concealment,nest predation risk, | en |
dc.relation.page | 60 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2007-07-27 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生命科學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 生態學與演化生物學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 生態學與演化生物學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-96-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 2.25 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。