請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/28578完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 林裕彬 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ta-Hsiang Cho | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 卓大翔 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T00:12:50Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2007-07-31 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2007-07-31 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2007 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2007-07-26 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 1.李明儒、林信輝、于錫亮（2002），應用生物整合指標（IBI）評估溪流生態工法實施效益之可行性，第一屆自然生態工法理論與實務研討會論文集，行政院農業委員會，p.103－p115。
2.梁文盛，2004，河溪生態工法參考手冊，本土化水域生態工法工程技術之研究(第三期)，[研究報告0940246-1]，行政院公共工程委員會委託研究 3.李鴻源，經濟部水利署，2004，河川廊道棲第改善復育技術與對策之研究(1/3)，財團法人台灣水利環境科技研究發展教育基金會 4.朱育民，2001，台灣產瓢鰭蝦虎屬之型態分類與mtDNA分子演化及日本瓢鰭蝦虎生殖生態之研究，國立中山大學海洋資源研究所碩士論文。 5.陳鵬仁，2004，台灣東北部卯澳地區溪流魚類調查及分區管理規劃，國立台灣大學漁業科學研究所碩士論文。 6.汪靜明，2002，台北縣大屯溪河川生態調查及溪流生態工法教育宣導計畫成果報告，中華民國生態資訊協會 7.汪靜明，2004，台北縣三隻鄉龜子山野溪整治工程(溪底橋河段)之河川棲息地生態評估計畫工作期末報告，中華民國生態資訊協會 8.汪靜明，2006，三芝鄉龜子山溪棲地生態調查工作，中華民國生態資訊協會 9.梁世雄，淡水水域生物監測之採樣器材介紹及資料分析與應用，高雄師範大學生物科學研究所。 10.林裕彬，2004，快速生物評估方法應用之可行性分析-以大屯溪為例，農工研討會 11.曠宇景觀工程顧問有限公司，2003，生態工法示範工程設計委託規劃設計，台北縣政府委託規劃設計。 12.王保進，2002，視窗版SPSS與行為心理科學研究，心理出版社 13.林慧姿，黃春松，張嘉容，廖苹邁，2001，統計學,新科技書局 14.林昀靜，2006，地理統計應用於雨量站網設計之研究，國立台灣大學生物環境系統工程學系碩士論文。 15.余燕妮，2006，台灣河川特有魚種之分區適合度曲線研訂，國立中央大學土 木工程研究所碩士論文。 16.公共工程委員會：http://eem.pcc.gov.tw/eem/?q=node/187 17.「大屯溪流域環境規劃設計」，2003，(台北市，私立中國文化大學環境設計學院景觀學研究所)。 18.宋宏一，2006，大屯溪流域生態工程後續維護與社造活動發展，水、環境與社區研討會。 19.詹見平(1994)大甲溪魚類誌。台中縣立文化中心。 20.方力行、陳義雄、韓僑權(1996)高雄縣河川魚類誌。高雄縣政府。 21.陳義雄、方力行(1999)台灣淡水及河口魚類誌。 22.Angermeier, P.L., Karr, J.R., 1994. Biological integrity versus biological diversity as policy directives: protecting biotic resources. BioScience 44, 690–697. 23.Balon, E.K., Stewart, D.J., 1983. Fish assemblages in a river with unusual gradient (Luongo, Africa–Zaire system), reflections on river zonation, and description of another new species. Environmental Biology of Fishes 9: 225–252. 24.Barbour, M.T., Jeroen, G., Blaine, D., Snyder, J.B.S, Rapid Bioassessment Protocols For Use in Streams and Wadeable Rivers: Periphyton, Benthic Macroinvertebrates, and Fish Second Edition. EPA 841-B-99-002 25.Gardner, B., Patrick, J.S., Lembo, A.J., ,2003. Predicting stream temperatures: geostatistical model comparison using alternative distance metrics. Can J. Fish. Aquati. Sci. 60, 344-351 26.Bureau of Water Protection & Land Reuse Gina McCarthy, 2002. Commissioner for the assessment of stream bottom deposits on wadeable streams, New Mexico environment department, surface water quality bureau. September 24, 2002 27.Byron, J.F., Heidi, G., Megan, H., Carrie, S., 2003. Bioassessment of Streams in Fort Valley, Peach County, Georgia ,The University of Georgia Watershed Group 28.Chapman, L.J., Kramer D. L., 1991. The consequences of flooding for the dispersal and fate of poeciliid fish in an intermittent tropical stream. Oecol. 87: 299-306. 29.Carmona, J.A., Doadrio, I., Marquez, A.L., Real, R., Hugueny, B., Vargas, J.M., 1999. Distribution patterns of indigenous freshwater fishes in the Tagus River, Spain. Environmental Biology of Fishes 54: 371–387. 30.Fluvial response a decade after wildfire in the northern Yellowstone ecosystem: a spatially explicit analysis Carl J. Legleitera, Rick L. Lawrenceb,*, Mark A. Fonstadc, W. Andrew Marcusd, Richard Aspinalle 31.Lisa, D.C., Nancy, B.G.,1999. Spatial Heterogeneity of Stream Water Nutrient Concentrations over Successional Time. Ecology Vol. 80, No. 7., pp. 2283-2298. 32.Porter, C.M., Dan, R.B., David, M.J., 2000. Central Oklahoma Bioassessment Study: Evaluation of Stream Health by Using Fish and Macroinvertebrate Communities as Biological Indicators. Proc. Okla. Acad. Sci. 80:61-70 33.Dale, V. H., Beyeler, S.C., 2001. Challenges in the development and use of ecological indicators. Ecological Indicators. 1, 3–10. 34.Price, D.J., Wesley J.B., 2005. Effectiveness of stream restoration following highway reconstruction projects on two freshwater stream in Kentucky. Ecological Engineering 25 :73-84 35.Dent C.L., Grimm, N.B., 1999. Spatial heterogeneity of stream water nutrient concentrations over successional time. Ecology, 80, 2283–2298. 36.Durance, I., Celine, L., Ormercod, S.J., 2006. Recognizing the importance of scale in the ecology and management of riverine fish. River Res. Applic. 22: 1143-1152 37.Evans, J.W., Noble, R.L., 1979. The longitudinal distribution of fishes in an East Texas stream. The American Midland Naturalist 101: 333–343. 38.Fang, L.S., 1993. The fish community of a high mountain stream in Taiean and its relation to dam design. Environmental Biology of Fishes. (38): 321-330 39.FISRWG (10/1998). Stream Corridor Restoration: Principles, Processes, and Practices. By the Federal Interagency Stream Restoration Working Group (FISRWG)(15 Federal agencies of the US gov't). GPO Item No. 0120-A; SuDocs No. A 57.6/2:EN 3/PT.653. ISBN-0-934213-59-3. 40.Ganio,L.M., Torgersen, C.E., Robert, E.G., 2005. A geostatistical approach for describing spatial pattern in stream networks. Front Ecol Environ 3(3), 138–144 41.Gerkung, D.L. 1959. The restricted movement of fish populations. Biol. Rev. 34:221-242 42.Gorman, O.T., Karr, J.R., 1978. Habitat structure and stream fish communities. Ecology, 59(3), pp. 507-515 43.Hobert, J.P., Altman, N.S., Schofield, C.L., 1997. Analyses of fish species richness with spatial covariate. Journal of the American Statistical Association 92: 846-854. 44.Hocutt, C.H., Stauffer, J.R., 1975. Influence of gradient on the distribution of fishes in Conowingo Creek, Maryland and Pennsylvania. Chesapeake Science 16: 143–147. 45.Hunsaker, C.T., Carpenter, D.E.(Eds.), 1990. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program: Ecological Indicators. Office of Research and Development, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC. 46.Isaac J.S., 1982, Fish community structure and function along two habitat gradients in a headwater stream. Ecological Monographs, 52(4), 1982, p. 395-414 47.Ver Hoef, J.M., Peterson, E., Theobald, D., 2006. Spatial statistical models that use flow and stream distance. Environ Ecol Stat, 13: 449-464 48.Karr, J.R.,1991.Biological integrity: A long-neglected aspect of water resource management, Ecological Applications, Vol.1 No:1 66-84 49.Karr, J.R., 1981. Assessment of biotic integrity using fish communities. Fisheries 6, 21–27. 50.Kentucky Transportation Center, 2003. Assessment and Modeling of stream Minigation Procedures, Research Report KTC-03-14/SPR193-98-1F 51.Ladson, A. R., White, L.J.,1999. Development and testing of an Index of Stream Condition for waterway management in Australia. Freshwater Biology 41(2): 453-468 52.Ladson, A.R., White L.J., Doolan, J.A., Finlayson, B.L., HartP, .B.T., Sam, L. Tilleard, J.W., 1999. Development and testing of an Index of Stream Condition for waterway management in Australia. Fresh Water Biology, 41(2):453 53.Lee, A.A., Randall, K., Kress, M.R., 2005. The Use of Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for Long-Term Monitoring on Department of Defense Installations, Federal Facilities Environmental Journal/Spring 2005 54.Legleiter, C.J., Lawrence, R.L., Fonstad, M.A., Marcus, W.A., Aspinall, R. 2003. Fluvial response a decade after wildfire in the northern Yellowstone ecosystem: aspatially explicit analysis. Geomorphology, 54, 119–136. 55.Little, L.S., Edwards, D., Porter, D.E., 1997, Kriging in estuaries: as the crow flies, or as the fish swims?. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 213: 1-11 56.Lotrich, V.A. 1973. Growth, production, and community composition of fishes inhabiting a first-, second- and thirdorder stream of Eastern Kentucky. Ecological Monographs 43: 377–396. 57.Nolan, J.K., Smith, A.J., An expanded rapid bioassessment of the White Creek, Washington County, NY. Rapid Watershed Assessment Program Hudson Basin River Watch, Summer of 2001 58.Nakano, O. 1990. Seasonal, sexual and individual variations in gonad weight and secondary sexual characters of dark chub, Z. temmincki. Jap. J. Ichthyol. 37:246-255 59.Northcote, T.G. 1987. Migratory strategies and production in fresheater fishes. Pp. 326-359. In: S.D. Gerking (ed.) Ecology of Freshwater Fish Production, Halsted Press, New York. 60.Pannatier, Y., VARIOWIN: Software for Spatial Data Analysis in 2D, Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, 1996. 61.Part I: Standard Operating Procedures for Conducting Biomonitoring on Fish Communities in Wadeable Streams in Georgia, Georgia Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Resources Division Fisheries Management Section ,June 1, 2005 62.Person, L.E. 1983. Temporal and spatial variation in coastal macrobenthice in community structure, Hano Bay (Southern Baltic). J Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 68: 227-293. 63.Peterson, E.E., Merton, A.A., Theobald, D.M., Urquhart, N.S., 2006. Patterns of spatial autocorrelation in stream water chemistry. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 121: 571–596 64.Peterson E.E., Theobald, D.M., Ver Hoff, J.M., 2007. Geostatistical modelling on stream networks: developing valid covariance matrices based on hydrologic distance and stream flow. Freshwater Biology 52, 267–279 65.Paller,M.H., Marcel, J.M., Reichert, J.M.D., Seigle, J.C., 2000. Use of fish community data to evaluate restoration success of a riparian stream, Ecological Engineering 15, S171-S187 66.Paller, M.H. 1994. Relationships between fish assemblage structure and stream order in South Carolina coastal plain streams. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 1123: 150–161. 67.Rapid Bioassessment in Wadeable Streams & Rivers by Volunteer Monitors 2006 Summary Report State of Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection 68.Rapid Bioassessment of Combined sewer overflow effects Wabash river, Tippecanoe County, Indiana . http://mem.tcon.net/5012/0614/cso.pdf 69.Rahel, F.J., Hubert, W.A., 1991. Fish assemblages and habitat gradients in a Rocky Mountain- Great Plains stream: biotic zonation and additive patterns of community change. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 120: 319–332. 70.Robinson, J.L, Rand P.S., 2005. Discontinuity in fish assemblages across an elevation gradient in a southern Appalachian watershed, USA. Ecology of Freshwater Fish 14: 14–23. 71.Reyes-Gavila’n, F.G., Garrido, R., Nicieza, A.G., Toledo, M.M., Brana, F., 1996. Fish community variation along physical gradients in short streams of Northern Spain and the disruptive effect of dams. Hydrobiologia 321: 155–163. 72.Schlosser, I.J. 1982. Fish community structure and function along two habitat gradients in a headwater stream. Ecological Monographs 52: 395–414. 73.Suter, G., 1993. Ecological Risk Assessment. Lewis Publishers, Ann Arbor, MI. 74.The use of rapid bioassessment protocols to describe fish and benthic macroinvertebrate communities in three creeks near the little river national wildlife refuge, Mccurtain county, Lklahoma,U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Oklahoma Ecological Services Field Office 222 South Houston, Suite A Tulsa, Oklahoma 74127 June 1997 75.Torgersen C.E., Gresswell, R.E., Bateman, D.S., 2004. Pattern detection in stream networks: quantifying spatial variability in fish distribution. In: Proceedings of the Second Annual International Symposium on GIS/Spatial Analyses in Fishery and Aquatic Sciences (Eds T. Nishida, P.J. Kailola & C.E. Hollingworth), pp. 405–420. Fishery GIS Research Group, Saitama, Japan. 76.U.S. EPA, 1989. In: Plafkin, J.L., Barbour, M.T., Porter, K.D., Gross, S.K., Hughes, R.M. (Eds.), Rapid Bioassessment Protocols For Use in Streams and Wadeable Rivers: Benthic Macroinvertebrates and Fish. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, EPA 440/4-89/001. 77.Vannote, R.L., Wayne Minshall,G., Cummins, K.W., Sedell, J.R., Colbert, E. C., 1980. The river countinuum concept, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 37: 130-137 78.Wang, C.M.J., 1989. Environmental quality and fosh community ecology in an agricultural mountain stream system of Taiwan. Ph.D. Thesis, Iowa state University, Ames. 138pp. 79.Winger, P.V., Lasier, P.J., Bogenrieder, K.J., 2000. Bioassessment of Streams in Thomasville, Thomas County, Georgia, Matt Smith and David Gattie Department of Agricultural Engineering University of Georgia Athens, GA 80.Winger,P.V., Lasier, P.J., Bogenrider, K.J., 2005. Comined use of rapid bioassessment protocols and sediment quality triad to assess strea, quality. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 100: 267-295 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/28578 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 河川生態系統具有多各尺度的特性，當研究的尺度不同時，所呈現的生態系特性亦有所不同。在河川生態學研究中，棲地環境、水質特性與河川生物間的互動關係，是河川生態學研究重要的議題之一，當河川水質影響不大時，棲息地與生物之關係更具重要性。在河川縱向的變化上，微尺度觀測到的為水潭、湍瀨等的變化，魚類則是棲息與覓食的特性；河段尺度與集水區尺度內為溪流水文特性與棲地的連續性，魚類為其遷徙或迴游的特性。本研究以位於台北縣淡水鎮與三芝鄉的大屯溪流域為研究對象，研究地點共15個實驗樣點，全長約為8900公尺。本研究在於：1)溪流快速評估法則應用於大屯溪流域之可行性、2) 河川連續理論驗證大屯溪流域之生物與物理棲地特性、3)水工構造對於魚類之影響、4)大屯溪流域之物理棲息地與生物之時空間變異。本研究應用可跨越性溪流快速生物評估規則(RBP)、生物整合性指標、Shannon-Wiener’s多樣性指數、Pearson相關性分析與空間統計方法及水文距離進行魚類、棲地與兩者間之時空間變異之分析。
生物整合性指標與Shannon-Wiener’s多樣性指數在各季節呈現鐘型分布。物理棲地特性與台灣鏟頷魚之Pearson相關性較明顯，其它魚種則反應不明顯。在變異圖模型內具有多空間尺度特性。微尺度、河段尺度、峰型尺度與集水區尺度分別顯示出了生物與棲地在不同空間尺度內的特性。魚類變異圖結果中，可以發現魚類組成結構隨著季節變動，而影響其分布特性。在棲地特性變異圖結果中，棲地特性因水文距離與水工構造物等的影響，造成在空間分佈特性變異。在生物與棲地所建立之共變異圖結果中，生物整合性指標、魚類數量兩者對於河床基質特性、流速水深比在各季節河段尺度內均呈現正相關。Shannon-Wiener’s多樣性指數與棲地之相關性較不明顯。峰型(Hump-Shape)尺度的發現，顯示當棲地與生物在一相對距離時，仍會具有相同的特性存在。魚類產生峰型尺度的原因為生物的多樣性特性在溪流內是呈現峰型分布的；棲地特性產生峰型尺度可能為棲地受到生態工程整治或河川的復育所造成。由前述的空間變異分析的結果，河川生態系統是具有多各空間尺度特性的，當在進行溪流復育或整治時，多各尺度的考量是必要的。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T00:12:50Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-96-R94622021-1.pdf: 1393407 bytes, checksum: 6c1d85b33231790803de384ba86637bb (MD5) Previous issue date: 2007 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 謝誌……………………………………………………………………I
中文摘要………………………………………………………………II Abstract………………………………………………………………III 目錄……………………………………………………………………IV 圖目錄…………………………………………………………………VI 表目錄……………………………………………………………….VIII 第一章 緒論…………………………………………………………1 1-1研究緣起…………………………………………………………1 1-2研究目的…………………………………………………………2 1-3研究流程圖.…………………………………………………….3 第二章 文獻回顧……………………………………………………4 2-1 溪流連續理論與魚類行為特性……………………………… 4 2-2河川之魚類行為與分布…………………………………………5 2-3生物整合性指標(IBI：Index of Biotic integrity)……. 9 2-4 河溪評估方法.………………………………………………10 2-5 溪流評估方法與生物指標之應用……………………………12 2-6空間自相關與水文距離應用於河川生態系統分析…………15 第三章 理論與方法………………………………………………17 3-1河川連續理論..………………………………………………17 3-2 棲地與生物評估方法……………………………………… 19 3-2-1棲息地評估…………………………………………………20 3-2-2 魚類採集.…………………………………………………24 3-2-3 生物整合性指標………………………………………….25 3-2-4 Shannon-Wiener’s多樣性指數…………………………26 3-2-5 Pearson相關係數…………………………………………26 3-3 空間自相關原理…………………………………………… 27 3-3-1區域化變數理論特性………………………………………27 3-3-2半變異元分析………………………………………………28 3-3-3變異圖理論模式……………………………………………30 3-3-4巢式結構……………………………………………………31 3-3-5變異圖模型的擬和…………………………………………31 3-3-6 水文距離 …………………………………………………32 3-4 研究區域……………………………………………………33 3-4-1大屯溪概述…………………………………………………33 3-4-2 實驗地點 …………………………………………………35 3-4-3 實驗點設置………………………………………………38 第四章 結果與討論.……………………………………………39 4-1生物與物理棲地調查評估結果………………………………39 4-1-1 河川棲地特性評估結果………………………………… 39 4-1-2 魚類資源概述……………………………………………40 4-1-3 生物整合性指標評估……………………………………43 4-1-4 Shannon-Wiener’s 多樣性指標………………………45 4-1-5 Pearson相關性 …………………………………………46 4-2 空間結構分析………………………………………………47 4-2-1 生物條件變異圖…………………………………………47 4-2-2 物理棲地變異圖…………………………………………54 4-2-3 生物與物理棲息之共變異圖… …………………………60 4-2-3-1生物整合性指標與物理棲地特性之共變異圖………60 4-2-3-2 魚類數量與物理棲地特性之共變異圖……………… 64 4-2-3-3 Shannon-Wiener’s指數與物理棲地特性之共變異圖. 67 4-2-3-4日本禿頭鯊與物理棲地特性之共變異圖………………72 第五章 結論………………………………………………………82 5-1結論……………………………………………………………82 5-2 建議…………………………………………………………85 參考文獻…………………………………………………………86 附錄一 大屯溪之魚類…………………………………………93 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.title | 應用空間統計與水文距離於大屯溪魚類與棲地之時空間變異研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Applications of geostatistical analysis and hydrological distance in spatial-temporal variation study of fish assemblage and habitat | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 95-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 李明旭,童慶斌,陳彥璋 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 魚類,物理棲地,河川連續理論,空間統計,水文距離,多尺度, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | fish,habitat,stream continue concept,geostatistics,hydrological distance,multiscale, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 91 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2007-07-28 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 生物環境系統工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 生物環境系統工程學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-96-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.36 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。