請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/28344
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 許添本 | |
dc.contributor.author | Chung-Wen Wang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 王重文 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T00:05:40Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2008-07-31 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2007-07-31 | |
dc.date.issued | 2007 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2007-07-27 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 1. 王義川,號誌化交叉口分流式號誌設計方法之研究,國立台灣大學土木工程研究所碩士論文,民國85年6月
2. 王濟川,Logistic迴歸模型:方法及應用,五南出版社,民國92年 3. 李銷桂,號誌轉換下猶豫區間之研究,國立台灣大學土木工程研究所碩士論文,民國85年6月 4. 林明志,設置機車停等區對號誌化交叉路口之影響評估,國立台灣大學土木工程研究所碩士論文,民國91年6月 5. 林豐福、張開國、張仲杰,號誌設計因素之探討,交通部運研所,民國93年11月 6. 馮輝昇,整合機車流動特性之號誌設計方法與等候佈置方式之研究,國立台灣大學土木工程研究所碩士論文,民國84年6月 7. 劉正旭,號誌化交叉路口黃燈對駕駛者決策行為之研究,國立交通大學土木工程研究所碩士論文,民國82年6月 8. 蔣銘堅,號誌交叉口變換時段駕駛行為調查與分析之研究,交通部運研所,民國91年8月 9. 許書耕、藍武王,不同車輛到達類型之黃燈需時研究,運輸計劃季刊,第三十六卷,第二期,民國96年6月 10. Chang M. S. Carroll J. M. and Alberto J. S. Timing traffic signal change intervals based on driver behavior, TRR 1027,1985 11. Comparative study of advance warning signs at high speed signalized intersections, TRR 1495, 1995 12. David Mahalel and David Zaidel, A probabilistic approach for determining the change interval, TRR1069, 1981 13. Driver decision-making at signalized intersections: an optimization of the yellow timing. Traffic Engng Control 26, 1985 14. Gazis D.C. Chiu Liu and Robert Herman, A review of the yellow interval dilemma, TR PART A VOL.30, 1996 15. Huang X. P. and Prahlad D. P., Simulation-neural network model for evaluating dilemma zone problems at high-speed signalized intersections, TRR1456, 1994 16. Improving dilemma-zone protection of advance detection with advance-warning flashers, TRR1844, 2003 17. Intergreen timings. Traffic Engineering & Control, v 27, n 4, 1986 18. Intersection safety at high-speed signalized intersections: number of vehicles in dilemma zone as potential measure, TRR 1897, 2004 19. Intersection auxiliary signal system. Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering, v 2592, 1995 20. ITE Technical Council Task Force 4TF- I 1994 Determining Vehicle Change and Clearance Intervals, ITE, Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1994 21. Limitation of simultaneous gap out logic, TRB 85th ANNUAL MEETING, 2006 22. Lin F. B., Timing design of signal change intervals, TRR 1069, 1986 23. Lin F. B. Donald Cooke and Sangaranathan Vijayakumar, Utilization and timing of signal change interval, TRR1114, 1987 24. Matson T. M. Smith W. S. and Hurd F. W. Traffic Engineering. McGraw-Hill Book Company Inc., New York,1995 25. New probalistic approach to control dilemma occurrence at signalized intersections, TRB 85th ANNUAL MEETING., 2006 26. Panagiotis Papaioannou, Driver behaviour, dilemma zone and safety effects at urban signalised intersections in Greece. Accident Analysis and Prevention 39, 2006 27. Performance of advance warning for end of green system for high-speed signalized intersections. TRR 1925, 2005 28. Reassessment of the traffic signal change interval. TRR 1069, 1986 29. Robert H. W. and Thomas C. F.A reassessment of the traffic signal change interval, TRR 1069, 1981 30. Safety evaluation of a flashing-green light in a traffic signal. Traffic Engineering & Control, v 26, n 2, 1985 31. System integration and field tests for developing in-vehicle dilemma zone warning system, TRR 1826, 2003 32. The suburban pedestrian crossing dilemma, TR NEWS 164 33. Timing traffic signal change intervals based on driver behavior, TRR 1027, 1985 34. William L. W. Driver behavior during the yellow interval, TRR 644, 1977 35. Zegeer C. V. and Dean R. C. Green-extension systems at high-speed intersections ITE J.48,19-24 36. http://www.motc.gov.tw | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/28344 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 台灣地區之主要道路路口大多已劃設機車停等區,此方式確實提高了路口效率。但道路幾何設計的任何改變都有可能對現有車流造成影響,國內目前並未對設置機車停等區後,對號誌設計做適當之調整,路口號誌延用原有時相長度很可能已經不符合新的道路狀況,為了解路口的改變是否對駕駛者產生影響,進而影響交通行車安全,本研究將利用「猶豫區間」的概念,探討設置與未設置機車停等區車道的駕駛者決策狀況。
由於機車停等區的設置可能造成路口的影響,本研究便針對三個不同道路配置的路口,進行實地的錄影調查分析,並透過調查現況資料建立logistic迴歸模型,構建出駕駛者之選擇決策模式,用以估計駕駛者於各路口選擇通過路口或停止的機率,以作為設計綠燈介間時間長度之依據。所構建之模式並經由相關檢定結果之參數,了解模式之可靠度及正確性,後續再藉由模式計算結果進行分析,配合路口資料分析的結果,進而提出改善方案。 經本研究分析,影響駕駛者是否通過路口的主要顯著變數為車輛速度與黃燈始亮時車輛距停止線距離兩變數。且透過模式結果可以發現,設有機車停等區車道上之車輛於三個調查路口皆有較一般未設置停等區車道上之車輛有更冒險之穿越路口行為。本研究認為,應該利用本研究模式所計算之改善黃燈時間,降低駕駛人冒險穿越路口的機率,並考量路口之停等區深度計算出所實際所需之全紅時間長度,以確保行車安全無虞。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | In recent years, our government placed motorcycle waiting zones on most of the main crossroads in Taiwan. This method indeed raises the efficiency of crossroads. But any change in road design may have an influence on current vehicle flow. We also do not change the signal phase length after placing motorcycle waiting zones. The original phase length may not meet the actual demand of drivers. To figure out if the motorcycle waiting zones affect the drivers or not, we will use the concept of “dilemma zone” to analyze the difference of driver behavior between lanes with a motorcycle waiting zones and lanes without motorcycle waiting zones.
We recorded three crossroads with difference lane numbers and read the data in the videotapes. Through the data read, we make an initial analysis and then build a logistic regression model. The model can tell the probability of a driver that he will choose to cross or stop at the crossroad. We can use the probability to be the basis of setting the intergreen time. According to the analysis result, we know the significant variables are “the distance from the stop line when facing yellow light” and “vehicle speed”. From the data and model, we also find that the drivers on the lanes with motorcycle waiting zones are more aggressive than the drivers on the lanes without motorcycle waiting zones. So we concluded that we should use the modified yellow light phase length to decrease the probability of drivers taking risking crossing the crossroads and use the recommended intergreen time phase length to ensure the safety. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T00:05:40Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-96-R94521524-1.pdf: 1680456 bytes, checksum: 4ecc0ebf20c47eb0b80334780b1ca185 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2007 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論 1
1.1 研究背景 1 1.2 研究動機 2 1.3 研究目的 2 1.4 研究流程 3 1.5 研究方法 5 第二章 文獻回顧 6 2.1 猶豫區間界定方式 6 2.1.1 運動學模式 6 2.1.2 駕駛者行為模式 9 2.2 綠燈介間時間設計方式 11 2.3 探討猶豫區間相關文獻 15 2.4 機車停等區設置方式 18 第三章 研究方法 20 3.1 影響猶豫區間變數之探討 20 3.2 羅吉斯(Logistic)迴歸模型於猶豫區間之應用 23 3.3 羅吉斯(Logistic)迴歸模型說明 25 第四章 資料蒐集與分析 30 4.1 資料蒐集 30 4.2 路口狀況分析 32 4.3 路口車輛停等狀況分析 37 4.4 路口駕駛行為分析 43 4.5 機車停等狀況分析 46 4.6 小結 48 第五章 模式構建 49 5.1 確定相關變數 49 5.2 駕駛者路口選擇機率模式之構建 53 5.3 模式與實際路口狀況之比較 61 5.4 綠燈介間時間長度探討 67 第六章 結論與建議 71 6.1 結論 71 6.2 建議 72 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 設置機車停等區對號誌化交叉路口猶豫區間影響之研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Impact of the Dilemma Zone of Signalized Crossroads by Placing Motorcycle Waiting Zones | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 95-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 吳健生,吳水威 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 猶豫區間,羅吉斯(Logistic)迴歸模型,機車停等區,綠燈介間時間,駕駛者選擇決策模式, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Dilemma zone,Logistic regression model,Motorcycle waiting zone,Intergreen time,Driver decision model, | en |
dc.relation.page | 75 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2007-07-30 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 土木工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 土木工程學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-96-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.64 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。