請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/28331完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 連韻文 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Pei-Pei Liu | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 劉蓓蓓 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T00:05:22Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2009-07-31 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2007-07-31 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2007 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2007-07-29 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 林緯倫、連韻文（2001）。如何能發現隱藏的規則？從科學資優生表現的特色，探索提升規則發現能力的方法。「科學教育學刊」，9，299-322。
陳亦媛（2003）。「兒童歸納推理能力探究－影響兒童證據與假設協調能力的可能原因與解決之道」（未發表之碩士論文）。台北：國立台灣大學心理學研究所。 黃永廣、連韻文、吳昭容、蘇順隆、殷聖楷、楊晰勛等人（2004）。訓練歸納與學習幾何概念的數位環境之鷹架輔助。「全球華人計算機教育應用學報」，2，31-43。 Baddeley, A., & Hitch, G. J. (1974). Working memory. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 8, 47-89. Bayliss, D. M., Jarrold, C., Baddeley, A. D., Gunn, D. M., & Leigh, E. (2005). Mapping the developmental constraints on working memory span performance. Developmental Psychology, 41, 579-597. Bruner, J. S. (1961). The act of discovery. Harvard Educational Review, 31, 21-32. Bruner, J. S., Goodnow, J. J., & Austin, G. A. (1956). A study of thinking. New York: Willy. Case, R., Kurland, D. M., & Goldberg, J. (1982). Operational efficiency and the growth of short-term memory span. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 33, 386-404. Chen, Z., & Klahr, D. (1999). All other things being equal: Children’s acquisition of the control variable strategy. Child Development, 70, 1098-1120. Cheng, P. W. (1997). From covariation to causation: A causal power theory. Psychological Review, 104, 367-405. Cheng, P. W., & Holyoak, K. J. (1995). Complex adaptive systems as intuitive statisticians. Causality, contingency, and prediction. In J. A. Meyer & H. Roitblat (Eds.), Comparative approaches to cognition (pp. 271-302). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Copeland, D. E., & Radvansky, G. A (2004). Working memory and syllogistic reasoning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, 1437-1457. Engle, R. W., Kane, M. J., & Tuholski, S. W. (1999). Working memory and controlled attention. In A. Miyake & P. Shad (Eds.), Models of Working memory: Mechanisms of Active Maintenance and Executive Control (pp. 102-134). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Evans, J. St. B. T. (1989). Bias in human reasoning: Causes and consequences. London: Erlbaum. Evans, J. St. B. T. (2003). In two minds: Dual-process accounts of reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 454-459. Gilhooly, K. J., Logie, R. H., Wetherick, N. E., & Wynn, V. (1993). Working memory and strategies in syllogistic-reasoning tasks. Memory and Cognition, 21, 115-124. Handley, S. J., Capon, A., Beveridge, M., Dennis, I., & Evans, J. (2004). Working memory, inhibitory control and the development of children's reasoning. Thinking and Reasoning, 10, 175-195. Handley, S. J., Capon, A., Copp, C., & Harper, C. (2002). Conditional reasoning and the Tower of Hanoi: The role of spatial and verbal working memory. British Journal of Psychology, 93, 501-518. Hume, D. (1758/1988). An enquiry concerning human understanding. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books. Inhelder, B., & Piaget, J. (1958). The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence. New York: Basic Books. Kaiser, M., McCloskey, M., & Proffitt, D. (1986). Development of intuitive theories of motion. Developmental Psychology, 22, 67-71. Kelley, H. H. (1973). The process of causal attributions. American Psychologist, 28, 107-128. Klaczynski, P. A., & Gordon, D. H. (1996). Self-serving influences on adolescents’ evaluations of belief-relevant evidence. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 62, 317-339. Klahr, D., & Dunbar, K. (1988). Dual space search during scientific reasoning. Cognitive Science, 12, 1-48. Klahr, D., Fay, A., & Dunbar, K. (1993). Heuristics for scientific experimentation: A developmental study. Cognitive Psychology, 25, 111-146. Klayman, J., & Ha, Y. (1987). Confirmation, disconfirmation, and information in hypothesis-testing. Psychological Review, 94, 211-228. Kuhn, D. (1989). Children and adults as intuitive scientists. Psychological Review, 96, 674-689. Kuhn, D. (1995). Microgenetic study of change: What has it told us? Psychological Science, 6, 133-139. Kuhn, D., Amsel, E., & O’Loughlin, M. (1988). The development of scientific thinking skills. Orlando, FL: Academic Press. Kuhn, D., Garcia-Mila, M., Zohar, A., & Anderson, C. (1995). Strategies of knowledge acquisition. Monographs fo the Society for Research in Child Development, 60, 1-128. Kuhn, D., & Phelps, E. (1982). The development of problem-solving strategies. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 17, 1-44. Kuhn, D., Schauble, L., & Garcia-Mila, M. (1992). Cross-domain development of scientific reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 9, 285-327. Kyllonen, P. C., & Christal, R. E. (1990). Reasoning ability is little more than working memory capacity?! Intelligence, 14, 389-433. Markovits, H., Doyon, C., & Simoneau, M. (2002). Individual differences in working memory and conditional reasoning with concrete and abstract content. Thinking and Reasoning, 8, 97-107. Morrison, R. (2005). Thinking in working memory. In K. J. Holyoak & R. G. Morrison (Eds), The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 457-473). Cambridge, US: Cambridge University Press. Nussbaum, J. (1979). Children’s conceptions of the earth as a cosmic body: A cross-age study. Science Education, 63, 83-93. Penner, D., & Klahr, D. (1996). The interaction of domain-specific knowledge and domain-general discovery strategies: A study with sinking object. Child Development, 67, 2709-2727. Richland, L. E., Morrison, R. G., & Holyoak, K. J. (2004). Working memory and inhibition as constraints on children’s development of analogical reasoning. In K. Forbus, D. Gentner, & T. Regier (Eds.), Proceedings of the twenty-sixth annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 1149-1154). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Ruffman, T., Perner, J., Olson, D. R., & M. Doherty. (1989). Reflecting on scientific thinking: Children’s understanding of the hypothesis-evidence relation. Child Development, 64, 1617-1636. Schauble, L. (1990). Belief revision in children: The role of prior knowledge and strategies for generating evidence. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 49, 31-57. Schauble, L. (1996). The development of scientific reasoning in knowledge-rich contexts. Developmental Psychology, 32, 102-119. Schauble, L., & Glaser, R. (1990). Scientific thinking in children and adults. Contributions to Human Development, 21, 9-27. Schauble, L., Klopfer, L., & Raghavan, K. (1991). Students’ transition from an engineering model to a science model of experimentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 859-882. Shaklee, H., & Mims, M. (1981). Development of rule use in judgments of covariation between events. Child Development, 56, 1229-1240. Shaklee, H., & Paszek, D. (1985). Covariation judgment: Systematic rule use in middle childhood. Child Development, 52, 317-325. Shultz, T. R., & Mendelson, R. (1975). The use of covariation as a principle of causal analysis. Child Development, 46, 394-399. Siegler, R. S., & Liebert, R. M. (1975). Acquisition of formal scientific reasoning by 10- and 13- year olds: Designing a factorial experiment. Developmental Psychology, 11, 401-402. Simon, H.A., & Lea, G (1974). Problem solving and rule induction: A unified view. In L. W. Gregg (Eds), Knowledge and cognition (pp. 105-128). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Sodian, B., Zaitchik, D., & Carey, S. (1991). Young children's differentiation of hypothetical beliefs from evidence. Child Development, 62, 753-766. Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1997). Reasoning independently of prior belief and individual differences in actively open-minded thinking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 342-357. Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate. The Behavioral and Brain Science, 23, 645-726. Tschirgi, J. E. (1980). Sensible reasoning: A hypothesis about hypothesis. Child Development, 51, 1-10. Turner, M. L., & Engle, R. W. (1989). Is working memory capacity task dependent? Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 127-154. Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W. F. (1992). Mental models of the earth: A study of conceptual change in childhood. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 535-585. Waltz, J. A., Lau, A., Grewal, S. K., & Holyoak, K. J. (2000). The role of working memory in analogical mapping. Memory and Cognition, 28(7), 1205-1212. Wason, P. C. (1960). On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12, 129-140. Zimmerman, C. (2000). The development of scientific reasoning skills. Developmental Review, 20, 99-149. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/28331 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 在模擬科學發現情境的作業中，受試者必須自行設計實驗加以測試、觀察，並依據實驗結果歸納出新假設或修改既有假設，最終找出影響效果的規則。關於兒童科學推理的研究發現，兒童不但在相同作業中的表現較成人差，在相同練習中的進步亦未如成人明顯而全面。且同年齡兒童在推理作業中的表現存在很大的變異，變異程度甚至隨著發展而提升。而研究也發現工作記憶與許多高階的認知歷程息息相關。因此本研究從工作記憶的觀點，首先探討兒童的科學推理表現與其工作記憶廣度的關係。此外我們嘗試以電腦輔助工具降低練習時的認知負荷量，以期促進兒童的推理發展，並分析其進步程度是否受到工作記憶廣度的影響。兩組五年級學童事先接受工作記憶廣度測量，並分別在高、低負荷量下進行科學推理練習。練習前後皆接受推理能力測量。我們的研究結果發現，工作記憶廣度越大的兒童越可能設計有效的實驗以檢驗假設，而且較能依據證據做出合理的推論。而降低練習時的認知負荷量也使得兒童對於重要實驗策略的掌握有所提升，並且更能考慮實驗證據而做出合理的推論。同時在認知負荷量較高的情況下練習的兒童進步則不明顯。另外，當環境支持兒童的推理發展時，他們的進步程度亦受到工作記憶廣度的限制而有所不同。顯示無論環境的工作記憶需求或個體本身的工作記憶條件都會影響兒童推理的表現與提升。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | In self-directed experimentation tasks, participants have to conduct experiments to infer the relationship between variables and a certain effect. Previous research has shown that in this kind of task, children performed worse and progressed less rapidly than adults. There was also large variability among subjects of the same age. Research has also found that participants reasoned less correctly under high working memory load, and that working memory capacity is an important predictor of performance in deductive reasoning tasks. The main objectives of this research are to investigate the relationship between children’s working memory capacity and their scientific reasoning ability, and the possible influence of cognitive load on practice effect. Two groups of sixteen 5th-graders participated in scientific reasoning exercise under high or low cognitive load respectively; their reasoning abilities were measured both before and after the exercise. The results showed that children with greater capacity were more likely to design controlled experiments, and better coordinate their inferences with collected data. In addition, children exercised under lower cognitive load progressed more significantly in scientific reasoning skills. Meanwhile, only individuals with greater capacity progressed significantly through low load practice. The findings suggest that working memory capacity play an important role in children’s performance and development of scientific reasoning, and that lowering cognitive load during practice facilitate children’s improvement. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T00:05:22Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-96-R94227111-1.pdf: 623573 bytes, checksum: 1f84784e35498ba46369857a098d6620 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2007 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 緒論 …………………………………………………………… 1
科學推理研究回顧 …………………………………………… 2 促進兒童科學推理能力的方法 ……………………………… 14 影響推理表現的重要認知因素－工作記憶 ………………… 17 研究目的與預測 ……………………………………………… 21 研究一 ………………………………………………………… 23 方法 …………………………………………………………… 25 結果 …………………………………………………………… 32 討論 …………………………………………………………… 40 研究二 ………………………………………………………… 43 方法 …………………………………………………………… 46 結果 …………………………………………………………… 49 討論 …………………………………………………………… 58 綜合討論 ……………………………………………………… 63 參考文獻 ……………………………………………………… 68 附錄 …………………………………………………………… 74 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.title | 如何提升兒童的科學推理表現－探討練習時認知負荷量與工作記憶廣度的影響 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Improving Children’s Performance in Scientific Reasoning: The Influences of Individual’s Working Memory Capacity and Cognitive Load during Practice | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 95-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 吳昭容,黃永廣,洪瑞雲 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 科學, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | scientific reasoning,cognitive load,working memory capacity,syllogistic reasoning, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 78 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2007-07-30 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 心理學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 心理學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-96-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 608.96 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。