Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 醫學院
  3. 牙醫專業學院
  4. 臨床牙醫學研究所
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/28299
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor林立德
dc.contributor.authorYen-Ping Leeen
dc.contributor.author李彥平zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-13T00:04:38Z-
dc.date.available2007-08-08
dc.date.copyright2007-08-08
dc.date.issued2007
dc.date.submitted2007-07-29
dc.identifier.citation參考文獻
1. Misch CE. Dental implant prosthetics. St. Louis: Mosby; 2005. p. 130-41.
2. Lekholm U, Zarb GA. Tissue-integrated prostheses : osseointegration in clinical dentistry; 1985.
3. Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Branemark PI. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. International Journal of Oral Surgery 1981;10(6):387-416.
4. Schnitman PA, Rubenstein JE, Whorle PS, DaSilva JD, Koch GG. Implants for partial edentulism. Journal of Dental Education 1988;52(12):725-36.
5. Jemt T, Lekholm U. Implant treatment in edentulous maxillae: a 5-year follow-up report on patients with different degrees of jaw resorption. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 1995;10(3):303-11.
6. Rangert B, Sennerby L, Meredith N, Brunski J. Design, maintenance and biomechanical considerations in implant placement. Dental Update 1997;24(10):416-20.
7. Jaffin RA, Berman CL. The excessive loss of Branemark fixtures in type IV bone: a 5-year analysis. Journal of Periodontology 1991;62(1):2-4.
8. Friberg B, Jemt T, Lekholm U. Early failures in 4,641 consecutively placed Branemark dental implants: a study from stage 1 surgery to the connection of completed prostheses. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 1991;6(2):142-6.
9. Esposito M, Hirsch JM, Lekholm U, Thomsen P. Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants. (I). Success criteria and epidemiology. European Journal of Oral Sciences 1998;106(1):527-51.
10. Esposito M, Hirsch JM, Lekholm U, Thomsen P. Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants. (II). Etiopathogenesis. European Journal of Oral Sciences 1998;106(3):721-64.
11. Bryant SR. The effects of age, jaw site, and bone condition on oral implant outcomes. International Journal of Prosthodontics 1998;11(5):470-90.
12. Herrmann I, Lekholm U, Holm S, Kultje C. Evaluation of patient and implant characteristics as potential prognostic factors for oral implant failures. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 2005;20(2):220-30.
13. Bahat O. Branemark system implants in the posterior maxilla: clinical study of 660 implants followed for 5 to 12 years. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 2000;15(5):646-53.
14. Strietzel FP, Nowak M, Kuchler I, Friedmann A. Peri-implant alveolar bone loss with respect to bone quality after use of the osteotome technique: results of a retrospective study. Clinical Oral Implants Research 2002;13(5):508-13.
15. Orenstein IH, Tarnow DP, Morris HF, Ochi S. Factors affecting implant mobility at placement and integration of mobile implants at uncovering. Journal of Periodontology 1998;69(12):1404-12.
16. Truhlar RS, Orenstein IH, Morris HF, Ochi S. Distribution of bone quality in patients receiving endosseous dental implants. Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery 1997;55(12 Suppl 5):38-45.
17. Bischof M, Nedir R, Szmukler-Moncler S, Bernard J-P, Samson J. Implant stability measurement of delayed and immediately loaded implants during healing. Clinical Oral Implants Research 2004;15(5):529-39.
18. Johansson C, Albrektsson T. Integration of screw implants in the rabbit: a 1-year follow-up of removal torque of titanium implants. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 1987;2(2):69-75.
19. Friberg B, Sennerby L, Meredith N, Lekholm U. A comparison between cutting torque and resonance frequency measurements of maxillary implants. A 20-month clinical study. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery 1999;28(4):297-303.
20. Meredith N. Assessment of implant stability as a prognostic determinant. International Journal of Prosthodontics 1998;11(5):491-501.
21. Beer A, Gahleitner A, Holm A, Birkfellner W, Homolka P. Adapted preparation technique for screw-type implants: explorative in vitro pilot study in a porcine bone model. Clinical Oral Implants Research 2007;18(1):103-7.
22. da Cunha HA, Francischone CE, Filho HN, de Oliveira RCG. A comparison between cutting torque and resonance frequency in the assessment of primary stability and final torque capacity of standard and TiUnite single-tooth implants under immediate loading. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 2004;19(4):578-85.
23. Al-Nawas B, Wagner W, Grotz KA. Insertion torque and resonance frequency analysis of dental implant systems in an animal model with loaded implants. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 2006;21(5):726-32.
24. Olive J, Aparicio C. Periotest method as a measure of osseointegrated oral implant stability. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 1990;5(4):390-400.
25. Derhami K, Wolfaardt JF, Faulkner G, Grace M. Assessment of the periotest device in baseline mobility measurements of craniofacial implants. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 1995;10(2):221-9.
26. Meredith N, Friberg B, Sennerby L, Aparicio C. Relationship between contact time measurements and PTV values when using the Periotest to measure implant stability. International Journal of Prosthodontics 1998;11(3):269-75.
27. Tricio J, van Steenberghe D, Rosenberg D, Duchateau L. Implant stability related to insertion torque force and bone density: An in vitro study. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1995;74(6):608-12.
28. Sullivan DY, Sherwood RL, Collins TA, Krogh PH. The reverse-torque test: a clinical report. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 1996;11(2):179-85.
29. Meredith N, Alleyne D, Cawley P. Quantitative determination of the stability of the implant-tissue interface using resonance frequency analysis. Clinical Oral Implants Research 1996;7(3):261-7.
30. Meredith N, Book K, Friberg B, Jemt T, Sennerby L. Resonance frequency measurements of implant stability in vivo. A cross-sectional and longitudinal study of resonance frequency measurements on implants in the edentulous and partially dentate maxilla. Clinical Oral Implants Research 1997;8(3):226-33.
31. Salvi GE, Lang NP. Diagnostic parameters for monitoring peri-implant conditions. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 2004;19 Suppl:116-27.
32. Balshi SF, Allen FD, Wolfinger GJ, Balshi TJ. A resonance frequency analysis assessment of maxillary and mandibular immediately loaded implants. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 2005;20(4):584-94.
33. Barewal RM, Oates TW, Meredith N, Cochran DL. Resonance frequency measurement of implant stability in vivo on implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 2003;18(5):641-51.
34. Becker W, Sennerby L, Bedrossian E, Becker BE, Lucchini JP. Implant stability measurements for implants placed at the time of extraction: a cohort, prospective clinical trial. Journal of Periodontology 2005;76(3):391-7.
35. Degidi M, Piattelli A, Iezzi G, Carinci F. Retrospective study of 200 immediately loaded implants retaining 50 mandibular overdentures. Quintessence International 2007;38(4):281-8.
36. Schincaglia GP, Marzola R, Scapoli C, Scotti R. Immediate loading of dental implants supporting fixed partial dentures in the posterior mandible: a randomized controlled split-mouth study--machined versus titanium oxide implant surface. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 2007;22(1):35-46.
37. Wang H-L, Ormianer Z, Palti A, Perel ML, Trisi P, Sammartino G. Consensus conference on immediate loading: the single tooth and partial edentulous areas. Implant Dentistry 2006;15(4):324-33.
38. Trisi P, Rao W. Bone classification: clinical-histomorphometric comparison. Clinical Oral Implants Research 1999;10(1):1-7.
39. Norton MR, Gamble C. Bone classification: an objective scale of bone density using the computerized tomography scan. Clinical Oral Implants Research 2001;12(1):79-84.
40. Aranyarachkul P, Caruso J, Gantes B, Schulz E, Riggs M, Dus I, et al. Bone density assessments of dental implant sites: 2. Quantitative cone-beam computerized tomography. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 2005;20(3):416-24.
41. Nkenke E, Hahn M, Weinzierl K, Radespiel-Troger M, Neukam FW, Engelke K. Implant stability and histomorphometry: a correlation study in human cadavers using stepped cylinder implants. Clinical Oral Implants Research 2003;14(5):601-9.
42. Schliephake H, Sewing A, Aref A. Resonance frequency measurements of implant stability in the dog mandible: experimental comparison with histomorphometric data. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery 2006;35(10):941-6.
43. Ueda M, Matsuki M, Jacobsson M, Tjellstrom A. Relationship between insertion torque and removal torque analyzed in fresh temporal bone. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 1991;6(4):442-7.
44. Niimi A, Ozeki K, Ueda M, Nakayama B. A comparative study of removal torque of endosseous implants in the fibula, iliac crest and scapula of cadavers: preliminary report. Clinical Oral Implants Research 1997;8(4):286-9.
45. Lindh C, Petersson A, Rohlin M. Assessment of the trabecular pattern before endosseous implant treatment: diagnostic outcome of periapical radiography in the mandible. Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology & Endodontics 1996;82(3):335-43.
46. Stoppie N, Pattijn V, Van Cleynenbreugel T, Wevers M, Vander Sloten J, Ignace N. Structural and radiological parameters for the characterization of jawbone. Clinical Oral Implants Research 2006;17(2):124-33.
47. Homolka P, Beer A, Birkfellner W, Nowotny R, Gahleitner A, Tschabitscher M, et al. Bone mineral density measurement with dental quantitative CT prior to dental implant placement in cadaver mandibles: pilot study. Radiology 2002;224(1):247-52.
48. Lindh C, Petersson A, Klinge B, Nilsson M. Trabecular bone volume and bone mineral density in the mandible. Dento-Maxillo-Facial Radiology 1997;26(2):101-6.
49. Todisco M, Trisi P. Bone mineral density and bone histomorphometry are statistically related. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 2005;20(6):898-904.
50. Rebaudi A, Koller B, Laib A, Trisi P. Microcomputed tomographic analysis of the peri-implant bone. International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry 2004;24(4):316-25.
51. Trisi P, Rebaudi A, Calvari F, Lazzara RJ. Sinus graft with biogran, autogenous bone, and PRP: a report of three cases with histology and micro-CT. International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry 2006;26(2):113-25.
52. Johansson P, Strid K-G. Assessment of bone quality from cutting resistance during implant surgery International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 1994 9(3):279 - 88
53. Beer A, Gahleitner A, Holm A, Tschabitscher M, Homolka P. Correlation of insertion torques with bone mineral density from dental quantitative CT in the mandible. Clinical Oral Implants Research 2003;14(5):616-20.
54. Ikumi N, Tsutsumi S. Assessment of correlation between computerized tomography values of the bone and cutting torque values at implant placement: a clinical study. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 2005;20(2):253-60.
55. Melamed EA, Schon LC, Myerson MS, Parks BG. Two modifications of the Weil osteotomy: analysis on sawbone models. Foot & Ankle International 2002;23(5):400-5.
56. Caglar YS, Torun F, Pait TG, Hogue W, Bozkurt M, Ozgen S. Biomechanical comparison of inside-outside screws, cables, and regular screws, using a sawbone model. Neurosurgical Review 2005;28(1):53-8.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/28299-
dc.description.abstract判斷植牙區骨質對於擬定人工牙根治療計畫有關鍵性的影響。但是時至今日,臨床上仍未有ㄧ安全有效而客觀的標準來判斷植牙區骨質的良劣。
本實驗的目的是試圖建立起切削阻力與人造骨塊密度的關連性,以供臨床上骨質判斷的參考。實驗方法是使用3.3釐米的攻螺釘在不同密度的人造骨塊上攻螺紋,將攻螺紋時的切削阻力記錄下來,分析切削阻力與人造骨密度的關係。均質骨塊密度共有五種,每種以三種不同的扭力設定20Ncm、30Ncm以及50Ncm攻螺紋。不同密度組合成的非均質骨塊共有六種,用以模擬臨床上不同的皮質骨與髓質骨組合,均以扭力設定50Ncm攻螺紋,每一樣本攻螺紋五次。
得到的切削阻力以作圖、平均以及估計斜率等方式得到每一種骨質切削阻力的特性。再用變異數分析、獨立樣本t-檢定以及複迴歸分析,檢定每一特性與骨質密度的關係。另外請四位手術醫師對不同骨質組合做測試,就醫師主觀的手感與切削阻力得到的結果作一比較。
結論是切削阻力與骨質密度的確有關聯性。骨質為均質或非均質可以由切削阻力平均-記錄點的圖形判斷出來。均質骨骨質可以由記錄到的切削阻力平均或是曲線上升斜率判斷,密度越大平均值越高,斜率越大。非均質骨的表層骨質可以藉由一般均質骨的方式來判斷,裏層骨質可以由曲線上升斜率來做推測。利用切削阻力的平均可以將均質骨以及非均質骨做一密度上的排列。以不同的手機對不同骨質做切削阻力的測試,需要校正。以機器所得到的切削阻力判斷骨質,要比手術醫師主觀的手感來的準確。臨床上以切削阻力判斷骨質應該是一個可行的方式。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractCorrectly classifying the bone quality of possible implantation area is of great importance in treatment planning.However, until very recently, a way to objectively, safely, and effeciently judging bone quality is still lacking.
The purpose of this study is trying to figure out the correlation between cutting resistance and the density of artificial bone block for further clinicalutilization. By tapping with 3.3mm screw tap on different bone blocks with various denity, data of cutting resistance was collected for analyzation. Five homogeneous bone blocks were chosen, all was tapped with 20Ncm, 30Ncm, and 50Ncm of torque. Six different types of inhomogeneous bone blocks, which were combinations of different homogeneous bone blocks, were designed to mimic the various combinations of cancellous bone and cortical bone. All the six combination of bone blocks were tapped with 50Ncm of torque. Each of the sample was repeatedly tapped for five times.
The data collected were analyzed by several stastistic methods to characterize different density of bone blocks by cutting resistance. Then ANOVA, t-test, and multiple regression analysis were utilized for further analysis. Four surgen were invited to tapping on bone-block-combinations, to verify subjective feeling from cutting resistance.
The conclusion of this study is that, there really is correlation between cutting resistance and bone density. There is differences between curves of homogeneous and inhomogemeous density. In the curve of homogeneous test blocks, the higher the density, the higher the cutting resistance, as well as the slope of the curve rises. For inhomogeneous density, the outer bone is similar to general homogeneous blocks, and the inner bone can be speculated by the slope of the rising curve. Both homogeneous and inhomogeneous bone can be ranked by average cutting resistance. Verification is needed for different handpiece. Comparisons between subjective feeling of surgeons and objective cutting resistance records, the later is more accurate. Therefore, clinically, it might be able to verify various bone density with cutting resistance.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T00:04:38Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-96-R93422013-1.pdf: 2917747 bytes, checksum: 654362e5234396e1d5b7a7d887918bc5 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2007
en
dc.description.tableofcontents目 錄
圖 目 錄 6
表 目 錄 10
壹、前言 13
貳、文獻回顧 14
1、骨質密度的分類 14
2、不同骨質的植牙成功率 15
3、骨質對植牙術式的影響 16
3.1初期穩定度 16
3.2 立即受力 19
4、骨質密度的量測法 20
4.1 手感 20
4.2 組織型態測量法(histomorphometry) 20
4.3 移除扭力 20
4.4 放射線檢查 21
4.5 切削阻力(cutting resistance) 22
參、實驗目的 24
肆、前導實驗 25
1、實驗目的 25
2、材料與方法 25
3、實驗結果 26
伍、主實驗 28
1、實驗材料 28
2、實驗方法 28
2.1人造骨樣本的製備 28
2.2、鑽孔的順序 28
2.3、不同臨床狀況的模擬 29
2.4、不同手術醫師的比較 29
2.5、切削阻力的量測與分析 30
2.6統計方法 30
陸、結果 31
1敘述性統計 31
1.1均質骨 31
1.2不同手機 31
1.3非均質骨 32
2切削阻力特性分析 32
2.1均質骨 32
2.2不同手機 34
2.3非均質骨 35
2.4綜合分析 36
2.5不同手術醫師測試 37
柒、討論 38
1. 實驗設計 38
1.1 攻螺釘的選擇 38
1.2 人造骨的選擇 38
2. 均質骨的切削阻力 38
3.不同手機 40
4.非均質骨 41
5.綜合分析 42
6.不同手術醫師的測試 43
捌、結論 44
玖、未來研究展望 45
參考文獻 141
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.title以3.3釐米攻螺釘分析人造骨密度與切削阻抗之關係zh_TW
dc.titleAnalyzing the Correlation between Density of Artificial Bone and Profile of Cutting Resistance with 3.3 mm Screw Tapen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear95-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee蕭裕源,洪志遠,郭生興
dc.subject.keyword牙科,骨內植體,攻螺釘,切削阻力,骨質,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordimplant,cutting resistance,screw tap,bone density,en
dc.relation.page145
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2007-07-30
dc.contributor.author-college醫學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept臨床牙醫學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:臨床牙醫學研究所

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-96-1.pdf
  目前未授權公開取用
2.85 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved