Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 公共衛生學院
  3. 健康政策與管理研究所
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/27959
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor吳淑瓊(Shwu-Chong Wu)
dc.contributor.authorGuey-Ing Dayen
dc.contributor.author戴桂英zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-12T18:30:12Z-
dc.date.available2009-08-08
dc.date.copyright2007-08-08
dc.date.issued2007
dc.date.submitted2007-08-02
dc.identifier.citation英文文獻
Aday LA, Andersen RM. A framework for the study of access to medical care. Health Serv Res. 1974;9:208-20.
Andersen RM. A behavioral model of families’ use of health services. Center for Health Administration Studies University of Chicago. 1968.
Andersen RM. Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: Does it matter? Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 1995;36:1-10.
Andrews JA, Manthorpe J, Watson R. Involving older people in intermediate care. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2004;46:303-10.
Angelelli J, Gifford D, Intrator O, Gozalo P, Laliberte L, Mor V. Access to postacute nursing home care before and after the Balanced Budget Act. Health Affairs. 2002;21:254-64.
Bass DM, Noelker LS. The influence of family caregivers on elder’s use of in-home services:an expanded conceptual framework. Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 1987;28:184-96.
Bass DM, Looman WJ, Ehrlich P. Predicting the volume of health and social services: integrating cognitive impairment into the modified Andersen framework. The Gerontologist. 1992;32:33-43.
Blewett LA, Kane RL, Finch M. Hospital ownership of post-acute care: does it increase access to post-acute services? Inquiry. 1995;32:457-67.
Brown RD, Ransom J, Hass S, Petty GW, O’Fallon WM, Whisnant JP, Leibson CL. Use of nursing home after stroke and dependence on stroke severity- a population-based analysis. Stroke. 1999;30:924-9.
Buntin MB, Escarce JJ, Hoverman C, Paddock SM, Totten ME, Wynn BO. Effects of payment changes on trends in access to post-acute care. Santa Monica: Rand Corporation, 2005. Available at: http://www.rand.org/publications/TR/TR259/. Accessed Dec 2, 2005
CDC(USA). Postacute Care Definition. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/datawh/nchsdefs/postacutecare.htm. Accessed May 2, 2007
Chen Q, Kane RL, Finch M. The cost-effectiveness of post-acute care for elderly Medicare beneficiaries. Inquiry. 2000;37:359–75.
Chuang KY, Wu SC, Chen YH, Dai YT, Ma AH. Post-hospital care of stroke patients in Taipei: use of services and policy implications. Health Policy. 2007;82:28-36.
Chuang KY, Wu SC, Ma AH, Chen YH, Wu CL. Identifying factors associated with hospital readmissions among stroke patients in Taipei. J. of Nursing Research. 2005;13:117-28.
CMS. Your Medicare Benefits, 2004. Available at: http://www.cms.hhs.gov.
CMS. Medicare and you, 2006. Available at: http://www.medicare.gov/Publications/Pubs/pdf/10050.pdf. Accessed Nov 24, 2006.
CMS. Medicare premiums and coinsurance rates for 2006. Available at: http://questions.medicare.gov/cgi-bin/medicare.cfg/php/enduser/std_alp.php. Accessed April 25, 2006.
Cohen MA, Tumlinson A. Understanding the State variation in Medicare home health care: the impact of Medicaid program characteristics, State policy and provider attributes. Med Care. 1997;35:618-33.
Collin C, Wade DT, Davies S, and Horne V. The Barthel ADL Index: a reliability study. International Disability Studies. 1988;10:61-3.
Cotterill PG, Gage BJ. Overview: Medicare post-acute care since the Balanced Budget Act of 1997. Health Care Financ Rev. 2002;24:1-6.
Cromwell J, Donoghue S, Gilman BH. Expansion of Medicare's definition of post-acute care transfers. Health Care Financ Rev. 2002;24:95-113.
Department of Health. Intermediate care. London: Department of Health, 2001. Health Service Circular 2001/01.Available at: www.doh.gov.uk/intermediatecare/index.htm. Accessed Nov 24, 2005
Dalton K, Howard HA. Market entry and exit in long-term care: 1985-2000. Health Care Financ Rev. 2002;24:17-32.
Dodel RC, Haacke C, Zamzow K, Paweilik S, Spottke A, Rethfeldt M, Siebert U, Oertel WH, Schoffski O, Back T. Resource utilization and costs of stroke unit care in Germany. Value Health. 2004;7:144-52.
Evers SM, Ament AJ, Blaauw G. Economic evaluation in stroke research: a systematic review. Stroke. 2000;31:1046-53.
Gage B. The Balanced Budget Act:implications for post-acute services. 1998 New York: The Commonwealth Fund.
Gage B. Impact of the BBA on Post-acute Utilization. Health Care Financ Rev. 1999;20:103–26.
Gerzeli S, Tarricone R, Zolo P, Colanqelo I, Busca MR, Gandolfo C. The economic burden of stroke in Italy. The EcLIPSE Study: Economic Longitudinal Incidence-based Project for Stroke Evaluation. Neurol Sci. 2005;26:72-80.
Gilman BH, Cromwell J, Adamache KW, Donoghue S. A final report to HCFA-Study of the effect of implementing the postacute care transfer policy under the inpatient prospective payment system, 2. Descriptive analysis of PAC policy change. Health Care Financing Administration. 2000, p.2-9, 2-11.
Gooding J, Jette AM. Hospital Readmissions among the elderly. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 1985;33:595-601.
Gornick M, Hall MJ. Trends in Medicare use of post-hospital care. Health Care Financ Rev. 1988(suppl):27-38.
Gresham GE, Duncan PW, Stason WB, et al. Post-stroke rehabilitation: assessment, referral, and patient management. Clinical practice guideline. Quick reference guide for clinicians. No.16. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research(AHCPR). 1995;Pub. No. 95-0663.
Guterman S, Eggers PW, Riley G., Greene TF, Terrell SA. The first 3 years of Medicare prospective payment: an overview. Health Care Financ Rev. 1988;9:67-77.
Health Care Financ Rev. Medicare and Medicaid Statistical Supplement 2004. p.160-1,194,210
Health Care Financ Rev. Medicare and Medicaid Statistical Supplement 2005.
Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada. The growing burden of heart disease and stroke in Canada 2003. Ottawa. Available at: http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/ccdpc-cpcmc/cvd-mcv.
Huang ZS, Chiang TL, Lee TK. Stroke prevalence in Taiwan:findings from the 1994 National Health Interview Survey. Stroke. 1997;28:1579-84.
Johnson M, Holthaus D, Harvell J, Coleman E, Eilertsen T, Kramer A. Medicare post-acute care: quality measurement (final Report). U.S. Department of Health and Human Service, Office of Disability, Aging and Long-Term Care Policy, 2002. Available at: http://aspe.hhs.gov/daltcp/reports/mpacqmes.htm. Accessed Nov 24, 2005.
Kane RL. Changing the face of LTC. In: Proceedings of the symposium on meeting the challenges of long-term care system: global experiences and Taiwanese paradigms. Taipei: DOH, 2003, p. 55-62.
Kane RL. Changing the face of long-term care. Journal of Aging & Social Policy. 2005;17:1-18.
Kane RL, Kane RA. Long-term care. JAMA. 1995;273:1690-1.
Kane RL, Finch M, Blewett L, Chen Q, Burns R, Moskowitz M. Use of post-hospital care by Medicare patients. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 1996;44:242–50.
Kane RL, Chen Q, Finch M, Blewett L, Burns R, Moskowitz M. The optimal outcomes of post-hospital care under Medicare. Health Serv Res. 2000;35:615-61.
Kane RL, Lin WC, Blewett LA. Geographic variation in the use of post-acute care. Health Serv Res. 2002;37:667-82.
Katz PR, Kane RL, Mezey MD. Emerging Systems in Long-term Care. NY:Springer, 1999.
Keith RA, Wilson DB, Gutierrez P. Acute and subacute rehabilitation for stroke: a comparison. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995;76:495-500.
Kenney GM, Dubay LC. Explaining area variation in the use of Medicare home health services. Med Care. 1992;30:43-57.
Komisar HL. Rolling back Medicare home health. Health Care Financ Rev. 2002;24:33-55.
Konstam V, Salem D, Pouleur H, Kostis J, Gorkin L, Shumaker S, Mottard I, Woodes P, Konstam MA, Yusuf S. Baseline quality of life as a predictor of mortality and hospitalization in 5025 patients with congestive heart failure. American Journal of Cardiology. 1996;78:890-5.
Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Kollen BJ, Lankhorst GJ. Predicting disability in stroke-a critical review of the literature. Age Ageing. 1996;25:479-89.
Lee AJ, Ellis RP, Merrill AR. Bundling post-acute care with Medicare DRG Payments: an exploration of the distributional and risk consequences. Inquiry 1996;33:283-91.
Lee AJ, Huber J, Stason WB. Poststroke rehabilitation in older Americans: the Medicare experience. Med Care. 1996;34:811-25.
Levenson SA. Subacute settings: making the most of a new model of care. Geriatrics. 1998;53:69-75.
Levi SJ. Post-hospital setting, resource utilization, and self-care outcome in older women with hip fracture. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;78:973-9.
Lin JH, Hsiao SF, Liu CK, Lin YT. Rehabilitation fees, length of stay and effiency for hospitalized stroke patients: a preliminary study based on function related groups. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2001;17:475-83.
Lin JH, Hsieh CL, Lo SK, Hsiao SF, Huang MH. Prediction of functional outcomes in stroke inpatients receiving rehabilitation. J Formos Med Assoc. 2003;102:695-700.
Lin JH, Tsai YJ, Lo SK, Chang JJ, Huang MH. Predicting the grade of disability 1 year after stroke following rehabilitation. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2005;21:212-9.
Liu K, Baseggio C, Wissoker D, Maxwell S, Haley J, Long S. Long-term care hospitals under Medicare: facility-level characteristics. Health Care Financ Rev. 2001;23:1-18.
Liu K, Gage B, Harvell J, Stevenson D, Brennan N. Medicare's post-acute care benefits: background, trends, and issues to be faced. 1999. US Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation. Available at: http://aspe.hhs.gov/daltcp/reports/mpacb.htm. Accessed Nov 24, 2005
Liu K, Wissoker D, Rimes C. Determinants and costs of Medicare post-acute care provided by SNFs and HHAs. Inquiry. 1998;35:49-61.
Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Fountional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Maryland State Med J. 1965;14:62-65.
Mamon J, Steinwachs DM, Fahey M et al. Impact of discharge planning on meeting patients needs after returning home. Health Serv Res. 1992;27:155-75.
Manton KG, Woodbury MA, Vertrees JC, Stallard E. Use of Medicare services before and after introduction of the prospective payment system. Health Serv Res 1993;28:269-92.
Martinez-Vila E, Irimia P. The cost of stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2004;17(suppl. 1):124-9
Medicare Payment Advisory Commission. Report to the Congress: Medicare Payment Policy. Washington DC: MedPAC, 1999.
Medicare Payment Advisory Commission. Report to the Congress: Medicare Payment Policy. Washington DC: MedPAC, 2000.
Medicare Payment Advisory Commission. Report to the Congress: Medicare Payment Policy. 6. Prospective payment for post-acute care:current issues and long-term agenda. Washington DC: MedPAC, 2001;87-107.
Medicare Payment Advisory Commission. Report to the Congress: Medicare Payment Policy. Washington DC: MedPAC, 2003.
Medicare Payment Advisory Commission. Report to the Congress: Medicare Payment Policy. Washington DC: MedPAC, 2004.
Medicare Payment Advisory Commission. A data book: health care spending and the Medicare program. Washington DC: MedPAC, 2004;139-54.
Medicare Payment Advisory Commission. A data book: health care spending and the Medicare program. Washington DC: MedPAC, 2005;149-66.
Medicare Payment Advisory Commission. Report to the Congress: Medicare payment policy. Washington DC: MedPAC, 2006;171-2.
Morrisey MA, Sloan FA, Valvona J. Medicare prospective payment and post-hospital transfers to subacute care. Med Care. 1988;26:685-98.
Neu, CR, Harrison S, Heilbrunn JZ. Medicare patients and postacute care: Who goes where? Santa Monica CA: The RAND Corporation, 1989.
OECD. Caring for frail elderly people: Policies in evolution. Paris: OECD.
Paton JM, Fahy MA, Livingston GA. Delayed discharge--a solvable problem? The place of intermediate care in mental health care of older people. Aging Ment Health. 2004;8:34-9.
Prospective Payment Assessment Commission (ProPAC). Report to the Congress. Medicare and the American health care system. Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1996.
Prospective Payment Assessment Commission (ProPAC). Report to the Congress. Medicare and the American health care system. Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. 1997.
Rossnagel K, Nolte CH, Muller-Nordhorn J, Jungehulsing GJ, Selim D, Bruggenjurgen B, Villringer A, Willich SN. Medical resource use and costs of health care after acute stroke in Germany. Eur J Neurol. 2005;12:862-8.
Roth EJ, Lovell L, Harvey RL, Bode RK, Heinemann AW. Stroke rehabilitation: indwelling urinary catheters, enteral feeding tubes, and tracheostomies are associated with resource use and functional outcomes. Stroke. 2002;33:1845-50.
Schmahl W, Rothgang H. Long-term care: economic issues and policy solutions, 10. The long-term costs of public long-term care insurance in Germany. edited by Eisen R, Sloan FA. Boston MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers. p.183. 1996.
Shah S, Vanclay F, Cooper B. Improving the sensitivity of the Barthel Index for stroke rehabilitation. J Clin Epidemiol. 1989;42:703-9.
Shatto A. Comparing Medicare beneficiaries, by type of post-acute care received: 1999. Health Care Financ Rev. 2002;24:137-42.
Shwartz M, Iezzoni LI, Moskowitz MA, Ash AS, Sawitz E. The importance of comorbidities in explaining differences in patient costs. Med Care. 1996;34:767-82
Spieler JF, Lanoe JL, Amarenco P. Socioeconomic aspects of postacute care for patients with brain infarction in France. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2002;13:132-41.
Spieler JF, Lanoe JL, Amarenco P. Costs of stroke care according to handicap levels and stroke subtypes. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2004;17:134-42.
Steiner A, Neu CR. Monitoring the changes in use of Medicare posthospital services. Report prepared for the Health Care Financing Administration. Santa Monica, CA: The RAND Corporation. 1993.
Steiner A. Intermediate care--a good thing? Age Ageing. 2001;30(Suppl3):33-9.
Stewart DG. Stroke rehabilitation 1. Epidemiologic aspects and acute management. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999;80:s4-7.
Tseng KH, Wu TY. Characteristics of urbanization level in Taiwan districts. Geographical Research. 1986;12:287-323.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2004 CMS Statistics. Washington DC:CMS, 2004;34.
Welch WP. Bundled Medicare Payment for Acute and Postacute Care. Health Affairs. 1998;17:69–81.

中文文獻
內政部社會司:台閩地區老人安養護及長期照護資源分布表(2005年)。http://sowf.moi.gov.tw/04/07/老人安養護及長期照護資源分布表9412.xls。 引用2006/8/6。
中央健康保險局:Tw-DRGs。http://nhi.gov.tw. 引用2007/5/16。
行政院:「我國長期照顧十年計畫」背景說明, http://info.gio.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=32293&ctNode=3764. 引用2007/5/16。
行政院主計處:民國89年戶口及住宅普查報告, http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=557&ctNode=3272. 引用2007/5/16。
行政院經濟建設委員會:中華民國台灣地區民國95至140年人口推計,2006。
行政院衛生署:公共衛生年報,2006。
行政院衛生署:中華民國94年衛生統計系列(全民健康保險醫療統計年報上巻),2007。
行政院衛生署:台閩地區護理之家資源分布表。http://www.doh.gov.tw/ufile/Doc/950728公告上網.xls. 引用2006/8/6。
行政院衛生署國民健康局:台灣地區中老年身心社會與生活狀況長期追蹤調查報告,2006。
吳肖琪、林麗嬋、藍忠孚、吳義勇:全民健保實施後急性病床住院病患超長住院情形之分析。中華衛誌 1998;17:139-146。
吳淑瓊、呂寶靜、林惠生、金惠民、胡名霞、張明正、張媚、莊坤洋、莊義利、莊坤洋、羅均令:全國長期照護需要評估—行政院衛生署90年度委託研究計畫成果報告。行政院衛生署委託,2002。
吳淑瓊、呂寶靜、林惠生、金惠民、胡名霞、張明正、張媚、莊坤洋、莊義利、莊坤洋、羅均令:全國長期照護需要評估第二年計畫—行政院衛生署91年度委託研究計畫成果報告。行政院衛生署委託,2003。
吳淑瓊、呂寶靜、王正、莊坤洋、張媚、戴玉慈:建構長期照護體系先導計畫92年度計畫報告。內政部委託研究計畫報告,2003。
吳淑瓊、王正、呂寶靜、莊坤洋、張媚、莊坤洋、曹愛蘭、陳正芬等:建構長期照護體系先導計畫第三年報告書。內政部委託研究計畫報告,2003。
吳淑瓊等:長期照護機構人力及設施調查-社區式和居家式長期照護機構調查報告。建構長期照護先導計畫第三年計畫期末報告,2002。
吳淑瓊等:全國長期照護評估調查-50歲以上失能者與其照顧者之健康照護現況分析。行政院衛生署委託研究計畫報告,2004。
吳淑瓊、徐慧娟、莊媖智、張明正:功能評估在估計台灣社區老人長期照護需要之應用。中華衛誌 1996;15:533-45。
李怡娟:城鄉社區老人使用居家護理服務情形及其預測因子之探討。護理研究 1997;5:127-36。
李怡真:影響老人接受居家照護服務之直接與間接因素。台北:台北醫學院公共衛生學研究所碩士論文,2000。
李建嶢:影響身心功能障礙者使用機構式服務之因素。台北:國立臺灣大學衛生政策與管理研究所碩士論文,2002。
林季萍:腦出血和腦梗塞病人醫療和照護費用之比較研究。高雄:高雄醫學院公共衛生學研究所碩士論文,1999。
張文瓊:中風病人出院後之長期照護安排。台北:國立臺灣大學衛生政策與管理研究所碩士論文,2001。
張佳琪、黃文鴻:健保支付制度對全髖及全膝關節置換手術醫療利用情形之影響。台灣衛誌 2001;20:440-50。
張梅蘭:復健出院病患出院一年內居家照顧需求的調查研究。中華民國物理治療學會雜誌 1993;18:1-18。
許振榮:腦中風之疾病成本。台北:國立臺灣大學醫療機構管理研究所碩士論文,2001。
陳惠玲:全民健康保險居家照護病患整體醫療利用及其影響因子之探討-以高屏分局為例。高雄:高雄醫學大學公共衛生學研究所碩士論文,2004。
陳瀅淳、徐蓉生、吳麗芬:中部地區腦中風出院患者後續照護現況之探討。長期照護雜誌 2001;5:96-107。
梁忠詔、簡世霖、宋英聖、范文光、王舜光、楊士賢:台灣東部某醫學中心復健科病患長期住院因素之探討。慈濟醫學 2004;16:99-109。
葉湘芬:出院後老人居家護理服務利用與安置狀況預測因子之探討-以內科病人為例。林口:長庚大學護理學研究所碩士論文,1999。
廖述漙:台灣鄉村地區腦血管疾病病患照護成本初探--以某地區教學醫院為例。台北:國立陽明大學公共衛生學研究所碩士論文,2000。
廖建彰、李采娟、林瑞雄、宋鴻樟:2000年台灣腦中風發生率與盛行率的城鄉差異。台灣衛誌 2006;25:223-30。
趙玫珍:超長期住院患者長期照護需求之探討。公共衛生 1993;20:255-64。
趙美雲、康清雲、莊小瑤:台北縣居家極重度多重殘障者對長期照護之需求研究。公共衛生 1998;25:107-19。
戴玉慈、吳淑瓊、翁瑞亨、戴桂英:急性後期照護需求研究。行政院衛生署89年度委託科技研究發展計畫報告,2000。
戴玉慈、張丹蓉、羅美芳:台灣地區之出院準備服務-試行計畫成果分析。慈濟醫學 1998;10:61-8。
戴桂英、吳淑瓊、江東亮:美國老人醫療保險急性後期照護的發展。台灣衛誌 2006;25:323-9。
簡麗年、吳肖琪:論病例計酬實施前後全股(髖)關節置換術病患出院後30日內的再住院情形。台灣衛誌 2003;22:69-78。
嚴毋過、吳淑瓊、許菁菁、陳寶輝:台北市公私立醫院非急性長期住院病人的盛行率、長期照護需要與長期照護態度。護理研究 1996;4:151-9。
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/27959-
dc.description.abstract腦血管疾病(中風)是台灣第二大死因,也是導致成人身體功能障礙的重要病因,不但需要急性住院治療,更導致出院後續醫療照護的大量需求。因此探討其服務使用和費用為長期照護領域重要的研究課題,而過去研究侷限於少數醫院的立意取樣樣本,或小地區,並非以全人口層面之研究,若能從宏觀角度來進一步釐清影響中老年人出院後續照護的相關因素,對我國全民健康保險和長期照護政策的中介規劃應有重要的參考價值。
本研究目的主要有四:一、了解全民健保中風病人出院後續六個月內醫療照護的使用和費用情況;二、分析中風失能者出院後續醫療服務的利用和費用結構;三、探討影響中風失能者後續照護醫療使用和費用的主要相關因素。四、探討全民健保的支付政策的改變,對出院後續照護服務的可能影響和啟示。
本研究係採用橫斷研究法,以「全國長期照護需要評估」調查中的50歲以上中風住院病人為總樣本;該調查中的失能中風者為失能者樣本,進行描述性分析、雙變項分析、邏輯斯迴歸分析及複迴歸模式分析。本研究的總樣本共計4,700人,其中有4,385人來自社區,315人來自照護機構。本研究的失能者樣本共計1,567人,其中323人採用機構照顧,1244人為社區個案。
研究結果顯示中風失能者出院後六個月內再住院、急診、居家照護、門診、復健服務等各項後續服務的使用率(46.5%、38.0%、12.2%、98.1%、32.3%),皆高於一般中風病人的各項使用率(41.9%、35.1%、6.2%、95.1%、27.0%)。特別是居家照護使用率幾乎加倍,而復健的使用率有兩成的差距。此外,中風失能者各項後續服務的平均總醫療費用為91,924元,一般中風病人則為82,507元,高出11%。
4700位病人的出院後六個月內醫療總費用,以5-6項ADL失能者、有健保重大傷病證明者、有殘障手冊者、出血型中風患者、住機構個案、指標住院有復健者等最高。另外中風失能者樣本中,以減免部分負擔者(有全民健保重大傷病證明者、有殘障手冊者)、有配偶者、居住於院轄市者、合併罹患慢性病三類以上者、完全依賴者、住機構個案,其平均每人後續醫療總費用最高。
本研究發現對後續醫療服務使用,有顯著影響的前傾因素:中風病人以50-64歲為參考組時,75-84歲個案的再住院勝算比為1.26(95﹪CI=1.07-1.49),85歲以上個案的復健勝算比0.52(95﹪CI=0.38-0.71);中風失能者年齡越高復健使用的勝算比為0.98(95﹪CI=0.96-0.99);「中學程度以上者」相較於「未受教育者」復健使用的勝算比為2.08(95﹪CI=1.38-3.15)。
有顯著影響的使能因素:中風病人以「需部分負擔者」為參考組,具「減免部分負擔身分者」的再住院的勝算比為1.82(95﹪CI=1.59-2.08)、急診為1.43(95﹪CI=1.25-1.63)、居家照護為1.89(95﹪CI=1.40-2.56)、復健的勝算比為1.60(95﹪CI=1.37-1.87)。住省轄市者居家照護使用顯著高於住鄉鎮者,勝算比為1.51(95﹪CI=1.08-2.13)。中風失能者中,減免部分負擔者使用復健的勝算比為1.46(95﹪CI=1.10-1.94);住院轄市者使用復健的機率顯著高於居住於鄉鎮者,勝算比為2.30(95﹪CI=1.49-3.54)。
需要方面的顯著影響因素:以功能正常者為參考組,「5-6項ADL困難者」的再住院的勝算比為2.32(95﹪CI=1.97-2.74)、急診的勝算比為1.68(95﹪CI=1.42-1.98)、使用復健的勝算比為1.98(95﹪CI=1.64-2.39)。失能者的巴氏量表分數越高,其再住院勝算比為0.73(95﹪CI=0.65-0.82)、其急診機率的勝算比為0.78(95﹪CI=0.69-0.88)、其居家照護的勝算比為0.22(95﹪CI=0.15-0.32)。失能者樣本以無合併症者為參考組,合併三類以上的慢性病者的再住院勝算比為1.86(95﹪CI=1.33-2.61),使用復健的勝算比為0.61(95﹪CI=0.42-0.91)。
中風病人居住於「機構者」的急診顯著低於「居住於家中者」,勝算比為0.58(95﹪CI=0.44-0.75),但再住院天數、門診、復健服務等的使用都較高。以「居家未聘看護者」為參考組,中風失能者「居住於機構者」的復健使用勝算比為2.49(95﹪CI=1.75-3.54),「居家聘看護者」的復健使用勝算比為1.87(95﹪CI=1.38-2.53);「居家聘看護者」的急診勝算比為1.35(95﹪CI=1.04-1.76),「住機構者」的急診勝算比只為0.58(95﹪CI=0.42-0.81)。中風病人指標住院時於地區醫院者,其再住院使用較高;中風失能者指標住院時於地區醫院者,其門診、急診的使用較高,居家照護使用較低。
從本研究結果顯示台灣中風失能者出院後續全民健保醫療使用或費用,因失能越嚴重、合併症越多、重大傷病患者所需要的費用越高,在訂定健保資源配置的基準時,應納為全民健保後續照護支付政策重要考慮因素。對於機構照護者等的復健利用偏高現象,也應適度探討資源的利用的管理,以提升資源使用效率。城鄉差距現象提醒應留意地理的可近性是否平等。此外,在即將推動醫院前瞻式論病例支付制度時,建議宜(1)同時研議出院後續照護的範圍、支付方式和部分負擔設計,且避免費用過度轉成民眾自付;以及(2)思考如何將急性醫療與出院後續照護加以配套,以求服務連續完整,並設計客觀的成果評估方式。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractStroke is the second leading cause of death in Taiwan; they are also a major cause of disability of adults. Patients not only require acute care, their demands for post-hospital care are also considerable. Along with the aging of society and the increase in medical care costs, an understanding of the use and costs of long-term care is an important issue. Past studies have focused primarily on some non-random samples of hospitals in small areas; they are not targeted at the entire population. A population-based study to clarify some relevant factors that affect the post-hospital care of the elderly should be of important reference to health policies.
The objectives of the present study are four: 1) to understand the use of medical care and their costs of stroke patients under the National Health Insurance(NHI) in the six months after discharge from hospitals; 2) to analyze the use and cost of medical care of disabled stroke patients after discharge; 3) to understand the major factors that affect the use and their costs of post-hospital care of disabled stroke patients ; and 4) to pre-examine the impact of the changes in the payment policies of the National Health Insurance on post-hospital care services.
The study employed the cross-sectional design, using data collected in the first phase survey and the second phase survey of the “Long-Term Care Need Assessment in Taiwan” in 2002. The diagnosis and utilization data is from NHI claim data. The study performed descriptive, bivariate, logistic regression, and multiple regression analyses. A national representative sample of 4,700 stroke patients and another national representative sample of 1567 disabled stroke individuals aged over 50 were studied.
Results of the study show that the use rates of disabled stroke patients of various post-hospital care services such as readmission, emergency care, home nursing care, clinic care, rehabilitation services (46.5%, 38.0%, 12.2%, 98.1%, 32.3% respectively) were higher than those of the general stroke patients (41.9%, 35.1%, 6.2%, 95.1%, 27.0%). The use rate for home nursing care in particular almost doubled. There was a 20% difference in the use rates of rehabilitation services. The average medical costs for post-hospital care for the disabled stroke patients were NT$ 91,924; whereas those of the general stroke patients were NT$ 82,507, an 11% difference.
Of the 4,700 stroke patients, higher total post-hospital care costs were found in those who are with 5-6 items of ADL disabilities, with certificates of severe illnesses under NHI, with hemorrhagic stroke, cared in institutions. Of the disabled stroke sample, higher costs were found in those who are waived of NHI co-payments (patients with certificates of severe illnesses under NHI, with disability certificates), married, patients living in municipalities, suffering from three and more chronic diseases, completely dependent, and cared in institutions.
Logistic regression analyses showed that, enabling factors including the waiving of co-payment, marital status, living in municipalities were significantly associated with post-hospital care utilization. Demand factors such as the number of complications, degree of disability were significantly associated with post-hospital care utilization.
The study also found that there were significant predisposing factors affecting the use of post-hospital care: more outpatient visits for women; longer length of re-hospitalization for men; more rehabilitation visits for disabled stroke women; the use of outpatient clinics and rehabilitation service declines with age; the use of re-hospitalization, emergency care and home nursing care of stroke patients increases with age; more rehabilitation visits and outpatient visits for higher educational level cases.
There are significant need factors: patients with 5-6 items of ADL difficulty, completely dependent (0-20 on the Barthel Index score) had higher use of re-hospitalization, emergency care, home nursing care and rehabilitation; though, the completely dependent patients had fewer outpatient visits. Disabled patients with more chronic diseases had longer re-hospital stay and more outpatient visits, though their use of rehabilitation was less. Patients provided with rehabilitation during their index admission continued to accept outpatient rehabilitation after discharge.
Results of the study suggest that the use and cost of post-hospital care were higher when the patients were more severely disabled, with more complications. In allocating health insurance resources, these factors should be taken into consideration in policies for post-hospital care. The management of resource use should be properly reviewed to improve efficiency. Differences in urban and rural areas suggest that the equality in geographic access should be considered. The NHI benifits, payment and co-payment for post-hospital care should be studied at the same time, and excess out-of-pocket by the public should be avoided. The integration of acute care with post-hospital care should be considered to assure the continuity and comprehensiveness of services.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-12T18:30:12Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-96-D87845002-1.pdf: 851891 bytes, checksum: da0e2af5741634def7abc658c514eb29 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2007
en
dc.description.tableofcontents論文口試委員審定書……………………………………………... i
誌謝……………………………………………………………………ii
中文摘要……………………………………………………………..iii
英文摘要……………………………………………………………..vi
目錄……………………………………………………………...….ix
圖目錄…………………………………………………………..……xi
表目錄…………………………………………………………….….xii
第一章 前言
第一節 研究背景…………………………………………....….1
第二節 研究目的…………………………………………....….5
第三節 論文的內容安排…………………………………....….6
第二章 文獻探討
第一節 出院病人後續照護的概念與發展……………….....…7
第二節 美國老人醫療保險急性後期照護的相關政策和發展…………………………………………………..............…11
第三節 後續照護使用和費用的研究………………….....…..14
第四節 後續醫療照護服務使用之相關影響因素研究………………………………………………..............……20
第五節 健康服務使用影響因素的理論模式………......…….25
第三章 台灣中風出院病人後續醫療使用和費用分析
第一節 前言………………………..…...………..…..………30
第二節 研究架構、研究問題與假說…………………...…....32
第三節 研究材料、研究變項定義與分析方法…….....….….33
第四節 研究結果……………..…………………....………….38
第五節 討論..…………………………………………...…..…54
第四章 中風失能者出院後續醫療照護使用和費用的影響因素分析
第一節 前言……………………………………………...…....62
第二節 研究架構、研究問題與假說…………………….....…64
第三節 研究材料、研究變項定義與分析方法………….......67
第四節 研究結果……………………………………..…....….73
第五節 討論……………………………………………….....…98
第五章 總結與建議
第一節 綜合結論………………………………………....... 109
第二節 政策啟示或建議事項…………………………......…113
第三節 研究限制……………………………………….....….117
參考文獻……………………………………………………..…….119

圖目錄
圖2.1 Andersen 1968年健康服務使用的行為模式………….…25
圖2.2 Andersen的1974年健康服務使用的行為模式………….…26
圖2.3 Andersen的1995年健康服務利用行為模式………….……27
圖2.4 長期照護模式費用的影響因素模型(Schmahl &Rothgang) ……28
圖3.1 中風病人出院後續醫療照護研究架構…………………….32
圖3.2 中風病人後續醫療照護使用率-依年齡…………….……59
圖3.3 中風病人後續醫療照護使用率-依減免部分負擔狀況….59
圖3.4 中風病人後續醫療照護使用率-依城鄉別…………… …60
圖3.5 中風病人後續醫療照護使用率-依失能程度……….……60
圖3.6 中風病人後續醫療照護使用率-依中風類型………….…61
圖3.7 中風病人後續醫療照護使用率-依照護模式………….…61
圖4.1 中風失能者出院後續醫療照護相關因素研究架構……….65
圖4.2 中風失能者指標住院和出院6個月後續醫療費用分布(1)94
圖4.3 中風失能者指標住院和出院6個月後續醫療費用分布(2)95
圖4.4 中風失能者後續醫療照護使用率-依年齡……………...105
圖4.5 中風失能者後續醫療照護使用率-依減免部分負擔狀況..105
圖4.6 中風失能者後續醫療照護使用率-依城鄉別……...…...106
圖4.7 中風失能者後續醫療照護使用率-合併罹患慢性病數…..106
圖4.8 中風失能者後續醫療照護使用率-依失能程度……………107
圖4.9 中風失能者後續醫療照護使用率-依中風類型……………107
圖4.10 中風失能者後續醫療照護使用率-依照護模式………...108
圖4.11 中風失能者後續醫療照護使用率-依醫院層級….………108

表 目 錄
表2.1 美國Medicare急性後期照護前瞻式支付制度…………..133
表2.2 美國Medicare各類急性後期照護費用統計:1992-2004.134
表2.3 美國Medicare急性後期照護資源統計:1990-2005…...135
表2.4 美國Medicare急性後期照護使用情形:1986-2002…...136
表3.1 中風病人特性分佈….……………………….……………137
表3.2 中風病人指標住院平均住院天數和費用………………..138
表3.3 中風病人出院後6個月內再住院狀況….…………………139
表3.4 中風病人出院六個月內再住院之邏輯斯複迴歸分析..…141
表3.5 中風病人出院六個月再住院天數之複迴歸分析………..142
表3.6 中風病人出院後6個月內門診利用狀況….………………143
表3.7 中風病人出院六個月門診次數之複迴歸分析….……..145
表3.8 中風病人出院後6個月內急診狀況………………………146
表3.9 中風病人出院六個月急診使用之邏輯斯複迴歸分析…..148
表3.10 中風病人出院六個月急診就醫次數之複迴歸分析……..149
表3.11 中風病人出院後6個月內居家照護狀況…….…………150
表3.12 中風病人出院六個月居家照護使用之邏輯斯複迴歸分析152
表3.13 中風病人出院六個月居家照護次數之複迴歸分析……..153
表3.14 中風病人出院後6個月內復健狀況…………………….154
表3.15 中風病人出院六個月復健醫療使用之邏輯斯複迴歸分析156
表3.16 中風病人出院六個月再住院費用之複迴歸分析…..……157
表3.17 中風病人出院六個月門診醫療費用之複迴歸分析……..158
表3.18 中風病人出院六個月急診費用之複迴歸分析…………..159
表3.19 中風病人出院六個月居家照護費用之複迴歸分析……..160
表3.20 中風病人出院六個月復健費用之複迴歸分析………..…161
表3.21 中風病人出院後6個月內總醫療利用狀況…….…………162
表3.22 中風病人出院六個月總醫療費用之複迴歸分析………..164
表3.23 中風病人出院後6個月平均使用及費用摘要表.…………165
表3.24 中風病人後續醫療服務使用邏輯斯複迴歸分析顯著性總表166
表3.25 中風病人後續醫療服務頻次複迴歸分析顯著性總表…..167
表3.26 中風病人後續醫療服務費用複迴歸分析顯著性總表..…168
表4.1 中風失能者樣本特性分布…………………………………169
表4.2 中風失能者指標住院狀況人數分布…….……………...170
表4.3 中風失能者指標住院平均每人住院天數和費用…..……171
表4.4 中風失能者出院後再住院率狀況…………………………172
表4.5 中風失能者出院六個月內再住院之邏輯斯迴歸分析.….174
表4.6 中風失能者出院後平均再住院天數….………………...175
表4.7 中風失能者出院六個月再住院天數之複迴歸分析……..177
表4.8 中風失能者出院後門診使用率狀況…….……………...178
表4.9 中風失能者出院後門診次數狀況…………………………180
表4.10 中風失能者出院六個月門診次數之複迴歸分析………..182
表4.11 中風失能者出院後急診使用率狀況………………… …183
表4.12 中風失能者出院六個月急診之邏輯斯複迴歸分析.……185
表4.13 中風失能者出院後急診次數狀況……………………….186
表4.14 中風失能者出院六個月急診次數之複迴歸分析….……188
表4.15 中風失能者出院後居家照護使用率狀況……………….189
表4.16 中風失能者出院六個月居家照護使用之邏輯斯複迴歸分191
表4.17 中風失能者出院後居家照護次數狀況………………….192
表4.18 中風失能者出院六個月居家照護次數之複迴歸分析…194
表4.19 中風失能者出院後復健使用率狀況…………………….195
表4.20 中風失能者出院六個月復健使用之邏輯斯複迴歸分析.197
表4.21 中風失能者出院後門診復健次數狀況…………………198
表4.22 中風失能者出院六個月門診復健次數之複迴歸分析…200
表4.23 中風失能者出院後平均每人再住院醫療費用…………201
表4.24 中風失能者出院六個月內再住院醫療費用之複迴歸分析203
表4.25 中風失能者出院後平均每人門診費用狀況……………204
表4.26 中風失能者出院六個月門診費用之複迴歸分析………206
表4.27 中風失能者出院後平均每人急診費用狀況……………207
表4.28 中風失能者出院六個月急診費用之複迴歸分析………209
表4.29 中風失能者出院後平均每人居家照護費用狀況………210
表4.30 中風失能者出院六個月居家照護費用之複迴歸分析…212
表4.31 中風失能者出院後平均每人復健費用狀況……………213
表4.32 中風失能者出院六個月復健醫療費用之複迴歸分析…215
表4.33 中風失能者出院後平均每人總醫療費用狀況…………216
表4.34 中風失能者出院六個月總醫療費用之複迴歸分析……218
表4.35 中風失能者出院後6個月平均使用及費用摘要表………219
表4.36 中風失能者後續醫療服務使用邏輯斯複迴歸分析顯著性總表..220
表4.37 中風失能者後續醫療服務頻次複迴歸分析顯著性總表.221
表4.38 中風失能者後續醫療服務費用複迴歸分析顯著性總表.222
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.title中風出院病人後續醫療照護之研究zh_TW
dc.titleStudy on the Post-hospital Care of Stroke Patientsen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear95-2
dc.description.degree博士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee江東亮(Tung-Liang Chiang),張宏哲(Hong-Jer Chang),鄭守夏(Shou-Hsia Cheng),賴美淑(Mei-Shu Lai),戴玉慈(Yu-Tzu Dai)
dc.subject.keyword後續醫療照護,急性後期照護,中風,失能者,全民健康保險,疾病診斷關聯群,影響因素,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordpost-hospital care,postacute care,stroke,disabled,National Health Insurance(NHI),diagnosis related groups(DRGs),factors,en
dc.relation.page222
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2007-08-02
dc.contributor.author-college公共衛生學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept衛生政策與管理研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:健康政策與管理研究所

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-96-1.pdf
  目前未授權公開取用
831.92 kBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved