請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/27811
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 張顯達(Hintat Cheung) | |
dc.contributor.author | Hsiang-nan Chou | en |
dc.contributor.author | 周向南 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-12T18:21:53Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2007-08-28 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2007-08-28 | |
dc.date.issued | 2007 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2007-08-21 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Allen, S. E. M. (2000). A discourse-pragmatic explanation for argument representation in child Inuktitut. Linguistics, 38(3(367)), 483-521.
Ariel, M. (1988). Referring and accessibility. Journal of Linguistics, 24(1), 65-87. Ariel, M. (1991). The function of accessibility in a theory of grammar. Journal of Pragmatics, 16(5), 443-463. Arnold, J. E. (2001). The effect of thematic roles on pronoun use and frequency of reference continuation. Discourse Processes, 31(2), 137-162. Bamberg, M. (1986). A functional approach to the acquisition of anaphoric relationships. Linguistics, 24(1(281)), 227-284. Blackwell, S. E. (2000). Anaphora interpretations in Spanish utterances and the neo-Gricean pragmatic theory. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(4), 389-424. Blackwell, S. E. (2001). Testing the neo-Gricean pragmatic theory of anaphora: The influence of consistency constraints on interpretations of coreference in Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics, 33(6), 901-941. Chafe, W. L. (1980). The pear stories: Cognitive, cultural and linguistic aspects of narrative production. Norwood NJ: Albex. Chien, Y.-C., & Wexler, K. (1987). Children's acquisition of the locality condition for reflexives and pronouns. Papers and Reports on Child Language Development, 26(Aug), 30-39. Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding.: Dordrecht: Foris. Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of language. New York: Praeger. Clancy, P. (1993). Preferred argument structure in Korean acquisition. In E. V. Clark (Ed.), The Proceedings of the Twenty-fifth Child Language Research Forum (pp. 307-314). Clark, E. V. (2003). First language acquisition. Cambridge University Press. Crawley, R. A., & Stevenson, R. J. (1990). Reference in single sentences and in texts. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 19(3), 191-210. Crawley, R. A., Stevenson, R. J., & Kleinman, D. (1990). The use of heuristic strategies in the interpretation of pronouns. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 19(4), 245-264. Du Bois, J. W. (1987). The discourse basis of ergativity. Language, 63, 805-855. Garnham, A., Traxler, M., Oakhill, J., & Gernsbacher, M. A. (1996). The locus of implict causality effects in comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 35(4), 517-543. Gernsbacher, M. A., & Hargreaves, D. J. (1988). Accessing sentence participants: The advantage of first mention. Journal of Memory and Language, 27(6), 699-717. Gernsbacher, M. A., Hargreaves, D. J., & Beeman, M. (1989). Building and accessing clausal representations: The advantage of first mention versus the advantage of clause recency. Journal of Memory and Language, 28(6), 735-755. Gruter, T. (2005). Comprehension and production of French object clitics by child second language learners and children with specific language impairment. Applied Psycholinguistics, 26(3), 363-391. Guerriero, A. M. S., Oshima-Takane, Y., & Kuriyama, Y. (2006). The development of referential choice in English and Japanese: a discourse-pragmatic perspective. Journal of Child Language, 33(4), 823-858. Huang, Y. (1991). A neo-Gricean pragmatic theory of anaphora. Journal of Linguistics, 27(2), 301-335. Huang, Y. (1994). The syntax and pragmatics of anaphora: A study with special reference to Chinese. Cambridge, England: Cambridge U Press. Jarvikivi, J., van Gompel, R. P. G., Hyona, J., & Bertram, R. (2005). Ambiguous pronoun resolution: Contrasting the first-Mention and subject-preference accounts. Psychological Science, 16(4), 260-264. Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1981). The grammatical marking of thematic structure in the development of language production. In W. Deutsch (Ed.), The Child's Construction of Language. London: Academic Press. Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1983). Language development as a problem-solving process. Papers and reports on child language development, 22(July), 1-22. Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1985). Language and cognitive processes from a developmental perspective. Language and cognitive processes, 1(1), 61-85. Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1986). Some Fundamental Aspects of Language Development after Age 5. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Lai, R. S.-R. (1998). Anaphora in Chinese-speaking children's spoken narraives. National Taiwan Normal University. Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics: Cambridge University Press. Levinson, S. C. (1987a). Minimization and conversational inference. . Amsterdam: Benjamins. Levinson, S. C. (1987b). Pragmatics and the grammar of anaphora: A partial pragmatic reduction of binding and control phenomena. Journal of Linguistics, 23(2), 379-434. Li, N. C., & Thompson, S. A. (1981). Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. : Berkley: University of California Press. Manzini, M. R., & Wexler, K. (1987). Parameters, binding theory, and learnability. Linguistic Inquiry, 18(3), 413-444. Mayer, M. (1969). Frog, where are you? New York: The Dial Press. McDonald, J. L., & MacWhinney, B. (1995). The time course of anaphor resolution: Effects of implicit verb causality and gender. Journal of Memory and Language, 34(4), 543-566. McQueen, J., M. (2005). Spoken-word recognition and production: Regular but not inseperable Bedfellows. In A. Cutler (Ed.), Twenty-First Century Psycholinguistics: Four Cornerstones (pp. 229-244). Mahwah, New Jersey, London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers. Narasimhan, B., Budwig, N., & Murty, L. (2005). Argument realization in Hindi caregiver-child discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 37(4), 461-495. Orsolini, M. R., Franca; Pontecorvo, Clotilde. (1996). Re-introduction of referents in Italian children's narratives. Journal of Child Language, 2(23), 465-486. Serratrice, L. (2005). The role of discourse pragmatics in the acquisition of subjects in Italian. Applied Psycholinguistics, 26(3), 437-462. Solan, L. (1983). Pronominal reference: Child language and the theory of grammar. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel Publishing Co. Song, H.-j., & Fisher, C. (2002). Young children's sensitivity to discourse cues in on-line pronoun interpretation. Proceedings of the Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, 26(2), 653-664. Song, H.-j., & Fisher, C. (2005). Who's 'she'? Discourse prominence influences preschoolers' comprehension of pronouns. Journal of Memory and Language, 52(1), 29-57. Stevenson, R. J., Crawley, R. A., & Kleinman, D. (1994). Thematic roles, focus and the representation of events. Language and cognitive processes, 9(4), 519-548. Wigglesworth, G. (1990). Children's narrative acquisition: A study of some aspects of reference and anaphora. First Language, 10(29), 105-125. Wigglesworth, G. (1997). Children's individual approaches to the organization of narrative. Journal of Child Language, 24(2), 279-309. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/27811 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本研究探究代名詞理解與使用之間的關連性。 在此研究中四歲與六歲之幼兒參與一項裏解測驗與一項產出測驗。 理解測驗檢視幼兒面對兩個可能先行詞時對代名詞指涉的理解。 根據理解測驗內容相同的故事而取得的記敘文則用來評估代名詞的產出與理解之間是否有相關聯。 根據理解測驗的表現共歸納出四種理解策略: (1) 以主詞為根據 (2) 以特定角色為根據 (3) 以語意關係為根據 (4) 綜合型策酪。 分析發現四歲組與六歲組在理解策略的偏好上有所不同。 六歲組比四歲組有較多的受試者使用以語意為根據及綜合型的理解策略。 對照產出的表現發現使用不同理解策略的受試者在維持指涉對象時所用的指涉詞也不同。 對六歲組而言,使用以主詞為根據,以語意關係為根據以及綜合型理解策略的受試者比使用以特定角色為根據之理解測驗的受試者使用更多明確的指涉詞. 統計分析也指出對六歲組的受試者而言,理解策略和明確指涉詞的使用有相關性。 然而四歲組則沒有發現理解測驗和代名詞使用的相關性。 根據Clark (2003)的理論,當兒童成長時會根據外在的語言輸入而改進自己的理解策略。 而改良的理解能力也可以進一步指引語言的產出. 資料顯示四歲組缺乏代名詞理解與使用的相關性可以歸因於接收外界語料的不足或基本認知能力發展不夠成熟。 六歲組資料所顯示出理解與使用的相關性則指出當兒童成長時他們對代名詞指涉理解的進步也會帶動他們更注意代名詞指涉功能的使用。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | The present study explores the connection between pronoun comprehension and production. A comprehension task and a production task were conducted to test children of ages 4 and 6. The comprehension task examined children’s comprehension strategies for pronoun references in stories in which there are two competing animate referents. Narratives based on the comprehension stories were assessed in the production task to see if there is consistency between comprehension and production. Four comprehension strategies were identified based on the result of the comprehension task: (1) subject-based strategy, (2) character-based strategy, (3) semantics-based strategy and (4) mixed strategy. It was also observed that character-based comprehension strategy would lead to false comprehension in the present setting because the study involved two animate characters. A shift of comprehension was observed between age 4 and age 6. More children of age 6 adopted semantics-based and mixed comprehension strategy while fewer adopted character-based comprehension strategy. Further examination of narrative produced by children of different comprehension strategies was carried out by analyzing the types of referential expressions used under different contexts (reference introduction, reference maintenance, and reference switching). It was observed that while the use of referential expressions in contexts of reference introduction and reference switching are similar within both age groups, difference of patterns was observed under the context of reference maintenance. Although the rate of using explicit expressions was similar among comprehension strategies at age 4, difference was observed among different strategies for age 6. Six-year-olds with subject, semantic, and mixed strategy use more explicit expressions and combination of explicit expressions than 6-year-olds with character-based comprehension strategies. Subsequent statistical analysis showed that there was a correlation between comprehension strategies and use of explicit referential expressions for children of age 6. On the other hand, no correlation between comprehension strategies and the use of explicit referential expressions was found among children of age 4. The data indicated that as children get older they are more sensitive to the proper discourse cues that would lead to appropriate comprehension of referential relations. As they are more sensitive to these referential relations they pay more attention to the referential expressions used in their narratives and use more explicit expressions to avoid ambiguity in production. The lack of correlation between comprehension strategies and referential use for group of age 4 can be attributed to the lack of language input to shape their language comprehension and production. This finding can be viewed as in line with Clark’s (2003) relationship between C(comprehension) – representation and P(production) – representation. When children grow older, they receive more language input to moderate their comprehension and can further use the way they comprehend referential expressions to monitor their production of referential expressions. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-12T18:21:53Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-96-R92142009-1.pdf: 499136 bytes, checksum: 5a06f84614853ebd4ee995b92f33017d (MD5) Previous issue date: 2007 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | Table of Contents I
口試委員會審定書 i Acknowledgement ii Chinese Abstract iii English Abstract iv List of Abbreviations vi List of Tables vii Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.0 Background 1 1.1 Objective of the Study 3 1.2 Organization of the Study 3 Chapter 2 Literature Review 5 2.0 Introduction 5 2.1 Children’s Use of Referential Expressions 5 2.2 Previous Studies on Referential Use in Narratives 9 2.3 A Pragmatic Account for Pronoun Comprehension 12 2.4 Other Studies on the Comprehension of Referential Expressions 14 2.5 Previous Studies on Children’s Referential Comprehension and Production 16 2.6 Summary 17 Chapter 3 Comprehension of Referential Expressions 18 3.0 Introduction 18 3.1 Participants: 19 3.2 Material 19 3.3 Procedure of Comprehension Task 22 3.4 Scoring of the Comprehension Data 22 3.5 Results 23 3.5.1 General Performance of the Comprehension Task 23 3.5.2 Comprehension Strategies 27 3.6 Summary of the Comprehension Task 30 Chapter 4 Production of Referential Expressions 31 4.0 Introduction 31 4.1 Material and Procedure 31 4.2 Coding 32 4.2.1 Types of Referential Expressions: 33 4.2.1.1 Zero Anaphora 33 4.2.1.2 Pronouns 34 4.2.1.3 NPs 35 4.2.1.4 NP + NP 36 4.2.1.5 NP + pronoun 36 4.2.1.6 NP + zero anaphora 37 4.2.1.7 pronoun + pronoun 38 4.2.1.8 pronoun + zero anaphora 39 4.2.1.9 third person plural - tamen 40 4.2.2 Level of Ambiguity of Referential Expressions: 41 4.3 The Use of Referential Expressions in Production 43 4.3.1 The Distribution of Referential Expressions 43 4.3.2 Ambiguity of Referential Expressions 47 4.4 Summary of the Production Data 49 Chapter 5 Between Comprehension and Production 51 5.0 Introduction 51 5.1 Correspondence between Comprehension and Production 51 5.2 Summary 61 Chapter 6 Conclusion 63 REFERENCES 66 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 中文兒童對代名詞指涉的理解與運用 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Comprehension and Production of Pronoun referencing: A Developmental Study of Mandarin-Speaking Children | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 95-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 程玉秀(Yuh-show Cheng),黃瓊之(Chiung-chih Huang) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 語言習得,代名詞指涉,代名詞理解,代名詞使用,理解與使用, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Language Acquisition,Referential Expressions,Referential Comprehension,Referential Production,Comprehension and Production, | en |
dc.relation.page | 73 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2007-08-21 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 文學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 語言學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 語言學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-96-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 487.44 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。