Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 生物資源暨農學院
  3. 生物環境系統工程學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/27508
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor譚義績(Yih-Chi Tan)
dc.contributor.authorPo-Wen Changen
dc.contributor.author張博文zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-12T18:07:41Z-
dc.date.available2008-01-02
dc.date.copyright2008-01-02
dc.date.issued2007
dc.date.submitted2007-12-23
dc.identifier.citation王銀波、廖乾華,國外農作物中重金屬之限量標準。農作物中重金屬監測基準資料之建立,p.61-72,台灣省農業藥物毒物試驗所,(1999)。
行政院環保署,土壤中水分及砷、鉻、銅、汞、鎘、鎳、鉛、鋅暫行檢測方法- 0.1 M鹽酸萃取- NIEA S320.60T,1991。
行政院環保署網站,www.epa.gov.tw,(2002)。
呂昱志,重金屬污染農地之整治方案研擬-應用能值分析評估鎘污染農地整治方案,國立中興大學資源管理研究所碩士論文,1996。
林浩潭、李國欽、賴國仙,台灣地區不同作物對土壤重金屬吸收之探討。第三屆土壤污染防治研討會論文集,(1992)。
章裕民,環境工程化學,文京圖書有限公司,(1998)。
陳呈芳,土壤重金屬污染整治技術,工業污染防治季刊(43),(2004)。
張仁福,土壤污染防治學。高雄復文圖書出版社,p.325-340,(1998)。
張尊國,「台灣地區土壤污染現況與整治政策分析」,國政分析,永續(析)091-021號,(2002)。
Abramovitch RA, Lu C, Hicks E, Sinard J (2003) In situ remediation of soils contaminated with toxic metal ions using microwave energy. Chemosphere 53 (9): 1077-1085.
Acar YB, Alshawabkeh AN (1993) Principles of electrokinetic remediation. Environmental Science& Technology 27 (13): 2638-2647.
Acar YB, Gale RJ, Alshawabkeh AN, Marks RE, Puppala S, Bricka M, Parker R (1995) Electrokinetic remediation:basics and technology status. Journal of Hazardous Material 40:117-137.
Alloway BJ (1995) Heavy metals in soils, 2nd Edition, Chapman and Hall, London.
Alshawabkeh AN, Bricka RM, Gent DB (2005) Pilot-scale electrokinetic cleanup of lead-contaminated soils. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 131 (3): 283-291.
Alshawabkeh AN, Yeung AT, Bricka MR (1999) Practical aspects of in-situ electrokinetic extraction. Journal of Environmental Engineering 125:27-35.
Alshawabkeh AN, Yeung AT, Bricka MR (1999) Practical aspects of in-situ electrokinetic extraction. Journal of Environmental Engineering-ASCE 125 (1): 27-35.
Altin A, Degirmenci M (2005) Lead (II) removal from natural soils by enhanced electrokinetic remediation. Science of The Total Environment 337 (1-3): 1-10.
Amrate S, Akretche DE, Innocent C, Seta P (2005) Removal of Pb from a calcareous soil during EDTA-enhanced electrokinetic extraction. Science of The Total Environment 349 (1-3): 56-66.
Bremner JM, Mulvaney CS (1982) Nitrogen-total. In A. L. Page et al(eds). Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. 2nd. ed. Agronomy:595- 624.
Chen XJ, Shen ZM, Lei YM, Zheng SS, Ju BX, Wang WH (2006) Enhanced electrokinetic remediation of Cd and Pb spiked soil coupled with cation exchange membrane. Australian Journal of Soil Reserch 44 (5): 523-529.
Chen XJ, Shen ZM, Yuan T, Zheng SS, Ju BX and Wang WH (2006) Enhancing electrokinetic remediation of cadmium-contaminated soils with stepwise moving anode method. Journal of Environmental Science and Health PartA- Toxic/Hazardous Substances & Environmental Engineering 41 (11): 2517-2530.
Davies, B.E., Lead. In B.J.Alloway(ed.) Heavy metals in soils. p.206-220 John Wiley&Sons,New York,1995.
Gee GW, Bauder JW (1986) Particles size analysis. In A. Klute (ed).Method of soil analysis:Part 1. 2nd ed. Agronomy 9 : 283-409.
Gent DB, Bricka RM, Alshawabkeh AN, Larson SL, Fabian G, Granade S (2004) Bench- and field-scale evaluation of chromium and cadmium extraction by electrokinetics. Journal of Hazardous Materials 110 (1-3): 53-62.
Giannis A, Gidarakos E (2005) Washing enhanced electrokinetic remediation for removal cadmium from real contaminated soil. Journal of Hazardous Materials 123 (1-3): 165-175.
Jensen PE, Ottosen LM, Harmon TC (2007) The effect of soil type on the electrodialytic remediation of lead-contaminated soil. Environmental Engineering Science 24 (2): 234-244.
Jurate V, Mike S, Petri L (2002) Electrokinetic soil remediation-critical overview. The science of Total Environmental 289:97-121.
Kim SO, Moon SH, Kim KW, Yun ST (2002) Pilot scale study on the ex situ electrokinetic removal of heavy metals from municipal wastewater sludges. Water Research 36 (19): 4765-4774.
Lee HS, Lee K, Kim SS, Ko SH (2003) Effects of soil buffering capacity and citric acid in electrolyte on electrokinetic remediation of mine tailing soils. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry 9 (4): 360-365.
Lindgren ER, Mattson ED, Kozak MW (1994) Electrokinetic remediation of unsaturated soils. ACS Symp. Ser 554:33-50.
Liu YG, Li CF, Zeng GM, Yue X, Li X, Xu WH, Tang CF, Yuan XZ (2005) Removal of cadmium from cadmium-contaminated red soils using electrokinetic soil processing. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China 15 (6): 1394-1400.
Manokararajah K, Ranjan RS (2005) Electrokinetic retention, migration and remediation of nitrates in silty loam soil under hydraulic gradients. Engineering Geology 77 (3-4): 263-272.
Mary M, Chistopher L (2002) Electroremediation of Contaminated Soils. Journal of Environmental engineering 128:208-219.
Matsumoto N, Uemoto H, Saiki H (2007) Case study of electrochemical metal removal from actual sediment, sludge, sewage and scallop organs and subsequent pH adjustment of sediment for agricultural use. Water Reserch 41 (12): 2541-2550.
Mattson ED, Bowman RS, Lindgren ER (2000) Electrokinetic remediation using surfactant-coated ceramic casings. Journal of Environmental Engineering-ASCE 126 (6): 534-540.
McGrath, S.P.and Smith, S. ,Chromium and nickel. In B.J.Alloway(ed.) Heavy metals in soils. p.152-179.John Wiley&Sons,New York,1995.
McLean EO (1982) Soil pH and lime requirment. In A.L. Page et al.(ed). Method of soil analysis (2nd ed) , Part 2:Chemical and microbilolgical properties. Agronomy monograph No. 9.ASA and SSSA : 199-224.
Nelson DW, Sommers LE (1982) Total carbon ,organic carbon,and organic matter. In A.L. Page et al.(ed).Method of soil analysis (2nd ed),Part 2: Chemical and microbiological properties.Agronomy monograph No. 9.ASA and SSSA: 539-580.
Olsen SR, Sommers LE (1982) Phosphorus. p.403-430. In A. L. Page, R. H. Miller, and D. R. Keeney. (ed.) Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Academic Press, Inc. New York..
Page MM, Page CL (2002) Electroremediation of contaminated soils. Journal of Environmental Engineering-ASCE 128 (3): 208-219.
Peters RW (1999) Chelant extraction of heavy metals from contaminated soils. Journal of Hazardous Material 66:151-210.
Reddy KR, Chinthamreddy S (2004) Enhanced electrokinetic remediation of heavy metals in glacial till soils using different electrolyte solutions. Journal of Environmental Engineering-ASCE 130 (4): 442-455.
Rhoades JD (1982) Cation exchange capacity. In A.L. Page et al.(ed). Method of soil analysis (2nd ed), Part 2: Chemical and microbilolgical properties. Agronomy monograph No. 9.ASA and SSSA : 149-157.
Sah JG, Chen JY (1998) Study of the electrokinetic process on Cd and Pb spiked soils. Journal of Hazard. Material 58:301-315.
Sanjay K, Arora A, Shekhar R, Das RP (2003) Electroremediation of Cr(VI) contaminated soils: kinetics and energy efficiency. Collids and Surfaces A-Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 222 (1-3): 253-259.
Shiba S, Hino S, Hirata Y, Seno T (2000) Removal of heavy metal from soil and groundwater by in-situ electrokinetic remediation. Water and Technology 42 (7-8): 335-343.
Thomas, G.W. 1982. Exchangeable cations. In A. L. Page et al. (ed.). Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. 2nd ed. Madison, WI., Agronomy 9: 159-166.
Vengris T, Binkiene R, Sveikauskaite A (2001) Electrokinetic remediation of lead-, zinc- and cadmium-contaminated soil.Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology 76 (11): 1165-1170.
Viadero RC, Reed BE, Berg M, Ramsey J (1998) A laboratory-scale study of applied voltage on the electrokinetic separation of lead from soils. Separation Science and Technology 33 (12): 1833-1859.
Virkutyte J, Sillanpaa M, Latostenmaa P (2002) Electrokinetic soil remediation - critical overview. Science of The Total Environment 289 (1-3): 97-121.
Wang JH, Huang XJ, Kao JCM, Stabnikova O (2007) Simultaneous removal of orangic contaminants and heavy meatals from kaolin using upward electrokinetic soil remediation process. Journal of Hazard Material 144(1-2): 292-299.
Wang JY, Zhang DS, Stabnikova O, Tay JH (2005) Evaluation of electrokinetic removal of heavy metals from sewage sludge. Journal of Hazardous Materials 124 (1-3): 139-146.
Wieczorek S, Weigand H, Schmid M, Narb C (2005) Electrokinetic remediation of an electroplating site: design and scale-up for an in-situ application in the unsaturated zone. Engineering Geology 77 (3-4): 203-215.
Yuan C, Weng CH (2006) Electrokinetic enhancement removal of heavy metals from industrial wastewater sludge. Chemophere 65 (1): 88-96.
Yuan SH, Xi ZM, Jiang Y, Wan JZ, Wu C,Zheng ZH and Lu XH (2007) Desorption of copper and cadmium from soils enhanced by organic acids. Chemophere 68 (7): 1289-1297.
Zagury GJ, Dartiguenave Y, Setier JC (1999) Ex situ electroreclamation of heavy metals contaminated sludge: Pilot scale study.Journal of Environmental Engineering-ASCE 125 (10): 972-978.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/27508-
dc.description.abstract全世界每一年產生上百萬噸的有害廢棄物,而在過去由於不當廢棄物處理及其滲漏造成相當多的地區遭受重金屬、有機化合物及其他有害物質污染,並嚴重影響地下水、土壤及相關的生態。雖然,過去十幾年間已有實驗室試驗研究出多種有效解決這些問題的方法,但對於現地處理方法及相關資料仍相當缺乏。因此,本模場試驗乃以現地處理方式期能建立相關的現地資料,以提供未來大面積施行之參考。
電動力復育技術為一極具潛力土壤復育技術,尤其是對於低滲透性的土壤。本現場模場試驗主要為應用電動力復育技術現地移除坋質壤土農地之鎘、鉛及鉻污染物,並探討復育過程中鎘、鉛及鉻污染物之移除效率與土壤肥力之提昇效果。本試驗以檸檬酸及界面活性劑為處理液,藉由施加直流電,配合土壤化性的改善證實能同時改善坋質壤土農地之鎘、鉛及鉻污染及提昇自身土壤肥力。
本試驗於重金屬污染農地設置長3公尺,寬3公尺,高約0.5公尺的A、B二個處理槽,於A槽中以檸檬酸及界面活性劑為處理液,另B槽除以檸檬酸及界面活性劑為處理液另多添加食品級脫附劑於處理液中,經過92天的處理,結果指出B槽最終鎘、鉛及鉻之平均去除效率分別為76.59%、62.25%及50.40%;而A槽最終鎘、鉛及鉻之平均去除效率分別69.74%、58.02%及58.68%,顯見電動力復育技術對於重金屬去除有其良好的成效,另對於土壤中的有機質、全氮、Bray-1磷、交換性鉀及交換性鎂亦皆有相對程度之提昇,且在適當的操作環境下,電動力復育技術未來可作為全面土壤污染現地復育時整治工作之參考。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThere are millions of tons of hazardous wastes generated every year in the world. Due to improper waste handling techniques causing hazardous waste release in the past, thousands of sites were contaminated by heavy metals, organics and other hazardous materials, which posed an enormous impact on quality of groundwater, soil, and the associated ecosystems. During past decades, several new, innovative solutions for efficient removal of contaminants from soil have been studied to help correct environmental pollution. Despite numerous promising laboratory experiments conducted, there are still not many techniques successfully implemented on in situ soil treatment. Therefore, results from this in situ pilot-scale testing can be used to establish useful data for field-scale implementation in the future.
Electrokinetic treatment process is of a useful remedial technology, particularly on the soil with low permeability. The purposes of this pilot test is to implements electrokinetic technology to remove heavy metals Cd, Pb, and Cr from the silty loam in the rice field, to evaluate the removal efficiency of Cd, Pb, and Cr, and to promote soil fertility enhancement during treatment process. The test used citric acid-surfactant mixtures as treatment solution under an implied electrical field to enhance the removal of Cd, Pb, and Cr and fertility of the silty farm soil simultaneously.
The test soil of this pilot test was stockpiled into two cells, Cell A and Cell B, and both with dimensions of 3 m long, 3 m wide, and 0.5 m high. This test used citric acid as the main reactive agent and a biodegradable liquid surfactant as the metal chelating agent in both Cell A and Cell B. Additional food grade surfactant was added in Cell B. The test was conducted over a period of 92 days. The test results revealed that electrokinectic process in Cell A gained an average removal efficiency of 76.59%, 62.25% and 50.40% for Cd, Pb and Cr, respectively. Electrokinectic process in Cell B gained an average removal efficiency of 69.74%, 58.02% and 58.68% for Cd, Pb and Cr, respectively. According to the test results, Eelectrokinetic process is proven as a successful technology to remove heavy metals from contaminated soil. In addition, the content of total nitrogen, Bray-1 phosphorus, and exchangeable potassium and magnesium, were relatively elevated after 92 days of treatment duration. It concludes that electrokinectic treatment technology is capable of mitigating soil contaminated with not only heavy metals but also organic compounds, and thus is a potential in situ treatment technology in the future.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-12T18:07:41Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-96-D89622006-1.pdf: 770031 bytes, checksum: 11c6884a791354e5c45da4b28fb8957f (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2007
en
dc.description.tableofcontents口試委員會審定書 i
謝誌 ii
中文摘要 iii
英文摘要 iv
目錄 vi
圖目錄 viii
表目錄 ix
第一章 前言 1
1.1 緒論 1
1.2 目的 6
第二章 文獻回顧 7
2.1 重金屬來源及其危害 7
2.1.1 重金屬來源 8
2.1.2 重金屬在土壤中之含量 11
2.1.3 重金屬蔡土壤中的遷移 12
2.1.4 重金屬對人體之危害 14
2.1.5 重金屬對植物之危害 17
2.2 台灣地區土壤污染調查 19
2.3 重金屬污染整治技術 26
2.4 電動力復育技術 30
2.4.1 電動力復育技術原理及應用 32
2.4.2 螯合劑 35
2.4.3 電動力法處理適用性及操作條件 38
2.5 國內土壤研究與整治情形 40
2.6 國外電動力整治重金屬土壤之研究 45
第三章 材料與方法 47
3.1 研究架構試驗材料 47
3.2 試驗材料 49
3.2.1 試驗場址 49
3.2.2 土壤理化性質測定 51
3.3 試驗方法 54
3.3.1 處理槽設置 54
3.3.2 試驗操作條件 56
3.2.3 採樣方法與頻率 57
第四章 結果與討論 58
4.1 土壤基本性質 58
4.2 土壤土壤pH 60
4.3 電流及電壓 62
4.4 重金屬濃度 64
4.4.1 鎘濃度 64
4.4.2 鉛濃度 67
4.4.3 鉻濃度 69
4.5 重金屬去除效率 71
4.5.1 鎘移除效率 71
4.5.2 鉛移除效率 74
4.5.3 鉻移除效率 76
4.6 土壤肥力 78
4.7 滲漏液處理 83
4.8 成本分析 86
第五章 結論與建議 87
5.1 結論 87
5.2 建議 88
參考文獻 89
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.subject土壤肥力zh_TW
dc.subject模場試驗zh_TW
dc.subject電動力zh_TW
dc.subject重金屬zh_TW
dc.subject復育zh_TW
dc.subjectHeavy metalsen
dc.subjectSoil fertilityen
dc.subjectTreatmenten
dc.subjectPilot testen
dc.subjectElectrokineticen
dc.title重金屬污染農地整治暨土壤肥力提升zh_TW
dc.titleRemediation of Heavy Metals Contaminated Farmland and Fertility Enhancementen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear96-1
dc.description.degree博士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee方鴻源(Hung-Yuan Fang),謝永旭(Yung-Hsu Hsieh),李振誥(Cheng-Haw Lee),陳主惠(Chu-Hui Chen)
dc.subject.keyword模場試驗,電動力,重金屬,復育,土壤肥力,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordPilot test,Electrokinetic,Heavy metals,Treatment,Soil fertility,en
dc.relation.page93
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2007-12-24
dc.contributor.author-college生物資源暨農學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept生物環境系統工程學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:生物環境系統工程學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-96-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
751.98 kBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved