請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/27323
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 陳章波 | |
dc.contributor.author | Sian-Hao Ling | en |
dc.contributor.author | 林顯豪 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-12T18:01:15Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2010-01-30 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2008-01-30 | |
dc.date.issued | 2008 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2008-01-25 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 謝蕙蓮 (2007)。溼地之承載力與承載量探討:以高美野生動物保護區為例(II)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫。
Andres-Abellan M, Alamo J, Landete-Castillejos T, Lopez-Serrano FR, Garcia-Morote FA, Cerro-Barja A (2005). Impacts of visitors on soil and vegetation of the recreational area' Nacimiento del Rio Mundo' (Castilla-La Mancha, Spain). Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 101, 55-67. Atwell BJ (1993). Response of roots to mechanical impedance. Environmental and experimental botany. 33, 27-40. Bale AJ, Kenny AJ (2005). Sediment analysis and seabed characterisation. In Methods for the Study of Marine Benthos. (AD McIntyre, A Eleftheriou, eds): Blackwell Publishing. Ball BC, Campbell DJ, Douglas JT, Henshall JK, O'Sullivan MF (1997). Soil structural quality, compaction and land management. European Journal of Soil Science. 48, 593-601. Batey T, McKenzie DC (2006). Soil compaction: identification directly in the field. Soil Use and Management. 22, 123-131. Bengough AG, Campbell DJ, O’Sullivan MF (2001). Penetrometer techniques in relation to soil compaction and root growth. In Soil and Environmental Analysis. Physical Methods. 2nd Edition. Eds. KA Smith, CE Mullinsed, pp. 377-403. Bengough AG, Mullins CE (1990). Mechanical impedance to root growth: a review of experimental techniques and root growth responses. European Journal of Soil Science. 41, 341-358. Bengough AG, Young I (1993). Root elongation of seedling peas through layered soil of different penetration resistances. Plant and Soil. 149, 129-139. Beutler AN, Centurion JF, Silva APd (2005). Soil resistance to penetration and least limiting water range for soybean yield in a haplustox from Brazil. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology. 48, 863-871. Boone FR, Veen BW (1994). Mechanisms of crop response to soil compaction. In Soil Compaction in Crop Production. Development in Agricultural Engineering 11. (B Soane, C Van Ouwerkerk, eds). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier, pp. 237-264. Brenchley GA (1982). Mechanisms of spatial competition in marine soft-bottom communities. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology. 60, 17-33. Brotas V, Amorim-Ferreira A, Vale C, Catarino F (1990). Oxygen profiles in intertidal sediments of Ria Formosa (S. Portugal). Hydrobiologia. 207, 123-130. Brown AC, Trueman ER (1991). Burrowing of sandy-beach molluscs in relation to penetrability of the substratum. Journal of Molluscan Studies. 57, 134-136. Busscher WJ, Bauer PJ, Camp CR, Sojka RE (1997). Correction of cone index for soil water content differences in a coastal plain soil. Soil and Tillage Research. 43, 205-217. Busscher WJ, Frederick JR, Bauer PJ (2000). Timing effects of deep tillage on penetration resistance and wheat and soybean yield. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 64, 999-1003. Chandrasekara WU, Frid CLJ (1996). Effects of human trampling on tidalflat infauna. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems. 6, 299-311. Chapman G (1949). The thixotropy and dilatancy of a marine soil. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. 28, 123-140. Cook A, Marriott CA, Seel W, Mullins CE (1996). Effects of soil mechanical impedance on root and shoot growth of Lolium perenne L., Agrostis capillaris and Trifolium repens L. Journal of Experimental Botany. 47, 1075-1084. Craig PC (1973). Behaviour and distribution of the sand-beach amphipod Orchestoidea corniculata. Marine Biology. 23, 101-109. Dernie KM, Kaiser MJ, Warwick RM (2003). Recovery rates of benthic communities following physical disturbance. The Journal of Animal Ecology. 72, 1043-1056. Dugan JE, Hubbard DM, Lastra M (2000). Burrowing abilities and swash behavior of three crabs, Emerita analoga Stimpson, Blepharipoda occidentalis Randall, and Lepidopa californica Efford (Anomura, Hippoidea), of exposed sandy beaches. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology. 255, 229-245. Gheskiere T, Vincx M, Weslawski JM, Scapini F, Degraer S (2005). Meiofauna as descriptor of tourism-induced changes at sandy beaches. Marine Environmental Research. 60, 245-265. Hakansson I, Reeder RC (1994). Subsoil compaction by vehicles with high axle load-extent, persistence and crop response. Soil and Tillage Research. 29, 277-304. Henderson C, Levett A, Lisle D (1988). The effects of soil water content and bulk density on the compactibility and soil penetration resistance of some Western Australian sandy soils. Australian Journal of Soil Research. 26, 391-400. Herrick JE, Jones TL (2002). A dynamic cone penetrometer for measuring soil penetration resistance. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 66, 1320-1324. Hosier PE, Eaton TE (1980). The impact of vehicles on dune and grassland vegetation on a south-eastern north Carolina barrier beach. The Journal of Applied Ecology. 17, 173-182. Hyland J, Balthis L, Karakassis I, Magni P, Petrov A, Shine J, Vestergaard O, Warwick R (2005). Organic carbon content of sediments as an indicator of stress in the marine benthos. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 295, 91-103. Isaac NE, Taylor RK, Staggenborg SA, Schrock MD, Leikman DL (2002). Using cone index data to explain in field yield variationed. ASAE Paper. Johnson PD, Brown KM (2000). The importance of microhabitat factors and habitat stability to the threatened Louisiana pearl shell, Margaritifera hembeli (Conrad). Canadian Journal of Zoology. 78, 271-277. Kelaher BP, Levinton JS, Oomen J, Allen BJ, Wong WH (2003). Changes in benthos following the clean-up of a severely metal-polluted cove in the Hudson river estuary: environmental restoration or ecological disturbance? Estuaries. 26, 1505-1516. Kooistra MJ, Boersma OH (1994). Subsoil compaction in Dutch marine sandy loams: loosening practices and effects. Soil and Tillage Research. 29, 237-247. Kutiel P, Zhevelev H, Harrison R (1999). The effect of recreational impacts on soil and vegetation of stabilised Coastal Dunes in the Sharon Park, Israel - design and function of linear conservation areas. Ocean and Coastal Management. 42, 1041-1060. Laboski CAM, Dowdy RH, Allmaras RR, Lamb JA (1998). Soil strength and water content influences on corn root distribution in a sandy soil. Plant and Soil. 203, 239-247. Liddle MJ, Greig-Smith P (1975a). A survey of tracks and paths in a sand dune ecosystem I. Soils. The Journal of Applied Ecology. 12, 893-908. Liddle MJ, Grieg-Smith P (1975b). A survey of tracks and paths in a sand dune ecosystem II. Vegetation. The Journal of Applied Ecology. 12, 909-930. Marion JL, Cole DN (1996). Spatial and temporal variation in soil and vegetation impacts on campsites. Ecological Applications. 6, 520-530. Motavalli PP, Anderson SH, Pengthamkeerati P, Gantzer CJ (2003). Use of soil cone penetrometers to detect the effects of compaction and organic amendments in claypan soils. Soil and Tillage Research. 74, 103-114. Nel R, McLachlan A, Winter DPE (2001). The effect of grain size on the burrowing of two Donax species. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology. 265, 219-238. Omar D, Julio G (2005). Morphodynamics and habitat safety in sandy beaches: life-history adaptations in a supralittoral amphipod. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 293, 143-153. Perdok UD, Kroesbergen B, Hoogmoed WB (2002). Possibilities for modeling the effect of compression on mechanical and physical properties of various Dutch soil types. Soil and Tillage Research. 65, 61-75. Perkins EJ (1958). The hardness of the soil of the shore at Whitstable, Kent. The Journal of Ecology. 46, 71-81. Radford BJ, Wilson-Rummenie AC, Simpson GB, Bell KL, Ferguson MA (2001). Compacted soil affects soil macrofauna populations in a semi-arid environment in central Queensland. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 33, 1869-1872. Robertson PK, Campanella RG (1983). Interpretation of cone penetration tests. Part I: Sand. Canadian Geotechnical Journal. 20, 718–733. Ross MP (2006). Macrofaunal loss and microhabitat destruction: The impact of trampling in a temperate mangrove forest, NSW Australia. Wetlands Ecology and Management. 14, 167-184. Russel RS, Goss MJ (1974). Physical aspects of soil fertility — The response of roots to mechanical impedance. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science. 22, 305–318. Shierlaw J, Alston A (1984). Effect of soil compaction on root growth and uptake of phosphorus. Plant and Soil. 77, 15-28. Simon FT, Judi EH, Alf N, Pip EN, Greig AF, Joanne IE (2003). Habitat change in estuaries: predicting broad-scale responses of intertidal macrofauna to sediment mud content. Marine Ecology Progress Series 263, 101-112. Soane BD, van Ouwerkerk C (1995). Implications of soil compaction in crop production for the quality of the environment. Soil and Tillage Research. 35, 5-22. Soane BD , van Ouwerkerk C (1998). Soil compaction: a global treat to sustainable land use. Advances in Geoecology. 31, 517–525. Thiel M (1999). Duration of extended parental care in marine amphipods. Journal of Crustacean Biology. 19, 60-71. Thomson JD, Weiblen G, Thomson BA, Alfaro S, Legendre P (1996). Untangling Multiple Factors in Spatial Distributions: Lilies, Gophers, and Rocks. Ecology. 77, 1698-1715. Topp GC, Lapen DR, Edwards MJ, Young GD (2003). Laboratory calibration, in-field validation and use of a soil penetrometer measuring cone resistance and water content. Vadose Zone J. 2, 633-641. Warren SD, Nevill MB, Blackburn WH, Garza NE (1986). Soil response to trampling under intensive rotation grazing. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 50, 1337-1341. Wheatcroft RA (2002). In situ measurements of near-surface porosity in shallow-water marine sands. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering. 27, 561-570. Witney BD, Elbanna EB, Oskui KE (1984). Tractor power selection with compaction constraints. In Proceedings of the 8th ISTVS Conferenceed. Cambridge, England, pp. 761-773. Zabinski CA, Gannon JE (1997). Effects of recreational impacts on soil microbial communities. Environmental Management. 21, 233-238. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/27323 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 踩踏與越野車等人類活動都會壓密土壤,也會影響底棲動物的生存與分布。穿刺阻力 (penetration resistance, PR) 是一個方便而有效的壓密程度評估指標,當壓密程度越高,底泥PR就越顯著增加,然而,PR是否同時也是評估底棲動物受影響程度的良好指標則少有研究。為了釐清PR與底棲動物的關聯性,本研究在穿刺阻力有明顯空間差異的沙質潮間帶遊憩區,選擇其他環境條件相近的區域,調查大型底棲無脊椎動物的豐度,包括多毛類、二枚貝、十足類與端腳類 (又細分為大型 (> 4 mm)、中型 (1~4 mm) 和小型 (< 1 mm)),以及PR與其他底泥性質,分析PR和豐度之間的關聯性。各項底泥性質的分析顯示,相對於調查區域中其他底泥性質的均質性,PR呈現出明顯的空間變異,各樣點在0~15 cm深的PR平均值介於0.2~2.2 MPa;對PR平均值和最大豐度之間的迴歸分析則顯示,多毛類、二枚貝與大型、小型端腳類,在PR越高的樣點,其最大豐度有越低的趨勢 (r2 = 0.89, 0.80, 0.54, 0.94, p < 0.05) ,PR最高時最大豐度降低了78~100%;對中型端腳類的最大豐度與PR平均值依深度進一步做分層的迴歸分析時,在中層 (5~10 cm) 與深層 (10~15 cm) 底泥中也同樣具有上述趨勢 (r2 = 0.48, 0.62, p < 0.05) 。這個趨勢顯示,PR的增加形成多毛類、二枚貝與端腳類等底棲無脊椎動物生存上的壓力。由於PR的增加會提高動物在底泥中活動的阻力、降低底泥的孔隙含量,前者可能提高多毛類、二枚貝與端腳類的鑽掘阻力,後者則可能減少小型端腳類的生存空間並降低溶氧在底泥中的通透性。本研究顯示,PR可以評估底棲動物在沙質潮間帶遊憩區的生存壓力,PR有助於底棲生態變化的監測,並可提供人為活動管理之參考。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Human activities, such as trampling and off-road vehicle, compact soil and affect the distribution of benthic macrofauna. As an effective indicator for the degree of compaction, soil penetration resistance (PR) increases as the degree of compaction increases. PR had applied extensively to measure compaction in many fields. However, it’s still poorly understood whether PR is also a good indicator for the effect of human activities on benthic macrofauna. This study investigated the relationships between PR and macrofauna on an intertidal sandy beach of recreational area. The abundance of macrofauna and sediments properties including PR were measured where sediment properties were uniform except for PR. Macrofauna were grouped into Polychaeta, Bivalvia, Decapoda and Amphipoda. Amphipoda was further classified into large (> 4 mm in body length), middle (1~4 mm) and small (< 1 mm) size. Abundance of each macrofauna group was analyzed with different degree of PR. The results showed that PR exhibited higher variance than other sediment properties, ranging from 0.2 to 2.2 MPa of PR average on 0~15 cm depth. Regression analysis between PR average and max abundance of Polychaeta, Bivalvia, large Amphipoda and small Amphipoda showed similar trend (r2 = 0.89, 0.80, 0.54, 0.94, p < 0.05), the higher the PR average, the lower the max abundance, which can decreased 78 to 100% as PR increased from lowest to highest. Further regression analysis between PR average and max abundance of middle Amphipoda on 5~10 cm and 10~15 cm depth layers also showed the same trend (r2 = 0.48, 0.62, p < 0.05) as described above. This trend implies the increase of PR is a stress for benthic macrofauna such as Polychaeta, Bivalvia and Amphipoda. The increase of PR represents an increase of resistance to activities in sediments and decrease of porosity in sediments, the former may increase resistance of burrowing by Polychaeta, Bivalve and Amphipoda, and the latter may decrease pore space accessible for small Amphipoda and lower permeability to oxygen in sediments. This study suggests that PR is a good indicator to evaluate the stress to benthic macrofauna, and this would apply to monitor benthic ecology and manage human activities on an intertidal sandy beach. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-12T18:01:15Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-97-R93b45022-1.pdf: 3903518 bytes, checksum: fed44445fadd632849e0fcecc345062a (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 中文摘要.........................................................................................Ⅰ
英文摘要..............................................................................................Ⅱ 目錄.................................................................................................Ⅳ 圖目錄............................................................................................Ⅵ 表目錄.............................................................................................Ⅶ 第一章 前言.......................................................................................1 第1節 土壤壓密現象...............................................................1 第2節 壓密的評估方法...........................................................2 第3節 穿刺阻力的生態意義.....................................................3 第4節 研究目的....................................................................6 第二章 材料與方法.............................................................................7 第1節 研究地點.....................................................................7 第2節 實驗設計....................................................................8 2-1 調查範圍的規劃........................................................8 2-1-1 PR的涵蓋範圍要廣泛...............................................8 2-1-2 其他環境因子的變異要小...........................................8 2-1-3 高程相近................................................................8 2-2 採樣規劃.................................................................9 第3節 採樣與分析方法........................................................11 3-1 環境變數.............................................................11 3-1-1 沉積物粒徑........................................................11 3-1-2 TOC與TN.......................................................11 3-1-3 相對重量含水量.....................................................11 3-1-4 鹽度與pH.......................................................12 3-1-5 壓密相關因子.......................................................12 3-1-6 穿刺阻力.............................................................13 3-2 生物變數.............................................................14 第4節 統計分析................................................................15 第三章 結果.......................................................................................17 第1節 環境變數..............................................................17 1-1 整體環境變數.......................................................17 1-2 穿刺阻力.............................................................18 1-2-1 穿刺阻力剖面群集..................................................18 1-2-2 穿刺阻力平均值...............................................19 第2節 生物變數................................................................20 第3節 穿刺阻力與豐度的關聯性............................................21 3-1 穿刺阻力剖面群集與豐度的關聯性...........................21 3-2 穿刺阻力平均值與豐度的關聯性..............................22 第四章 討論......................................................................................25 第1節 整體環境變數...............................................................25 第2節 穿刺阻力................................................................27 第3節 穿刺阻力與生物豐度的關聯性.........................................29 3-1 群集分析與最適曲線分析結果的比較...............................29 3-2 最適曲線的趨勢.............................................................30 3-3 鑽掘阻力...................................................................31 3-4 生存空間................................................................33 3-5 底泥通透性..............................................................33 3-6 其他PR相關因素.......................................................................34 3-7 PR在底棲生態的應用潛力.....................................................34 3-7 未來研究方向.....................................................35 第4節 結論......................................................................36 參考文獻..........................................................................................37 圖...................................................................................................43 表...................................................................................................57 附錄(一) 端腳類型態照片....................................................................65 附錄(二) 原始資料...............................................................................69 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 底泥穿刺阻力與沙質潮間帶大型底棲無脊椎動物豐度的關係 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Relationships between penetration resistance of sediments and abundance of benthic macrofauna on an intertidal sandy beach | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 96-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 謝蕙蓮,林幸助,王建平 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 壓密,穿刺阻力,潮間帶,大型底棲無脊椎動物,最大豐度, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | sediment compaction,penetration resistance,intertidal zone,benthic macrofauna,maximum abundance, | en |
dc.relation.page | 77 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2008-01-28 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生命科學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 漁業科學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 漁業科學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-97-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 3.81 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。