請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/27190
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 曾美惠((Mei-Hui Tseng) | |
dc.contributor.author | Cheng Tzu-Jung | en |
dc.contributor.author | 陳姿蓉 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-12T17:57:32Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2010-02-20 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2008-02-20 | |
dc.date.issued | 2008 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2008-01-30 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Adamson, A., O’Hare, A, & Graham, C. (2006). Impairments in sensory modulation in children with autistic spectrum disorder. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 69, 357-364.
Ahn, R. R., Miller, L. J., Milberger, S., & McIntosh, D. N. (2004). Prevalence of parents’ perceptions of sensory processing disorders among kindergarten children. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 58, 287–293. American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Forth Edition—Text Revision). Washington, DC: Author. Ayers, A. J. (1979). Sensory Integration and the Child.. Los Angle: Western Psychological Services. Baranek, G. T. (2002). Efficacy of sensory and motor interventions for children with autism. Journal of Autism Developmental Disorder, 32, 397– 422. Baranek, G. T., David, F. J., Poe, M. D., Stone, W. L., & Watson, L. R. (2006). Sensory Experiences Questionnaire: discriminating sensory features in young children with autism, developmental delays, and typical development. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47(6), 591-601. Baranek, G.T., Foster, L. G., & Berkson, G. (1997a). Sensory defensiveness in persons with developmental disabilities. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 17, 173-185. Baranek, G. T., Foster, L. G., & Berkson, G. (1997b). Tactile defensiveness and stereotyped behaviors. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 51, 91–95. Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-culture adaptation of self-report measure. Spine, 25, 3186-3191. Bennett, J. W., & Peterson, C, Q. (1995). The Touch Inventory for Elementary-School-Aged Children: Test-retest reliability and mother-child correlations. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 49, 795-801. Bundy, A. C. & Murray, E. A. (2002). Sensory modulation. In A. C. Bundy, S. J. Lane, & E. A. Murray (Eds.), Sensory integration: theory and practice (2nd ed., pp. 3-33). Philadelphia: F. A. Davis. Change, C. (1999). Interrater reliability of the evaluation of Sensory Processing (ESP). Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Southern California, Los Angles. Case-Smith, J. (1997). Clinical interpretation of “factor analysis on the sensory profile from a national sample of children without disabilities”. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 51, 496–499. Case-Smith, J. (2005). Development of childhood occupation. In J. Case-Smith (Ed.), Occupational Therapy for Children (5th ed., pp. 88–116). St. Louis: Mosby. Case-Smith, J., & Miller, H. (1999). Occupational therapy with children with pervasive developmental disorders. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 53, 506–513. Cohn, E., Miller, L. J., & Tickle-Degnen, L. (2000). Parental hopes for therapy outcomes: Children with sensory modulation disorders. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 54, 36–43. Coster, W., Deeney, T., Haltiwanger, J., & Haley, S. (1998). School Function Assessment. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Cooperation. Chow, S. M. K. (2005). The suitability of the Sensory Profile for diagnosing sensory modulation dysfunctions in Chinese children. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 28, 153–158. Dahlgren, S. V., & Gillberg, C. (1989). Symptoms in the first two years of life: a preliminary population study of infantile autism. European Archives of Psychiatry and Neurological Science, 238, 169-174. Davies, P. L., & Gavin, W. J. (2007). Validating the diagnosis of sensory processing disorders using EEG technology. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 61, 176–189. Dawson, G., & Watling, R. (2000). Interventions to facilitate auditory, visual, and motor integration in autism: A review of evidence. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 30, 415–421. Dunn, W. (1994). Performance of typical children on the Sensory Profile: an item analysis. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 48, 967–974. Dunn, W. (1999). The Sensory Profile: Examiner’s manual. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation. Dunn, W. (1997). The impact of sensory processing abilities on the daily lives of young children and families: A conceptual model. Infants and Young Children, 9(4), 23–25. Dunn, W. (2001). The sensations of everyday life: Empirical, theoretical, and pragmatic considerations, 2001 Eleanor Clarke Slagle lecture. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 55, 608–620. Dunn, W., & Bennett, D. (2002). Patterns of sensory processing in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 22, 1, 4-15. Dunn, E., & Brown, C. (1997). Factor analysis on the Sensory Profile from a national sample of children without disabilities. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 51, 490-495. Dunn, W., Myles, B. S., & Orr, S. (2002). Sensory processing issues associated with Asperger syndrome: a preliminary investigation. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 56, 97-102. Dunn, W., & Westman, K. (1997). The Sensory Profile: the performance of anational sample of children with and without disabilities. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 51, 25-33. Ermer, J., & Dunn, W. (1998). The Sensory Profile: a discriminant analysis of children with and without disabilities. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 52, 283-290. Gillberg, C., Ehler, S., Schaumann, H., Jakobsson, G., Dahlgren, S. V., Lindblom, R., Bagenholm, A., Tjuus, T., & Blidner, E. (1990). Autism under age 3 years: a clinical study of 28 cases referred for autistic symptoms in infancy. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 31, 921-934. Godfrey, K. (1985). Statistics in practice: Comparing the means of several groups. New England Journal of Medicine, 313, 1450-1456. Hotz, S. D., Royeen, C. B. (1998). Perception of behaviors associated with tactile defensiveness: An exploration of the differences between mothers and their children. Occupational Therapy International, 5(4), 281-292. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives, Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55. Huebner,R. A. (1992). Autistic disorder: a neuropsychological enigma. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 46, 487–501. Iarocci, G., & McDonald, J. (2006). Sensory integration and the perceptual experience of persons with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36, 77-90. Johnson-Ecker, C. L., & Parham, D. (2000). The evaluation of sensory processing: a validity study using contrasting group. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 54, 494–503. Jöreskog. K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1989). LISREL 7: A guide to the program and applications. Chicago: SPSS. Kientz, M. A., & Dunn, W. (1997). A comparison of the performance of children with and without autism on the sensory profile. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 51, 530–537. Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. New York: Guilford Press. Kinnealey, M. (1998). Princess or tyrant: A case report of a child with sensory defensiveness. Occupational Therapy International, 5(4), 293-303. Lane, S. J.(2002). Sensory modulation. In A. C. Bundy, S. J. Lane, & E. A. Murray (Eds.), Sensory integration: theory and practice (2nd ed., pp. 101-122). Philadelphia: F. A. Davis. Larson, K. (1982). The sensory history of developmentally delayed children with and without tactile defensiveness. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 36, 590-596. Lee, J. R. V. (1999). Parenting with children with autism on the Evaluation of Sensory Processing(ESP). Unpublish master’s thesis, University of Southern California, Los Angles. Li, S. H., & Chang, M. C. (2004). Research on leisure activities of the fifth and sixth graders in elementary schools of Nei- hu district Taipei city. Unpublished master dissertation, Taipei Municipal Teachers College, Taipei, Taiwan. Mangeot, S. D., Miller, L. J., McIntosh, D.N., McGrath-Clark, J., Simon, J., Hagerman, R. J., & Goldson, E.(2001). Sensory modulation dysfunction in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 43, 399-406. McIntosh, D. N., Miller, L. J., Shyu, V., & Hagerman, R. (1999). Sensory-modulation disruption, electrodermal responses, and functional behaviors. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 41, 608–615. Miller, L. J., Coll, J. R., & Schoen, S. A. (2007). A randomized controlled pilot study of the effectiveness of occupational therapy for children with sensory modulation disorder. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 61, 228–238. Miller, L. J. & Lane, S. (2000). Toward to a consensus in terminology of sensory integration theory and practice: Part 1: Taxonomy of neurophysiologic processes. Sensory Integration Special Interest Quarterly, 23(1), 1-4. Miller, L. J., Reisman, J. E., McIntosh, D. N., & Simon, J. (2001). An ecological model of sensory modulation: performance of children with fragil X syndrome, autistic disorder, attention-deficit/ hyperactivity disorder, and sensory modulation dysfunction. In S. S. Roley, E. I. Blanche, & R. C. Schaaf (Eds.), Understanding the Nature of Sensory Integration with Diverse Populations (pp. 57-88). San Antonio, TX: Therapy Skill Builders. Miller, L. J., Schoen, S. A., James, K., & Schaaf, R. C. (2007). Lessons learned: A pilot study on occupational therapy effectiveness for children with sensory modulation disorder. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 61, 161–169. Miller-Kuhaneck, H., Henry, D. A., Glennon, T. J., & Mu, K. (2007). Development of the Sensory Processing Measure–School: Initial studies of reliability and validity. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 61, 170–175. Myles, B. S., Hagiwara, T., Dunn, W., Rinner, L., & Reese. M.(2004). Sensory Issues in Children with Asperger Syndrome and Autism. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 39, 283–290. Neuman, A. (2006). Patterns of response to sensory stimuli encountered in daily activities A comparison between 3-10-year-old Israeli and American children without disabilities. Occupational Therapy International, 13, 79-99. Neuman, A., Greenberg, D. F., Labovitz, D. R., & Suzuki, L. A. (2004). Cross-adaptation of the Sensory Profile: establishing linguistic equivalency of the Hebrew version. Occupational Therapy International, 11, 112-130. O’Neill, M., & Jones, R. S. (1997). Sensory-perceptual abnormalities in autism: A case for more research? Journal of Autism Developmental Disability, 27, 283–293. Parham, L. D., & Mailloux, Z. (2005). Sensory integration. In J. Case-Smith (Ed.), Occupational Therapy for Children (5th ed., pp. 356–411). St. Louis: Mosby. Portney, L.G., & Watkins, M. P. (2000). Foundations of Clinical Research: Application to Practice(2nd ed.). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc. Pfeiffer, B. Kinnealey, M., Reed, C., & Herzberg, G. (2005). Sensory modulation and afeective disorders in children and adolescents with Asperger’s disorder. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 59, 335-345. Provost, B., & Oetter, P. (1993). The Sensory Rating Scale for infants and young children: Development and re liability. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 13(4), 15–35. Rogers, S.J., Hepburn, S., & Wehner, E. (2003). Parent reports of sensory symptoms in toddlers with autism and those with other developmental disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 33, 631–642. Roger, S. J., & Ozonoff, S. (2005). Annotation: What do we know about sensory dysfunction in autism- A critical review of the empirical evidence. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46, 1255-1268. Rovinelli, F. J., & Hambleton, R. K. (1977). On the use of content specialists in the assessment of criterion-referenced test item validity. Dutch Journal for Educational Research, 2, 49–60. Royeen, C. B. (1986). The development of a touch scale for measuring tactile defensiveness in children. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 40, 414-419. Royeen, C. B. (1987a). Test retest reliability of a touch scale for tactile defensiveness. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 7, 45-52. Royeen, C. B. (1987b).TIP-Touch Inventory for Preschoolers: A pilot study. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 7, 29-40. Royeen, C. B., & Fortune, J. C. (1990). Touch Inventory for Elementary School Aged children. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 44, 155-159. Royeen, C, B., & Mu, K. (2003). Stability of tactile defensiveness across cultures: European and American children's responses to the Touch Inventory for Elementary School Aged Children (TIE). Occupational Therapy International, 10(3), 165-174. Schaaf, R. C., Miller, L. J., Seawell, D., & O’Keefe, S. (2003). Children with disturbances in sensory processing: A pilot study examining the role of the parasympathetic system. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 57, 442-449. Schaaf, R. C., & Miller, L. J. (2005). Occupational therapy using a sensory integration approach for children with developmental disabilities. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 11, 143-148. Satiansukpong, N. (2002). Reliability and validity of Dunn's Sensory Profile among Thai children living in large metropolitan areas. (Doctoral dissertation, New York University, 2002). Dissertation Abstracts International, 114. Stephens, C. L., & Royeen, C. B. (1998). Investigating of tactile defensiveness and self-esteem in typically developing children. Occupational Therapy International, 5(4), 273-280. Su, C. T. (2001). Introduction of the Evaluation of Sensory Processing and its translations for use in Taiwan. Journal of Occupational Therapy Association, R.O.C., 19, 60-70. Talay-Organ, A., & Wood, K. (2000). Unusual sensory sensitivities in autism: a possible crossroads. International Journal of Disabilities Development and Education, 47, 201-212. Tomchek, S. D., & Dunn, W. (2007). Sensory processing in children with and without autism: A comparative study using the Short Sensory Profile. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 61, 190–200. Tseng, M. H., Lin, C. K., & Hsiao, S. Y. (2000). Sensory Processing in Children with Autism--A Pilot Study. Formosan Journal of Medicine, 4, 609-620. Watling, R., Dietz, J., Kanny, E. M., & McLaughlin, J. F. (1999). Current practice of occupational therapy for children with autism. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 53, 498–505. Watling, R., Dietz, J., & White, O. (2001). Comparison of sensory profile scores of young children with and without autism spectrum disorders. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 55, 416–423. Watling, R., Tomchek, S. & LaVesser, P. (2005). The scope of occupational therapy services for individuals with autism spectrum disorders across the life span. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 59, 680-683. Watling, R., Dietz, J., Kanny, E. M., McLaughlin, J. F. (1999). Current practice of occupational therapy for children with autism. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 53, 498-505. White, B. P., Mulligan, S., Merrill, K., & Wright, J. (2007). An examination of the relationships between motor and process skills and scores on the Sensory Profile. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 61, 154-160. Yochman,A., Parush, S., & Ornoy, A.(2004).Responses of preschool children with and without ADHD to sensory events in daily life. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 58, 294-302. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/27190 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 研究目的:感覺史量表已在多個國家被廣泛地用來評估孩童的感覺問題。本研究將翻譯感覺史量表為中文版本、檢驗其心理計量特性,並進一步使用中文版感覺史量表來探討正常發展孩童與自閉症孩童對一般感覺事件的反應特徵。
方法:翻譯感覺史量表為中文版本,並由三位專家進行內容效度審查。949位3-10歲正常發展孩童的家長有效填答中文版感覺史量表(平均年齡7.3歲,標準差2.42,482位男童,467位女童)。內部一致性取樣樣本為949位孩童,間隔三星期之再測信度取樣30位自閉症孩童(平均年齡5.80歲,標準差2.07,24位男童,6位女童)。區辨效度則是比較53位自閉症孩童與53位正常發展孩童在感覺史量表分數上差異,並事先配對其年齡(平均年齡5.83,標準差1.53)與性別(82男童,24女童)。建構效度則是使用驗證性因素分析來檢驗原版感覺史量表的九因素模式是否適用於台灣孩童。 結果:70%的中文版感覺史量表題目對正常發展孩童而言是不尋常的行為。中文版感覺史量表具備可接受∼好的內部一致性(Cronbach’s α=.62 -.90)、好的總分之再測信度(ICC=.79),不佳∼好的分測驗分數及因素分數之再測信度(ICC=.44 - .90)。驗證性因素分析則支持原本的九因素模式(SRMR = 0.068, RMSEA = 0.063, NNFI = 0.94, and CFI =0.94)。中文版感覺史量表的所有分測驗及因素均能區辨正常發展孩童與自閉症孩童,約50%題目可區辨這兩個族群。 結論:本研究結果顯示,中文版感覺史量表是一個可信且有效的工具,適用於評量台灣孩童的感覺處理功能。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Objects: The Sensory Profile (SP) has been widely used in evaluating a child’s sensory processing in Western countries. In this study, we translated, culturally adapted the SP into Chinese, and examined the psychometric properties for its cross-culture use in Taiwan. Furthermore, the responses to common sensory events of typically-developing and autistic children were evaluated by using the Chinese version SP.
Methods: The SP was translated and cross-culturally adapted into Chinese. Content validity was evaluated by 3 experts. Parents of 949 typically-developing children with the age of 3 to 10 years (mean age = 7.3 years, SD = 2.42, 482 males, 467 females) completed the adapted questionnaires. Internal consistency was determined using the data of 949 typically-developing children. Test-retest reliability was examined using 30 children with autism (mean age = 5.80 years, SD = 1.07, 24 males, 6 females) in a 3-week interval. Discriminate validity were examined by comparing the Chinese version SP scores between 53 children with autism and 53 children without autism matched for age (mean age = 5.83 years, SD = 1.53) and gender (82 males, 24 females).Construct validity was examined using confirmatory factor analysis to investigate if the 9-factor model of the original SP was applicable to Taiwanese data. Results: Seventy percents of items on the Chinese version SP were uncommon behaviors for typically-developing children. The Chinese version SP demonstrated acceptable to good internal consistency (Cronbach’s α=.62 -.90), good test-retest reliability for total scores (ICC=.79), and poor to good test-retest reliability for each section scores and each factor scores (ICC=.44 - .90). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Chinese version SP provided strong support for a nine-factor model (SRMR = 0.068, RMSEA = 0.063, NNFI = 0.94, and CFI =0.94). The performance of children with autism was significantly different from that of typically-developing children on all sections and factors. Nearly 50% of items contributed to the significant difference between groups. Conclusions: Findings from the studies suggest that the Chinese version SP is a reliable and valid instrument for evaluating children’s sensory processing functions in Taiwan. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-12T17:57:32Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-97-R94429005-1.pdf: 806832 bytes, checksum: d0ceba9c3b51b44dd83be3c5619b4508 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | Abstract………………………………………………….. I
中文摘要………………………………………………… III Table of Contents………………………………………... V List of Tables…………………………………………….. VII List of Figures…………………………………………… IX Introduction……………………………………………... 1 Literature Review……………………………………….. 6 Sensory Processing Disorders (SPD)……………………….. 6 Sensory Processing Disorders in Autism………………….. 9 Parent-report Questionnaires for Children with SPD…. 11 Dunn’s Model of Sensory Processing…………………….. 18 Methods………………………………………………….. 22 Instrument………………………………………………….. 22 Procedure…………………………………………………... 26 Participants…………………………………………………. 30 Data analysis……………………………………………….... 31 Results…………………………………………………… 37 Gender & Age Comparisons…………………………………… 37 Frequency of Occurrence of Behaviors…………………... 40 Reliability of the Chinese version SP………………….. 42 Validity of the Chinese version SP………………………. 43 Discussions………………………………………………. 45 Frequency of Occurrence of Behaviors…………………... 45 Reliability…………………………………………………... 46 Construct Validity……………………………………………. 47 Discriminant Validity…………………………………………. 48 Limitations and Suggestions for Further Research……. 50 Conclusions…………………………………………….... 52 References……………………………………………….. 53 Tables…………………………………………………….. 63 Figures…………………………………………………… 102 Appendix………………………………………………… 103 Appendix 1 The Chinese version Sensory Profile……. 103 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 中文版感覺史量表發展暨信效度研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Development of the Chinese Version Sensory Profile: A reliability and validity study | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 96-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 姚開屏(Kai-Ping Yao),蘇佳廷(Chia-Ting Su) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 感覺,感覺統合,感覺處理,感覺處理障礙,兒童職能治療, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | sensation,sensory integration,sensory processing,sensory processing disorders,pediatric occupational therapy, | en |
dc.relation.page | 110 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2008-01-30 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 醫學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 職能治療研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 職能治療學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-97-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 787.92 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。