請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/27125
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 湯佩芳(Pei-Fang Tang) | |
dc.contributor.author | Wen-Hsing Chang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 張文馨 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-12T17:55:57Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2009-02-20 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2008-02-20 | |
dc.date.issued | 2008 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2008-02-01 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 1. Berg k, Wood-Dauphinee S, Williams JI, Gayton D. Measuring balance in the elderly: preliminary development of an instrument. Phsiother Can 1989; 41: 304-311.
2. Bouisset S, Richardson J, Zattara M. Are amplitude and duration of anticipatory postural adjustments identically scaled to focal movement parameters in humans? Neurosci Lett 2000; 278: 153-156. 3. Boussaoud D. Attention versus intention in the primate premotor cortex. Neuroimage 2001; 14: S40-S45. 4. Brauer SG, Burns YR. The influence of preparedness on rapid stepping in young and older adults. Clin Rehabil 2002; 16: 741-748. 5. Brunt D, Lafferty MJ, Mckeon A, Goode B, Mulhausen C, Polk P. Invariant characteristics of gait initiation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1991; 70: 206-212. 6. Brunt D, Vander Linden DW, Behrman AL. The relation between limb loading and control parameters of gait initiation in persons with stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995; 76: 627-634. 7. Burleigh AL, Horak FB, Malouin F. Modification of postural responses and step initiation: evidence for goal-directed postural interactions. J Neurophysiol 1994; 72: 2892-2902. 8. Cheng PT, Chen CL, Wang CM, Hong WH. Leg muscle activation patterns of sit-to-stand movement in stroke patients. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 83: 10-16. 9. Churchland MM, Santhanam G, Shenoy KV. Preparatory activity in premotor and motor cortex reflects the speed of the upcoming reach. J Neurophysiol 2006; 96: 3130-3146. 10. Cisek P, Kalaska JF. Neural correlates of reaching decisions in dorsal premotor cortex: specification of multiple direction choices and final selection of action. Neuron 2005; 45: 801-814. 11. Crenna P, Frigo C. A motor programme for the initiation of forward-oriented movements in humans. J Physiol 1991; 437: 635-653. 12. Dick JP, Rothwell JC, Berardelli A et al. Associated postural adjustments in Parkinson's disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1986; 49: 1378-1385. 13. do Nascimento OF, Nielsen KD, Voigt M. Influence of directional orientations during gait initiation and stepping on movement-related cortical potentials. Behav Brain Res 2005; 161: 141-154. 14. Duncan PW. Stroke disability. Phys Ther 1994; 74: 399-407. 15. Duncan PW, Propst M, Nelson SG. Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer assessment of sensorimotor recovery following cerebrovascular accident. Phys Ther 1983; 63: 1606-1610. 16. Elble RJ, Moody C, Leffler K, Sinha R. The initiation of normal walking. Mov Disord 1994; 9: 139-146. 17. Elias LJ, Bryden MP, Bulman-Fleming MB. Footedness is a better predictor than is handedness of emotional lateralization. Neuropsychologia 1998; 36: 37-43. 18. Fogassi L, Luppino G. Motor functions of the parietal lobe. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2005; 15: 626-631. 19. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. 'Mini-mental state'. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975; 12: 189-198. 20. Forster A, Young J. Incidence and consequences of falls due to stroke: a systematic inquiry. Br Med J 1995; 311: 83-86. 21. Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med 1975; 7: 13-31. 22. Garland SJ, Stevenson TJ, Ivanova T. Postural responses to unilateral arm perturbation in young, elderly, and hemiplegic subjects. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997; 78: 1072-1077. 23. Graafmans WC, Ooms ME, Hofstee HM, Bezemer PD, Bouter LM, Lips P. Falls in the elderly: a prospective study of risk factors and risk profiles. Am J Epidemiol 1996; 143: 1129-1136. 24. Grace J, Nadler JD, White DA et al. Folstein vs modified Mini-Mental State Examination in geriatric stroke. Stability, validity, and screening utility. Arch Neurol 1995; 52: 477-484. 25. Gregson JM, Leathley M, Moore AP, Sharma AK, Smith TL, Watkins CL. Reliability of the Tone Assessment Scale and the modified Ashworth scale as clinical tools for assessing poststroke spasticity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999; 80: 1013-1016. 26. Halsband U, Freund HJ. Premotor cortex and conditional motor learning in man. Brain 1990; 113 ( Pt 1): 207-222. 27. Halsband U, Passingham RE. Premotor cortex and the conditions for movement in monkeys (Macaca fascicularis). Behav Brain Res 1985; 18: 269-277. 28. Haridas C, Gordon IT, Misiaszek JE. Walking delays anticipatory postural adjustments but not reaction times in a choice reaction task. Exp Brain Res 2005; 163: 440-444. 29. Harris JE, Eng JJ, Marigold DS, Tokuno CD, Louis CL. Relationship of balance and mobility to fall incidence in people with chronic stroke. Phys Ther 2005; 85: 150-158. 30. Hill KD, Bernhardt J, McGann AM, Berkovits D. A new test of dynamic standing balance for stroke patients: reliability, validity and comparison with healthy elderly. Phsiother Can 1996; 48: 257-262. 31. Horak FB. Assumptions underlying motor control for neurologic rehabilitation. In: Lister MJ, editor. Contemporary Management of Motor Control Problems : Proceedings of the II STEP Conference. Alexandria, VA: Foundation for Physical Therapy; 1991. p. 11-27. 32. Horak FB, Esselman P, Anderson ME, Lynch MK. The effects of movement velocity, mass displaced, and task certainty on associated postural adjustments made by normal and hemiplegic individuals. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1984; 47: 1020-1028. 33. Hoshi E, Tanji J. Distinctions between dorsal and ventral premotor areas: anatomical connectivity and functional properties. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2007; 17: 234-242. 34. Hyndman D, Ashburn A, Stack E. Fall events among people with stroke living in the community: circumstances of falls and characteristics of fallers. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002; 83: 165-170. 35. Ito T, Azuma T, Yamashita N. Anticipatory control in the initiation of a single step under biomechanical constraints in humans. Neurosci Lett 2003; 352: 207-210. 36. Jones RN, Gallo JJ. Dimensions of the Mini-Mental State Examination among community dwelling older adults. Psychol Med 2000; 30: 605-618. 37. Kably B, Drew T. Corticoreticular pathways in the cat. I. Projection patterns and collaterization. J Neurophysiol 1998; 80: 389-405. 38. Kurata K. Information processing for motor control in primate premotor cortex. Behav Brain Res 1994; 61: 135-142. 39. Kurata K, Hoffman DS. Differential effects of muscimol microinjection into dorsal and ventral aspects of the premotor cortex of monkeys. J Neurophysiol 1994; 71: 1151-1164. 40. Kurata K, Wise SP. Premotor cortex of rhesus monkeys: set-related activity during two conditional motor tasks. Exp Brain Res 1988; 69: 327-343. 41. Lamb SE, Ferrucci L, Volapto S, Fried LP, Guralnik JM. Risk factors for falling in home-dwelling older women with stroke: the Women's Health and Aging Study. Stroke 2003; 34: 494-501. 42. MacKinnon CD, Bissig D, Chiusano J et al. Preparation of anticipatory postural adjustments prior to stepping. J Neurophysiol 2007; 97: 4368-4379. 43. Mackintosh SF, Goldie P, Hill K. Falls incidence and factors associated with falling in older, community-dwelling, chronic stroke survivors (> 1 year after stroke) and matched controls. Aging Clin Exp Res 2005a; 17: 74-81. 44. Mackintosh SF, Hill K, Dodd KJ, Goldie P, Culham E. Falls and injury prevention should be part of every stroke rehabilitation plan. Clin Rehabil 2005b; 19: 441-451. 45. Mao HF, Hsueh IP, Tang PF, Sheu CF, Hsieh CL. Analysis and comparison of the psychometric properties of three balance measures for stroke patients. Stroke 2002; 33: 1022-1027. 46. Massion J, Ioffe M, Schmitz C, Viallet F, Gantcheva R. Acquisition of anticipatory postural adjustments in a bimanual load-lifting task: normal and pathological aspects. Exp Brain Res 1999; 128: 229-235. 47. McIlroy WE, Maki BE. Early activation of arm muscles follows external perturbation of upright stance. Neurosci Lett 1995; 184: 177-180. 48. Medell JL, Alexander NB. A clinical measure of maximal and rapid stepping in older women. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2000; 55: M429-M433. 49. Mercer VS, Sahrmann SA, ggles-Buckles V, Abrams RA. Age group differences in postural adjustments associated with a stepping task. J Mot Behav 1997; 29: 243-253. 50. Mickelborough J, van der Linden ML, Tallis RC, Ennos AR. Muscle activity during gait initiation in normal elderly people. Gait Posture 2004; 19: 50-57. 51. Nyberg L, Gustafson Y. Fall prediction index for patients in stroke rehabilitation. Stroke 1997; 28: 716-721. 52. Palmer E, Downes L, Ashby P. Associated postural adjustments are impaired by a lesion of the cortex. Neurology 1996; 46: 471-475. 53. Paradiso G, Cunic D, Saint-Cyr JA et al. Involvement of human thalamus in the preparation of self-paced movement. Brain 2004; 127: 2717-2731. 54. Passingham RE. Premotor cortex and preparation for movement. Exp Brain Res 1988; 70: 590-596. 55. Pellijeff A, Bonilha L, Morgan PS, McKenzie K, Jackson SR. Parietal updating of limb posture: An event-related fMRI study. Neuropsychologia 2006. 56. Polcyn AF, Lipsitz LA, Kerrigan DC, Collins JJ. Age-related changes in the initiation of gait: degradation of central mechanisms for momentum generation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998; 79: 1582-1589. 57. Rushworth MF, Johansen-Berg H, Gobel SM, Devlin JT. The left parietal and premotor cortices: motor attention and selection. Neuroimage 2003; 20 Suppl 1: S89-100. 58. Schenkenberg T, Bradford DC, Ajax ET. Line bisection and unilateral visual neglect in patients with neurologic impairment. Neurology 1980; 30: 509-517. 59. Schepens B, Drew T. Independent and convergent signals from the pontomedullary reticular formation contribute to the control of posture and movement during reaching in the cat. J Neurophysiol 2004; 92: 2217-2238. 60. Schluter ND, Krams M, Rushworth MF, Passingham RE. Cerebral dominance for action in the human brain: the selection of actions. Neuropsychologia 2001; 39: 105-113. 61. Schluter ND, Rushworth MF, Mills KR, Passingham RE. Signal-, set-, and movement-related activity in the human premotor cortex. Neuropsychologia 1999; 37: 233-243. 62. Schluter ND, Rushworth MF, Passingham RE, Mills KR. Temporary interference in human lateral premotor cortex suggests dominance for the selection of movements. A study using transcranial magnetic stimulation. Brain 1998; 121 ( Pt 5): 785-799. 63. Simon SR, Meunier M, Piettre L, Berardi AM, Segebarth CM, Boussaoud D. Spatial attention and memory versus motor preparation: premotor cortex involvement as revealed by fMRI. J Neurophysiol 2002; 88: 2047-2057. 64. Slijper H, Latash ML, Mordkoff JT. Anticipatory postural adjustments under simple and choice reaction time conditions. Brain Res 2002; 924: 184-197. 65. Stapleton T, Ashburn A, Stack E. A pilot study of attention deficits, balance control and falls in the subacute stage following stroke. Clin Rehabil 2001; 15: 437-444. 66. Takashima Y, Yao H, Koga H et al. Frontal lobe dysfunction caused by multiple lacunar infarction in community-dwelling elderly subjects. J Neurol Sci 2003; 214: 37-41. 67. Tutuarima JA, van der Meulen JH, de Haan RJ, van SA, Limburg M. Risk factors for falls of hospitalized stroke patients. Stroke 1997; 28: 297-301. 68. Viallet F, Massion J, Massarino R, Khalil R. Coordination between posture and movement in a bimanual load lifting task: putative role of a medial frontal region including the supplementary motor area. Exp Brain Res 1992; 88: 674-684. 69. Wade DT, Collen FM, Robb GF, Warlow CP. Physiotherapy intervention late after stroke and mobility. Br Med J 1992; 304: 609-613. 70. Weinrich M, Wise SP. The premotor cortex of the monkey. J Neurosci 1982; 2: 1329-1345. 71. Weinrich M, Wise SP, Mauritz KH. A neurophysiological study of the premotor cortex in the rhesus monkey. Brain 1984; 107 ( Pt 2): 385-414. 72. Wise SP, Di PG, Boussaoud D. Primate premotor cortex: dissociation of visuomotor from sensory signals. J Neurophysiol 1992; 68: 969-972. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/27125 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 目的:探討前動作皮質區受損與未受損之中風病患及年齡相當的健康成年人,在執行快速向前跨步動作時預期性姿勢控制及下肢動作選擇表現的差異。方法:共計13位栓塞性首度中風且大腦皮質區受損的中風病患參與此研究,其中前動作皮質區受損者(PMC+組)有6位,前動作皮質區未受損者有7位(PMC-組)。另有8位年齡性別與中風病患相當的健康受試者作為對照組。當受試者看到跨步訊號出現時,受試者需以最快的速度向前跨步。跨步動作測試情境依跨步訊號之預期程度分為兩種情境:簡單反應時間(simple reaction time, SRT)情境與選項反應時間(choice reaction time, SRT)情境。本研究以動作反應正確率(behavioral response accuracy rate)及反應時間(reaction time, RT)探討下肢動作選擇表現。以行為與肌電整體反應之型態分佈(distribution of the combined behavioral-EMG response patterns)、脛前肌作用潛時(TA onset latency)及脛前肌-自主動作潛時(TA-Movement latency) 探討跨步時之預期性姿勢控制。結果與討論:所有受試者之動作反應正確率沒有顯著組間差異,但前動作皮質區受損組患腳跨步之反應時間有較健康受試組長之趨勢(p = .059; 效應值(effect size) = .94),表示前動作皮質區受損組需要較長的時間來選擇正確的跨步反應。預期性姿勢控制方面,前動作皮質區受損組在選擇情境下,脛前肌較腓腸肌延遲出現的跨步次數皆顯著較健康受試者多(p = .007)。且其站立腳之脛前肌作用潛時在以健側腳(p = .040)和患側腳(p = .024)跨步時皆顯著較健康受試組延遲。然而其脛前肌-自主動作潛時卻沒有顯著組間差異,這些結果表示前動作皮質區受損不只會影響患側腳的預期性姿勢控制,同時也會藉由皮質下的傳導路徑影響健側腳的姿勢準備。本文最後提出了一個前動作皮質區參與預期性姿勢控制及動作選擇之假說式模型(hypothetical model)。結論:本研究結果提供了前動作皮質區受損在預期性姿勢控制及動作選擇上扮演重要角色的證據。臨床上應針對這些缺損設計有效的治療方式。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: To investigate the influence of PMC lesion on human proactive postural control as well as the preparation and selection of lower extremity voluntary movement by comparing the performance on proactive postural control and voluntary movement during a rapid stepping task between patients with stroke and healthy adults. Methods: Six stroke patients with the premotor cortex involved (PMC+), seven patients with PMC spared (PMC-), and eight age- and sex-matched healthy adults participated in this study. The subjects were required to respond as quickly as possible with a rapid forward step when the go signal appeared on the screen under two conditions with different predictability level (simple reaction time (SRT) and choice reaction time (CRT)). The accuracy rate of the behavioral responses and reaction time (RT) were assessed to indicate the selection ability. The distribution of combined behavioral-EMG response patterns, the tibialis anterior muscle onset latency (TAOL) and postural-movement latency (TA-Movement latency, TA-Mov) of the stepping leg were analyzed to indicate preparation ability. Results and Discussion: No significant group main effect was found for the accuracy rate of the behavioral responses, but the RT of the PMC+ group was marginally longer than the healthy group (p = .059, effect size = .94). This result may indicate that the PMC+ group required longer time for selecting the appropriate stepping response. For movement-related postural preparation, the PMC+ and PMC- groups displayed significantly more TA delayed trials than the healthy adult group in the CRT condition (p = .007). The TAOL of the stance leg of the PMC+ group was significantly longer than that of the healthy controls while stepping with the unaffected leg (p = .040) and affected leg (p = .024). The TA-Mov showed no significant difference between groups regardless of the stepping legs. These results may suggest that the PMC lesion not only influenced the postural preparation of the affected stepping leg, but also that of the unaffected stance leg through a subcortical pathway. A hypothetical model is proposed to describe the involvement of the PMC in postural preparation and movement selection. Conclusions: This study provided evidence that lesion of the PMC affects the postural preparedness and selection of lower extremity voluntary movement. These findings can be used by clinicians to design effective interventions for improving postural preparedness and selection of voluntary movement for PMC involved patients. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-12T17:55:57Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-97-R93428010-1.pdf: 977455 bytes, checksum: 3a0c4b19d145ad15ac394406a99be17c (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 i
誌謝 ii 摘要 iv ABSTRACT vi LIST OF FIGURES xi LIST OF TABLES xii LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS xiii CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1 1.1. Research Background 1 1.2. Purpose 3 1.3. Terms and Definitions of Variables 4 1.3.1. Terms 4 1.3.2. Independent Variables 7 1.3.3. Dependent Variables 7 1.4. Research Questions and Hypotheses 8 1.5. Assumptions 14 CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW 15 2.1. Falls in Stroke 15 2.2. Proactive Postural Control and Reaction Time Associated to Stepping or walking 17 2.2.1. Proactive Postural Control and Reaction Time in Healthy Adults 17 2.2.2. Proactive Postural Control Deficits in Patients with Stroke 19 2.3. Brain Regions Related to Motor Control and Proactive Postural Control 19 2.4. The Role of Premotor Cortex in Motor Control and Proactive Postural Control 21 2.4.1. The Role of Premotor Cortex in Movement Preparation 21 2.4.2. The Role of Premotor Cortex in Movement Selection 23 2.5. Summary 24 CHAPTER 3: METHODS 26 3.1. Study Design 26 3.2. Subjects 26 3.3. Instrumentation 28 3.3.1. Clinical Assessment Instruments 28 3.3.2. Laboratory Instruments 31 3.4. Procedure 32 3.5. Data and Statistical Analysis 35 3.5.1. Data Analysis 35 3.5.2. Statistical Analysis 36 CHAPTER 4: RESULTS 42 4.1. Subjects 42 4.2. Accuracy Rate of the Behavioral Responses 43 4.3. Distribution of the Combined Behavioral-EMG Response Patterns 43 4.4. TA onset latency (TAOL) 44 4.5. Reaction Time (RT) 45 4.6. TA-Movement latency (TA-Mov) 46 CHAPTER 5: DISCUSSION 48 5.1. PMC Lesion Effect on Movement Selection 48 5.2. PMC Lesion Effect on Movement-related Postural Preparation 51 5.4. Limitations 53 5.5. Recommendations for Future Research 54 5.6. Clinical Implications 55 CHAPTER 6: CONCLUSIONS 56 REFERENCES 57 FIGURES 64 TABLES 73 APPENDICES 80 APPENDIX A: Approval Letter from the IRB of the NTUH 80 APPENDIX B: Subject Informed Consent 81 APPENDIX C: Subject Information Records for Patients with Stroke 86 APPENDIX D: Subject Information Records for Healthy Adults 88 APPENDIX E: The Lower Extremity Motor Subtests of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment 90 APPENDIX F: The Modified Ashworth Scale 93 APPENDIX G: The Line Bisection Test 94 APPENDIX H: The Mini-Mental State Examination 95 APPENDIX I: The Step Test 96 APPENDIX J: The Berg Balance Scale 97 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 前動作皮質區在中風病患執行快速向前跨步動作之預期性姿勢控制角色 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Roles of Premotor Cortex in Proactive Postural Control Associated with A Rapid Stepping Task in Patients with Stroke | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 96-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林光華,邱銘章,王堯弘,陳聖馨 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 中風,前動作皮質區,預期性姿勢控制,反應時間,動作選擇,跨步, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Stroke,Premotor cortex,Proactive postural control,Reaction time,Selection,Stepping, | en |
dc.relation.page | 98 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2008-02-01 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 醫學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 物理治療學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 物理治療學系所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-97-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 954.55 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。