請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/27075
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 林克忠 | |
dc.contributor.author | Hsiu-Wen Yang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 楊琇雯 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-12T17:54:56Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-10-07 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2011-10-07 | |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2011-08-09 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Altschuler, E. L., Wisdom, S. B., Stone, L., Foster, C., Galasko, D., Llewellyn, D. M., et al. (1999). Rehabilitation of hemiparesis after stroke with a mirror. Lancet, 353(9169), 2035-2036.
Baker, K., Cano, S. J., & Playford, E. D. (2011). Outcome measurement in stroke: a scale selection strategy. Stroke, 42(6), 1787-1794. Barak, S., & Duncan, P. W. (2006). Issues in selecting outcome measures to assess functional recovery after stroke. NeuroRx, 3(4), 505-524. Bohannon, R. W., & Smith, M. B. (1987). Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. Physical Therapy, 67(2), 206-207. Cardoso de Oliveira, S. (2002). The neuronal basis of bimanual coordination: recent neurophysiological evidence and functional models. Acta Psychologica, 110(2-3), 139-159. Carey, L., Macdonell, R., & Matyas, T. A. (2011). SENSe: Study of the Effectiveness of Neurorehabilitation on Sensation: a randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 25(4), 304-313. Carr, J. H., & Shepherd, R. B. (1999). Neurological rehabilitation: Optimizing motor performance. Oxford [u.a.]: Butterworth-Heinemann. Cattaneo, L., & Rizzolatti, G. (2009). The mirror neuron system. Arch Neurol, 66(5), 557-560. Cauraugh, J. H., & Summers, J. J. (2005). Neural plasticity and bilateral movements: A rehabilitation approach for chronic stroke. Prog Neurobiol, 75(5), 309-320. Celnik, P., Webster, B., Glasser, D. M., & Cohen, L. G. (2008). Effects of action observation on physical training after stroke. Stroke, 39(6), 1814-1820. Chan, B. L., Witt, R., Charrow, A. P., Magee, A., Howard, R., Pasquina, P. F., et al. (2007). Mirror therapy for phantom limb pain. N Engl J Med, 357(21), 2206-2207. Chen, J. C., Liang, C. C., & Shaw, F. Z. (2005). Facilitation of sensory and motor recovery by thermal intervention for the hemiplegic upper limb in acute stroke patients: a single-blind randomized clinical trial. Stroke, 36(12), 2665-2669. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd Edition): Routledge Academic. Desrosiers, J., Bravo, G., Hebert, R., Dutil, E., & Mercier, L. (1994). Validation of the Box and Block Test as a measure of dexterity of elderly people: reliability, validity, and norms studies. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 75(7), 751-755. Dohle, C., Pullen, J., Nakaten, A., Kust, J., Rietz, C., & Karbe, H. (2009). Mirror therapy promotes recovery from severe hemiparesis: a randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 23(3), 209-217. Duncan, P. W., Bode, R. K., Min Lai, S., & Perera, S. (2003). Rasch analysis of a new stroke-specific outcome scale: the Stroke Impact Scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 84(7), 950-963. Duncan, P. W., Propst, M., & Nelson, S. G. (1983). Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer assessment of sensorimotor recovery following cerebrovascular accident. Phys Ther, 63(10), 1606-1610. Duncan, P. W., Propst, M., & Nelson, S. G. (1983). Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Sensorimotor Recovery Following Cerebrovascular Accident. Physical Therapy, 63(10), 1606-1610. Ernst, E. (1990). A review of stroke rehabilitation and physiotherapy. Stroke, 21(7), 1081-1085. Ertelt, D., Small, S., Solodkin, A., Dettmers, C., McNamara, A., Binkofski, F., et al. (2007). Action observation has a positive impact on rehabilitation of motor deficits after stroke. Neuroimage, 36 Suppl 2, T164-173. Ezendam, D., Bongers, R. M., & Jannink, M. J. (2009). Systematic review of the effectiveness of mirror therapy in upper extremity function. Disabil Rehabil, 1-15. Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Pavesi, G., & Rizzolatti, G. (1995). Motor facilitation during action observation: a magnetic stimulation study. J Neurophysiol, 73(6), 2608-2611. Faria-Fortini, I., Michaelsen, S. M., Cassiano, J. G., & Teixeira-Salmela, L. F. (2011). Upper Extremity Function in Stroke Subjects: Relationships between the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health Domains. J Hand Ther. Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). 'Mini-mental state'. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res, 12(3), 189-198. Fredericks, C. M., & Saladin, L. K. (1996). Pathophysiology of the motor systems : principles and clinical presentations. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis. Fugl-Meyer, A. R., Jaasko, L., Leyman, I., Olsson, S., & Steglind, S. (1975). The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med, 7(1), 13-31. Gastaut, H. J., & Bert, J. (1954). EEG changes during cinematographic presentation; moving picture activation of the EEG. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 6(3), 433-444. Gladstone, D. J., Danells, C. J., & Black, S. E. (2002). The fugl-meyer assessment of motor recovery after stroke: a critical review of its measurement properties. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 16(3), 232-240. Hafsteinsdottir, T. B., Algra, A., Kappelle, L. J., & Grypdonck, M. H. (2005). Neurodevelopmental treatment after stroke: a comparative study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 76(6), 788-792. Hari, R., & Salmelin, R. (1997). Human cortical oscillations: a neuromagnetic view through the skull. Trends Neurosci, 20(1), 44-49. Hsieh, Y. W., Wu, C. Y., Liao, W. W., Lin, K. C., Wu, K. Y., & Lee, C. Y. (2011). Effects of Treatment Intensity in Upper Limb Robot-Assisted Therapy for Chronic Stroke: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. Iacoboni, M., & Mazziotta, J. C. (2007). Mirror neuron system: basic findings and clinical applications. Ann Neurol, 62(3), 213-218. Kwakkel, G., Kollen, B. J., van der Grond, J., & Prevo, A. J. (2003). Probability of regaining dexterity in the flaccid upper limb: impact of severity of paresis and time since onset in acute stroke. Stroke, 34(9), 2181-2186. Lincoln, N. B., Jackson, J. M., & Adams, S. A. (1998). Reliability and Revision of the Nottingham Sensory Assessment for Stroke Patients. Physiotherapy, 84(8), 358-365. Maihofner, C., Handwerker, H. O., Neundorfer, B., & Birklein, F. (2004). Cortical reorganization during recovery from complex regional pain syndrome. Neurology, 63(4), 693-701. Mathiowetz, V., Volland, G., Kashman, N., & Weber, K. (1985). Adult norms for the Box and Block Test of manual dexterity. Am J Occup Ther, 39(6), 386-391. Matthys, K., Smits, M., Van der Geest, J. N., Van der Lugt, A., Seurinck, R., Stam, H. J., et al. (2009). Mirror-induced visual illusion of hand movements: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 90(4), 675-681. McCabe, C. S., Haigh, R. C., Ring, E. F., Halligan, P. W., Wall, P. D., & Blake, D. R. (2003). A controlled pilot study of the utility of mirror visual feedback in the treatment of complex regional pain syndrome (type 1). Rheumatology (Oxford), 42(1), 97-101. McDowd, J. M., Filion, D. L., Pohl, P. S., Richards, L. G., & Stiers, W. (2003). Attentional abilities and functional outcomes following stroke. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci, 58(1), P45-53. Messier, S., Bourbonnais, D., Desrosiers, J., & Roy, Y. (2006). Kinematic analysis of upper limbs and trunk movement during bilateral movement after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 87(11), 1463-1470. Michaelsen, S. M., & Levin, M. F. (2004). Short-term effects of practice with trunk restraint on reaching movements in patients with chronic stroke - A controlled trial. Stroke, 35(8), 1914-1919. Michielsen, M. E., Selles, R. W., van der Geest, J. N., Eckhardt, M., Yavuzer, G., Stam, H. J., et al. (2011). Motor recovery and cortical reorganization after mirror therapy in chronic stroke patients: a phase II randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 25(3), 223-233. Mudie, M. H., & Matyas, T. A. (2000). Can simultaneous bilateral movement involve the undamaged hemisphere in reconstruction of neural networks damaged by stroke? Disabil Rehabil, 22(1-2), 23-37. Murphy, M. A., Willen, C., & Sunnerhagen, K. S. (2011). Kinematic variables quantifying upper-extremity performance after stroke during reaching and drinking from a glass. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 25(1), 71-80. Patuzzo, S., Fiaschi, A., & Manganotti, P. (2003). Modulation of motor cortex excitability in the left hemisphere during action observation: a single- and paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation study of self- and non-self-action observation. Neuropsychologia, 41(9), 1272-1278. Pedretti, L. W., Pendleton, H. M., & Schultz-Krohn, W. (2006). Pedretti's occupational therapy : practice skills for physical dysfunction. St. Louis, Mo.: Mosby/Elsevier. Penta, M., Tesio, L., Arnould, C., Zancan, A., & Thonnard, J. L. (2001). The ABILHAND questionnaire as a measure of manual ability in chronic stroke patients: Rasch-based validation and relationship to upper limb impairment. Stroke, 32(7), 1627-1634. Pollock, A., Baer, G., Langhorne, P., & Pomeroy, V. (2007). Physiotherapy treatment approaches for the recovery of postural control and lower limb function following stroke: a systematic review. Clinical Rehabilitation, 21(5), 395-410. Radomski, M. V., & Trombly Latham, C. A. (2008). Occupational therapy for physical dysfunction. Baltimore, MD [etc.]: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkens. Ramachandran, V. S., & Altschuler, E. L. (2009). The use of visual feedback, in particular mirror visual feedback, in restoring brain function. Brain, 132(Pt 7), 1693-1710. Ramachandran, V. S., & Altschuler, E. L. (2009). The use of visual feedback, in particular mirror visual feedback, in restoring brain function. Brain, 132(7), 1693-1710. Ramachandran, V. S., Rogers-Ramachandran, D., & Cobb, S. (1995). Touching the phantom limb. Nature, 377(6549), 489-490. Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annu Rev Neurosci, 27, 169-192. Rizzolatti, G., Fabbri-Destro, M., & Cattaneo, L. (2009). Mirror neurons and their clinical relevance. Nat Clin Pract Neurol, 5(1), 24-34. Roby-Brami, A., Feydy, A., Combeaud, M., Biryukova, E. V., Bussel, B., & Levin, M. F. (2003). Motor compensation and recovery for reaching in stroke patients. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, 107(5), 369-381. Rohrer, B., Fasoli, S., Krebs, H. I., Hughes, R., Volpe, B., Frontera, W. R., et al. (2002). Movement smoothness changes during stroke recovery. J Neurosci, 22(18), 8297-8304. Rothgangel, A. S., Braun, S. M., Beurskens, A. J., Seitz, R. J., & Wade, D. T. (2011). The clinical aspects of mirror therapy in rehabilitation: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Rehabil Res, 34(1), 1-13. Sanford, J., Moreland, J., Swanson, L. R., Stratford, P. W., & Gowland, C. (1993). Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer assessment for testing motor performance in patients following stroke. Physical Therapy, 73(7), 447-454. Schepers, V. P., Ketelaar, M., van de Port, I. G., Visser-Meily, J. M., & Lindeman, E. (2007). Comparing contents of functional outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Disabil Rehabil, 29(3), 221-230. Seidler, R. D., Noll, D. C., & Thiers, G. (2004). Feedforward and feedback processes in motor control. Neuroimage, 22(4), 1775-1783. Smania, N., Montagnana, B., Faccioli, S., Fiaschi, A., & Aglioti, S. M. (2003). Rehabilitation of somatic sensation and related deficit of motor control in patients with pure sensory stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 84(11), 1692-1702. Sommerfeld, D. K., & von Arbin, M. H. (2004). The impact of somatosensory function on activity performance and length of hospital stay in geriatric patients with stroke. Clin Rehabil, 18(2), 149-155. Stoykov, M. E., Lewis, G. N., & Corcos, D. M. (2009). Comparison of Bilateral and Unilateral Training for Upper Extremity Hemiparesis in Stroke. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 23(9), 945-953. Strafella, A. P., & Paus, T. (2000). Modulation of cortical excitability during action observation: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Neuroreport, 11(10), 2289-2292. Subramanian, S. K., Yamanaka, J., Chilingaryan, G., & Levin, M. F. (2010). Validity of movement pattern kinematics as measures of arm motor impairment poststroke. Stroke, 41(10), 2303-2308. Sutbeyaz, S., Yavuzer, G., Sezer, N., & Koseoglu, B. F. (2007). Mirror therapy enhances lower-extremity motor recovery and motor functioning after stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 88(5), 555-559. Tarnanen, S. P., Ylinen, J. J., Siekkinen, K. M., Malkia, E. A., Kautiainen, H. J., & Hakkinen, A. H. (2008). Effect of Isometric Upper-Extremity Exercises on the Activation of Core Stabilizing Muscles. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 89(3), 513-521. Taub, E., Uswatte, G., Mark, V. W., & Morris, D. M. (2006). The learned nonuse phenomenon: implications for rehabilitation. Eura Medicophys, 42(3), 241-256. Winward, C. E., Halligan, P. W., & Wade, D. T. (1999). Current practice and clinical relevance of somatosensory assessment after stroke. Clin Rehabil, 13(1), 48-55. World Health, O. (2001). ICF : International classification of functioning, disability and health / World Health Organization. Geneva :: World Health Organization. Wu, C. Y., Chen, C. L., Tang, S. F., Lin, K. C., & Huang, Y. Y. (2007). Kinematic and clinical analyses of upper-extremity movements after constraint-induced movement therapy in patients with stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 88(8), 964-970. Wu, C. Y., Chou, S. H., Chen, C. L., Kuo, M. Y., Lu, T. W., & Fu, Y. C. (2009). Kinematic analysis of a functional and sequential bimanual task in patients with left hemiparesis: intra-limb and interlimb coordination. Disabil Rehabil, 31(12), 958-966. Yavuzer, G., Selles, R., Sezer, N., Sutbeyaz, S., Bussmann, J. B., Koseoglu, F., et al. (2008). Mirror therapy improves hand function in subacute stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 89(3), 393-398. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/27075 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 背景:
中風後的半側偏癱以及感覺缺失常造成中風病患上肢動作缺失及生活失能的常見原因。半側偏癱外,習得廢用現象常出現於中風病患,呈現了日常生活中患側手的功能使用頻率與品質低落,並對中風後的復原帶來不利影響。臨床上常規使用的復健療法外,近年有諸多新興的神經復健療法,其中鏡像治療對中風患者的上肢動作再學習感覺復原的成效漸受重視且極需驗證。本研究使用隨機試驗探討鏡像治療方法對中風患者在各種功能面向的成效差異,以建立有效的動作復健方案。 方法: 本研究採取隨機對照試驗之方法,由北部醫院之復健部門募集24位同意參與實驗之慢性中風參與者,並隨機分派至鏡像治療 (n=12)以及等量傳統復健組 (n=12)。兩組受試者皆接受職能治療師所提供的等量治療介入,每天1.5小時,每週五天,共四週。在治療前後,利用臨床評估工具以及運動學分析評估受試之上肢感覺動作表現、生活功能及中風相關生活品質。 結果: 鏡像治療組相較於等量配對傳統復健組於治療後有較佳的感覺動作復原。在執行單手伸臂按鈴動作時,鏡像治療組表現出較流暢及準確的動作控制策略。劑量配對控制組相較於鏡像治療組於治療後則表現較佳的功能性能力。 討論: 鏡像治療法可改善慢性中風病患側上肢感覺動作復原能力及動作控制策略,使個案表現出流暢及準確的動作,並同時減少上肢代償動作。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Background:
The loss of upper extremity control and sensory deficits are common impairment after stroke. As a consequence of paresis, poor motor control and sensory dysfunction of affected upper extremity, “learned nonuse phenomenon” is often seen in stroke patients. Most of the traditional rehabilitations lack of evidences to exam the efficacy of motor recovery and sensory deficits on stroke patients. To date, an alternative intervention, mirror therapy (MT), which might have activation changes in the primary motor cortex with somatosensory input has been getting much attention in stroke rehabilitation recently. The study investigated the effects of MT on sensorimotor recovery, functional abilities and motor strategy compared with dose-match control intervention (CI). Methods: The design of this study was randomized pretest and posttest control trial. Participants were individually randomized to MT (n=12) or CI group (n=12).The clinical measures at pre-treatment and post-treatment were evaluated by a certified rater who was trained before performed the evaluation of clinical measures. The 24 participants were recruited, screened, enrolled and randomized from the rehabilitation department of participating hospitals in Taiwan. Both group received intensive training for 1.5 hours/day, 5 days/week, for 4 weeks. The clinical and kinematic measures were administered before and after the 4-weeks intervention immediately. Results: The MT group showed better improvement in sensorimotor recovery compared with CI. Additionally, MT group also showed the smoother and accuracy movement with less compensatory pattern during unilateral task rather than bilateral task. However, the patents in the CI group showed the better improvement on bimanual function and manual dexterity. Conclusions: The study provides the evidence that MT could lead to better sensorimotor recovery and motor control of affected upper extremity in chronic stroke patients rather than functional abilities. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-12T17:54:56Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-100-R98429007-1.pdf: 2504841 bytes, checksum: 59e6492c16424e898bb6a59bb2fa31a1 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | Contents
口試委員審定書 i 誌謝 ii 中文摘要 iii ABSTRACT iv Contents vi LIST OF TABLES viii LIST OF FIGURES ix Introduction 1 Chapter 1 Literature Review 3 1.1 Mirror Therapy 3 1.2 Possible Mechanisms of Mirror Therapy 4 1.2.1 Mirror Visual Feedback (MVF) 4 1.2.2 Bilateral Symmetrical Movements 5 1.2.3 Mirror Neuron System (MNS) 5 1.3 Study Objectives 6 1.4 Study Hypothesis 8 Chapter 2 Methods 9 2.1 Study design 9 2.2 Participants 9 2.3 Intervention 10 2.3.1 Mirror Therapy 11 2.3.2 Control Intervention 11 2.4 Outcome Measures 12 2.4.1 Clinical Measures 12 2.4.2 Kinematic Measures 16 2.5 Statistical Analysis 18 Chapter 3 Results 20 3.1 Baseline Characteristics of Participants 20 3.2 Clinical Outcome Measures 20 3.3 Kinematic Outcome Measures 22 3.3.1 Unilateral task 22 3.3.2 Bilateral task 22 Chapter 4 Discussion 24 4.1 Clinical Outcomes 24 4.2 Kinematic Outcomes 27 4.3 Implication of the Study 29 4.4 Study Limitations and Future Studies 30 4.5 Conclusions 31 Reference 32 Appendix 67 LIST OF TABLES Table 1 Baseline characteristics of study participants - 42 - Table 2 Descriptive and Inferential Statistics for Primary Outcome Measures from Pretreatment to Posttreatment - 43 - Table 3 Descriptive and Inferential Statistics for secondary Outcome Measures from Pretreatment to Posttreatment - 44 - Table 4 Descriptive and Inferential Statistics for Analysis of Unilateral Reaching with Restraint Kinematic Task - 45 - Table 5 Descriptive and Inferential Statistics for Analysis of Bilateral Reaching with Restraint Kinematic Task - 46 - LIST OF FIGURES Fig 1 Flow diagram of study participants - 47 - Fig 2 A well-designed mirror box - 48 - Fig 3 Repetitive simple movements in the mirror box - 49 - Fig 4 Goal-directed movements in the mirror box - 50 - Fig 5 Marker set - 51 - Fig 6 Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) from Pretreatment to Posttreatment Group Mean and - 58 - Fig 7 Revised Nottingham Sensory Assessment (RNSA) from Pretreatment to Posttreatment Group Mean and Standard Errors - 61 - Fig 8 ABILHAND and Box and Block Test (BBT) from Pretreatment to Posttreatment Group - 62 - Fig 9 Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) from Pretreatment to Posttreatment Group Mean and Standard - 64 - Fig 10 Kinematic Variables for the Unilateral Task from Pretreatment to Posttreatment Group Mean and Standard Errors - 65 - Fig 11 Kinematic variables for the bilateral task from pretreatment to posttreatment Group Mean and Standard Errors - 66 - | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 鏡像治療與等量傳統復健於慢性中風個案之對比試驗 | zh_TW |
dc.title | A Comparative Efficacy Study of Mirror Therapy and Dose-Matched Control Intervention in Patients with Chronic Stroke | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 99-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 吳菁宜,陳嘉玲 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 鏡像治療,中風復健,上肢,感覺動作,動作控制, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Mirror therapy, Stroke rehabilitation,Upper extremity,Sensorimotor,Motor control, | en |
dc.relation.page | 68 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2011-08-09 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 醫學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 職能治療研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 職能治療學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-100-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 2.45 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。