請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/26974完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 葉力森(Lih-Seng Yeh) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Po-Yen Chou | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 周柏諺 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-12T17:53:04Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2008-04-01 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2008-04-01 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2008 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2008-03-28 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 第一章 第二章
1. Durham H. Anteversion of the femoral neck in the normal femur and its relation to congenital dislocation of the hip J AM Med Assn 1915;65:2. 2. Riser WH, Shirer JF. Hip dysplasia: coxafemoral abnormalities in neonatal German Shepherd dogs. J Small Anim Pract 1966;7:7-12. 3. Kingsley PC, Olmsted KL. A study to determine the angle of anteversion of the neck of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg 1948;30-A:7. 4. Nunamaker DM, Biery DN, D. NC. Femoral neck anteversion in the dog: Its Radiographic measurement. J American Vet Radiol Soc 1973;14:3. 5. Chevrot A. [A simplified radiological technique for measurement of the angle of anteversion of the femur and of the cervico-diaphyseal angle (author's transl)]. J Radiol Electrol Med Nucl 1976;57:545-548. 6. Moulton A, Upadhyay SS. A direct method of measuring femoral anteversion using ultrasound. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1982;64:469-472. 7. Hernandez RJ, Tachdjian MO, Poznanski AK, et al. CT determination of femoral torsion. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1981;137:97-101. 8. Murphy SB, Simon SR, Kijewski PK, et al. Femoral anteversion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1987;69:1169-1176. 9. Budin E, Chandler E. Measurement of femoral neck anteversion by a direct method. Radiology 1957;69:209-213. 10. Berman L, Mitchell R, Katz D. Ultrasound assessment of femoral anteversion. A comparison with computerised tomography. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1987;69:268-270. 11. Madsen JS, Svalastoga E. Inclination and anteversion of collum femoris in hip dysplasia and coxarthritis. Acta Vet Scand 1994;35:115-119. 12. Sangavi SM, Szoke G, Murray DW, et al. Femoral remodelling after subtrochanteric osteotomy for developmental dysplasia of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1996;78:917-923. 13. Alonso CG, Curiel MD, Carranza FH, et al. Femoral bone mineral density, neck-shaft angle and mean femoral neck width as predictors of hip fracture in men and women. Multicenter Project for Research in Osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 2000;11:714-720. 14. Hauptman J, Cardinet GH, 3rd, Morgan JP, et al. Angles of inclination and anteversion in hip dysplasia in the dog. Am J Vet Res 1985;46:2033-2036. 15. Rumph PF, Hathcock JT. A symmetric axis-based method for measuring the projected femoral angle of inclination in dogs. Vet Surg 1990;19:328-333. 16. Montavon PM, Hohn RB, Olmstead ML, et al. Inclination and anteversion angles of the femoral head and neck in the dog. Evaluation of a Standard Method of measurement. Vet Surg 1985;14:5. 17. Muckle DS. Femoral neck fractures and hip joint injuries. 1977:10. 18. Evans HE. Miller's anatomy of the dog, 3 ed. Philadelphia: W.B.Saunders Co.; 1993;349-380. 19. Clark JM, Freeman MA, Witham D. The relationship of neck orientation to the shape of the proximal femur. J Arthroplasty 1987;2:99-109. 20. Bardet JL, Ruby RL, Hohn RB. Measurement of femoral torsion in dogs using a biplanar method. Vet Surg 1983;12:1-6. 21. Dunlap K, Shands AR, Jr., Hollister LC, Jr., et al. A new method for determination of torsion of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1953;35-A:289-311. 22. Weiner DS, Cook AJ, Hoyt WA, Jr., et al. Computed tomography in the measurement of femoral anteversion. Orthopedics 1978;1:299-306. 23. Dunn DM. Anteversion of the neck of the femur; a method of measurement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1952;34-B:181-186. 24. Ginja MM, Gonzalo-Orden JM, Jesus SS, et al. Measurement of the femoral neck anteversion angle in the dog using computed tomography. Vet J 2006. 25. Kaiser S, Cornely D, Golder W, et al. The correlation of canine patellar luxation and the anteversion angle as measured using magnetic resonance images. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2001;42:113-118. 26. Ruby L, Mital MA, O'Connor J, et al. Anteversion of the femoral neck. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1979;61:46-51. 27. Johnston RC, Brand RA, Crowninshield RD. Reconstruction of the hip. A mathematical approach to determine optimum geometric relationships. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1979;61:639-652. 28. Murray DW. The definition and measurement of acetabular orientation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1993;75:228-232. 29. Prieur WD. Coxarthrosis in the dog. Normal and abnormal biomechanics of the hip joint. Vet Surg 1980;9:5. 30. Heimkes B, Posel P, Plitz W, et al. [Age-related force distribution at the proximal end of the femur in normally growing children]. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 1997;135:17-23. 31. Lekamwasam S, Lenora J. Age-related trends in hip geometry in Sri Lankan women: a cross-sectional study. J Bone Miner Metab 2007;25:431-435. 32. Hulse DA. Pathophysiology and management of medial patellar luxation in the dog. Vet Med Small Anim Clin 1981;76:43-51. 33. Upadhyay SS, Moulton A, Burwell RG. Biological factors predisposing to traumatic posterior dislocation of the hip. A selection process in the mechanism of injury. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1985;67:232-236. 34. Reikeras O, Hoiseth A. Femoral neck angles in osteoarthritis of the hip. Acta Orthop Scand 1982;53:781-784. 35. Beck M, Kalhor M, Leunig M, et al. Hip morphology influences the pattern of damage to the acetabular cartilage: femoroacetabular impingement as a cause of early osteoarthritis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005;87:1012-1018. 36. Giori NJ, Trousdale RT. Acetabular retroversion is associated with osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003:263-269. 37. Bobroff ED, Chambers HG, Sartoris DJ, et al. Femoral anteversion and neck-shaft angle in children with cerebral palsy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1999:194-204. 38. Banfield CM, Bartels JE, Hudson JA, et al. A retrospective study of canine hip dysplasia in 116 military working dogs. Part I: Angle measurements and orthopedic foundation for animals (OFA) grading. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1996;32:413-422. 39. Pulkkinen P, Partanen J, Jalovaara P, et al. Combination of bone mineral density and upper femur geometry improves the prediction of hip fracture. Osteoporos Int 2004;15:274-280. 40. Szulc P. Bone density, geometry, and fracture in elderly men. Curr Osteoporos Rep 2006;4:57-63. 41. Brownbill RA, Ilich JZ. Hip geometry and its role in fracture: what do we know so far? Curr Osteoporos Rep 2003;1:25-31. 42. Pulkkinen P, Eckstein F, Lochmuller EM, et al. Association of geometric factors and failure load level with the distribution of cervical vs. trochanteric hip fractures. J Bone Miner Res 2006;21:895-901. 43. Partanen J, Jamsa T, Jalovaara P. Influence of the upper femur and pelvic geometry on the risk and type of hip fractures. J Bone Miner Res 2001;16:1540-1546. 44. Suda H, Hattori T, Iwata H. Varus derotation osteotomy for persistent dysplasia in congenital dislocation of the hip. Proximal femoral growth and alignment changes in the leg. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1995;77:756-761. 45. Mills HJ, Horne JG, Purdie GL. The relationship between proximal femoral anatomy and osteoarthrosis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1993:205-208. 46. Tomlinson J, Fox D, Cook JL, et al. Measurement of femoral angles in four dog breeds. Vet Surg 2007;36:593-598. 47. Hoffer MM, Stein GA, Koffman M, et al. Femoral varus-derotation osteotomy in spastic cerebral palsy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1985;67:1229-1235. 48. Sarierler M. Comparison of femoral inclination angle measurements in dysplastic and nondysplastic dogs of different breeds. Acta Vet Hung 2004;52:245-252. 49. Towle HA, Griffon DJ, Thomas MW, et al. Pre- and postoperative radiographic and computed tomographic evaluation of dogs with medial patellar luxation. Vet Surg 2005;34:265-272. 50. Vanhoutte JJ, Raeside DE. A generalization of Chevrot's method for determining anteversion and cervico-diaphyseal angles. Radiology 1978;128:251-252. 51. Magilligan DJ. Calculation of the angle of anteversion by means of horizontal lateral roentgenography. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1956;38-A:1231-1246. 52. Soutter R, Bradford E. Twists in normal and in congenitally dislocated femora. New York Med J 1903;78:7. 53. Parsons FG. The Characters of the English Thigh-Bone: Part II: The Difficulty of Sexing. J Anat Physiol 1915;49:345-361. 54. Pick JW, Stack JK, Anson BJ. Measurement of the human femur. I. Length, Diameters and Angles. Quart Bull Northwestern Univ Med Sch 1941;15:10. 55. Dudley RM, Kowaleski MP, Drost WT, et al. Radiographic and computed tomographic determination of femoral varus and torsion in the dog. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2006;47:546-552. 56. Lausten GS, Jorgensen F, Boesen J. Measurement of anteversion of the femoral neck. Ultrasound and computerised tomography compared. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1989;71:237-239. 57. Roger SP. A method for determining the angle of torsion of the neck of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1931;13:4. 58. Ryder CT, Crane L. Measuring femoral anteversion; the problem and a method. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1953;35-A:321-328. 59. Ogata K, Goldsand EM. A simple biplanar method of measuring femoral anteversion and neck-shaft angle. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1979;61:846-851. 60. Proubasta IR, Lluch AL, Roig JL, et al. A new method of measuring the femoral anteversion and neck-shaft angles. Clin Radiol 1984;35:323-326. 61. Iwamoto M, Basmajian JV, Strom CH. A method for determining femoral neck-shaft and anteversion angles. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1972;53:253-260. 62. Kuo TY, Skedros JG, Bloebaum RD. Measurement of femoral anteversion by biplane radiography and computed tomography imaging: comparison with an anatomic reference. Invest Radiol 2003;38:221-229. 63. Palierne S, Asimus E, Mathon D, et al. Geometric analysis of the proximal femur in a diverse sample of dogs. Res Vet Sci 2006;80:243-252. 64. Burr DB, Cook LT, Martin NL, et al. Measurement accuracy of proximal femoral geometry using biplanar radiography. J Pediatr Orthop 1981;1:171-179. 65. Beck KA, Erb HN, Tapley K. Effect of sagittal plane positioning errors on measurement of the angle of inclination in dogs. Vet Surg 1992;21:332-336. 66. Sugano N, Noble PC, Kamaric E. A comparison of alternative methods of measuring femoral anteversion. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1998;22:610-614. 67. Hoiseth A, Reikeras O, Fonstelien E. Aspects of femoral neck anteversion. Theoretical considerations and experimental results. Acta Radiol 1988;29:689-694. 68. Jaarsma RL, Bruggeman AW, Pakvis DF, et al. Computed tomography determined femoral torsion is not accurate. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2004;124:552-554. 69. Hermann KL, Egund N. CT measurement of anteversion in the femoral neck. The influence of femur positioning. Acta Radiol 1997;38:527-532. 70. Hoiseth A, Reikeras O, Fonstelien E. Evaluation of three methods for measurement of femoral neck anteversion. Femoral neck anteversion, definition, measuring methods and errors. Acta Radiol 1989;30:69-73. 71. Miller F, Merlo M, Liang Y, et al. Femoral version and neck shaft angle. J Pediatr Orthop 1993;13:382-388. 72. Abel MF, Sutherland DH, Wenger DR, et al. Evaluation of CT scans and 3-D reformatted images for quantitative assessment of the hip. J Pediatr Orthop 1994;14:48-53. 73. Tomczak RJ, Guenther KP, Rieber A, et al. MR imaging measurement of the femoral antetorsional angle as a new technique: comparison with CT in children and adults. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997;168:791-794. 74. Tomczak R, Gunther K, Pfeifer T, et al. [The measurement of the femoral torsion angle in children by NMR tomography compared to CT and ultrasound]. Rofo 1995;162:224-228. 75. Hauptman J, Prieur WD, Butler HC, et al. The angle of inclination of the canine femoral head and neck. Vet Surg 1979:4. 76. Miller F, Liang Y, Merlo M, et al. Measuring anteversion and femoral neck-shaft angle in cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol 1997;39:113-118. 77. Kay RM, Jaki KA, Skaggs DL. The effect of femoral rotation on the projected femoral neck-shaft angle. J Pediatr Orthop 2000;20:736-739. 78. Kuo TY, Skedros JG, Bloebaum RD. Comparison of human, primate, and canine femora: implications for biomaterials testing in total hip replacement. J Biomed Mater Res 1998;40:475-489. 79. Sugiyama S, Fujiwara K. Comparative morphometry of coxal joint angles. Exp Anim 1997;46:269-277. 80. Weiner LS, Kelley MA, Ulin RI, et al. Development of the acetabulum and hip: computed tomography analysis of the axial plane. J Pediatr Orthop 1993;13:421-425. 81. Wiberg G. Studies on Dysplastic Acetabula and Congenital Subluxation of the Hip Joint. . Acta Chir Scand Suppl 1939;83:1-130. 82. Kapatkin AS, Fordyce HH, Mayhew PD, et al. Canine Hip dysplasia: the disease and its diagnosis. Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet 2002;24:12. 83. Tomlinson JL, Johnson JC. Quantification of measurement of femoral head coverage and Norberg angle within and among four breeds of dogs. Am J Vet Res 2000;61:1492-1500. 84. Delaunay S, Dussault RG, Kaplan PA, et al. Radiographic measurements of dysplastic adult hips. Skeletal Radiol 1997;26:75-81. 85. Murphy SB, Ganz R, Muller ME. The prognosis in untreated dysplasia of the hip. A study of radiographic factors that predict the outcome. The Journal of bone and joint surgery American volume 1995;77:985-989. 86. Chosa E, Tajima N. Anterior acetabular head index of the hip on false-profile views. New index of anterior acetabular cover. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2003;85:826-829. 第三章 1. Dunlap K, Shands AR, Jr., Hollister LC, Jr., et al. A new method for determination of torsion of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1953;35-A:289-311. 2. Dudley RM, Kowaleski MP, Drost WT, et al. Radiographic and computed tomographic determination of femoral varus and torsion in the dog. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2006;47:546-552. 3. Bardet JL, Ruby RL, Hohn RB. Measurement of femoral torsion in dogs using a biplanar method. Vet Surg 1983;12:1-6. 4. Montavon PM, Hohn RB, Olmstead ML, et al. Inclination and anteversion angles of the femoral head and neck in the dog. Evaluation of a Standard Method of measurement. Vet Surg 1985;14:5. 5. Pulkkinen P, Eckstein F, Lochmuller EM, et al. Association of geometric factors and failure load level with the distribution of cervical vs. trochanteric hip fractures. J Bone Miner Res 2006;21:895-901. 6. Dunn DM. Anteversion of the neck of the femur; a method of measurement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1952;34-B:181-186. 7. Argenson JN, Ryembault E, Flecher X, et al. Three-dimensional anatomy of the hip in osteoarthritis after developmental dysplasia. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005;87:1192-1196. 8. Nunamaker DM, Biery DN, D. NC. Femoral neck anteversion in the dog: Its Radiographic measurement. J Am Vet Rad Soc 1973;14:3. 9. Hauptman J, Cardinet GH, 3rd, Morgan JP, et al. Angles of inclination and anteversion in hip dysplasia in the dog. Am J Vet Res 1985;46:2033-2036. 10. Hulse DA. Pathophysiology and management of medial patellar luxation in the dog. Vet Med Small Anim Clin 1981;76:43-51. 11. Kaiser S, Cornely D, Golder W, et al. The correlation of canine patellar luxation and the anteversion angle as measured using magnetic resonance images. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2001;42:113-118. 12. Towle HA, Griffon DJ, Thomas MW, et al. Pre- and postoperative radiographic and computed tomographic evaluation of dogs with medial patellar luxation. Vet Surg 2005;34:265-272. 13. Kingsley PC, Olmsted KL. A study to determine the angle of anteversion of the neck of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg 1948;30-A:7. 14. Roger SP. A method for determining the angle of torsion of the neck of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1931;13:4. 15. Budin E, Chandler E. Measurement of femoral neck anteversion by a direct method. Radiology 1957;69:209-213. 16. Chevrot A. [A simplified radiological technique for measurement of the angle of anteversion of the femur and of the cervico-diaphyseal angle (author's transl)]. J Radiol Electrol Med Nucl 1976;57:545-548. 17. Moulton A, Upadhyay SS. A direct method of measuring femoral anteversion using ultrasound. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1982;64:469-472. 18. Weiner DS, Cook AJ, Hoyt WA, Jr., et al. Computed tomography in the measurement of femoral anteversion. Orthopedics 1978;1:299-306. 19. Tomczak R, Gunther K, Pfeifer T, et al. [The measurement of the femoral torsion angle in children by NMR tomography compared to CT and ultrasound]. Rofo 1995;162:224-228. 20. Palierne S, Asimus E, Mathon D, et al. Geometric analysis of the proximal femur in a diverse sample of dogs. Res Vet Sci 2006;80:243-252. 21. Riser WH, Shirer JF. Hip dysplasia: coxafemoral abnormalities in neonatal German Shepherd dogs. J Small Anim Pract 1966;7:7-12. 22. Tomlinson J, Fox D, Cook JL, et al. Measurement of femoral angles in four dog breeds. Vet Surg 2007;36:593-598. 23. Abel MF, Sutherland DH, Wenger DR, et al. Evaluation of CT scans and 3-D reformatted images for quantitative assessment of the hip. J Pediatr Orthop 1994;14:48-53. 24. Davids JR, Marshall AD, Blocker ER, et al. Femoral anteversion in children with cerebral palsy. Assessment with two and three-dimensional computed tomography scans. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003;85-A:481-488. 25. Sugano N, Noble PC, Kamaric E. A comparison of alternative methods of measuring femoral anteversion. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1998;22:610-614. 26. Walker PS, Schneeweis D, Murphy S, et al. Strains and micromotions of press-fit femoral stem prostheses. J Biomech 1987;20:693-702. 27. Page A, Jasty M, Bragdon C, et al. Alterations in femoral and acetabular bone strains immediately following cementless total hip arthroplasty: an in vitro canine study. J Orthop Res 1991;9:738-748. 第四章 1. Sangavi SM, Szoke G, Murray DW, et al. Femoral remodelling after subtrochanteric osteotomy for developmental dysplasia of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1996;78:917-923. 2. Suda H, Hattori T, Iwata H. Varus derotation osteotomy for persistent dysplasia in congenital dislocation of the hip. Proximal femoral growth and alignment changes in the leg. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1995;77:756-761. 3. Alonso CG, Curiel MD, Carranza FH, et al. Femoral bone mineral density, neck-shaft angle and mean femoral neck width as predictors of hip fracture in men and women. Multicenter Project for Research in Osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 2000;11:714-720. 4. Brownbill RA, Ilich JZ. Hip geometry and its role in fracture: what do we know so far? Curr Osteoporos Rep 2003;1:25-31. 5. Kuo TY, Skedros JG, Bloebaum RD. Comparison of human, primate, and canine femora: implications for biomaterials testing in total hip replacement. J Biomed Mater Res 1998;40:475-489. 6. Hauptman J, Prieur WD, Butler HC, et al. The angle of inclination of the canine femoral head and neck. Vet Surg 1979:4. 7. Montavon PM, Hohn RB, Olmstead ML, et al. Inclination and anteversion angles of the femoral head and neck in the dog. Evaluation of a Standard Method of measurement. Vet Surg 1985;14:5. 8. Rumph PF, Hathcock JT. A symmetric axis-based method for measuring the projected femoral angle of inclination in dogs. Vet Surg 1990;19:328-333. 9. Dunn DM. Anteversion of the neck of the femur; a method of measurement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1952;34-B:181-186. 10. Dunlap K, Shands AR, Jr., Hollister LC, Jr., et al. A new method for determination of torsion of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1953;35-A:289-311. 11. Kay RM, Jaki KA, Skaggs DL. The effect of femoral rotation on the projected femoral neck-shaft angle. J Pediatr Orthop 2000;20:736-739. 12. Madsen JS, Svalastoga E. Inclination and anteversion of collum femoris in hip dysplasia and coxarthritis. Acta Vet Scand 1994;35:115-119. 13. Garry SC, Jhangri GS, Lambert RG. Femoral neck radiography: effect of flexion on visualization. Can Assoc Radiol J 2005;56:155-162. 14. Ogata K, Goldsand EM. A simple biplanar method of measuring femoral anteversion and neck-shaft angle. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1979;61:846-851. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/26974 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 主題一:股骨前傾角的量測:三維電腦斷層掃描下三種方法的比較
過去的文獻中有許多量測股骨前傾角的方法。三維的電腦斷層掃描曾經在許多的研究中使用,在這個主題中,我們利用三維電腦斷層掃描模擬並評估三種傳統的量測股骨前傾角之方法。共有18隻家犬,包括8隻黃金獵犬與10隻拉不拉多犬接受檢查,這些犬隻在檢查前都已經接受臨床與放射線學的檢查以確定其沒有任何的骨科學疾病。取得電腦斷層掃描影像以後,利用軟體重組後分別進行模擬的解剖法、單向x光法與雙向x光法的檢查。總共有三十六個股骨接受檢查,模擬解剖法、單向x光法與雙向x光法所得之平均前傾角分別為24.00°±4.03°, 36.37°±5.23° 與 32.52°±3.34°。在這三種方法中,觀察者間與觀察者內的誤差均不具顯著差異。然而,以不同方法的量測所得的結果,卻具有顯著差異。本研究顯示利用三維電腦斷層掃描量測股骨前傾角應是可行的,但是利用不同方法所定義的不同解剖軸線,將有可能會獲得顯著不同的結果,因此,建議研究者應該要小心解讀不同方法所得的結果。 主題二:股骨頸幹角的量測:四種anterior-postriorx光照射下的量測方法之應用 因與許多髖關節疾病之預後有關,股骨頸幹角在臨床上顯得相當重要,在人的頸幹角測量中,最常使用的方法是以主觀的直接目測法取得股骨頸與股骨幹的軸線,本研究的目的是評估四種獸醫的量測頸幹角之方法在人類股骨之應用,並且與直接目測法比較。共有15位志願者接受檢查。所有的志願者都在臨床上與放射線學下不具有任何的關節疾病,將股骨以15°內轉以後照射Anterior-Posterior的x光片,利用所提出之四種方法計算股骨的頸幹角並且與直接目測法互相比較。結果發現,而這五種方法的觀察者內之可靠度均佳。本研究中所提出的方法,在人醫臨床上均可以使用,但是,每個方法都有其不同的特色與缺點,在量測時,必須要根據病患不同的疾病去選擇方法。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Topic 1: Measurement of canine femoral neck anteversion: a comparison of 3 methods under three-dimensional computed tomography
Various methods measuring canine femoral neck anteversion have been proposed in literatures. In this article, 3 conventional methods under computed tomography simulation were evaluated. 18 client-owned dogs, including 8 Golden retrievers and 10 Labrador retrievers clinically and radiologically free of orthopedic diseases were examined. 16-slices computed tomographic images were obtained from all dogs and analyzed on a desktop computer. Simulated anatomic, axial radiographic, and biplanar radiographic methods were used for the measurement of femoral anteversion. A total of 36 femurs were examined, the average femoral anteversion obtained by simulated anatomic, axial radiography and biplanar radiography methods were 24.00°±4.03°, 36.37°±5.23° and 32.52°±3.34°, respectively. No significant difference was detected within and between observers in each method. However, significant differences among different methods were found (p<0.05). The study suggested that the measurement of femoral neck anteversion using any of the conventional methods under three-dimensional computed tomography simulation is feasible in the dog. However, results from different methods must be interpretated cautiously. Topic 2: The comparative study of 4 veterinary methods in the measurement of human femoral inclination Femoral inclination is clinically important for its relationship to the prognosis of various hip joint diseases. In the measurement of human inclination angle, subjective visual recognition of femoral neck and shaft axis was regularly used. The purpose of this study is to evaluate 4 methods developed in veterinary medicine in the measurement of human femoral inclination and to compare them with the conventional direct visual method. 15 volunteers were examined in this study. The subjects were all clinically and radiologically free of orthopedic diseases. Anterior-posterior radiographs were taken with the femur under 15° internal rotations. Femoral inclination was calculated using direct visual measurement and the result was compared with 4 techniques modified from veterinary studies. Intra-observer reliability was good in all 5 methods. The results of this study showned that the methods proposed in veterinary studies may be used in human clinical settings. However; each method has its inherited features and disadvantages, the selection of method still depends on the nature of patient conditions. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-12T17:53:04Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-97-R93629026-1.pdf: 13771613 bytes, checksum: 9f2d2f536127d7393b59ec7f34d10384 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 目 錄 I
表 次 III 圖 次 IV 中文摘要 VI 英文摘要 VIII 第 1 章 序言 1 第 2 章 文獻探討 2 第 1 節 股骨頸角度的定義 2 1. 近端股骨的解剖構造 2 2. 股骨量測軸線與股骨頸角度的定義 3 3. 前傾角與頸幹角的定義 4 第 2 節 股骨近端力學、發育與股骨近端角度臨床意義 6 1. 股骨近端的力學與發育 6 2. 股骨頸角度的臨床意義 9 第 3 節 前傾角的量測方式,信度與正常值 14 1. 直接量測法 15 2. 模擬解剖量測的X光透視法(直接法) 18 3. X光三角函數法(間接法) 23 4. 利用斷層掃描(Computed Tomography, CT)測量 30 5. 利用MRI測量 39 6. 利用超音波測量 40 7. 解剖軸線定義對前傾角量測結果的影響 42 第 4 節 頸幹角的量測方式、信度與正常值 43 1. 解剖學的研究 43 2. 放射線學的研究 43 3. CT的檢查 52 第 5 節 其他髖關節相關量測之數值 53 1. 比較解剖學 53 2. 髀臼關節窩的量測 57 第 6 節 參考文獻 64 第 3 章 股骨前傾角的量測:三維電腦斷層掃描下三種方法的比較 69 Measurement of canine femoral neck anteversion: a comparison of 3 methods under three-dimensional computed tomography 69 Abstract 71 Introduction 73 Materials and methods 75 Results 81 Discussion 83 Reference: 87 第 4 章 股骨頸幹角的測量:在anterior-posteriorx光下四種方法的應用與比較……............ 90 The comparative study of 4 veterinary methods in the measurement of human femoral inclination 90 Abstract 91 Introduction 92 Materials and Methods 94 Results 100 Discussion 102 Reference 105 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 放射線學 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 股骨前傾角 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 電腦斷層掃描 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 狗 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 股骨頸幹角 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 人 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | femoral inclination | en |
| dc.subject | radiology | en |
| dc.subject | human | en |
| dc.subject | femoral anteversion | en |
| dc.subject | dog | en |
| dc.subject | computed tomography | en |
| dc.title | 近端股骨量測比較方法學之研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The methodology of proximal femoral geometry measurement - a comparative study | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 96-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 侯勝茂(Sheng-Mou Hou),林中天(Chung-Tien Lin) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 股骨前傾角,電腦斷層掃描,狗,股骨頸幹角,人,放射線學, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | femoral anteversion,computed tomography,dog,femoral inclination,human,radiology, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 106 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2008-03-28 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 獸醫學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 獸醫學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-97-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 13.45 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
