請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/26933
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 湯明哲(Ming-Je Tang) | |
dc.contributor.author | YI-JU LO | en |
dc.contributor.author | 羅憶如 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T07:33:07Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2008-06-24 | |
dc.date.issued | 2008 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2008-06-17 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Anand, B. N. & Galetovic, A. 2000, Information, nonexcludability, and financial market structure. Journal of Business, 73: 357–402.
Bain, J. 1956. Barriers to New Competition. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press. Baum, J. C., & Ingram, P. 2002. Interorganizational learning and network organization: toward a behavioral theory of the interfirm. In M. Augier & J.G. March (Eds.), The Economics of Choice, Change, and Organization: Essays in memory of Richard M. Cyert:191-218. Edward Elgar: Cheltenham. Baum, J. C., Shipilov, A. V., & Rowley, T. J. 2003. Where do small worlds come from?. Industrial and Corporate Change, 12: 697-725. Blau, P. 1977. Inequality and Heterogeneity. The Free Press: New York. Boeker, W., Goodstein, J., Stephan, J., & Murmann, J. P. 1997. Competition in a multimarket environment. Organization Science, 8: 126-142. Borgatti, S. P., & Everett, M. G. 1992. Notions of position in social network analysis. Sociological Methodology, 22:1-35. Brock, W. A., & Schienkman, J. A. 1985. Price setting supergames with capacity constraints. Review of Economic Studies, 52: 371-382. Burt, R. 1992. Structural Hole. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA. Camic, C. 1992. Reputation and the predecessor selection: Parsons and the institutionalists. American Sociological Review, 57: 421-445. Chamberlin, E. 1929. Duopoly: Value where sellers are few. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 44: 63-100. Chung, S., Singh, H., & Lee, K. 2000. Complementarity, status similarity and social capital as drivers of alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal, 21: 1-22. Coleman, J. S. 1988. Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94: 95-120. Cool, K., & Dlerlckx, I. 1993. Rivalry, Strategic Groups and Firm Profitability. Strategic Management Journal, 14: 47-59. Dranove D., Peteraf M., & Shanley M. 1998. Do Strategic Groups Exist? An Economic Framework For Analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 19: 1029-1044. Davidson, C., & Deneckere, R. 1990. Excess capacity and collusion. International Economic Review, 31: 521-541. Deneckere, R. 1983. Duopoly supergames with product differentiation. Economics Letters, 11: 37-42. Dore, R. 1983. Goodwill and the spirit of market capitalism. British Journal of Sociology, 34: 459-482. Feuerstein, S. 2005. Collusion in industrial economics - A survey. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 5:163-198. Fligstein, N. 1996. Markets as politics: A political-cultural approach to market institutions. American Sociological Review, 61: 656-673. Friedman, J. W. 1971. A non-cooperative equilibrium for supergames. Review of Economic Studies, 28: 1-12. Friedman, J. W., & Thisse, J. F. 1994. Sustainable collusion in oligopoly with free entry. European Economic Review, 38: 271-283. Gargiulo, M., & Benassi, M. 2000. Trapped in your own net: Network cohesion, structural holes, and the adaptation of social capital. Organization Science, 11: 183-196. Gnyawali, D. R., & Madhavan, R. 2001. Cooperative networks and competitive dynamics: A structural embeddedness perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26: 431-445. Gomes-Casseres, B. 1994. Group versus group: How alliance networks compete. Harvard Business Review, 72(4): 62-74. Granovetter, M. S. 1985. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91: 481- 510. Greenfeld, L. 1989. Different Worlds: A sociological study of taste, choices and success in art. Cambridge University Press, New York. Grillo, M. 2002. Collusion and facilitating practices: A new perspective in antitrust analysis. European Journal of Law and Economics, 14:151-169. Gulati, R. 1995. Social structure and alliance formation: A longitudinal analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40: 619-652. Gulati, R. G., & Gargiulo, M. 1999. Where do interorganizational networks come from?. American Journal of Sociology. 104: 1439-1493. Gulati, R. G., Nohria, N., & Zaheer, A. 2000. Strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal, 21: 203-215. Gupta, B., & Venkatu, G. 2002. Tacit collusion in a spatial model with delivered pricing. Journal of Economics, 76: 49-64. Hanneman, R. A. 2001. Introduction to Social Network Methods. University of California: Riverside Press. Jackson, W. A. 2003. Social structure in economy theory. Journal of Economic Issues, 37: 727-746. Jackson M. O., & Wolinsky A. A. 1996. Strategic model of social and economic networks. Journal of Economic Theory, 71:44-74. Kogut, B. 1988. Joint ventures: Theoretical and empirical perspectives. Strategic Management Journal, 9: 319-332. Kraatz, M. S. 1998. Learning by association? Interorganizational networks and adaptation to environmental change. Academy of Management Journal. 41: 621-643. Kreps, D. 1990. Game Theory and Economic Modeling. New York: Oxford University Press. Krugman, P. 1991. Geography and Trade. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Leask, G., & Parker, D. 2007. Strategic groups, competitive groups and performance within the U.K. pharmaceutical industry: Improving our understanding of the competitive process. Strategic Management Journal, 28: 723-745. Lant, T. K., & Baum, J. A. C. 1995. “Cognitive sources of socially constructed competitive groups: Examples from the Manhattan hotel industry”. In W. R. Scott and S. Christensen (eds.), The Institutional Construction of Organizations: International and Longitudinal Studies: 15-38. Sage: Thousand Oaks. Leifer, E., & White, H. C. 1988. A structural approach to markets. In Mark S. Mizruchi and Michael Schwartz (Eds,). Intercorporate Relations: The Structural Analysis of Business: 85-108. New York: Cambridge University Press. Li, S. X., & Rowley, T. J. 2002. Inertia and evaluation mechanisms in interorganizational partner selection. Academy of Management Journal, 45: 1104-1119. MacLeod, W. B., Norman, G., & Thisse, J. F. 1987. Competition, tacit collusion and free entry. The Economic Journal, 97: 189-198. Martin, S. 1988. Industrial Economics: Economic Analysis and Public Policy. Macmillan, New York. McGahan, A. M. 1995. Cooperation in prices and capacities: Trade associations in brewing after repeal. Journal of Law and Economics, 38: 521-559. Nohria, N., & Eccles R. 1992. Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA. Nohria, N., & Garcia-Pont, C. 1991. Global strategic linkages and industry structure. Strategic Management Journal, Summer Special Issue, 12: 105-124. Oliver, C. 1990. Determinants of interorganizational relationships: Integration and future directions. Academy of Management Review, 15: 241-265. Oliver, C. 1991. Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16: 145-179. Peteraf, M., & Shanley, M. 1997. “Getting to know you: A theory of strategic group identity”. Strategic Management Journal, Summer Special Issue, 18: 165–186. Peterson, M., & Rajan, R. 1994. The benefit of lending relationships: Evidence from small business data. Journal of Finance, 49:3-37. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. 1978. The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective, Harper &Row: New York. Pichler, P., & Wilhelm, W. 2001, A theory of the syndicate: Form follows function, Journal of Finance. 56: 2237-2264. Podolny, J. 1993. A status based model of market competition. American Journal of Sociology, 98: 829-872. Porac, J. F., Thomas, H., Wilson, F., Paton, D., & Kanfer, A. 1995. Rivalry and the industry model of Scottish knitwear producers. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40: 203-227. Porter, M. E. 1979. “The structure within industries and companies’ performance”. Review of Economics and Statistics, 61:214–227. Porter, R. H. 2005. Detecting collusion. Review of Industrial Organization, 26: 147-167. Powell, W. W. 1990. Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. Research in Organizational Behavior. 12: 295-336. Rowley, T., & Baum, J. A. C. 2004. Sophistication of interfirm network strategies in the canadian investment banking industry, Scandinavian Journal of Management, 20: 103-124. Rowley, T. J., Baum, J. A. C., Shipilov, A.V., Greve, H.R., & Rao, H. 2004. Competing in groups. Managerial and Decision Economics, 25: 453-471. Rowley, T. J., Greve, H. R., Rao, H., & Baum, J.A.C. 2005. Time to break up: Social and instrumental antecedents of firm exits from exchange cliques. Academy of Management Journal, 48: 499-520. Scherer, F. M., & Ross, D. 1990. Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. Shapiro, C. 1989. Theories of Oligopolistic Behaviour. In Schmalensee, R. and Willig, R.D. (Eds.), Handbook of Industrial Organization: 329-414. Shepherd, W. 1972. The elements of market structure. Review of Economics and Statistics, February: 25-37. Song, W-L. 2004. Competition and coalition among underwriters: The Decision to Join a Syndicate. Journal of Finance, 5: 2421-2444. Symeonidis, G. 2003. In which industries is collusion more likely? Evidence from the UK. Journal of Industrial Economics, 51: 45-74. Tang, M-J., & Thomas, H. 1992. The concept of strategic groups: Theoretical construct or analytical convenience. Managerial and Decision Economics, 13: 323-329. Teece, D. J. 1992. Competition, cooperation, and innovation: Organizational arrangements for regimes of rapid technological progress. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 18: 1-25. Tirole, J. 1989. The Theory of Industrial Organization. Cambridge: MIT Press. Uzzi, B. 1997. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42:35-67. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. 1994. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press. Williamson, O. E. 1985. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, markets, relational contracting. Free Press: New York. Williamson, O. E. 1991. Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36: 269-296. White, H. C. 1981. Where do markets come from?. American Journal of Sociology, 87: 517-547. White, H. C., & Eccles, R. 1987. Producers’ markets. In Eds. J. Eatwell, M. Milgate, & P. Newman. The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics: 984-986. London: Macmillan. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/26933 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 根據社會結構觀點,一個不完全競爭的市場可被視為是一種由多個小團體所構成的社會網絡。每一個小團體都是由幾家廠商所組織而成。而廠商之間不僅彼此競爭,也互相監視。本論文採用社會結構與社會網絡理論,探討過去社會學領域較少關注的廠商勾結行為,同時也為策略管理領域提供了廠商勾結行為的另外一種解釋。本論文假設小團體結構與社會結構特質–角色差異性及地位不一性,將影響群體間的競爭強度,從而影響群體內整體廠商的績效表現。進一步而言,本論文假設在一個穩定結構的小團體內,成員將具有高度的角色差異性與低度的地位不一致性,而這樣的小團體面對的將是較低度的群體間競爭。本論文採用了美國投資銀行業作為實證產業。研究樣本乃是取樣自1997至2006年間曾擔任普通股聯合承銷團之主辦銀行。以成對的主辦銀行過去互相參與承銷團的事件作為互惠關係的基礎,再由此關係建構起社會網絡結構–小團體,並以此來進行假設檢定。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | From the social structure perspective, an imperfectly competitive market can be described as a social network made up of clique-like subgroups of firms that define each other as potential competitors and who monitor each other’s actions. This thesis employs the social structure and social network theory to provide an alternative explanation of a firm’s collusive behavior, an area rarely discussed in the sociological literature. This thesis postulates that the clique and social structural attributes, the role diversity and the position inequality, influence the intensity of competition which in turn affects firms’ performance. This thesis hypothesizes that members coordinated in a stable clique structure are more likely to show less intense competition with higher role diversity and less position inequality. This thesis uses the U.S.A. investment banking industry for its empirical setting. The samples are drawn from those investment banks that conducted underwriting businesses, serving as book runners and joint book runners for new issues of common shares in a syndicate from 1997 till 2006. The reciprocal relationship between two book-runner banks participating in each other’s syndicate construct the social network structure – cliques, which are then used to test the hypotheses of this thesis. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T07:33:07Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-97-D92724005-1.pdf: 1157265 bytes, checksum: 23e5947e3471c9c746b38a3e1e7d95fa (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書……………………………………………………i
摘要……………………………………………………………………ii Abstract………………………………………………………………iii Introduction……………………………………………………………1 Literature Review and Theoretical Background…………………8 Collusion ………………………………………………………………9 Social Structure and Interfirm Network ………………………14 Industrial Context and Hypotheses………………………………19 Industrial Context …………………………………………………20 Clique and Competition ……………………………………………23 Social Structural Attributes and Competition ………………29 Role and Intensity of Competition………………………………30 Position and Intensity of Competition…………………………34 Competition and Performance………………………………………38 Methodology……………………………………………………………42 Sample …………………………………………………………………42 Network Definition …………………………………………………44 Independent Variables………………………………………………47 Dependent Variables…………………………………………………51 Control Variables……………………………………………………54 Results…………………………………………………………………56 Discussions……………………………………………………………65 Conclusions and Suggestions………………………………………69 Reference………………………………………………………………72 Appendix ………………………………………………………………81 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 美國投資銀行業之行動與績效–社會結構觀點 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Social Structure Perspective on Conduct and Performance in the US Investment Banking Industry | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 96-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 博士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 李吉仁(Ji-Ren Lee),蘇國賢(Kuo-hsien Su),陳俊忠(Chun-Chung Chen),林舒柔(Shu-Jou Lin) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 勾結,社會結構,小團體,角色差異性,地位不一致性, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Collusion,Social Structure,Clique,Role Diversity,Position Inequality, | en |
dc.relation.page | 82 | |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2008-06-17 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 國際企業學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 國際企業學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-97-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.13 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。