請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/26875
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 湯明哲 | |
dc.contributor.author | Elizabeth Im | en |
dc.contributor.author | 林銀娥 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T07:30:06Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2008-07-02 | |
dc.date.issued | 2008 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2008-06-30 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Alexander, G., Buchholz, R. 1978. Corporate Social Responsibility and Stock Market Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 21 (3): 479-486.
Baughn, C., Bodie, N., McIntosh, J. 2007. Corporate Social and Environmental Responsibility in Asian Countries and Other Geographical Region. Wiley InterScience, Corporate Social Responsibility Environmental Management, 14: 189–205. Billups, Andrea. March 4, 2008. FTC Reviews Rules to Keep Advertisers True 'Green'. The Washington Times. (Accessed April 13, 2008). Chapple, W., Moon, J. 2005. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in Asia: A Seven-Country Study of CSR Web Site Reporting. Business and Society, 44 (4): 415–441. Chen, K., Metcalf, R. 1980. The Relationship Between Pollution Control Record and Financial Indicators Revisited. The Accounting Review, 55: 68–177. Dowell, G., Hart, S., Yeung, B. 2000. Do Corporate Global Environmental Standards Create or Destroy Market Value. Management Science, 46: 1059–1074. Electronic Documents: Elgin, B. October 29, 2007. Little Green Lies. BusinessWeek.com, http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/07_44/b4056001.htm . (Accessed April 13, 2008). Electronic Documents: Engardio, P. January 19, 2007. Beyond the Green Corporation: Moving Away from Platitudes to Strategies that help World and Bottom Line. BusinessWeek.com. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16710668/page/3. (Accessed April 18, 2008). Electronic Documents: Federal Trade Commission. FTC Office of Public Affairs Website. 2008. http://htc-01.media.globix.net/COMP008760MOD1/ftc_web/FTCindex.html#Jan8_08. (Accessed April 13, 2008). Electronic Documents: Foundation for Corporate Social Responsibility. Newsletter issue dated July 17, 2006, Vol. 3, No. 28, http://www.fcsr.pl/fcsr_eng_newslettery_93.html. (Accessed April 1, 2008). Electronic Documents: Gold, Russell. March 11, 2008. Guess Who Hopes to Help Power New Hybrid Cars. Wall Street Journal, Page B1. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120520656671826555.html. (Accessed April 13, 2008). Electronic Documents: Holstein, W. April 2008. Fine-Tuning Corporate Social Responsibility. BusinessWeek.com, http://www.businessweek.com/managing/content/apr2008/ca2008043_500367_page_2.htm. (Accessed April 18, 2008). Electronic Documents: Prais, Thomas. Feburary 6, 2008. Research Shows Consumers Care About a Company's Ethics. http://www.furniturestyle.com/Magazine/ArticleLanding/tabid/86/Default.aspx?tid=1&contentid=10392&issueid=433. (Accessed April 13, 2008). Electronic Documents: Wikipedia. Corporate Social Responsibility. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_social_responsibility. (Accessed Feb 1, 2008). Electronic Documents: Wikipedia. Socially Responsible Investing. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socially_responsible_investing. (Accessed Feb 1, 2008). Environmental Performance Index. 2006. Pilot 2006 Environmental Performance Index. Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy and the Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN). Fogarty, Ellie, A. Wheelan, Thomas & Hunger, J. David. The Body Shop International PLC: Anita Roddick, OBE. Strategic Management and Business Policy, Pearson-Prentice Hall, 9th Edition, 7.1-7.26. Fombrun, C.J., Gardberg, N.A., & Barnett, M.L. 2000. Opportunity Platforms and Safety Nets: Corporate Citizenship and Reputational Risk. Business and Society Review, 105 (1): 85-106. Friedman, M. September 13, 1970. The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits. New York Times: 122–126. Grace, D., Cohen, S. 2005. Business Ethics; Problems and Cases. Australia: Oxford University Press. Haigh, M. et.al. June 2004. Financial Markets: A Tool for Social Responsibility? Journal of Business Ethics, Dordrecht. 52 (1): 59-71. Inglehart R. 1997. Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Jaggi, B., Freedman, M. 1992. An Examination of the Impact of Pollution Performance on Economic and Market Performance: Pulp and Paper Firms. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 19: 697–713. Kimber, D., Lipton, P. 2005. Corporate Governance and Business Ethics in the Asia–Pacific Region. Business and Society, 44 (2): 178–210. Klassen, R.D., McLaughlin, C.P. 1996. The Impact of Environmental Management on Firm Performance. Management Science, 42 (8): 1199-1214. McWilliams, A., Siegel, D. May, 2000. Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance: Correlation or Misspecification? Strategic Management Journal, 21 (5): 603-609. McWilliams, A., Siegel, D. 2001. Corporate Social Responsibility: A Theory of the Firm Perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26 (1): 117–127. Mill G. 2006. The Financial Performance of a Socially Responsible Investment over Time and a Possible Link with Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 63: 131–148. Murray, A., Sinclair, D., Power, D., Gary, R. 2006. Do Financial Markets care about Social and Environmental Disclosure? Accounting, Audit and Accountability Journal, 19: 228–255. Nwabuzor, A. 2005. Corruption and Development: New Initiatives in Economic Openness and Strengthened Rule of Law. Journal of Business Ethics, 59: 121–138. Porter, M. E., Van der Linde, C. 1995. Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9: 97–118. Porter, M. E., Van der Linde, C. 1995. Green and Competitive; Ending the Stalemate. Harvard Business Review, September-October: 120-135. Porter, M. E., Kramer, M. R. December 2006. Strategy & Society: The Link Between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84 (12). Ramachandran, Pavit. January 1, 2002. The Business Case for Sustainable Development: How to Profit from the Environment. Issue Memo for an Executive Management Consulting Firm. Roux, Michael. Sept. 4, 2007. Climate Conducive to Corporate Action. The Australian: 14. Schnietz, K., Epstein, M. 2005. Exploring the Financial Value of Reputation for Corporate Social Responsibility During a Crisis. Corporate Reputation Review, 7: 327–345. Spicer, B. 1978. Investors, Corporate Social Performance and Information Disclosure: an Empirical Study. The Accounting Review, 33: 94–111. Story, Louise. January 9, 2008. F.T.C. Asks if Carbon-Offset Money Is Well Spent. The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/09/business/09offsets.html. (Accessed April 13, 2008). Vance, S. C. 1975. Are Socially Responsible Corporations Good Investment Risks? Management Review, 64: 18-24. Waddock, S., Graves, S. Apr, 1997. The Corporate Social Performance-Financial Performance Link. Strategic Management Journal, 18 (4): 303-319. Wagner, M., Van Phu, N., Azomahou, T., Wehrmeyer, W. 2002. The Relationship Between the Environmental and Economic Performance of Firms: an Empirical Analysis of the European Paper Industry. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 9: 133–146. Walley, N., Whitehead, B. 1994. It’s Not Easy Being Green. Harvard Business Review, May-June: 46-52. Webster, Ben. January 5, 2008. BA Reprimanded over Claim that New Runway Will Reduce Emissions. Times Online, http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article3134484.ece. (Accessed April 13, 2008). Welford, R. 2005. Corporate Social Responsibility in Europe, North America and Asia. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 17: 33–52. Wheatley, Catherine. February 20, 2002. Many Businesses Seek to Promote 'Corporate Social Responsibility'. Sunday Business: London. Wright, P., S. Ferris. 1997. Agency Conflict and Corporate Strategy: The Effect of Divestment on Corporate Value. Strategic Management Journal, 18 (1): 77-83. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/26875 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Acknowledged are two predominant methods of being a socially responsible corporation, with some corporations contributing with genuine accomplishments vs. mere feel-good gestures that look good on the Environmental Sustainability reports. Choosing to 'Green' a corporation as opposed to merely 'Green-washing' should come with added financial expenditure, but yield more benefits as well. Given the absence of a standardized sustainability reporting system, as well as the sophistication of today's consumer, a firm must fully understand the drivers of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), and move from Corporate Social Responsibility to a new level, which this paper identifies as 'Integrated Corporate Social Responsibility' (ICSR), to attain the credibility it needs to benefit from such a strategy. Such benefits can be both financial and non-financial, and can increase the firm's level of competitive advantage.
In this paper I define ICSR as an enhanced, integrated form of CSR that is more accepted by today's sophisticated consumer that is able to discern which companies are “green-washing” and which are actually “greening.” The main distinguishing factor between CSR and ICSR is that the latter is more than a strategy; it is an integrated way of business. While CSR can be classified as philanthropic activities that have little to nothing to do with the company's main operations, ICSR draws upon the firm's strengths in order to complement the philanthropic activity, as well as directly and indirectly benefit the company's line of operations. This paper outlines several different methods of implementing ISCR into a firm’s line of operations in order to maximize strategic competitive advantage, as well as bring the company’s operations in line with the current climate change regulation landscape. By examining companies across a broad range of industries, this dissertation attempts to show that consumers are willing to pay a premium for environmentally and socially conscious products and brands, which provides evidence that increased competitive advantage is a direct result from ICSR activities. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T07:30:06Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-97-R94724099-1.pdf: 1134569 bytes, checksum: 83551c8d7220df748730d1bcc0aea2c1 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 6
1.1) Corporate Social Responsibility 6 1.2) Motivation of Study 8 1.3) Research Objectives 9 CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW 10 2.1) Criticisms Against CSR 10 A.) Criticisms Against CSR From a Financial Perspective 10 B.) Criticisms Against CSR From a Non-Financial Perspective 12 2.2) What are the Drivers of CSR? 14 A.) Country Influences on CSR Activity 15 B.) Economic Development 16 C.) Equality of Income Distribution 16 D.) Economic Freedom 16 E.) Political Freedom 17 F.) Corruption of Government Officials 17 G.) Connection to the Global Economy 17 CHAPTER 3: CURRENT STRATEGIES 19 3.1) “Greenwashing” 20 A.) Greenwashing Through Advertising 20 B.) Greenwashing Through Corporate Environmental Reports 21 C.) Greenwashing Through Carbon Offsets and Renewable Energy Credits 21 3.2) “Greening” 23 CHAPTER 4: TESTING 24 4.1) Quantifiable Results of CSR 24 A.) Discrepancies in Pricing Products and Their Eco-Friendly Counterparts 25 1.) Automobile Industry 27 2.) Coffee Industry 28 3.) Couture Clothing Industry 28 4.) Hotel Industry 29 5.) Laundry Detergent Industry 29 6.) Lighting Fixture Industry 30 7.) Lotion Industry 30 8.) Paint Industry 30 9.) Shower Fixture Industry 31 10.) Soap Industry 31 11.) Toilet Industry 31 12.) Television Industry 32 13.) Yoga Clothing Industry 32 CHAPTER 5: IMPLEMENTING ICSR TO INCREASE COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE 34 5.1) Streamlining CSR Activities to Fit into Business Operations 34 5.2) The Importance of First Mover Advantage 36 5.3) Ethical Consumerism 38 A.) Appeal to Current and Prospective Consumers and Shareholders 39 1.) ICSR Brand Differentiation Strategy 39 2.) ICSR Advertising Strategy 41 3.) ICSR Consumer Targeting Strategy 43 5.4) Globalization and Market Forces 44 5.5) Social Awareness and Education 44 5.6) Corporate Behaviour and Culture 45 A.) Appeal to Current and Prospective Employees 45 5.7) Government Laws and Regulation 46 A.) Appeal to Government /Law /NGO’s /Community Groups /Other Stakeholders 46 5.8) Consequences and Events 46 A.) Risk Management 47 CHAPTER 6: CONCLUSION 48 REFERENCES 50 CHART SOURCES 57 APPENDICES 58 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 新企業社會責任 (ICSR) | zh_TW |
dc.title | Integrated Corporate Social Responsibility (ICSR): Meeting New Corporate Expectations | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 96-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 吳學良,陳俊忠 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 企業社會責任, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | GREEN-WASHING,CSR,ICSR,COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE,CLIMATE CHANGE REGULATIONS, | en |
dc.relation.page | 59 | |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2008-06-30 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 國際企業學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 國際企業學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-97-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.11 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。