請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/26861
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 吳青松 | |
dc.contributor.author | Wei-Na Huang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 黃維娜 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T07:29:22Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2008-07-07 | |
dc.date.issued | 2008 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2008-07-02 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 中文文獻
1. 吳青松,「國際企業管理理論與實務」,智勝文化事業有限公司出版,1996。 2. 呂鴻德,「Q&A企業策略聯盟」,商周文化事業股份有限公司出版,1996。 3. 沈中華、李建然,「事件研究法,」華泰文化事業股份有限公司出版,2000。 4. 杜曉君,「購併事件宣告時主併公司特質對股東財富影響之研究-以台灣上市公司為例」,東吳大學會計研究所碩士論文,1999。 5. 李文欣,「國際策略聯盟長期績效之研究」,成功大學國際企業研究所碩士論文,2003。 6. 邱柏彰,「台灣電子業上市公司策略聯盟宣告對股東財富的影響」,政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文,1999。 7. 俞海琴、陳慧娟,「我國上市公司成長、槓桿與托賓Q關聯之研究」,風險管理學報第一卷第一期1999年5月,81-101. 8. 陳曉威,「策略聯盟與公司績效關係實證研究-以全球飯店業為例」,政治大學國際貿易研究所碩士論文,2006。 9. 游家豪,「國際策略聯盟宣告對股價影響之研究--以台灣上市、上櫃資訊電子公司為例」,淡江大學會計研究所碩士論文,2001。 10. 賴宜鴻,「企業國際策略聯盟長期績效表現之研究」,成功大學國際企業研究所碩士論文,2002。 11. 鍾依芳,「策略聯盟宣告對公司價值的影響」,中山大學企業管理研究所碩士論文,2004。 英文文獻 1. Anand, B. N. & Khanna, T. (2000) Do firms learn to create value? The case of alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 295-315. 2. Argyris, C. & Schön, D.A. (1978) Organizational Learning. Prentice Hall; United States 3. Arino, A. (2003) Measures of strategic alliance performance: An analysis of construct validity. Journal of International Business Studies, 34, 66-79. 4. Baranson, J. (1990) Transnational strategic alliance- why, what, where, and how, Multinational Business, 2 :54-61. 5. Barkema, H.G. & Vermeulen, F. (1997) What differences in the cultural backgrounds of partners are detrimental for international joint ventures. Journal of International Business Studies 28, 845-864. 6. Beamish, P.W. & Kachra, A. (2004) Number of partners and JV performance. Journal of World Business 39, 107-120. 7. Bierly, P.E. & Kessler, E.H.(1999) The timing of strategic technology partnering, Dynamic Strategic Resources: Development, Diffusion, and Integration. Wiley, New York. 8. Bleeke, J., & Ernst, D. (1995). Is your strategic alliance really a sale? Harvard Business Review, (January–February), 97–105. 9. Bradley, M., G.A. Jarrell, E.H. Kim (1984) On the existence of an optimal capital structure: Theory and evidence, Journal of Finance, 857-880. 10. Brooke, J. & Oliver, B. (2005) The source of abnormal returns from strategic alliance announcements. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 13, 145-161. 11. Burgers, W. P., Hill, C. W. L., & Kim, W. C. (1993) A theory of global strategic alliances: The case of the global auto industry. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 419–432. 12. Byrne, J. A. (1993) The virtual corporation. Business Week, 8, 98–103. 13. Chan, S. H., Kensinger, J. W., Keown, A. J. & Martin, J. D. (1997) Do strategic alliances create value? Journal of Financial Economics, 46, 199-221. 14. Chang, S. C. & Chen, S. S. (2002) The wealth effect of domestic joint ventures: Evidence from Taiwan. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 201-222. 15. Chang, S. C. & Huang, P. C. (2002) Corporate multinationalism, organizational learning, and market reaction to international joint ventures: Evidence from Taiwan. Global Finance Journal, 13, 181-194. 16. Coase, R. H. (1937) The nature of the firm. Economica, 4, 386–405. 17. Das, S., Sen, P. K. & Sengupta, S. (1998) Impact of strategic alliances on firm valuation. The Academy of Management Journal, 41,27-41. 18. Devlin, G. & Bleackley, M. (1988) Strategic alliances- guidelines for success. Long Range Planning, 21, 18-23. 19. Dimaggio, P., & Powell, W. (1983) The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational cost explanation. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 4, 305–336. 20. Dodgson, M. (1993) Organizational learning: A review of some literatures. Organization Studie, 14/3: 375-394. 21. Fiol C. M., & Lyles M A. (1985) Organizational Learning. The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 803-813 22. Hagedoorn, J. & Schakenraad, J. (1994) The effect of strategic technology alliances on company performance. Strategic mangement Journal, 15, 291-309. 23. Hamilton, W. F. (1990). The dynamics of technology and strategy. European Journal of Operational Research, 47, 141–152. 24. Hanvanich, S. & Cavusgil, S. T. (2001) Stock market reactions to international joint venture announcement: an event analysis. International Business Review, 10, 139-154. 25. Hanvanich, S., Rihards, M., Miller, S. R. & Cavusgil S. T. (2005) Technology and the effects of cultural differences and task relatedness: A study of shareholder value creation in domestic and international joint ventures. International business review, 14, 397-414. 26. Harbison, J. R. & Pekar Jr., P. (1997) Cross-Border alliances in the age of collaboration. Booz. Allen & Hamilton. 27. Hill, C. W. L. (2003) International business: competing in the global marketplace 4th ed., McGraw-Hill, New York 28. Kaufmann, J. B. & O’Neill, H. M. (2007) Do culturally distant partners choose different types of joint ventures? Journal of World Business, 42, 435-448. 29. Kogut, S. (1988). Joint ventures: Theoretical and empirical perspectives. Strategic Management Journal, 9, 319–332. 30. Lambe, C. J., Spekman, R. E., & Hunt, S. D. (2002). Alliance competence, resources, and alliance success: Conceptualization, measurement, and initial test. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 30(2), 141–158. 31. Lynch R.P. (1989) The practical guide to joint venture and corporate alliance. John Wiley& Sons, New York. 32. Mason, J. C. (1993). Strategic alliances: Partnering for success. Management Review, 10–15. 33. McCutchen Jr., W. W. & Swamidass, P. M. (2004) Motivations for strategic alliances in the pharmaceutical/biotech industry: Some new findings. Journal of High Technology, 15, 197-214. 34. Myers, S.C. & Turnbull, S.M. (1977) The capital budgeting and the capital asset pricing model-good news and bad news. Journal of Finance, 321-333. 35. Nielsen, B. B. (2007) Determining international strategic alliance performance: A multidimensional approach. International Business Review, 16, 337-361. 36. Pekar Jr., P. & Margulis, M. S. (2003) Equity alliances take center stage: The emergence of a new corporate growth model. Ivey Business Journal. 37. Perlmutter H. V. & Heenan D. A. (1986) Cooperate to compete globally. Harvard Business Review. 38. Pfeffer, J. & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. Harper and Row, New York. 39. Pisano, G. P. (1991). The governance of innovation: Vertical integration and collaborative arrangements in the biotechnology industry. Research Policy, 20, 237–249. 40. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy. New York: Free Press. 41. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage. New York: Free Press. 42. Porter, M.E. and M.B. Fuller. 1986. Coalitions and global strategy. In M.E. Porter, Competition in Global Industries, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press: 315-344. 43. Ranjay, G. (1998) Alliances and networks. Strategic Management Journal. 19:293-317. 44. Shan, W., & Visudtibhan, K. (1990) Cooperative strategy in commercializing an emerging technology. European Journal of Operational Research, 47, 172–181. 45. Shane, S. (1994) The effect of national culture on the choice between licensing and direct foreign investment. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 627-642. 46. Shenkar, O. & Reuer, J. J. (2006) Handbook of strategic alliances. Thousand Oaks, CA. 47. Timan, S. & Wessels, R. (1988) The determinants of capital structure choice, Journal of Finance, 1-19. 48. Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications. Free Press, New York. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/26861 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本研究採用事件研究法,探討公司股價在策略聯盟宣告前後的變動,並針對96件於1998年1月至2007年12月間台灣上市資訊電子產業公司策略聯盟宣告樣本作為研究對象。之後,進一步利用迴歸分析探討公司規模大小、文化距離、自由現金流量、Tobin’s Q、負債比率、研發費用率等變數,在企業宣告策略聯盟前後,是否影響公司股票累積異常報酬。
研究結果顯示: (1) 整體樣本而言,國內股票市場對企業宣告策略聯盟普遍抱持正面的反應,但策略聯盟消息仍存在提前洩漏的問題。 (2) 跨國策略聯盟的宣告效果高於國內策略聯盟假說只得到部分支持。宣告日當天,國內及跨國樣本之異常報酬皆為正向不顯著。事件窗口中,國內樣本均未達到顯著水準,而跨國樣本在五個事件窗口中呈現正向且顯著的累積異常報酬。兩樣本的差距檢定中,皆未達到顯著水準。 (3) 公司規模對策略聯盟宣告效果呈現反向關係,符合過去學者實證結果。 (4) 在整體樣本中,影響策略聯盟宣告效果的變數有公司規模及負債比率; 小規模樣本中,負債比率具有部分解釋能力; 而大規模樣本中,負債比率及研發費用率為影響策略聯盟宣告效果的變數。整體而言,負債比率呈現負向,不符合負債監督假說。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | This study is using event-study methodology to examine the stock abnormal returns on the anncouncement of strategic alliances. The sample consists of 96 strategic alliance announcements made by Taiwanese IT electronics industry listed firms during January 1998 to December 2007. In addition, we examine the key factors- firm size, cultural distance, free cash flow, tobin’s Q, debt ratio and R&D expenditure of the wealth effect of Taiwanese strategic alliance announcement.
The results find that Taiwan stock market responded the strategic alliance announcements mostly with positive abnormal returns, but the problem that announcements leak-out in advance still exist . Moreover, we only find partial support for the hypothesis that international strategic alliances will have relatively higher abnormal returns. Our results find strong support for the hypothesis that firms with smaller size have more favorable stock price reaction. This evidence is consistent with previous research. From the cross-sectional regression results, firm size and debt ratio are factors that have inverse relationship with the stock market response to announced strategic alliances. The result rejects the debt monitoring hypothesis. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T07:29:22Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-97-R95724083-1.pdf: 1033324 bytes, checksum: 2f2a29323a58f2efce71bc90228510c5 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 目錄
第一章 研究動機與目的.......................................1 第一節 研究背景及動機...................................1 第二節 研究目的.........................................2 第三節 章節架構.........................................3 第二章 文獻探討.............................................5 第一節 策略聯盟之定義...................................5 第二節 策略聯盟之動機...................................7 第三節 策略聯盟之型態..................................10 第四節 國家文化差異之影響..............................12 第五節 實證文獻探討....................................13 第三章 假說發展研究設計....................................22 第一節 假說發展........................................22 第二節 樣本收集........................................24 第三節 研究變數之定義..................................25 第四節 研究方法........................................28 第四章 實證結果............................................34 第一節 研究樣本........................................34 第二節 策略聯盟宣告效果................................38 第三節 大規模及小規模公司之策略聯盟宣告效果............47 第四節 迴歸分析........................................54 第五章 結論與建議..........................................61 第一節 結論............................................61 第二節 建議............................................63 參考文獻........................................................64 圖目錄 圖1-1 研究流程圖.................................................4 圖3-1 事件研究時間線............................................29 圖4-1 策略聯盟樣本年度分佈......................................35 圖4-2 國內及跨國樣本年度分佈....................................36 圖4-3 整體樣本累積異常報酬......................................40 圖4-4 國內及跨國樣本之單日累積異常報酬比較......................46 圖4-5 規模大小樣本之單日累積異常報酬比較........................53 表目錄 表2-1 策略聯盟定義彙整表.........................................5 表4-1 策略聯盟樣本年度分佈......................................35 表4-2 國內及跨國樣本年度分佈....................................36 表4-3 樣本產業分佈..............................................37 表4-4 樣本敘述性統計............................................37 表4-5 策略聯盟宣告公司之異常報酬檢定............................39 表4-6 整體樣本之事件窗口累積異常報酬檢定........................40 表4-7 國內及跨國樣本之平均異常報酬檢定..........................43 表4-8 國內及跨國樣本之平均異常報酬差距檢定......................44 表4-9 國內及跨國樣本之事件窗口異常報酬檢定......................45 表4-10 國內及跨國樣本之事件窗口累積異常報酬差距檢定.............46 表4-11 規模大小樣本之平均異常報酬檢定...........................50 表4-12 規模大小樣本之平均異常報酬差距檢定.......................51 表4-13 規模大小樣本之事件窗口累積異常報酬檢定...................52 表4-14 規模大小樣本之事件窗口累積異常報酬差距檢定...............53 表4-15 整體樣本累積異常報酬率之複迴歸分析.......................57 表4-15 小規模樣本累積異常報酬率之複迴歸分析(一).................58 表4-16 小規模樣本累積異常報酬率之複迴歸分析(二).................59 表4-17 大規模樣本累積異常報酬率之複迴歸分析…...................60 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 台灣策略聯盟之實證研究-以資訊電子產業為例 | zh_TW |
dc.title | An Empirical Analysis of Strategic Alliance in Taiwan-Illustrate by IT Electronics Industry | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 96-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 趙義隆,陳俊忠 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 事件研究法,策略聯盟,資訊電子產業,股價, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Event study,strategic alliance,IT electronics industry,stock price, | en |
dc.relation.page | 69 | |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2008-07-02 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 國際企業學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 國際企業學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-97-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.01 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。