請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/26853完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 楊朝成 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Chia-Hui Chou | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 周家卉 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T07:28:59Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2008-07-26 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2008 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2008-07-05 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 1. Aharony, J., and A. Dotan, 1994, “Regular dividend announcements and future unexpected earnings: an empirical analysis”, The Financial Review, Vol. 29, pp.125-151.
2. Akerlof, G., 1970, “The market for “lemons”: quality uncertainty and the market mechanism”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 84, pp.488-500. 3. Alli, K. L., A. Q. Khan, and G. G. Ramirez, 1993, “Determinants of corporate dividend policy: a factorial analysis”, Financial Review, Vol. 28, pp.523-547. 4. Backer, H. K. and Gail E. F., and R. B. Edelman, 1985, “A survey of management views on dividend policy”, Financial Management, Vol. 14, pp.78-84. 5. Baker, H. K. and G. E. Powell, 2000, “Determinants of corporate dividend policy: a survey of NYSE firms”, Financial Practice and Education, Vol. 9, pp.29-40. 6. Benartzi, S., R. Michaely, and R. Thaler, 1997, “Do changes in dividends signal the future or the past?”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 52, pp.1007-1034. 7. Berk, J.B., R.C. Green, and V. Naik, 1999, “Optimal investment, growth options, and security returns”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 54, pp.1553-1607. 8. Bhattacharya, S., 1979, “Imperfect information, dividend policy and the bird in the hand fallacy”, Bell Journal of Economics, Vol. 10, pp.259-270. 9. Bhattacharya, S., 1980, “Nondissipative signaling structures and dividend policy”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 95, pp.1-24. 10. Brennan, M., and A. Thakor, 1990, “Shareholder preferences and dividend policy”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 45, pp.993-1018. 11. Chang, R. P., and S. G. Rhee, 1990, “The impact of personal taxes on corporate dividend policy and capital structure decisions”, Financial Management, Vol. 19, pp.21-31. 12. Chaplinsky, S., and H. N. Seyhun, 1990, “Dividend and taxes: evidence on tax-reduction strategies”, Journal of Business, Vol. 63, pp.239-260. 13. Crutchley, C. and R. Hansen, 1989, “A test of the agency theory of managerial ownership, corporate leverage, and corporate dividends”, Financial Management, Vol. 18, pp.36-46. 14. DeAngelo, H., 1991, “Payout policy and tax deferral”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 46, pp.357-368. 15. DeAngelo, H., L. DeAngelo, 1990, “Dividend policy and financial distress: an empirical investigation of troubled NYSE firms”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 45, pp.1415-1431. 16. DeAngelo, H., L. DeAngelo, and D. J. Skinner, 1992, “Dividends and losses”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 47, pp.1837-1863. 17. DeAngelo, H., L. DeAngelo, and D. J. Skinner, 2004, “Are dividends disappearing? Dividend concentration and the consolidation of earnings”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 72, pp.425-456. 18. Dempsey, S. J., and G. Laber, 1992, “Effects of agency and transaction costs on dividend payout ratios: further evidence of the agency-transaction cost hypothesis”, Journal of Financial Research, Vol. 15, pp.317-321. 19. Easterbrook, F. H., 1984, “Two agency-cost explanations of dividends”, American Economic Review, Vol. 74, pp.650-659. 20. Faccio, M., L. Lang, and L. Young, 2001, “Dividends and expropriation”, American Economic Review, Vol. 91, pp.54-78. 21. Fama, E., 1974, “The empirical relationships between dividend and investment decisions of firms”, American Economic Review, Vol. 64, pp.304-318. 22. Fama, E. F., and H. Babiak, 1968, “Dividend policy: an empirical analysis”, Journal of American Statistical Association, Vol. 63, pp.1132-1161. 23. Farrar, D. E., and L. L. Selwyn, 1967, “Taxes, corporate financial policy and return to investors”, National Tax Journal, Vol. 20, pp.444-454. 24. Frankfurter, G. M., B.G. Wood, and J. Wansley, 2003, “Dividend policy theory and practice”, Academic Press, pp.108-139. 25. Gordon, M. J., 1963, “Management of corporate capital”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 18, pp.264-272. 26. Grullon, G., R. Michaely, and B. Swaminathan, 2002, “Are dividend changes a sign of firm maturity?”, Journal of Business, Vol. 75, pp.387-424. 27. Higgins, R. C., 1972, “The corporate dividend-saving decision”, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Methods, Vol. 7, pp.1527-1541. 28. Huberman, G., 1990, “Dividend neutrality with transaction costs”, Journal of Business, Vol. 63, pp.93-106. 29. Jensen, G. R., D. P. Solberg, and T. S. Zorn, 1992, “Simultaneous determination of insider ownership, debt and dividend policies”, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 27, pp.247-263. 30. Jensen, M. C., 1986, “Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeover”, American Economic Review, Vol. 76, pp.323-329. 31. Jensen, M. C. and W. H. Meckling, 1976, “Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 3, pp.305-360. 32. Kalay, A. and U. Loewenstein, 1985, “Predictable events and excess returns: The case of dividend announcements”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 14, pp.149-175. 33. Lintner, J., 1956, “Distribution of incomes of corporations among dividends, retained earnings, and taxes”, American Economic Review, Vol. 46, pp.97-113. 34. Meyer, M., P. Milgrom, and J. Roberts, 1992, “Organizational prospects, influence costs, and ownership changes”, Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Vol. 1, pp.9-35. 35. Miller, M. H. and F. Modigliani, 1961, “Dividend policy, growth and the valuation of shares”, Journal of Business, Vol. 34, pp.411-433. 36. Miller, M. H. and M. S. Scholes, 1978, “Dividend and taxes”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 6, pp.333-364. 37. Miller, M. H. and M. S. Scholes, 1982, “Dividend and taxes: some empirical evidence”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 90, pp.1118-1141. 38. Moh’d, Mahmoud A., L. G. Perry, and J. N. Rimbey, 1995, “An investigation of the dynamic relationship between agency theory and dividend policy”, The Financial Review, Vol. 30, pp.367-385. 39. Myers, S. and S. Majluf, 1984, “Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 13, pp.187-221. 40. Nissim, D. and A. Ziv, 2001, “Dividend changes and future profitability”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 56, pp.2111-2133. 41. Pruitt, S. W. and L. J. Gitman, 1991, “The interactions between the investment, financing, and dividend decisions of major U.S. firms”, Financial Review, Vol. 26, pp.409-430. 42. Riley, J. G., 1979, “Informational equilibrium”, Econometrica, Vol. 47, pp.331-360. 43. Rozeff, M. S., 1982, “Growth, beta and agency costs as determinants of dividend payout ratios”, Journal of Financial Research, Vol. 5, pp.249-259. 44. Smith, C. W., Jr., and R. L. Watts, 1992, “The investment opportunity set and corporate financing, dividend, and compensation policies”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 32, pp.263-292. 45. Spence, A. M., 1973, “Job market signaling”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 87, pp.355-374. 46. Sterk, W., and P. Vandenberg, 1990, “The market valuation of cash dividends and the tax differential theory of dividend policy: a case revisited”, Financial Review, Vol. 25, pp.441-455. 47. Yoon, P. S., and L. Starks, 1995, “Signaling, investment opportunities, and dividend announcements”, Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 8, pp.995-1018. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/26853 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 在完美的資本市場中,投資人可以自製股利,所以公司的股利政策並不會影響公司價值。但許多學者提出在實際的世界中公司為何要發現金股利的原因,這使得找出發放現金股利背後的原因是個有趣的議題,本研究的目的即是以實證研究探討現金股利的決定因素。
本研究利用五個假說探討2001年至2006年台灣上市公司現金股利政策背後的影響因素,五個假說包含測試現金股利和交易成本、公司獲利能力的關係、現金流量假說(cash flow hypothesis)、成熟假說(maturity hypothesis),以及現金管道假說(cash channeling hypothesis)。實證結果支持現金流量假說(cash flow hypothesis)及現金管道假說(cash channeling hypothesis);此外,台灣上市公司發放現金股利的行為亦和交易成本有關,且和公司獲利能力成高度正相關。但實證上未顯示當公司投資機會變少時,會增加發放給股東的現金股利,亦即不支持成熟假說(maturity hypothesis)。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Dividend policy does not matter to the investor in a perfect financial market as they can create homemade dividends from the market. But a lot of researches provide reasonable and convincing logic to explain why firms pay out cash dividends in the real world. So, it is interesting to find out the determinants of the cash dividend behind. The subject of this study is an empirical investigation of the determining factors of dividend policy.
This study uses financial data of Taiwan listed firms from 2001 through 2006 to examine the motives behind firms for paying out cash dividends. Five hypotheses, including cash flow hypothesis, maturity hypothesis, cash channeling hypothesis and relationship between cash dividend and transaction costs and profitability, are tested in this study. The empirical results support the free cash flow hypothesis and cash channeling hypothesis. The results also indicate that cash dividend payment behaviors of the Taiwan firms are related to transaction costs and largely consistent with earning ability. But there is no evidence showing firms pay out cash dividends to stockholders when the investment opportunities of the firms decline, thus rejecting the maturity hypothesis. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T07:28:59Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-97-R95723042-1.pdf: 273270 bytes, checksum: a9934bb51f9180c4604086cce6eac7e2 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝 i
中文摘要 ii Abstract iii Content iv Table Content vi 1. Introduction 1 2. Theoretical Background 3 2.1 Research Related to Dividend 3 2.2 Theory and Hypotheses for Determinants of Dividend Policy 6 3. Definitions of Proxies 15 3.1 Dependent Variable 15 3.2 Independent Variables 15 3.3 Control Variables 17 4. Data and Methodology 19 5. Empirical Results 21 5.1 Data Description 21 5.2 Correlation Matrix 22 5.3 Two-sample Comparison 23 5.4 Determinants of Cash Dividends 26 6. Robust Tests 29 6.1 Firm Size 29 6.2 Leverage Level 35 7. Conclusion 40 References 41 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.subject | 現金股利 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | dividend | en |
| dc.title | 台灣上市公司現金股利政策之決定因素探討 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | What drives the dividend policy of Taiwan firms? | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 96-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳勝源,周麗娟 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 現金股利, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | dividend, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 43 | |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2008-07-07 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 財務金融學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 財務金融學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-97-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 266.87 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
