請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/26802完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 簡怡雯 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ying Chen | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 陳穎 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T07:26:22Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2008-07-21 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2008 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2008-07-11 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Baker, Michael J. and Gilbert A. Churchill, Jr. (1977), “The Impact of Physically Attractiveness Models on Advertising Evaluations.” Journal of Marketing Research, 14 (November), 538-55.
Bargh, John A. and Paula Pietromonaco (1982), “Automatic Information Processing and Social Perception: The Influence of Trait Information Presented outside of Conscious Awareness on Impression Formation,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(September), 437-49. Bearden, William O., Richard G. Netemeyer, and Mary F. Mobley (1993), Handbook of Marketing Scales, Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Caballero, Marjorie J. and William M. Pride (1984), “Selected Effects of Salesperson Sex and Attractiveness in Direct Mail Advertisements,” Journal of Marketing, 48 (Winter), 94-100. Chaiken, Shelly (1980), “Heuristic versus Systematic Information Processing in Attention and Comprehension Process,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39 (November), 752-66. Chaiken, Shelly, Akiva Lieberman, & Alice H. Eagly, (1989), Heuristic and Systematic Processing within and beyond the Persuasion Context. NY: Guilford. Dholaka, Ruby R. and Sternthal, Brian (1977), “Highly Credible Sources: Persuasive Facilitators or Persuasive Liabilities,” Journal of Consumer Research, 3 (4), 223-32. Eagly, Alice H. and Shelly Chaiken (1993), The Psychology of Attitudes, Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. Forehand, Mark R. and Andrew Perkins (2005), “Implicit Assimilation and Explicit Contrast: A Set/Reset Model of Response to Celebrity Voice-Overs,” Journal of Consumer Research, 32 (3), 435-41. Friedman, Hershey and Linda Friedman (1979), “Endorser Effectiveness by Product Type,” Journal of Advertising Research, 19 (October/November), 63-71. Gass Robert. H. and Seiter, John S. (2003), Persuasion, Social Influences, and Compliance Gaining, 2nd edition. MA: Allyn & Bacon. Grewal, Dhruv, Jerry Gotlieb, and Howard Marmorstein (1994), “The Moderating Effects of Message Framing and Source Credibility on the Price-Perceived Risk Relationship,” Journal of Consumer Research, 21 (June), 145-53. Helson, Harry (1964), Adaptation-Level Theory: An Experimental and Systematic Approach to Behavior, NY: Harper & Row. Herr, Paul M., Steven J. Sherman, and Russell H. Fazio, (1983), “On the Consequences of Priming: Assimilation and Contrast Effects,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19 (4), 323-40. Higgins, E. Tory and G.illian A. King (1981), Accessibility of social constructs: Information processing consequence of individual and contextual variability. Personality, Cognition, and Social Interaction, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 69-121. Hovland, Carl I. and Walter Weiss (1951), “The Influences of Source Credibility on Communication Effectiveness,” Public Opinion Quarterly, 15 (Winter), 635-50. Joseph, W. Benoy (1982), “The Credibility of Physically Attractive Communicators: A Review,” Journal of Advertising, 11 (July), 15-24. Kahl, Lynn R. and Pamela M. Homer, (1985), “Physical Attractiveness of the Celebrity Endorser: A Social Adaptation Perspective,” Journal of Consumer Research, 11 (March), 945-61. Kamins, Michael A. (1990), “An Integration into the “Match-Up” Hypothesis in Celebrity Advertising: When Beauty May be Only Skin Deep,” Journal of Advertising, 19, 4-13. Kamins, Michael A. and Kamin Gupta (1994), Congruence between Spokesperson and Product Type: A Matchup Hypothesis Perspective. Psychology and Marketing, 11(6), 569-86. Kang, Yong-Soon and Paul M. Herr (2006), “Beauty and the Beholder: Toward an Integrative Model of Communication Source Effect,” Journal of Consumer Research, 33 (June), 123-30. Koering, Stephen K. and Albert L. Page (2002), “What If Your Dentist Looked Like Tom Cruise? Applying the Match-Up Hypothesis to a Service Encounter,” Psychology and Marketing, 19(1), 91-110 Lu, Duan-Wen. (2004), The Influences of Source-Product Category Relevance, Source Credibility and Consumers’ Involvement on Product Attitudes, Master Thesis, Graduate Institute of Business Administration, National Taiwan University. Marrow, Alfred J. (1938), “Goal Tension and Recall,” Journal of General Psychology, 19, 3-64. Marshall, Christy (1987), “It Seemed Like A Good Idea at the Time,” Forbes, 14., 98-9. Martin, Leonard L. (1986), “Set/Reset: Use and Disuse of Concepts in Impression Formation,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51 (September), 493-504. Martin, Leonard L. and John W. Achee (1992), “Beyond accessibility: The role of processing objectives in judgment,” in The Construction of Social Judgments, ed. Leonard L. Martin and Abraham Tesser, Hillsdale, NY: Erlbaum, 195-216. Martin, Leonard L., John J. Seta, & Rick A. Crelia, (1990), “Assimilation and Contrast as a Function of People’s Willingness and Ability to Expend Effort in Forming an Impression,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 27-37. McCracken, Grant (1989), “Who Is the Celebrity Endorser? Cultural Foundations of the Endorsement Process,” Journal of Consumer Research, 16 (December), 310-21. Miniard Paul W., Sunil Bhatla, Kenneth. R. Lord, Peter R. Dickson,, and H. Rao Unnava (1991), “Picture-Based Persuasion Processes and the Moderating Role of Involvement,” Journal of Consumer Research, 18 (June), 92-107. Moore, Robert S., Claire Allison Stammerjohan, and Robin A. Coulter (2005), “Banner and Advertiser-Web site Context Congruity and Color Effects on Attention and Attitudes,” Journal of Advertising, 34 (2), 71-84. Ohanian, Roobina (1991), “The Impact of Celebrity Spokespersons’ Perceived Image on Consumers’ Intention to Purchase,” Journal of Advertising Research, 31 (1), 46-54. Parducci, Allen (1965), “Category Judgments: A Range-Frequency Model,” Psychological Review, 72, 407-418. Peterson, Robert A. and Roger A. Kerin (1977), “The Female Role in Advertisements: Some Experimental Evidence,” Journal of Marketing, 41 (October), 59-63. Petty, Richard E. and John T. Cacioppo (1981), “Attitudes and Persuasion: Classic and Contemporary Approaches,” Durbuque, IA: William C. Brown. Petty, Richard E., John T. Cacioppo and David Schumann (1983), “Central and Peripheral Routes to Advertising Effectiveness: The Moderating Role of Involvement,” Journal of Consumer Research, 10(September), 135-46. Petty, Richard E., Stephen G. Harkins, and Kipling D. Williams (1980), “The Effects of Group Diffusion of Cognitive Effort on Attitudes: An Information-Processing View,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 81-92. Petty, Richard E. and Duane T. Wegener (1997), The Flexible Correction Model: The Role of Naïve Theories of Bias in Bias Correction. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 141-208. _____ (1998), “Attitude Change: Multiple Roles for Persuasion Variables,” in the Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol.1, 4th ed., ed. Daniel T. Gilbert, Susan T. Fiske, and Gardner Lindzey, New York: McGraw-Hill, 323-90. _____ (1999), “The Elaboration Likelihood Model: Current Status and Controversies,” in Dual Process Theories in Social Psychology, ed. Shelly Chaiken and Yaacov Trope, New York: Guilford, 41-72. Petty, Richard E., Duane T. Wegener, and Paul H. White (1997), “Flexible Correction Process in Social Judgment: Implication for Persuasion,” Social Cognition, 16 (1), 93-113. Petty, Richard E., Gary L. Wells, and Timothy C. Brock, (1976), “Distraction Can Enhance or Reduce Yielding to Propaganda: Thought Disruption versus Effort Justification,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34:5 (November), 874-84. Rossiter, John R. and Larry Percy (1980), “Attitude Change through Visual Imagery in Advertising,” Journal of Marketing, 9, 10-16. Shavitt, Sharon, Suzanne C. Swan, Tina M. Lowrey, and Michaela Wänke (1994), “The Interaction of Endorser Attractiveness and Involvement in Persuasion Depends On the Goal That Guides Message Processing,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 3 (2), 137-62. Sherif, Muzafer, & Carl I. Hovland. (1961), “Social Judgment: Assimilation and Contrast Effects in Communication and Attitude Change,” New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Sherman, Stanford (1985), “When You Wish Upon A Star,” Fortune, 138, 66-73. Schwarz, Norbert and Herbert Bless (1992a), “Constructing Reality and Its Alternatives: An Inclusion/Exclusion Model of Assimilation and Contrast Effects in Social Judgment,” In The Construction of Social Judgments, ed. Leonard L. Martin and Abraham Tesser, Hillsdale, NY: Erlbaum, 217-45. ________ (1992b), Social and the public’s trust in politicians: Assimilation and contrast effects. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 574-79. Strack, Fritz, Norbert Schwarz, Herbert Bless, Almut Kübler, and Michaela Wänke, (1993), “Awareness of the influences as a determinant of assimilation versus contrast,” European Journal of Social Psychology, 23 (1), 53-62. Till, Brian D. and Michael Busler (1998), “Matching Products with Endorsers: Attractiveness versus Expertise,” Journal of Consumer Marketing, 15 (6), 576-86. ________ (2000), “The Match-Up Hypothesis: Physical Attractiveness, Expertise, and the Role of Fit on Brand Attitude, Purchase Intent and Brand Beliefs,” Journal of Advertising, 29 (3), 1-13. Till, Brian D, Sarah Haas, and Randi Priluck (2006), “Understanding Celebrity Endorsement: A Classical Conditioning Approach,” American Marketing Association Conference Proceedings, Chicago, 17, 241. Tom, Gail, Rebecca Clark, Laura Elmer, Edward Grech, Joseph Masetti, Jr., and Harmona Sandhar (1992), “The Use of Created versus Celebrity Spokespersons in Advertisements,” Journal of Consumer Marketing, 9 (4), 45-51. Wegener, Duane T. and Richard E. Petty, (1995), “Flexible Correction Processes in Social Judgment: The Role of Naïve Theories in Corrections for Perceived Bias,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(1), 36-51. Wilson, Elizabeth J. and Daniel L. Sherrell (1993), “Source Effects in Communication and Persuasion Research: A Meta-analysis of Effect Size”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 21 (2), 101-12. Wyer, Robert S., & Thomas K. Scrull (1981), Category Accessibility: Some Theoretical and Empirical Issues Concerning the Processing of Social Stimulus Information. In Social Cognition: The Ontario symposium Vol. 1, ed. E. Tory Higgins, C. Peter Herman & M. P. Zanna, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 161-97. Zeigarnik, Bluma (1927), 'Über das Behalten erledigter und unerledigter Handlungen,' Psychologische Forschung, 9, 1-85. Zeigarnik, Bluma (1938), “On Finished and Unfinished Tasks,” A Source Book of Gestalt Psychology, 300-14, Reprinted and condensed from Psychologische Forschung, 1927, 9, 1-85. Zhang, Yong and Richard Buda (1999), “Moderating Effects of Need for Cognition on Responses to Positively versus Negatively Framed Advertising Messages,” Journal of Advertising, 28 (2), 1-15. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/26802 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 修正行為的相關研究一直是在社會心理學領域備受重視的議題之一，本篇論文將修正行為應用至消費者行為研究領域，並進一步探討產品論點、代言人、以及代言人與產品相關度等因素在其中扮演的角色。本研究在Elaboration Likelihood Model的基礎上，補足了不足的一塊，證實高涉入並不一定就會修正知覺偏誤、代言人形象與代言產品不符也不見得就會產生負面效果、產品論點相對偏弱也可能因代言人形象良好而產生正面的產品態度。實際修正行為的發生受到產品論點是否充足、代言人是否與代言產品相關、以及代言人是否受歡迎等三個因素的共同影響。唯有當產品論點不足、代言人形象與代言產品不符、且代言人相當受歡迎等三個條件都滿足的情況下，修正行為才可能發生。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | The current research aims to examine how consumers correct their product attitudes when the advertised product is advocated by a favorable endorser. It is predicted that the correction behavior is built on a complicated mechanism co-operated by factors of involvement, argument quality, source-product relevance, and source-favorability. Highly involvement consumers treat source as one argument as well, and when other persuasive arguments are not sufficient to form product attitudes, they will focus on processing source. If source-implied arguments are not relevant to the focal product, correction behavior is likely to occur, and a favorable source may generate negative source effects when over-corrected. Results of the current study support this hypothesis. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T07:26:22Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-97-R93741015-1.pdf: 8618265 bytes, checksum: 08791b9ba6858fc962d829e3d43b27db (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 謝辭 i
中文摘要 ii ABSTRACT iii TABLE OF CONTENTS iv LIST OF TABLES vii LIST OF FIGURES viii CHAPTER 1 STUDY PURPOSE 1 CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW 9 2.1 Processing Models 9 2.1.1 Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM) 9 2.1.2 Multiple Roles of Persuasion Variables 12 2.2 Message Source and Credibility 15 2.2.1 Message Source 15 2.2.2 The Information Processing of Source Credibility in Persuasion 15 2.3 Cues and Product Relevance 17 2.4 Match-Up Hypothesis in Advertising 19 2.5 Context Effect – Assimilation and Contrast 22 2.6 Correction Models 24 2.6.1 The Set/Reset Model 24 2.6.2 The Inclusion/Exclusion Model 29 2.6.3 The Flexible Correction Model (FCM) 30 CHAPTER 3 STUDY FRAMEWORK AND PROPOSED HYPOTHESES 35 3.1 Study Framework 35 3.2 Hypotheses 39 3.3 Uniqueness of Current Study 47 CHAPTER 4 METHOD OF RESEARCH 51 4.1 Pretest 51 4.1.1 Purpose 51 4.1.2 Design of Experiment 52 4.1.3 Participants 53 4.1.4 Results 53 4.2 Main Experiment 55 4.2.1 Design of Experiment 55 4.2.2 Participants 57 4.2.3 Materials 57 4.2.4 Procedure 58 4.3 Independent Variables 60 4.4 Dependent Measures 63 4.4.1 Dependent Variable 63 4.4.2 Manipulation Checks 64 CHAPTER 5 RESULTS 70 5.1 Manipulation Checks on Independent Variables 70 5.2 Dependent Measures 73 5.2.1 Dependent Variable in High Involvement Conditions 78 5.2.2 Dependent Variable in Low Involvement Conditions 85 CHAPTER 6 GENERAL DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION 90 6.1 Conclusions 90 6.2 Managerial Implications 96 6.3 Limitations 99 6.4 Future Research Direction and Suggestions 100 REFERENCES 103 APPENDIX 1 QUESTIONNAIRES IN PRETEST 113 APPENDIX 2 QUESTIONNAIRES IN MAIN EXPERIMENT 132 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.subject | 涉入 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 偏誤修正 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 產品論點 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 來源效果 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 修正行為 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 來源─產品相關度 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | bias correction | en |
| dc.subject | source-product relevance | en |
| dc.subject | source effects | en |
| dc.subject | argument quality | en |
| dc.subject | involvement | en |
| dc.subject | correction behavior | en |
| dc.title | 涉入程度、產品論點、與訊息來源對消費者態度修正的影響 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Consumer Correction Behavior: Involvement, Argument Quality, and Source Effects | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 96-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 蕭中強,練乃華 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 偏誤修正,修正行為,涉入,產品論點,來源效果,來源─產品相關度, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | bias correction,correction behavior,involvement,argument quality,source effects,source-product relevance, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 161 | |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2008-07-14 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 商學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 商學研究所 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-97-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 8.42 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。