請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/26622
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 陳思寬 | |
dc.contributor.author | Chuan-Chou Lee | en |
dc.contributor.author | 李權洲 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T07:17:54Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2008-08-06 | |
dc.date.issued | 2008 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2008-07-25 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Corden, W. (1972): “Monetary Integration”, Essays in International Finance, No. 93, Princeton University.
Friedman, M. (1953): Essays in Positive Economics, University of Chicago. De Grauwe, P. and Y. Aksoy (1999): “Are Central European Countries Part of the EuropeanOptimum Currency Area?”, in: De Grauwe, P. and V. Lavrac (eds): Inclusion of CentralEuropean Countries in the European Monetary Union, pp. 13-36. Fidrmuc, J. and F. Schardax (2000): “More ‘Pre-ins’ Ante Portas?”, Focus on Transition, 5, 2, pp. 28-47. Fidrmuc J. and I. Korhonen(2006), “Meta-analysis of the business cycle correlation between the euro area and the CEECs”, J. Comp. Econ. 34 (2006), pp. 518–537 Fleming, J. Marcus., (1971) “On Exchange Rate Unification,” The Economic Journal, Vol. 81, pp.467-88. Frankel, J. and A. Rose (1998): “The Endogeneity of the Optimum Currency Area Criteria”,Economic Journal, 108, pp. 1009-1025. Horvath, R.& L. Komarek (2002),'Optimum Currency Area Theory : An Approach For Thinking About Monetary Integration,' The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS) 647, University of Warwick, Department of Economics. Ingram, J.C. (April 1973), 'The Case for the European Monetary integration.' Princeton University,Essays in International Finance, No. 98. Kenen, P. (1969): “The Optimum Currency Area: An Eclectic View”, in: Mundell, R. and A.Swoboda (eds): Monetary Problems of the International Economy, Chicago. Krugman, P. (1993): “Lessons of Massachusetts for EMU”, in Torres, F. and F. Giavazzi (eds), Adjustment and Growth in the European Monetary Union, pp. 241-69. Masson, P. R., and Mark P. Taylor (1993), “Policy Issues in the Operation of Currency Unions”, Cambridge University Press. Maurel, M. (2002): “On the Way to EMU Enlargement towards CEECs: What Is the AppropriateExchange Rate Regime?”, CEPR Discussion Paper, No. 3409. Mundell, R. A. (1961): “A Theory of Optimum Currency Areas”, American Economic Review, 51,pp. 657-65. Mundell, R. (1973): “Uncommon Arguments for Common Currencies”, in: Johnson, H. and A.Swoboda (eds): The Economics of Common Currencies, Allen and Unwin, St. Leonards. McKinnon, R. (1963): “Optimum Currency Areas”, American Economic Review, 52, pp. 717-25. P.Backe and Thiman. C , (2004) The acceding countries’ strategies towards ERM II and the adoption of the euro: an analytical review, European Central Bank, Feb, 2004 Scitovsky, Tibor. (1966), “A New Approach to International Liquidity”, The American Economic Review, Vol. 56, No. 5, pp. 1212-1220 中文參考文獻 李顯峰、符勇(2001),歐元—誕生與發展,台北:華泰出版社,頁100-101。 馬千惠(1995),歐洲貨幣整合之探討,美歐月刊,台北:第10 卷第9 期,頁51-50。 何淑美(1999),歐洲貨幣整合之發展與前瞻,台灣大學。 曾俊賢(1999),歐元穩定性之探討,台灣大學。 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/26622 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 歐盟自2004擴大以來,新增了中歐與東歐的國家,近年來這些國家也不斷的調整其國內的經濟情況以符合馬垂斯克條約的標準(Maastricht Criteria),因而改變了國內的各項經濟指標,以更符合加入貨幣區間的要素,降低遭受非系統性衝的機會,並可增加吸收衝擊的能力。本文引用最適貨幣區間理論的景氣循環與經濟開放程度等四項經濟屬性檢測其是否具備加入最適貨幣區間的條件,同時也檢測這些國家中馬斯垂克趨合要件的各項變數,以比較兩者間的差異。
本文結論認為雖然大部分新加入國家在趨合要件上有達到標準,但除斯洛維尼亞外,各國的收入水平仍遠低於歐元區的水平; 而除賽普勒斯與馬爾他外,各國銀行資產佔GDP的比例都較低於歐元區的國家,凸顯出雖然舊有共產國家以完全轉換成市場經濟,但其經濟的基礎結構似乎仍須一些時間來調整。另雖新加入各國與歐元區的景氣循環不低,產業結構差異也在一定的範圍內,但比其既有歐盟區的大部分國家,仍有一段需要努力的空間。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | After the EU enlargement in 2004, the new acceding countries from central and east Europe had been continuously adjusting their domestic economic situation to fulfill the Maastricht Criteria and satisfy the factors for joining the optimal currency area, so that they can lower the opportunities of suffering the asymmetry shock and increase the ability to absorb shocks. Four economic factors such as openness and the correlation of business cycle are examined in this paper to understand if the new acceding countries are adapted to join this currency area. Meanwhile, in order to compare the difference of OCA theory and Maastricht Criteria, the variables of Maastricht Criteria will also be examined.
The conclusion of this paper shows that, though most new acceding countries fulfill the requirements of Maastricht Criteria, except to Slovenia, the income level of countries are still far behind the average of euro area. Except to Malta and Cyprus, the ratio of banking assets to GDP of new acceding countries are also lower than the euro countries. That shows though those old community countries were transformed their economics system to market economics, it still takes time to adjust the foundation of economics structures. The other results shows that the new acceding countries have high business cycle synchronization with the euro area and the differences of the industry structure are not obvious, but it still need more effort to catch up the level of most euro area countries. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T07:17:54Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-97-R93724041-1.pdf: 947696 bytes, checksum: 92e4ab367a1897f55feb096fcb6d7773 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 目錄
第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機及目的 1 第二節 研究架構說明 2 第二章 歐元的誕生與擴大 3 第一節 歐洲經濟整合的開始-歐洲共同體 3 第二節 歐洲貨幣整合的開端-韋納報告 4 第三節 歐洲貨幣制度 5 第四節 狄羅報告 6 第五節 馬斯垂克條約-採用歐元三階段 8 第六節 馬斯垂克趨合要件 11 第三章 文獻探討 10 第一節 最適貨幣區間理論回顧 10 第二節 單一貨幣的經濟利益與成本 14 第四章 研究方法 16 第一節 理論基礎 16 第二節 研究方法 16 第三節 研究範圍、研究期間及資料來源 17 第五章 歐元採用的適當性分析 21 第一節 經濟屬性檢測 21 第二節 名目趨合要件比較 34 第六章 結論與建議 40 第一節 研究發現 40 第二節 後續研究方向 41 參考文獻 42 表圖目錄 圖5-1 GDP per capita in Purchasing Power Standards (PPS) (EU-27 = 100) 22 圖5-2 2002 Gross value added distribution by three sectors 23 圖5-3 2006 Gross value added distribution by three sectors 24 圖5-4 經濟開放程度 26 圖5-5 Acceding countries trade with the EU: (Share of imports from EU in total imports (%)) 27 圖5-6 Acceding countries trade with the EU: (Share of exports from EU in total exports (%)) 28 圖5-7 1997-2007去趨勢後GDP數列與既有歐元區國家的相關係數 29 圖5-8 Deposit Interest Rate(Percentage), 2003-2006 31 圖5-9 Lending Interest Rates (Percentage), 2003-2006 31 圖5-10 Spreads between Deposit and Lending Rate(Percentage), 2003-2006 32 圖5-11 各國銀行資產佔GDP的百分比 33 圖5-12 通貨膨脹率(Harmonized Consumer Price Index,HCPI) 34 圖5-13 預算赤字佔GDP比例 35 圖5-14 政府債務餘額佔GDP的百分比 36 圖5-15 長期利率 37 表5-1 各項趨合要件整理 38 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 歐元區擴大之路—2004年新加入歐盟十國探討 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The road to enlargement of Euro area—
A study of EU acceding countries in 2004 | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 96-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 萬哲鈺,張銘仁 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 歐洲經濟暨貨幣同盟,歐盟擴大,最適貨幣區間理論, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | European Monetary and Economics Union,EU enlargement,Optimal Currency Area, | en |
dc.relation.page | 41 | |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2008-07-28 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 國際企業學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 國際企業學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-97-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 925.48 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。