請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/26170
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 黃恆獎(Heng-Chiang Huang) | |
dc.contributor.author | Hsiu-Tai Lin | en |
dc.contributor.author | 林秀黛 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T07:01:56Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2009-02-18 | |
dc.date.issued | 2009 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2009-02-11 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 參考文獻(中文部份)
1.于倩若、陳家齊編譯,2008/7/15,「美國拯救兩大房貸公司房利美和房地美的計畫分析」,經濟日報 2.中華經濟研究院編撰,行政院經建會發行,2008/12/25,國際經濟情勢雙周報,第1670期 3.王志誠,2008/11/6,「連動債銷售爭議與金融監理」,聯合報 4.吳修辰、溫建勳、王茜穎,2008/10/20,「一個交易員的告白」,商業周刊,第1091期:122~130 5.李俊緯,2008/10/27,「金融海嘯台灣波及的程度及因應之道與文宣策略」,財團法人國家政策研究基金會國政評論 NPF commentary,財金(評) 097-152 號 6.周國偉、李俊緯,2008/10/27,「由金融成熟度著手,提升台灣競爭力」,財團法人國家政策研究基金會國政評論 NPF commentary,財金(評) 097-151 號 7.柯承恩、羅澤裕,1998,「跨世紀管理控制新方法-平衡計分卡規劃與設計之本土經驗」,會計研究月刊,第155期:28~38 8.商業周刊與TVBS民意調查中心,2008,「金融機構信任度調查」調查報告,訪查時間:10/6~10/9 9.郭淑慧,2007.6,投資人屬性與資產配置關係之研究- 以某銀行理財中心為例, 輔仁大學管理學研究所在職專班碩士論文 10.焦玉慧,2008/9/25,「面對全球金融風暴的台灣因應之道」,財團法人國家政策研究基金會國政評論 NPF commentary,財金(評) 097-121 號 11.賀先蕙、李郁怡、單小懿,2008/10/13,「歐洲大崩盤」, 商業周刊,第1090期 :50~62 12.楊少強,2008/9/22,「金融海嘯:雷曼兄弟破產啟示錄」,商業周刊,第1087期 :102~112 13.劉天業、曾羚、徐曉薇,2007,「被動式管理投資策略在我國市場之應用分析」, 證交資料,552期:6~77 14.摩根富林明投顧,2008,「美國政府接管二房 全球股市正面期待危機結束」摩根富林明投顧市場研究報告,2008-9-9 15.鄧欣怡,2008/9/24,「雷曼兄弟破產對台灣之影響」,財團法人國家政策研究基金會國政評論 NPF commentary ,財金(評) 097-120 號 16.謝劍平,1999,財務管理新觀念與本土化(再版),台北:智勝文化 17.謝劍平,2004,當代金融市場,台北:智勝文化 18.蘇裕惠、柯承恩,2000.9,「銀行經營策略與平衡計分卡」,世華銀行月刊:6~20 參考文獻(英文部分) 1.Brinson, Gary P., Hood, L. Randolph & Beebower, Gilbert L. 1986. Determinants of portfolio performance. Financial Analysts Journal , Jul-Aug: 39-44 2.Brockhaus,R.H. 1980. Risk-taking propensity of entrepreneurs. Academy of Management Journal, 23: 509-520 3.Byrne, Kathleen 2005. How do consumers evaluate risk in financial products? Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Sep 2005 (10): 21-36 4.Ganzach,Y., & Karsahi, N. 1995. Message framing and buying behavior:A field experiment. Journal of Business Research, 32: 11-17 5.Kaplan, Robert S., & Norton, David P. 1992. The balanced scorecard-measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1): 71-79 6.Kaplan, Robert S., & Norton, David P. 1993. Putting the balanced scorecard to work. Harvard Business Review, 71(5): 134-142 7.Kaplan, Robert S., & Norton, David P. 1996. The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action, Boston: Harvard Business School 8.Kopecki, Dawn. 2008, Sep.11th. U.S. Considers Bringing Fannie, Freddie on to Budget. Bloomberg.com http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&sid=adr.czwVm3ws&refer=home 9.Levin, I. P., Schneider, S. L., & Gaeth, G. J. 1998. All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76: 149-188. 10.MacCrimmon, K.R., & Wehrung, D.A. 1990. Characteristic of risk taking executives. Management Science, 36: 422-435 11.March, J.G.1988. Decisions and organization. London: Basil Blackwell 12.Osborn. R. N., & Jackson. D. H. 1986. Leaders, riverboat gamblers or purposeful unintended consequences in the management of complex dangerous technologies. Academy of Management Journal, 31: 924-947 13.Puto, Christopher P. 1987. The framing of buying decision. Journal of consumer research, 14(December): 301-315 14.Schoemaker, P. 1990. Are risk attitudes related across domains and response modes? Management Science, 36: 1451-1461 15.Seligman, M.E.P. 1975. Helplessness. San Francisco : Freeman 16.Sitkin, S. B., & Weingart, L. R. 1995. Determinants of risky decision-making behavior: A test of the mediating role of perceptions and propensity. Academy of Management Journal, 38: 1573-1592. 17.Sitkin, S., & Pablo, A. 1992. Reconceptualizing the determinants of risk behavior. Academy of Management Review, 17: 9-38. 18.Smith, Gerald E.1996. Framing in advertising and the moderating impact of consumer education. Journal of personality and Social Psychology, 22(3): 257-268 19.Staw, B.M., & Ross, J. 1987. Behavior in escalation situations: Antecedents, prototypes and solutions. In B.M. Staw and L.L. Cummings (Eds.) Research in organizational behavior, 9: 39-78. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press 20.Thaler, R.H., & Johnson, E.J. 1990. Gambling with the house money and trying to break even: The effects of prior outcomes on risky choice. Management Science, 36: 643-660 21.The Economist. 2008, Sep. 8th . Suffering a seizure: America’s government takes control of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae. Economist.com http://www.economist.com/finance/displaystory.cfm?story_id=12078933 22.Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. 1981. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211: 453-458. 23.Woodside, Arh G., & Alan E, S. 1994. Social interaction effects in the framing of buying decision. Psychology andMarketing, 11(1): 27-34 24.Yates, J. F., & Stone, E. R. 1992. The risk construct. In J. F. Yates (Ed.), Risk-taking behavior : 1-25. New York: John Wiley and Sons. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/26170 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 2008年全美第四大投資銀行雷曼兄弟 ( Lehman Brothers )宣佈破產,引爆了百年罕見的金融海嘯,這波危機讓全球自此陷入一個惡性循環;尤其是民眾因為投資虧損、工作不保或被降薪,消費更為謹慎緊縮,導致全球性的經濟衰退與負成長。但如果說這是無法避免的系統風險,為何仍有這麼多投資人不甘損失?究其原因正是投資銀行的財務槓桿日益擴張,理財商品的複雜度提升,銀行無法真正為客戶把關,而客戶在投資之際也未能提高風險警覺,才引發一連串的銷售爭議。
從大到一個國家政府,小到一家投資銀行、一個投資人,在這整個風暴中「風險」因為被低估甚至忽略,以致最後面臨無法收拾的局面。因此本研究試圖將範圍從探討金融海嘯的成因,到如何了解投資人的風險屬性,進而檢討國內金融主管機關所訂定的商品適合度政策,以及提供建議給國內銀行銷售理財商品之參考,期能避免不適當的商品銷售與日後的客訴爭議與損失。 透過理論的驗證,本研究發現在目前各銀行所使用的「客戶投資風險屬性問卷」或評量表,確實存在著過於簡化或有失偏頗的問題:基於客戶投資經驗的成敗與風險傾向之間有正向關係,問題框架的影響也與風險知覺有正向關係,因此應該加強在此部分的問卷設計,以分析出客戶真正的風險屬性;主管機關甚至可以主導設計一標準問卷與評量方法要求銀行遵循。另外在銷售流程上,提供客戶相關資訊與風險揭露能夠幫助客戶對未來的預期報酬與風險認知更正確,同時協助客戶做長期資產配置的投資才能夠真正分散風險。最後,針對落實銀行銷售流程與商品適合度政策的重要角色理財專員,建議透過平衡計分卡以及與客戶資產成長連結的獎勵制度來達到真正管理理專銷售行為與考核績效的辦法,以提供真正適合客戶風險屬性或需求的理財商品建議,建立銀行與客戶長期良好的信賴關係。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | In year of 2008, Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., the fourth major investment bank in US, released the adjudication of bankruptcy which has ignited the financial tsunami for a century. The crisis pulls the whole world into a vicious circle. Especially people’s investment loss, job discontinuity or payroll cut down make the consumption more prudently and tightened and which also cause the global economy recession and decline. But if this is an unavoidable systematic risk, why still have unwilling losses from so many investors. It is exactly caused by the financial leverage expanded by those investment banks and the complexity of investment products has been increased day by day. The agent banks did not play the role properly of managing product risk and customers also failed in the investment risk vigilance, which result a sequence of selling disputes.
From big as a national government to even as small as an investment bank or an investor all finally have to face such uncontrollable and unsettled situation because the “risk” is underestimated and neglected in this crisis storm. The research attempt to probing from the origin cause of financial tsunami, to the risk attribute of investors, and then discuss the investment product suitability policy required by Financial Supervisory Commission of MOF and Bankers Association of R.O.C. The last is to provide reference and suggestions for investment sales of domestic banks to prevent customer disputes and losses from inappropriate sales. Through the theory verification, this research discovered the problem of “customer risk attribute questionnaire” currently used by banks is over-simplified or biased. In order to receive the true survey result for customer risk attribute, the design of questionnaire should be re-evaluated and modified due to the positive correlation between past investment experience and risk propensity, and the positive correlation between problem framing and risk perception. Even Financial Supervisory Commission of MOF or Bankers Association of R.O.C. should take the leader role to set up a standard questionnaire and measurement method for all banks complying with. In terms of sales process, providing relevant information and risk disclosure can help customers to be more correct in return expectation and risk perception. At the same time, asset allocation for long term investment also can assist customers to disperse the risk. Finally, to the important role of personal banker who implements the investment sales process and product suitability policy, the research propose the method of balanced-scorecard and AUM linked incentive plan for managing the personal banker’s behavior and evaluating the sales performance. These all aim at offering the right products to right customers and meeting customer’s financial needs for establishing the long term relationship and trust between the bank and customers. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T07:01:56Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-98-P95746021-1.pdf: 2338050 bytes, checksum: 3f31d77d8af45a879afa33f0600ba17c (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌 謝 iv
中文摘要 v THESIS ABSTRACT vi 目 錄 viii 圖目錄 ix 表目錄 x 第一章 緒 論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的與架構 2 第二章 金融海嘯的成因與現況 4 第一節 百年罕見的金融海嘯 4 第二節 金融海嘯對台灣的影響 13 第三章 文獻探討 25 第一節 風險知覺對與投資決策過程的影響 25 第二節 問題框架對風險知覺的影響 30 第三節 過去經驗結果對風險傾向的影響 34 第四節 現代投資組合理論對風險分散的影響 36 第五節 平衡計分卡的管理意涵 40 第四章 銀行銷售理財商品現況之探討 43 第一節 客戶與商品風險分級制度 43 第二節 商品資訊與相關風險的揭露 54 第三節 銷售流程與理財業務人員獎勵制度 62 第五章 商品適合度政策之檢討與建議 69 第一節 客戶投資經驗的重要性 69 第二節 問題框架與評量方法的差異性 72 第三節 資產配置與平衡計分卡制度的落實 77 第六章 研究結論與建議 84 第一節 研究結論 84 第二節 研究限制與未來研究建議 89 參考文獻(中文部份) 91 參考文獻(英文部分) 93 附錄 95 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 銀行銷售理財商品流程與商品適合度政策探討 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Study on the investment sales process and product suitability policy in consumer banking | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 97-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 劉順仁,王仕茹 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 風險傾向,風險知覺,風險揭露,問題框架,資產配置,平衡計分卡,商品適合度政策, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Risk propensity,Risk perception,Risk disclosure,Problem framing,Asset allocation,Balanced scorecard,Product suitability policy, | en |
dc.relation.page | 101 | |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2009-02-11 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 國際企業管理組 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 國際企業管理組 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-98-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 2.28 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。