Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 管理學院
  3. 會計學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/26123
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor林世銘(Su-Ming Lin)
dc.contributor.authorJie-Yu Chenen
dc.contributor.author陳婕瑜zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-08T07:00:48Z-
dc.date.copyright2009-07-14
dc.date.issued2009
dc.date.submitted2009-05-29
dc.identifier.citation[1] 王方伶與楊慧敏,2005,淺談承銷制度改進措施,證券暨期貨月刊第23卷第6期,26-33頁。
[2] 李建興,2009,台灣IPO折價因素的探討--分量迴歸分析法,證券市場發展季刊第21卷。
[3] 李建興、顏碧霞與宋孟哲,2006,IPO影響因素之探討-分量迴歸, 第三屆應用經濟研討會。
[4] 宋孟哲,2006,IPO期初報酬率影響因素之探討,義守大學未出版碩士論文。
[5] 林坤宏,2006,承銷制度變革對新上市櫃股票短期報酬績效之影響,台灣大學未出版碩士論文。
[6] 林象山,1995,承銷商信譽對新上市股票之影響,中國財務學刊,第3卷第1期,119-143頁。
[7] 林象山、薛富井與陳長利,1999,新股訂價偏誤對承銷商公司價值的影響,管理評論,第18 卷,第1 期,97-111 頁。
[8] 邱垂昌與黃怡婷,2007,公司治理機制與初次上市櫃公司承銷價低估關聯性之研究,商管科技季刊,第8卷第3期,367-389頁。
[9] 洪振虔,2000,台灣地區IPO 股票價格績效與獲利績效之研究,中山大學企業管理研究所未出版博士論文。
[10] 洪振虔、吳欽杉與陳安琳,2003,新上市公司股票刻意偏低定價之影響因素—隨機前緣模式的運用,管理學報,第20 卷,第1 期,113-141 頁。
[11] 胡德中、曾曉萍與馬黛,2005,重新檢視IPO釋股決策—門檻模型的應用,台灣金融財務季刊,第6輯第2期,85-102頁。
[12] 施光訓、蔡明春與陸仲華,2005,IPO 議價因素之探討 - 承銷商觀點, 會計與公司治理第2卷,第2期,79-108頁。
[13] 夏侯欣榮,1993,台灣地區新上市普通股承銷價格之研究,政治大學企業管理研究所未出版博士論文。
[14] 馬黛與胡德中,2003,承銷配售機制之決定及其對IPO 折價之影響:競價拍賣、詢價圈購與公開申購,財務金融學刊,第11卷第1期,1-40頁。
[15] 許凱旋,2006,IPO折價幅度早期預測因子之探討,義守大學未出版碩士論文。
[16] 陳安琳,1997,新上市公司股票相關之理論與實證文獻回顧,管理學報,第14卷第3期,403-436頁。
[17] 陳安琳、李文智與林宗源,1999,新上市公司股票之發行折價-代理成本與公司控制之研究,中國財務學刊,第6 卷,3 期,1-23 頁。
[18] 陳軒基、葉秀娟與陳右超,2003,承銷商與折價程度:台灣初次上市櫃股票之實證分析,證券市場發展季刊,第14 卷,第4 期,175-198頁。
[19] 曾姿蓉,2006,臺灣股票上市時機與異常報酬關聯性之研究,銘傳大學未出版碩士論文。
[20] 黃志典與簡亨容,2000,公司基本要素可以解釋蜜月行情嗎?,台銀季刊,第51卷第2期。
[21] 黃志仁、吳睿怡,2007,上市閉鎖期之盈餘管理行為,交大管理學報第27卷第2期,275-296頁。
[22] 黃蘭霙,2004,我國證券承銷制度的演進與沿革,證券暨期貨月刊第23卷第5期,4-16頁。
[23] 張仕原,2007,中國大陸首次公開發行折價因素之探討,成功大學未出版碩士論文。
[24] 廖芝敏,2005,承銷新制變革影響及其因應,證券暨期貨月刊,第23卷第6期,14-25頁。
[25] 顧廣平,2003,台灣新上市股票短期與長期績效之再探討,證券市場發展季刊,第15卷,1-40頁。
[26] Aggarwal, R., and Rivoli, P. 1990. Fads in the initial public offering market? Financial Management 19: 45-57.
[27] Allen, F. and Faulhaber, G.. 1989. Signalling by underpricing in the IPO market. Journal of Financial Economics 23: 303-323.
[28] Akerlof, George A.. 1970. The Market for 'Lemons': Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics 84: 488-500.
[29] Baron, D. 1982. A model of the demand of investment banking advising and distribution services for new issues. Journal of Finance 37: 955-976.
[30] Beatty, R. P., and Ritter, J. R. 1986. Investment banking, reputation, and the underpricing of initial public offerings. Journal of Financial Economics 15: 213-232.
[31] Bhattacharya. 1980. The 'Hot Issue' Market of 1980. The Journal of Business 57(2): 215-40.
[32] Bower, N.L. 1984. Firm Value and Choice of Offering Method in Initial Public Offerings. Journal of Finance 44: 647-662.
[33] Brennan, M. J. & Franks, J. 1997. Underpricing, ownership and control in initial public offerings of equity securities in the UK. Journal of Financial Economics 45: 391-413.
[34] Carter, R. and Manaster, S. 1990. Initial public offerings and underwriter reputation. Journal of Finance 45: 1-10.
[35] Chaganti, Rajeswararao, Damanpour, Fariborz. 1991. Institutional Ownership, Capital Structure, and Firm Performance. Strategic Management Journal 12: 479-492.
[36] Chua, Lena. 1995. A Reexamination of the Costs of Firm Commitment and Best Efforts IPOs. The Financial Review 30: 337-365.
[37] Dechow, P. M., Sloan, R. G., and Sweeney, A. P. 1995. Detecting earnings management. The Accounting Review 70: 193-225.
[38] DeAngelo. 1981. Auditor Independence, ‘Low Balling’, and Disclosure Regulation. Journal of Accounting and Economics: 113-127.
[39] Downer, D., and Heinkel, R. 1982. Signaling and valuation of new issues. Journal of Finance 44: 393-420.
[40] Dunbar, C. G. 2000. Factors affecting investment bank initial public offering market share. Journal of Financial Economics 55: 3-41.
[41] Fama, E. and French, K. 1992. The cross section of expected stock returns. Journal of Finance 47: 427-465.
[42] Francis, J. R. and D. J. Stokes. 1986. Audit Prices, Product Differentiation, and Scale Economies: Further Evidence from the Australian Market. Journal of Accounting Research: 383-393.
[43] Grinblatt, M.and Hwang, C.Y. 1989. Signaling and the pricing of new issues. Journal of Finance 44: 393-420.
[44] Gleason, Johnston and Madura. 2008. What factors drive IPO aftermarket risk? Applied Financial Economics 18.
[45] Hedge, S. and Miller, R. 1989. Market-making in initial public offerings: an empirical analysis. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 24: 75-90.
[46] Ibbotson, R.G. and Jaffe J. F. 1975. ‘Hot issue’ markets. Journal of Finance 30: 1027-1042.
[47] Ibbotson, R. G. and Ritter, J. R. 1995. Initial public offering. Handbooks of Operations Research and Management Science.
[48] Jegadeesh, N., Weinstein, M., and Welch, I. 1993. An empirical investigation of IPO returns and subsequent equity offerings. Journal of Financial Economics 34: 153-175.
[49] Jing Chi and Carol Padgett. 2002. The Performance And Long-Run Characteristics Of The Chinese IPO Market. Pacific Economic Review 10: 451-469.
[50] Krinsky, I., and Rotenberg, W. 1989. Signalling and the valuation of unseasoned new issues revisited. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 24: 257-266.
[51] Kunz, R. M. and Aggarwal, R. 1994. Why initial public offerings are underpriced: Evidence from Switzerland. Journal of Banking and Finance: 705-723.
[52] Lee, P. J., Taylor, S. L., and Walter, T. S. 1996. Expected and realised returns for Singaporean IPOs: Initial and long-run analysis. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 4: 153-180.
[53] Leland, H. and Pyle, D. 1977. Informational asymmetries, financial structure and financial intermediation. Journal of Finance 32: 371-387.
[54] Lin, T. and R. Fok. 1997. The information content of IPOs price adjustment, International Journal of finance 9: 650-667.
[55] Logue, D. 1975. On the pricing of unseasoned equity issues:1965-1969, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 8: 91-103.
[56] Loughran, T., Ritter, J. R., and Rydqvist, Kristian. 1994. Initial public offerings: international insights. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 2: 165-199.
[57] McGuinness, P. 1992. An examination of the underpricing of initial public offerings in Hong Kong: 1980-90. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 19: 165-186.
[58] Miller, M.H. and Modigliani, F. 1961. Dividend Policy, Growth, and the Valuation of Shares. Journal of Business 34: 411-433.
[59] Muscarella, C., and Vetsuypens, M. 1989. A simple test of Baron‘s model of IPO underpricing. Journal of Financial Economics 24: 125-135.
[60] Keasey, K. and P. McGuinness. 1992. An Empirical Investigation of the Role of Signaling in the Valuation of Unseasoned Equity Issues. Accounting and Business Research: 133-142.
[61] Reinganum M.R. 1981. Misspecification of CAPM : Empirical Anowalies Rased on Earnings yield and Market Value. Journal of Financial Economics: 19-45.
[62] Ritter, J. R. 1984. The ‘hot issue’ market of 1980. Journal of Business 57: 215-240.
[63] Ritter, J. R. 1991. The long-run performance of initial public offerings. Journal of Finance 46: 3-27.
[64] Ritter, J. R., and Welch, I. 2002. A Review of IPO Activity, Pricing and Allocations. The Journal of Finance7: 1795-1828.
[65] Rock, K. 1986.Why new issues are underpriced. Journal of Financial Economics 15: 187-212.
[66] Shiller, Robert J. 1981. Do stock prices move too much to be justified by subsequent changes in dividends? American Economic Review 71: 421-436.
[67] Shleifer, A. 1986. Do demand curves for stocks slope down? Journal of Finance 41: 579-590.
[68] Tinic, S. 1988. Anatomy of initial public offerings of common stock. Journal of Finance 43: 789-822.
[69] Titman, S., and Trueman, B. 1986. Information quality and the valuation of new issues. Journal of Accounting and Economics 8: 159-172.
[70] Welch, I. 1989. Seasoned offerings, imitation costs, and the underpricing of initial public offerings. Journal of Finance 44: 421-449.
[71] Welch, I. 1991. An empirical examination of models of contract choice in initial public offerings. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 26: 497-518.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/26123-
dc.description.abstract本論文旨在探討我國在承銷新制下,初次上市櫃公司股價在上市櫃首日超額報酬之關鍵影響要素。我國金管會於民國94年正式施行承銷新制,並以承銷價訂定之適切性為目標,故取消新股上市櫃首五日漲跌幅限制並廢除舊制之承銷價格計算公式,以承銷商與發行公司彼此協議以定出合理之承銷價格。本研究之樣本期間,特設定為民國95年1月1日至民國96年12月31日,藉以排除承銷新制施行初期之市場適應期間以及美國次貸風暴引發之全球金融危機之影響。
研究結果發現,我國初次上市櫃公司股價於上市櫃首日確實存在正向超額報酬,且明顯高於在舊制下之初期報酬。而影響該超額報酬之主要因素為承銷商、市場景氣,與公司產業。當發行公司之承銷商市佔率越低、上市櫃當時市場景氣越好以及發行公司所屬產業為高科技產業時,其上市櫃首日超額報酬越高;推測在承銷新制下,新上市櫃公司首日超額報酬主要受到承銷商之議價能力影響,而傾向迎合發行公司定出較高承銷價之承銷商,較易受發行公司之青睞,因而擁有較高之市佔率。此外,市場景氣較好時,投資人易有較高的投資意願,符合熱市發行與一時熱潮假說。而當發行公司為高科技產業時,投資人會有對未來較樂觀的期待,使初期超額報酬較高。
再者,本研究依訊息傳遞理論設定之諸多變數,如董監持股、財務表現、公司規模、公開申購之中籤率與產業變數,其中僅產業變數為正向顯著,其餘皆不顯著,顯示我國股票市場在新上市櫃公司初期報酬部分,對於新上市櫃公司個別特質之相關訊息不甚重視。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThis paper investigates the key factors which affect the initial public offering (IPO) stocks’ initial excess returns after implementing the new underwriting regulation. The Financial Supervisory Committee started to implement the new underwriting regulation in 1995. In order to make a proper offer prices for IPO stocks, the Financial Supervisory Committee canceled the price limits in the first five days after public offering, abolished former formula in calculating underwriting prices, and allowed to set offer prices by negotiations between the underwriter and the public issuer. To avoid the influence of the global financial meltdown caused by the US Subprime Mortgage Crisis, and to avoid the adaption period of implementing the new underwriting regulation, we use samples from January 2006 to December 2007.
The results show that there are short-run excess returns after the IPO stocks listing, and the excess returns are obviously higher than before. The key factors which affect the excess returns most are underwriters, market economic conditions, and the industry which the issuers belong to. The underwriters with larger market shares are negatively related to companies’ initial excess returns. We speculate this is because under the new underwriting regulation, the IPO stocks’ initial excess returns will be led by the bargaining powers of the issuers and the underwriters, and the underwriters who tend to cater to the issuers, making higher offering prices, easily to have larger market shares. On the other hand, the better market economic conditions, and high-tech industry are positively related to the companies’ initial excess returns because according to “Hot Issue Market” and “Fad Hypothesis”, the investors will prefer to invest more money if the economy is better, and the investors will have more optimistic expectation of the issuers if the industry is high-tech.
Furthermore, according to the signaling hypothesis, we set several variables to test, such as shareholding of the boards and directors, financial performances, firm size, allotment, and industry. Within those variables, only industry is positive significant, which implies the IPO stocks’ initial excess returns are not related to the issuers’ individual characteristics.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T07:00:48Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-98-R96722034-1.pdf: 1215472 bytes, checksum: 57ad7383ae06dede2de540c24c0ba8ef (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2009
en
dc.description.tableofcontents目錄
謝詞 i
中文摘要 ii
Abstract iii
目錄 iv
圖表目錄 vi
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景 1
第二節 研究動機與目的 2
第三節 論文架構與研究流程 4
第二章 文獻探討 6
第一節 初次上市櫃股票初期超額報酬之歷史經驗 6
一、 國外歷史經驗 6
二、 國內實證研究 6
第二節 初次上市櫃股票初期超額報酬因素之假說探討 8
一、 證券承銷商與新上市公司刻意低估承銷價格 8
二、 市場錯誤評價理論 16
第三節 承銷制度歷史沿革與承銷新制規範 17
一、 承銷業務簡介與基本定義 17
二、 承銷制度演進 19
三、 承銷制度改進具體措施 21
第三章 研究方法 27
第一節 樣本選取與資料來源 28
一、 樣本選取 28
二、 資料來源 29
第二節 實證假說 30
一、 設立假說 30
二、 控制變數 33
第三節 迴歸模型與變數 35
第四章 研究結果與分析 38
第一節 敘述性統計分析 38
一、 變數敘述統計分析 38
第二節 多元迴歸分析 45
一、 自變數 46
二、 控制變數 49
第五章 結論與建議 52
第一節 研究結論 52
一、 承銷新制對超額報酬之影響 52
二、 承銷商與超額報酬之關連 52
三、 市場景氣與超額報酬之關連 53
四、 產業與超額報酬之關連 53
五、 訊息傳遞假說與超額報酬之關連 53
第二節 研究建議 54
一、 對投資人之建議 54
二、 對主管機關之建議 54
三、 對後續研究之建議 55
第三節 研究限制 56
一、 非公開資料取得不易 56
二、 資料之真實性 56
參考文獻 57
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.title初次上市櫃公司首日超額報酬因素之探討zh_TW
dc.titleExploring the Critical Factors on the IPO
First-Day Excess Returns
en
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear97-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee陳國泰,黃美祝
dc.subject.keyword承銷新制,發行公司,初次上市櫃,超額報酬,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordthe new underwriting regulation,issuers,IPO,initial excess returns,en
dc.relation.page62
dc.rights.note未授權
dc.date.accepted2009-06-01
dc.contributor.author-college管理學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept會計學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:會計學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-98-1.pdf
  目前未授權公開取用
1.19 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved