請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/26117完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 廖咸興 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Chia-Wu Lu | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 盧嘉梧 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T07:00:40Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2009-06-08 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2009 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2009-06-02 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Black, F. and J. C. Cox, 1976, “Valuing corporate securities: Some effects of bond indenture provisions.” Journal of Finance 31, 351-367.
Collin-Dufresne, P., and R., Goldstein, 2001, “Do credit spreads reflect stationary leverage ratios?” Journal of Finance 56, 1929-1957. Collin-Dufresne, P., R. Goldstein, and J. S. Martin, 2001 “The determinants of credit spread changes.” Journal of Finance 56, 2177-2208. Cox, C. , J. E Ingersoll and S.A. Ross, 1985b, “A theory of the term structure of interest rate.” Econometrica 53, 385-407. Crouhy, M. and D., Galai, 1994, “The interaction between the financial and investment decisions of the firm: The case of issuing warrants in a levered firm.” Journal of Banking and Finance 18, 861-880. Crosbie, P. J., 1999, “Modeling default risk.” Moody’s KMV Co., San Francisco, CA. Duffee, G. R., 1999, “Estimating the price of default risk.” Review of Financial Studies 12, 197-225. Duffie, D., 1998, “Defaultable term structure models with fractional recovery of par.” Working Paper, Graduate School of Business, Stanford University. Duffie, D. and K. J. Singleton, 1999, “Modeling the term structures of defaultable bonds.” Review of Financial Studies 12, 687-720. Duffie, D. and D. Lando, 2001, “Term structure of credit spread with incomplete accounting information.” Econometrica 68, 633-664. Duffie, D., L., Saita and K., Wang, 2007, “Multi-period corporate failure prediction with stochastic covariates.” Journal of Financial Economics 83, 635-665. Eom, Y.H., J., Helwege, J.Z., Huang, 2004, “Structural models of corporate bond pricing: An empirical analysis.” Review of Financial Studies 17, 499-544. Fischer, E.O, R. Heinkel, and J. Zehner, 1989, “Dynamic capital structure choice”, Journal of Finance 44, 19-40. Geske, R., 1977, “The valuation of corporate liabilities as compound options.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 12, 541-552. Goldstein, R., N., Ju and H., Leland, 2001, “An EBIT Based Model of Dynamic Capital Structure.” Journal of Business 74, 483-512. Gupton, G.M., C.C., Finger and M., Bhatia, 1997, “CreditMetrics – Technical document.” New York: J.P.Morgan. Hull, J. and A., White, 1995, “The impact of default risk on the prices of options and other derivative securities.” Journal of Banking and Finance 19, 299-322. Jarrow, R. A. and S. M., Turnbull, 1995, “Pricing derivatives on financial securities subject to credit risk.” Journal of Finance 50, 53-86. Jokivuolle, E. and S. Peura, 2003, “A Model for Estimating Recovery Rates and Collateral Haircuts for Bank Loans.” European Financial Management 9(3): 299–314. Jones, E., S., Mason and E., Rosenfeld, 1984, “Contingent claims analysis of corporate capital structures: An empirical investigation.” Journal of Finance 39, 611-627. Kim, I. J., K., Ramaswamy and S. M., Sundaresan, 1993, “Does default risk in coupons affect the valuation of corporate bonds? A contingent claims model.” Financial Management 22, 117-131. Lando, D., 1998, “On Cox processes and credit risky securities.” Review of Derivatives Research 2, 99-120. Leland, H., and K. Toft, 1996, “Optimal capital structure, endogenous bankruptcy, and the term structure of credit spreads.” Journal of Finance 51, 987-1019. Liao, H.H., T.K. Chen, and C.W. Lu, 2008, “A flow-based corporate credit model.” Working Paper, National Taiwan University. Liao, H.H., T.K. Chen, and C.W. Lu, 2009, “Internal liquidity risk in corporate bond yield spreads---Bond- and market-level evidences.” Working Paper, National Taiwan University. Liao, H.H, T.K. Chen, and C.W. Lu, 2009, “Bank credit risk and structural credit models: Agency and information asymmetry perspectives.” Journal of Banking and Finance, forthcoming. Longstaff, F. and Schwartz, E., 1995. “A simple approach to valuing risky fixed and floating rate debt.” Journal of Finance 50, 789-819. McQuown J.A., 1997, “Market versus accounting-based measures of default risk.” Option Embedded Bonds, Irwin Professional Publishing, Chicago. Merton, R.C., 1974, “On the pricing of corporate debt: The risk structure of interest rates.” Journal of Finance 29, 449-470. Ogden, J.P., 1987, “Determinants of the ratings and yields on corporate bonds: Tests of the contingent claims model.” Journal of Financial Research 10, 329-339. Opler, T., and Titman, S., 2001, “The debt-equity choice.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 36, 1-24. Unal, H., D., Madan and L., Güntay, 2003, “Pricing the risk of recovery in default with APR valuation.” Journal of Banking and Finance 27, 1001-1025. Vasicek, O., 1977. An equilibrium characterization of the term structure. Journal of Financial Economics 5, 177-188. Vasicek, O. A., 1984, Credit Valuation, KMV Corporation. Wilson, T., 1997a, “Portfolio credit risk, I.” Risk 10, Sep, 111-117. Wilson, T., 1997b, “Portfolio Credit Risk, I.” Risk 10, Oct, 56-61. Yu, F., 2005, “Accounting transparency and the term structure of credit spreads.” Journal of Financial Economics 75, 53-84. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/26117 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究建立一個整合存量基礎與流量基礎的結構型企業信用風險評估模型。與傳統結構型模型不同點在於，傳統結構型模型僅考慮存量基礎的違約（資產不足以抵償債務）風險，而本研究模型則同時考慮存量基礎的違約型態，以及流量基礎的違約（流動性償付不能）風險，並可內生化地決定企業未來的違約機率。經由數值分析的結果顯示，相對於傳統Merton形式的存量基礎模型傾向於低估短期違約機率，本研究模型具有較能捕捉短期的違約風險之特點；此外，實際應用本模型於評估樣本銀行之違約風險，亦顯示本模型能增進短期違約機率評估之有效性。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This study develops an integrated structural-form credit risk model which combines both stock-based and flow-based corporate credit information. The new model differs from traditional structural-form credit models in that it considers not only stock-based default but also flow-based insolvency. This model can generate endogenously a firm’s probabilities of default, resulting from either asset inadequacy or liquidity crunch. Numerical analyses show that the model can catch short-term default risk which is underestimated by traditional Merton-type stock-based models. An application to a bank sample shows that this model is able to improve the effectiveness for evaluating short-term default probabilities. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T07:00:40Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-98-D93723008-1.pdf: 429124 bytes, checksum: bcbc4809d9b45ce66e19f90b11011d21 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | Contents
I. Introduction 1 II. The Model 5 A. Stock-based Credit Risk Model 5 B. Flow-based Credit Risk Model 6 C. Integrated structural-form credit risk model 8 III. Numerical Analysis 10 IV. Preliminary Application to Sample Banks 12 A. Sample Bank Selection Criteria 13 B. Model’s Proxies and Parameters Estimation 14 C. Results Analysis 16 V. Conclusions and Further Extension 17 Reference 19 Appendix A. Brief introductions for the selected four structural-form credit models 37 Tables Table 1. Parameters of the sample banks and the numerical analysis 24 Table 2. Changes of default probability when the flow-based model is included 25 Table 3. Integrated default probabilities changes by different setting 26 Table 4. Sensitive analysis of the correlation coefficient 27 Table 4. Sensitive analysis of the correlation coefficient (Cont.) 28 Table 5. Sensitive analysis of the mean-reverting speed parameter 29 Table 6. Sensitive analysis of the long-term level parameter 30 Table 7. Sensitive analysis of the standard deviation parameter 31 Table 8. Characteristics of the sample banks sorted by SIC codes 32 Table 9. The distribution of the stock-based model parameters of the sample banks 33 Table 10. The distribution of the flow-based model parameters of the sample banks 34 Table 11.Comparisons of 1-year default probabilities estimated by structural-form models 35 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.subject | 償付不能 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 流量基礎信用風險模型 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 存量基礎信用風險模型 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Stock-based Credit Model | en |
| dc.subject | Flow-based Insolvency | en |
| dc.subject | Flow-based Credit Model | en |
| dc.title | 整合存量與流量模型之結構型信用風險模型 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | An Integrated Structural form Credit Risk Model
---A Combination of Stock- and Flow-based Credit Risk Models | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 97-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 博士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 李阿乙,陳勝源,張焯然,王耀輝,何耕宇 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 存量基礎信用風險模型,流量基礎信用風險模型,償付不能, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Stock-based Credit Model,Flow-based Credit Model,Flow-based Insolvency, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 45 | |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2009-06-03 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 財務金融學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 財務金融學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-98-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 419.07 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。