請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/25794
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 蔡揚宗 | |
dc.contributor.author | Min-Huei Wang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 王敏慧 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T06:30:25Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2006-07-31 | |
dc.date.issued | 2006 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2006-07-24 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 一、中文部份
1. 王登應(1997),我國家電產業策略群組與績效關係之研究,國立台灣大學商學研究所碩士論文。 2. 林榮昌(2003),電子零組件通路商經營策略之個案研究,實踐大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。 3. 司徒達賢(1995),策略管理,台北遠流出版公司. 4. 吳思華(1984),產業特質與企業經營策略關係之研究,政治大學企業管理研究所博士論文。 5. 許士軍(1981),管理學,第十版,東華書局。 6. 張麗慧(1996),台灣地區飲料產業策略群組分析與移動障礙之研究,中正大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。 7. 吳堉文(2005),我國IC通路產業關鍵成功因素之研究,台灣大學會計研究所碩士論文。 8. 周資輔(2002),臺灣地區高科技產業股票報酬率之特性試探,交通大學高階主管管理學程碩士論文。 9. 胡秋江(1999),台灣半導體產品通路分析及發展趨勢研究,大葉大學事業經營研究所碩士論文。 10.陳冠宏(2003),我國上市及上櫃電子公司股票評價之研究--以盈餘及財務比率分析,東華大學公共行政研究所碩士論文。 11.統一證券(2005),IC通路商。 12.鄭瑞美(2001),股票報酬與財務比率關係之研究--總體經濟因素與產業別之影響,政治大學會計系碩士論文。 13.滕逸蕙(2004),國內上市銀行績效評估及與股價報酬率之研究,銘傳大學財務金融學系碩士在職專班碩士論文。 14.賴俊宇(2000),上櫃電子業經營績效分析─資料包絡分析法之應用,銘傳大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。 15.蔡山和(2003),我國半導體零組件通路業之關鍵成功因素研究,台北大學企業管理學系碩士在職專班碩士論文。 16.蔡靜卿(2000),資訊電子業超額股票報酬之探討,台灣科技大學管理研究所企業管理學程碩士論文。 17.謝淑慧(2000),健檢中心之經營策略與經營績效之探討-以平衡計分卡觀點分析,雲林科技大學工業工程與管理研究所碩士論文。 二、英文部份 1.Aaker, D. A. (1984), Strategic Market Management, NY:John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2.Andrews, K. (1971), 'The Concept of Corporate Strategy', Homewood, Illinois: Dow-Jones-Irwin. 3.Ansoff, H.I. (1965), Corporate Strategy, New York : McGraw-Hill. 4.Ansoff, H. I. and McDonnell, E. (1990), Implanting Strategic Management, 2th ed., Prentice-Hall (UK). 5.Barney, J. B., (1997), 'Gaining and Sustaining Competitive Advantage', Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 6.Carroll, C., Lewis, P. M. and Thomas, H. (1992), 'Developing competitive strategies in Retailing' , Long Range Planning , No.25: PP.81-88. 7.Caves, R.E. and Porter, M. E (1977), 'From Entry Barriers to Mobility Barrier:Conjectural Decisions and Contrived Deterrence to New Competition ', Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol.91, PP.242-259. 8.Chandler, A.D. Jr. (1962), “Strategy and Structure”, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 9.Cool, K. O., (1985), “Strategic Group Formation and Strategic Group Shifts: A Longitudinal Analysis of the U.S. Pharmaceutical Industry, 1963-1982,” Doctoral Dissertation, Graduate School of Business Administration, Purdue University. 10.Day, G.S., (1984), Strategic Market Planning : The Pursuit of Competitive Advantage, St. Paul, MN : West Publishing. 11.Dess, G. G., and Davis, P. S. (1984), Generic strategies as determinants of strategic group membership and organizational performance, Academy of Management Journal, No.27: 467-488. 12.Fama, E. F. (1980),Agency problems and the theory of firm,Journal of Political Economics,88(1),PP.288-307. 13.Fiegenbaum, A., McGee, J. and Thomas, H. (1987), “Exploring the Linkage between Strategic Groups and Competitive Strategy”, International Studies of Management & Organization, Vol.18, PP.6-25. 14.Glueck, W. F and Jauch, L. R. (1980), Business Policy and Strategic Management. New York : McGraw-Hill. 15.Hambrick, D.C., (1983), 'High Profit Strategies in Mature Capital Goods Industries: A Contingency Approach', Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 26, No. 4, 16.Hatten, K.J.,Schendel, D .E. and Cooper, A.C. 'Strategic Model of the US Brewing Industry : 1952-1971'. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 21, pp. 592-610, 1978. 17.Hatten, K.J. and M.L. Hatten, (1987), “Strategic Groups, Asymmetrical Mobility Barriers and Contestability”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.8, PP.329-342. 18.Hax, C.K. 'Redefining the Concept of Strategy and the Strategy Formation Process'. Engineering Management Review, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 19-24, 1991 19.Hofer, C.W. and Schendel, D. (1978), “Strategy Formation: Analytical Concepts”, St. Paul: West. 20.Holmstrom, J. (1998),Implementing vendor-managed inventory the efficient way,Production and Inventory Management Journal,Vol.39,No.3,PP.1 - 5. 21.Hunt, M., (1972), 'Competition in the Major Home Appliance Industry', 1960-1970, Doctoral Dissertation, Graduation School of Business Administration, Harvard University. 22.Kolter, P., Ang, S.W., Leong, S .M. and Tan, C.T. (1999),Marketing Management-An Asian Perspective,Prentice Hall. 23.Leidecker, J.K. and Bruno, A.V.(1984), Identifying and using critical success factors, Long Range Planning, Vol.17,P.26. 24.Mascarenhas, B. and Aaker, D.A. (1989), “ Mobility Barries and Strategic Groups”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.10, PP.475-485 25.McGee, J. and Thomas, H. (1986),'Strategic Groups: Theory, Research and Taxonomy'. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 7, No. 2, PP. 141-160, 26.Mintzberg, H. (1978), “ Patterns in strategy formation ” Management Science, Vol. 24, No. 1, PP.934-948 27.Newman, W. H. and Logan J. P (1971), Strategy, Policy and Control Management, Cincinnati: South-Western Publishing Co. 28.Nohria, N. and Garcia-Pont, C. (1991), 'Global Strategic Linkages and industry Structure', Strategic Management Journal. 29.Olusoga, S. A., Mokwa, M. P. and Noble, C.H. (1995), ' Strategic Groups, Mobility Barriers, and Competitive Advantage: An Empirical Investigation ', Journal of Business Research, Vol.33, 1995, PP.153-164. 30.Porter, M. E. (1980), “Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors”, New York: Free Press. 31.Peteraf, M. and Shanley, M. (1997), “Getting to Know You : A Theory of Strategic Group Identity” Strategic Management Journal, Vol.18, NO. Special Issue Supplement, 1997, PP.165-186. 32.PricewaterhouseCoopers(PwC)(2001),Value reporting forecast:2001 best practice example,中文摘譯:企業價值報告趨勢預測,資誠教育基金會(2001). 33.Quinn, J.B. (1980), Strategies for Change: Logical Incremental, Homewood, Ill : Irwin,. 34.Robbins, S. P. (1990), Organization Theory, Prentice-Hall International Editions, 3rd ed. 35.Rockart, J.F. (1979),Chief executives define their own date needs,Harvard Business Review,pp.81~93. 36.Reger, R.K. and A.S. Huff, “Strategic Groups : A Cognitive Perspective”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 14, 1993, pp.103-124 37.Sabath, R. E., Autry, C. W. and Daugherty, P.J. (2001),Automatic replenishment programs,Journal of Business Logistics,Vol.22,No.1. 38.Shoop, C. B. and Whitmore, C.(2004),Electronics Distribution,Deutsche Bank. 39.Stank, T. P, Keller, S. B. and Daugherty, P. J. (2001),Supply chain collaboration and logistical service performance,Journal of Business Logistics,Vol.22,No.1. 40.Steiner, G. A. and Miner, J. B. (1977). Management Policy and strategy : Text, Readings and Cases. New York : Macmillan. 41.Stern, L.W., El-Ansary, A.I. and Coughlan, A.T. (1996),Marketing Channels, 5th ed., Prentice Hall,中譯本:翁景明與胡同來(2002)譯,華泰書局. 42.Sudharshan (1995). Marketing Strategy: Relationships, Offerings, Timing and Resource Allocation. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall 43.Thompson, A. A. & Strickland III, Jr. A. J. (2001), Strategic Management,12th ed.,McGraw-Hill/Irwin. 44.Waller, M., Eric J.M. and Davis, T. (1998),Vendor-managed inventory in the retail supply chain,Journal of Business Logistics,Vol. 20,No. 1. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/25794 | - |
dc.description.abstract | IC通路商掛牌者眾,儼然成為證券市場中一個龐大的族群,但各家之營運成效卻是良莠不齊,為了持續追求營運規模的成長,通路商透過積極的整併合作、或以合組控股公司的經營模式發展,一方面擴大營收規模,另方面減少產業間的同業競爭。
除合併策略外,通路商亦發展專業化與差異化的服務,以區隔不同屬性之市場,透過滿足客戶之需求,提昇通路商之高附加價值。另一類利基型廠商之策略模式即是靠著提昇技術能力,積極參與客戶產品的設計開發,進而爭取較高毛利與掌握未來市場發展動向,以維持企業本身優勢與競爭力! 本研究由理論與文獻探討出發,配合企業經營績效的衡量指標,歸屬出屬於本產業之不同策略群組,進而延伸市場對不同策略模式產生相對應之市場評價,再搭配實務經驗應證,歸納整理出IC通路產業的策略模式、經營績效與資本市場評價之關連性。得出主要結論如下:台灣IC通路商產品可以分為三大策略群組,分別為「高報酬追求型」、「深耕技術利基型」與「規模及市占率追求型」。 資本市場對於「高報酬追求型」群組內的公司給予最高的評價。「高報酬追求型」群組的核心策略邏輯在於以其所代理的產品為核心,積極強化與原廠的關係或與原廠共組合資公司,共同經營市場;或自原廠尋求技術移轉,跨入製造領域,以原廠為母廠技術來源;又或與原廠維持良好關係,並成為其全系列、獨家代理商,以獲取較高利潤。 「深耕技術利基型」群組的核心策略邏輯在於尋找特殊型或利基型產品的代理權,並且輔以龐大且堅強的技術支援人力(FAE)、深度且早期的參與客戶的設計流程,獲取較高的毛利率。「規模及市占率追求型」群組的核心策略邏輯則在於期待規模極大化必將產生規模經濟的效益,進而增加通路商在產業鍊中的地位及議價能力,以求反映在獲利能力上,但資本市場則對本群組仍持保留的態度。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | With more IC distributors listed on the stock market, more people are becoming aware of this industry. However, the operating performance of each IC distributor is not exactly the same. Either by mergers or acquisitions, IC distributors are able to make big revenue growth and reduce the competition among rival firms. The professional and unique services are emphasized by some IC distributors to meet customers’ needs and provide them with more value-added services. Another business model is based on the niche market. To pursue high profits and get involved in customers’ design projects are highlighted by this model.
This research categorizes Taiwan listed IC distributors into three strategy groups by using public information from listed company data base, with the theoretical supports from the related researches over past years. We conclude the capital market favors “Profit –Oriented Group” most due to the impressive profitability and strong growth momentum; furthermore, the research implies several practical and operational strategies to the industrial players. The “Profit-Oriented Group” - Most favored by capital markets - Close tie-up with principals either by technology transfer to form up a JV - Or gaining the exclusive dealership The “Niche-market Group” - Gaining unique or niche product lines - Strong FAE technical support - Early-involvement into customers’ design projects The “Economy-of-scale and market share oriented Group” - Operational efficiencies by leveraging scale - Enhancing bargaining power through scale-up - Strengthening compositeness in the value chain | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T06:30:25Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-95-P93744005-1.pdf: 1543324 bytes, checksum: a2d5710e60c088e3655db77161b20568 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2006 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論............................................01
第一節 研究背景........................................01 第二節 研究動機與目的..................................05 第三節 預期研究貢獻....................................07 第四節 研究架構........................................08 第二章 文獻探討........................................10 第一節 策略與策略群組..................................10 第二節 關鍵成功因素與經營績效..........................24 第三節 通路商的功能與價值..............................37 第四節 小結............................................45 第三章 研究方法........................................46 第一節 研究假說........................................46 第二節 研究期間、資料來源與樣本選取....................48 第三節 研究方法與流程..................................50 第四章 產業分析........................................52 第一節 全球產業規模....................................52 第二節 全球產業現況....................................56 第三節 產業特性........................................60 第四節 產業發展趨勢....................................62 第五節 通路產業之關鍵成功因素..........................70 第六節 台灣IC通路產業現況..............................76 第五章 策略群組分析....................................86 第一節 策略群組分類....................................86 第二節 策略群組類型....................................92 第三節 策略群組與股價.................................101 第六章 結論與建議.....................................105 第一節 研究結論.......................................105 第二節 研究建議.......................................107 第三節 研究限制.......................................110 參考文獻 ...............................................111 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 企業策略群組與資本市場評價關係探討
--以台灣上市櫃IC通路商為例 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Study on the Relationship between Strategy Groups and Capital Market
—A Case of Taiwan Listed IC distributors | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 94-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 游張松,葉疏 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 策略群組,IC通路, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Strategy Group,IC Distributors, | en |
dc.relation.page | 117 | |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2006-07-26 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 會計與管理決策組 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 會計與管理決策組 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-95-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.51 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。