大學入學考試地理資訊試題分析

Fang-Yu Lin; 林芳瑜

請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件： http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/25687

完整後設資料紀錄

DC 欄位	值	語言
dc.contributor.advisor	賴進貴(Jinn-Guey Lay)
dc.contributor.author	Fang-Yu Lin	en
dc.contributor.author	林芳瑜	zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned	2021-06-08T06:24:50Z	-
dc.date.copyright	2006-07-31
dc.date.issued	2006
dc.date.submitted	2006-07-28
dc.identifier.citation	一、中文部分 1.王淑芬（2001）高中地理教師地理資訊能力之研究，國立臺灣大學地理環境資源學研究所碩士論文。 2.王文中、呂金燮等合著（1999）教育測驗與評量：教室學習觀點，台北市：五南。 3.王立行（1993）大學入學考試的角色定位與屬性分析，選才，3（6）：57-61。 4.司琦（1989）課程導論，台北：五南。 5.李明燕（2002）九十一學年度指定科目考試地理科試題分析，大學入學考試中心。 6.李明燕等（2003）九十二學年度指定科目考試地理科試題分析，大學入學考試中心。 7.李茂興譯、陳淑美審訂（2002）教育測驗與評量，台北市：學富。 8.余民寧（1997）教育測驗與評量：成就測驗與教學評量，台北市：心理。 9.施保旭（1995）地理資訊系統概論，臺北：儒林。 10.張春興（1994）教育心理學，台北市：正大印書館。 11.教育部（1995）高級中學選修科目地理課程標準，台北：教育部。 12.教育部（2005）普通高級中學必修科目地理課程綱要，台北：教育部。 13.郭生玉（1997）心理與教育測驗，台北市：精華。 14.陳林曉梅（2000）大學「甄選入學」制度之研究（1993-2000），國立台東師範學院教育研究所碩士論文。 15.陳國彥（1999）台灣高中地理教育的現在與未來，香港地理人， 15(3)，取自http://www.hkga.org/publish/hkgeo/vol_152/v152_03.htm。 16.許珊瑜（2006）九十四學年度指定科目考試試題分析—地理考科，大學入學考試中心。 17.張怡玲、姚正萍、彭婉如、謝政達（2002）九十一學年度學科能力測驗試題分析—社會考科，大學入學考試中心。 18.賀忠儒（1988）地理教學與地圖應用：以高中本國地理教科書為例，中等教育，39（2）：96-100。 19.黃光雄（1982）認知領域教育目標分類，台北市：復文圖書出版社。 20.葉連祺（2000）教師自編紙筆式測驗試題類型之探討，研習資訊，17（4）：42-53。 21.詹志禹（1996）評量改革為什麼要進行-回應吳毓瑩「評量的蛻變與突破」，教育資料與研究，13：45-47。 22.楊幸雪、管美蓉、謝政達（2003）九十二學年度學科能力測驗試題分析—社會考科，大學入學考試中心。 23.廖葆禎（2003）網路數位地圖的使用與教育，國立彰化師範大學地理學系研究所碩士論文。 24.鄭秋霞（2002）從教育改革談台灣地區大學入學制度之變革（1994-迄今），南華大學公共行政與政策研究所碩士論文。 25.賴進貴（1999）中小學生地圖認知之研究，地圖，10：49-58。 26.賴進貴（1998）地理資訊系統在中小學教育之應用研究，第三屆中華地理資訊學會研討會，成功大學。二、西文部分 1.AAG, AGS, NCGE, NGS (1994) Geography for Life, National Geography Standards. 2.Airasian, P. W. & Miranda, H. (2002) The role of assessment in the revised Bloom’s taxonomy, Theory into Practice, 41(4): 349-354. 3.Anderson, W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001) A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Blooms’ educational objectives, New York, NY: Longman. 4.Anderson, W. (2002) Curricular alignment: a re-examination. Theoryinto Practice,41(4): 255-259. 5.Baker, T. R. and Case, S. B. (2003) GIS in K-12 science education, Twenty-third Annual ESRI International User Conference. 6.Bennett, J. (2001) Practical work at the upper high school level: the evaluation of a new model of assessment. International Journal of Science Education, 23(1): 97-110. 7.Benson, M. J., & Sporakowski, M. J. (1992) Writing reviews of family literature: Guiding students using revised Bloom’s taxonomy of cognitive, FamilyRelations, 41(1): 65-69. 8.Bloom, B. S. et al. (1956) Taxonomy of educational objectives, Handbook I. N. Y.: David Mckay. 9.Chase, C. I. (1978) Measurement for educational evaluation (2nd ed.), Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. 10.Chyung, S. Y., & Stepich, D. (2003) Applying the “congruence” principle of Bloom’s taxonomy to designing online instruction. The Quarterly of Distance Education, 4(3): 317-330. 11.David, A. (2002a) A framework relating outcomes based education and the taxonomy of educational objectives, Studies in Educational Evaluation, 28(1): 35-59. 12.David, A. (2002b) Implications and applications of modern test theory in the context of outcomes based education, Studies in Educational Evaluation, 28(2): 103-121. 13.Dunn, C. E and Atkins, P. J. and Blakemore, M. J and Townsend, J. G. (1999) Teaching Geographical Information Handling Skills for Lower-income Countries, Transactions in GIS, 3(4): 319-332. 14.Ebel, R. L., & Frisbie, D. A. (1991) Essentials of educational measurement (5th ed.), Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. 15.Ebel, R. L. (1967) The relation of item discrimination to test reliability, Journal of Educational Measurement, 4: 125-128. 16.ESRI (2002) Guidelines for Developing a Successful and Sustainable Higher Education GIS Program, ESRI White Paper. 17.Frisbie, D. A., Miranda, D. U., & Baker, K. K. (1993) An evaluation of elementary textbook tests as classroom assessment tools, Applied Measurement in Education, 6(1): 21-36. 18.Goodchild, Michael F. (1999) Future Directions in Geographic Information Science, Geographic Information Sciences, 5(1):1-8. 19.Hoff, D. J. (2001) Teaching, standards, tests found not aligned, Education Week, 21(9): 6. 20.Hopkins, K. D. (1998) Educational and psychological measurement and evaluation. 21.James, R. (2002) Improving instruction, Theory Into Practice, 41(4): 233-237. 22.Karns, J. M. L., Burton, G. E., & Martin, G.D. (2001) Learning objectives and testing: An analysis of six principles of economics textbooks, using Bloom’s taxonomy, The Journal of Economic Education, 16-20. 23.Kastberg, S. E. (2003) Using Bloom’s taxonomy as a framework for classroom assessment, Mathematics Teacher, 96(6): 402-407. 24.Kibler, R.J., Cegala, D.J., Miles, D.T. & Barker,L.L. (1974) Objectives for instruction and evaluation, Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon. 25.Krathwohl, D. R. (2002) A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview, Theory Into Practice, 41(4): 212-218. 26.Martin C. D. (2003) Professional issues: Computing curricula 2001: reverse engineering a computer science curriculum (Part 2), ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 35(2): 9-10. 27.Martin, D. (1996) Geographic information systems: socioeconomic applications, New York and London: Routledge. 28.Mayer, R. E. (2002) A taxonomy for computer-based assessment of problem solving, Computers in Human Behavior, 18(6): 623-632. 29.Shulman, L. S. (2002) Making differences, Theory Into Practice, 34(6): 36-44. 30.Squire, P. J. (2001) Cognitive levels of testing agricultural science in senior secondary schools in Botswana, Education, 121(3): 597-603. 31.Sui ,Daniel Z. (1995) A Pedagogic Framework to Link GIS to the Intellectual Core of Geography, Journal of Geography, 94(6): 578-591. 32.Wallace, M. H. and Walker, C. S. (2002) Teaching Undergraduate Earth Science Using GIS: Earthquakes, Volcanoes, Tsunamis, Oh My!, ArcNews, from http://www.esri.com/news/arcnews/summer02articles/earthquak es.html. [10 June 2006]
dc.identifier.uri	http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/25687	-
dc.description.abstract	自民國88年開始實施的高中地理新課程，高三上學期選修地理的課程有60％的內容與地理資訊有關，而95年新課程更將地理資訊納入高一課程。面臨資訊時代來臨及國際競爭，高中學生的地理資訊技能是未來公民的基本素養，然而相關研究尚不普遍。地理資訊在課程上的重視也反映在入學考試上，近幾年來，地理資訊試題陸續見於入學考試的地理科上。現行大學多元入學考試測驗目標在於檢測考生應具備的學科知識，以及對於資料的閱讀、判斷等能力，推理、分析等思考能力，表達能力及學科知識的應用能力。而地理資訊試題是否能適切地反應教學目標和教材內容，達到真正檢驗學生是否具備「地理資訊」的能力？本研究以近年大學入學考試中心的測驗結果為素材，探討地理資訊受重視的情形、學生的認知成就、試題的適切性以及教學可提升之處。本研究從相關大學入學考試中挑選出地理資訊相關試題，針對題目內涵及作答情形進行統計分析，探討地理資訊類試題之比重、通過率、鑑別度與概念的配置情況。研究結果顯示地理資訊試題的通過率與鑑別度均略高於整體試題平均，然無顯著差異。透過個別試題的選項分析，本研究進一步找出教學難點、迷思概念，並提出高中地理資訊教學之相關建議。	zh_TW
dc.description.abstract	Facing the information era and increasing international competitions, the proficiency of geographic information of senior high school students is a fundamental quality of future citizens. Yet, such issues have not attracted much research interest. This research uses the test result of College Entrance Examination as material to explore the ratios, accomplishment of students, and adequacy of questions related geographic information subjects. We first identified and selected questions related to geographical information from the questions sheets. The difficulty, discrimination, and distribution of items of these selected questions were further analyzed. The results of such analysis indicate that the difficulty and discrimination of the questions are slightly higher than the average while not significant statistically. Based on analysis of individual questions, we further identified the difficult concept and myths of geographic information subject and made suggestions to high schools geography education.	en
dc.description.provenance	Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T06:24:50Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-95-R92228020-1.pdf: 2777689 bytes, checksum: a7dc7b3a1f7c3755b97c484cea08c8f7 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2006	en
dc.description.tableofcontents	第一章緒論...............................................1 第一節研究背景與動機.................................. 1 第二節研究目的........................................ 3 第三節研究範圍與限制.................................. 4 第二章文獻回顧.......................................... 5 第一節大學入學考試.................................... 5 第二節地理資訊與高中地理教育......................... 16 第三節試題分析與命題原則............................. 26 第四節布魯姆認知分類................................. 37 第三章研究方法......................................... 44 第一節研究對象與問題................................. 44 第二節研究方法....................................... 44 第三節研究步驟....................................... 45 第四節研究架構與流程................................. 45 第四章研究成果......................................... 47 第一節地理資訊試題的比重與分配....................... 47 第二節難易度與鑑別度分析............................. 50 第三節選項分析....................................... 54 第四節試題知識類型與認知歷程分布情形................. 56 第五節地理資訊試題各概念比較......................... 58 第六節個別試題分析................................... 60 第五章結論與建議....................................... 82 第一節結論........................................... 82 第二節建議........................................... 83 參考文獻................................................ 85 附錄................................................... 90
dc.language.iso	zh-TW
dc.subject	地理	zh_TW
dc.subject	測驗分析	zh_TW
dc.subject	資訊	zh_TW
dc.subject	地理	zh_TW
dc.subject	教育	zh_TW
dc.subject	Geographic Education	en
dc.subject	Test Analysis	en
dc.subject	Geographical Information	en
dc.title	大學入學考試地理資訊試題分析	zh_TW
dc.title	A Study on the Geographic Information Exam Questions of the College Entrance Examination	en
dc.type	Thesis
dc.date.schoolyear	94-2
dc.description.degree	碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee	孫志鴻(Chin-Hong Sun),陳哲銘(Che-Ming Chen)
dc.subject.keyword	地理,教育,地理,資訊,測驗分析,	zh_TW
dc.subject.keyword	Geographic Education,Geographical Information,Test Analysis,	en
dc.relation.page	109
dc.rights.note	未授權
dc.date.accepted	2006-07-29
dc.contributor.author-college	理學院	zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept	地理環境資源學研究所	zh_TW
顯示於系所單位：	地理環境資源學系

文件中的檔案：

檔案	大小	格式
ntu-95-1.pdf 未授權公開取用	2.71 MB	Adobe PDF

顯示文件簡單紀錄

系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。