Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 管理學院
  3. 商學研究所
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/25589
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor戚樹誠(Shu-cheng Chi)
dc.contributor.authorChia-Ling Wuen
dc.contributor.author吳嘉齡zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-08T06:20:06Z-
dc.date.copyright2006-09-20
dc.date.issued2006
dc.date.submitted2006-09-11
dc.identifier.citation曾正文(1990),消費者對服務品質的期待程度與滿意程度之研究─以電腦門市為例,國立中正大學企業管理研究所
徐玉燕(2002),消費者特徵、企業形象與服務品質對購買決策影響之研究—以台灣地區不同零售業態加以實證,中國文化大學國際企業管理研究所
林明輝(2002),服務品質知覺公平顧客滿意與購後意願之相關性研究-以花蓮地區3C零售業為例,國立東華大學企業管理學系
Ackerman, R., Coleman, R., Leger, E. & Macdorman, J.(1988). “Process Quality Management & Improvement guidelines.” Indiana-polis, IN:Publication Center, AT&T Bell Laboratories. 1988
Baumeister, R.F.(1982),” A Self-Presentational View of Social Phenomena,” Psychological Bulleitn, 91,pp.3-26
Brown, Steven P, Peterson, Robert A.( 1994),” The effect of effort on sales performance and job satisfaction” Journal of Marketing, 58, 2, 70 - 80
Campbell,(1970),” Managerial behavior performance and effectiveness”. New York: McGraw-Hill
Churchill Gilber & Surprenant, Carol(1982), “An Investigation into the Determinants of Consumer Satisfaction”, Journal of Marketing Research, 19, 491-504
Christie, Richard and Florence L, Geis(1970),”Studies in Machiavellianism”, New York: Academic Press
Dubinsky, Alan J.(1978),”A Call for Action:Students’ Assemssments of Personal Silling,”paper presented at the Mild-west Business Administration Association Conference, Chicago
Erving Goffman(1959), “The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life”. New York: Doubleday, 208-212
Garvin, David A.(1984), “What Does Product Quality Really Mean,” Sloan Management Review, 25-43
Gemmill, Gary R. and W. H. Heister(1972),”Machiavellianism as a Factor in Managerial Job Strain, Job satisfaction, and Upward Mobility,” Academy of Management Journal ,15,51-62
Harris, Clyde E., Jr. and Rosann L. Spiro(1981)”Training implications of Salesperson Influence Strategy,” Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management,10-17
Hoppock, R.(1935), “Job Satisfaction”. New York: Harper and Row. P.271.
James Ricks and John Fraedrich(1999),”The Paradox of Machiavellianism: Machiavellian May Make for Productive Sales but Poor Management Reviews”, Journal of Business Ehtics 20, 197-205
John R. Sparks(1994), ”Machiavellianism and Personal Success in marketing: The Moderating Role of Latitude for Improvisation”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 22, 4, 393-400
Klein, Stuart M, and Richard R. Ritti(1984), Understanding Organizational Behavior, Boston, Mass:Kent Publishing Co., 156-178
Kotler, Philip(1988), “Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning, Implementation, and Control”, 6thed,” Prentice-Hall,p.477*.
M.C. Bolino, W.H. Turnley (2003),” More Than One Way to Make an Impression:Exploring Profiles of Impression Management”, Journal of Management 29, 2, 141–160
Michael Levy and Arun Sharma(1993)”Relationships Among Measures of Retail Salesperson Performance”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science , 21, 3, 231-238
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A. & Berry, L. L.( 1985), “SERVOUAL: A Multiple – Item Scale for Mearsuing Consumer Perception of Service Quality,” Journal of marketing, 64,13-40
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A. & Berry, L. L.(1985), “A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research” Journal of marketing, 49, 41-50.
Quinn, R.P., & Stainess, G.L. (1979). The 1977 quality of employment survey. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Survey Research Center, Institute for SocialResearch
Robbins, and Gibson, J.L.(1991),”Organizational behavior structure”,
7thed.,p.111.
Ronald H. King and Martha B. Booze(1986)”Sales Training and Impression Management”, The Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 6, 2, 51-60
Shelby D. hunt and Lawrence B. Chonko (1984),”marketing and Machiavellianism”, Journal of Marketing; .48,30-42
Shultz, J. S.(1993)”Situational and dispositional predeictions fo performance:A test fo the hypothesized X structure interaction among sales persons”, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 478-498
Siu, Wai-sum, Tam, Kam-chuen.( 1995) “Machiavellianism and Chinese banking executives in Hong Kong”, The International Journal of Bank Marketing. Bradford:13, 2, 15 -21
Singhapakdi, Anusorn.(1993) “Ethical perceptions of marketers: The interaction effects of Machiavellianism and organizational ethical culture”, Journal of Business Ethics., 12, 5, 407-418
Sujan, Harish, Weitz, Barton A, Kumar, Nirmalya.(1994) ” Learning Orientation, Working Smart, Effective Selling”, Journal of Marketing, 58, 3, 39-52
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/25589-
dc.description.abstract回顧過去研究,對於銷售人員的人格特質與其各方面成功如:銷售績效、個人所得及工作滿足等之間都有討論,然而馬基維利傾向卻是較少被人討論的人格特質,雖然在國外已有學者針對此議題作探討,但是國家不同、產業不同所做出來的結果有可能異。
本研究以國內眼鏡連鎖產業銷售人員及顧客為研究對象,共152位受試者,針對銷售人員之馬基維利傾向與服務品質、工作滿足之間的關聯性做探討,研究結果顯示馬基維利傾向與前者呈顯著負相關,但與後者則之間的相關性則不存在。此外本研究再以印象管理及勤奮工作作為干擾因子,以探討此二變項對於馬基維利傾向與銷售業績之間關連性的干擾效果,研究結果顯示,勤奮工作對於馬基維利傾向與銷售業績之間具有干擾效果,但印象管理則否。而考慮三因子之間的交互作用時,則假設成立,即當銷售人員越勤奮工作且具有較佳之印象管理時,則馬基維利傾向與銷售業績的負關聯性將越弱。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractIn the past literature, there have been discussions of the relationships between salespeople’s personalities and sales successes in many aspects, e.g., sales performance, personal income, and job satisfaction. The literature, however, has neglected the trait of Machiavellianism. Also, findings from the Western literature on Machiavellianism may be different from those in Taiwan.
The sample of the present research includes 82 glasses chain industry’s salespeople and 82 clients. It is aimed at examining relationships among salespeople’s Machiavellianism, impression management, hard work, and sales performance, service quality and job satisfaction. The result showed Machiavellianism and service quality are positively related, but no relationship was found between Machiavellianism and job satisfaction. I also found hard work exerted the moderating effect on the relationship between Machiavellianism and sales performance, but impression management did not. That is, when salespeople worked hard, plus if they had better impression management, then the negative relationship between Machiavellianism and sales performance became weak.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T06:20:06Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-95-R93741033-1.pdf: 441520 bytes, checksum: 1c4308c6da13e61669cd9d55e920dfcf (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2006
en
dc.description.tableofcontents論文摘要………………………………………………………………………I
目錄…………………………………………………………………………..III
表次…………………………………………………………………………..IV
圖次…………………………………………………………………………..V
第一章 緒論…………………………………………………………………1
第一節 研究動機……………………………………………………………………1
第二節 研究目的……………………………………………………………………3
第二章 文獻回顧……………………………………………………………4
第一節 馬基維利傾向………………………………………………………………4
第二節 印象管理……………………………………………………………………8
第三節 勤奮工作…………………………………………………………………..11
第四節 服務品質…………………………………………………………………..11
第五節 工作滿足…………………………………………………………………..12
第三章 研究架構及方法……………………………………………..……14
第一節 研究架構及假說………………………………………………………….14
第二節 研究對象…………………………………………………………………..16
第三節 研究流程…………………………………………………………………..17
第四節 研究變數之測量…………………………………………………………..17
第五節 統計分析…………………………………………………………………..27
第四章 研究結果…………………………………………………………..22
第一節 敍述統計…………………………………………………………………..22
第二節 因數分析與信度分析……………………………………………………..23
第三節 相關分析…………………………………………………………………..27
第四節 階層迴歸分析……………………………………………………………..30
第五章 結論與建議………………………………………………………..36
第一節 結論………………………………………………………………………..36
第二節 研究限制…………………………………………………………………..38
第三節 管理意涵……………………………………………………………….….39
附錄……………………….………………………………………………..40
附錄一 The Mach IV Scale(馬基維利傾向量表)………………..………………..40
附錄二 勤奮工作量表……………………………………………………………..41
附錄三 服務品質量表……………………………………………………………..41
附錄四 印象管理量表……………………………………………………………..42
附錄五 背景資料…………………………………………………………………..43
參考文獻……………………………………………………………………..44

表次
表4-1:各項變數平均數-以性別為區隔……………………………. …. 22
表4-2:馬基維利傾向之信度與因素負荷量表…………………………….24
表4-3:印象管理之信度與因素負荷量表……………………………. …. 25
表4-4:勤奮工作之信度與因素負荷量表……………………………. …. 25
表4-5:工作滿足之信度與因素負荷量表……………………………. …. 26
表4-6:服務品質之信度與因素負荷量表……………………………. …. 26
表4-7:各變數之平均數、標準差及相關係數…………………………….29
表4-8:迴歸分析表-銷售業績……………………………. …. …. …. …. 32
表4-9:迴歸分析表-服務品質……………………………. …. …. …. …. 33
表4-10:迴歸分析表-工作滿足……………………………. …. …. …. ….35

圖次
圖4-1:勤奮工作程度高低的干擾效果………………………………. …. 31
圖4-2:三因子交互作用…………………………………………………….32
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.title銷售人員之馬基維利傾向與銷售績效的關係:探討印象管理與勤奮工作的干擾效果zh_TW
dc.titleThe Relationship between Machiavellianism and Sales Performance of Salespeople:Exploring the Moderating Effect of Impression Management and Hard Worken
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear94-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee諸承明(Cheng- Ming Zhu),羅新興(Hsin-Hsin Lo)
dc.subject.keyword馬基維利傾向,印象管理,勤奮工作,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordMachiavellianism,Impression Management,Working Hard,en
dc.relation.page47
dc.rights.note未授權
dc.date.accepted2006-09-12
dc.contributor.author-college管理學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept商學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:商學研究所

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-95-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
431.17 kBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved