請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/25512完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 郭瑞祥,任立中 | |
| dc.contributor.author | I-Hsuan Chiu | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 邱奕瑄 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T06:16:35Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2007-02-05 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2007 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2007-01-26 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 1. 傅振瑞(1997),「資訊負荷、情緒對消費者決策效果的實驗室研究」,國立中央大學資訊管理學系碩士論文。
2. 高震宇(2005),「認知資訊超載對消費者線上購物決策之影響」,東吳大學商學院企業管理學系碩士論文。 3. 劉世南譯(2004),「選擇的弔詭」,台北:天下雜誌出版。(原書:Schwartz, Barry (2003), The Paradox of Choice: Why More is Less, New York: HarperCollins Publishers.) 4. Bettman, J. R. (1979), An Information Processing Theory of Consumer Choice, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company. 5. Bettman, J. R., E. J. Johnson and J. W. Payne (1991), “Consumer Decision Making,” Handbook of Consumer Behavior pp.50-84, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc. 6. Butcher, H. (1998), Meeting managers’ information needs, London: Aslib. 7. Carroall, J. D. and P. E. Green (1995), “Psychometric Methods in Marketing Research: Part Ⅰ, Conjoint Analysis,” Journal of Marketing Research, 32, 4, pp.385-391. 8. Cattin, P. and D. R. Wittink (1989), “Commercial Use of Conjoint Analysis: An Update”, Journal of Marketing, 53, pp.91-96. 9. Cattin, P. and D. R. Wittink (1989), “Commercial Use of Conjoint Analysis: A Survey,” Journal of Marketing, 46, pp. 44-53. 10. Davis, G. B. and M. H. Olson (1994), Management Information Systems:Conceptual Foundations, Structure, and Development, pp.303-310. 11. Dellaert, B. G. C., J. D. Brazell and J. J. Louvier E. (1999), “The Effect of Attribute Variation on Consumer Choice Consistency,” Marketing Letters, 10, 2, pp.139-147. 12. Dhar, R., S. M. Nowlis and S. J. Sherman (1999), “Comparison Effects on Preference Construction,” Journal of Consumer Research, 26, 3, pp.293-306. 13. Green, P. E. and V. Srinivasan (1978), “Conjoint Analysis in Consumer Research: Issues and Outlook,” Journal of Consumer Research, 5, 2, pp.103-123. 14. Green, P. E. and V. Srinivasan (1990), “Conjoint Analysis in Marketing: New Developments with Implications for Research and Pratice,” Journal of Marketing, 54, 4, pp.3-17. 15. Edmunds, A., and A. Morris (2000), “The problem of information overload in business organizations: a review of the literature,” International Journal of Information Management, 20, pp.17-28. 16. Green, P. E., A. M. Krieger and Y. Wind (2001), “Thirty Years of Conjoint Analysis: Reflections and Prospects,” Interfaces, 31, 3, pp.56-73. 17. Jacoby, J. (1984), “Perspectives on Information Overload,” Journal of Consumer Research, 10, 4, pp.432-435. 18. Jacoby, J., D. E. Speller, and C. A. Kohn (1974), “Brand Choice Behavior as a Function of Information Load,” Journal of Marketing Research, 11, pp.63-69. 19. Jacoby, J., D. E. Speller, and C. A. Kohn (1974), “Brand Choice Behavior as a Function of Information Load: Replication and Extension,” Journal of Consumer Research, 1, pp.33-42. 20. Keller, K. L. and R. Staelin (1987), “Effects of Quality and Quantity of Information on Decision Effectiveness,” Journal of Consumer Research, 14, pp.200-213. 21. Leigh, T. W., D. B. MacKay and J. O. Summers (1984), “Reliability and Validity of Conjoint Analysis and Self-Explicated Weights: A Comparison,” Journal of Marketing Research, 21,4 pp.456-462. 22. Lurie, N. H. (2004), “Decision Making in Information-Rich Environments: the Role of Information Structure,” Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 4, pp.473-486. 23. Malhotra, N. K., A. K. Jain, and S. W. Lagakos (1982), “The Information Overload Controversy: an Alternative Viewpoint,” Journal of Marketing, 46, pp.27-37. 24. McGuire, W. J. (1976), “Some Internal Psychological Factors Influencing Consumer Choice,” Journal of Consumer Research, 2, 4, pp.302-319. 25. Montgomery, H. and O. Scenson (1989), Process and Structure in Human Decision Making, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.. 26. Muthukrishnan A. V. and F. R. Kardes (2001), “Persistent Preferences for Product Attributes: the Effects of the Initial Choice Context and Inonformative Experience,” Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 1, pp.89-104. 27. Olshavsky, R. W. and F. Actio (1980), “An Information Processing Probe Into Conjoint Analysis,” Decision Science, 11, pp.451-470. 28. Payne, J. W., J. R. Bettman and E. J. Johnson (1993), The Adaptive Decision Maker, Cambridge University Press. 29. Pullman, M. E., K. J. Dodson and W. L. Moore (1999), “A Comparison of Conjoint Methods When There Are Many Attributes,” Marketing Letters, 10, 2, pp. 125-138. 30. Rao, V. R. (2004), “Comments on Conjoint Analysis with Partial Profiles,” Journal of Marketing Research, 41,4 pp.388-389. 31. Rubin, D. B. (2004), “Design and Modeling in Conjoint Analysis with Partial Profiles,” Journal of Marketing Research, 41,4 pp.390-391. 32. Russo, J. E. (1974), “More Information Is Better: a Reevaluation of Jacoby,” Journal of Consumer Research, 1, pp.68-72. 33. Schroder, H. M., M. J. Driver, and S. Streufert (1967), Human Information Processing, Holt, Rinehart and Winston. 34. Summers, J. O. (1974), “Less information is better?” Journal of Marketing Research, 11, 4, pp.467-468. 35. Weber, E. U., J. Baron and G. Loomes (2001), Conflict and Tradeoffs in Decision Making, Cambridge University Press. 36. Wilkie, W. L. (1974), “Analysis of Effects on Information Load,” Journal of Marketing Research, 11, 4, pp.462-466. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/25512 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 近幾年隨著網路發展,資訊流通快速,消費者能夠以較低之成本搜尋、獲得決策相關資訊,因此環境能夠提供之資訊勢必影響消費者的選擇。本研究擬由資訊處理之觀點,利用聯合分析法進行問卷資料收集,探討屬性呈現方式對於消費者決策過程中偏好評估之影響。本研究有以下發現:
1. 屬性呈現方式由繁入簡會比由簡入繁得到較為顯著之偏好結構。 在探討模式預測偏好係數之顯著性方面,發現當呈現方式係為由繁入簡時,預測模式可藉此增進對受測者對各屬性偏好估計之能力。而在探討各模式預測受測者對整體產品組合之偏好時,亦發現一次提供所有考量屬性之資訊供受測者評估,可使消費者較能清楚評估自己的偏好做出決定,模式預測能力亦提升。 2. 越後面呈現之題目所收集到的資料,其所建構出之模式越能準確估計受測者偏好 觀察屬性呈現順序不同對受測者各偏好評估之影響,屬性個數較少之成對比較若是在較後面進行,由於消費者經歷之前的評估練習,對於偏好的掌握程度增加,更加容易反應偏好,因此顯著偏好係數個數也能夠增加;而屬性個數較多之比較則不受順序影響。在對於整體產品偏好之預測方面,同樣可以發現越晚呈現之題目收集到的資料,建構出之模式估計受測者偏好之能力愈準確。 3. 比較之屬性個數越多,模式預測之效度越高 以相同呈現順序但屬性呈現個數不同進行分析,於估計受測者對產品整體偏好時,再次顯示呈現之屬性個數的確會影響受測者偏好評估;當呈現屬性個數越多,模式之預測能力也較精確。然而在各屬性偏好之顯著性方面,則發現屬性個數較少時,受測者較能準確掌握對某屬性的偏好;隨著屬性個數增加,對受測者而言各屬性間之衝突也越大,也就越無法明確評估對各屬性之相對偏好程度。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | As the development of Internet, information flows rapidly; consumers can search and obtain information at a lower cost for decision making. As a result, the information that consumers can get from the environment would have influence on consumers’ choices. The purpose of this study is to evidence the impact of product attribute presentation approaches on consumer preference assessment based on consumer information processing theory.
In the study, field data are collected by using Adaptive Conjoint Analysis. Different prediction models are built. The significance of respondents’ part-worth values and the prediction abilities of these models are compared. The conclusions are as follows. 1. A more significant respondents’ preference structure will be obtained if more product attributes are displayed at the beginning. 2. The model predicts respondents’ preferences more correctly if it is built by using data which is collected from questions that are displayed later. 3. The model predicts respondents’ preferences more correctly if it is built by using data which is collected from questions that compare more attributes at the same time. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T06:16:35Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-96-R93741060-1.pdf: 799568 bytes, checksum: af404d79eda3e949c25bd1def8cc93c6 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2007 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 謝辭 I
摘要 II Abstract III 目錄 IV 圖目錄 V 表目錄 VI 表目錄 VI 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的 2 第三節 研究架構 3 第四節 論文架構 3 第二章 相關理論與文獻探討 5 第一節 消費者資訊處理理論 5 第二節 聯合分析法 16 第三節 適應性聯合分析法 27 第三章 研究方法 34 第一節 研究假說 34 第二節 研究流程 36 第三節 實驗設計 37 第四章 實證分析 49 第一節 樣本資料描述 49 第二節 模式分析 50 第三節 群別特質分析 59 第五章 結論與建議 62 第一節 研究結論 62 第二節 研究貢獻 63 第三節 研究限制 64 第四節 未來研究方向 65 參考文獻 67 附錄一 第一份問卷 71 附錄二 第二份問卷 82 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.title | 產品屬性呈現方式對消費者偏好評估之影響-由簡入繁與由繁入簡之比較分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Impact of the Product Attribute Presentation Approaches on Consumer Preference Assessment | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 95-1 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳厚銘,周建亨 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 適應性聯合分析法,消費者資訊處理, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | adaptive conjoint analysis,consumer information processing theory, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 93 | |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2007-01-27 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 商學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 商學研究所 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-96-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 780.83 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
