請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/25010
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 鍾國彪(Kuo-Piao Chung) | |
dc.contributor.author | Ya-Yun Lu | en |
dc.contributor.author | 呂雅雲 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T06:00:10Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2007-08-08 | |
dc.date.issued | 2007 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2007-07-30 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 1. 中央健康保險局 健保特約醫療院所名冊(2005.11.4更新) http://www.nhi.gov.tw/index.asp
2. 財團法人醫院評鑑暨醫療品質策進會 醫院評鑑暨教學醫院評鑑90-94年度合格名單(2005.9.29更新) http://www.tjcha.org.tw/admin/94list.asp 3. 國民健康局 民國92年癌症登記報告 http://crs.cph.ntu.edu.tw/crs_c/annual.html/Y92-ALL.pdf 4. 行政院衛生署衛生統計 民國94年死因統計 http://www.doh.gov.tw/statistic/data/死因摘要/94年/94.htm 5. 行政院衛生署衛生統計 民國94年全民健康保險醫療統計年報 http://www.doh.gov.tw/statistic/醫療統計年報/94.htm 6. 國家衛生研究院 癌症研究組 http://www.nhri.org.tw/nhri_org/ca/home.htm 7. 林慧淳、葉玲玲、吳仁佑、黃達夫(2002) 以醫療品質的觀點探討台灣乳癌之診療型態 台灣公共衛生雜誌 21(5):349-362 8. 翁新惠、黃昱瞳、楊長興、呂庭輝(2005) 醫師服務量與極低出生體重新生兒照護品質關係的實證研究 台灣醫學 9(4): 448-454 9. 簡麗年、朱慧凡、劉見祥、鍾國彪、曹昭懿、吳義勇、吳肖琪(2003) 醫院、醫師手術量與醫療品質之關聯性探討-以全股(髖)關節置換為例 台灣公共衛生雜誌 22(2):118-126 10. 呂庭輝(2004) 醫師/醫院服務量及醫師經驗與肝癌病人治療成效之關係 台北護理學院醫護管理研究所碩士論文 11. 金家玉(2002) 市場競爭對醫院產出表現的影響 陽明大學公共衛生研究所碩士論文 12. 施驊真(2002) 癌症病患對醫療資源使用之探討 高雄醫學大學公共衛生學研究所碩士論文 13. 洪意婷(2006) 癌症市場競爭程度與癌症病人住院照護結果之相關性分析台北護理學院醫護管理研究所碩士論文 14. 徐幸妙(1999) 全民健保實施前後台灣癌症照護市場之變化 陽明大學醫務管理研究所碩士論文 15. 張小桂(1998) 迢迢抗癌路,幽谷誰伴行?---台灣癌症病友團體與基金會現況之初探 國立臺灣大學社會學研究所碩士論文 16. 張巧忻(2005) 醫院權屬別與主要癌症照護結果、醫療費用之相關分析 台北護理學院醫護管理研究所碩士論文 17. 張瑋玲(2004) 醫療市場競爭程度對醫療品質的影響 國立臺灣大學衛生政策與管理研究所碩士論文 18. 許玉君(2003) 醫師/醫院服務量及醫師經驗與氣喘病患治療成效相關探討 台北護理學院醫護管理研究所碩士論文 19. 謝郁珠(2005) 直腸癌切除術後醫療利用與品質相關因素之探討 陽明大學衛生福利研究所碩士論文 20. 羅健銘(2004) 住院癌末病患照護型態對住院醫療費用與住院天數之影響 台北護理學院醫護管理研究所碩士論文 21. Bach PB, Cramer LD, Schrag D, Downey RJ, Gelfand SE, Begg CB.(2001) The influence of hospital volume on survival after resection for lung cancer. New England Journal of Medicine. 345(3):181-8 22. Baldwin LM, Adamache W, Klabunde CN, Kenward K, Dahlman C, L Warren J.(2002) Linking physician characteristics and medicare claims data: issues in data availability, quality, and measurement. Medical Care. 40(8 Suppl):IV-82-95 23. Begg CB, Cramer LD, Hoskins WJ, Brennan MF.(1998) Impact Of Hospital Volume On Operative Mortality For Major Cancer Surgery. Journal of the American Medical Association. 280(20):1747-51 24. Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EV, Stukel TA, Lucas FL, Batista I, Welch HG, Wennberg DE.(2002) Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. New England Journal of Medicine. 346(15):1128-37 25. Birkmeyer NJ, Goodney PP, Stukel TA, Hillner BE, Birkmeyer JD.(2005) Do cancer centers designated by the National Cancer Institute have better surgical outcomes? Cancer. 103(3):435-41 26. Blazeby JM, Wilson L, Metcalfe C, Nicklin J, English R, Donovan JL.(2006) Analysis of clinical decision-making in multi-disciplinary cancer teams. Annals of Oncology. 17(3):457-60 27. Bradley PJ, Zutshi B, Nutting CM.(2005) An audit of clinical resources available for the care of head and neck cancer patients in England. Clinical Oncology 17(8):604-9 28. Calman K, Hine D.(1995) A policy framework for commissioning cancer services. UK Department of Health. 1-32 29. Chang JH, Vines E, Bertsch H, Fraker DL, Czerniecki BJ, Rosato EF, Lawton T, Conant EF, Orel SG, Schuchter L, Fox KR, Zieber N, Glick JH, Solin LJ.(2001) The impact of a multidisciplinary breast cancer center on recommendations for patient management: the University of Pennsylvania experience. Cancer. 91(7):1231-7 30. Coburn NG, Swallow CJ, Kiss A, Law C.(2006) Significant regional variation in adequacy of lymph node assessment and survival in gastric cancer. Cancer. 107(9):2143-51 31. Cronin DP, Harlan LC, Potosky AL, Clegg LX, Stevens JL, Mooney MM.(2006) Patterns of care for adjuvant therapy in a random population-based sample of patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer. American Journal of Gastroenterology. 101(10):2308-18 32. Dimick JB, Cowan JA Jr, Upchurch GR Jr, Colletti LM.(2003) Hospital volume and surgical outcomes for elderly patients with colorectal cancer in the United States. Journal of Surgical Research. 114(1):50-6 33. Du Bois A, Rochon J, Lamparter C, Pfisterer J.(2005) Pattern of care and impact of participation in clinical studies on the outcome in ovarian cancer. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer. 15(2):183-91 34. Finlayson EV, Goodney PP, Birkmeyer JD.(2003) Hospital volume and operative mortality in cancer surgery: a national study. Archives of Surgery. 138(7):721-5 35. Fleissig A, Jenkins V, Catt S, Fallowfield L.(2006) Multidisciplinary teams in cancer care: are they effective in the UK? Lancet Oncology. 7(11):935-43 36. Gilligan MA, Neuner J, Zhang X, Sparapani R, Laud PW, Nattinger AB.(2007) Relationship between number of breast cancer operations performed and 5-year survival after treatment for early-stage breast cancer. American Journal of Public Health. 97(3):539-44 37. Gillis CR, Hole DJ.(1996) Survival outcome of care by specialist surgeons in breast cancer: a study of 3786 patients in the west of Scotland. British Medical Journal. 312(7024):145-8 38. Grilli R, Apolone G, Marsoni S, Nicolucci A, Zola P, Liberati A.(1991) The impact of patient management guidelines on the care of breast, colorectal, and ovarian cancer patients in Italy. Medical Care. 29(1):50-63 39. Hand R, Sener S, Imperato J, Chmiel JS, Sylvester JA, Fremgen A.(1991) Hospital variables associated with quality of care for breast cancer patients. Journal of the American Medical Association. 266(24):3429-32 40. Hannan EL.(1999) The Relation between Volume and Outcome in Health Care New England Journal of Medicine 340(21):1677-9 41. Hatzell TA, Ricketts TC, Tropman SE, Paskett ED, Cooper MR.(1999) Rural physicians' understanding of the state-of-the-art in breast, colon and rectum cancer treatment. Cancer Causes & Control. 10(4):261-7 42. Haward R, Amir Z, Borrill C, Dawson J, Scully J, West M, Sainsbury R.(2003) Breast cancer teams: the impact of constitution, new cancer workload, and methods of operation on their effectiveness. British Journal of Cancer. 89(1):15-22 43. Haward R, Eastwood A.(2001) The background, nature and role of the national cancer guidance Clinical Oncology 13(5):322-5 44. Haward R.(2003) Using service guidance to shape the delivery of cancer services: experience in the UK. British Journal of Cancer 89S:S12-14 45. Hebert-Croteau N, Brisson J, Latreille J, Blanchette C, Deschenes L.(1999) Variations in the treatment of early-stage breast cancer in Quebec between 1988 and 1994. Canadian Medical Association Journal. 161(8):951-5 46. Hebert-Croteau N, Brisson J, Lemaire J, Latreille J, Pineault R.(2005) Investigating the correlation between hospital of primary treatment and the survival of women with breast cancer. Cancer. 104(7):1343-8 47. Heimbach JK, Biffl WL, Mitchell EL, Finlayson CA, Schwartzberg BS, Myers A, Rabinovitch R, Franciose RJ.(1999) Breast conservation therapy in affiliated county, university, and private hospitals. American Journal of Surgery. 178(6):466-9 48. Hillner BE, Smith TJ, Desch CE.(2000) Hospital and physician volume or specialisation and outcomes in cancer treatment: importance in quality of cancer care. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 18: 2327-40 49. IOM, Hewitt M, Petitti D.(2001) Interpreting the Volume-Outcome Relationship in the Context of Cancer Care Washington DC: National Cancer Policy Board, Institute of Medicine. National Academy Press 50. IOM, Hewitt M, Simone JL.(1999) Ensuring Quality Cancer Care. Washington DC: National Cancer Policy Board, National Academy Press 51. IOM, Hewitt M.(2000) Interpreting the Volume-Outcome Relationship in the Context of Health Care Quality: Workshop Summary. Washington DC: National Cancer Policy Board. National Academy Press 52. Junor EJ, Hole DJ, Gillis CR.(1994) Management of ovarian cancer: referral to a multidisciplinary team matters. British Journal of Cancer. 70(2):363-70 53. Kahn KL, Malin JL, Adams J, Ganz PA.(2002) Developing a reliable, valid, and feasible plan for quality-of-care measurement for cancer: how should we measure? . Medical Care. 40(6)S:III73-85 54. Killeen SD, O'Sullivan MJ, Coffey JC, Kirwan WO, Redmond HP.(2005) Provider volume and outcomes for oncological procedures. British Journal of Surgery. 92(4):389-402 55. Kunkler IH.(1997)Variations in the management of cancer in the NHS: a legitimate cause for concern? Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 3(3):173-7 56. Lin HC, Xirasagar S, Lee HC, Chai CY.(2006) Hospital volume and inpatient mortality after cancer-related gastrointestinal resections: the experience of an Asian country. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 13(9):1182-6 57. Malin JL, Schneider EC, Epstein AM, Adams J, Emanuel EJ, Kahn KL.(2006) Results of the National Initiative for Cancer Care Quality: how can we improve the quality of cancer care in the United States? Journal of Clinical Oncology. 24(4):626-34 58. Mannel RS, Walker JL, Gould N, Scribner DR Jr, Kamelle S, Tillmanns T, McMeekin DS, Gold MA.(2003) Impact of individual physicians on enrollment of patients into clinical trials. American Journal of Clinical Oncology. 26(2):171-3 59. Marder RJ.(1991) Measuring the quality of care for the cancer patient. Cancer. 67(6 Suppl):1753-8 60. McAvoy B.(2003) 'Optimising cancer care in Australia'. Australian Family Physician. 32(5):369-72 61. McFall SL, Warnecke RB, Kaluzny AD, Aitken M, Ford L,(1994) Physician and practice characteristics associated with judgments about breast cancer treatment. Medical Care. 32(2):106-17 62. Meyerhardt JA, Catalano PJ, Schrag D, Ayanian JZ, Haller DG, Mayer RJ, Macdonald JS, Benson AB 3rd, Fuchs CS.(2003) Association of hospital procedure volume and outcomes in patients with colon cancer at high risk for recurrence. Annals of Internal Medicine. 139(8):649-57 63. Moore MJ, O'Sullivan B, Tannock IF.(1988) How expert physicians would wish to be treated if they had genitourinary cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 6(11):1736-45 64. Munstedt K, von Georgi R, Misselwitz B, Zygmunt M, Stillger R, Kunzel W.(2003) Centralizing surgery for gynecologic oncology—a strategy assuring better quality treatment? Gynecologic Oncology. 89(1):4-8 65. Pitchforth E, Russell E, Van der Pol M.(2002) Access to specialist cancer care: is it equitable?. British Journal of Cancer. 87(11):1221-6 66. Powell AE, Davies HT, Thomson RG.(2003) Using routine comparative data to assess the quality of health care: understanding and avoiding common pitfalls. Quality and Safety in Health Care. 12(2):122–8 67. Richards M, Sainsbury R, Kerr D.(1997) Inequalities in breast cancer care and outcome. British Journal of Cancer. 76(5):634-8 68. Robert OD, Sherri DC.(2005) Cancer patient survival improvement is correlated with the opening of a community cancer center: comparisons with intramural and extramural benchmarks Journal of Oncology Practice. 1(3):84–92 69. Romano PS, Mark DH.(1992) Patient and hospital characteristics related to in-hospital mortality after lung cancer resection. Chest. 101(5):1332-7 70. Roohan PJ, Bickell NA, Baptiste MS, Therriault GD, Ferrara EP, Siu AL.(1998) Hospital volume differences and five-year survival from breast cancer. American Journal of Public Health. 88(3):454-7 71. Sainsbury R, Haward B, Rider L, Johnston C, Round C.(1995) Influence of clinician workload and patterns of treatment on survival from breast cancer. Lancet. 345(8960):1265-70 72. Schrag D, Bach PB, Dahlman C, Warren JL.(2002) Identifying and measuring hospital characteristics using the SEER-Medicare data and other claims-based sources. Medical Care. 40(8 Suppl):IV-96-103. 73. Shen N, Mayo NE, Scott SC, Hanley JA, Goldberg MS, Abrahamowicz M, Tamblyn R.(2003) Factors associated with pattern of care before surgery for breast cancer in Quebec between 1992 and 1997. Medical Care. 41(12):1353-66 74. Simone JV.(2002) Understanding cancer centers. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 20(23):4503-7 75. Simons AJ, Ker R, Groshen S, Gee C, Anthone GJ, Ortega AE, Vukasin P, Ross RK, Beart RW Jr.(1997) Variations in treatment of rectal cancer: the influence of hospital type and caseload. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. 40(6):641-6 76. Smith TJ, Hillner BE.(2001) Ensuring quality cancer care by the use of clinical practice guidelines and critical pathways. Journal of Clinical Oncology 19(11):2886-97 77. Vardy J, Tannock IF.(2004) Quality of cancer care. Annals of Oncology. 15(7):1001-6 78. Vinod SK, Delaney GP, Bauman AE, Barton MB.(2003) Lung cancer patterns of care in south western Sydney, Australia. Thorax. 58(8):690-4 79. Warren JL, Klabunde CN, Schrag D, Bach PB, Riley GF.(2002) Overview of the SEER-Medicare data: content, research applications, and generalizability to the United States elderly population. Medical Care. 40(8 Suppl):IV-3-18 80. Commission on Cancer Facility Information Profile System (FIPS) http://www.facs.org/cancer/fips/index.html 81. National Cancer Policy Board Background Paper: Framing the National Cancer Policy Board's Agenda for Ensuring Access to Quality Cancer Care for All Americans in a Changing Health Care System http://www.iom.edu/subpage.asp?id=12820 82. National Cancer Institution Clinical Trials http://www.cancer.gov/clinicaltrials 83. National Cancer Institution Physician Data Query http://cancernet.nci.nih.gov/cancertopics/pdq 84. U.S. News & World Report America’s Best Hospitals http://www.usnews.com/usnews/health/best-hospitals/tophosp.htm http://www.usnews.com/usnews/health/best-hospitals/methodology_report.pdf 85. UK Department of Health DH home/ Policy and guidance/ Health and social care topics – Cancer http://www.dh.gov.uk/PolicyAndGuidance/HealthAndSocialCareTopics/Cancer/fs/en | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/25010 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 確保癌症照護品質是各國在癌症控制上所一致努力的方向,英國1995年發表” Calman-Hine report ”癌症照護政策報告,藉由建構完整癌症照護網絡、制訂診療指引等方式,以改善癌症存活率偏低、診斷與治療延遲等問題;美國則由智庫IOM在1999年發表”確保癌症照護品質”報告,認為多數癌症病人並未得到適當且高品質的照護,醫療機構間所提供的癌症照護有變異存在,應加強醫療提供者在癌症照護上的責任。國民健康局自90年補助醫院成立癌防治中心,癌症防治法亦自92年頒佈施行,醫院配合國家政策投注相當人力、資源於癌症照護以持續提升診療品質。本研究目的為進行評鑑等級為地區醫院以上之組織設備、照護內容、癌症照護量之描述性分析,主要針對乳癌、子宮頸癌、肝癌、大腸直腸癌、肺癌及口腔癌等六種癌症,探討影響醫院癌症照護量的相關因素。
本研究為一橫斷性研究,以醫院為研究對象共寄發297份結構式問卷,含常設組織、人力、科別、設備、多專科醫療團隊、臨床試驗、診療指引、病友團體、專業人員的教育訓練、癌症病人追蹤或治療結果紀錄等題項;之後使用93年健保住院資料、92年癌症登記資料計算癌症照護量之癌症住院人數、住院人日、平均住院日及新診人數,進行資料連結。本研究使用SAS 8.2軟體進行統計分析,以次數分配、百分比呈現癌症照護現況調查結果,以t檢定、ANOVA、卡方檢定及複迴歸等探討醫院特性、組織設備及癌症照護內容與醫院癌症照護提供之相關情形。 問卷回收共76份,整體回收率為25.59%,以44份有效問卷納入分析;其中醫學中心及區域醫院共回收36份問卷,回收率佔所有醫學中心及區域醫院之42.86%。研究結果如下:(一)醫院設有多專科醫療團隊的比率為59.09%;參與並執行臨床試驗計畫的比率為56.82%;訂有診療指引的比率為68.18%;成立病友團體的比率為62.79%,並以乳癌團體數最多;醫院曾舉辦或參與專業人員的教育訓練活動的比率為90.91%;醫院進行追蹤率紀錄、死亡率紀錄、存活率紀錄的比率分別為45.45%、47.73%及43.18%;(二)醫院特性之「層級別、教學別、權屬別、是否為TCDB填報醫院、是否為TCOG會員醫院」及「醫院科別設置數」與醫院癌症照護量達顯著相關,癌症照護內容之「臨床試驗、診療指引、追蹤或治療結果紀錄」與醫院癌症照護量達顯著相關;(三)癌症住院人數、住院人日、平均住院日、癌症新診人數均呈現右偏分佈,多數癌症病人由少數醫院提供癌症照護服務,但散佈於各醫院。癌症防治法推動實施後,醫院開始重視多專科醫療團隊、診療指引遵循、追蹤及治療結果紀錄等癌症照護內容,致力於確保癌症診療品質。 根據以上研究結果,建議衛生主管機關明訂醫院之監督、賞罰及回饋機制,並加強各層級癌症照護機構功能之宣導;建議醫院落實院內癌症照護管理組織之功能,加強診療指引、多專科醫療團隊、追蹤及治療結果紀錄等癌症照護內容之實質運作;建議後續研究者可增加其他資料之連結,以豐富癌症照護現況的描述。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Ensuring cancer care quality is an international concern of cancer control. In England, NHS structured the cancer care network and published guidances to improve the cancer survival rate and reduce the delay between diagnosis and treatment. The Institute of Medicine considered that most cancer patients in the United States do not receive appropriate cancer care, and the providers should take responsibility for ensuring quality cancer care. In Taiwan, “Cancer Control and Prevention Centers” were set up to provide comprehensive cancer care and collect detailed clinical data since year 2001, and the Cancer Control Act was promulgated in year 2003. The hospital-based cancer care data is lacking and could be applied to the evaluation of cancer care provided from specific hospital types.
The purposes of this study include: (1) To understand the description of hospital cancer care in Taiwan, including the cancer care volume, organization, specialties, equipment, and the cancer care contents for cancer inpatients. (2) To analyse the diversity of cancer care volume among hospitals with different characteristics or cancer care contents. All hospitals of research interests are accredited above district hospitals in Taiwan and provide at least six kinds of cancer including the breast, cervical, liver, colonrectal, lung and oral cancer care. A structural questionnaire was developed and mailed to 297 hospitals. The total response rate is 25.59 percent ( 76/297 ) , and response rate at medical centers and regional hospitals is 42.86 percent ( 36/84 ). Hospital characteristics and the cancer care volume including the number of inpatients, days of stay and average length of stay were calculated from National Health Insurance Research Database, and the number of new diagnostic patients was calculated from Taiwan Cancer Registry Database. The major findings of this study are as follows: (1) The rate hospitals managing cancer patients by multidisciplinary teams was 59.09% ; the rate hospitals providing clinical trials information and accruing patients was 56.82% ; the rate hospitals formulating or adhering to cancer clinical practice guidelines was 68.18% ; the rate hospitals with cancer support group was 62.79%, and breast cancer support group is the most general one ; the rate hospitals offering cancer-related educational activities was 90.91% ; the rate hospitals with follow-up , mortality and survival documents were in sequence 45.45% , 47.73% , and 43.18% . (2) Cancer care volume was significantly related to hospital characteristics, such as accredited level, teaching status, ownership, submitting cancer care data to Taiwan Cancer Data Base (TCDB) , membership of Taiwan Cooperative Oncology Group (TCOG) and the arrangement of specialty division. It was also significantly related to cancer care contents inclusive of clinical trials, clinical practice guidelines and documents of patients’ follow-up and surveillance. (3) The distribution of the cancer care volume was skewed to the right. Hospital cancer care service was concentrated at medical centers and regional hospitals but spread around. After the Cancer Control Act came into effect, hospitals are paying more attention to cancer care contents and improving the quality of cancer care. According to the research results, we recommended that the health authorities should monitor the quality of cancer care, approve well-performed hospitals and announce to the public the function of cancer centers. The health care providers should enhance the practical operation of clinical practice guidelines, multidisciplinary teams, and the documents of patients’ follow-up and surveillance. Future researchers could explain the cancer care service in Taiwan by other source of data, for instance using Taiwan Cancer Data Base (TCDB) to attain the stage data and explore the patterns of cancer care, and using the accreditation data to attain more hospital characteristics. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T06:00:10Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-96-R92843015-1.pdf: 1110761 bytes, checksum: 15045740db646a502cbb816444455457 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2007 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌 謝 i
摘 要 iii Abstract v 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景 1 第二節 研究動機 2 第三節 研究目的 4 第二章 文獻探討 7 第一節 國際癌症照護政策 7 第二節 癌症照護的相關因素 16 第三節 綜合討論 40 第三章 研究方法 42 第一節 研究設計與研究架構 42 第二節 研究假說 45 第三節 研究材料 46 第四節 變項操作型定義 48 第五節 資料處理與分析方法 56 第四章 研究結果 61 第一節 樣本組成特性 61 第二節 描述性統計 68 第三節 雙變項分析 80 第四節 多變項分析 85 第五章 討論 149 第一節 資料品質 149 第二節 重要描述性結果討論 152 第三節 研究假說驗證與討論 156 第四節 研究限制 162 第六章 結論與建議 163 第一節 結論 163 第二節 建議 164 參考文獻 166 中文部分 166 英文部分 168 附 錄 175 附錄一 問卷專家效度名單 175 附錄二 癌症照護現況調查問卷專家效度結果 176 附錄三 癌症照護現況調查問卷 182 附錄四 問卷回覆醫院 190 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 台灣醫院別癌症照護資源與內容之分析 | zh_TW |
dc.title | An Analysis of Hospital Cancer Care Resources and Contents
for Cancer Inpatients in Taiwan | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 95-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.coadvisor | 賴美淑(Mei-Shu Lai) | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳建仁(Chien-Jen Chen),趙坤郁(Kun-Yu Zhao),黃清水(Ching-Shui Huang) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 癌症照護,醫院特性,多專科醫療團隊,臨床試驗,診療指引,癌症照護量, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | cancer care,hospital characteristics,multidisciplinary team,clinical trial,clinical practice guideline,cancer care volume, | en |
dc.relation.page | 190 | |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2007-07-31 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 公共衛生學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 醫療機構管理研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 健康政策與管理研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-96-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.08 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。