請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/24957完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 李吉仁(Ji-Ren Lee) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Chi-Feng Cheng | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 鄭吉峰 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T05:59:04Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2007-08-03 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2007 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2007-08-01 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | e天下雜誌,2005,「GPS導航,神達衝上世界第四」,8月號。
ETtoday,2006,「合併案�公平會核准廣達電腦與鼎天國際合併」,6月9日。 大紀元時報,2006,「廣達鼎天策略聯盟 取得GPS關鍵技術」,1月23日。 中央社,2005,「茂迪向上游整合 持續擴大產能」,9月26日。 中央電台,2006,「太陽光電未來5年年成長22∼35%」,7月4日。 中時電子報,2006,「評估風險大過效益 茂迪:另覓2歐商供料 營運樂觀」,7月8日。 中國航天報,2003,「中國衛星的應用前景」,5月23日。 工商時報,2005,「EMEA地區四大GPS品牌 台商代工」,5月25日。 工研院IEK,2005,2005年第三季我國通訊產業產銷調查報告,經濟部工業局報告11月。 工研院IEK,2006,全球GPS市場發展狀況,7月20日。 中信證券研究報告,2006,「崇越」, 2月27日。 中信證券研究報告,2005,「茂迪」, 7月7日。 中信證券研究報告,2006,「日正當中-太陽能產業」,3月9日。 中信證券研究報告,2006,「益通」,3月8日。 中信證券研究報告,2006,「台達電」, 3月1日。 中信證券研究報告,2005,「風力發電機-再生能源明日之星」,8月2日。 台証證券研究報告,2005,「2005年竄出的黑馬GPS產業」,8月26日。 蔡信行,2006,替代能源之回顧與展望(上),石油季刊,42卷1期:頁33-48。 李芳齡譯,2005,成長的賭局:看準下一個新成長事業,台北:天下雜誌出版。Campbell, A. & Park, R. 2005. The growth gamble: when leaders should bet big on new businesses and how to avoid expensive failures. Nicholas Brealey Publishing 李誠偉,2001,「Garmin衛星定位系統 台灣品牌驚奇鎖定全球」,e天下雜誌,6月號。 李樹田、李芳齡譯,2004,創新者的解答,台北:天下雜誌。Christensen, M. C. & Rayor, M. E. 2003. The Innovator's Solution: creating and sustaining successful growth. Harvard Business School Press . 李樹田、李芳齡譯,2003,成功不墜,台北:天下雜誌。Sull, D. N. 2003. Revival of Fittest: Why Good Company Go Bad and How Great Manager Remake Them. Harvard Business School Press . 呂鴻德,1992,技術策略、功能互動與產品創新績效關係之研究-資訊電子業成長階段之模式,台灣大學商學研究所未出版之博士論文。 吳泓緒,2002,企業進入海外市場時機影響績效之研究—以台商度大陸直接投資為例,國立政治大學國際貿易所未出版之碩士論文。 吳真如譯,2002,基業長青:企業永續經營的準則,台北:智庫文化。Collins, J. C. & Porras, J. I. 1994. Built to Last – Successful Habits of Visionary Companies. Triumph Publishing . 吳悅萍,2005,探討吸收能力、整合能力對持久性競爭優勢影響之研究-動態能力觀點,屏東科技大學企業管理系未出版之碩士論文。 多維新聞,2005,「歐盟邀中國在伽利略計劃中參加到底」, 7月2日。 林玉如,2004,全球GPS市場2003-2008年穩定成長,經濟部通訊產業發展推動小組 無線通訊產業評析。 陳國龍,2000,先發優勢效果之研究–資源基礎觀點,中原大學企業管理學系未出版之碩士論文。 陳豫德,2005,「手持終端的行動定位主流技術-AGPS技術優勢」,ITIS產業觀察。 楊勝帆,2003,現在進入GPS 市場還太早?,拓墣產業研究,6月26日。 葉振男,2003,GPS IC晶片市場,拓墣產業研究,5月27日。 張沼沂,2005,台灣汽車零組件產業競爭優勢與發展趨勢預測,國立交通大學管理科學學程未出版之碩士論文。 無線電技術,2005,「汽車電子產業掃描」,10月號。 富邦證券研究報告,2005,「Solar產業發展概況」,10月17日。 葉振男,2003,「GPS晶片產業動態掃瞄」,拓墣產業研究,5月27日。 數位時代雙週,2005,「專訪茂迪總經理左元淮�靠熱情投入太陽能領域」,4月1日。 數位時代雙週,2005,「全球最具投資價值的太陽能產業公司�益通正面迎戰股王茂迪」,4月1日。 數位時代雙週刊,2006「2006最in 產業焦點-IT大廠競逐GPS百億商機」,3月27日,125期。 賴以代,2006,技術演進下垂直分工廠商經營疆界變遷之研究–以台積電及聯電為例,國立台灣大學商學研究所未出版之碩士論文。 賴秀珊,2004,網路企業先佔優勢之研究,國立中山大學資訊管理所未出版之碩士論文。 廖文森,1996,進入障礙、公司特質與進入策略、競爭策略關係之研究–以臺灣地區先進汽車電子零組件廠商為例,國立政治大學企業管理學系未出版之碩士論文。 廖祐呈,1998,先佔優勢與門檻時間之探討-以台灣主機板產業為例,國立政治大學國際貿易學系未出版之碩士論文。 楊仁奇,1991,先占廠商競爭優勢之策略分析,國立台灣大學商學研究所未出版之碩士論文。 鄭呈皇與林宏達,2006,「挑最難的下手」,商業週刊,第 953 期。 蔡志仁,2005,GPS 開啟神達事業第2春,台証證券研究報告,2月16日。 蔡信行,2006,「替代能源之回顧與展望」,石油季刊,42(1):33-48。 聯合新聞網,2007,「中油投資百億設多晶矽原料廠」,7月6日。 鍾貴平,1993,進入順序與競爭策略之研究:以人壽保險業為例,國立台灣大學商學研究所未出版之碩士論文。 英文部份 Aaker, D. A. 1984. Strategic Market Management, New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons. ABI Research. 2003. GPS Worth $22B in 2008. October 1. Barney, J. 1991. Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage, Journal of Management, 17(1):99-120. Bourdieu, P. 1986. The Forms of Capital. In J. G. Richardson (ed.). Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education, Westport, CT: Greenwood Press. Browman, D., & Gatignon, H. 1995. Determinants of Competitors Response Time to a New Product Introduction, Journal of Marketing Research, 23: 42-53. Business Week. 2006 . One GPS Giant Too Many?. June 21. Carpenter, G. S., & Nakamoto, K. 1989. Consumer Preference Formation and Pioneering Advantage, Journal of Marketing Research, 26(3):285-298. & .1990.Competitive Strategies for Late Entry into a Market with a Dominant Brand, Management Science, 36(10):1268-1278. Chandler, A. 1990. Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press. Collis, D. J., & Montgomery, C. A. 1995. Competing On Resources: Strategy in The 1990s. Harvard Business Review, July-August:118-128. Coleman, J. S. 1988. Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94:95-119. Coyne, K. P. 1986. Sustainable Competitive Advantage – What It Is, What It Isn’t. Business Horizons. 29:54-61. DeLeo, F. 1994. Understanding the Roots of Your Competitive Advantage, London , UK: Pergamon Press. Electronic News . 2005. SiRF Acquires Motorola’s GPS Lines. Jun 2. Grant, R .M. 1991. The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation. California Management Review, 33(3):114-135. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C.K.1990.The Core Competence of the Corporation. Harvard Business Review, May-June:79-91. Hamel, G., & Heene, A. 1994. Competence-Base Competition. New York, NY: John Willey & Sons. Hambrick, D. C. 1989. Key Success Factor: Test of General Theory in the Mature Industrial Product Sector, Strategic Management Journal, 10:367-382. Hidding, G. J., & Williams,J.R.1998.Are there First-Mover Advantages in B2B eCommerce Technologies? Strategic management Journal, 19:683-696. Hill, C. W. L., & Jones, G. R. 1998. Strategic Management Theory: An Integrated Approach (4th ed.), Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company. Hofer, C. W., & Schendel, D. 1985. Strategic Formulation:Analytical Concepts. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Company. Huff, L. C., & Robinson, W. T. 1994. The Impact of Leadtime and Years of Competitive Rivalry on Pioneer Market Share Advantages, Management Science, 40(10):1370-1377. Jacobs, J. 1965. The Death and Life of Great American Cities. London, UK: Penguin Books. Kardes, F. R., & Sanbonmatsu, D.1993. Direction of Comparison, Expected Feature Correlation, and the Set-Size Effect in Preference Judgment, Journal of Consumer Psychology, 2(1):39-54. Kerin, R. A.,Varadarajan, P. R, & Peterson, R. A. 1992. First-Mover Advantage: A Synthesis, Conceptual Framework, and Research Propositions, Journal of Marketing, 56(4):33-52. Leana, C. R., & van Buren, H. J. 1999. Organizational Social Capital and Employment Practices, Academy of Management Review, 24(3):538-555. Leonard-Barton, D. 1992. Core Capabilities and Core Rigidities: A paradox in Managing New Product Development, Strategic Management Journal, 13:111-125. Leong, G. K., Snyder, D. L. & Ward, P. T. 1990. Research in the Process and Content of Manufacturing Strategy. OMEGA, 18:109-122. Levitt, T. 1986. The Marketing Imagination. New York, NY: The Free Press. Lieberman, M. B., & Montgomery, D. B. 1988. First-Mover Advantages, Strategic Management Journal, 9 (Special Issue), 41-58. & .1998.First-mover (Dis) Advantages: Retrospective and Link with the Resource-Based View, Strategic Management Journal, 19(12):1111-1125. Mansfield, E., Schwartz, M., & Wagner, S. 1981. Imitation Costs and Patents: An Empirical Study, Economic Journal, 91(364): 907-918. Markus, M. L. 1989. Case Selection in a Disconfirmatory Case Study. Harvard Business School Research Colloquium, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School, 20-26. Maykut, P., & Morehouse, R. 1994. Beginning Qualitative Research a Philosophic and Practical Guide. London, UK: The Falmer Press. Molin, M. J. 2000. Dynamic Capabilities, How Can We Make Them Work?. Working paper, Copenhagen Business School Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy. Peterson, R. A. 1982. Implications of FCC head-star policy. Testimony before Federal Communication Commision. Porter, M. E. 1980.Competitive Strategy. New York, NY: The Free Press. Porter, M. E. 1985.Competitive Advantage. New York, NY: The Free Press. Porter, M. E. 1990. The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York, NY: The Free Press. Putnam, R. D.1993. The Prosperous Community: Social Capital and Public Life. American Prospect, 13:35-42. Robinson, W. T., Fornell, C., & Sullivan, M. W. 1992. Are Market Pioneers Intrinsically Stronger than Later Entrants? Strategic Management Journal, 13(8):609-624. Rogol, M. 2005. Sun Screen II-Investment Opportunities in Solar Power. Crédit Lyonnais Securities Asia Equity Research. Ron, A., & Constance, E. H. 2003. Corporate Effects and Dynamic Managerial Capabilities, Strategic Management Journal, 24(10):1011-1025. Schmalensee, R. 1983. Advertising and Entry Deterrence:An Exploratory Model, Journal of Political Economy, 91(4):636-653. Schnaars, S. P. 1986. When Entering Growth Markets, Are Pioneers Better than Poachers?. Business Horizons, Mar-Apr:27-36. Schoemaker, P. J. H. 1992. How to Link Strategic Vision to Core Capabilities. Sloan Management Review, Spring:67–81. Shankar, V., & Carpenter,G., & Krishnamurthi, I. 1998. Late Mover Advantage:How Innovative Late Entrants Outsell Pioneer, Journal of Marketing Research, 35(1):54-70. Szymanski, D. M., Troy, L. C. & Bharadwaj, S. G. 1995. Order of Entry and Business Performance: An Empirical Synthesis and Reexamination, Journal of Marketing, 59(4):17-33. Sullivan, M. W. 1990. Measuring Image Spillovers in Umbrella-Brand Products, Journal of Business, 63(3):309-329. Tampoe, M. 1994. Exploiting the Core Competitive of your Organization, Long Range Planning, 27(4):66-77. Tang, M. J. 1988. An Economic Perspective on Escalating Commitment, Strategic Management Journal, 9:79-92. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. 1997. Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management, Strategic Management Journal, 18(7):509-533. Thomas, L. A.1995. Brand Capital and Incumbent Firms' Positions in Evolving Markets, Review of Economics and Statistics, 77:522-534. . 1996. Advertising Sunk Costs and Credible Spatial Preemption, Strategic Management Journal, 17(6):481-498. Tsai, W., & Ghoshal, S. 1998. Social Capital and Value Creation: the Role of Intrafirm Networks, Academy of Management Journal, 41:464-476. Tufano, P. 1989. Financial Innovation and First-Mover Advantage, Journal of Financial Economics, 25:213-240. Wernerfelt, B. 1984. A Resource-Based View of the Firm, Strategic Management Journal, 5: 171-180. Westlund, H. 2003. Implications of Social Capital for Business in the Knowledge Economy: Theoretical Considerations. Working Paper, International Forum on Economic Implication of Social Capital. Wrigley, L. 1970. Divisional Autonomy and Diversification. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School. Yin, R. K. 1994. Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. 網站: ABI Research http://www.abiresearch.com BP Solar http://www.bp.com/modularhome.do?categoryId=4260 FreeChart http://www.FreeChart.com Isofoton http://www.isofoton.com Garmin http://www.garmin.com Magellen http://www.magellangps.com Q-Cells http://www.q-cells.com Sharp Solar http://solar.sharpusa.com Shell Solar http://www.shell.com/home/Framework?siteId=shellsolar SiRF http://www.sirf.com Trimble http://www.Trimble.com 旺能 http://www.delta.com.tw/delsolar/delsolar.htm 天威保變 http://www.twbb.com.cn 天威英利 http://www.yinglisolar.com 尚得電力 http://www.suntech-power.com 茂迪 http://www.motech.com.tw 益通 http://www.e-tonsolar.com 昱能 http://www.gintech.com.tw 知光能源 http://www.asectw.com 興達科技 http://www.newcoretek.com.tw 昇陽光電科技 http://www.solartech-energy.com 鼎天http://www.royaltek.com 環天 http://www.globalsat.com.tw 長天 http://www.holux.com.tw 廣達 http://www.quanta.com.tw 公開資訊觀測站 http://newmops.tse.com.tw 台灣證券交易所 http://www.tse.com.tw 櫃檯買賣中心 http://www.otc.org.tw Nasdaq http://www.nasdaq.com Yahoo!奇摩 http://www.yahoo.com 工研院經資中心 http://www.iek.itri.org.tw | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/24957 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 先進者優勢(First Mover Advantage)的研究,對於企業生存與成長而言具有相當的重要性。面對市場的激烈競爭,是否要領先對手發表新產品開發新技術,或是等待技術成熟再進入市場?過去的研究對於先進者優勢的存在與否,爭論從未停歇過。對於企業的經營階層,新產品或新技術是否能握有先進者優勢,是掌握進入時機的一個關鍵考量點之一。太晚進入到可形成先進者優勢的產業,將喪失大好的獲利機會。太早進入難以形成先進者優勢的產業,其結果往往會是以虧損的結果收場。為回應此一問題,本研究針對GPS與太陽能電池兩個產業,探討其先進入者的優勢來源與可維持性。這兩個高成長產業的早期技術發展均非為了商業用途,這兩個產業形成的時間約莫在1950-1960年代。
本研究發現GPS產業的先進者優勢無法有效的維持,然而太陽能電池產業的領導廠商,卻能夠持續不斷的維持領先地位。經過進一步分析,我們認為GPS產業之所以無法擁有先進者優勢,而太陽能電池產業能夠形成先進者優勢,可能是與不同產品的技術與現有產業技術的整合程度與接近的程度有關。GPS產品的技術與現有其他電子通訊的技術十分接近,很容易與其他電子產品整合,因此,對於電子系統廠商而言,進入的障礙與門檻較低,先進廠商的優勢遂難維持。反觀,太陽能電池本身產品的技術與現有電子產品的技術整合程度低、且相似程度低,所以,相關的電子或半導體廠商較難進入該市場,加上上游原料的掌握,為先進廠商的一個重要優勢,這使得先進廠商的先進者優勢可以維持。綜合言之,先進者優勢能否維持,與產品技術與其他產品技術相似度及產業獨立性有關。除了產業面因素的影響之外,本文發現企業本身的慣性,導致GPS領導廠商未能掌握產業發展的不斷變化的關鍵因素,也可能是企業無法掌握先進者優勢的內部因素。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | The existence of first mover advantage (FMA) is vital to firm’s entry timing and survival. Finding the best timing to enter a new market is always a tough decision for a new entrant. Early entering into an industry where FMA is hard to sustain may suffer from lower returns while later entering into an industry where FMA can be sustained may lose a great opportunity to grow and lead. Previous research on FMA at best reveals a mixed result which calls for further research exploration at the case level. The present thesis undertooks a comparative study on the GPS(Global Positioning System) and solar cell industries. Although there are many similarities between these two industries, key technologies pertainting to these two industries were not for commercial purposes when they were first invented.
According to our research, we found that it is hard to maintain FMA in the GPS industry but leaders in solar cell industry seem to keep their leading positions for long. Reasons attributtable to such a difference are associated with the characrteristics of perspective technologies. GPS technology is comparatively more similar to the presently used communication technology and therefore is easier to be integrated by the existing eletronic devices. Leading system manufacturers in the industry are difficult to maintain FMA due to lower entry barrier. On the other hand, solar cell technology tends to be more difficult to be integrated with other electronic products and therefore it is more difficult for other electronic or semiconductor companies to penetrate this market. Another factor that helps to sustain the FMA for incumbent companies is that they have better control over the source of silicon material. In summary, the sustainability of FMA is relevant to the similarities between the technologies of products and the interdependency between the industries in concern. The research also discovers that, in addition to the external factor of industry interdependency, the potential inertia of major industry players in GPS industry constitute a critical internal factor to erode FMA as these incumbents often fails to control over the ever-changing key success factors of the industry due to complacency and conservatism. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T05:59:04Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-96-R92724102-1.pdf: 2047053 bytes, checksum: 89ce2f1ac8d09af7b0a1a0fe43ec1771 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2007 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 謝詞 2
中文摘要 3 Thesis Abstract 4 目錄 5 圖次 6 表次 8 第一章 緒論 9 第一節 研究背景與動機 9 第二節 研究目的與問題 11 第三節 研究流程、架構與方法 12 第二章 文獻探討 18 第一節 競爭優勢 18 第二節 先進者優勢 32 第三章 太陽能電池產業 43 第一節 簡介 43 第二節 太陽能電池的歷史與技術發展 48 第三節 市場規模與產業結構 57 第四節 全球主要競爭者分析 64 第五節 台灣廠商現況 69 第四章 GPS產業 74 第一節 簡介 74 第二節 GPS的歷史與技術發展 77 第三節 市場規模與產業結構 87 第四節 全球主要競爭者分析 99 第五節 台灣廠商現況 105 第五章 研究討論與結果 112 第一節 太陽能電池與GPS產業之比較 112 第二節 個案討論 117 第三節 結論 120 第四節 研究限制與未來研究建議 124 參考文獻 125 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 競爭優勢 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 太陽能電池產業 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | GPS產業 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 產業分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 先進者優勢 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Competitive Advantage | en |
| dc.subject | Solar Cell Industry | en |
| dc.subject | GPS Industry | en |
| dc.subject | First Mover Advantage | en |
| dc.subject | Industry Analysis | en |
| dc.title | 新興產業與先進者優勢之個案研究: 以GPS與太陽能電池產業為例 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | A Comparative Case Study on Industry Emergence and First Mover Advantages: The Case of GPS and Solar Cell Industries | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 95-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 湯明哲(Ming-Je Tang),劉恆逸(Heng-Yih Liu) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 產業分析,競爭優勢,先進者優勢,GPS產業,太陽能電池產業, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Industry Analysis,Competitive Advantage,First Mover Advantage,GPS Industry,Solar Cell Industry, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 132 | |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2007-08-01 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 國際企業學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 國際企業學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-96-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 2 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
