請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/2489
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 黃文達,楊棋明 | |
dc.contributor.author | Ya-Chen Lee | en |
dc.contributor.author | 李雅蓁 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-13T06:40:53Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2018-07-20 | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-13T06:40:53Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2017-07-20 | |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2017-07-11 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 中央氣象局 (2016)。「颱風特輯」。取自
http:// www.cwb.gov.tw/ V7/knowledge/planning/index.htm。 王惠正、林明哲、黃琮琪 (2014) 。「先進國家實施農業保險之經驗」。取自農糧署網站首頁/農業政策/主要國家農業政策法規與經濟動態/農業金融及保險/其他。 http://www.coa.gov.tw/ws.php?id=2504934。 白秋菊、林佩慧 (2015)。「韓國農業天然災害救助及農業保險制度」。行政院農業委員會公務出國考察報告。取自http://report.nat.gov.tw/ ReportFront/index.jspx。 宋宜昇 (2016) 。「兩岸農業保險制度之研究」。淡江大學保險學系保險經營研究所在職專班。碩士論文。 林月金、高德錚 (2005) 。「臺灣梨產業分析」。《梨栽培管理技術研討會專輯》。13-46。 林明哲 (2014) 。「臺灣實施稻作保險之研究」。國立中興大學應用經濟學系。碩士論文。 林美瑄、王鎬杰 (2012) 。「農業天然災害救助爭議之態樣及機制檢討」。《農政與農情》。234期。 柯木興 (1998) 。社會保險,臺北市:三民。 凌氤寶 (2012) 。財產保險學(2版)。臺北市:華泰文化。 凌氤寶、康裕民、陳森松 (2005) 。保險學概論(2版)。臺北市:華泰文化。 凌氤寶、康裕民、陳森松 (2012) 。保險學:理論與實務(7版)。臺北市:華泰文化。 陳右人、阮素芬 (2015) 。「梨樹栽培簡介」。優質寄接梨生產手冊。農糧署。17-21。 陳怡君 (2013) 。「我國稻作保險費率估算制度之研究」。逢甲大學風險管理與保險學系。碩士論文。 陳建宏 (2011)。日本「農業災害補償制度」概要。取自農委會網站首頁/農業政策/主要國家農業政策法規與經濟動態/農業政策概觀/亞洲。http://www.coa.gov.tw/ws.php?id=2504896。 國泰世紀產物保險股份有限公司 (2016) 。國泰產物芒果農作物保險(政府災助連結型)。取自 https://www.cathay-ins.com.tw/ pdf/other/law/584.pdf。 陳敦源、魯炳炎 (2008) 。「創造共識:民主政治中的政策行銷管理」。《研考雙月刊》。32卷,2期,3-15。 富邦產物保險股份有限公司 (2015) 。農作物保險專區。取自https://www.fubon.com/insurance/b2c/content/farm_insurance/index.html。 黃育漢 (2011) 。「臺灣農業保險之定位及可行性分析」。淡江大學保險學系保險營研究所在職專班。碩士論文。 曾明華 (2012) 。「參加『農業及農村金融風險管理研討會』報告」。行政院農業委員會公務出國報告。取自 http://report.nat.gov.tw/ ReportFront/index.jspx。 黃美玲、王財驛 (2011) 。「以保險經營模式與保險費率探討我國實施政策性花卉保險之可行性」。《國立虎尾科技大學學報》。30卷,2期,47-62。 湯凱欣 (2016) 。「國際農業保險制度比較」。國立臺灣大學農業經濟學系。碩士論文。 黃榮源、謝耀霆 (2009) 。「臺北市節能減碳政策之研究: 以政策行銷角度分析」。《文官制度季刊》。1卷,4期,79-110。 農林水產省 (2016) 。「農業災害補償制度(農業共済)の概要」。取自http://www.maff.go.jp/j/keiei/hoken/saigai_hosyo/。 農委會 (2017) 。「推動試辦農作物天然災害保險」。農委會網站首頁/重大政策/推動試辦農作物天然災害保險。取自 http://www.coa.gov. tw/ws.php?id=2504021。 農委會 (2016) 。「105年1月寒流農業災情報告」。農委會網站首頁/新聞與公報/農業新聞/105年1月寒流農業災情報告。取自 http://www.coa.gov.tw/theme_data.php?theme=news &sub_theme =agri&id=5395。 楊明憲 (2014) 。國外實施各類型農業保險經驗之探究。取自http://www.rest.org.tw/upload/2014072217515989.pdf。 楊明憲 (2016a) 。「主要國家實施農作物保險模式之探討(上)」。取自農糧署網站首頁/農業政策/主要國家農業政策法規與經濟動態/農業金融及保險/其他。http://www.coa.gov.tw/ws.php?id=2504934。 楊明憲 (2016b) 。「主要國家實施農作物保險模式之探討(下)」。取自農糧署網站首頁/農業政策/主要國家農業政策法規與經濟動態/農業金融及保險/其他。http://www.coa.gov.tw/ws.php?id=2504934。 楊明憲 (2011) 。「國外實施各類型農業保險經驗之探究」。取自農糧署網站首頁/農業政策/主要國家農業政策法規與經濟動態/農業金融及保險/其他。http://www. coa.gov.tw/ws.php?id=2504934。 楊明憲、黃桂萍(2015)。「歐盟農業保險之技術規範」。《主要國家農業政策法規與經濟動態》。取自www.rest.org.tw/upload/2016021816441838.pdf。 葉高陞 (2002) 。「論養殖漁業保險」。國立政治大學風險管理與保險研究所。碩士論文。 董淑娟 (2001) 。「實施農作物保險可行性分析--精算收支平衡模式之應用」。國立高雄第一科技大學風險管理與保險研究所。碩士論文。 農業天然災害救助辦法 (2017) 。全國法規資料庫。取自http://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?PCode=M0090019 楊靜利 (2000) 。「社會保險的意義與社會福利體系」。《臺灣社會福利學刊(電子期刊)》。1期,157-177。 農糧署 (2017) 。「釋迦收入保險試辦及補助辦法」。取自農糧署網站首頁/農糧法規/行政規則/企劃類/釋迦收入保險試辦及補助辦法。http://www.afa.gov.tw/laws_index.aspx?CatID=1182。 廖萬正 (2001) 。「優良梨管理作業」。《臺中區農業專訓》。第39期。 潘永輝 (2008) 。「蕉農對香蕉保險的支付意願分析和支付能力測度-來自海南省1167戶蕉農的經驗證據」。《中國農業科學》。41卷,11期,3596-3603。 蔡靜瑩、陳欣宜 (2017) 。「釋迦收入保險試辦及補助辦法訂定簡介」。《農政與農情》。297期。 羅元鴻 (2010) 。「農業保險制度之分析」。《農政與農情》。215期。 蘇怡如、鄭美孌、王俊豪 (2013) 。「農作物天然災害損失之空間分析」。《農業經濟叢刊》。18卷,2期,73-119。 Aditya, K. S., Khan T., and Kishore A.. 2016. Crop Insurance in India: Drivers and Impact. 2016 Agricultural & Applied Economics Association Annual Meeting. July31-Aug. 2, Boston, MA. Boyd, M., Pai, J., Zhang, Q., Wang, H.H. and Wang, K.. 2011. Factors Affecting Crop Insurance Purchases in China: the Inner Mongolia Region. China Agricultural Economic Review, 3 (4): 441-450. Chung, W.. 2014. Analysis of Social Welfare Effects of Crop Revenue Insurance. Journal of Rural Development, 37 (4): 75-95. Chung, W.. 2016. The Performance and Improvement Strategies of Crop Natural Disaster Insurance in Korea. FFTC-RDA International Seminar on Implementing and Improving Crop Natural Disaster Insurance Program, June14-16, Jeonju Korea. Retrieved from http://ap.fftc.agnet. org/ap_ db.php?id=645. Decena, F. L. C.. 2016. Agricultural Insurance in the Philippines (Food and Fertilizer Technology Center (FFTC) for the Asian and Pacific Region for the project titled “Asia-Pacific Information Platform in Agricultural Policy”). Taipei City, Taiwan, ROC: FFTC. Dragos, S.L. and Mare, C.. 2014. An Econometric Approach to Factors Affecting Crop Insurance in Romani. E+M Ekonomie a Managementa, 93-103. Enjolras, G., Capitanio, F., Aubert, M. and Adinolfi, F.. 2014. Direct Payments, Crop Insurance and the Volatility of Farm Income. Some Evidence in France and in Italy. New Medit, 1: 31-40. Enjolras, G. and Sentis, P.. 2011. Crop Insurance Policies and Purchases in France. Agricultural Economics, 42: 475–486. Glauber, J.W.. 2016. The US crop insurance program and WTO disciplines. Agricultural Finance Review, 76 (1): 6 - 14. Goodwin, B. K., Vandeveer, M. L. and Deal, J. L.. 2004. An Empirical Analysis of Acreage Effects of Participation in the Federal Crop Insurance Program. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 86: 1058-1077. Iturrioz, R.. 2009. Agricultural insurance. Primer series on insurance ; issue no. 12. Washington, DC: World Bank. Retrieved from http://documents. worldbank.or g/curated/en /985551468150 558970/Agricultural-insurance. Jeerachaipaisarn, T. 2012. Recent Developments of Crop Insurance in Thailand.Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/daf/fin/49657525.pdf. Ke, W., Qiao, Z., Kimura, S. and Akter, S.. 2015. Is the Crop Insurance Program Effective in China? Evidence from Farmers Analysis in Five Provinces. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 14 (10): 2109–2120. O’ Donoghue, Erik. J.. 2014. The Effects of Premium Subsidies on Demand for Crop Insurance. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, ERR-169. Okada, F.. 2016. Sustainable Growth in Crop Natural Disaster Insurance: Experiences of Japan. FFTC Agricultural Policy Platform (FFTC-AP). Retrieved from http://ap.fftc.agnet.org/ap_db.php?id=643. Panda, A.. 2013. Climate Variability and the Role of Access to Crop Insurance as a Social-Protection Measure: Insights from India. Development Policy Review, 31(S2): 57-73. Panda, A., Sharma, U., Ninan, K.N., and Patt, A.. 2013. Adaptive Capacity Contributing to Improved Agricultural Productivity at the Household Level:Empirical Findings Highlighting the Importance of Crop Insurance. Global Environmental Change, 23:782–790. Schmidhuber, J. and Tubiello, F. N.. 2007. Global Food Security under Climate Change. PNAS, 104 (50): 19703–19708 Shields, D. A.. 2015. Federal Crop Insurance: Background. Congressional Research Service, 1-23. Singh, G.. 2010. Crop Insurance in India. Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad India. Retrieved from http://www. iimahd.ernet.in/ publications/data/ 2010-06-01 Singh.pdf. Sinha, S. and Tripathi, N.K.. 2014. Assessment of Crop Insurance International Practices, Policies and Technologies as Risk Mitigation Tools in India and Thailand. International Journal of Advanced Research, 2 (9): 769 -789. Sinha, S. and Tripathi, N.K.. 2016. Assessing the Challenges in Successful Implementation and Adoption of Crop Insurance in Thailand. Sustainability, 8 (12) , 1306. Stutley, C.. 2011. Agricultural Insurance in Asia and the Pacific Region. Bangkok, Thailand: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific. Swiss Re. 2016. Natural catastrophes and man-made disasters in 2015: Asia suffers substantial losses. Retrieved from http: // reliefweb. int/sites/ reliefweb. int/files/ resources/sigma1_2016_en.pdf. Thang, T. C.. 2014. Agricultural Insurance Policies in Vietnam. FFTC Agricultural Policy Platform (FFTC-AP). Retrieved from http://ap.fftc.agnet.org/ap_db. php?id=276. Wang, M., Ye, T. and Shi, P.. 2015. Factors Affecting Farmers’ Crop Insurance Participation in China. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 00 (2015):1–14. Win, H. E.. 2016. Crop Insurance in Thailand. FFTC Agricultural Policy Platform(FFTC-AP) . Retrieved from http://ap.fftc.agnet. org/ap_db.php?id=676. Yazdanpanah, M., Zamani, G. H., Stefan, H. S., Monfared, N. and Yaghoubi, J.. 2013. Measuring Satisfaction of Crop Insurance a Modified American Customer Satisfaction Model Approach Applied to Iranian Farmers. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 5: 19–27. Yoon, H.. 2016. Claim Adjustments in Korea’s Crop Natural Disaster Insurance. FFTC Agricultural Policy Platform (FFTC-AP). Retrieved from http://ap. fftc. agnet. org/ap_ db.php?id=649. Yu, Y. and Cheng, J.. 2011. An Empirical Analysis of Farmer’s WTP for Chinese-Oriented Agriculture Insurance - A Case of Rice Insurance in Panshan County, Liaoning Province. Journal of Management Science & Statistical Decision, 8 (3):41-54. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/2489 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 臺灣夏秋季易受颱風、豪雨影響,冬季則有寒害,造成農業嚴重損失。為提升對農民的保障,農委會於2015年建立農作物保險制度,始於高接梨,後續擴展到所有梨種並推出芒果農作物保險及釋迦收入保險,雖屬起步階段,但商品已呈多元化發展。本研究先分析各國農作物保險實施概況,發現於發展之初需以提高補助、取消救濟、未參與者不能得到政府其他補助、超過一定面積需強制投保、由國外已具經驗之公司投入、開發多元商品以及運用多重管道宣傳等方式維持保險制度推動,而保費補貼可與其他重要農業政策結合,不僅提升參與度,亦可以促進其他政策推動。臺灣也應參考美國、日本及韓國訂定明確法源依據,兼顧產險公司及農民權益。
本研究接著分析及評估影響臺灣農作物保險實施效益之因素,調查對象為臺中市及苗栗縣梨農,以邏輯迴歸分析受訪者背景與購買需求、購買行為及購買意願之關聯性,結果顯示經營面積越大者越覺得需要且較可能實際購買保險,教育程度越高者及非農業收入佔整體經濟收入比例越低者以後購買保險的可能性越高。為使保險制度有效推展,可將經營面積較大、農業以外收入佔整體收入比例較低、教育程度較高之農民視為潛在客群優先推廣,帶動其他農民投入。分析受訪者對梨保險的認知,結果顯示農民已熟悉農會為主要訊息來源,政府可妥善運用地方農會作為有利媒介;而調查認為需要農作物保險之原因,依據結果推測臺灣天災頻繁、救助制度保障不足、梨單價高、一年一收且受訪者以專業農居多可成為臺灣持續推動梨保險的契機。受訪者最在意承保風險及保費,未購買者也認為保費太高是主因,因此商品開發需評估農民接受度,並以政府補助保費來提升誘因,又多數農民尚未完全了解農作物保險,認為制度設計太複雜、宣傳頻率太低及解說方式不易理解,應積極以淺顯易懂方式透過農民熟悉的管道溝通。 此外,受訪者中曾購買的18位農民多數購買「政府災助連結型」,本身對保險制度產生認同感,顯示推動初期農民較願意接受與原先救助制度相似的商品,購買者對保險公司的整體服務滿意度最高,理賠金的發放速度滿意度最低,多表示會繼續也會建議或鼓勵別人購買,願意支持保險制度。又去年寒害使投保者多有領到理賠金,能確實感受到投保的好處。未來政府及保險公司勘災作業效率會隨經驗累積而改善提升,藉由農民口耳相傳可逐漸提高投保率,逐步建立農作物保險觀念。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Taiwan frequently suffers from typhoons, torrential rain in summer and autumn and cold damage in winter, which cause severe agricultural loss. To give agricultural operators more protection, Council of Agriculture, Executive Yuan has established crop insurance scheme in 2015. This scheme started from top-grafted pears, then expanded to all kinds of pears, and insurance for mangos and revenue insurance for sugar apples have also been implemented. Although crop insurance scheme in Taiwan is still in early stage, these commercial products have already showed their diversification. This study first analyzed the condition of agricultural insurance among nations, found out that many measures were necessary in early development to maintain insurance policy, including increasing premium subsidy support, cancelling other relief measures, gaining other supports from government only if you are participants, forced to participate if the cultivated areas exceed, investment from experienced foreign company, developing diversified products and propagating through many ways. Premium subsidy can also be linked up with other important agricultural policies, which not only enhance penetration ratio but push other policies forward. Our government should refer to the U.S.A., Japan and Korea as well to draw up a specific law, in order to protect both insurance companies and farmers.
After that, this study evaluated the factors affecting agricultural insurance implementation results in Taiwan from a survey questionnaire given to top-grafted pears farmers in Taichung City and Miaoli County, and logistic regression model is used to analyze the correlation between farmers' background and their need, behavior and desire of purchase. The results indicated that the farmers who cultivate more area are more likely to feel need and purchase crop insurance, the better-educated farmers and who have less off-farm income are more willing to purchase in the future. To promote crop insurance scheme effectively, we can take those producers as potential consumers, and they may bring others to join crop insurance scheme together. Then this study also analyzed the observations' understanding of pear insurance, it suggested that government can take farmers' association as advantageous channel to release policy because farmers are quite familiar with it, and it also showed that high frequency of natural disasters, insufficiency of relief system's protection, high market price of pears, single harvest season per year and farmers are mostly professional are all favorable factors for policy execution. Respondents care most about the risks that insurance cover and premium, those who didn't purchase also agree that high premium is the main reason, therefore, insurance products should meet farmers' acceptability, and be raised purchase incentives by subsidy from government. Besides, most participants in this survey haven't understood crop insurance scheme completely because of complicated design, low frequency of extension and commentated ways can't be understood easily, government should communicate with farmers in easier ways and through channels which they are familiar with. Moreover, most of the 18 respondents who have purchased crop insurance chose the kind of products which is linked up with relief system, and approved insurance policy, it revealed that farmers are more likely to accept the products which are similar to original relief system. The consumers have highest satisfaction toward service of insurance company but lowest satisfaction toward indemnity release, and most of them are willing to purchase again and will encourage others to purchase. In addition, participants can truly feel the advantages that crop insurance brings because many of them obtained indemnity due to severe cold damage last year. In the future, the efficiency of crop insurance scheme will be improved because of ample experiences, and the penetration ratio will be increased gradually as well. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-13T06:40:53Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-106-R01621115-1.pdf: 1782929 bytes, checksum: e3188a4367eafa244f20e6b098b76688 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員審定書...............................i
誌謝.......................................ii 中文摘要...................................iii 英文摘要.....................................v 圖目錄....................................viii 表目錄......................................ix 第一章 緒論...................................1 第一節 研究背景與動機..........................1 第二節 研究目的 ...............................4 第三節 研究之重要性............................5 第二章 文獻回顧................................6 第一節 何謂保險................................6 第二節 各國農作物保險制度......................10 第三節 探討影響農作物保險實施效益之因素.........32 第四節 臺灣農業天然災害救助及保險制度的發展現況..35 第三章 研究方法與結果..........................42 第一節 研究對象...............................42 第二節 研究設計與方法..........................44 第三節 研究結果與討論..........................47 第四章 結論與建議..............................61 參考文獻......................................65 附錄..........................................72 附錄一 農業天然災害救助辦法.....................72 附錄二 農產業天然災害保險試辦補助要點............84 附錄三 釋迦收入保險試辦及補助辦法................87 附錄四 農作物天然災害保險問卷設計................93 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 影響臺灣農作物保險實施效益之因素評估與分析 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Evaluation and Analysis of Factors Affecting Crop Insurance Implementation Results in Taiwan | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 105-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 許明晃,楊志維,黃盟元 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 農作物保險,農業天然災害救助制度,梨農作物保險,芒果農作物保險,釋迦收入保險,邏輯迴歸模型, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | crop insurance,agricultural natural disaster relief system,crop insurance for pears,crop insurance for mangos,revenue insurance for sugar apples,logistic regression model, | en |
dc.relation.page | 99 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201701434 | |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
dc.date.accepted | 2017-07-12 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 農藝學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 農藝學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-106-1.pdf | 1.74 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。