請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/24641
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 張睿詒(Ray-E Chang) | |
dc.contributor.author | Hsueh-Yin Wu | en |
dc.contributor.author | 吳雪穎 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T05:34:36Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2005-02-03 | |
dc.date.issued | 2005 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2005-01-31 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 參考文獻
1. Patterson PP. Cost Accounting in Hospitals and Clinical Laboratories:Part III. Clinical Laboratory Management Review, 1989:May/June:151-57 2. Scinto LD. Product Cost in the Clinical Laboratory. Hospital Cost Management and Accounting, 1989:1:7:1-8 3. Travers EM. Clinical Laboratory Management . Williams & Wilkins.1997 4. Dick HM. Costing of Pathology Services in the United Kingdom National Health Service. Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1991:44:705-709 5. Ash KO. Impact of Cost Cutting on Laboratories:New Bueiness Strategies for Laboratories. Clinical Chemistry, 1996:42(5):822-826 6. Morrison RL. As We See It-Cost Accounting in the Laboratory. Clinical Laboratory Management Review, 1996:Jan/Feb:67-70 7. Brezmes MF, Ochoa C, Eiros JM. Cost Analysis in a Clinical Microbiology Laboratory. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2002:21:582-88 8. Finkler SA. Horizontal Accounting Considered for the Hospital Setting. Hospital Cost Management and Accounting. 1997:8(2):1-7 9. Kaplan R , Cooper R. Cost & Effect:Using Integrated Cost System to Drive Profitability and Performance. Boston:Harvard Business School Press. 1998 10. Cokins G, Activity-Based Cost Management:An Executive’s Guide. John Wiley & Sons, 2001 11. Baker JJ, Activity-Based Costing and Activity-Based Management for Health Care. Aspen Publishers, Inc., 1998. 12. Gordts B, The Containment of Cost of Health Care. Acta Chir Belg 1996:96:56-58 13. Holmes RL, Schroeder RE, ABC estimation of Unit Costs for Emergency Department Services. J Ambulatory Care Management 1996:19(2):22-31 14. West TD, Balas EA, West DA, Contrasting RCC, RVU, and ABC for Managed Care Decisions. Healthcare Financial Management 1996:50(8):54-61 15. Udpa S, Activity-Based Costing for Hospitals. Health Care Management Review 1996:21(3):83-96 16. Baker JJ, Boyd GF, Activity-Based Costing in the Operating Room at Valley View Hospital. J Health Care Finance 1997:24(1):1-9 17. Alanen A, Keski-Nisula L, Laurila J et al. Cost of Plain-Film Radiography in a Partially Digitized Radiology Department:An Activity-Based Cost Analysis. Acta Radiologica 1998:39:200-207 18. Kobeissi BJ, Gupta M et al. Physician Resource Utilization in Radiation Oncology:A Model Based on Management of Carcinoma of the Prostate. Int J Radiation Oncology Biol Phys 1998:40(3):593-603 19. Zeller TL, Senagore AJ, Siegel G, Manage Indirect Practice Expense the Way You Practice Medicine:With Information. Dis Colon Rectum 1999:42(5):579-589 20. Cohen MD, Hawes DR et al. Activity-Based Cost Analysis:A Method of Analyzing the Finantial and Operating Performance of Academic Radiology Department. Radiology 2000:215(3):708-716 21. Laurila J, Suramo I et al. Activity-Based Costing in Radiology:Application in a Pediatric Radiological Unit. Acta Radiologica 2000:41:189-195 22. Nisenbaum HL, Birnbaum BA et al. The Cost of CT Procedures in an Academic Radiology Department Determined by an Activity-Based Costing(ABC) Method. J Computer Assisted Tomography 2000:24(5):813-823 23. Gaster AL, Slothuus U et al. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Intravascular Ultrasound Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention versus Conventional Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Scand Cardiovasc J 2001:35:80-85 24. Ridderstolpe L, Johansson A et al. Clinical Process Analysis and Activity-Based Costing at a Heart Center. J Med Sys 2002:26(4):309-322 25. Grandlish C. Using Activity-Based Costing in Surgery. AORN J 2004:79(1):189-192 26. 黃雅貞,運用作業基礎成本改善放射診斷部門之成本管理。台灣大學醫療機構管理研究所碩士論文,2002。 27. 張文成,建立手術室之多層級作業基礎成本與管理制度。台灣大學醫療機構管理研究所碩士論文,2002。 28. 劉怡芬,建置管理決策之作業基礎成本與管理系統-某醫學中心臨床病理部門為例。台灣大學醫療機構管理研究所碩士論文,2003。 29. Brimson JA, Antos J. Activity-Based Management-For Service Industries, Government Entities, and Nonprofit Organizations. John Wiley & Sons Inc.. NY, USA, 1994 30. College of American Pathologists:Manual for Laboratory Workload Recording Method. College of American Pathologists, 1989 31. Wilson ML. Clinically Relevant, Cost-Effective Clinical Microbiology:Strategies to Decrease Unnecessary Testing. AJCP 1997:107(2):154-167 32. Dufour DR. Clinical Use of Laboratory Data—A Practical Guide, Williams & Wilkins. 1998. 33. Sewell DL and MacLowry JD. Laboratory Management. Manual of Clinical Microbiology, 8th ed.:ASM press. 2003. 34. McLaughlin J. The Implementation of Cost-effectiveness, Clinically Relevant Diagnostic Microbiology Policies:the Approach. Clin. Microbiol. Newsl. 1995. 17:70-71 35. NCCLS. 1999. Continuous Quality Improvement:Essential Management Approaches and Their Use in Proficiency Testing, GP22-A. NCCLS. Wayne, Pa. 36. Robinson A. Rationale for Cost-Effective Laboratory Medicine. Clin Microbiol Reviews, 1994:7:185-199 37. Valenstein P. Managing Physician Use of Laboratory Test. Clin. Lab. Med. 1996:16:749-771 38. Shea YR. Specimen Collection and Transport, p.1.1.1-1.1.30. In H. D. Isenberg(ed.), Clinical Microbiology Procedure Handbook, vol.1. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D. C. 1992. 39. HCFA(Health Care Financing Administration). CLIA’88(Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988;final rule). Fed. Regist. 57:7137-7186. 1992. 40. IOM(Institute of Medicine). To Err Is Human:Building a Safer Health System. National Academy Press, Washington, D. C. 2000. 41. IOM(Institute of Medicine). Crossing the Quality Chasm:A New Health System for the 21st Century. National Academy Press, Washington, D. C. 2001. 42. Hernandez JS. Cost-Effectiveness of Laboratory Testing. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2003:127:440-445 43. Fryback DG & Thornbury JR. The Efficacy of Diagnostic Imaging. Med Decis Making. 1991:11:88-94 44. Pfister J. Public Health Application of New Laboratory Technologies for Communicable Diseases. Results. Spring 1997. 45. Bissell MG. 2000. Introduction:what’s in a laboratory outcome? Charp. 1. in Bissell M. G.(editor). Laboratory-related measurements of patient outcomes:an introduction. Washington, DC:AACC Press. 46. Vanderlaan B. 1996. Cost-effectiveness vs. clinical benefits. Clin. Lab. News. Dec:18 47. Wilkinson DS. 2000. Technology assessment:measuring the outcomes of laboratory practice. Clin. Leadership & Management Review. Nov/Dec. 48. Eddy DM. 1990. Screening for cervical cancer. Ann. Intern. Med. 113:214 49. Frankenfield DL. 1999. Racial/ethnic analysis of selected intermediate outcomes for hemodialysis patients:results from the 1997 ESRD Core Indicators Project. Am. J. Kidney Dis, Vol. 34, No. 4:721-730 50. Frankenfield DL. 2003. Differences in intermediate outcomes for Asian and non-Asian adult hemodialysis patients in the United States. Kidney International, Vol. 64:623-631 51. Berardis GD. 2004. Quality of care and outcomes in type 2 diabetes patients. Diabetes Care, 27:398-406 52. NCCLS(National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards). 1998. Cost Accounting in the Clinical Laboratory, GP-11A. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa. 53. 董玉麟,國內五百大製造業品質成本實施現況與運作效益之探討。台灣大學工業工程研究所碩士論文,2000。 54. Evans JR & Lindsay WM. The Management and Control of Quality. 5th edi. South-Western, Thomson Learning. 2002 55. Stiles RA. & Mick SS. 「What is the cost of controlling quality? ABC accounting offers an answer.」 Hosp. Health Serv Adm. 1997 Summer;42(2):193-204 56. Finkler SA. 「TQM:cost accounting specifics. Part 2.」 Hosp Cost Manag Account. 1993 Sep;5(6):1-7 57. Finkler SA. 「Essentials of Cost Accounting for Health Care Organizations」 1994 58. Windemuth DS. 「Using cost accounting techniques in the TQM framework.」 Hosp Cost Manag Account. 1993 Apr;5(1):1-8 59. Dixon R.& Trenchard PM. 「A theoretical evaluation of the role of precision and quality in clinical costings.」 Health Care Manage Rev. 1996 Spring;21(2):7-15 60. Trenchard PM. & Dixon R. The practice of quality-associated costing:application to transfusion manufacturing processes. Qual Manag Health Care. 1997 Summer;5(4):53-65 61. Latzer DB. Total Quality Management:An Application in a Biomedical Laboratory. Hosp Cost Manag & Accounting, 1997:9(2),1-6 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/24641 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 前言:近年來,健保支付制度朝向前瞻式預算之發展,醫療照護的財務風險漸漸轉移至醫療提供者。醫院要在如此財務困難的環境下,又必須提供患者高品質的照護,管理者紛紛要求各部門自行做好成本管理及持續品質改進。細菌組是檢驗部門中一個較偏向客製化生產方式的工作單位,耗用大量人力從事細菌培養,相對於其他部門,檢驗結果有無長菌不僅深切影響病患疾病的治療方向,且所耗用的資源差異很大。然而過去大多數醫院所用之傳統成本方法產生之報表係以部門別而非流程分析為主,並未能呈現出此類檢驗成本的差異性。而ABC/M強調從流程觀點,藉由分析流程及其組成之作業,使管理者了解成本流向,以及流程改善之機會,故本研究欲藉由作業基礎成本與管理(ABC/M)之新成本管理工具,以某醫學中心檢驗部門細菌組為對象,建構一套提供流程與作業持續改善之成本管理系統,以提昇該部門的成本管理。
材料與方法:本研究為一個案研究,以台北地區某財團法人醫學中心檢驗科細菌室為研究對象。個案醫院病床總數約800床,佔床率約為九成。研究資料取自該院89年之會計報表及細菌室當年之檢體總量。研究範圍包括細菌檢驗前之收受檢體、檢體處理,檢驗中之種菌培養、菌種鑑定、藥物敏感試驗、確認結果,及檢驗後之發報告等作業流程。並以ABC/M之架構從事流程與成本分析。 結果:個案醫院細菌室於89年全年檢體量有26884件,共耗用成本8,035,219元,其中以試藥耗材費用佔總成本最多,佔57.5%,其次為人力成本,佔39.2%,各項作業成本分別為「準備與行政作業」,佔總成本7.00%,檢驗中之「培養檢體」作業佔50.97%,「一般細菌鑑定」作業佔27.10%,「抗藥試驗」作業佔7.28%,「黴菌鑑定」作業僅佔0.20 %,其他作業如「教學研究」佔3.83%及「品管」作業佔0.27 %,由作業成本可得知細菌檢驗作業資源耗用於各類檢體之分布,亦可瞭解各項檢驗之單位成本及其獲利情形,並分析資源浪費與成本改善機會 結論:本研究利用ABC/M成本方法建構一可衡量客製化之累加成本系統,藉由此系統之流程與作業分析所產生之資訊,使用於持續性改善之工作,包括降低內外部品質失敗成本,增加作業效率,以及檢驗利用效能改善。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | National health insurance policy has been developed toward prospective payment systems these years. The financial risk has been gradually transferred to those who provide health care. Under these harsh circumstances, hospitals also have to offer patients high quality care. Thus, hospital managers request every department to control cost and keep improving quality as well as possible. The microbiology laboratory is the work unit which more relates to the production way of job-shop. Comparing it to other departments, it consumes a large amount of manpower on cultivating microorganisms. The results coming up with bacteria or no bacteria affect not only the cure way on diseases of patients but also the consumption of resources.
For years, most hospitals used the traditional cost accounting system which emphasized on differentiating department profits rather than analyzing working process. ABC/M(activity-based costing and management)system however put emphases on the view of process. It lets managers understand the flow of costs and the improvement opportunities of process by analyzing activities in the process. Thus, this study tried to construct a cost management system which is able to provide improvement opportunities of process and activities by means of ABC/M application. It took an clinical laboratory department as the subject and tried to advance its cost management. This is a case study. The subject of the study was a microbiology laboratory of a medical center in Taipei. The data were collected from the accounting report of 2000 of the hospital and the total amount of specimens received in the laboratory. This hospital contained about 800 beds with an occupied rate of 90%. The research method was applying the framework of ABC/M to analyze the microbiology laboratory operation activities and the related costs. Based on the ABC/M principles, 7 activities were defined in the laboratory. The results show that while reagents and materials accounted for 57.5% of the total cost, labor and allocated overhead accounted for 39.2% and 3%, respectively. As for activity cost, specimen culture and bacteria identification activities consumed the major portion of the total cost at 51% and 27%. Antibiotic susceptibility testing, administrating and preparing, teaching and research, quality control, and fungal identification were all less than 10%. We also obtained the total costs and every single test cost of different kind specimens respectively, including revenue, costs, and gross profits. Through analyzing the cost information and standard operating procedures of the laboratory, we found the failure cost because of improper use of blood culture and excessive resource consumption in bacteria identification(ID)procedure. For lowering failure cost and improving ID procedure, we implemented continuous quality improvement strategies—including education training course and taking QCC action. After that, the failure cost decreased to 4.5% of the next year from 15.3% of the previous year, and saved bacteria ID cost about NT$ 90,000/y by changing Aci. baumannii ID SOP. The conclusion of this study was to prove:first, we applied ABC/M to construct an additive cost system which can more precisely measure cost of the customized products in the microbiology laboratory. Second, by using this ABC/M system, we found the non-value-added process and help make decisions to eliminate it. Last, with the information produced by work process analysis of this system, the microbiology laboratory management can be continuously improved including reducing the failure cost, increasing the operation efficiency, adjusting laboratory testing utilization. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T05:34:36Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-94-P91843001-1.pdf: 473527 bytes, checksum: 4b61718f8c2b333992573d2042c6c28b (MD5) Previous issue date: 2005 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 目 錄
致謝………………………………………………………………………………..i 中文摘要…………………………………………………………………………..ii 英文摘要…………………………………………………………………………..iv 目錄………………………………………………………………….…………….vi 圖目錄……………………………………………………………………………..vii 表目錄……………………………………………………………………………..vii 第一章 前言………………………………………………………….………….1 第二章 材料與方法…………………………………………………….………..3 第三章 結果……………………………………………………………………...7 第四章 討論……………………………………………………………………...10 參考文獻……………………………………………………………………………26 附錄(Appendix): 文獻探討……………………………………………………………………………32 圖目錄 圖一 個案醫院檢驗科組織圖……………………………………………………13 圖二 Gram Negative Bacilli(GNB)鑑定流程示意圖…………………………14 圖三 細菌檢驗標準作業流程圖…………………………………………………15 圖四 細菌室ABC/M作業架構圖……………………………………………….16 附錄圖………………………………………………………………………………60 表目錄 表一 腸內菌鑑定次作業適用之菌種(例)……………………………………17 表二 細菌檢驗作業、作業動因及其成本分布…………………………………18 表三 細菌檢驗獲利分析…………………………………………………………20 表四 細菌室人力產能分析………………………………………………………21 表五 以血液培養為例耗材浪費分析……………………………………………22 表六 血液培養浪費及污染改善情形……………………………………………23 表七 AB菌鑑定作業流程改善後成本改善分析………………………………..24 表八 血液培養結果陽性率提昇節省成本分析…………………………………25 附錄表………………………………………………………………………………64 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 建立細菌室持續性改善之成本系統―以某醫學中心為例 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Developing a Continuous Improvement Costing System in a Medical Center's Microbiology Laboratory | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 93-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 闕宗熙(Tzong-Shi Chiueh),高全良(Chuan-Liang Kao) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 作業基礎成本管理, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | ABC/M, | en |
dc.relation.page | 65 | |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2005-01-31 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 公共衛生學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 醫療機構管理研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 健康政策與管理研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-94-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 462.43 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。