請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/24585
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 楊朝成 | |
dc.contributor.author | Yu-Chun Chen | en |
dc.contributor.author | 陳禹君 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T05:32:04Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2005-07-04 | |
dc.date.issued | 2005 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2005-06-24 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Amihud, Y. and H. Mendelson, 1986, Asset Pricing and the Bid-Ask Spread, Journal of Financial Economics, (December), pp. 223-249.
Baker, Kent H., Gary E. Powell and Daniel G. Weaver, Does NYSE Listing Affect Firm Visibility? Financial Management; Summer 1999; 28, 2; pp. 46-54. Baker, Kent H., Gary E. Powell and Daniel G. Weaver, Listing Changes and Visibility Gains, Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics; Winter 1999; 38, 1. pp. 46-63. Baker, H Kent , John R Nofsinger, Daniel G Weaver., 2002, International cross-listing and visibility Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. Seattle: Sep 2002.Vol.37, Iss. 3; pg. 495, 27 pgs Baker, Kent H. and Richard B. Edelman, The Effects on Spread and Volume of Switching to the Nasdaq National Market System, Financial Analyst Journal; Jan/Feb 1992; 48, 1; pp. 83-88. Baker, Kent H. and Richard B. Edelman, AMEX-to-NYSE Transfers, Market Microstructure, and Shareholder Wealth, Financial Management; Winter 1992; 21, 4; pp. 60-72. Black, Ervin L., Joseph Legoria, and Keith F. Sellers, Capital Investment Effects of Dividend Imputation. The Journal of the American Taxation association, Fall 2000, Vol. 22, No. 2, 40-59. Blose, Laurence E. and Joseph C.P. Shieh, 1997, Tobin’s q-ratio and market reaction to capital investment announcements, The Financial Review Vol. 32 No. 3, 449-476 Brainard, William C. and James Tobin, 1968, Pitfalls in financial model building, American Economic Review 58, 99-122 Calem, Paul S. and John A. Rizzo, 1995, Financing constraints and investment: new evidence from hospital industry data, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking Vol. 27 No. 4, 1002-1014. Calomiris, Charles W. and Glenn Hubbard, Internal Finance and Investment: Evidence from the Undistributed Profits Tax of 1936-37. The Journal of Business, Vol. 68, No. 4 (Oct., 1995), 443-482. Dharan, Bala G. and David L. Ikenberry, The Long-Run Negative Drift of Post-Listing Stock Returns, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 50, No. 5(Dec, 1995), pp. 1547-1574. Devereux, Michael, Fabio Schiantarelli, 1989, Investment, financial factors and cash flow: evidence from UK panel data, NBER working paper No. 3116. Eledman Richard B. and Kent H. Baker, 1990, Liquidity and Stock Exchange Listing, Financial Review (May), pp. 231-249. Faroque, Akheter and T. Ton-That, 1995, Financing constraints and firm heterogeneity in investment behavior: and application of non-nested tests, Applied ECONOMICS 27, 317-326 Fazzari, Steven M., R. Gleen Hubard, Bruce C. Petersen, 1988, Financing constraints Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 141-206. Fazzari, Steven M., R. Glen Hubbard, Bruce C. Petersen, 1996, Asymmetric information, financing constraints and investment, Review of Economics and Statistics Vol. 69 No. 3, 481-488 Fazzari, Steven M, R. Glenn Hubbard, Bruce C. Petersen, 1996, Financing constraints and corporate investment: response to Kaplan and Zingales, NBER working paper No. 5462. Galeotti, Marzio, Fabio Schiantarelli and Fidel Jaramillo, 1994, Investment decisions and the role of debt, liquid assets and cash flow: evidence from Italian panel data, Applied Financial Economics 4, 121-132. Gilchrist, Simon, Charles P. Himmelberg, 1995, Evidence on the role of cash flow for investment, Journal of Monetary Economics 36, 541-572. Gomes, Joao F., 2001, Financing investment, The American Economic Review, Dec., Vol. 91, Iss. 5, p. 1263-1285. Grammatikos, T. and G. Papajoannou, 1986, Market Reaction to NYSE Listings: Tests of the Marketability Gains Hypothesis, Journal of Financial Research (Fall), pp. 215-227. Green, W. H. 1992, Limdep-user’s manual and reference guide, New York: Econometric Software, Inc. Hayshi Fumio, 1982, Tobin’s marginal q and average q: A neoclassical interpretation, Econometrica Vol. 50 No. 1, 213-224 Hoshi, Takeo, Anil Kashyap, David Scharfstein, 1991, Corporate structure, liquiity and investment: evidence from Japanese industrial groups, Quarterly Journal of Economics 106, 33-60. Jahera, John, William Lloyd, and Naval Modani, 1986, Growth, beta and agency costs as determinants of dividend, Akron Business and Economic Review, Vol; 17, 55-69. Jose, Manual L., Len M. Nichols and Jerry L. Stevens, 1986, Contributions of diversification promotion and R&D tot he value of multiproduct firms: a Tobin’s q approach, Financial Management 15, 33-42. Kaplan, Steven N. and Luigi Zingales, 1995, Do financing constraints explain why investment is correlated with cash flow?, Working Paper No. 5267, National Bureau of Economic Research. Kaplan, Steven N. and Luigi Zingales, 1997, Do investment-cash flow sensitivities provide useful measures of financing constraints? Quarterly Journal of Economics 1, 169-215. Lamont, Owen, 1997, Cash flow and investment: evidence from internal capital markets, Journal of Finance Vol. LII NO. 1, 83-109. Lamont, Owen, Christopher Polk, and Saa-Requejo, 2001, Financial Constraints and Stock Returns, The Review of Financial Studies (Summer), Vol. 14, no.2. pp. 529-554. Lang, Larry, Eli Ofek and Rene M. Stulz, 1996, Leverage, investment and firm growth, Journal of Financial Economics 40, 3-29. Lee, Bong-Soo, Tom Nohel, 1997, Value maximization and the information content of corporate investment with respect to earnings, Journal of Banking and Financing 21, 661-683. Lewellen, Wibur G., S. G. Badrinah, 1997, On the measurement of Tobin’s q, Journal of Financial Economics 44, 77-122. Lindenberg, Eric B. and Stephen A. Ross, Tobin’s q ratio and industrial organization, Journal of Business 54, 1-32. Lintner J., 1956, Distribution of incomes of corporations among dividends retained earnings and taxed, American Economic Review. Miller, Merton and Franco Modigliani, 1961, Dividend policy, growth and the valuation of shares, Journal of Business. Modigliani, Franco and Merton Miller, 1958, The cost of capital, corporation finance and the theory of investment, American Economic Review 8, 261-297 Myers, Stewart C. and Nicholas S. Majluf, 1984, Corporate Financing decisions when firms have investment information the investors do not, Journal of Financial Economics 13, 187-221. Partington, Garaham H., 1987, Variables influencing dividend policy in Australia: Survey results, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, Vol. 16, 165-182. Pertersen M. A. and R. G. Rajan, 1994, The Benefits of Lending Relationships: Evidence from Small Business Data, Journal of Finance, Vol. 49, p.3-37. Ploetscher, Caludia and Host Rottmann, 2002, Investment Behavior and Financing Constraints in German Manufacturing and Construction Firms – A Bivariate Ordered Probit Estimation, IFO-Studien, Berlin, Vol. 48, Iss. 3, p.383-400. Ramirez, Carlos D., 1995, Did J. P. Morgan’s men add liquidity? Corporate investment, cash flow ad financial structure at the turn o the twentieth century, Journal of Finance Vol. L No. 2, 661-678. Roseff, Michael S., 1982, Growth, beta, and agency cost as determinants of dividend payout ratios, Journal of Financial Research, Vol. 5, 249-259. Schaller, Huntley, 1993, Asymmetric information, liquidity constraints and Canadian investment, Canadian Journal of Economics 26, No. 3, 552-574. Stiglitz, Joseph and Andrew Weiss, 1981, Credit rationing in markets with imperfect information, American Economic Review 71, 393-401. Tinbergen, Jan., 1939, A method and its application to investment activity, In Statistical Testing of Business Cycle Theories Vol. 1. Tobin, James, 1969, A general equilibrium approach to monetary theory, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 1, 15-29. Whited, Toni M. 1992, Debt, liquidity constraints and corporate investment: evidence from panel data, Journal of Finance Vol. XL, VII, 1425-1460. Yang, Lin and Lu, “Investment Strategy, Dividend Policy and Financial Constraints of the Firm,” Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies; 2000; vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 235-267. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/24585 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本文主要在探討國內上櫃公司轉上市的行為是否影響其融資限制程度。本文採用複迴歸分析,研究期間與樣本為民國八十九年至九十一年提出申請上市的上櫃公司。
關於國內上櫃公司轉上市前後的融資限制程度,本文的研究結果是,上櫃轉上市的行為確實會影響公司融資限制的程度,轉上市後的融資限制程度有升高的傾向,可能解釋方向包括: 一、公司經理人選擇在公司表現最好的時候轉上市,轉上市之後表現就變差,因此融資限制的程度反而提高了,也就是公司經理人選擇轉上市的時機影響轉上市後的融資限制程度; 二、公司轉上市後透明度增加,不確定性降低,資訊不對稱的程度也降低,使得公司資金成本下降,公司可行的投資增加,投資金額也增加,於是融資限制就因而提高了; 三、公司轉上市後一年,投資大部分依賴內部現金流量,原因可能是為了轉上市已付出相當高的成本,建構公司美好的願景,因此轉上市後一年無力做大型投資。 此外,針對符合上市資格但選擇留在上櫃的公司,與轉上市公司的融資限制程度的差異,結果發現,差異在轉上市當年是顯著的,轉上市前後兩年不顯著,轉上市影響融資限制程度的效果似乎是短暫的。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | This paper aims to answer the question: “Does the transferring from OTC to the Exchange alleviate a firm’s extent of financial constraints?” Baker, Powell and Weaver (1999) indicate that the motives for firms to switch to a larger exchange include management’s desire to improve a firm’s visibility and prestige, to signal its confidence in the firm’s future performance, and to improve liquidity and marketability. These benefits of switching may enable firms to alleviate their degree of financing constraints by reduced information asymmetry and risk. Financing constraints, as defined by Lamont, Polk and Saa-Requejo (2001) are frictions that prevent the firm from funding all desired investments, or “the inability to fund investment due to credit constraints or inability to borrow, inability to issue equity, dependence on bank loans, or illiquidity of assets.” We use the Fazzari, Hubbers and Peterson (1988) cash flow model to examine whether the switch of OTC firms to the TSE affects firms’ financing constraints. Samples of Taiwanese firms for the period 1998-2003 are used for the study.
Based on the empirical results we analyzed, the new requirement of transferring could help us tell the degree of financing constraints between the stayers and other firms unqualified of applying for transferring in the OTC market. Besides, the tests on whether the switch affects the degree of financing constraints show that the degree of financing constraints gets worse significantly after switching. The reason may be that firms’ visibility and reputation are enhanced, therefore uncertainty reduced and cost of capital reduced. Lower cost of capital may induce firms to invest more and hence may increase their degree of financing constraint. In other words, the increases of visibility and liquidity from switching may not have monotonic relationship with the degree of financing constraints that firms suffer. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T05:32:04Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-94-R92723037-1.pdf: 508187 bytes, checksum: f31fac794b75c3956b34cad239eb75d7 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2005 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | Contents
Introduction 6 Introduction to Taiwan’s Stock Markets 8 Differences between the OTC and the TSE 12 Differences of the Requirements for Listing between the OTC and the TSE 12 Differences in Liquidity between the OTC and the TSE 12 Differences in Returns and Volatility between the OTC and the TSE 12 Differences in Investments and Financing Behavior between the OTC and the TSE 13 Literature on Listing Changes and Financing Constraints 13 Research Methodology 19 Hypotheses 19 Data Sources 21 Financial Models 21 Data Descriptions 24 Empirical Results 26 Empirical results in hypothesis 1-a: Firms on the OTC and firms on the TSE have the same investment sensitivity to opportunities. 26 Empirical results in hypothesis 1-b: Firms on the OTC and firms on the TSE have the same extent of financial constraints. 26 Empirical results in hypothesis 1-c: High-dividend-payout and Low-dividend-payout group have the same investment sensitivity to opportunities and the same extent of financial constraints on either the OTC or the TSE. 29 Empirical results in hypothesis 2: The switch of OTC firms to the Exchange will not affect the investment sensitivity to opportunities and the degree of financial constraints. 32 Empirical results in hypothesis 3: Switchers and stayers exhibit same investment sensitivity to opportunities and degree of financial constraints. 35 Conclusions 42 References 45 Appendix I 50 Appendix II 55 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 公司上櫃轉上市行為是否影響其融資限制程度
–針對台灣股票市場之實證研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Does the Switch from OTC to the Exchange Alleviate a Firm’s Extent of Financial Constraints – A Case of Taiwan Stock Market | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 93-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 邱靖博,陳聖賢 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 上櫃轉上市,融資限制, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Listing change,Financing constraints, | en |
dc.relation.page | 62 | |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2005-06-24 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 財務金融學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 財務金融學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-94-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 496.28 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。