請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/24580
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 練乃華 | |
dc.contributor.author | Yi-Ru Chen | en |
dc.contributor.author | 陳怡如 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T05:31:51Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2005-07-04 | |
dc.date.issued | 2005 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2005-06-26 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 一、中文部分
1.王又鵬(1993),「促銷活動對消費者購買行為影響之研究」,政治大學企業管理研究所博士論文。 2.王旭民(1995),「參考價格建構方式、脈絡線索對消費者價格認知的影響」,中央大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。 3.王慧馨,「東森購物 跨足嬰童商品」,《經濟日報》,2004/12/13,A15版。 4.江宏祥(1995),「有線電視購物頻道消費者決策模式之研究」,交通大學傳播科技研究所碩士論文。 5.李秉倫(2001),「折扣深度、產品屬性與促銷情境對品牌評價與購買意願影響之研究」,銘傳大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。 6.李尚華,「中華郵政點火 物流業割喉戰 一觸即發」,《工商時報》,2004/12/22,第四版。 7.李佳勳(2004),「探討數量稀少性對個人決策偏離原有偏好之影響」,中央大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。 8.李姿瑢(2002),「價格折扣幅度、品牌形象、促銷原因及價格促銷推測動機對認知價值及購買意願之影響」,實踐大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。 9.李海容(1997),「大陸電視購物的特點與前景」,《廣告學研究》,第九集,政治大學廣告系出版,頁89。 10.呂金龍(2000),「The Effects of Product Scarcity, Advertising Appeals, and Desire for Unique Consumer Products on Advertising Effectiveness」,台灣科技大學管理研究所企業管理學程碩士論文。 11.邱莉玲,「東森得易購宋湘嵐vs.富邦媒體科技林啟峰」,《工商時報》,2005/04/19,第二十五版。 12.陳怡伶(2004),「電視購物頻道與製造商品牌聯盟對知覺品質之影響」,臺灣師範大學大眾傳播研究所碩士論文。 13.陳延昇,「電視購物作先鋒,東森拉長無店鋪零售戰線」,《數位時代雙週》,第42期。 14.郭奕伶,「一天營收一億的電視購物傳奇」,《商業週刊》,第854期,頁80。 15.張俊惠,(2000),「消費者對資訊線索來源使用差異之研究-構建式觀點」,臺灣大學商學研究所博士論文。 16.張鎮安,「shopping@TV」,《數位時代雙週》,第49期。 17.許智誠(1998),「廠商之促銷目的與促銷事件誘因特性關聯性研究-以專家及消費者觀點探討」,中原大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。 18.莊麗卿譯(1992),「實用促銷手冊」(原著Schultz & Robinson),遠流出版社。 19.程予誠(1995),「線纜傳播」,五南出版公司。 20.黃鳴棟(2003),「虛擬通路產業的經營模式與競爭策略分析:以『電視購物』為例」,台灣科技大學管理研究所碩士論文。 21.黃麗霞(2002),「贈品促銷型式對消費者的知覺價值與購買意願之影響」,臺灣大學商學研究所博士論文。 22.楊志弘(1998),「台灣地區有線電視頻導總覽」,傳莘雜誌社。 23.劉美琪(2004),「行銷傳播概論」,雙葉書廊有限公司。 24.蔡國棟(1995),「有線電視購物頻道的媒介環境之研究—媒介系統依賴理論之觀點」,交通大學傳播研究所碩士論文。 二、英文部分 1.Aaker, D. A. (1973), “Toward a Normative Model of Promotional Decision Making,” Management Science, Vol.19, pp.593-603. 2.Ahituv, N., M. Igbaria, and A. Sella (1998), “The Effect of Time Pressure and Completeness of Information on Decision Making,” Journal of Management Information System, Vol.15, pp.153-172. 3.Alba, J. W. and J. W. Hutchinson (1987), “Dimensions of Consumer Expertise,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.13, pp.411-454 4.Ben-Zur, H. and S. J. Breznitz (1981), “The Effects of Time Pressure on Risky Choice Behavior,” Acta Psychologica, Vol.47, pp.89-104. 5.Berkowitz, E. N. and J. R. Walton (1980), “Contextual Inference on Consumer Price Response: An Experimental Analysis,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.17, pp.349-358. 6.Biswas, A. and E. A. Blair (1991), “Contextual Effects of Reference Prices in Retail Advertisements,” Journal of Marketing, Vol.55, pp.1-12. 7.Blattberg, R. C. and S. A. Neslin (1990), “Sales Promotion: Concepts, Methods, and Strategies,” Englewood Chiffs, N.J. Prentice-Hall. 8.Brock, T. C. (1968), “Implications of Commodity Theory for Value Change,” in A. G. Greenwald, T. C. Brock, and T. M. Ostrom (Eds.), Psychological Foundations of Attitudes, pp.243-275, New York: Academic Press. 9.Chaiken, S., A. Liberman, and A. H. Eagly (1989), “Heuristic and Systematic Information Processing within and beyond the Persuasion Context,” in J. S. Uleman and J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended Thought, pp.212-252, New York: Guilford. 10.Chandon, P., B. Wansink, and G. Laurent (2000), “A Benefit Congruency Framework of Sales Promotion Effectiveness,” Journal of Marketing, Vol.64, pp.65-81. 11.Chen, K. (1996), “How’s This for a Cultural Revolution? -Chinese are Getting Home Shopping,” The wall street journal, Jan 4, 1996, pp.A6. 12.Davis, S., J. J. Inman, and L. McAlister (1992), “Promotion Has a Negative Effect on Brand Evaluations-Or Does It? Additional Disconfirming Evidence,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.29, pp.143-148. 13.Dhar, R. and S. M. Nowlis (1999), “The Effect of Time Pressure on Consumer Choice Deferral,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.25, pp.369-384. 14.Dodds, W. B. and K. B. Monroe (1985), “The Effects of Brand and Price Information on Subjective Product Evaluations,” in E. C. Hirschman and M. B. Holbrool (Eds), Advances in Consumer Research, Vol.12, pp.85-90, UT: Association for Consumer Research. 15.Dommermuth, W. P. (1989), “Promotion:Analysis, Creativity and Strategy,” 2nd edition, Boston, Mass. PWS-Kent Publishing Company. 16.Engel, J. F., M. R. Warshaw, T. C. Kinnear, B. B. Reece (2000), “Promotional Strategy,” 9th edition, Pinnaflex Educational Resources INC, Cincinnati Ohio. 17.Eysenck, M. W. (1976), “Arousal, Learning, and Memory,” Psychological Bulletin, Vol.83, pp.389-404. 18.Gillett, P. L. (1970), “A Profile of Urban In-Home Shopper,” Journal of Marketing, Vol.34, pp.40-45. 19.Grewal, D., R. Krishnan, J. Baker, and N. Borin (1998), “The Effect of Store Name, Brand Name and Price Discounts on Consumers' Evaluations and Purchase Intentions,” Journal of Retailing, Vol.74, pp.331-352. 20.Kotler, P. (1994), “Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning Implementing and Control,” 8th edition, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall. 21.Kotler, P. (2000), “Marketing Management,” New Jersey, Prentice Hall. 22.Lynn, M. (1991), “Scarcity Effects on Value: A Quantitative Review of the Commodity Theory Literature,” Psychology and Marketing, Vol.8, pp.43-57. 23.McCarthy, J. E. and J. W. D. Perreault (1984), “Basic Marketing,” Homewood, Illinois: Richard D. Irwin. 24.Monroe, K. B. (1990), “Pricing: Making Profitable Decisions,” 2nd edition, McGraw-Hill Publishing Company. 25.Moore, D. J. and R. W. Olshavsky (1989), “Brand Choice and Deep Price Discounts,” Psychology and Marketing, Vol.6, pp.181-196. 26.Nord, W. R. and P. Peter (1980), “A Behavior Modification Perspective on Marketing,” Journal of Marketing, Vol.44, pp.36-47. 27.Nowlis, S. M. (1995), “The Effect of Time Pressure on the Choice between Brands that Differ in Quality, Price, and Product Features,” Marketing Letters, Vol.6, pp.287-296. 28.Paley, N. (1989), “The Manager's Guide to Competitive Marketing Strategies,” American Management Association. 29.Park, C. W., E. S. Iyer, and D. C. Smith (1989), “The Effects of Situational Factors on In-Store Grocery Shopping Behavior: The Role of Store Environment and Time Available for Shopping,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.15, pp.422-433. 30.Payne, J. W., J. R. Bettman, and E. J. Johnson (1988), “Adaptive Strategy Selection in Decision Making,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, Vol.14, pp.534-552. 31.Rothschild, M. L. and W. C. Gaidis (1981), “Behavioral Learning Theory: Its Relevance to Marketing and Promotions,” Journal of Marketing, Vol.45, pp.70-78. 32.Sherif, C. W. (1963), “Social Categorization as a Function of Latitude of Acceptance and Series Range,” Journal of Abnormal Psychology, Vol.67, pp.148-156. 33.Stephens, D. L., R. P. Hill, and K. Bergman (1996), “Enhancing the Consumer-Product Relationship: Lessons from the QVC Home Shopping Channel,” Journal of Business Research, Vol.37, pp.193-200. 34.Suri, R. and K. B. Monroe (2003), “The Effects of Time Constraints on Consumers’ Judgments of Prices and Products,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.30, pp.92-104. 35.Svenson, L., A. Edland, and P. Slovic (1990), “Choices and Judgments of Incompletely Described Decision Alternatives under Time Pressure,” Acta Psychological, Vol.75, pp.153-169. 36.Svenson, O. and A. Edland (1987), “Change of Preferences under Time Pressure: Choices and Judgments,” Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, Vol.28, pp.322-330. 37.Thaler, R. (1985), “Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice,” Marketing Science, Vol.4, pp.199-214. 38.Urbany, J. E., W. O. Bearden, and D. C. Weilbaker (1988), “The Effect of Plausible and Exaggerated Reference Prices on Consumer Perceptions and Price Search,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.15, pp.95-110. 39.Wright, P. (1974), “The Harassed Decision Maker: Time Pressures, Distractions, and the Use of Evidence,” Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.59, pp.555-561. 40.Zeithaml, V. A. (1988), “Consumer Perception of Price, Quality and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence,” Journal of Marketing, Vol.52, pp.2-22. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/24580 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 電視購物在近幾年於國內非常盛行,即使在景氣低迷時,仍然締造令人咋舌的銷售佳績。在電視購物頻道裡常見的促銷手法,包括限時銷售、限量銷售、免費贈品等,常被認為是引起消費者購買慾望的原因之一,然而尚無學術研究結果證實電視購物頻道這些促銷手法與觀眾購買意願之間的直接關係。
本研究即是探討電視購物頻道中常見的限時、限量、贈品等促銷手法,是否真的能提高觀眾的購買意願,並運用實驗設計的方法,以瞭解各個實驗操弄變項對購買意願的影響,以及認知商品價值的中介效果或其他效果。實驗操弄的自變數為限時壓力(大、小)、限量壓力(大、小)、贈品價值(低、高、異常高)等,共有12組電視購物節目影片。研究結果發現: 1、當觀眾的商品知覺價值一致時,限時壓力對購買意願有顯著的影響。 2、限量壓力對觀眾的商品知覺價值與購買意願均有顯著的影響,而且知覺價值為限量壓力與購買意願之中介變數。 3、限量策略比限時策略更能影響觀眾的商品知覺價值與購買意願。 4、限時壓力與贈品價值存在交互作用,直接或間接(透過商品知覺價值)地影響購買意願。當限時壓力大時,贈品價值與購買意願存在非線性關係,隨著贈品價值的增加,購買意願呈現先升後降的趨勢。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | In Taiwan, TV shopping has been very popular in recent years. Even during the depression, it still created unbelievably vast sales. The promotional strategies used by TV shopping channels, including time-limited promotion, quantity-limited promotion, and free premiums, are considered as some contributors to consumers’ purchase intention. However, the relation between those promotional strategies and consumers’ purchase intention has not been proved by any academic research.
This study is to probe into the influence of foregoing promotional strategies on consumers’ purchase intention. Experimental design is used and the perceived value of the product is especially analyzed for its intermediary or other effects. The manipulated independent variables are the pressure of time limited, the pressure of quantity limited, and the value of premiums. The results can be summarized as follows: 1. When consumers’ perceived value is the same as one another, the pressure of time limited will affect consumers’ purchase intention. 2. The pressure of quantity limited has influence on consumers’ perceived value and purchase intention. Moreover, perceived value intermediates the effect of quantity-limited promotion on purchase intention. 3. The quantity-limited promotional strategy is superior to the time-limited promotional strategy in affecting consumers’ perceived value and purchase intention. 4. There is an interaction effect between the pressure of time limited and the value of premiums, which influences consumers’ purchase intention directly and indirectly (through perceived value). When the pressure of time limited is high, the value of premiums has an inverted V-shaped relation with consumers’ purchase intention. In other words, consumers’ purchase intention will go up first and go down later with the value of premiums rising from low to extraordinarily high. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T05:31:51Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-94-R92741004-1.pdf: 1481376 bytes, checksum: 99cf378c9fef3c606e7c681cb827ec51 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2005 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 中文摘要
英文摘要 目錄 表次 圖次 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機與背景 1 第二節 研究目的 3 第三節 研究範圍 4 第二章 文獻探討 5 第一節 電視購物 5 第二節 時間壓力 10 第三節 贈品促銷 13 第四節 促銷活動與認知價值 17 第三章 研究方法 20 第一節 研究架構 20 第二節 研究設計 22 第三節 實驗變數之定義與衡量 27 第四節 實驗程序 29 第四章 資料分析 30 第一節 樣本回收狀況 30 第二節 信度分析 32 第三節 操弄檢驗 33 第四節 假說檢定 36 第五章 結論與建議 47 第一節 研究結論 47 第二節 行銷理論意涵 49 第三節 行銷實務意涵 51 第四節 研究限制 53 第五節 後續研究建議 54 參考文獻 55 一、中文部分 55 二、英文部分 57 附錄 60 一、前測一問卷 60 二、前測二問卷 61 三、前測三問卷 62 四、正式實驗問卷 63 五、實驗影片之分鏡圖及說明 65 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 電視購物頻道促銷策略對購買意願之影響 | zh_TW |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 93-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.coadvisor | 陳文華 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 邱志聖,黃恆獎 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 電視購物頻道,限時,限量,贈品價值, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | TV shopping channel,time-limited,quantity-limited,the value of premiums, | en |
dc.relation.page | 67 | |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2005-06-27 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 商學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 商學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-94-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.45 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。