Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 管理學院
  3. 商學研究所
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/24364
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor簡怡雯(Yi-Wen Chien)
dc.contributor.authorYen-Ling Changen
dc.contributor.author張雁玲zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-08T05:23:20Z-
dc.date.copyright2011-08-02
dc.date.issued2011
dc.date.submitted2011-07-29
dc.identifier.citationAbelson, R. P. (1988), “Conviction,” American Psychologist, 43, 267-275.
Akshay R. Rao, Wanda A. Sieben (1992), “The Effect of Prior Knowledge on Price Acceptability and the Type of Infprmation,” Journal of Consumer Research, 19 (2), 256–270.
Bassili, J. N. (1996), “Meta-Judgmental versus Operative Indexes of Psychological Attributes: The Case of Measures of Attitude Strength,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 637-653.
Berger, Ida E. and Andrew A. Mitchell (1989), “The Effect of Advertising on Attitude Accessibility, Attitude Confidence, and the Attitude–Behavior Relationship,” Journal of Consumer Research, 16 (3), 269–279.
Bettman, J. R. and Park, C. W. (1980), “Effects of Prior Knowledge and Experience and Phase of the Choice Process on Consumer Decision Processes,” Journal of Consumer Research, 7, 234-248.
Bizer, G. Y., Tormala, Z. L., Rucker, D. D., and Petty, R. E. (2006), “Memory-Based versus On-line Processing: Implications for Attitude Strength,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 646-653.
Brucks and Merrie (1985), “The Effects of Product Class Knowledge on Information Search Behavior,” Journal of Consumer Research, 12(June), 1-16.
Cacioppo, J. T. and Petty, R. E. (1982), “The Need for Cognition,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116-131.
Costermans, J., Lories, G., and Ansay, C. (1992) , “ Confidence Level and Feeling of Knowing in Question Answering: The Weight of Inferential Processes,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 142-150.
Fazio, R. H. and Zanna, M. P. (1978), “Attitudinal Qualities Relating to the Strength of the Attitude–Behavior Relationship,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 398−408.
Glenberg, A. M., Wilkinson, A. C., and Epstein, W. (1982), “The Illusion of knowing: Failure in the Self-Assessment of Comprehension,” Memory and Conition, 10, 597-602.
Gross, S., Holtz, R., and Miller, N. (1995), “Attitude Certainty,” In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), “Attitude Strength: Antecedents and Consequences,” Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., 215-245
Johnson BT. (1994), “Effects of Outcome-Relevant Involvement and Prior Information on Persuasion,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 556–579.
Johnson, E. and Russo, J. (1984), “Product Familiarity and Learning New Information,” Journal of Consumer Research, 11, 542-550.
Koriat, A. (1993), “How Do We Know that We Know? The Accessibility Model of the Feeling of Knowing,” Psychological Review, 100, 609-639.
Martin, L. L. (1986), “Set/Reset: Use and Disuse of Concepts in Impression Formation,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 493-504.
Martin, Leonard L., Seta, John J., and Crelia, Rick A. (1990), “Assimilation and Contrast as a Function of People’s Willingness and Ability to Expend Effort in Forming an Impression,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 27-37.
Metcalfe, J. (1986), “Feeling of Knowing in Memory and Problem Solving,” Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12, 288-294.
Park, C. Whan, Meryl P. Gardner, and Vinod K. Thukral (1988), “Self-perceived Knowledge: Some Effects on Information Processing for a Choice Task, ” American Journal of Psychology, 101 (Fall), 401-424.
——— and V. Parker Lessig. (1981), “Familiarity and Its Impact on Consumer Decision Biases and Heuristics,” Journal of Consumer Research, 8 (September), 223-230.
Petrocelli, J. V., Tormala, Z. L., and Rucker, D. D. (2007), “Unpacking Attitude Certainty: Attitude Clarity and Attitude Correctness,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 30-41
Petty, R. E., Harkins, S. G., and Williams, K. D. (1980), “The Effects of Group Diffusion of Cognitive Effort on Attitudes: An Information Processing View,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 8-92.
———, Haugtvedt, C. P. and Smith, S. M. (1995), “Elaboration as a Determinant of Attitude Strength: Creating Attitudes that are Persistent, Resistant, and Predictive of Behavior,” In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude Strength: Antecedents and Consequences. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 93–130.
——— and Krosnick, J. A. (Eds.). (1995), “Attitude strength: Antecedents and Consequences,” Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
———, Priester JR, and Wegener DT. (1994), “Cognitive Processes in Attitude Change. In Handbook of Social Cognition,” ed . RS Wyer, TK Srull, 2:69–142. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. 2nd ed.
———, Wegener, Duane T., and Fabrigar, Leandre R. (1997) , “Attitudes and attitude change,” Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 609-647.
———, Wells, G. L., and Brock, T. C. (1976), “Distraction Can Enhance or Reduce Yielding to Propaganda: Thought Disruption versus Effort Justification,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 874-884.
Radecki, C. M. and Jaccard, J. (1995), “Perceptions of Knowledge, Actual Knowledge, and Information Search Behavior,” Journal of Experimental Psychology, 31, 107-138.
Raju, P. S. and Reilly, M. D. (1980), “Product Familiarity and Information Processing Strategies: An Exploratory Investigation,” Journal of Business Research, 8, 187-212.
Rao, A. R. and Monroe, K. B. (1988), “The Moderating Effect of Prior Knowledge on Cue Utilization in Product Evaluations,” Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 253-264.
Rucker, Derek D. and Richard E. Petty (2004), “When Resistance Is Futile: Consequences of Failed Counterarguing for Attitude Certainty,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(2), 219–235.
Schacter, D. L. (1983), “Feeling of Knowing in Episodic Memory,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 39-54.
Schwarz, Norbert, and Herbert Bless (1992), “Constructing Reality and Its Alternatives: An Inclusion/Exclusion Model of Assimilation and Contrast Effects in Social Judgment,” In Leonard L. Martin and Abraham Tesser (Eds.), The Construction of Social Judgments, (pp.217-245) Hillsdale, NY: Erlbaum.
Tormala, Z. L., Clarkson, J. J., and Petty, R. E. (2006), “Resisting Persuasion by the Skin of One's Teeth: The Hidden Success of Resisted Persuasive Messages,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 423−435
——— and Petty, R. E. (2002), “What Doesn't Kill Me Makes Me Stronger: The Effects of Resisting Persuasion on Attitude Certainty,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1298−1313.
Wu, C. and Shaffer, D. R. (1987), “Susceptibility to Persuasive Appeals as a Function of Source Credibility and Prior Experience with the Attitude Object,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 677-688.
Wegener Duane T. and Petty, Richard E. (1995),”Flexible Correction Processes in Social Judgment: The Role of Naive Theories in Corrections for Perceived Bias,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.68 (1), 36-51.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/24364-
dc.description.abstract消費者在評價一個產品時,不但會受到產品內在與外在的影響(包括產品本身內在的品質好壞,或是外在的廣告包裝),甚至於自己對於產品主�客觀知識程度的高低差別,都有可能影響對此產品態度的確定性。倘若在給予偏誤修正的提示下,讓消費者有動機與能力去察覺並辨別出任何影響對此產品態度的偏誤因子,消費者會為了要進行公正又客觀的態度評斷,將此受到偏誤因子影響的態度評分做反方向的調整,讓偏誤因子不要干擾且影響消費者對此產品的初始態度外;而產品態度確定性將有可能影響消費者對於偏誤因子的修正程度。
因此,本研究主要探討主�客觀知識程度的高低差別,是否對於產品態度的確定性會有所不同影響,以及在給予偏誤修正的提示之下,此態度確定性的不同,是否影響受測者察覺到不同多寡量的偏誤因子。為了驗證以上的推論,本研究採取有機洗髮精作為研究目標,分別以兩個不同的研究(主觀知識與客觀知識),進行2×2的實驗設計,分別操弄知識程度(高知識或低知識)、以及是否給予偏誤修正提示(有提示或沒提示),本研究結果為高主�客觀知識的受測者,對於主實驗產品(有機洗髮精)的態度確定性較高,因此即使在給予偏誤修正的提示後,會比低主�客觀知識的受測者察覺到較少的偏誤因子,進而進行較少的偏誤修正量。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractWhen consumers evaluate a product, they will not only be affected by the product factor, such as product quality, but also by the external factor, such as exterior packaging. In addition, one’s level of the subjective or objective product knowledge may influence the confidence of their attitude. If providing bias awareness and allowing consumers to have the motivation and the ability to identify the bias factors that affect their product attitude, consumers will adjust this attitude to commensurate bias factors toward an opposite direction of their initial attitude of the product so they can make a fair and objective attitude evaluation. Moreover, the level of the attitude confidence may also influence the consumers’ ability and motivation in detecting the bias.
Therefore, the current study is intending to find out whether the level of subjective / objective knowledge will influence the attitude confidence, and whether this different attitude confidence will in turn influence participants’ awareness of bias factors and thus conduct different amount of bias correction. To examine the above predicted relation, this study chooses “organic shampoo” as the study object for Study 1 (Subjective knowledge) and Study 2 (Objective knowledge), with a 2 ( high or low level of knowledge ) by 2 (given or not the tip of bias correction ) factorial design. The result shows that subjects with high level of subjective / objective product knowledge will have higher attitude confidence than subjects with low level of subjective / objective product knowledge. Furthermore, participants in high level of subjective/objective product knowledge also detect less bias factors and therefore less amount of bias correction when bias awareness is heightened.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T05:23:20Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-100-R98741052-1.pdf: 14959067 bytes, checksum: 9bf930df024bc462ac0137e9fc9fb7bf (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2011
en
dc.description.tableofcontents誌謝 II
中文摘要 III
Abstract IV
目錄 V
圖目錄 VII
表目錄 VIII
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機 1
第二節 研究目的 3
第三節 本研究特殊性 4
第二章 文獻探討 7
第一節 知識 7
第二節 態度確認性 10
第三節 修正模型 11
第三章 研究架構理論 15
第一節 研究架構 15
第二節 研究假設 16
第四章 研究方法 19
Study 1 主觀知識對態度確定性及偏誤修正量的影響 19
第一節 前測 19
第二節 主實驗 21
Study 2 客觀知識對態度確定性及偏誤修正量的影響 27
第一節 前測 27
第二節 主實驗 27
第五章 資料分析與研究結果 30
Study 1 主觀知識的實驗 30
第一節 操弄檢定 30
第二節 依變數檢定與假設驗證 33
Study 2 客觀知識的實驗 38
第一節 操弄檢定 38
第二節 依變數檢定與假設驗證 40
第六章 結論與建議 46
第一節 研究結果與結論 46
第二節 行銷上的意涵 47
第三節 研究限制 48
第四節 未來研究方向 49
參考文獻 50
附錄一 前測問卷 55
附錄二 主實驗問卷 60
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.subject偏誤修正行為zh_TW
dc.subject主觀知識zh_TW
dc.subject客觀知識zh_TW
dc.subject態度確定性zh_TW
dc.subject偏誤知覺zh_TW
dc.subjectsubjective knowledgeen
dc.subjectand the behavior of bias correctionen
dc.subjectbias perceiveden
dc.subjectattitude confidenceen
dc.subjectobjective knowledgeen
dc.title產品主客觀知識對消費者態度確定性與偏誤修正量之影響zh_TW
dc.titleThe influence of subjective and objective product knowledge on the attitude confidence and amount of correctionen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear99-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee蕭中強(Chung-Chiang Hsiao),練乃華(Nai-Hwa Lien),陳建維(Chien-Wei Chen)
dc.subject.keyword主觀知識,客觀知識,態度確定性,偏誤知覺,偏誤修正行為,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordsubjective knowledge,objective knowledge,attitude confidence,bias perceived,and the behavior of bias correction,en
dc.relation.page86
dc.rights.note未授權
dc.date.accepted2011-07-29
dc.contributor.author-college管理學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept商學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:商學研究所

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-100-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
14.61 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved