Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 醫學院
  3. 牙醫專業學院
  4. 臨床牙醫學研究所
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/24318
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor姚宗珍
dc.contributor.authorYuan-Hou Chenen
dc.contributor.author陳源厚zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-08T05:21:46Z-
dc.date.copyright2005-08-02
dc.date.issued2005
dc.date.submitted2005-07-26
dc.identifier.citationCarr AB. Beals DW. Larsen PE. Reverse-torque failure of screw-shaped implants in baboons after 6 months of healing. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1997;12(5):598-603.
Cheng SJ, Tseng IY, Lee JJ, Kok SH. A prospective study of the risk factors associated with failure of mini-implants used for orthodontic anchorage. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19(1):100-106.
Costa A, Raffini M, Melsen B. Miniscrews as orthodontic anchorage: a preliminary report. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1998; 13(3):201-9.
Deguchi T, Takano-Yamamoto T, Kanomi R, Hartsfield JK Jr, Roberts WE, Garetto LP. The use of small titanium screws for orthodontic anchorage. J Dent Res. 2003;82:377-381.
Gainsforth BL, Higley LB. A study of orthodontic anchorage possibilities in basal bone. Am J Orthod Oral Surg. 1945;31:406-16.
Gray JB, Steen ME, King GJ, Clark AE. Studies on the efficacy of implants as orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod. 1983 Apr;83(4):311-7.
Higuchi KW, Slack JM. The use of titanium fixtures for intraoral anchorage to facilitate orthodontic tooth movement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1991 Fall;6(3):338-44.
Huja SS, Litsky AS, Beck FM, Johnson KA, Larsen PE. Pull-out strength of monocortical screws placed in the maxillae and mandibles of dogs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. Mar 2005;127(3):307-13.
Johansson C. Albrektsson T. Integration of screw implants in the rabbit: a 1-year follow-up of removal torque of titanium implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1987;2(2):69-75.
Johansson P, Strid K-G. Assessment of bone quality from cutting resistance during implant surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994; 9:279-88.
Kanomi, R. Mini-implant for orthodontic anchorage. J Clin Orthod. 1997 Nov;31(11):763-7.
Kim SG. Implant-related damage to an adjacent tooth: a case report. Implant Dent 2000;9(3):278-80
Linder-Aronson S, Nordenram Å, Anneroth G. Titanium implant anchorage in orthodontic treatment: an experimental investigation in monkeys. Eur J Orthod. 1990;12:414-9.
Liou EJ, Pai BC, Lin JC. Do miniscrews remain stationary under orthodontic forces? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004; Jul; 126(1):42-7.
Lubberts R, Turley PR. Force application to bioglass coated alumina implants of various sizes. J Dent Res. 1982;61:339.
Majourau A. Norton LA. Uprighting impacted second molars with segmented springs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995; 107(3):235-8.
Marcaccin AM, Novaes AB Jr, Souza LS, Taba M Jr,Grisi FM. Immediate placement of implants into periodontally infected sites in dogs. Part 2: A fluorescence microscopy study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003 Nov-Dec;18(6):812-9.
Miyawaki S. Koyama I. Inoue M. Mishima K. Sugahara T. Takano-Yamamoto T. Factors associated with the stability of titanium screws placed in the posterior region for orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;124(4):373-8.
Niimi A. Ozeki K. Ueda M. Nakayama B. A comparative study of removal torque of endosseous implants in the fibula, iliac crest and scapula of cadavers: preliminary report. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1997;8(4):286-9.
Ohmae M, Saito S, Morohashi T, Seki K, Qu H, Kanomi R. A clinical and histological evaluation of titanium mini-implants as anchors for orthodontic intrusion in the beagle dog. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001;119:489-497.
Paige S, Clark AE, Costa P, King G, Waldron J. Orthodontic stress application to bioglass implants in rabbit femurs . J Dent Res. 1980; 59:445.
Park HS, Lee SK, Kwon OW. Group distal movement of teeth using miniscrew implant anchorage. Angle Orthod. 2005;75:510-517
Quinn RS, Yoshikawa DK. A reassessment of force magnitude in orthodontics. Am J Orthod. 1985 Sep;88(3):252-60.
Roberts WE, Smith RK, Silberman Y. Osseous adaptation to continuous loading of rigid endosseous implants. Am J Orthod. 1984;56:95-111.
Roberts WE, Helm FR, Marshall KJ, Gongloff RK. Rigid endosseous implants for orthodontic and orthopedic anchorage. Angle Orthod. 1989;59:247-56.

Saito S, Sugimoto N, Morohashi T, Ozeki M, Kurabayashi H, Shimizu H, Yamasaki K, Shiba A, Yamada S, Shibasaki Y. Endosseous titanium implants as anchors for mesiodistal tooth movement in the beagle dog. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000 Dec;118(6):601-7.
Sherman AJ. Bone reaction to orthodontic forces on carbon dental implants. Am J Orthod. 1978;74:79-87.
Simon H. Caputo AA. Removal torque of immediately loaded transitional endosseous implants in human subjects. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002;17(6):839-45.
Smally WM, Shapiro PA, Hohl TH, Kokich VG, Branemark PI. Osseintegrated titanium implants for maxillofacial protraction in momkeys. Am J Orthod. 1988;94: 285-95.
Smith JR. Bone dynamics associated with the controlled loading of bioglass-coated aluminum oxide endosteal implants. Am J Orthod. 1979; 76:618-66.
Smith DC. Dental implants: materials and design considerations. Int J Prosthod. 1993;6(2):106-17.
Soballe K. Hydroxyapatite ceramic coating for bone implant fixation. Mechanical and histological studies in dogs. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 1993;255:1-58.
Strid KG. Radiographic results. In: Brånemark P-I, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T (eds). Tissue-Integrated Prostheses: Osseointegration in Clinical Dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence. 1985;187-198.
Sullivan DY. Sherwood RL. Collins TA. Krogh PH. The reverse-torque test: a clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1996;11(2): 179-85.
Tjellstrom A. Jacobsson M. Albrektsson T. Removal torque of osseointegrated craniofacial implants: a clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1988;3(4):287-9.
Tricio J, van Steenberghe D, Rosenberg D, Duchateau L. Implant stability related to insertion torque force and bone density: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 1995 Dec;74(6):608-12.
Truhlar RS. Orenstein IH. Morris HF. Ochi S. Distribution of bone quality in patients receiving endosseous dental implants. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1997;55(12 Suppl 5):38-45.
Turley PK, Kean C, Schur J, Stefanac J, Gray J, Hennes J, Loon PC. Orthodontic force application to titanium endosseous implants. Angle Orthod. 1988;58: 151-62.
Ueda M, Matsuki M, Jacobsson M, Tjellstrom A. Relationship between insertion torque and removal torque analyzed in fresh temporal bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1991 Winter;6(4):442-7.
Weinstein S, Haack DC, Morris LY, Snyder BB, Attaway HE. On an equilibrium theory of tooth position. Angle Orthod. 1963;33:1-26
Wehrbein H, Diedrich P. Endosseous titanium implants during and after orthodontic- an experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1993;4:76-82.
Wehrbein H, Glatzmaier J, Yildirim M. Orthodontic anchorage capacity of short titanium screw implants in the maxilla: An experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1997;8:131-41.
Wehrbein H, Merz BR, Diedrich P. Palatal bone support for orthodontic implant anchorage--a clinical and radiological study. Eur J Orthod. 1999 Feb;21(1):65-70.
You ZH, Bell WH, Schneiderman ED, Ashman RB. Biomechanical properties of small bone screws. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1994 Dec;52(12):1293-302.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/24318-
dc.description.abstract壹、中文摘要
隨著社會經濟發展及美觀要求增加,牙齒矯正之需求日增。在矯正治療中,控制牙齒的移動是成功矯正的決定因素。尋找良好的錨定,一直是矯正醫師最大的難題。近年來在矯正治療中,以迷你骨釘與迷你骨板提供矯正錨定作用,已受到相當的重視。而迷你骨釘植入齒槽骨後是否對鄰近牙根造成潛在性傷害,是我們關心的問題。
本研究第一部分計畫利用動物實驗模擬與臨床相似的狀況,設計實驗來探討迷你植體於手術時可能對牙根造成的影響。實驗中共計有84根迷你骨釘(直徑2.0公釐、長度11公釐)植入6隻實驗狗上下顎齒槽骨中,並每隔三星期實施骨頭標定。實驗一依不同時間點將迷你骨釘植入下顎齒槽骨,使骨釘接觸或不接觸牙根。實驗二則將迷你骨釘植入上顎牙齒PM3牙根間,使骨釘接觸或不接觸牙根,並於犬齒及牙齒PM4施予150g力量移動牙齒。收集迷你骨釘植入扭力、卸除扭力、每隔3星期臨床檢查、組織學變化資料並加以分析。
實驗結果顯示:(1)下顎比上顎迷你骨釘有較大植入扭力,接觸牙根比沒接觸牙根迷你骨釘有較大植入扭力。(2)卸除扭力在牙齒接觸情形、迷你骨釘動搖度及植體存留時間(3星期與24星期間)有統計學差異。(3)接觸牙根的迷你骨釘有較高的骨釘失敗率。(4)組織觀察:失敗的迷你骨釘周圍被厚薄不一軟組織包圍並有發炎反應。當發炎反應存在會造成附近牙根吸收。而在螢光顯微觀察下亦可發現被吸收牙根會有修復作用產生,如含細胞牙骨質產生硬組織沈積。
本研究第二部分為收集臨床使用骨釘矯正病患相關資料及卸除扭力,以探討可能影響卸除扭力的因素。在實驗中共有20位病患及35支迷你骨釘卸除扭力及骨釘相關資料被收集分析。實驗結果顯示,75%迷你骨釘卸除扭力數值大於0.5kgcm。此外,下顎骨釘卸除扭力比上顎數值高,且有統計學差異,而年齡、性別、骨釘長度、骨釘留置時間及施力等待時間與卸除扭力無明顯相關。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractAbstract
With more psychosocial and facial concerns, there is an increasing demand for orthodontic treatment to improve facial esthetics, speech, and chewing function. The success of orthodontic treatments relies on the precision of tooth movement with proper anchorage control. Recently, implant anchors such as miniscrews and miniplates have been used for absolute anchorage during orthodontic treatment. However, the potential problem of damaging the adjacent roots while mini-implants placement is a major concern. Therefore, we use animal experiments simulating orthodontic tooth movement to evaluate the risks of placing the miniscrews.
Eighty-four miniscrews were surgically placed in maxillary and mandibular alveolar bone at each side of 6 adult beagle dogs with metabolic bone labeling at three-week intervals. In experiment 1, the miniscrews were placed, retained for different time points and then removed in mandibular area with or without hitting the adjacent teeth. In experiment 2, a NiTi coil for orthodontic force (150g) was used to pull the maxillary fourth premolar (PM4) and the canine towards each other for 6 months after a miniscrew was placed in the furcation of PM3 with or without intentional root damaging. The insertion torque, clinical measurements every three weeks, the removal torque, and the histological findings were analyzed.
In the animal study, we demonstrated that (1) the values of insertion torque were significantly higher in the mandible than those in the maxilla. The miniscrews contacting with the roots showed a significantly higher insertion torque than those without contact. (2) For removal torque: there was a significant difference of the removal torque measurements for the following variables: the mobility of miniscrew, the state of root contact, and the duration of miniscrew in place (3 weeks vs. 24 weeks). (3) The miniscrews contacting with the root was at greater risks for failures. (4) From histological findings: the failed miniscrews were surrounded with more soft tissue with inflammation. When more inflammation was present, it seems that the adjacent roots experienced more surface resorption. However, some of the inflammation induced root resorption could be repaired with surface deposition of mineralized tissue, likely the cellular cementum, or being partially filled with alveolar bone, both labeled with fluorophore markers.
The other purpose of this study was to measure the removal torque of the immediately loaded miniscrews in orthodontic patients after clinical usage and to find the possible factors associated with this value. From twenty patients with malocclusions, 35 miniscrews were removed and the removal torque was measured with a torque gauge. Removal torque values were subjected to statistical analysis for possible association of different clinical characteristics. The removal-torque value of 75% miniscrews was above 0.5kgcm. These values were significantly higher in the mandible than those in the maxilla. However, we could not detect a significant association between the removal-torque value and the following variables: age, gender, screw length, healing time and time in function. For uprighting tipped molars using anchorage from miniscrew, excessive torque in the counterclockwise direction may loosen it. From our measurement, the miniscrews should be able to sustain an uprighting moment in order for a more precise tooth movement.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T05:21:46Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-94-P91422004-1.pdf: 3582580 bytes, checksum: 955c9c781348ed35e3722ea9447b83c8 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2005
en
dc.description.tableofcontents目錄
圖目錄 II
表目錄 IV
壹 中文摘要 1
貳 英文摘要 3
參 前言 5
肆 文獻回顧 9
伍 材料與方法 17
5.1 狗動物模型實驗 17
5.2 臨床卸除扭力實驗 26
陸 結果 28
6.1狗動物模型實驗 28
6.2臨床卸除扭力實驗 37
柒 討論 38
7.1狗動物模型實驗 38
7.2臨床卸除扭力實驗 47
捌 結論 51
玖 參考文獻 53
拾 附圖與附表 57
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.subject迷你骨板zh_TW
dc.subject植入扭力zh_TW
dc.subject卸除扭力zh_TW
dc.subject迷你骨釘zh_TW
dc.subjectremoval torqueen
dc.subjectinsertion torqueen
dc.subjectminiscrewen
dc.subjectminiplateen
dc.title評估矯正治療中運用迷你骨釘穩定性及危險性zh_TW
dc.titleEvaluation of Stability and Risks Using Miniscrews in Orthodonticsen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear93-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee郭生興,余建宏
dc.subject.keyword迷你骨釘,迷你骨板,植入扭力,卸除扭力,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordminiscrew,miniplate,insertion torque,removal torque,en
dc.relation.page89
dc.rights.note未授權
dc.date.accepted2005-07-26
dc.contributor.author-college醫學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept臨床牙醫學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:臨床牙醫學研究所

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-94-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
3.5 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved