請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/24272
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 李吉仁 | |
dc.contributor.author | SHIHCHIEH CHO | en |
dc.contributor.author | 卓世傑 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T05:20:22Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2005-08-04 | |
dc.date.issued | 2005 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2005-07-28 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 一、中文部分
王平原譯(1996),十倍速時代(原著:A. Grove,1996, Only the paranoid survive),台北:大塊文化。 余佑蘭譯(2002),建構智慧型組織(原著:Pentti Sydanmaanlakka, 2002, An Intelligent Organization),台北:中國生產力中心。 余雅文(2003),企業動態能力之探究與衡量,國立嘉義大學管理研究所未出版之碩士論文。 吳皇榮(2003),運用「環境、策略、組織」觀點探討電信業者之經營邏輯-以中華電信公司與台灣電信集團為例,國立成功大學電信管理研究所未出版之碩士論文。 李再長譯(2004),組織理論與管理(原著:Richard L. Daft, 2001, Organization Theory and Design),台北:華泰文化事業(股)公司。 李吉仁(2003a),能耐基礎成長策略,台大EMBA課程講義。 李吉仁(2003b),國際企業組織(I):從結構到程序,台大EMBA課程講義。 李吉仁(2003c),專業效益、價值整合與企業策略,台大EMBA課程講義。 李吉仁(2003d),資源佈局與競爭優勢,台大EMBA講義。 李芳齡、李田樹譯(2004),創新者的解答(原著:Clayton M. Christensen & Michael E. Raynor, 2003, The Innovator’s Solution),台北:天下文化。 李芳齡譯(2002),小國競爭者的策略轉折點(原著:Dan Steinbock, 2001, The Nokia Revolution: The Story of an Extraordinary Company that Transformed an Industry),台北:商智文化。 李倉頡(2002),跨國企業之事業部撤離模式-以某電子公司為例,私立義守大學管理科學研究所未出版之碩士論文。。 李國瑜(2001),知識移轉的整合模式-知識特性、吸收能力與社會資本,國立政治大學企業管理研究所未出版之博士論文。 李啟誠(2003),國際合資事業控制機制之研究-以組織學習觀點,國立成功大學企業管理研究所未出版之博士論文。 李筠譯(2001),脈動速度下的決策者(原著:Charles Fine, 1999, Clockspeed:Winning industry control in the age of temporary advantage),台北:大塊文化。 汪維揚(2001),以系統動力學探討自組織團隊的認知機制,國立中山大學資訊管理學系未出版之博士論文。 林文寶(2001),技術知識整合、知識能量與組織學習對核心競爭力及創新績效關聯性之研究,國立成功大學企業管理研究所未出版之博士論文。 林金榜譯(2003),策略巡禮(原著:Henry Mintzberg, Bruce Ahlstrand, & Joseph Lampel, 1998, Strategy Safari–A Guide Tour Through the Wilds of Strategic Management),台北:城邦文化。 林晉寬(1995 ),從資源基礎理論探討資源特性與成長策略之關係,國立政治大學企業管理研究所未出版之博士論文。 邱議德(2003),以社會網路分析法評估工作團隊知識創造與分享,國立中正大學資訊管理研究所未出版之碩士論文。 洪啟淵(2003),廠商能耐基礎策略與持續性競爭優勢之個案研究,國立台灣大學國際企業研究所未出版之碩士論文。 孫麗珠、陳樹衡譯(2000),邊緣競爭(原著:Shona L. Brown & Kathleen M. Eisenhardt, 2000, Competing On The Edge – Strategy As Structured Chaos),台北:城邦文化。 涂敏芬(2002),以混沌觀點探討產業與技術改變,國立清華大學科技管理研究所未出版之碩士論文。 張旭男(2002),應用動態能力架構探討企業發展途徑,私立東海大學企業管理研究所未出版之碩士論文。 張志堅(2001),動態能耐管理與競爭互動之研究,國立嘉義大學管理研究所未出版之碩士論文。。 許安慶(2002),以複雜性科學論分析智慧卡產業的發展及策略模式:以建置墾丁e卡為例,中山大學企業管理所未出版之碩士論文。 許家銘(2001),組織變革關鍵環路之研究:北、高戶政革新歷程為例,中山大學企業管理所未出版之碩士論文。 許起裕(1996),策略演化與產業生態變遷之理論探討,國立台灣大學國際貿易學系未出版之碩士論文。 許嘉文(2001),國際化資源連結特性、能力提昇與廠商產業網路地位之關係研究,國立暨南大學國際企業研究所未出版之碩士論文。 陳朝福(2003),組織轉型研究-新科學典範的創造性演化觀點,國立台灣大學商學研究所未出版之博士論文。 傅冶天、林修葳、李亦秦譯(2002),經營策略與企業宏景(原著:Pankaj Ghemawat, 1998, Strategy and The Business Landscape),台北:華泰文化事業(股)公司。 湯明哲(2003),策略精論-基礎篇,台北:天下文化。 馮蘭絜(2001),以網路外部性和混沌理論看VISA之成長與運作,國立政治大學企業管理研究所未出版之碩士論文。 楊仁壽、俞慧芸、許碧芬譯(2003),組織理論與管理(原著:Gareth R. Jones, 2001, Organization Theory Text and Cases),台北:雙葉書廊公司。 盧正壽(2002),企業動態能力與產業環境動態程度之適配性研究,國立嘉義大學管理研究所未出版之碩士論文。。 賴義龍(2001),組織動態能耐演化之研究,國立政治大學經營管理碩士學程未出版之碩士論文。 薛迪安譯(1999),以人為本的企業:企業再造的關鍵因素(原著:Ghoshal, S., & Bartlette, C., The Individualized Corporation: a fundamentally new approach to management: great companies are defined by purpose, process, and people),台北:智庫股份有限公司。 謝凱宇(2000),生產基地外移與合作供應關係共同演化之研究,國立台灣大學國際企業學研究所未出版之碩士論文。 謝凱宇、林舒柔譯(2003),現代策略管理-觀念-技巧-應用(原著:Robert M. Grant, 2002, Contemporary Strategy Analysis),台北:科大文化事業(股)公司 羅世輝(1999),以系統動力學探討競爭性技術主流突現之動態過程,國立中山大學資訊管理學系未出版之博士論文。 蘇怡仲譯(2001),競爭加倍速:創新致勝(原著:James F. Moore,1997, The Death of Competition),台北:智庫股份有限公司。 二、英文部分 Ali-Yrkkö, J. (2001), Nokia’s Networking- Gaining Competitiveness from Co-operation, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy, B174 series, Taloustieto Ltd., Helsinki. Ali-Yrkkö, J. and Hermans, R. (2002), R., Nokia in the Finnish Innovation System. ETLA Discussion Paper no. 811,The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy. Anderson,P.,(1999),“Complexity Theory and Organization Science,” Organization Science, vol. 10, No. 3, pp.216-232. Arie Y. Lewin and Henk W. Volberda (1999), “Prolegomena On Coevolution: A Framework for Research on Strategy and New Organizational Forms”, Organization Science, Vol. 10, No. 5, pp519-534. Arie Y. Lewin, Chris P. Long, & Timothy N. Carroll (1999), “The Coevolution of New Organization Forms”, Organization Science, Vol. 10, No. 5, pp535-550. Brown, S. L. and K. M. Eisenhardt (1998), Competing On The Edge: Strategy As Structured Chaos, Cambidge, MA: Harvard Business School Press. Cazurra, Alvaro Cuervo (1999),Resource Development through the Co-evolution of Resources and Scope, Dissertation, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Chakravarthy, B. and White, R. (2002),Strategy Process: Forming, Implementing, and Changing Strategies, A. Pettigrew, H. Thomas, & R. Whittington (Eds.), Handbook of strategy and management (pp. 182-205). London: Sage. Chi, Jeffrey C. (2001), The Knowledge evolution framework: a Knowledge management perspective on the impact of knowledge segregation on product development projects, Dissertation, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Constance, Scott C. and Gower, Jeffrey R. (2001), A Value Chain perspective on the Economic Drivers of Competition in the Wireless Telecommunications Industry, Thesis, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Doornik , K & John Ronerts (2001), Nokia Corporation Innovation and Efficiency in a High-Growth Global Firm, S-IB-23, Stanford, CA: Stanford University. Dyer, Jane L.(2000), Innovation and Privatization in the telecommunications Industry, Thesis, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Gawer, Annabelle (2000),The Organization of Platform Leadership: An Empirical Investigation of Intel’s Management Processes Aimed at Fostering Complementary Innovation by Third Parties, Dissertation, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Gittell, Jody Hofrer (1995), Crossfunctional Coordination and Control – Influencing Employee Behavior and Process Outcomes through Organization Design in the Airline Industry, Dissertation, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Greenway, Joy M. (2000), Building Capacity for Innovation as a Source of Individual and Organizational Fulfillment, Thesis, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Gulati, R. and H. Singh(1998), “The architecture of cooperation:Managing coordination costs and appropriation concerns in strategic alliances,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 43, pp.781-814. Gupta, Anil K. and Westney, D. Eleanor (2003), Smart Globalization, SFO: Jossey-Bass. Hambrick, Donald C., David A. Nadler, and Michael L. Tushman (2001), Navigating Change, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. Hamel, G. (1991), “Competition for Competence and Inter-partner Learning within International Strategic Alliances”, Strategic Management Journal, 12, Summer Special Issue: 83-103 Hamel, G. and C. K. Prahalad (1989), Strategic Intent, Harvard Business Review, May-June, 63-76. Jarvenpaa, Sirkka (1995),Nokia Telecommunication: Redesign International Logistics, 9-996-006, Harvard Business School Cases. Levien, Roy and Marco Iansiti (2004), “Strategy as Ecology”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 82, No. 3, March: 68-78. Maanen, John Van (2003), ”Summary of the Three Lenses”, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Mitchell P. Koza and Arie Y. Lewin (1999), “The Coevolution of Network Alliances: A Longitudinal Analysis of an International Professional Service Network:, Organization Science, Vol. 10, No. 5, pp638-653. Munsinger, David B. (2002), The Evolution of the Wireless Equipment Value Chain, Thesis, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Nonaka, I. and H. Takeuchi (1995), The Knowledge-Creating Company, New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Prahalad, C. K. and G. Hamel (1990), The core competence and the corporation, Harvard Business Review, 68: 79-91. Regner, Patrick (2004), Adaptive and Creative Strategy Logics in Strategy Processes, Institute of International Business, Stockholm School of Economics. Sastry, M. Anjali (1995), Time and tide in organizations Simulating change processes in adaptive, punctuated, and ecological theories of organizational evolution, Dissertation, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Slack, Nigel and Michael Lewis (2002), Operation Strategy, London, UK: Pearson Education Ltd. Sobrero, Maurizio(1996), Inter-organizational Architecture and Innovation Processes, Dissertation, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Solvell, Orjan & Michael E. Portor(2004), Finland and Nokia, 9-702-427, Harvard Business School Publishing. Steinbock, Dan (2003), Wireless Horizon, New York, NY: American Management Association. Tanabe, Eiichi (2000), Knowledge Chain in the Clockspeed-based Organization, Thesis, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Un, C. Annique (2000), Organizational Capabilities, Knowledge, and Innovation: Strategies for Developing the Capability to Mobilize and Create Knowledge for Innovation, Dissertation, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/24272 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 目前的策略理論中,大多皆以特定、單一的觀點來詮釋企業成長、組織本質與環境變遷三者之間的互動關係,這對於解析變動與多元現象,可能產生侷限性而陷入思考盲點。因此,如何建立一種更多元與全觀性的策略思維,以因應充滿不確定性與呈現出規律與變動交織而成的複雜經營環境,成為策略研究的挑戰。為回應此一研究議題,本研究擬以企業動態能耐為基礎,採取共同演化之觀點,來探討企業成長與產業生態環境之間的互動架構與相關策略內涵,試圖針對企業整合成長模式、組織基架、與企業變革基模,提出觀念架構,最後,本研究將透過一個複雜企業的個案,以系統化地檢視前述所發展的觀念架構。
任何企業對其他企業的影響必定會回饋造成自身的改變,從而形成一個具備多向性與循環性的因果關係,各變數之間會有複雜的交互影響。宏觀演化層次的整合模式對企業而言,有效的策略不僅是在尋求延伸應用企業現有的能耐於既有的市場中,更要藉由創(更)新能耐來強化其生態系統(商業系絡)以及創造更多新市場契機,而最重要的關鍵是在企業的(網絡)關係能耐建構、延伸與更新。在微觀演化中,企業的策略、策略系絡與組織系絡決定共同演化關鍵元件活動的內涵,也從而決定在共同演化觀點下企業核心能耐與持續性競爭優勢的來源與因果互動關係。 立體網絡基架在實務上可用以協助執行組織策略,達成組織目標所決定之組織內部的水平分工方法、垂直分權程度、「課責、職權、職責」三位一體之指揮系統的安排、人力與資源的配置、垂直與水平溝通網絡的建立;也具體化以策略定位及競爭優勢建構需求為基礎的組織平衡設計之決策程度取捨:分權化vs.集權化、差異化vs.整合度、標準化vs.彈性調整、正式化vs.非正式化,更同時兼顧策略、政治、文化等三種不同觀點的組織內涵,因此,符合動態平衡的組織基架之意涵,故立體網絡基架可與組織目的、管理系統與組織文化發揮綜效,而建立協同並進與持舊創新的組織能耐,並在間斷均衡混沌中,進行動態調適與革新的平衡。 真正的企業變革必須是基於既有核心能耐的延伸與新核心能耐的創造之循環演化,而核心能耐的延伸與創新是在動態、開放和間斷均衡狀態下,透過混沌邊緣中的複雜自我組織過程產生的,既非純然理性調適,亦非純然環境決定,而是理性調適和環境決定在複雜自我組織過程中相互調和的共同出像。企業變革的重點應是在動態導向之共同演化能耐(內部的組織能耐與外部的關係能耐)系絡管理,而非靜態導向的組織結構安排。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Most of current strategy theories interpret the interplay among environmental changes, corporate growth strategy, organization structure tend to take rather narrow focus and perspective, which fails to capture the dynamics underlying strategy. The present research therefore suggests we take a co-evolution framework and competence-based view to examine the interplays between corporate growth and industry ecology. Upon a thorough review of relevant literatures and case study, this research attempts to furnish a comprehensive framework to depict three research issues; they are integrated model of corporate growth, dynamic balance of organizational architecture, and schema of corporate transformation.
The integrative model of macro-evolutionary level implies that an effective strategy not only looks for exploitation opportunities of existing competencies, but also explores new competencies to reinforce its industry ecology and create new growth options. In addition, the integrative model of micro-evolutionary level implies that company strategy, strategic context, and organizational context decide the key co-evolutionary elements and activities in common, as well as determine the sources and causal relationship of core competencies and sustainable competitive advantages. The three-layered network architecture implements the organizational strategy and accomplishes the organizational goals which encompass the horizontal collaboration, vertical empowerment, command system in terms of consistency between accountability, authority, and responsibility, allocation of human power and resources, establishment of horizontal and vertical communication network. It also come up with the decision trade-off of organizational balance design, including de-centralization vs. centralization, differentiation vs. integration, standardization vs. flexible adjustment, formalization vs. Informal system. The three-layered network architecture is fully in accord with the definition of dynamic balance of organization architecture and will generate synergies together with organizational purpose, management system, and organizational culture to construct the cooperative, exploited, and explored organizational competencies under the chaos and punctuated equilibrium. The genuine corporate transformation must exist in cyclic evolution based upon the exploitation of existing core competencies and exploration of new core competencies. The leveraging and innovation of core competencies will come out in the course of complex, self-organized and under the dynamic, open, punctuated equilibrium environment. At last, the critical issue of corporate transformation lies not so much on static organizational structure arrangement as in contextual management of dynamic co-evolutionary competencies. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T05:20:22Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-94-P91746015-1.pdf: 2016617 bytes, checksum: dff1ed3e7f20d2aef414aa119666c8f6 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2005 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 謝詞………………………………………………………………… I
中文摘要…………………………………………………………… II 英文摘要…………………………………………………………… III 目錄………………………………………………………………… IV 表次………………………………………………………………… VI 圖次………………………………………………………………… VII 第一章 緒論 第一節 研究動機………………………………………………… 1 第二節 研究問題………………………………………………… 3 第三節 研究目的………………………………………………… 5 第四節 研究流程與方法………………………………………… 6 第二章 文獻探討 第一節 策略變革與策略動態性………………………………… 8 第二節 資源基礎理論…………………………………………… 12 第三節 能耐基礎成長理論……………………………………… 14 第四節 動態能力理論…………………………………………… 20 第五節 關係能力與社會資本理論……………………………… 22 第六節 企業生態系統與定位策略……………………………… 26 第七節 組織設計、組織能耐與組織變革……………………… 30 第八節 演化與共同演化………………………………………… 37 第三章 Nokia個案簡介與評論 第一節 Nokia 之發展沿革……………………………………… 46 第二節 全球電信產業演化與變遷……………………………… 49 第三節 芬蘭國家創新系統與Nokia…………………………… 54 第四節 Nokia整體營運及發展概述…………………………… 55 第五節 Nokia企業成長、企業變革與組織演化之綜合評論… 74 第四章 企業變革、組織基架與企業成長之共同演化模型 第一節 企業變革之共同演化基模…………………………… 79 第二節 動態平衡之組織基架………………………………… 88 第三節 企業動態能耐與成長之共同演化整合模式………… 101 第五章 結論與建議 第一節 研究結論……………………………………………… 121 第二節 實務上建議…………………………………………… 124 第三節 後續研究建議………………………………………… 125 參考文獻 127 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 企業動態能耐與成長之共同演化模型研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | A Conceptual Exploration on the Co-evolution between
Dynamic Capabilities and Corporate Growth | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 93-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 黃崇興,陳振祥 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 共同演化,動態能耐,企業變革,組織基架, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Co-evolution,Dynamic Capabilities,Corporate Transformation,Organizational Architecture, | en |
dc.relation.page | 132 | |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2005-07-28 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 國際企業管理組 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 國際企業管理組 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-94-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.97 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。