請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/24043
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 陳思寬 | |
dc.contributor.author | Hao-Yuan Lin | en |
dc.contributor.author | 林皓源 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T05:14:43Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2006-07-03 | |
dc.date.issued | 2006 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2006-06-28 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 一、 中文部分
1. 賴景昌(1993),《國際金融理論:基礎篇》,台北:茂昌。 2. 李榮謙(1997),《國際貨幣與金融》,台北:智勝文化。 3. 江丙坤(1998),「日本總體經濟及財經改革之探討」,《自由中國之工業》, 88:5。 4. 葉明峰、許福添(1999),「日本最新振興經濟成效」,《台灣經濟金融月刊》,35:5,第41-50頁。 5. 高超陽、盧世勳(2000),「日本經濟危機及因應對策」,《國際金融參考資料》第45輯,191-216。 6. 李恩慈(2001),貨幣市場需求彈性因子分析-以日本經濟為例,國立中山大學經濟學研究所碩士論文。 7. 黃台心(2002),「出口與經濟成長的因果關係:台灣的實證研究」,《經濟論文叢刊》,30:4,第465-490頁。 8. 林明旻(2004),實質匯率變動對產出之影響-以台灣與南韓為例,國立成功大學政治經濟研究所碩士論文。 9. 楊奕農(2005),《時間序列分析-經濟與財務上之應用》,台北:雙葉書廊。 二、 英文部分 1. Agenor, P. (1991), “Output, Devaluations and the Real Exchange Rate in Developing Countries,” Weltwirtschaftliches Archive, No. 127, 18-41. 2. Agenor, P., and P. J. Montiel (1996), Development Macroeconomics (Princeton: Princeton University Press). 3. Alexius, A. (2005), “Productivity shocks and real exchange rates,” Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 52, 555-566. 4. Bahmani-Oskooee, M. (1985), “Devaluation and The J-Curve: Some Evidence from LDCs,” The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 67, 500-504. 5. Bahmani-Oskooee, M., and H.J. Rhee (1997), “Response of Domestic Production to Depreciation in Korea: An Application of Johansen’s Cointegration Methodology,” International Economic Journal, Vol. 11, 103-112. 6. Bahmani-Oskooee, M, and S. Chomsisengphet, M. Kandil (2002), “Are devaluations contractionary in Asia?” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Vol. 25, No. 1, 70-79. 7. Bank of Japan (2005), ” Explanation of the Effective Exchange Rate (Nominal, Real)” 8. Caves, R. E., & J. A. Frankel, R. W. Jones (1999), World Trade and Payments: An Introduction (Boston, Mass: Addison-Wesley, 8th ed.). 9. Diaz-Alejandro, F. C. (1963), “A Note on the Impact of Devaluation and the Redistributive Effect,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 71, 577-580. 10. Edwards, S. (1986), “Are Devaluations Contractionary?” The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 68, 501-508. 11. Findlay, R., and C. A. Rodriguez (1977), “Intermediate Imports and Macroeconomic Policy under Flexible Exchange Rates,” Canadian Journal of Economics, Vol. 10, 208-217. 12. Gavin, M. (1992), “Monetary Policy, Exchange Rate, and Investment in a Keynesian Economy,” Journal of International Money and Finance, Vol. 11, 145-161. 13. Gylfason, T., and M. Schmid (1983), “Does Devaluation Cause Stagflation?” Canadian Journal of Economics, Vol. 16, 641-654. 14. Gylfason, T., and O. Risager (1984), “Does Devaluation Improve Current Account?” European Economic Review, Vol. 25, 37-64. 15. Gylfason, T., and M. Radetzki (1985), “Does Devaluation Make Sense in the Least Developed Countries?” IIES Seminar Paper, No. 314 (University of Stockholm). 16. Krugman, P. R., and M. Obstfeld (2003), International Economics: Theory and policy (Boston, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 6th ed). 17. Kamin, S. B., and J. H. Rogers (2000), “Output and the Real Exchange rate in developing Countries: An application to Mexico,” Journal of Development Economics, Vol. 61, 85-109. 18. Kandil, M. (2000), “The Asymmetric Effects of Exchange Rate Fluctuations: Theory and Evidence from Developing Countries,” IMF working paper, No. 184. 19. Kandil, M., and A. Mirzaie (2002), “Exchange Rate Fluctuations and Disaggregated Economic activity in the US: Theory and Evidence,” Journal of International Money and Finance, No. 21, 1-31. 20. Krugman, P., and Taylor, L. (1978), “Contractionary effect of Devaluation,” Journal of International Economics, Vol. 8, 445-456. 21. Lizondo, J. S., and, P. J. Montiel (1989), “Contractionary Devaluation in Developing Countries,” IMF Staff Papers, Vol. 36, 182-277. 22. Mills, T. C., and E. J. Pentecost (2003), “Is there a relationship between real exchange rate movements and the output cycle?” Economic Modelling, Vol. 20, 593-603. 23. Monacelli, T. (2004), “Into the Mussa puzzle: monetary policy regimes and the real exchange rate in a small open economy,” Journal of International Economics, Vol. 62, 191-217 24. Moreno, R. (1999), “Depreciation and Recessions in East Asia,” FRBSF Economic Review, Vol. 3, 27-40. 25. Rajan, R. S., and T. Yang (2000), “Devaluation of the Baht and Economic Contraction in Thailand,” research paper (Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies). 26. Rautava, J. (2004), “The role of oil prices and the real exchange rate in Russia’s economy-a cointegration approach,” Journal of Comparative Economics, Vol. 32, 315-327 27. Upadnyaya, K. P., and D. Dhakal (1996), “Devaluation and the trade balance: estimating the long run effect,” Applied Economics Letters, Vol. 33, No. 4, 343-345. 28. Upadnyaya, K. P., and M. P. Upadnyaya (1999), “Output Effect of Devaluation: Evidence from Asia,” The Journal of Development Studies , Vol. 35, No.6, 89-103. 29. Wang, P., and P. Dunne (2003), “Real Exchange Rate Fluctuations in East Asia: Generalized Impulse-Response Analysis,” Asian Economic Journal, Vol. 17, No. 2,185-203. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/24043 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本文旨在研究台灣與日本的實質有效匯率變動對產出之影響。從過去文獻發現,本國貨幣貶值對於產出之影響效果並無一致性的答案。在1997年亞洲金融風暴時,很多東南亞國家之貨幣在劇烈貶值後,卻未能使得產出上升,這與傳統理論結果大異其趣,傳統國際貿易理論認為透過改變國內外財貨的相對價格,可刺激一國出口,進而使得產出增加。台灣為小型開放經濟體,而日本則為大型開放經濟體,而國際貿易對於兩國經濟皆相當重要,故本文欲研究實質有效匯率變動效果是否會因開放經濟體規模大小不同而有所差異。
本研究引用Agenor 之理論模型,輔以單根檢定、Johansen共整合檢定與向量誤差修正模型(VECM)等計量方法進行實證分析。研究兩國之時間範圍資料皆採用1980年第一季至2004年第四季之季資料。實證發現:短期內,新台幣及日圓之實質有效匯率貶值,皆對實質產出有擴張性效果。長期之下,實質有效匯率指數下跌(台幣貶值)將對台灣之實質產出有正面效果;但對日本則無顯著影響效果。從共整合分析中發現兩國之產出水準與貿易依存度之間存在一長期正向關係,顯示過去之國際貿易成長有助於經濟成長。 本國貨幣貶值效果猶如刀之兩刃,其成效決定於總合需求擴張效果與總合供給緊縮效果之相對大小,而台灣與日本之進出口貿易總值佔國內生產毛額相當大的比例,故兩國若以貨幣貶值作為刺激經濟之政策,則其成效可能將不如預期。相較於名目匯率,實質有效匯率更有助於一國匯率政策之制訂。對於台灣及日本而言,維持本國實質匯率的相對穩定,對於兩國產業在進行國際貿易時,將可減少不必要的匯率風險與成本波動,故匯率政策不應僅從單方面的價格競爭力思考,還需考慮對於國內經濟衝擊的長短期效果,以及與全球經貿環境的連動性。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | This thesis intends to investigate the impact of real effective exchange rate (REER) fluctuation on Taiwan and Japan’s real output (GDP). Discovered by existing literature and previous research, the depreciation effects of domestic currency on output are not consistent. Following Asia financial crisis during 1997, many currencies of Southeast Asia Countries dramatically depreciated. Nevertheless, their outputs had not been increased. The result contradicted with traditional theories, which is considered to be stimulating economic growth by changing relative prices of goods between home and foreign countries. Taiwan is a small open economy whereas Japan is large. Therefore, international trade is very important for their economic growth, hence to examine the extent of variation on REER under different open economy scales.
The empirical analysis was based on Agenor’s (1991) theoretical model and adopted econometrics methods including unit root test, Johansen cointegration test and VECM. Employing the time series data of both Taiwan and Japan was over the 1980I-2004IV period. From our empirical results: the depreciation of REER on Taiwanese NT dollar and Japanese Yen had expansion effect on output in the short-run. In the long-run, the depreciation of REER on Taiwan had expansion effect, but not significant on Japan Yen. By cointegration analysis, it discovered they had a long-run positive relationship between output and foreign trade dependence. Hence, it revealed increase in international trade benefited economic growth. The depreciation effect of the local currency is like two edges of a sword, it depends on the relative effects between the expansion on aggregate demand and the contraction on aggregate supply. Since the total amount of foreign trade in Taiwan and Japan accounts for sizable proportions of GDP, the effect may be lower than expectation if the governments desire to stimulate economic growth by depreciation. Compared with nominal exchange rate, REER contributes to one country's policy making even more. As to Taiwan and Japan, maintaining REER relative stability would reduce unnecessary exchange rate risk cost while the two counterparts proceed with trade. Consequently, the exchange rate policy is not only deliberated from price competitiveness, but is also considered as the time-span effects of impact on domestic economics, and the linkage between global economies. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T05:14:43Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-95-R93724062-1.pdf: 861738 bytes, checksum: 947e247f709acbc5e2e256e706c237d7 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2006 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機及目的 1 第二節 研究流程與架構 3 第三節 台日之匯率制度與貿易概況 6 第二章 理論探討與文獻回顧 15 第一節 匯率影響產出之理論文獻 15 第二節 匯率影響產出之實證文獻 20 第三節 貿易依存度影響產出之理論探討 25 第三章 研究方法 27 第一節 理論模型之推導 29 第二節 實證模型 33 第三節 相關統計檢定 34 第四章 實證研究 42 第一節 資料來源及變數定義 42 第二節 數列定態分析 45 第三節 共整合檢定 47 第四節 向量誤差修正模型 50 第五節 衝擊反應函數 56 第五章 結論 58 第一節 實證結論與說明 58 第二節 研究限制與後續研究建議 67 參考文獻 69 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 實質有效匯率變動對產出之衝擊反應
以台灣與日本為例 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Impact of Real Effective Exchange Rate Fluctuations on Outputs: A Comparative Analysis of Taiwan and Japan | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 94-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳昭南,萬哲鈺 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 實質有效匯率,貿易依存度,單根檢定,向量誤差修正模型,共整合分析,衝擊反應函數, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Real Effective Exchange Rate (REER),Unit Root test,VECM,Cointegration test,Impulse Response Function, | en |
dc.relation.page | 72 | |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2006-06-28 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 國際企業學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 國際企業學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-95-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 841.54 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。