請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/23923完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 黃達業 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Cheng-Ching Wu | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 吳正慶 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T05:12:34Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2006-07-29 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2006 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2006-07-18 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 參考文獻
Amel, Dean, Colleen Barnes, Fabio Panetta, and Carmelo Salleo, (2004). “Consolidation and Efficiency Financial Sector: A Review of International Evidence,” Journal of Banking and Finance 28, 2943-2519. Avery, Robert B., Raphael W. Bostic, Paul S. Calem, Glenn B. Canner, (1999). “Consolidation and Bank Branching Patterns,” Journal of Banking and Finance 23, 497-523. Avkiran, Necmi Kemal, (1999). “The Evidence on Efficiency gains: The Role of Mergers and the Benefits to the Public,” Journal of Banking and Finance 23, 991-1013. Berger, Allen N., Anthony Saunders, Joseph M. Scalise, and Gregory F. Udell, (1998). “The Effects of Bank Mergers and Acquisitions on Small Business Lending,” Journal of Financial Economics 50, 187-229. -----., Rebecca S. Demsetz, and Phillip E. Strahan, (1999). 'The Consolidation of the Financial Services Industry: Causes, Consequences, and Implications for the Future.'. Journal of Banking and Finance 23, 135-90. Boot, Arnoud W.A., (1999). “European Lessons on Consolidating Banking,” Journal of Banking and Finance 23, 609-13. Collender, Robert N. and Sherrill Shaffer, (2003). “Local bank office ownership, deposit control, market structure, and economic growth,” Journal of Banking and Finance 27, 27-57. Cyree, Ken B, James W. Wansley, and Thomas P. Boehm, (2000). “Determinants of Bank Growth Choice,” Journal of Banking and Finance 24, 709-34. Dutz, Mark A., (1989). “Horizontal Mergers in Declining Industries: Theory and Evidence,” International Journal of Industrial Organization 7, 11-33. Focarelli, Dario, Fabio Panetta, and Carmelo Salleo, (2002). “Why Do Banks Merge?” Journal of Banking and Finance 34, 1047-66. Hadlock, Charles, Joel Houston ,and Michael Ryngaert, (1999). “The Role of Managerial Incentives in Bank Acquisitions,” Journal of Banking and Finance 23, 221-49. Haynes, Michelle and Steve Thompson, (1999). “The Productivity Effects of Bank Mergers: Evidence from the UK Building Societies,” Journal of Banking and Finance 23, 825-46. Scott, Jonathan A. and William C. Dunkelberg, (2003). “Bank Mergers and Small Firm Financing,” Journal of Monev, Credit, and Bankinig 35, 999-1017. Milbourn, Todd T., Arnoud W.A. Boot and Anjan V. Thakor, (1999). “Megamergers and Expanded Scope: Theories of Bank Size and Activity Diversity,” Journal of Banking and Finance 23, 195-214. Rhoades, Stephen A., (1993). 'Efficiency Effects of Horizontal Bank Mergers.' Journal of Banking and Finance 17, 411-22. ____. (1994). 'A Summary of Merger Performance Studies in Banking, 1980-93, and an Assessment of the 'Operating Performance' and 'Event Study' Methodologies. ' Federal Reserve Board, Staff Study 167. Strahan, Philip E. and James P. Weston,(1998). “Small business lending and the changing structure of the banking industry,” Journal of Banking and Finance 22, 821-45. Thompson, Steve, (1997). “Takeover Activity among Financial Mutuals: An Analysis of Target Characteristics,” Journal of Banking and Finance 21, 37-53. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/23923 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 我國金融控股公司併購策略與成效之研究:
以台北銀行與富邦銀行併購案為例 摘要 本文首先蒐集並歸納銀行業從事購併活動的理論動機,其次整理學術界對於世界各國銀行併購案的實證研究結果,以了解其成效。最後以臺北銀行與富邦銀行合併案為例,觀察並分析二家績優公民營銀行的合併以前、過度期間以及合併後成效。重要結論如下:第一、依據合併前三年的六項指標平均數,臺北銀行與富邦銀行優劣互見,其合併案應屬二家優質廠商,基於互補的理由進行合併。第二、在業務整合的二年內,被併的臺北銀行逐漸喪失原有優勢,而原本即屬於收購主體的富邦銀行則成為合併的獲益者。第三、正式合併後,臺北富邦銀行與全體銀行的經營與財務比率數據絕大多數超越全體銀行的平均值,而整合期間一度嚴重衰退的主要業務成長率亦大幅上升,遠超過全體銀行的平均值。合併的成效已經逐漸浮現出來,惟效率的提升能夠持續多久,則尚有待持續觀察。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | The Study of Merge and Acquisition Strategy and Its Effectiveness of The Financial Holding Companies in Taiwan:
The Case of Taipei Bank and Fubon Bank Abstract The article firstly addresses the banks’ theoretical motivation of merge and acquisition activities based on the collected information. Secondly, it shows some of the academic researchers’ results of their studies on worldwide banks’ merge and acquisition activities in order to understand its effectiveness. Finally, the article uses the case of Taipei Bank and Fubon Bank’s merge and acquisition as an example to observe and analyze the effectiveness of the two banks before, during and after their integration. The important conclusions are drawn as follows: 1) Based on the average scores of the six key business indications for the last three years before the integration, the high and low scores of both banks indicate that Taipei Bank and Fubon Bank may potentially complement each other, therefore the merge and acquisition may benefit for both. 2) The acquired Taipei bank has suffered a gradual loss of some business advantages during the first two years of the integration. On contrary, the merger, Fubon bank, has gained business advantages from the merge and acquisition. 3) After the integration, Taipei Fubon Bank’s performing and financial ratios surpass the majority of the banks’. In addition, Taipei Fubon Bank’s main business growth rate that suffered a serious decrease during the period of integration has increased significantly, which is now far beyond the average growth rate of all banks. The effectiveness of merge and acquisition has started to show gradually, yet whether it will last for as long as we can expect is still questionable. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T05:12:34Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-95-P92745025-1.pdf: 446906 bytes, checksum: 2301ec9f3c456a9737ff56461e2259a5 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2006 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 目 錄 頁 數
謝 詞………………………………………………………… 三 中文摘要……………………………………………………… 四 英文摘要……………………………………………………… 五 目 錄………………………………………………………… 六 表目錄………………………………………………………… 八 第一章 緒論…………………………………………………… 1 第一節 金融控股的緣由……………………………………… 1 第二節 本文研究目的…………………………………………11 第三節 本文架構………………………………………………13 第二章 金融控股公司併購之意義、動機與實證研究結果…14 第一節 金融控股公司併購的意義……………………………14 第二節 金融控股公司併購的動機理論………………………21 第三節 銀行併購的實證研究結果……………………………28 第三章 臺北銀行與富邦銀行合併案分析……………………37 第一節 臺北銀行與富邦銀行合併案的經過與內容…………37 第二節 合併前臺北銀行與富邦銀行的績效比較……………44 第三節 合併後臺北銀行與富邦銀行的績效分析……………54 第四節 合併前後財務狀況綜合比較…………………………60 第四章 結論……………………………………………………66 參考文獻…………………………………………………………70 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 金控併購 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Acquisition | en |
| dc.subject | Merge | en |
| dc.title | 我國金融控股公司併購成效之研究:
以台北銀行與富邦銀行併購案為例 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Study of Merge and Acquisition Strategy and Its Effectiveness of The Financial Holding Companies in Taiwan:
The Case of Taipei Bank and Fubon Bank | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 94-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 劉順仁,劉啟偉 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 金控併購, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Merge,Acquisition, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 73 | |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2006-07-19 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 財務金融學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 財務金融學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-95-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 436.43 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
