請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/23793
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 戴政 | |
dc.contributor.author | Yu-Chieh Huang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 黃郁潔 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T05:10:11Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2011-10-03 | |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2011-07-15 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 戴政(2002) 遺傳流行病學-基因定位之遺傳設計與分析方法。藝軒,台北。
Abecasis GR, Cookson WO, and Cardon LR (2000) Pedigree tests of transmission disequilibrium. Eur J Hum Genet 8, 545-551. Abel L, Alcais A and Mallet A (1998) Comparison of four sib-pair linkage methods for analyzing sibships with more than two affecteds: interest of the binomial maximum likelihood approach. Genet Epidemiol 15, 371-390. Abrahamsen P (1997) A review of Gaussian random fields and correlation functions. Technical Report 917, Norwegian Computing Center. Agresti A (2002) Categorical data analysis. Wiley, New York, 2nd edition. Armitage P (1955) Tests for linear trends in proportions and frequencies. Biometrics 11, 375–386. Boehnke M and Langefeld CD (1998) Genetic association mapping based on discordant sib pairs, the discordant-alleles test. Am J Hum Genet 62, 950-961. Camp NJ (1997) Genomewide transmission/disequilibrium testing– Consideration of the genotypic relative risks at disease loci. Am J Hum Genet 61, 1424-1430. Casella G and Berger R (2002) Statistical inference. Duxbury, Pacific Grove, CA, 2nd edition. Chen WM, Manichaihul A, and Rich S (2009) A generalized family- based association test for dichotomous traits. Am J Hum Genet 85, 364-376. Chen YH, Lin HW (2008) Simple association analysis combining data from trios/sibships and unrelated controls. Genet Epidemiol 32, 520-527. Christakos G (1992) Random field models in earth sciences. Academic Press, San Diego. Cox DR and Hinkley DV (1974) Theoretical statistics. London: Chapman and Hall. Cramér H and Leadbetter MR (1967) Stationary and related stochastic processes. Wiley, New York. Curtis D (1997) Use of siblings as controls in case-control association studies. Ann Hum Genet 61, 319-333. Davies RB (1977) Hypothesis testing when a nuisance parameter is present only under the alternative. Biometrika 64, 247-254. Davies RB (1987) Hypothesis testing when a nuisance parameter is present only under the alternative. Biometrika 74, 33-43. Deng HW, Chen WM, and Recker RR (2002) Transmission disequilibrium test with discordant sib pairs when parents are available. Hum Genet 110, 451-461. Devlin B and Roeder K (1999) Genomic control for association studies. Biometrics 55, 997-1004. Devlin B, Roeder K, and Wasserman L (2001) Genomic control, a new approach to genetic-based association studies. Theor Popul Biol 60, 155-66. Efron B (1997) The length heuristic for a simultaneous hypothesis tests. Biometrika 84, 143-147. Epstein MP, Allen AS, and Satten GA (2007) A simple and improved correction for population stratification in case-control studies. Am J Hum Genet 80, 921-930. Falk CT and Rubinstein P (1987) Haplotype relative risks, an easy reliable way to construct a proper control sample for risk calculations. Ann Hum Genet 51, 227-233. Fleming TR and Harrington DP (1991) Counting Processes and Survival Analysis. New York: Wiley. Freidlin B, Zheng G, Li Z, and Gastwirth JL (2002) Trend tests for case-control studies of genetic markers: power, sample size and robustness. Hum Hered 53, 146-152. Gastwirth JL (1966) On robust procedures. J Am Statist Assoc 61, 929-948. Gastwirth JL (1985) The use of maximin efficiency robust-tests in combining contingency tables and survival analysis. J Am Statist Assoc 80, 380-384. González JR, Carrasco JL, Dudbridge F, Armengol L, Estivill X, and Moreno V (2008) Maximizing association statistics over genetic models. Genet Epidemiol 32, 246-254. Gross ST (1981) On asymptotic power and efficiency of tests of independence in contingency tables with ordered classifications. J Am Statist Assoc 76, 935-941. Guo CY, Lunetta KL, DeStefano AL, Ordovas JM, and Cupples LA (2007) Informative-transmission disequilibrium test (i-TDT): Combined linkage and association mapping that includes unaffected offspring as well as affected offspring. Genet Epidemiol 31, 115-133. Hothorn L and Hothorn T (2009) Order-restricted scores test for the evaluation of population-based casecontrol studies when the genetic model is unknown. Biometrical Journal 51, 659-669. Horvath S and Laird NM (1998) A discordant-sibship test for disequilibrium and linkage, no need for parental data. Am J Hum Genet 63, 1886-1897. Jaynes ET (1957) Information theory and statistical mechanics. Phys Rev 106, 620-630. Joo J, Kwak M, and Zheng G (2010) Improving power for testing genetic association in case-control studies by reducing alternative space. Biometrics 66, 266-276. Kimeldorf G, Sampson AR, Whitaker LR (1992) Min and max scorings for two-sample ordinal data. J Am Statist Assoc 87, 241-247. Kimmel G, Jordan MI, Halperin E, Shamir R, and Karp RM (2007) A randomization test for controlling population stratification in whole-genome association studies. Am J Hum Genet 81, 895-905. Knapp M (1999) The transmission/ disequilibrium test and parental- genotype reconstruction, the reconstruction-combined transmission/ disequilibrium test. Am J Hum Genet 64, 861-870. Kullback S (1959) Information Theory and Statistics. Wiley, New York. Kwak M, Joo J, and Zheng G (2009) A robust test for two stage design in genome-wide association studies. Biometrics 65, 1288-1295. Lachin JM (2000) Biostatistical methods: The assessment of relative risks. Wiley: New York. Laird NM, Blacker D, and Wilcox M (1998) The sib transmission/ disequilibrium test is a Mantel-Haenszel test. Am J Hum Genet 63, 1915. Lake S, Blacker D, and Laird N (2000) Family-based tests of association in the presence of linkage. Am J Hum Genet 67, 1515-1525. Lander ES and Kruglyak L (1995) Genetic dissection of complex traits, guidelines for interpreting and reporting linkage results. Nat Genet 11, 241-247. Li Z, Gastwirth JL, and Gail M (2005) Power and related statistical properties of conditional likelihood score tests for association studies in nuclear families with parental genotypes. Ann Hum Genet 69, 296-314. Li CC and Sacks L (1954) The derivation of joint distribution and correlation between relatives by the use of stochastic matrices. Biometrics 10, 347-360. Li Q, Zheng G, Liang X, and Yu, K. (2009) Robust tests for single-marker analysis in case-control genetic association studies. Ann Hum Genet 73, 245-52. Luca D, Ringquist S, Klei L, Lee AB, Gieger C, Wichmann HE, Schreiber S, Krawczak M, Lu Y, Styche A, Devlin B, Roeder K, and Trucco M (2008) On the use of general control samples for genomewide association studies: genetic matching highlights causal variants. Am J Hum Genet 82, 453-463. Lunetta KL, Faraone SV, Biederman J, and Laird NM (2000) Family-based tests of association and linkage that use unaffected sibs, covariates, and interactions. Am J Hum Genet 66, 605-614. Martin ER, Bass MP, and Kaplan NL (2001) Correcting for a potential bias in the pedigree disequilibrium test. Am J Hum Genet 68, 1065-1067. Martin ER, Monks SA, Warren LL, and Kaplan NL (2000) A test for linkage and association in general pedigrees, the pedigree disequilibrium test. Am J Hum Genet 67, 146-154. Martin ER, Kaplan NL, and Weir BS (1997) Tests for linkage and association in nuclear families. Am J Hum Genet 61, 439-448. Nielsen D, Ehm M, and Weir BS (1999) Detecting marker-disease association by testing for Hardy-Weinberg disequilibrium at a marker locus. Am J Hum Genet 63, 1531-1540. Ochi MK (1998) Ocean waves: the stochastic approach. Cambridge University Press. Olson JM (1993) Testing the Hardy-Weinberg law across strata. Ann Hum Genet 57, 291-295. O’Quigley J, Natarajan L (2004) Erosion of regression effect in a survival study. Biometrics 60, 344-351. Ott J (1974) Estimation of the recombination fraction in human pedigrees: Efficient computation of the likelihood for human linkage studies. Am J Hum Genet 26, 588-597. Ott J (1989) Statistical properties of the haplotype relative risk. Genet Epidemiol 6, 127-130. Park BU and Marron JS (1990) Comparison of Data-Driven Bandwidth Selectors. J Am Statist Assoc 85, 66-72. Pawitan Y (2001) In all likelihood: statistical modelling and inference using likelihood. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Prentice R (1976) Use of the logistic model in retrospective studies. Biometrics 32, 599-606 Prichard JK and Rosenberg NA (1999) Use of unliked genetic markers to detect population stratification in association studies. Am J Hum Genet 65, 220-228. Rabinowitz D and Laird N (2000) A unified approach to adjusting association tests for population admixture with arbitrary pedigree structure and arbitrary missing marker information. Hum Hered 50, 211-223. Rao CR (1973) Linear statistical inference and its applications. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2nd edition. Rice SO (1944) Mathematical analysis of random noise. Bell System Tech J 23, 282-332. Rieger RH, Kaplan, NL, and Weinberg CR (2001) Efficient use of siblings in testing for linkage and association. Genetic Epidemiol 20, 175-191. Risch N (2000) Searching for genetic determinants in the new millennium. Nature 405, 847-856. Risch N and Merikangas K (1996) The future of genetic studies of complex human diseases. Science 273, 1516-1517. Roy SN, Gnanadesikan R, and Srivastava JN (1971) Analysis and design of certain quantitative multireaponse experiments. Oxford: Pergamon Press. Sasieni PD (1997) From genotypes to genes: doubling the sample size. Biometrics 53, 1253-1261. Schaid DJ, McDonnell SK, Hebbring SJ, Cunningham JM, and Thibodeau SN (2005) Nonparametric tests of association of multiple genes with human disease. Am J Hum Genet 76, 780- 93. Schaid DJ and Sommer SS (1993) Genotype relative risks, methods for design and analysis of candidate-gene association studies. Am J Hum Genet 53, 1114-1126. Schulze TG and McMahon FJ (2002) Genetic association mapping at the crossroads: which test and why? Overview and practical guidelines. Am J Med Genet 114, 1-11. Self SG and Liang KY (1987) Asymptotic properties of maximum likelihood estimators and likelihood ratio tests under nonstandard conditions. J Am Stat Assoc 82, 605-610. Sinsheimer JS, McKenzie CA, Keavney B, and Lange K (2001) SNPs and snails and puppy dogs’ tails: analysis of SNP haplotype data using the gamete competition model. Ann Hum Genet 65, 483-490. Slager S and Schaid D (2001) Evaluation of candidate genes in case-control studies: a statistical method to account for related subjects. Am J Hum Genet 68, 1457-1462. Song K and Elston RC (2006) A powerful method of combining measures of association and Hardy-Weinberg disequilibrium for fine-mapping in case-control studies. Stat Med 25, 105-126. Spielman RS, McGinnis RE and Ewens WJ (1993) Transmission test for linkage disequilibrium, the insulin gene region and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus(IDDM). Am J Hum Genet 52, 506-516. Spielman RS and Ewens WJ (1998) A sibship test for linkage in the presence of association, the sib transmission/ disequilibrium test. Am J Hum Genet 62, 450-458. Sun F, Flanders WD, Yang Q, and Khoury MJ (1999) Transmission disequilibrium test (TDT) when only one parent is available, the 1-TDT. Am J Epidemiol 150, 97-104. Tai JJ, Hsiao CK (2001) Effects of implicit parameters in segregation analysis. Hum Hered 51, 192-198. Tarone RE (1981) On the distribution of the maximum of the log-rank statistics and the modified Wilcoxon statistics. Biometrics 37, 79-85. Terwilliger J and Ott J (1992) A haplotype-based ‘haplotype relative risk’ appraoch to detecting allelic ssociation. Hum Hered 42, 337-346. Tian X, Joo J, Zheng G, and Lin JP (2005) Robust trend tests for genetic association in case-control studies using family data. BMC Genet 6 (Suppl 1), S107. Tiwari HK, Barnholtz-Sloan J, Nathan Wineinger N, Padilla MA, Vaughan LK, and Allison DB (2008). Review and evaluation of methods correcting for population stratification with a focus on underlying statistical principles. Hum Hered 66, 67-86. Tukey JW (1960) A Survey of sampling from contaminated distributions. Contributions to Probability and Statistics I. Olkin, et al., ed. Stanford University Press 448-485. Tukey JW (1977) Exploratory data analysis. Reading (MA): Addison-Wesley Publishing Co. van Eeden C (1964) The relation between Pitman’s asymptotic relative efficiency of two tests and the correlation coefficient between their test statistics. Ann Math Statist 34, 1442-1451. Wang JY, Hou CD and Tai JJ (2008) A robust linkage analysis method using combined allele sharing and transmission disequilibrium information from case-parent tetrad families. Ann Hum Genet 72, 575-587. Wang JY and Tai JJ (2009) Robust quantitative trait association tests in the parent-offspring triad design: Conditional likelihood-based approaches. Ann Hum Genet 73, 231-244. Wang K and Sheffield VC (2005) A constrained-likelihood approach to marker-trait association studies. Am J Hum Genet 77, 768-780. Watson MW and Engle RF (1985) Testing for regression coefficient stability witha stationary AR(1) alternative. Rev Econ Stat 67, 341-346. Wittke-Thompson JK, Pluzhnikov A, and Cox NJ (2005) Rational inferences about departures from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. Am J Hum Genet 76, 967-986. Ylvisaker ND (1965) The expected number of zeros of a stationary Gaussian process. Ann Math Statist 36, 1043-1046. Yuan M, Tian X, Zheng G, and Yang Y (2009) Adaptive transmission disequilibrium test for family trio design. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol 8, 1-20. Zang Y, Wing F K, Zheng G (2010) Simple algorithms to calculate asymptotic null distributions of robust tests in case-control genetic association studies in R. J Stat 33, 1-24. Zhao H (2000) Family-based association studies. Stat Methods Med Res 9, 563-587. Zheng G (2008) Analysis of ordered categorical data: Two score-independent approaches. Biometrics 64, 1276-1279. Zheng G (2004) Maximizing a family of optimal statistics over a nuisance parameter with applications to genetic data analysis. Appl Stat 31, 661-671. Zheng G (2003) Use of max and min scores for trend tests for association when the genetic model is unknown. Stat Med 22, 2657-2666. Zheng G and Chen Z (2005) Comparison of maximum statistics for hypothesis testing when a nuisance parameter is present only under the alternative. Biometrics 61, 254-258. Zheng G, Chen Z, and Li Z (2003) Tests for candidate-gene association using case-parents design. Ann Hum Genet 67, 589-597. Zheng G, Freidlin B, and Gastwirth JL (2002) Robust TDT-type candidate-gene association tests. Ann Hum Genet 66, 145-155. Zheng G, Freidlin B, and Gastwirth JL (2004) Using Kullback-Leibler information for model selection when the data-generating model is unknown, applications to geneic testing problems. Stat Sinica 14, 1021-1036. Zheng G, Joo J, and Yang Y (2009) Pearson’s test, trend test, and MAX are all trend tests with different types of scores. Ann Hum Genet 73, 133-1140. Zheng G and Ng HKT (2008) Genetic model selection in two-stage analysis for case-control association studies. Biostatistics 9, 391-399. Zheng G, Song K, and Elston RC (2007) Adaptive two-stage analysis of genetic association for case-control designs. Hum Hered 63, 175-186. Zheng Y, Heagerty PJ, Hsu L, and Newcomb PA (2010) On the combining family-based and population-based case-control data in association studies. Biometrics 66, 1024-1033. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/23793 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 以家庭資料為基礎探討疾病與標識基因之抗變相關性研究是近年來遺傳流行病學重要的研究方向之一,其優點在於此研究設計不受群體分層、非隨機交配與遺傳模式不確定的影響。一般家庭資料相關分析通常假設疾病之遺傳模式為累加模式,但實際上遺傳模式有可能為隱性、顯性或相乘等模式,當真實模式為隱性或顯性模式之下進行相關分析時,會發生檢定力下降的結果,採用抗變(意指可對抗遺傳模式的變動)相關檢定是解決上述問題的方法之一。在抗變遺傳相關研究領域中,直至目前為止僅有部分研究提出利用三元體資料與多病體核心家庭資料的抗變相關檢定,尚未有任何方法提出利用家族資料進行抗變相關分析。為了解決此懸宕問題,本研究採用羅吉斯回歸模式來建立疾病與候選基因間的相關聯結,並將截距項設定為家族效應參數,去描述不同家族間之異質性,在給定每個家族染病成員之下可建構家族資料之條件概似函數,再將回歸係數參數轉換為極座標後可以轉換後的新參數萃取出遺傳相關訊息,繼而推得計分統計量,再取最大統計量與小中取大有效抗變統計量進行疾病與候選基因之相關分析。模擬結果顯示此二種統計量皆為可用之相關檢定,並具有一定程度的檢定力,此足以印證本研究在遺傳模式未知的情況之下,確實提供了一個解決家族資料抗變相關分析的方法。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | In recent years, development of robust association methods for analyses of familial data has become a crucial approach for identifying genetic variants that underlie human disease. The merit of such an approach can avoid the problem of population stratification, nonrandom mating and misspecification of the genetic model. It is known that the though commonly used genetic association test statistics have been shown applicable in practical studies, their performances rely on the mode of inheritance (MOI). As a matter of fact, these tests were derived under the additive model and they would lose testing power when the underlying genetic model is misspecified (e.g., as the true model is recessive or dominant model). Accordingly, development of robust association tests that have relatively stable powers over all plausible genetic models is necessary. Till now, robust methods have been widely proposed for case-parent trios and nuclear families, but not yet for pedigrees. In this dissertation, we use conditional likelihood, based on logistic regression model, to construct the association link between a disease and a marker for pedigree data. According to the likelihood function, the score statistic can be derived under a reparameterization procedure which is adopted to extract association information from the structure of regression coefficients. The maximum statistic and maximin efficiency robust test are derived for dealing with the unknown MOI problem in analysis of candidate-gene association. Simulation results indicate that the proposed test statistics are indeed robust against the effect of misspecification of MOI on testing powers. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T05:10:11Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-100-D95842009-1.pdf: 814202 bytes, checksum: ed6fd986fae1e8cb7d1fe2ff9f774fa5 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論 1
1.1 以群體為基礎之相關分析 2 1.2 以家庭為基礎之相關分析 3 1.3 研究動機 7 1.4 研究目的 12 第二章 家族資料相關分析與三元體資料抗變相關檢定之文獻回顧13 2.1 家族資料相關分析 13 2.2 建立病體-親本三元體資料之條件概似函數 18 2.3 利用模式選取想法建立相關檢定 22 2.3.1 以Kullback-Leibler訊息進行模式選取 22 2.3.2 利用哈溫不平衡係數進行模式選取 25 2.4 利用MERT(小中取大有效抗變檢定)方法建立抗變相關檢定 28 2.5 利用極大化最佳統計量進行之抗變檢定 30 第三章 研究方法 34 3.1 建立家族資料之概似函數 35 3.2 建立概似函數之參數估計過程 41 3.2.1 對二個回歸係數進行極座標重參數化轉換 41 3.2.2 遺傳模式與角度參數的對應關係 45 3.2.3 重參數化後之家族資料概似函數與參數推論過程 49 3.2.4 計分統計量 51 3.3 利用最大統計量進行抗變檢定 53 3.3.1 以高斯過程為基礎之檢定統計量 54 3.3.2 最大統計量 55 3.4 建立小中取大有效抗變相關檢定 57 第四章 模擬研究 63 4.1 家族資料生成 63 4.2 模擬流程 66 4.3 MAX與 之型I誤差與檢定力 67 4.4 於三元體資料結構下比較不同抗變相關檢定 69 4.5 比較MAX、與TIAN ET AL. (2005)之檢定力 70 第五章 討論與建議 75 參考文獻 81 附錄 附錄I GDT、PDT-AVG與PDT-SUM檢定力比較 90 附錄II 費雪訊息 之推導 92 附錄III MAX之P值求算方法 96 附錄IV ITO矩陣 101 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 遺傳模式未知下之家族資料抗變相關檢定 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Robust Tests for Genetic Association Using Pedigree Data When Mode of Inheritance Is Unknown | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 99-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 博士 | |
dc.contributor.coadvisor | 張淑惠 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳秀熙,鄭明燕,侯家鼎,沈葆聖,郭炤裕 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 條件羅吉斯回歸,高斯過程,最大統計量,小中取大有效抗變檢定,干擾參數,重參數化, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Conditional logistic regression,Gaussian process,Maximum statistic,Maximin efficiency robust test,Nuisance parameter,Reparameterization, | en |
dc.relation.page | 113 | |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2011-07-16 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 公共衛生學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 流行病學與預防醫學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 流行病學與預防醫學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-100-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 795.12 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。