Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 醫學院
  3. 物理治療學系所
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/23746
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor王淑芬(Shwu-Fen Wang)
dc.contributor.authorYen-Hua Chenen
dc.contributor.author陳彥樺zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-08T05:09:37Z-
dc.date.copyright2011-10-07
dc.date.issued2011
dc.date.submitted2011-07-22
dc.identifier.citation1. Cassidy JD, Cote P, Carroll LJ, Kristman V. Incidence and course of low back pain episodes in the general population. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005;30:2817-23.
2. Deyo RA, Mirza SK, Martin BI. Back pain prevalence and visit rates: estimates from U.S. national surveys, 2002. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2006;31:2724-7.
3. Guo HR, Chang YC, Yeh WY, Chen CW, Guo YL. Prevalence of musculoskeletal disorder among workers in Taiwan: a nationwide study. J Occup Health 2004;46:26-36.
4. Hides JA, Jull GA, Richardson CA. Long-term effects of specific stabilizing exercises for first-episode low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2001;26:E243-8.
5. Panjabi MM. The stabilizing system of the spine. Part I. Function, dysfunction, adaptation, and enhancement. J Spinal Disord 1992;5:383-9; discussion 97.
6. Bogduk N, Macintosh JE. The applied anatomy of the thoracolumbar fascia. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1984;9:164-70.
7. Barker PJ, Freeman AD, Urquhart DM, Anderson CR, Briggs CA. The middle layer of lumbar fascia can transmit tensile forces capable of fracturing the lumbar transverse processes: An experimental study. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon).
8. Barker PJ, Urquhart DM, Story IH, Fahrer M, Briggs CA. The middle layer of lumbar fascia and attachments to lumbar transverse processes: implications for segmental control and fracture. Eur Spine J 2007;16:2232-7.
9. Urquhart DM, Barker PJ, Hodges PW, Story IH, Briggs CA. Regional morphology of the transversus abdominis and obliquus internus and externus abdominis muscles. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2005;20:233-41.
10. Hides J, Wilson S, Stanton W, McMahon S, Keto H, McMahon K et al. An MRI investigation into the function of the transversus abdominis muscle during 'drawing-in' of the abdominal wall. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2006;31:E175-8.
11. Hides J, Stanton W, Freke M, Wilson S, McMahon S, Richardson C. MRI study of the size, symmetry and function of the trunk muscles among elite cricketers with and without low back pain. Br J Sports Med 2008;42:809-13.
12. Barker PJ, Briggs CA, Bogeski G. Tensile transmission across the lumbar fasciae in unembalmed cadavers: effects of tension to various muscular attachments. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004;29:129-38.
13. Barker PJ, Guggenheimer KT, Grkovic I, Briggs CA, Jones DC, Thomas CD et al. Effects of tensioning the lumbar fasciae on segmental stiffness during flexion and extension: Young Investigator Award winner. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2006;31:397-405.
14. Hodges P, Kaigle HA, Holm S, Ekstrom L, Cresswell A, Hansson T et al. Intervertebral stiffness of the spine is increased by evoked contraction of transversus abdominis and the diaphragm: in vivo porcine studies. Spine 2003;28:2594-601.
15. Cresswell AG, Grundstrom H, Thorstensson A. Observations on intra-abdominal pressure and patterns of abdominal intra-muscular activity in man. Acta Physiol Scand 1992;144:409-18.
16. Cresswell AG, Oddsson L, Thorstensson A. The influence of sudden perturbations on trunk muscle activity and intra-abdominal pressure while standing. Exp Brain Res 1994;98:336-41.
17. Cresswell AG, Thorstensson A. The role of the abdominal musculature in the elevation of the intra-abdominal pressure during specified tasks. Ergonomics 1989;32:1237-46.
18. Hodges PW, Eriksson AE, Shirley D, Gandevia SC. Intra-abdominal pressure increases stiffness of the lumbar spine. J Biomech 2005;38:1873-80.
19. Hodges P, Kaigle Holm A, Holm S, Ekstrom L, Cresswell A, Hansson T et al. Intervertebral stiffness of the spine is increased by evoked contraction of transversus abdominis and the diaphragm: in vivo porcine studies. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2003;28:2594-601.
20. Hodges PW, Richardson CA. Feedforward contraction of transversus abdominis is not influenced by the direction of arm movement. Exp Brain Res 1997;114:362-70.
21. Hodges PW, Richardson CA. Contraction of the abdominal muscles associated with movement of the lower limb. Phys Ther 1997;77:132-42; discussion 42-4.
22. Hides JA, Wong I, Wilson SJ, Belavy DL, Richardson CA. Assessment of abdominal muscle function during a simulated unilateral weight-bearing task using ultrasound imaging. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2007;37:467-71.
23. Hodges PW, Pengel LH, Herbert RD, Gandevia SC. Measurement of muscle contraction with ultrasound imaging. Muscle Nerve 2003;27:682-92.
24. Ferreira PH, Ferreira ML, Hodges PW. Changes in recruitment of the abdominal muscles in people with low back pain: ultrasound measurement of muscle activity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004;29:2560-6.
25. Hodges PW, Moseley GL, Gabrielsson A, Gandevia SC. Experimental muscle pain changes feedforward postural responses of the trunk muscles. Exp Brain Res 2003;151:262-71.
26. Hodges PW, Richardson CA. Inefficient muscular stabilization of the lumbar spine associated with low back pain. A motor control evaluation of transversus abdominis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1996;21:2640-50.
27. Hodges PW, Richardson CA. Delayed postural contraction of transversus abdominis in low back pain associated with movement of the lower limb. J Spinal Disord 1998;11:46-56.
28. Hodges PW, Richardson CA. Altered trunk muscle recruitment in people with low back pain with upper limb movement at different speeds. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999;80:1005-12.
29. Critchley DJ, Coutts FJ. Abdominal muscle function in chronic low back pain patients: measurement with real-time ultrasound scanning. Physiotherapy 2002;88:322-32.
30. Teyhen DS, Bluemle LN, Dolbeer JA, Baker SE, Molloy JM, Whittaker J et al. Changes in lateral abdominal muscle thickness during the abdominal drawing-in maneuver in those with lumbopelvic pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2009;39:791-8.
31. Hides JA, Belavy DL, Cassar L, Williams M, Wilson SJ, Richardson CA. Altered response of the anterolateral abdominal muscles to simulated weight-bearing in subjects with low back pain. Eur Spine J 2009;18:410-8.
32. Hides J, Hughes B, Stanton W. Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of regional abdominal muscle function in elite AFL players with and without low back pain. Man Ther 2010.
33. Bednar DA, Orr FW, Simon GT. Observations on the pathomorphology of the thoracolumbar fascia in chronic mechanical back pain. A microscopic study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1995;20:1161-4.
34. Langevin HM, Stevens-Tuttle D, Fox JR, Badger GJ, Bouffard NA, Krag MH et al. Ultrasound evidence of altered lumbar connective tissue structure in human subjects with chronic low back pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2009;10:151.
35. Myers TW. Anatomy Trains: Myofascial Meridian for Manual and Movement Therapist. Second ed.: Churchill Livingstone; 2009.
36. Chen CS, Ingber DE. Tensegrity and mechanoregulation: from skeleton to cytoskeleton. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 1999;7:81-94.
37. Ingber DE. Tensegrity I. Cell structure and hierarchical systems biology. J Cell Sci 2003;116:1157-73.
38. Barnes MF. The basic science of myofascia release: morphological change in connective tissue. J Bodyw Mov Ther 1997;1:231-8.
39. Manheim CJ. The myofascia release manual. third ed.: SLACK Incorporated; 2001.
40. Threlkeld AJ. The effects of manual therapy on connective tissue. Phys Ther 1992;72:893-902.
41. Bell J. Massage therapy helps to increase range of motion, decrease pain and assist in healing a client with low back pain and sciatica symptoms. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2008;12:281-9.
42. Hanten WP, Chandler SD. Effects of myofascial release leg pull and sagittal plane isometric contract-relax techniques on passive straight-leg raise angle. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1994;20:138-44.
43. LeBauer A, Brtalik R, Stowe K. The effect of myofascial release (MFR) on an adult with idiopathic scoliosis. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2008;12:356-63.
44. Renan-Ordine R, Alburquerque-Sendin F, de Souza DP, Cleland JA, Fernandez-de-Las-Penas C. Effectiveness of myofascial trigger point manual therapy combined with a self-stretching protocol for the management of plantar heel pain: a randomized controlled trial. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2011;41:43-50.
45. McMeeken JM, Beith ID, Newham DJ, Milligan P, Critchley DJ. The relationship between EMG and change in thickness of transversus abdominis. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2004;19:337-42.
46. Springer BA, Mielcarek BJ, Nesfield TK, Teyhen DS. Relationships among lateral abdominal muscles, gender, body mass index, and hand dominance. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2006;36:289-97.
47. Hides JA, Miokovic T, Belavy DL, Stanton WR, Richardson CA. Ultrasound imaging assessment of abdominal muscle function during drawing-in of the abdominal wall: an intrarater reliability study. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2007;37:480-6.
48. Mannion AF, Pulkovski N, Gubler D, Gorelick M, O'Riordan D, Loupas T et al. Muscle thickness changes during abdominal hollowing: an assessment of between-day measurement error in controls and patients with chronic low back pain. Eur Spine J 2008;17:494-501.
49. Koppenhaver SL, Hebert JJ, Fritz JM, Parent EC, Teyhen DS, Magel JS. Reliability of rehabilitative ultrasound imaging of the transversus abdominis and lumbar multifidus muscles. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009;90:87-94.
50. Jhu J-L. Quantitative assessment of the use of ultrasound feedback during abdominal drawing-in maneuver Taipei: National Taiwan University; 2008.
51. Mannion AF, Pulkovski N, Toma V, Sprott H. Abdominal muscle size and symmetry at rest and during abdominal hollowing exercises in healthy control subjects. J Anat 2008;213:173-82.
52. Rankin G, Stokes M, Newham DJ. Abdominal muscle size and symmetry in normal subjects. Muscle Nerve 2006;34:320-6.
53. Benjamin M. The fascia of the limbs and back--a review. J Anat 2009;214:1-18.
54. Jhong-Lin Jhu C-LW, Yio-Wha Shau, Shwu-Fen Wang. Anthropometric factors influencing lateral sliding of musclefascia junction and thickness of transversus abdominis and internal oblique muscles measured with ultrasound imaging. Formosan J Phys Ther 2010;35:201-9.
55. Ainscough-Potts AM, Morrissey MC, Critchley D. The response of the transverse abdominis and internal oblique muscles to different postures. Man Ther 2006;11:54-60.
56. Barker PJ, Briggs CA. Attachments of the posterior layer of lumbar fascia. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1999;24:1757-64.
57. Barker PJ, Freeman AD, Urquhart DM, Anderson CR, Briggs CA. The middle layer of lumbar fascia can transmit tensile forces capable of fracturing the lumbar transverse processes: an experimental study. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2010;25:505-9.
58. Daggfeldt K, Thorstensson A. The role of intra-abdominal pressure in spinal unloading. J Biomech 1997;30:1149-55.
59. Cholewicki J, Juluru K, Radebold A, Panjabi MM, McGill SM. Lumbar spine stability can be augmented with an abdominal belt and/or increased intra-abdominal pressure. Eur Spine J 1999;8:388-95.
60. Cholewicki J, Juluru K, McGill SM. Intra-abdominal pressure mechanism for stabilizing the lumbar spine. J Biomech 1999;32:13-7.
61. Hodges PW. Changes in motor planning of feedforward postural responses of the trunk muscles in low back pain. Exp Brain Res 2001;141:261-6.
62. Hides JA, Richardson CA, Jull GA. Multifidus muscle recovery is not automatic after resolution of acute, first-episode low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1996;21:2763-9.
63. Giesecke T, Gracely RH, Grant MA, Nachemson A, Petzke F, Williams DA et al. Evidence of augmented central pain processing in idiopathic chronic low back pain. Arthritis Rheum 2004;50:613-23.
64. Langevin HM. Potential Role of Fascia in Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain Humana Press; 2008.
65. Fuller B. Tensegrity. Portfolio Artnews Annual 1961;4:112-27.
66. Levin SM. A suspensory system for the sacrum in pelvic mechanics: biotensegrity. In: Vleeming A, Mooney, V., Stoeckart, R editor. Movement, Stability and Lumbopelvic Pain. 2 ed. London: Churchill Livingstone; 2007. p 229-37.
67. Panjabi MM. The stabilizing system of the spine. Part II. Neutral zone and instability hypothesis. J Spinal Disord 1992;5:390-6; discussion 7.
68. Dean P. Currier RMN. Dynamics of human biologic tissues. F.A. Davis; 1992.
69. Videman T. Connective tissue and immobilization. Key factors in musculoskeletal degeneration? Clin Orthop Relat Res 1987:26-32.
70. Woo SL, Matthews JV, Akeson WH, Amiel D, Convery FR. Connective tissue response to immobility. Correlative study of biomechanical and biochemical measurements of normal and immobilized rabbit knees. Arthritis Rheum 1975;18:257-64.
71. Cantu R, Grodin, AJ Myofascial manipulation : theory and clinical application 2nd ed ed. Gaithersburg: Aspen Publishers; 2001.
72. Williams PE, Goldspink G. Connective tissue changes in immobilised muscle. J Anat 1984;138 ( Pt 2):343-50.
73. Williams PE, Catanese T, Lucey EG, Goldspink G. The importance of stretch and contractile activity in the prevention of connective tissue accumulation in muscle. J Anat 1988;158:109-14.
74. Yahia L, Rhalmi S, Newman N, Isler M. Sensory innervation of human thoracolumbar fascia. An immunohistochemical study. Acta Orthop Scand 1992;63:195-7.
75. Remvig L ER, Patjin J. Myofascial release: an evidence-based treatment approach? Int Musculoskel Med 2008;30:29-35.
76. Meltzer KR, Cao TV, Schad JF, King H, Stoll ST, Standley PR. In vitro modeling of repetitive motion injury and myofascial release. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2010;14:162-71.
77. Bouffard NA, Cutroneo KR, Badger GJ, White SL, Buttolph TR, Ehrlich HP et al. Tissue stretch decreases soluble TGF-beta1 and type-1 procollagen in mouse subcutaneous connective tissue: evidence from ex vivo and in vivo models. J Cell Physiol 2008;214:389-95.
78. Kiesel KB, Uhl TL, Underwood FB, Rodd DW, Nitz AJ. Measurement of lumbar multifidus muscle contraction with rehabilitative ultrasound imaging. Man Ther 2007;12:161-6.
79. Jhong-Lin Jhu H-MC, Chung-Li Wang, Yio-Wha Shau, Tyng-Guey Wang, Shwu-Fen Wang. Quantitative assessment of abdominal drawing-in maneuver using ultrasound feedback in asymptomatic subjects. Formosan Journal of Physical Therapy 2009;34:244-52.
80. Jhu JL, Chai HM, Jan MH, Wang CL, Shau YW, Wang SF. Reliability and relationship between 2 measurements of transversus abdominis dimension taken during an abdominal drawing-in maneuver using a novel approach of ultrasound imaging. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2010;40:826-32.
81. Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of Clinical Research-Application to practice. 3 ed.: Pearson education, Inc; 2009.
82. O'Sullivan P, Twomey L, Allison G, Sinclair J, Miller K. Altered patterns of abdominal muscle activation in patients with chronic low back pain. Aust J Physiother 1997;43:91-8.
83. Brown SH, Banuelos K, Ward SR, Lieber RL. Architectural and morphological assessment of rat abdominal wall muscles: comparison for use as a human model. J Anat 2010.
84. Jhong-Lin Jhu H-MC, Mei-Hwa Jan, Chung-Li Wang, Yio-Wha Shau, Shwu-Fen Wang. Reliability and Relationship Between 2 Measurements of Transversus Abdominis Dimension Taken During an Abdominal Drawing-in Maneuver Using a Novel Approach of Ultrasound Imaging. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2010.
85. Janda V. On the concept of postural muscles and posture in man. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy 1983;29:83-4.
86. Huang SY, Di Santo M, Wadden KP, Cappa DF, Alkanani T, Behm DG. Short-duration massage at the hamstrings musculotendinous junction induces greater range of motion. J Strength Cond Res 2010;24:1917-24.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/23746-
dc.description.abstract背景:腹橫肌是提供脊椎穩定最深層之腹肌。腹橫肌藉由胸腰筋膜連結至脊椎上而形成了一個「肌肉-筋膜腰帶系統」。藉著此系統,腹橫肌可調節腹內壓及脊椎節間動作的控制並達成脊椎的穩定。下背痛病人的腹橫肌表現較正常人差,且胸腰筋膜上呈現沾黏等退化情形。但前人的研究主要探討腹橫肌前側端點的表現,將後側端點視為固定端,而忽略了肌肉-筋膜腰帶系統的完整性。此外,筋膜放鬆術應可改善筋膜的沾黏情形並回復肌肉筋膜腰帶系統的張力平衡。
目的:本實驗的目的為:1) 建立以超音波影像測量後側腹橫肌信度;2) 探討
腹橫肌前後端點之間超音波測量參數之相關性;3) 比較慢性下背痛病人與無症狀受試者之腹橫肌前後筋膜肌肉交點肌肉厚度、滑動及肌肉長度;4) 在一分鐘的筋摸放鬆術後,腹橫肌表現的立即改變。
方法:信度實驗收取10位無下背痛之健康受試者,在腹部內縮的動作下,建立以超音波測量後側腹橫肌單一測試者信度。主要實驗收取20位慢性下背痛及20位無下背痛之健康人。受試者於雙腳屈膝躺姿下,進行腹部內收動作並量測腹橫肌前後端點的休息及收縮肌肉厚度、肌肉筋膜交點移動及肌肉長度改變。在施予筋膜放鬆術於胸腰筋膜中點一分鐘後,立即量測放鬆後腹橫肌前後端點表現及筋膜交點移動模式變化。信度實驗以組內相關係數(Intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC(3,3)來分析。腹橫肌前後端點之間超音波測量參數之相關性以Pearson correlation分析。以三尾變異數分析(3-way ANOVA)作在兩組之間在前後側肌肉厚度、筋膜端點滑動之差異比較。兩組間放鬆前後肌肉長度變化及筋膜交點移動模式將使用雙尾變異數分析。α值設在0.05。
結果:以超音波量測無下背痛受試者中,腹橫肌後側的肌肉厚度變化及肌肉筋膜交點滑動呈現良好的信度 (ICC(3,3)=0.888-0.978)。本次實驗收錄的健康受試者中,腹橫肌前後端點之間超音波測量參數呈現中度至高度相關(Pearson correlation(r)=0.41-0.74)。在組間的比較中,下背痛的受試者的前後側肌肉收縮厚度、厚度變化及肌肉筋膜交點的滑動,在筋膜放鬆前後皆較無症狀受試者小(p<0.005)。兩組在筋膜放鬆後在肌肉收縮厚度、厚度變化及肌肉筋膜交點的滑動在兩側皆有顯著有進步(p<0.001)。下背痛的病人的前後肌肉肌膜交點在放鬆後皆往前側(腹側)移動(p<0.001);兩組肌肉長度無論放鬆前後皆無變化(p=0.09)。比較不同位置下的量測,前側的滑動及肌肉厚度變化皆較後側量測值大。
結論:量測後側的腹橫肌提供了肌肉起始位置的資訊,發現了下背痛的受試者中,放鬆後的腰帶系統呈現往前側移動的情形,但無肌肉長度的變化。表示下背痛受試者的腹橫肌於放鬆前應處於較後側的位置上,且效果的並非來自於肌肉長度的改變。一端點的放鬆能影響整個腰帶系統的表現,使系統的張力達到新的平衡,使腹橫肌前後側的測量參數都有進步的表現,支持了肌肉肌膜張力重新分布的概念。臨床上可將張力平衡概念應用於肌肉骨骼系統,以調整改善局部張力的方式進行整體的評估及治療,提供另一個臨床思考的方向。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractBackground: The transversus abdominis (TrA) is the deepest abdominal muscle which is proposed to contribute to lumbar stability. The TrA connected to the lumbar spine via thoracolumbar fascia (TLF) and forms a musculofascial corset to modulate intra-abdominal pressure and control segmental movement of the spine. Subjects with chronic low back pain demonstrated a deficit in the performance of the TrA. Previous studies focus on measuring sliding of the anterior muscle-fascia junction but ignoring the integrity of the corset system.
Purposes: The purposes of this study are (1) to establish the intra-rater reliability of measuring the sliding of posterior muscle-fascia junction of the TrA; (2) to investigate the relationship between the anterior and posterior sites of the TrA in the muscle thickness and sliding of muscle-fascia junctions; (3)to compare the sliding of two muscle-fascia junctions (ΔX), change in thickness (ΔT) and length (ΔL) of the TrA in subjects with or without LBP; (4) to evaluate the immediate effect of manual release on the sliding of muscle-fascia junctions, the change in thickness, muscle length and pattern of displacement of muscle-fascia junctions of the TrA.
Methods: Ten participants without LBP were included in the reliability study. Forty subjects with or without chronic LBP were included. The real-time US viewed in B-mode with 5-12 MHz linear transducer was used. Participants were positioned in hook-lying to perform abdominal drawing-in maneuver (ADIM). The outcome variables included the resting thickness (Thr), the thickness during contraction (Thc), ΔT, ΔX, ΔL and displacement pattern (ΔD) of the TrA at anterior and posterior muscle-fascia junctions. Myofascial release was applied at the middle point of TLF for one minute. The reliability was analyzed using Intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). The relationship between the US measurements of the anterior and posterior muscle-fascia junctions of the TrA were analyzed with Pearson correlation. Between participants with and without LBP, three-way analysis of variance (3-way ANOVA) was used to analyze the Thr, Thc, ΔT, ΔX, between the anterior and posterior regions before and after release of the TLF. Two-way ANOVA was used to analysis the ΔL and ΔD before and after release between two groups. The α-value is set at 0.05.
Results: Measuring the thickness and sliding of muscle-fascia junction of posterior site of the TrA showed good reliability (ICC(3,3)=0.888-0.978). The correlation between the measurements between the anterior and posterior sites of the TrA were moderate to good (Pearson correlation (r)=0.41-0.74). Comparing between groups, participants with LBP revealed less thickness during contraction, change in thickness and sliding of muscle-fascia junctions at both sites (p<0.005). After myofascial release, both groups improved the change in thickness and sliding of muscle-fascia junctions at both sites (p<0.001).The LBP group demonstrated an anterior-shift pattern of the muscle-fascia junctions at both end (p<0.001). The muscle length were not statistical different after release in both groups (p=0.09). The measurements at posterior site were all smaller than the anterior site.
Conclusion: Both groups improved after myofascial release, the result supported the tensegrity concept that the imbalanced tension could be adjusted from remote site. Furthermore, measuring the resting location at both site provide the evidence that the anterior-shift pattern of the musculofascial corset system in LBP group is not due to change in muscle length. Treating patients with musculoskeletal problems may need a comprehensive evaluation of the whole body, to identify the imbalance of the tension, therefore may provide an optimal treatment for patients with musculoskeletal problems.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T05:09:37Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-100-R97428010-1.pdf: 3509392 bytes, checksum: f4fa5b3dc959d0f6b88417a4e1f770d6 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2011
en
dc.description.tableofcontents口試委員會審定書……………………………………………………….i
誌謝………………………………………………………………………ii
摘要………………………………………………………………………iii
Abstract …………………………………………………………………v
Chapter 1 Introduction 1
1.1 Background 1
1.2 Purposes 5
1.3 Research questions 5
1.4 Hypotheses 6
Chapter 2 Literature Review 9
2.1 The TrA attached to the lumbar spine with the TLF to form a musculofascial corset to increased IAP and control segmental stiffness of the spine, therefore may contribute to spinal stability. 9
2.2 Functional deficits and morphological changes of the TrA have been identified in subjects with LBP. 11
2.3 Tensegrity of fasciae and the abnormal movement patterns such as hypomobility and immobilization of the musculofascial corset after LBP may influence the mechanical property of the connective tissues surround muscles. 13
2.4 Manual release (e.g. Myofascial release) is a technique to facilitate a stretch to the restrictive fasciae to restore their normal length and orientation. 18
2.5 Ultrasonography is a valid and reliable instrument to evaluate contraction of the TrA. 20
Chapter 3 Research Methods 22
3.1 Reliability 22
3.2 The relationship between the measurements of the anterior and posterior sites of the TrA 25
3.3 Compare the difference between individuals with or without recurrent LBP among the measurement of the TrA by the US imaging and the effect of fascia release 27
Chapter 4 Results 35
4.1 Reliability 35
4.2 Relationship between the anterior and posterior site of the TrA among the measurements by the USI and anthropometric factors which correlated with measurements of the TrA 36
4.3 Comparison between participants with or without LBP and the effect of release 36
Chapter 5 Discussion 40
5.1 Reliability 40
5.2 Moderate correlation was found between US measurements at anterior and posterior sites of the TrA 40
5.3 Comparing with the asymptomatic group, patients with LBP revealed decreased sliding and change in thickness at both muscle-fascia junctions of the TrA without difference in the resting muscle length 41
5.4 Both groups demonstrated improved sliding and change in thickness of the TrA and anterior-shift of the muscle-fascia junctions without change in the length after myofascial release 43
5.5 Clinical implication 47
5.6 Limitations 48
Chapter 6 Conclusion 50
Chapter 7 References 51
Tables…………………………………………………………………...64
Table1. Reliability of measuring the performance of the TrA with US. 64
Table 2. Measurement of the performance of the TrA using US. 66
Table 3. Descriptive data of the subjects enrolled in the reliability study 68
Table 4. The reliability (ICC(3,3), SEM and CVw) of measuring the thickness and the sliding of the posterior muscle-fascia junction of the TrA during ADIM. 69
Table 5. Descriptive data of the subjects enrolled in the pilot of main study in the symptomatic group. 70
Table 6. Relationship between anterior and posterior sites of the TrA among the thickness at rest, thickness during contraction and sliding of muscle-fascia junctions in participants without LBP 71
Table 7. The measurements of the TrA by USI before release (mm) 72
Table 8. Three-way ANOVA (site, release, group) of the thickness at resting status (Thr) of the anterior and posterior sites of TrA before and after release between groups with or without LBP. 73
Table 9. Three-way ANOVA (site, release, group) of the thickness at contracted status (Thc) of the anterior and posterior sites of TrA before and after release between groups with or without LBP. 74
Table 10. Three-way ANOVA (site, release, group) of the change in thickness (ΔT) of the anterior and posterior sites of TrA before and after release between groups with or without LBP. 75
Table 11. Three-way ANOVA (site, release, group) of the percentage change in thickness (%ΔT) of the anterior and posterior sites of TrA before and after release between groups with or without LBP. 76
Table 12. Three-way ANOVA (site, release, group) of the sliding of muscle-fascia junctions (ΔX) of the anterior and posterior sites of TrA before and after release between groups with or without LBP. 77
Table 13. Post-hoc analysis (release, group) of Two-way ANOVA (site, release, group) of the sliding of muscle-fascia junctions (ΔX) of the anterior and posterior sites of TrA before and after release between groups with or without LBP. 78
Table 14. Two-way comparison of muscle length between groups before and after release. 79
Table 15. Two-way comparison of change in resting locations of muscle-fascia junctions at anterior and posterior sites after release between groups. 80
Figures………………………………………………………………….81
Figure 1. Anatomy of the TrA 81
Figure 2. A model of a tensegrity structure. 82
Figure 3. The sliding of collagen fibers 83
Figure 4. Position of the participant to perform ADIM. 84
Figure 5. The layout of the measurement of the TrA 85
Figure 6. the layout during myofascial release.. 86
Figure 7. Analyze the USI of the sliding (ΔX) of muscle-fascia junctions. 87
Figure 8. Measuring the pattern of displacement of muscle-fascia junctions 88
Figure 9. The thickness at rest (Thr) before and after release at anterior and posterior sites of the TrA between groups with or without LBP. 89
Figure 10. The thickness at contracted condition (Thc) before and after release at anterior and posterior sites of the TrA between groups with or without LBP. 90
Figure 11. The change in thickness (ΔT) before and after release at anterior and posterior sites of the TrA between groups with or without LBP. 91
Figure 12. The % change in thickness (%ΔT) before and after release at anterior and posterior sites of the TrA between groups with or without LBP. 92
Figure 13. Post-hoc comparison (group × release) of the effect of release on the two muscle-fascia junctions for individual site. 93
Figure 14. Muscle length before and after release between groups with or without LBP 94
Figure 15. Change in resting locations of muscle-fascia junctions between groups with or without LBP after release. 95
Appendixes . 96
dc.language.isoen
dc.title慢性下背痛病人腹橫肌之前後肌肉筋膜交點型態學變化—動態超音波研究zh_TW
dc.titleMorphological Change of Muscle-fascia Junctions of Transversus Abdominis in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain – Dynamic Ultrasonographic Studyen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear99-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee王崇禮,邵耀華,柴惠敏
dc.subject.keyword動態超音波影像,腹橫肌,胸腰筋膜,下背痛,筋膜放鬆,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordUltrasonography,Transversus Abdominis,Thoracolumbar Fascia,Low Back Pain,Myofascial Release,en
dc.relation.page110
dc.rights.note未授權
dc.date.accepted2011-07-22
dc.contributor.author-college醫學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept物理治療學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:物理治療學系所

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-100-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
3.43 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved