Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/23611Full metadata record
| ???org.dspace.app.webui.jsptag.ItemTag.dcfield??? | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 曾美惠(Mei-Hui Tseng) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Tzu-Han Chung | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 鍾子涵 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T05:04:41Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2011-03-03 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2011-01-26 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | American Psychiatric Association (2000). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-IV-TR. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
Ayres, A. J., Mailoux, Z. L., & Wendler, C. L. W. (1987). Developmental dyspraxia : is it a unitary function? occupational therapy journal of research, 7, 93-110. Barnett, A. L. (2008). Motor Assessment in Developmental Coordination Disorder: From Identification to Intervention. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 55(2), 113-129. Barnett, A. L., & Henderson, S. E. (1998). An annotated bibliography of studies using the TOMI/Movement ABC: 1984-1996. London, UK: The Psychological Corporation/Harcourt Brace & Company Publishers. Barnett, A. L., Sugden, D. A., & Henderson, S. E. (2007). Review of the movement ABC checklist- second edition. Paper presented at the 8th Motor Control and Human Skill Conference, Fremantle, Australia. Brown, T., & Lalor, A. (2009). The movement assessment battery for children - second edition (MABC-2): A review and critique. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 29(1), 86-103. doi: 10.1080/01942630802574908 Bruininks, R. H. (1978). Bruininks-Oseretsky test of motor proficiency. Circle Pines, Minnesota: American Guidance Service. Bruininks, R. H., & Bruininks, B. D. (2005). Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency (Second ed.). Circle pines, Minnesota: AGS Publishing. Cantell, M. H., Smyth, M. M., & Ahonen, T. P. (1994). Clumsiness in adolescence : Educational, motor, and social outcomes of motor delay detected at 5 years. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 11, 115-129. Cermak, S. (1985). Developmental Dyspraxia. Advances in Psychology, 23, 225-248. doi: 10.1016/S0166-4115(08)61143-7 Cermak, S. A., & Larkin, K. (2002). Developmental Coordination Disorder. Canada: Delmar Thomson Learning. Chow, S. M., Chan, L. L., Chan, C. P., & Lau, C. H. (2002). Reliability of the experimental version of the Movement ABC. British Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation, 9(10), 404-407. Cools, W., Martelaer, K. D., Samaey, C., & Andries, C. (2009). Movement skill assessment of typically developing preschool children: A review of seven movement skill assessment tool. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 8, 154-168. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297-334. doi: 10.1007/BF02310555 Dewey, D., & Wilson, B. N. (2001). Developmental coordination disorder : What is it? Physical and Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 20(2-3), 5-27. doi: 10.1080/J006v20n02_02 Geuze, R. H., & Boerger, H. (1993). Children who are clumsy :Five years later. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 10, 10-21. Geuze, R. H., Jongmans, M. J., Schoemaker, M. M., & Smits-Engelsman, B. C. (2001). Clinical and research diagnostic criteria for developmental coordination disorder: A review and discussion. Human Movement Science, 20(1-2), 7-47. doi: 10.1016/S0167-9457(01)00027-6 Gillberg, I. C. (1985). Children with minor neurodevelopmental disorders. III: Neurological and neurodevelopmental problems at age 10. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 27(1), 3-16. Gillberg, I. C., & Gillberg, C. (1989). Children with preschool minor neurodevelopmental disorders. Iv: Behaviour and school achievement at age 13. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 31(1), 3-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1989.tb08406.x Gillberg, I. C., Gillberg, C., & Groth, J. (1989). Children with preschool minor neurodevelopmental disorders, V: Neurodevelopmental profiles at age 13. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 31(1), 14-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1989.tb08407.x Green, D., Bishop, T., Wilson, B. N., Crawford, S., Hooper, R., Kaplan, B., & Baird, G. (2005). Is questionnaire-based screening part of the solution to waiting lists for children with developmental coordination disorder? British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 68, 2-10. Gubbay, S. S. (1975). Clumsy children in normal schools. Medical Journal of Australia, 1(8), 233-236. Hay, J. A., Hawes, R., & Faught, B. E. (2004). Evaluation of a screening instrument for developmental coordination disorder. Journal of Adolescent Health, 34(4), 308-313. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2003.07.004 S1054139X03002684 [pii] Hellgren, L., Gillberg, I. C., Bagenholm, A., & Gillberg, C. (1994). Children with deficits in attention, motor control, and perception (DAMP) almost grown up : Psychiatric and personality disorders at age 16 years. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 35(7), 1255-1271. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1994.tb01233.x Henderson, S. E., & Barnett, A. L. (1998). The classification of specific motor coordination disorders in children: Some problems to be solved. Human Movement Science, 17(4-5), 449-469. doi: 10.1016/S0167-9457(98)00009-8 Henderson, S. E., & Hall, D. (1982). Concomitants of clumsiness in young schoolchildren. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 24(4), 448-460. Henderson, S. E., & Sugden, D. A. (1992). Movement assessment battery for children. Kent, UK: The Psychological Corporation. Henderson, S. E., Sugden, D. A., & Barnett, A. L. (2007). Movement assessment battery for children-2 (Second ed.). London, UK: The Psychological Corporation. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. Joreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (2000). LISREL 8.8. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International, Inc. Kadesjo, B., & Gillberg, C. (1999). Developmental coordination disorder in Swedish 7-year-old children. Journal of the Amedican Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiarty, 38(7), 820-828. doi: 10.1097/00004583-199907000-00011 Lin, K. H., & Wu, S. K. (2002). Seven to eight year-old children with Developmental Coordintation Disorder in Taiwan. Formosan Journal of Physical Therapy, 27, 238-248. Losse, A., Henderson, S. E., Elliman, D., Hall, D., Knight, E., & Jongmans, M. (1991). Clumsiness in children--do they grow out of it? A 10-year follow-up study. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 33(1), 55-68. Mandich, A., & Polatajko, H. J. (2003). Developmental coordination disorder: mechanisms, measurement and management. Hum Mov Sci, 22(4-5), 407-411. doi: S0167945703000630 [pii] Marchiori, G. E., Wall, A. E., & Bedlingfield, W. (1987). Kinematic analysis of skill acquisition in physically awkward boys. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 4(4), 305-315. Martini, R., & Polatajko, J. (1998). Verbal self-guidance as a treatment approach for children with developmental coordination disorder : a systematic replication study. occupational therapy journal of research, 18(4), 157-181. Missiuna, C. (1994). Motor skill acquisition in children with developmental coordination disorder. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 11(2), 214-235. Missiuna, C., & Polatajko, H. (1995). Developmental dyspraxia by any other name: Are they all just clumsy children? American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 49(7), 619-627. Peters, J. M., Barnett, A. L., & Henderson, S. E. (2001). Clumsiness, dyspraxia and developmental co-ordination disorder: how do health and educational professionals in the UK define the terms? Child: Care, Health and Development, 27(5), 399-412. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2214.2001.00217.x Polatajko, H., Fox, M., & Missiuna, C. (1995). An international consensus on children with developmental coordination disorder. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 62(1), 3-6. Portney, L. G., & Watkins, M. P. (2000). Foundations of Clinical Research: Application to Practice (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc. Rihtman, T., Wilson, B. N., & Parush, S. (2010). Development of the Little Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire for preschoolers and preliminary evidence of its psychometric properties in Israel. Research in Developmental Disabilities (Accepted). Rothman, K. J., Greenland, S., & Lash, T. L. (2008). Modern epidemiology (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Saha, I., & Paul, B. (2010). Biostatistics. Kolkata: Academic Publishers. Schoemaker, M. M., Flapper, B., Verheij, N. P., Wilson, B. N., Reinders-Messelink, H. A., & de Kloet, A. (2006). Evaluation of the Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire as a screening instrument. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 48(8), 668-673. doi: S001216220600140X [pii] 10.1017/S001216220600140X Schoemaker, M. M., Smits-Engelsman, B. C., & Jongmans, M. J. (2003). Psychometric properties of the movement assessment battery for children-checklist as a screening instrument for children with a developmental co-ordination disorder. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 73(Pt 3), 425-441. Smits-Engelsman, B. C., Wilson, P. H., Westenberg, Y., & Duysens, J. (2003). Fine motor deficiencies in children with developmental coordination disorder and learning disabilities: an underlying open-loop control deficit. Hum Mov Sci, 22(4-5), 495-513. doi: S016794570300068X [pii] Stott, D. H., Moyes, F. A., & Henderson, S. E. (1972). Test of motor impairment. Guelph, Ontario: Department of Psychology, University of Guelph, Ontario. Sugden, D. A., & Keogh, J. F. (1990). Problems in movement skill development. Columbia: University of South California. Tseng, M. H., Fu, C. P., Wilson, B. N., & Hu, F. C. (2010). Psychometric properties of a Chinese version of the Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire in community-based children. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 31(1), 33-45. doi: S0891-4222(09)00118-8 [pii] 10.1016/j.ridd.2009.07.018 Tseng, M. H., Henderson, A., Chow, S. M. K., & Yao, G. (2004). Relationship between motor proficiency, attention, impulse, and activity in children with ADHD. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 46(6), 381-388. doi: Doi 10.1017/S0012162204000623 Visser, J., & Jongmans, M. (2004). Extending the movement assessment battery for children to be suitable for 3-year-olds in the Netherlands. Unpublished manuscript. Wilson, B. N., Crawford, S. G., Green, D., Roberts, G., Aylott, A., & Kaplan, B. J. (2009). Psychometric properties of the revised Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr, 29(2), 184-204. doi: 910781669 [pii] 10.1080/01942630902784761 Wilson, B. N., Dewey, D., & Campbell, A. (1998). Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire (DCDQ). Wilson, B. N., Kaplan, B. J., Crawford, S. G., Campbell, A., & Dewey, D. (2000). Reliability and validity of a parent questionnaire on childhood motor skills. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 54, 484-493. Wright, H. C., & Sugden, D. A. (1996). A two-step procedure for the identification of children with developmental co-ordination disorder in Singapore. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 38(12), 1099-1105. Wright, H. C., Sugden, D. A., Ng, R., & Tan, J. (1994). Identification of children with movement problems in Singapore: Usefulness of the Movement ABC Checklist. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 11, 150-150. Wu, S. K. (2002). Research in physical fitness and motor abilities in children with Developmental Coordination Disorder in Taiwan. Taipei: Ministry of Education. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/23611 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 研究目的:
發展協調障礙在國外的盛行率為4%至10%。而在台灣地區，7~8歲國小學童發展協調障礙之盛行率為3.5%，9~10歲為17.9%。然而，目前為止還沒有公開的研究關於學齡前孩童的動作發展協調之研究。發現動作發展遲緩孩童並給予及時的介入是小兒工作者的重要議題。在所有診斷發展遲緩的評估工具中，問卷是最有效率的工具，且動作發展問卷是最被廣泛使用的工具。因此，本研究的目的是編譯中文版幼兒發展協調問卷，此問卷是根據動作發展問卷設計且對象為3~4.9歲的兒童，我們擴展此問卷的年齡到5.9歲，研究對象為學齡前的孩童。此研究的第二個目的為建立中文版本之初步心理計量特性。 研究方法: 首先將幼兒動作發展協調問卷翻譯為中文並作跨文化的編譯及修訂。研究對象為1124位社區幼稚園的小朋友(平均年齡=59.05月， 標準差=8.40月，女生=530(47.2%), 男生=594(52.8%))，年齡皆在3~5.9歲間。所有小朋友的家長皆須填答中文版幼兒動作發展協調問卷。內在一致性檢驗為使用所有社區樣本的小朋友，再測信度檢驗為使用115位間隔二至三星期之社區樣本的小朋友(平均年齡=57.29月, 標準差=9.81月) 。施測者間信度檢驗為比較教師和家長填答同一位小朋友的分數，共48分(平均年齡=57.53月, 標準差=9.80月)。驗證性因素分析檢驗為使用社區樣本。區辨效度檢驗為比較發展協調障礙組、疑似發展協調障礙組、及非協調障礙組之中文版幼兒動作發展協調問卷之分數。同時效度檢驗為計算中文版幼兒動作發展協調問卷之分數和第二版兒童動作能力測驗之分數。敏感性及特異性檢驗為使用社區樣本。 結果: 此問卷的內在一致性為0.95，代表有高度的內在一致性。再測信度為0.97，代表好的再測信度。施測者間信度為0.45，代表差的施測者間信度。驗證性因素分析的值支持最初的三個因素模式(CFI=0.999, NNFI=0.998, RMSEA=0.028, SRMR=0.014, χ2=109.51,df=58)。區辨效度在單因子變異數分析顯示組間的幼兒動作協調問卷有統計上的顯著(F(2,159=24.41), p<0.001)。同時效度部分，第二版兒童動作能力測驗的總分和幼兒動作協調問卷總分有中度相關(N=162, r=0.52, p<0.001)。已MABC-2≦15%為標準，LDCDQ-C≦15%為切點時，敏感度為96%，特異性為68%。 結論: 本研究結果顯示，中文版幼兒動作發展協調問卷使用在台灣時具有可接受的信度及效度。且三個因素模式提供我們建立孩童治療活動的參考。因為LDCDQ-C無法區辨發展協調障礙組和疑似發展協調障礙組，因此，我們建議診斷發展協調障礙孩童最洽當的方法為將幼兒動作發展協調問卷當作篩檢工具，使用更進一步的標準化動作測驗為確認診斷的工具。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Objectives: In Taiwan, the estimated prevalence of Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD) is 3.5% and 17.9% in children of ages between 7 and 8, and between 9 and 10, respectively. However, to our knowledge, no published studies are concerned with the prevalence of DCD in preschool children of 3 to 5 years old. Identifying children with DCD for timely intervention is a critical issue for pediatric professionals. Among the assessment tools for DCD, questionnaires are the most efficient, and the Development Coordination Disorder Questionnaire (DCDQ) is a widely used questionnaire. Little DCDQ (LDCDQ) based on DCDQ was developed for children between the ages of 3-4.9years old by Rihtman, Wilson, & Parush (Rihtman, Wilson, & Parush, 2010). The aims of this study were to translate and culturally adapt the LDCDQ into Chinese and examine its psychometric properties when used with Taiwanese preschool children.
Methods: The LDCDQ was translated and culturally adapted into Chinese (LDCDQ-C). The participants were 1124 typically developing children (mean age=59.05 months, SD=8.40 months) from eight nursery schools and fourteen kindergartens in Taiwan. Among them, there were 530 girls (47.2%) and 594 boys (52.8%).. All children were aged between 3 to 5.9 years. Parents of all the children completed the LDCDQ-C. Test-retest reliability was examined by using 115 typically developing children (mean age=57.29 months, SD=9.81 months) in a 2-3 week interval. Inter-rater reliability was examined by comparing the 48 questionnaires (mean age=57.53months. SD=9.80 months) filled out by teachers with those by parents. The discriminant validity was examined by comparing the LDCDQ-C total scores of DCD, suspect DCD, and non-DCD groups as defined by their performance on the MABC-2. The concurrent validity was examined by computing the correlation between the total scores of LDCDQ and those of the MABC-2 on 162 children. The sensitivity and specificity were examined using the 15th of the MABC-2 as the criterion and15th of the LDCDQ-C as the cutoff. Results: As regards internal consistency, Cronbach alpha was 0.95 which was above the acceptable level of 0.70. The test-retest reliability with a 2-week interval for the total score was r = 0.97, indicating good test-retest reliability. The inter-rater reliability between the child’s teacher and parents was r =0.45, indicating poor inter-rater reliability. Results of confirmatory factor analysis showed that the fit indices for the three-factor model were CFI=0.999, NNFI=0.998, RMSEA=0.028, SRMR=0.014, χ2=109.51, and d.f.=58, indicating a good fit. One-way ANOVA showed a significant group difference in the total score of the LDCDQ-C (F(2,159)=24.41, p<0.001). The results of post hoc tests, using the Scheffe’s test, showed that the non-DCD group scored significantly higher than the DCD (p<0.001) and the suspect DCD group (p<0.001) but the latter two groups did not differ significantly (p=0.781, mean difference= 2.32).The total score of LDCDQ-C showed moderate correlation with the total score of the MABC-2 (N=162, r=0.52, p<0.001). The sensitivity was 0.96 and the specificity was 0.68. Conclusions: This questionnaire demonstrated an acceptable reliability and validity when used in Taiwanese preschoolers. Furthermore, the three-factor model provides implication for establishing children’s treatment program. However, due to the fact that the LDCDQ-C can’t differentiate children with DCD from suspect- DCD, further standardized performance-based assessments are recommended to confirm children’s motor coordination problems and the degree of severity. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T05:04:41Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-100-R98429011-1.pdf: 553549 bytes, checksum: 175db569a129ca3fb7a005cb855935a9 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | Introduction 1
Literature Review 4 Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD) 4 The Diagnosis Criteria of Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD) 5 The assessment tools for identifying DCD 5 Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire (DCDQ) 7 Movement Assessment Battery for Children Checklist (MABC), Movement Assessment Battery for Children Checklist -2,(MABC2) 8 Children’s Self-Perception of Adequacy in, and Prediction for Physical Activity Scale, (CSAPPA scale) 9 Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proiciency, second edition (BOT-2) 9 Movement Assessment Battery for Children-2, (MABC-2) 10 Summary of the literature review 12 Methods 15 Phase I-The Translation Process of the Little Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire 15 Instruments 15 Procedures 16 Phase II- The reliability of the Chinese version of The Little Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire (LDCDQ-C) 18 Participants 18 Instruments 18 Procedures 19 Data analysis 20 Results 21 Discussion 23 Phase III- The validity of the Chinese version of The Little Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire (LDCDQ-C) 25 Participants 25 Instruments 25 Procedures 26 Data analysis 27 Results 29 Discussion 30 Conclusions 33 Acknowledgement 34 References 35 Tables 45 Figures 56 Appendices 59 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.title | 中文版幼兒動作協調問卷之心理計量特性之研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Psychometric Properties of a Chinese Version of the Little Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire (LDCDQ-C) | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 99-1 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 姚開屏,林巾凱 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 中文版幼兒動作協調問卷,發展協調障礙,信度,效度, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Chinese version of the Little Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire,developmental coordination disorder,reliability,validity, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 61 | |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2011-01-26 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 醫學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 職能治療研究所 | zh_TW |
| Appears in Collections: | 職能治療學系 | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-100-1.pdf Restricted Access | 540.58 kB | Adobe PDF |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.