請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/23582
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 戴政(John Jen Tai) | |
dc.contributor.author | Yan-Zhen Liu | en |
dc.contributor.author | 劉妍甄 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T05:04:16Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2011-03-03 | |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2011-02-09 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 1. 戴 政(2002) 遺傳流行病學-基因定位之遺傳設計與分析方法。藝軒,台北。
2. Allen G, Harvald B and Shields J (1967) Measures of twin concordance. Acta Genet Statist Med (Basel) 17:475-481 3. Allen G and Hrubec Z (1979) Twin concordance: a more general model. Acta Genet Med Gemellol (Roma) 28:3-13 4. Bartfay E, Donner A and Klar N (1999) Testing the equality of twin correlations with multinomial outcomes. Annals of Human Genetics 63:341-349. 5. Betensky RA, Hudson JI, Jones CA, Hu F, Wang B, Chen C and Xu X (2001) A computationally simple test of homogeneity of odds ratios for twin data. Genetic Epidemiology 20:228-238. 6. Bryld LE, Agner T, Kyvik KO, Brondsted L, Hindsberger C and Menne T (2000). Hand eczema in twins: a questionnaire investigation. British Journal of Dermatology 142:298-305. 7. Casella G, Berger R (2002) Statistical Inference. Duxbury, Pacific Grove, CA, 2nd edition. 8. Chou LN, Kuo PH, Lin CC and Chen WJ (2010) Genetic and environmental influences on the Wisconsin card sorting test. Behavior Genetics 40:22-30. 9. Donner A and Eliasziw M (1992) A goodness-of-fit approach to inference procedures for the kappa statistic: confidence interval construction, significance-testing and sample size estimation. Statistics in Medicine 11: 1511-1519. 10. Donner A, Klar N and Eliasziw M (1995) Statistical methodology for estimating twin similarity with respect to a dichotomous trait. Genetic Epidemiology 12:267-277. 11. Eye AV and Lienert GA (1980) Nonparametric evaluation of heritability by intra-twin differences of mono-and dicygotic twins. Biometrical Journal 22:505-511. 12. Fisher RA (1925). Statistical Methods for Research Workers. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh. 13. Galton F (1876) The history of twins, as a criterion of the relative powers of nature and nurture. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 5:391-406. 14. Gao XJ, Klar N and Donner A (1997) Comparison of methods for analyzing binary data arising from two-sample twin studies. Genetic Epidemiology 14: 349-363. 15. Guo SW (2001) Does higher concordance in monozygotic twins than in dizygotic twins suggest a genetic component? Human Heredity 51: 121-132. 16. Haseman JK and Elston RC (1970) The estimation of genetic variance from twin data. Behavior Genetics, 1: 11-19. 17. Haynam GE, Govindarajulu Z and Leone GC (1970) ‘Tables of the cumulative non-central chi-square distribution’, Case Statistical Laboratory, Publication No. 104, 1962, Part of the tables have been published in Selected Tables in Mathematical Statistics Vol. 1., Edited by H. L. Harter and D. B. Owen, Markham, Chicago. 18. Holzinger KJ (1929) The relative effect of nature and nurture influences on twin differences. Journal of Educational Psychology 20( 4):241–248 19. Hrubec Z (1984) Proband concordance vs. casewise concordance. Acta Genet Med Gemellol (Roma) 33(4):579-83. 20. Hodge SE (1998) Ascertainment. In Encyclopedia of biostatistics. New York: Wiley, vol 2 21. Hopper JL (1998) Twin concordance. In Encyclopedia of Biostatistics. London: Wiley, vol 6 22. Hindsberger C and Bryld LE (2003) Analysis of twin data ascertained through probands: the double-entry approach. Genetic Epidemiology 25:225-235. 23. Johnson NL and Kotz S (1970). Distributions in Statistics: Continuous Univariate Distributions—2. New York: Wiley. 24. Huang JK and Tai JJ (2007) Twin concordances test for ascertained trichotomous traits data. Statistics in Medicine 26:869-894. 25. Kempthorne O and Osborne R (1961) The interpretation of twin data. American Journal of Human Genetics, 13: 320–339. 26. Kraemer HE and Bloch DA (1989) 2 ×2 Kappa Coefficients: Measures of Agreement or Association. Biometrics, 45: 269-287. 27. Li CC and Mantel N (1968) A simple method of estimating the segregation ratio under complete ascertainment. American Journal of Human Genetics 20: 61-81. 28. McGue M (1992) When assessing twin concordance, use the probandwise not the pairwise rate. Schizophr Bull 18:171-176. 29. Mantel N and Haenszel W (1959) Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease Journal of the National Cancer Institute 22: 719-48. 30. Morton ME (1959) Genetic tests under incomplete ascertainment. The American Journal of Human Genetics 11, No.1. 31. Murray GD (2005) Missing Data in Clinical Trials. In Encyclopedia of biostatistics. New York: Wiley, vol 2 32. Olson JM, Witte JS and Elston RC (1996) Association within twin pairs for a dichotomous trait. Genetic Epidemiology 13: 489-499. 33. Pearson K (1896) Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution – III. Regression, heredity and panmixia Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Series A 187: 253-318. 34. Rao CR (1973) Linear Statistical Inference, 2nd Ed.Wiley, New York. 35. Ramakrishnan V, Goldberg J, Henderson WG, Eisen SA, True W, Lyons MJ and Tsuang MT (1992) Elementary methods for the analysis of dichotomous outcomes in unselected samples of twins. Genetic Epidemiology 9: 273-287. 36. Smith C (1974) Concordance in twins: methods and interpretation. American Journal of Human Genetics 26:454-466. 37. Stafford RE (1969) The Case for Nonparametric Statistics in the Analysis of Twin Data. Human Heredity 19:601-618. 38. Tang ML, Tang NS and Carey VJ (2006) Sample size determination for 2-step studies with dichotomous response. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 136:1166-1180. 39. Tate MW and Hyer LA (1973) Inaccuracy of the test of goodness of fit when expected frequencies are small. Journal of the American Statistical Association 68:836-841. 40. Thomas DC (2004) Statistical Methods in Genetic Epidemiology, Oxford University Press, Oxford. 41. Wald A (1943) Tests of Statistical Hypotheses Concerning Several Parameters When the Number of Observations is Large. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 54: 426-482. 42. Weinberg W (1928) Mathematische Grundlagen der Probandenmethode, Zeitschrift f‥ur Induktive Abstammungs-und Vererbungslehre 48:179-228. 43. Witte JS, Carlin JB and Hopper JL (1999) Likelihood-based approach to estimating twin concordance for dichotomous traits. Genetic Epidemiology 16: 290-304. 44. Williams CJ (1993) On the covariance between parameter estimates in models of twin data. Biometrics 49: 557–568. 45. Williams CJ (1998) A comparison of tests for detecting genetic variance from human twin data based on absolute intratwin differences. Communications in Statistics: Simulation Computation 27(1): 51-65. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/23582 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 雙胞對研究常被用於尋找遺傳疾病的初期相關證據階段,倘若疾病確實由遺傳所控制,在MZ(同卵雙胞對)及DZ(異卵雙胞對)共享非遺傳效應因子(如,環境因子)之假設下,可由資料顯示出MZ雙胞對內兩個體的相似程度高於DZ雙胞對內的相似程度。完全隨機取樣設計下,衡量雙胞對組內兩個個體二元性狀資料相似程度的測度已有學者提出討論,但是當疾病盛行率過低或是考量成本效益,隨機取樣設計下的雙胞對資料在取得上有困難度,引入鑑取設計收集資料是一個可行的替代方式。因鑑取雙胞對二元性狀資料缺失正常個體易導致雙胞對兩個體的相似性不易被測得,惟病體狀態相符度以及成對狀態相符度能夠直接測量此鑑取資料之相似程度。在這個研究當中,我們沿用這個測度並討論不同鑑取設計下三種以概似函數為基礎的檢定統計量,包括Wald檢定、計分檢定及概度比檢定並計算不同鑑取研究設計下檢定量的所需樣本數。模擬結果中評估統計量在鑑取研究設計下參數組合的型一錯誤率和檢定力的優劣,最後建議研究者在特定的情況下可以採用的統計量以及進行鑑取雙胞對家族聚集性研究時的所需樣本數多寡。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | The classical twin study has provided a useful tool for investigating the existence of genetic influences on a disease. A variety of methods have been proposed for analysis of twin data with dichotomous traits. Of these methods some are applied to randomly sampled twin data and some to ascertained twin data. Collection of twin pairs data by ascertainment is required when we study a rare disease or consider the cost-effectiveness. The common approach used in analysis of the ascertained dichotomous twin data is to test the equality of casewise or pairwise concordance between monozygotic (MZ) and dizygotic (DZ) twins. Significant test result indicates the potential role of genetic factors played in the development of a disease under the assumption that MZ twin pairs share nongentic effects to the same extent as DZ twin pairs. In this research, we aim to evaluate the applicability of likelihood-based concordance tests for ascertained dichotomous twin pair data and derive the formulas for calculation of the required sample sizes as well. The six tests which include the Wald, score and likelihood ratio tests are taken into account under the different ascertainment design. Simulations are conducted to compare the empirical type I errors and powers for these test statistics under medium or small sample size. Required sample sizes and the corresponding empirical powers are obtained and discussed for the above-mentioned tests. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T05:04:16Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-100-F93842019-1.pdf: 723466 bytes, checksum: 9103a31e984969a2e69da2c2b0022706 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 i
誌謝 ii 中文摘要 iv Abstract v 目錄 vi 表目錄 1 第一章 緒論 2 1.1 研究背景 2 1.2 研究動機 4 1.2.1 鑑取研究設計之概念與應用 5 1.2.2 不同鑑取模式所遭遇之統計問題 6 1.3 研究目的 8 第二章 文獻回顧 9 2.1 雙胞對完全隨機設計之相關測度─組內相關係數測度 9 2.2 雙胞對完全隨機設計之相關測度─勝算比相關測度 12 2.3 雙胞對完全隨機設計之相關測度─相符度相關測度 14 第三章 統計方法 18 3.1 鑑取雙胞對二元性狀資料的相關訊息─ρ與θ之關聯 19 3.2 鑑取雙胞對二元性狀相關分析 22 3.2.1 雙胞對完全鑑取設計之檢定統計量 22 3.2.2 雙胞對有相等鑑取之不完全鑑取設計之檢定統計量 29 3.2.3 雙胞對不完全鑑取設計之檢定統計量 35 3.3 鑑取雙胞對二元性狀資料之所需樣本數計算 44 3.3.1 雙胞對完全鑑取設計之非中心化參數 45 3.3.2 雙胞對有相等鑑取之不完全鑑取設計之非中心化參數 49 3.3.3 雙胞對不完全鑑取設計之非中心化參數 55 第四章 模擬研究 60 4.1 參數設定與資料生成 60 4.2 評估不同鑑取設計下檢定統計量型一錯誤率和檢定力 62 4.3 評估不完全鑑取設計檢定統計量之型一錯誤率和檢定力 63 4.4 檢定統計量之所需樣本數 65 第五章 討論與建議 66 參考文獻 68 附錄I. 完全鑑取設計下最大概似估計量及訊息矩陣推導 72 附錄II. 有相等鑑取之不完全鑑取設計下最大概似估計量及訊息矩陣推導 75 附錄III. 不完全鑑取設計下最大概似估計量及訊息矩陣推導 79 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 以概似函數為基礎之鑑取雙胞對二元性狀資料相符度分析 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Likelihood-Based Concordance Analysis of Ascertained Dichotomous Twin Pair Data | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 99-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 博士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 黃崑明(Jason Kunming Huang),張淑惠(Shu Hui Chang),陳秀熙(Tony Hsiuhsi Chen),沈葆聖(Pao Sheng Shen),陳為堅(Wei Jen Chen) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 二元資料,病體狀態相符度,鑑取設計,截切資料,概似函數之檢定統計量,所需樣本數目, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Bivariate binary data,casewise concordance rate,ascertainment design,truncated data,likelihood-based tests,required sample sizes, | en |
dc.relation.page | 96 | |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2011-02-09 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 公共衛生學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 流行病學與預防醫學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 流行病學與預防醫學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-100-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 706.51 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。