請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/2340
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 曾美惠 | |
dc.contributor.author | Chia-yu Chang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 張家妤 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-13T06:39:17Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-09-14 | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-13T06:39:17Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2017-09-14 | |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2017-08-15 | |
dc.identifier.citation | References
一、中文部分 1. 王琤、李佳謀、張瓊芳、簡淑慧、陳美燕 (2015)。The Development and Psychometric Testing of the Geriatric Health Promotion Scale[老人健康促進量表建構與發展]。The Journal of Nursing Research, 23(1), 56-64。 2. 江正發、周財勝 (2006)。老年人休閒活動型態之分析。大專體育(87),133-137。 3. 吳秀汝、林金定、張必正、陳麗美(2012)。臺北縣三重市獨居老人參與休閒活動之調查研究。臺灣老人保健學, 8(1), 29-50。 4. 李月萍、陳清惠(2010)。社區老人休閒活動研究現況。護理雜誌,57(1),82-88。 5. 李佳綺、胡淑貞、李中一(2015)。臺灣活躍老化政策的現狀與未來發展。長期照護雜誌,19(2),117-126。 6. 李素箱、林志偉、李文裕、傅善恆(2013)。臺中市中老年人休閒參與、自我價值與幸福感之研究。臺灣老人保健學刊, 9(2),126-143。 7. 李維靈、施建彬、邱翔蘭(2007)。退休老人休閒活動參與及其幸福感之相關研究。人文暨社會科學期刊,3(2),27-35。 8. 李錦東、張峻嘉(2009)。台中縣外埔鄉老農休閒偏好與休閒阻礙。鄉村旅遊研究,3(2),65-85。 9. 尚憶薇(2000)。推廣臺灣老年休閒活動─以YMCA的老年人休閒活動設計為借鏡。中華體育季刊,14(1), 77-83。 10. 尚憶薇(2001)。花蓮地區老年人休閒動機與休閒阻礙之研究。體育學報, 31,183-192。 11. 林佳蓉(2000)。老人的休閒參與對休閒滿意和生活滿意之影響。大專體育, 51,156-162。 12. 林嬪嬙(2014)。國民健康署「友善高齡-活躍老化」。醫療品質雜誌,8(3),44-47。 13. 林聰哲、李世昌(2008)。南投縣老年人休閒參與、休閒利益與休閒滿意度之研究。運動休閒管理學報,5(1),35-56。 14. 柳立偉、王嘉淳(2009)。台灣兩大都市公立安養中心老人休閒參與、休閒動機與生活滿意度之研究。休閒產業管理學刊,2(2),22-47。 15. 張成秀、盧希鵬、羅天一、楊培珊(2015)。「活力老化」:2000-2014 ssci期刊文獻之檢閱。臺大社會工作學刊, 32,177-224。 16. 張俊一、許建民(2012)。原住民老年人的休閒參與及休閒阻礙。體育學報, 45(3),247-260。 17. 張家銘(2009)。嘉義市老年人休閒運動參與程度、心流體驗、生活滿意、憂鬱程度之相關研究。體育學報,42(3),113-129。 18. 張靜惠(2008)。休閒運動對中老年人健康促進之效益。臺中教育大學體育學系系刊,3,89-93。 19. 莊智鈞(2005)。台北都會區老年人健康知識與其休閒活動參與情形之關係研究。國立臺灣師範大學社會教育學系碩士論文,台北。 20. 陳俊宏、陳鎰明(2008)。雲林縣獨居老人休閒活動參與現況之研究。台灣生態休閒產業管理學會,2,110-120。 21. 陳祥慈(2012)。老年人參與休閒活動對休閒活動參與效益、生活品質與幸福感之影響探討─以臺中縣長青學苑為例。朝陽科技大學休閒事業管理系碩士論文,台北。 22. 陳肇堯(2015)。年長者休閒活動類型選擇影響因素之研究:以臺南地區為例。體育學報,48(3),345-364。 23. 陳慶餘(2015)。臺灣年老衰弱症的研究與應用。長期照護雜誌,19(2),137-148。 24. 曾智檉(2012)。老年人參與休閒活動現況之探討。休閒保健期刊(7),111-119。 25. 湯幸芬、楊明青、黃詩閔(2010)。「老年休閒」:繪畫題材、休閒生活型態、動機與效益。旅遊健康學刊,9(1),25-40。 26. 黃品齊、方佩欣、張少熙(2014)。活躍老化:高齡者運動促進政策與實施狀況分析。休閒與社會研究,9,105-116。 27. 黃淑貞(2011)。高雄市大樹區老人休閒參與其對生活滿意度調查。休閒保健期刊,6,13-21。 28. 趙美玲、江東亮、白豐銘(2011)。臺灣老人休閒運動之型態及相關因素。旅遊健康學刊,10(1),81-95。 29. 鄭政宗、賴昆宏(2007)。台中地區長青學苑老人之社會支持、孤寂感、休閒活動參與及生命意義之研究。朝陽學報,12,217-254。 30. 盧俊吉、蕭崑杉、林如森、王春熙(2011)。高齡者社會支持、休閒活動與心理健康關係之研究。農業推廣文彙,56,99-108。 31. 行政院國家發展委員會(2014)。中華民國人口推計(103至150年)。Available from: www.ndc.gov.tw/dn.aspx?uid=38321 32. 莊婷婷(2013)。台灣地區老年人參與休閒活動狀況與影響因素之探討。國立台灣師範大學社會工作學研究所碩士論文,台北。 33. 內政部(2016)。104年簡易生命表。 34. 國家發展委員會(2016)。中華民國人口推估(105-150年)報告書。 35. 李素箱、林志偉、李文裕、傅善恆(2013)。台中市中老年人休閒參與、自我價值與幸福感之研究。台灣老人保健學刊,126-143。 36. 何麗芳(1992)。台北市老人休閒活動與生活滿意度研究。東吳大學社會工作研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。 37. 張家妤、曾美惠(2015年12月)。老年人休閒活動參與與評量工具之文獻回顧。臺灣職能治療學會第34次學術研討會暨第1屆國際研討會,台北。 二、英文部分 1. Adams, K. B., Leibbrandt, S., & Moon, H. (2011). A critical review of the literature on social and leisure activity and wellbeing in later life. Ageing and Society, 31(4), 683-712. 2. Agahi, N., Ahacic, K., & Parker, M. G. (2006). Continuity of Leisure Participation From Middle Age to Old Age. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 61(6), S340-S346. 3. Agahi, N., & Parker, M. G. (2005). Are today's older people more active than their predecessors? Participation in leisure-time activities in Sweden in 1992 and 2002. Ageing and Society, 25(6), 925-941. 4. Agahi, N., & Parker, M. G. (2008). Leisure activities and mortality: does gender matter? Journal of Aging and Health, 20(7), 855-871. 5. Chan, M. F., Chan, E. A., Mok, E., & Kwan Tse, F. Y. (2009). Effect of music on depression levels and physiological responses in community-based older adults. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 18(4), 285-294. 6. Chao, S. F. (2014). Changes in Leisure Activities and Dimensions of Depressive Symptoms in Later Life: A 12-Year Follow-Up. Gerontologist. 7. Chen, S.-Y., & Fu, Y.-C. (2008). Leisure Participation and Enjoyment Among the Elderly: Individual Characteristics and Sociability. Educational Gerontology, 34(10), 871-889. 8. Chiao, C., Weng, L.-J., & Botticello, A. L. (2011). Social participation reduces depressive symptoms among older adults: An 18-year longitudinal analysis in Taiwan. BMC Public Health, 11(1), 292. 9. Crowe, M., Andel, R., Pedersen, N. L., Johansson, B., & Gatz, M. (2003). Does participation in leisure activities lead to reduced risk of Alzheimer's disease? A prospective study of Swedish twins. The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 58(5), P249-255. 10. Dumazedier, R.( 1974) .Sociology of Leisure. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Gist, N.P.& Fava, S.F.(1964).Urban society. NY : Crowel1. 11. Diggs, J. (2008). Activity Theory of Aging. In S. J. D. Loue & M. Sajatovic (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Aging and Public Health (pp. 79-81). Boston, MA: Springer US. 12. Ellwardt, L., Aartsen, M., Deeg, D., & Steverink, N. (2013). Does loneliness mediate the relation between social support and cognitive functioning in later life? Social Science & Medicine, 98, 116-124. 13. Eriksson Sörman, D., Sundström, A., Rönnlund, M., Adolfsson, R., & Nilsson, L.-G. (2014). Leisure Activity in Old Age and Risk of Dementia: A 15-Year Prospective Study. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 69(4), 493-501. 14. Fallahpour, M., Borell, L., Luborsky, M., & Nygård, L. (2015). Leisure-activity participation to prevent later-life cognitive decline: a systematic review. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 1-36. 15. Ferrer, A., Formiga, F., Cunillera, O., Megido, M. J., Corbella, X., & Almeda, J. (2015). Predicting factors of health-related quality of life in octogenarians: a 3-year follow-up longitudinal study. Quality of Life Research, 24(11), 2701-2711. 16. Friedland, R. P., Fritsch, T., Smyth, K. A., Koss, E., Lerner, A. J., Chen, C. H., Petot, G. J. and Debanne, S. M. (2001). Patients with Alzheimer's disease have reduced activities in midlife compared with healthy control-group members. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98(6), 3440-3445. 17. García-Martín, M. Á., Gómez-Jacinto, L., & Martimportugués-Goyenechea, C. (2004). A Structural Model of the Effects of Organized Leisure Activities on the Well-Being of Elder Adults in Spain. Activities, Adaptation & Aging, 28(3), 19-34. 18. Glei, D. A., Landau, D. A., Goldman, N., Chuang, Y.-L., Rodríguez, G., & Weinstein, M. (2005). Participating in social activities helps preserve cognitive function: an analysis of a longitudinal, population-based study of the elderly. International Journal of Epidemiology, 34(4), 864-871. 19. Godbey, G. C., Caldwell, L. L., Floyd, M., & Payne, L. L. (2005). Contributions of leisure studies and recreation and park management research to the active living agenda. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 28(2 Suppl 2), 150-158. 20. Hajek, A., Brettschneider, C., Lange, C., Posselt, T., Wiese, B., Steinmann, S., . . . Konig, H. H. (2015). Gender differences in the effect of social support on health-related quality of life: results of a population-based prospective cohort study in old age in Germany. Quality of Life Research. 21. Herrera, A. P., Meeks, T. W., Dawes, S. E., Hernandez, D. M., Thompson, W. K., Sommerfeld, D. H., . . . Jeste, D. V. (2011). Emotional and cognitive health correlates of leisure activities in older Latino and Caucasian women. Psychology, Health and Medicine, 16(6), 661-674. 22. Holwerda, T. J., Beekman, A. T., Deeg, D. J., Stek, M. L., van Tilburg, T. G., Visser, P. J., Schmand, B., Jonker, C. and Schoevers, R. A. (2012). Increased risk of mortality associated with social isolation in older men: only when feeling lonely? Results from the Amsterdam Study of the Elderly (AMSTEL). Psychological Medicine, 42(4), 843-853. 23. Hyyppa, M. T., Maki, J., Impivaara, O., & Aromaa, A. (2006). Leisure participation predicts survival: a population-based study in Finland. Health Promotion International, 21(1), 5-12. 24. Iwasa, H., Yoshida, Y., Kai, I., Suzuki, T., Kim, H., & Yoshida, H. (2012). Leisure activities and cognitive function in elderly community-dwelling individuals in Japan: A 5-year prospective cohort study. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 72(2), 159-164. 25. Karp, A., Paillard-Borg, S., Wang, H. X., Silverstein, M., Winblad, B., & Fratiglioni, L. (2006). Mental, physical and social components in leisure activities equally contribute to decrease dementia risk. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, 21(2), 65-73. 26. Kielhofner G. (2008) Model of Human Occupation: Theory and Application. Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. 27. Kelly, J. R. (2012). Leisure. (Fourth edition). 28. Lee, J. H., Lee, J. H., & Park, S. H. (2014). Leisure activity participation as predictor of quality of life in Korean urban-dwelling elderly. Occupational Therapy International, 21(3), 124-132. 29. Lennartsson, C., & Silverstein, M. (2001). Does engagement with life enhance survival of elderly people in Sweden? The role of social and leisure activities. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 56(6), S335-342. 30. Liu, H., Yeh, C.-K., Chick, G. E., & Zinn, H. C. (2008). An Exploration of Meanings of Leisure: A Chinese Perspective. Leisure Sciences, 30(5), 482-488. 31. Longino, J. C. F., & Kart, C. S. (1982). Explicating Activity Theory: A Formal Replication1. Journal of Gerontology, 37(6), 713-722. 32. Maselko, J., Sebranek, M., Mun, M. H., Perera, B., Ahs, J., & Ostbye, T. (2014). Contribution of generative leisure activities to cognitive function in elderly Sri Lankan adults. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 62(9), 1707-1713. 33. Mendoza-Ruvalcaba, N. M., & Arias-Merino, E. D. (2015). 'I am active': effects of a program to promote active aging. Journal of Clinical Interventions in Aging, 10, 829-837. 34. Menec, V. H. (2003). The relation between everyday activities and successful aging: a 6-year longitudinal study. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 58(2), S74-82. 35. Minhat, H. S., & Mohd Amin, R. (2012). Sociodemographic determinants of leisure participation among elderly in Malaysia. Journal of Community Health, 37(4), 840-847. 36. Morrow-Howell, N., Putnam, M., Lee, Y. S., Greenfield, J. C., Inoue, M., & Chen, H. (2014). An investigation of activity profiles of older adults. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 69(5), 809-821. 37. Neulinger, J. A., & Breit, H. C. (1969) Attitude dimensions of leisure. Journal of Leisure Research, I,255-261. 38. Nilsson, I., & Fisher, A. G. (2006). Evaluating leisure activities in the oldest old. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 13(1), 31-37. 39. Nilsson, I., Nyqvist, F., Gustafson, Y., & Nygard, M. (2015). Leisure Engagement: Medical Conditions, Mobility Difficulties, and Activity Limitations-A Later Life Perspective. Journal of Aging Research, 2015, 610154. 40. Nimrod, G. (2007). Expanding, Reducing, Concentrating and Diffusing: Post Retirement Leisure Behavior and Life Satisfaction. Leisure Sciences, 29(1), 91-111. 41. Nummela, O., Sulander, T., Rahkonen, O., & Uutela, A. (2008). Associations of self-rated health with different forms of leisure activities among ageing people. International Journal of Public Health, 53(5), 227-235. 42. Patricia M. Simone, A. L. H. (2013). Frailty, Leisure Activity and Functional Status in Older Adults: Relationship With Subjective Well Being. Clinical Gerontologist, 36, 275-293. 43. Pfeiffer, P. N., Heisler, M., Piette, J. D., Rogers, M. A., & Valenstein, M. (2011). Efficacy of peer support interventions for depression: a meta-analysis. General Hospital Psychiatry, 33(1), 29-36. 44. Pressman, S. D., Matthews, K. A., Cohen, S., Martire, L. M., Scheier, M., Baum, A., & Schulz, R. (2009). Association of enjoyable leisure activities with psychological and physical well-being. Psychosomatic Medicine, 71(7), 725-732. 45. Rowe, J. R., & Kahn, R. L. (1998). Successful aging. New York: Pantheon Books. 46. Rodríguez, A., Látková, P., & Sun, Y.-Y. (2007). The relationship between leisure and life satisfaction: application of activity and need theory. Social Indicators Research, 86(1), 163. 47. Scarmeas, N., Levy, G., Tang, M. X., Manly, J., & Stern, Y. (2001). Influence of leisure activity on the incidence of Alzheimer's disease. Neurology, 57(12), 2236-2242. 48. Schooler, C., & Mulatu, M. S. (2001). The reciprocal effects of leisure time activities and intellectual functioning in older people: A longitudinal analysis. Psychology and Aging, 16(3), 466-482. 49. Singh, M. A. F. (2002). Exercise Comes of Age: Rationale and Recommendations for a Geriatric Exercise Prescription. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 57(5), M262-M282. 50. Steinkamp, M. W., & Kelly, J. R. (1987). Social Integration, Leisure Activity, and Life Satisfaction in Older Adults: Activity Theory Revisited. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 25(4), 293-307. 51. Strain, L. A., Grabusic, C. C., Searle, M. S., & Dunn, N. J. (2002). Continuing and ceasing leisure activities in later life: a longitudinal study. Gerontologist, 42(2), 217-223. 52. Takeda, F., Noguchi, H., Monma, T., & Tamiya, N. (2015). How Possibly Do Leisure and Social Activities Impact Mental Health of Middle-Aged Adults in Japan?: An Evidence from a National Longitudinal Survey. PLoS ONE, 10(10), e0139777. 53. Teo, A. R., Choi, H., & Valenstein, M. (2013). Social relationships and depression: ten-year follow-up from a nationally representative study. PLoS ONE, 8(4), e62396. 54. Toepoel, V. (2013). Ageing, Leisure, and Social Connectedness: How could Leisure Help Reduce Social Isolation of Older People? Social Indicators Research, 113(1), 355-372. 55. van der Meer, M. J. (2008). The sociospatial diversity in the leisure activities of older people in the Netherlands. Journal of Aging Studies, 22(1), 1-12. 56. Verghese, J., LeValley, A., Derby, C., Kuslansky, G., Katz, M., Hall, C., . . . Lipton, R. B. (2006). Leisure Activities And The Risk of Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment In The Elderly. Neurology, 66(6), 821-827. 57. Verghese, J., Lipton, R. B., Katz, M. J., Hall, C. B., Derby, C. A., Kuslansky, G., Buschke, H. (2003). Leisure activities and the risk of dementia in the elderly. The New England Journal of Medicine, 348(25), 2508-2516. 58. World Health Organization. (2002). Active aging—A policy framework. Retrieved from http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/67215/1/WHO_NMH_NPH_02.8.Pdf 59. World Health Organization. (2002). Towards a Common Language for Functioning, Disability and Health ICF. Geneva: WHO. 60. World Health Organization: International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF).Geneva, Switzerland, World Health Organization, 2001. 61. World Health Organization. (1986). Ottawa charter for health promotion. Health Promotion International, 1(4). 62. Wang, H. X., Karp, A., Winblad, B., & Fratiglioni, L. (2002). Late-life engagement in social and leisure activities is associated with a decreased risk of dementia: a longitudinal study from the Kungsholmen project. American Journal of Epidemiology, 155(12), 1081-1087. 63. Zunzunegui Mí, V., Alvarado, B. E., Del Ser, T., & Otero, A. (2003). Social Networks, Social Integration, and Social Engagement Determine Cognitive Decline in Community-Dwelling Spanish Older Adults. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 58(2), S93-s100. 64. Nicky J. Newton, Jana Pladevall-Guyer, Richard Gonzalez, Jacqui Smith (2016). Activity Engagement and Activity-Related Experiences: The Role of Personality. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences. 65. Zickuhr, K., & Madden, M. (2012). Older adults and internet use. Pew Internet & American Life Project, 6. 66. Moran, M., Van Cauwenberg, J., Hercky-Linnewiel, R., Cerin, E., Deforche, B., & Plaut, P. (2014). Understanding the relationships between the physical environment and physical activity in older adults: a systematic review of qualitative studies. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 11(1), 79. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/2340 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 背景:
現今全球老化問題隨著醫學及科技進步而逐漸增加。面臨人口老化持續加快,如何維持一個人老化歷程中健康與安適是十分重要的。過去研究顯示出參與休閒活動對於老年人具有多種益處,包括生理及心理之安適感。過去文獻中,針對老年族群所使用之休閒活動參與量表探討的面向多為「參與頻率」。然而,迄今仍無研究將多樣性、頻率、和誰一起、地點、喜好程度等環境及個人因素一併考量於同一份量表中,以便對於老年族群參與休閒活動之情形有更完整之了解。 目的: 本研究目的為二:(1)發展一老年人休閒活動參與量表,除了考量休閒活動之種類、頻率,也將納入參與活動之陪同者、地點以及個人喜好等,(2)以此發展之老人休閒活動參與量表,探討老年人休閒活動參與之情形。 方法: 此研究分為兩階段。此兩階段之收案條件皆為:(1)年滿60歲以上且(2)可以中文或台語溝通者。排除條件為患有嚴重腦傷、失智症及其他認知相關疾病者。第一階段透過五個步驟:文獻回顧、初步量表項目發展、專家效度、量表測試及信度分析,發展為老年休閒活動參與量表(Leisure Participation Questionnaire)。第一階段完成後,由研究者至位於台北之社區單位向個案說明研究內容並協助其填寫研究量表。第二階段為探討老年人之休閒活動參與情形,分析全體研究個案參與休閒活動之種類、頻率、陪同者、地點、喜好及重要程度。 結果: 本研究共納入149位個案,其中30位於四周後進行第二次施測。第一階段研究所發展之「老人休閒活動參與量表」共包含31項休閒活動及六個面向:多樣性(Diversity)、頻率(Frequency)、與誰一起(With whom)、地點(Where)、喜好(Preference)及重要程度(Value)。研究結果顯示此量表具有良好信度,其內部一致性分析以其中三個面向: 頻率(Frequency)、喜好(Preference)及重要程度(Value)呈現,Cronbach’s alpha分別為.792、 .794及.799皆屬高信度。再測信度分析結果顯示六個面向中,多樣性(ρ =.619)、強度(r =.718)、與誰一起(ρ =.717)及地點(ρ =.660)皆達中至高信度,而喜好(r =.370)及重要程度(r =.387)屬於較主觀之面向,因而其再測信度較低。第二階段之研究結果顯示個案之平均年齡為70.7歲(SD=6.35),83.9%為女性,60%為接受九年以上教育者,55%屬於衰弱長者。於全體個案中,參與比例最高的兩個活動為「聊天(99%)」及「與家人、朋友聚會(99%)」,而比例最低的為「游泳(8.1%)」。參與休閒活動之「與誰一起」面向比例最高為「自己(39.2%)」,「地點」中比例最高為「在家(36.76%)」。老年人參與休閒活動之「喜好」及「重要程度」則皆介於「喜歡」和「很喜歡」。另外,將個案依據年齡、教育程度及衰弱程度區分為各兩組,研究結果顯示年齡較低及教育程度較高者參與休閒活動多樣性及強度較高,達顯著差異。 結論: 本研究顯示此由上述六個活動參與面向及四個活動類型所組成之老人休閒活動參與量表為一可信之工具。未來研究及臨床應用可藉由此量表,考量多種參與面向及休閒活動項目,以全面地了解老年人參與休閒活動之情形。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Background: With advances in medicine and technology, the increase of aging population is taking place worldwide. Confronted with such rapid growing aging population, maintaining one’s health and well-being throughout late life is of great urgency. A multitude of studies have revealed the benefits of participating in leisure activities for older adults’ mental and physical well-being. Through literature review of measures of leisure participation among older adults, the most often measured dimension of participation is frequency. However, to date, no research has considered diversity, frequency, with whom, where, preference and value altogether, for a comprehensive profile of the leisure participation among older adults.
Objectives: The purpose of this study was two-fold: (1) to develop a leisure participation questionnaire in order to have a comprehensive profile of older adults’ leisure participation, considering not only frequency and types of activities, but also who they do leisure activities with, at what location, and their preference altogether, and (2)to investigate the profile of leisure participation among community-dwelling older adults. Methods: This research was conducted in two phases. The inclusion criteria of participants of both research phases were (1) older adults aged more than 60 years and (2) being capable of communicating in Mandarin Chinese or Taiwanese Hokkien. Those with severe brain injury, dementia, and other cognitive-related diseases will be excluded. In phase I, the questionnaire was developed through five steps: literature review, preliminary item development, expert validation, pilot testing and reliability of the questionnaire. After the Leisure Participation Questionnaire was developed, researcher recruited participants from different community sites in Taipei and assisted them to fill out the questionnaire one-to-one. The data were then analyzed in phase II to investigate older adults’ leisure participation profile. Results: 149 older adults were recruited in this research and the second administration was conducted after a four-week interval on 30 participants. The Leisure Participation Questionnaire developed in phase I has 31 leisure activities and six dimensions: Diversity, Frequency, With whom, Where, Preference and Value. The internal consistencies of the Frequency, Preference and Value dimensions were .792, .794, and .799 respectively. The results of test-retest reliability of the Diversity, Frequency, With whom and Where dimension showed moderate to high reliability, while the dimensions of Preference and Value showed lower reliability. The results of phase II showed that among all participants, “chatting (99%)” and “getting together with family and friends (99%)” have the highest participation rate, while the lowest was “swimming (8.1%)”. As to the dimension of With whom, the rating “on one’s own (39.2%)” was the highest, and the rating “at home (36.8%)” was the highest in the dimension of Where. The ratings of the dimension Preference and Value were both between “pretty much” and “very much”. In addition, the results of the t-tests showed that significantly higher diversity and frequency among older adults who were younger and with higher education level. Conclusion: The Leisure Participation Questionnaire, which includes six dimensions, has good reliability. By using this questionnaire, future research and health professionals can have a comprehensive profile of older adults’ leisure participation. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-13T06:39:17Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-106-R04429002-1.pdf: 2459432 bytes, checksum: 66687c86e333b25a00ce59f4a15c20d3 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝 i
摘要 ii Abstract iv Table of contents vi List of tables ix List of figures xi Chapter 1. Introduction 1 Chapter 2. Definition of terms 6 2.1. Leisure activity 6 2.2. Leisure participation 7 2.3. Older adults 7 Chapter 3. Literature review 8 3.1. The increase in elderly population and underlying health related issues in older adults 8 3.2. Role of activity participation in aging 9 3.3. Benefits of leisure participation to older adults 11 3.4. Leisure participation of older adults 13 3.5. Measures of leisure participation for older adults 15 Chapter 4. Phase I: Development of Leisure Participation Questionnaire 21 4.1. Methods 22 4.2. Results 28 Chapter 5. Phase II: Leisure participation profile of older adults 31 5.1. Participants 31 5.2. Measures 32 5.3. Procedure 32 5.4. Data analysis 33 5.5. Results 33 Chapter 6. Discussion 43 6.1. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the LPQ 44 6.2. Leisure participation profile of older adults 45 6.3. Limitations of the research 51 Chapter 7. Conclusion and suggestions of the research 52 7.1. Conclusion 52 7.2. Suggestions for future research 53 7.3. Suggestions for clinical application 54 References 55 Appendix 1: Dimensions of leisure participation measured in literatures 82 Appendix 2:Activity items of the LPQ 90 Appendix 3: Dimensions of the Leisure Participation Questionnaire 91 Appendix 4:老人休閒活動參與量表(Leisure Participation Questionnaire) 92 Appendix 5:加拿大臨床衰弱量表中文面訪版(Canadian study of health and aging clinical frailty scale (CSHA-CFS) Chinese in-person interview version) 109 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 老人休閒活動參與量表之發展 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Development of Leisure Participation Questionnaire | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 105-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳慶餘,毛慧芬,張鳳航 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 老年人,休閒活動,休閒活動參與量表, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Older adults,leisure activities,leisure participation questionnaire, | en |
dc.relation.page | 109 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201703238 | |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
dc.date.accepted | 2017-08-15 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 醫學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 職能治療研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 職能治療學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-106-1.pdf | 2.4 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。