請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/23201
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 曹承礎(Seng-Cho T. Chou) | |
dc.contributor.author | Ying-Hsun Hung | en |
dc.contributor.author | 洪英訓 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T04:47:09Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2009-07-31 | |
dc.date.issued | 2009 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2009-07-30 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Reference
• Qiu, Y.J., http://www.moeasmea.gov.tw/, Promoting Sharing of Application Experience of Knowledge Management among Small and Medium Enterprises KM processes and KM Capabilities • Nonaka, I. 'The Knowledge-Creating Company,' in: Harvard Business Review, Harvard Business School Publication Corp., 1991, pp. 96-104. • Nonaka, I. 'A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation,' Organization Science (5:1) 1994, pp 14-37. • Carlile, P.R., and Rebentisch, E.S. 'Into the Black Box: The Knowledge Transformation Cycle,' Management Science (49:9) 2003, pp 1180-1195. • Revilla, E., Sarkis, J., and Acosta, J. 'Towards a knowledge management and learning taxonomy for research joint ventures,' Technovation (25:11) 2005, pp 1307-1316. • Raghu, T.S., and Vinze, A. 'A business process context for Knowledge Management,' Decision Support Systems (43:3) 2007, pp 1062-1079. • King, W.R., Chung, T.R., and Haney, M.H. 'Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning,' Omega (36:2) 2008, pp 167-172. • Hwang, H.-G., Chang, I.C., Chen, F.-J., and Wu, S.-Y. 'Investigation of the application of KMS for diseases classifications: A study in a Taiwanese hospital,' Expert Systems with Applications (34:1) 2008, pp 725-733. • Fan, Z.-P., Feng, B., Sun, Y.-H., and Ou, W. 'Evaluating knowledge management capability of organizations: a fuzzy linguistic method,' Expert Systems with Applications (36:2, Part 2) 2009, pp 3346-3354. • Lichtenthaler, U. 'Leveraging technology assets in the presence of markets for knowledge,' European Management Journal (26:2) 2008, pp 122-134. • Lee, J.-H., and Kim, Y.-G. 'A stage model of organizational knowledge management: a latent content analysis,' Expert Systems with Applications (20:4) 2001, pp 299-311. • Kodama, M. 'Innovation and knowledge creation through leadership-based strategic community: Case study on high-tech company in Japan,' Technovation (27:3) 2007, pp 115-132. • Chuang, S.-H. 'A resource-based perspective on knowledge management capability and competitive advantage: an empirical investigation,' Expert Systems with Applications (27:3) 2004, pp 459-465 CMMI • Mike Phillips, CMMI V1.1 and Appraisal Tutorial, Carnegie Mellon University, software engineering institute, Pittsburgh, PA 15213-3890, 2004 • Sun-Jen Huang, Wen-Ming Han, Selection priority of process areas based on CMMI continuous representation, Information & Management 43 (2006) 297–307 • Lin, C., and Tseng, S.-M. 'Bridging the implementation gaps in the knowledge management system for enhancing corporate performance,' Expert Systems with Applications (29:1) 2005, pp 163-173. • McBriar, I., Smith, C., Bain, G., Unsworth, P., Magraw, S., and Gordon, J.L. 'Risk, gap and strength: key concepts in knowledge management,' Knowledge-Based Systems (16:1) 2003, pp 29-36. Delphi method • Norman, D., and Olaf, H. 'AN EXPERIMENTAL APPLICATION OF THE DELPHI METHOD TO THE USE OF EXPERTS,' Management Science (pre-1986) (9:3) 1963, p 458. • Jolson, M.A., and et al. 'THE DELPHI PROCESS IN MARKETING DECISION-MAKING,' JMR, Journal of Marketing Research (8:4) 1971, p 443. • Jones, J., Hunter, D., 1995. Qualitative research: consensus methods for medical and health services research. British Medical Journal 311, 376–380. • Linstone, H.A., Turoff, M., 1975. The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications. Addison-Wesley, London. • Robert, S. Duboff (2007). 'The Wisdom of (Expert) Crowds.' Harvard Business Review 85(9): 28. OKMR • Taylor, W.A., Wright, G.H., “Organizational Readiness for Successful Knowledge Sharing: Challenges for Public Sector Managers,” Information resources management journal,(17,2), Apr-June, 2004, pp.22-37 • Siemieniuch, C. E., and Sinclair, M. A., “A framework for organizational readiness for knowledge management,” International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Bradford, (24, 1/2), 2004, pp. 79-98 • Wu, J.-H., and Wang, Y.-M. “Measuring KMS success: A respecification of the DeLone and McLean's model,” Information & Management (43:6), 2006, pp 728-739. • Anderson, J., Gerbing, J. “Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach,” Psychological Bulletin (103:3), 1988, pp. 411–423 • Parasuraman, A., “Technology Readiness Index (TRI): A Multiple-Item Scale to Measure Readiness to Embrace New Technologies,” Journal of Service Research, (2:4), May, 2000, pp.307-320. • Lin, C., Yen, D.C., and Tarn, D.D.C. “An industry-level knowledge management model--a study of information-related industry in Taiwan,” Information & Management (44:1) 2007, pp 22-39. • Kulkarni, U.R., Ravindran, S., and Freeze, R. 'A Knowledge Management Success Model: Theoretical Development and Empirical Validation,' Journal of Management Information Systems (23:3), 12 2006, pp 309-347. • Poston, R.S., and Speier, C. 'EFFECTIVE USE OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS: A PROCESS MODEL OF CONTENT RATINGS AND CREDIBILITY INDICATORS,' MIS Quarterly (29:2), 06 2005, pp 221-244. • Taylor, W.A., and Wright, G.H. “Organizational Readiness for Successful Knowledge Sharing: Challenges for Public Sector Managers,” Information Resources Management Journal (17,2) , 2004, pp. 22-37 • Gold, A.H., Malhotra, A., and Segars, A.H. 'Knowledge Management: An Organizational Capabilities Perspective,' Journal of Management Information Systems (18:1), Summer 2001, pp 185-214. • Alavi, M., Kayworth, T.R., and Leidner, D.E. 'An Empirical Examination of the Influence of Organizational Culture on Knowledge Management Practices,' Journal of Management Information Systems (22:3), 12 2005, pp 191-224. • Alavi, M., and Leidner, D.E. “Review: Knlowledge Management and Knolwedge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues,” MIS Quarterly (25:1), 2001,pp. 107-136. • Wiig, K., “Knowledge Management Foundations,” Arlington: Schema Press, 1993. • Davenport, T. H., and Prusak, L. Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1998. • Chang, C.-J. J., and King, W.R. 'Measuring the Performance of Information Systems: A Functional Scorecard,' Journal of Management Information Systems (22:1), Summer 2005, pp 85-115. • Heeseok, L., and Byounggu, C. 'Knowledge Management Enablers, Processes, and Organizational Performance: An Integrative View and Empirical Examination,' Journal of Management Information Systems (20:1), Summer 2003, pp 179-228. • Zahra, S.A., and George, G. 'The Net-Enabled Business Innovation Cycle and the Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities,' Information Systems Research (13:2), 06 2002, pp 147-150. • Wheeler, B.C. 'NEBIC: A Dynamic Capabilities Theory for Assessing Net-Enablement,' Information Systems Research (13:2), 06 2002, pp 125-146. • Anderson, J.C. “An approach for confirmatory measurement and structural equation modeling of organizational properties,” Management Science(33: 4), April 1987, pp.525–541. • Anderson, J.C., and Gerging, D.W. “Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach.” Psychological Bulletin (103:3) May 1988, pp. 411–423. • Klenke, K. “Construct Measurement in Management Information Systems: A Review and Critique of User Satisfaction and User Involvement Instruments,” INFOR (30:4), 1992, pp. 325-348. • Doll, W.J., and Torkzadeh, G. “The Measurement of End-User Computing Satisfaction,” MIS Quarterly (12:2), 1988, pp. 259-274. • Churchill, G.A. “A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs,” Journal of Marketing Review (16:1), 1979, pp. 64-73. MCDM • Alavi, M., and Leidner, D.E. “Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues,” MIS Quarterly (25:1), 2001, pp. 107-136. • Bellman, R. E., and Zadeh, L. A., “Decision-making in a fuzzy environment,” Management Science (17), 1970, pp. 141-164. • Belton, V., “The Importance of Integration,” Georg Cantor Award Presentation, 2008 MCDM conference, Auckland, New Zealand, January 7-12, 2008, pp. 5 • Chang, C.-J. J., and King, W.R. “Measuring the Performance of Information Systems: A Functional Scorecard,” Journal of Management Information Systems (22:1), Summer 2005, pp 85-115. • Chiu, Y. J., Chen, H. C., Tzeng. G. H., and Shyu, J. Z., “Marketing strategy based on customer behaviour for the LCD-TV,” International Journal of Management and Decision Making (7: 2), 2006, pp. 143-165. • CMMI Product Team. “Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMISM), Version 1.1,” 2002. • Dalkey, N., Helmer, O., “An experimental pplication of the Delphi method to the use of experts,” Management Science (9), 1963, pp.458–467. • Ehms, K., and Langen, M. “Holistic Development of KM with KMMM,” Siemens AG / Corporate Technology Knowledge Management, and Business Transformation, 2002. • Gabus, A., and Fontela, E. “World problems an invitation to further thought within the framework of DEMATEL,” Switzerland Geneva: Battelle Geneva Research Centre, 1972 • Gold, A. H., Malhotra, A., and Segars, A. H. “Knowledge Management: An Organizational Capabilities Perspective,” Journal of Management Information Systems (18: 1), 2001, pp. 185-214. • Hori,S., Shimizu, Y., “Designing methods of human interface for supervisory control systems,” Control Engineering Practice (7), 1999, pp. 1413-1419. • Hung, Y. H., and Chou, S. C., “On Constructing a Knowledge Management Pyramid Model,” The 2005 IEEE International Conference on Information Reuse and Integration . • Jones, J., Hunter, D., “Qualitative research: consensus methods for medical and health services research,” British Medical Journal (311),1995, pp.376–380. • Klimko, G. “Knowledge Management and Maturity Models: Building Common Understanding,” ECKM, 2001, pp. 269-278. • Kochikar. “The Knowledge Management Maturity Model – A Staged Framework for Leveraging Knowledge,” The KM World 2000 conference, Infosys, September 2000. • KPMG. “KPMG's Knowledge Management Survey 2002/2003,” 2003 • LAW, Y. F., and LEE, J. E. “Exploring Knowledge Management Perceptions among Information Systems Managers-Empirical Sense-Making Through Focus Group Research,” Australian Journal of Information Systems, Dec., 2001, pp. 42-55. • Lin,C. L., and Tzeng, G. H. “A value-created system of science (technology) park by using DEMATEL,” Expert Systems with Applications, (36:6), 2009, pp 9683-9697. • Linstone, H.A., Turoff, M., “The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications,” 1975, Addison-Wesley, London. • Nissen, M. E., Kamel, M. N., and Sengupta, K. C. “Toward Integrating Knowledge management, Processes and Systems: A Position Paper,” Naval Postgraduate School, USA ,1999. • O’Dell, C. “A Current Review of Knowledge Management Best Practices,” Business Intelligence, London ,1996. • Opricovic, S. “Multicriteria optimization of civil engineering systems,” Belgrade: Faculty of Civil Engineering, 1998. • Opricovic, S., and Tzeng, G. H. “Multicriteria planning of post-earthquake sustainable reconstruction,” Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, (17:3), 2002, pp 211-220. • Opricovic, S., and Tzeng, G. H. “Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS,” European Journal of Operational Research, 156(2), 2004, pp 445-455. • Opricovic, S., and Tzeng, G. H. “Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods,” European Journal of Operational Research, (178:2), 2007, pp 514-529. • Ou Yang, Y. P., Shieh, H. M., Leu, J. D., and Tzeng, G. H. “A novel hybrid MCDM model combined with DEMATEL and ANP with applications,” International Journal of Operations Research, (5:3), 2008, pp160-168. • Parasuraman, A., “Technology Readiness Index (TRI): A Multiple-Item Scale to Measure Readiness to Embrace New Technologies,” Journal of Service Research, (2:4), May, 2000, pp.307-320. • Robert, S. Duboff. “The Wisdom of (Expert) Crowds,” Harvard Business Review (85,9), 2007,pp 28. • Siemieniuch, C. E., and Sinclair, M. A., “A framework for organizational readiness for knowledge management,” International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Bradford, (24, 1/2), 2004, pp. 79-98 • Skyrme, D. J. “Knowledge Management Solutions-The IT Contribution,” SIGGROUP Bulletin, April, (19:1),1998. • Tamura, H., Akazawa, K. and Nagata, H. “Structural modeling of uneasy factors for creating safe, secure and reliable society,” SICE System Integration Division Annual Conference, 2002, pp. 330-340. • Tanriverdi, H. “Information Technology Relatedness, Knowledge Management Capability, And Performance of Multi-business Firms,” MIS Quarterly (29,2), JUNE 2005, pp.311-334 • Taylor, W.A., Wright, G.H., “Organizational Readiness for Successful Knowledge Sharing: Challenges for Public Sector Managers,” Information resources management journal,(17,2), Apr-June, 2004, pp.22-37 • Tsai, W. H., and Chou, W. C. “Selecting management systems for sustainable development in SMEs: A novel hybrid model based on DEMATEL, ANP, and ZOGP,” Expert Systems with Applications, (36:2), 2009, pp 1444-1458. • Tzeng, G. H., Chiang, C. H., and Li, C. W. “Evaluating intertwined effects in e-learning programs: a novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL,” Expert Systems with Applications, (32:4), 2007, pp 1028-1044. • Wheeler, B.C. “NEBIC: A Dynamic Capabilities Theory for Assessing Net-Enablement,” Information Systems Research (13:2), 06 2002, pp 125-146. • Wiig, K. “Knowledge Management Foundations,” Arlington: Schema Press, 1993. • Wu, W. W. “Choosing knowledge management strategies by using a combined ANP and DEMATEL approach,” Expert Systems with Applications, (35:3), 2008, pp 828-835. • Zahra, S.A., and George, G. “The Net-Enabled Business Innovation Cycle and the Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities,” Information Systems Research (13:2), 06 2002, pp 147-150. KMMM • Alavi, M ., and Leidner, D.E. “Review: Knlowledge Management and Knolwedge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues,” MIS Quarterly (25:1), 2001,pp. 107-136. • APQC. “APQC’s Road Map to Knowledge Management Results: Stages of Implementation”. • Arthur Andersen , and APQC. “The Knowledge Management Assessment Tool, ” Prototype Version, Released at the Knowledge Imperative Symposium, Houston, Texas, September ,1995. • Beckman ,T. “A Methodology for Knowledge Management,” Proceeding of the IASTED International Conference on AI and Soft Computing ,1997. • Benbasat, I.,and Goldstein, D.K. and Mead, M. “The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems,” MIS Quarterly (11: 3), 1987, pp. 369-386. • Brown, J. S. , and Duguid, P. “Organizing Knowledge,” California Management Review (40:3), 1998, pp. 90-111. • CMMI Product Team. “Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMISM), Version 1.1,” 2002. • Davenport, T. H., and Prusak, L. Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1998. • Despres, C., and Chauvel, D. “Knowledge Management(s) ,”Journal of Knowledge Management (3:2),1999, pp. 110-120 • DiBella, A. and Nevis, E. How Organizations Learn, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA,1998 . • Drucker, P.F. Post Capitalist Society , New York, HarperBusiness,1993. • Ehms, K ., and Langen, M. “Holistic Development of KM with KMMM,” Siemens AG / Corporate Technology Knowledge Management , and Business Transformation , 2002. • Gold, A. H., Malhotra, A., and Segars, A. H. “Knowledge Management: An Organizational Capabilities Perspective,” Journal of Management Information Systems (18: 1), 2001, pp. 185-214. • Grover, V., and Davenport, T. H. “General Perspectives on Knowledge Management: Fostering a Research Agenda,” Journal of Management System (18:1), Summer ,2001, pp. 5-21. • Humphrey, W. S., “Characterizing the Software Process: A Maturity Framework,” Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh ,1988. • Holzner, B., and Marx, J. Knowledge application: The knowledge system in society, Boston: Allyn-Bacon, 1979. • Klimko, G. “Knowledge Management and Maturity Models: Building Common Understanding,” ECKM, 2001, pp. 269-278. • Kochikar. “The Knowledge Management Maturity Model – A Staged Framework for Leveraging Knowledge,” The KM World 2000 conference , Infosys, September 2000. • KPMG. “The Knowledge Journey: A Business Guide to Knowledge Systems,”1999. • KPMG. “KM research report ,” 2000. • KPMG. “KPMG's Knowledge Management Survey 2002/2003,” 2003 • LAW, Y. F., and LEE, J. E. “Exploring Knowledge Management Perceptions among Information Systems Managers-Empirical Sense-Making Through Focus Group Research,” Australian Journal of Information Systems, Dec., 2001, pp. 42-55. • Liou, Y. I. “Knowledge Acquisition: Issues, Techniques, and Methodology,” ACM, 1990. • Marquardt, M. Building the Learning Organization , McGraw Hill , 1996. • Myers, M. D. “Qualitative Research in Information Systems,” MIS Quarterly (21:2) ,1997, pp. 241-242. • Nissen, M. E., Kamel, M. N., and Sengupta, K. C. “Toward Integrating Knowledge management, Processes and Systems: A Position Paper,” Naval Postgraduate School, USA ,1999. • O’Dell, C. “A Current Review of Knowledge Management Best Practices,” Business Intelligence, London ,1996. • Orlikowski, W.J., and Baroudi, J.J. “Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions,” Information Systems Research (2) ,1991, pp. 1-28. • Skyrme, D. J. “Knowledge Management Solutions-The IT Contribution,” SIGGROUP Bulletin, April, (19:1),1998. • Song, S.L.“Application of Knowledge Management for Small & Medium Enterprise,” Science and Technology Policy Research and Information Center, National Applied Research Laboratory, 2006, PG9504-0562, 091409310000000024 • Teece, D. “Capturing Value for Knowledge Assets: The New Economy, Markets for Know-how, and Intangible Know-how and Intangible Assets,” California Management Review (40:3), 1998, pp. 55-79. • Wiig ,K. “Knowledge Management Foundations,” Arlington: Schema Press,1993. • Yin, R. K. Case Study Research, Design and Methods, 3rd ed. Newbury Park, Sage Publications, 2002. • http://www.sei.cmu.edu/cmmi/ • http://www.kmmm.org • http://www.qual.auckland.ac.nz/ | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/23201 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 中文摘要
本論文主要是一開始是透過提出一套整體性知識管理成熟度模型,調查各個組織知識管理的現狀。這套理論模型是階段型表現方式(Staged Representation)。研究模型中皆包含三大元件:成熟度元件、知識管理流程元件以及促成要素元件。乃是基於SEI軟體工程協會「能力成熟度模型(CMM)」的成熟度階層,以持續流程改善的概念,建構出知識管理流程的五個成熟度階層。此外,依知識管理流程的四個主要次流程:知識創造、知識儲存、知識分享及知識應用,清楚地描繪組織在每個次流程中的成熟度表現。將知識管理促成要素整合進模型中,描述知識管理促成要素如何在每個成熟度階層裡支援組織達到成熟度階層所規範的目標。然後接下來,調查這些中小企業公司反映在知識管理成熟度模型矩陣上的績效值。另外再邀請三批專家進行不同產業領域,包含知識管理流程、文化、管理制度元件,請專家問卷項目來調查這些元件的因果關係(DEMATEL)。 第一個步驟,我們是以DEMATEL(Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory) 法進行專家版產業問卷調查,不同產業邀請不同產業專家進行元件因果重要程度調查。將DEMATEL因果關係矩陣結果,分別在三個不同的座標軸上表現出此三個產業內,知識管理元件間彼此重要程度關係。 第二個步驟,透過DEMATEL矩陣值,進行整體權重計算,與一連串相乘,再透過矩陣計算、正規化、重複自乘後,得到一個收斂的矩陣。這個也就是後來ANP各元件整體權重,用來表示領域專家所重視的組織知識管理各元件重要程度。 第三個步驟,我們透過KMMM知識管理階層模型,表現在不同階層的績效矩陣, 這個事先邀請中小企業業主,進行知識管理現狀績效調查,計算各個公司的知識管理績效值。這份績效問卷,依照知識管理理論與實務經驗,將不同問卷項目,歸類表現在不同階層上面。我們可以算出進行問卷的該公司,目前在那一個階層上面。這項KMMM模型是參考CMMI與米其林餐廳星級評比精神,透過階層模式,以激勵公司力爭上游改善公司績效與品質水準臻於至善。 第四步驟,將績效值正規化矩陣與整體權重矩陣進行矩陣相乘,並算出加權後績效值矩陣。我們透過整理得以知道,在這個加權後績效值矩陣有些元件落後這個階層門檻值,導致公司知識管理的成熟度無法達到下一個層次。這個有可能是組織知識管理瓶頸的所在。 第五個步驟,我們透過修正後VIKOR (VlseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje in Serbian)矩陣計算法找出最迫切修改元件所在,並且建議企業業主進行該元件之確認,後續進行追蹤,幫助正在中小企業公司,提供他們最迫切需要的幫助,進入下一道關卡。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Abstract
The global economic trend has shifted from “red-oceans” competition to “blue-oceans” innovation, but most companies are suffering because of low profits caused by hyper competition and OEM dead-end. Moreover, since the middle of 2008, the financial tsunami has caused serious damage to the global economy. Since 80% of the enterprises in Taiwan fall into the category of “Small and Medium Enterprises”, they lack the financial and systematic basis to introduce knowledge management practices and make innovations. The industrial structure and the size of companies are the major obstacles to companies internationalizing and strengthening their competitive advantages. Several researchers have explored the gaps in the knowledge management activities of enterprises. Their studies reveal that corporate performance is significantly influenced by those gaps. Knowledge management systems are not the first priority for SMEs. Senior managers do not see implementing KMS as the first “must-do” project. Our research aimed to clarify the misunderstanding of high expenditure on knowledge management systems adoption, and provided a novel approach for the most emergent knowledge management components to catch up the paces of their rival for the late adopter of knowledge management systems. How did we deal with them? The procedures of emergent knowledge management adoption were to: 1. Survey the present situation and actual state of knowledge management implementations by Knowledge Management Maturity Model (KMMM) 2. Find out where are the bottlenecks (KM Gaps) 3. Construct the KM adoption strategy by multiple criteria group decision-making approaches. (MCDM) 4. Examine several alternatives with conflicting and non-commensurable criteria to reduce the gaps and progress to the next KM stage as soon as possible. (Revised VIKOR) Our contributions were to survey the gaps of KMMM achievements, and to provide an approach for the ranking of KM aspects by most-urgent aspects to reach the next stage as soon as possible. Group decision-making, the essence of KM, lets one considers multi-dimensional problems for the decision-maker, sets priorities for each decision factor, and assesses rankings for all alternatives. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T04:47:09Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-98-D90725003-1.pdf: 5498133 bytes, checksum: 10b1b21959d6a629eaa32c515cfadcae (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | Table of Contents
論文口試委員審定書 i 謝 辭 ii 中文摘要 iii Abstract iv Table of Contents vi List of Figures ix List of Tables xi Chapter One. Introduction 1 1.1 Rationale 1 1.2 Research Background 2 1.3 Problem statement and Research objectives 4 1.4 Our Research Framework 5 1.5 Research Architecture 6 Chapter Two. KM processes and KM Capabilities 7 2.1 Knowledge Management Life Cycle Models 7 2.2 Organizational Knowledge Creation 9 2.3 The Spiral of Knowledge 9 2.4 Knowledge Management Processes 10 2.5 KM Capability 11 Chapter Three. CMMI and KMMM 13 3.1 Grounded Theory and Knowledge Management Gaps 13 3.2 Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI) 16 3.3 Knowledge Management Maturity Model 19 3.3.1 KPMG Surveys 19 3.3.2 Gabor Klimko - Knowledge management and Maturity Models 22 3.3.3 Karsten Ehms and Dr. Manfred Langen Methodology of KMMM 23 3.3.4 INFOSYS KM Initiative and KMMM 26 3.3.5 Knowledge Management Maturity Model Staged Representation 28 3.4 Procedures of KMMM Assessment 29 3.5 KMMM Performance Survey Questionnaire 31 Chapter Four. Our KMMM Survey 36 4.1 Five Maturity Levels of Knowledge Management 37 4.2 Knowledge Management Capabilities 38 4.3 KMM from Perspectives of Maturity, Capability, and KM Process 39 4.4 Research Method 41 4.5 Case Studies and Interview Participants 42 4.6. The Delphi Method 51 4.6.1. The rational of Delphi method 51 4.6.2. The Delphi Method Procedures 52 4.6.3. The focus group of performing Delphi Method 52 Chapter Five. Multiple Criteria Decision Making 53 5.1 MCDM Methodology 53 5.2 AHP and ANP 56 5.2.1 AHP 56 5.2.2 ANP 59 5.3 DEMATEL 62 5.3.1 The DEMATEL Method 62 5.3.2 Linguistic Variables 64 5.3.3 The DEMATEL Method Procedures 65 5.3.4 Result of Case A 68 5.4 VIKOR 69 5.5 Simple Additive Weighting Method (SAW) 74 Chapter Six. A novel MCDM model with ANP, DEMATEL, and VIKOR for SMEKM Adoption 75 6.1. The DEMATEL for Constructing a NRM 75 6.2. The ANP for Calculating Weights of Criteria Based on the NRM 80 6.3. The VIKOR for Ranking and Improving the Alternatives 82 6.3.1 Assessing the KM maturity of the IC Design, Banking, and services industries 85 6.3.2 Research Background and problem descriptions 86 6.4. Data collection and Representation 88 6.4.1 Constructing the NRM by DEMATEL 88 6.4.2 Calculating Weights of Each Criterion by ANP 91 6.4.3 Compromise Ranking by VIKOR 94 Chapter Seven. Managerial Implications and Discussions 99 7.1 The contribution of this study 99 7.2 The novel approach for emergent knowledge management adoption 102 7.3 The research finding and managerial implication 104 7.4 Contributions and Future work 117 Appendix 120 A.1 The consultants of SMEKM project 120 A.2 The goals of promoting the small and medium size enterprise knowledge management plan: 121 Reference 123 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 中小企業知識管理之能力與評估以及導入 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Knowledge Management Adoption, Capability, and Assessment for SMEs | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 97-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 博士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 曾國雄(Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng),陳鴻基(Houn-Gee Chen),盧希鵬(Hsi-Peng Lu),吳玲玲(Ling-Ling Wu) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 知識管理,中小企業,多準則決策,知識管理成熟度,知識管理導入, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Knowledge Management,Small and Medium Enterprises,Multiple Criteria Decision Making,Knowledge Management Adoption,Knowledge Management Maturity Model, | en |
dc.relation.page | 129 | |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2009-07-30 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 資訊管理學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 資訊管理學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-98-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 5.37 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。