請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/22909完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 黃麗君(Li-Chun Huang) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yen-Chun Lin | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 林彥君 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T04:33:07Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2011-08-20 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2011-08-16 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 1.行政院農委會 (2009)。農業統計年報。行政院農委會。
2.行政院新聞局(2004)。台灣節慶介紹。2011/05/20搜尋，http://info.gio.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=13568&CtNode=1839&mp=1 3.行政院主計處 (2010)。九十八年家庭收支調查報告。行政院主計處。 4.行政院主計處 (2011)。政府統計：人口靜態統計。2011/03/20搜尋，http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=15408&CtNode=4594。 5.朱惠英 (2006)。台南市男性上班族生活型態對情人節花束購買意願及屬性偏好影響之研究。朝陽設計學報，7，65-85。 6.朱耀源、朱玉瓊 (2002)。台灣發展花卉產業的利基。科學發展，351，40-49。 7.何金銘 (2001)。統計法輯要。台南：台灣復文興業股份有限公司。 8.吳佳綺(譯) (2008)。禮物的美學（原作者：Lewis Hyde）。臺北市：商周出版社。 9.吳育東 (1999)。多變量統計方法應用於行動電話消費者購買行為與滿意度之研究。國立成功大學統計學研究所碩士論文。 10.吳明隆 (2007)。SPSS操作與應用：問卷統計分析實務。台北市：五南。 11.吳明隆 (2008)。SPSS操作與應用—多變量分析實務。台北市：五南。 12.吳萬益 (2008)。企業研究方法。臺北市：華泰。 13.林昭儀 (2008)。歐洲花卉非傳統銷售通路。台灣花卉園藝，255，27-29。 14.林邦傑 (1996)。品質變項的因果分析：洛基對數線性模式及其應用。測驗年刊，33，125-141。 15.林嬰倫 (2005)。花卉商品自用型消費與贈禮型消費之購買決策模型比較。大葉大學人力資源暨公共關係研究所碩士論文。 16.邱皓政 (2011)。量化研究與統計分析。台北市：五南。 17.李宗儒 (1998)。消費者購買百合及劍蘭行為之分析。中華農學會報，185，41-55。 18.李哲昌 (1990)。台灣社會的送禮行為。國立台灣大學心理學研究所碩士論文。 19.李秀娥 (2003)。台灣傳統生命禮儀。台中市：晨星出版社。 20.李立峰 (2003)。花卉偏好基模與購買決策行為之研究。國立中山大學企業管理學研究所碩士論文。 21.李皇照 (1996)。家計單位切花消費行為之研究。臺灣經濟，232，60-87。 22.李皇照、呂美麗（2002）。「2001台灣花展－花與生活」參觀者問卷調查分析。農產運銷，125，10-21。 23.李皇照 (2004)。台灣花卉園藝市場之拓展。台灣花卉園藝，200，120-133。 24.李德治、童惠玲 (2009)。多變量分析—專題及論文常用的統計方法。台北市：雙葉。 25.周士傑 (2008)。消費者送禮導向與價值意識對其資訊搜尋量的影響。天主教輔仁大學管理學研究所碩士論文。 26.周文賢 (1999)。行銷管理－市場分析與策略規劃。台北市：智勝文化公司。 27.東方線上資料庫(2001)。上班族男女情人節常送的禮物，http://www.isurvey.com.tw/3_product/1_eicp_3.aspx，2011/03/18搜尋。 28.東方線上資料庫(2005)。耶誕節送禮行為特性—年輕、女性、卡片，http://www.isurvey.com.tw/7_eol/1_theme1.aspx?KeyWord=%E8%80%B6%E8%AA%95%E7%AF%80，2011/03/18搜尋。 29.東方線上資料庫 (2006)。台灣送禮市場趨勢分析(一)2001~2006市場潛量變化，http://www.isurvey.com.tw/5_member/login.aspx?BUrl=%2f7_eol%2f2_det ail.aspx%3fid%3d1235，2011/03/18搜尋。 30.東方線上資料庫(2010)。從母親節送禮看五、六、七年級差異，http://www.isurvey.com.tw/5_member/login.aspx?BUrl=%2f7_eol%2f2_detail.aspx%3fid%3d2502，2011/03/18搜尋。 31.東方線上資料庫(2010)。年年父親節－but熟年老爸，心事誰人知，http://www.isurvey.com.tw/5_member/login.aspx?BUrl=%2f7_eol%2f2_detail.aspx%3fid%3d2622，2011/03/18搜尋。 32.祖運輝 (1990)。簡介民族所藏『台灣風習一斑』並試述日治初期台灣人贈送禮品和金錢授受的習慣。中研院民族所資料彙編，2，149-177。 33.洪富連 (2011)。不可不知的生命禮儀。高雄市：麗文文化。 34.翁玲玲 (2004)。從外人到自己人：通過儀式的轉換性意義。廣西民族學院學報，26(6)，10-17。 35.郭貞 (1997)。地域差異、社會階層對台灣地區民眾之外顯式消費、綠色消費傾向與送禮文化之影響。廣告學研究，9，1-20。 36.陳月卿 (2008)。台灣花卉產業發展的政治經濟分析－全球市場、國家角色與地方發展的連動關係。國立中山大學政治學研究所碩士論文。 37.陳郁芝 (2003)。工作－居住空間區位均衡性之研究~以台北都會區為例。國立政治大學地政研究所碩士論文。 38.陳淑娟 (2008)。購買珠寶飾品因素評估之研究-資料包絡分析法之應用。義守大學管理研究所碩士班碩士論文。 39.陳文俊 (譯)(2005)。社會科學研究方法（原作者：Earl R. Babbie）。臺北：雙葉書廊。 40.陳正昌、程炳林、陳新豐、劉子鍵 (2007)。多變量分析方法－統計軟體應用。台北市：五南。 41.莊錦華 (1996a)。從美國花卉消費與促銷展望我國花卉零售市場（上）。農政與農情，52，40-52。 42.莊錦華 (1996b)。從美國花卉消費與促銷展望我國花卉零售市場（下）。農政與農情，53，35-46。 43.許恆明、潘明全、蔡健雄 (1999)。台北市與東京都切花消費之研究。農產運銷，119，39-48。 44.許蕙慈 (2009)。國中教師選購禮物之因素分析—以新竹縣為例。中華大學應用數學系研究所碩士論文。 45.黃俊英 (1989)。產品涉入衡量方法適用性之研究—李克量表與語意差異量表的比較。國立中山大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。 46.黃萬傳、謝俊雄、鍾震東 (1991)。臺灣地區花卉消費行為研究與拓銷策略規劃摘要。臺灣花卉園藝，55，41-46。 47.黃麗君、R. Mattson (2001)。花卉顏色屬性與香味屬性對消費者花卉購買意願之影響研究。農林學報，50(4)，43-55。 48.張家偉 (2010)。愛情關係發展過程的送禮行為探討。世新大學社會心理學系研究所碩士論文。 49.張俊彥 (1996)。台灣家庭園藝植物目標市場之社會人口分析。中國園藝， 42(3)，244-248。 50.潘德芳、楊世華 (1998)。玫瑰消費者之消費行為研究。中華農業研究，47(2)，179-186。 51.廖東梅 (2007)。節日沉浮問：節日的定義、結構與功能。中國：廣西師範大學出版社。 52.廖思婷、林晏州 (2004)。觀葉植物消費行為之研究。中國園藝，50 (1)，99-116。 53.廖思婷、林晏州(2006)。應用市場區隔原理探討觀葉植物消費者之特性。臺灣園藝，52 (1)，81-92。 54.黎明 (2005a)。花卉語言中的隱喻功能及其特點。綿陽師範學院學報，24(1)，99-106。 55.黎明 (2005b)。花卉語言及其運用。渝西學院學報，4(2)，85-89。 56.楊葆茜 (1995)。臺北市與臺中市家計單位花卉消費行為之分析。國立中興大學農產運銷研究所碩士論文。 57.葉姿芳 (2006)。娛樂性農業商品之消費價值研究—以台灣地區花卉商品為例。大葉大學人力資源暨公共關係研究所碩士論文。 58.閻雲翔 (2000)。禮物的流動：一個中國村莊中的互惠原則與社會網絡。上海：上海人民出版社。 59.羅文輝 (1994)。精確新聞報導。台北市：正中。 60.顏春蘭 (1990)。台北市花卉消費行為之研究。花卉研究與產銷研討會專集，台北市：台灣省台中區農業改良場，18，65-89。 61.蘇雅惠 (1991)。台北市花卉生產及消費調查。台北市：台灣大學農業推廣系。 62.劉春景 (2008)。透過花語看俄羅斯送花習俗。江西電力職業技術學院學報，21(1)，80-82。 63.盧素瑢 (2004)。贈禮行為之探討—個別送禮與聯合送禮對受禮者情感反應之影響。元智大學國際企業研究所碩士論文。 64.鄭金明 (2006)。世界節日的故事。台中市：好讀出版。 65.鐵翠香 (2007)。媒介環境下的洋節熱。當代傳播， 3，40-42。 66.AFMC Consumer Research (1979). A Psychographic Study of the Market for Flowers, The American Florists Marketing Council, Virginia, 10. 67.Areni, C. S., Kiecker, P. & Palan, K. M. (1998). Is it better to give than to receive? Exploring gender differences in the meaning of memorable gifts, Psychology and Marketing, 15(1), 81-109. 68.Arnold, V. G. (1960). The rites of passage, London : Routledge. 69.Babin, B. J., Darden, W. R. & Griffin, M. (1994). Work and/or Fun: Measuring Hedonic and Utilitarian Shopping value, Journal of Consumer Research, 20(4), 644-656. 70.Babin, B. J. & Darden, W. R. (1995). Consumer self-regulation in a retail environment, Journal of Retailing, 71(1), 47-70. 71.Baker, F. B. (1981). Log-Linear, Logit-Linear Models: A didactic, Journal of Educational Statistics, 6(1), 75-102. 72.Banks, S. K. (1979). Gift-giving: A Review and an Interactive paradigm, Advances in Consumer Research, 6(1), 319-324. 73.Baourakis, G., Gerasopoulos, D., Kalofolias, N., Kalogeras, N., & Zoumis, A. (2000). Marketing Research: The Case of Floral Products, Acta Hort, 541, 221-225. 74.Behe, B. K., Prince, T. A. & Tayama, H. K. (1992a). Analysis of Consumer Purchases of Floral Products in Supermarkets, HortScience, 27(5), 455-459. 75.Behe, B. K., Prince, T. A. & Tayama, H. K. (1992b). Market segmentation of supermarket floral customers, HortScience, 27(5), 459-462. 76.Behe, B. K. (1993). Floral marketing and consumer research, HortScience, 28(1), 11-14. 77.Belk, R.W. (1975). Situational Variables and Consumer Behavior, Journal of Consumer Research, 2(3), 157-164. 78.Belk, R.W. (1976). It's the thought that counts: A signed diagraph of gift giving, Journal of Consumer Research, 3(3), 155-162. 79.Belk, R. W. (1979). Gift-giving Behavior, Research in Marketing, 95-126, 2th ed, Jagdish N. Sheth, Greenwich, Connecticut: JAI Press. 80.Belk, R. W. (1982). Effects of Gift Giving Involvement on Gift Selection Strategies, Advances in Consumer Research, 9(1), 408-412. 81.Belk, R.W. & Coon, G. (1991). Can't Buy Me Love: Dating, Money and Gifts, Advances in Consumer Research, 18(1), 521-527. 82.Belk, R.W. & Coon, G. (1993). Gift Giving As Agapic Love: An Alternative to the Exchange Paradigm Based on Dating Experiences, Journal of Consumer Research, 20(3), 393-417. 83.Belk, R. W. (1996). The perfect gift, Gift giving: A research anthology, 59-84, Bowling Green, OH: Bowling Green State University Popular Press. 84.Bolle, F. (2001). Why to Buy Your Darling Flowers: on Cooperation and Exploitation, Theory & Decision, 50(1), 1-28. 85.Camerer, C. (1988). Gift as Economic Signals and Social Symbols, American Journal of Sociology, 94(Supplement), 180-214. 86.Caplow, T. (1984). Rule Enforcement without visible means: Christmas Gift-giving in Middletown, American Journal of Sociology, 89(6), 1306-1323. 87.Cheal, D. (1987). Showing them you love them: Gift giving and the dialectic of intimacy, The Sociological Review, 35(1), 150-169. 88.Cheal, D. (1988). The Gift Economy, London: Routledge. 89.Cote, N. G. & Deutsch, F. M. (2008). Flowers for mom, a Tie for Dad: How Gender is Created on Mother’s and Father’s Day, Gender Issues, 25(4), 215-228. 90.Daigler, S. (1995). Who Buys Flowers for Themselves? Floral Management, 12(1), 33-35. 91.Dindia, K., Timmerman, L., Langan, E., Sahlstein, E. M. & Quandt, J. (2004). The function of holiday greetings in maintaining relationships, Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21(5), 577-593. 92.Erikson, E. H. (1978). Toys and reasons : stages in the ritualization of experience, London: M. Boyars. 93.Fischer, E. & Arnold, S. J. (1990). More than a labor of Love: Gender roles and Christmas gift shopping, Journal of Consumer Research, 17(3), 333-345. 94.Fiske, J. (1990). Introduction to Communication Studies, London : Routledge. 95.Garner, T. I. & Wagner, J. (1991). Economic dimensions of household gift giving, Journal of Consumer Research, 18(3), 368-379. 96.Gehert, K. C. & Shim, S. (2002). Situational Influence in the International Marketplace: An Examination of Japanese Gift-Giving, Journal of Marketing Theory & Practice, 10(1), 11-22. 97.Goodwin, C., Smith, K. L. & Spiggle, S. (1990). Gift-Giving: Consumer Motivation and the Gift Purchasing Process, Advances in Consumer Research, 17(1), 690-698. 98.Goody, J. (1993). The culture of flowers, New York: Cambridge University Press. 99.Haberman, S. J. (1978). Analysis of qualitative data, New York: Acadamic Press. 100.Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L. & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis, Prentice Hall: New Jersey. 101.Harris, M. (1972). Bah Humbug, Natural History, 81(10), 21-25. 102.Huang, M. H. & Yu, S. (2000). Dration models to analyze dating relationships: the controversial role of gift giving, Family and consumer sciences research journal, 28(4), 411-427. 103.Huang, L. (2005). Floral Product Behaviors and their Influence on Consumer Floral Purchase Frequency, HortTechnology, 15(4), 776-771. 104.Huang, L. & Yeh, T. (2009). Floral Consumption Values for Consumer Groups with Different Purchase Choices for Flowers, HortTechnology, 19(3), 563-571. 105.Hughes, A. (2000). Retailers, knowledges, and changing commodity networks: the case of the cut flower trade, Geoforum, 31(2000), 175-190. 106.Joy, A. (2001). Gift-giving in Hong Kong and the Continuum of Social Ties, Journal of Consumer Research, 28(2), 239-256. 107.Katz, E. (1998). Broadcasting Holidays, Sociological Inquiry, 68(2), 230-241. 108.Komter, A. & Vollebergh, W. (1997). Gift giving and the emotional significance of family and friends, Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59(3), 747-757. 109.Kooten, O. V. & Kuiper, E. (2009). Consumer Acceptability in Flower Chains: How Can We Determine What the Final Customers Really Want? Acta Hort, 847, 17-26. 110.Kotler, P. (1991). Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning, Implementation and Control, 9th ed., New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc. 111.Kras, J. (1999). Marketing of Cut Flowers in the Future, Acta Hort, 482, 401-406. 112.Lamb, C. G., Farr, D. J. & McCartin, P. J. (1992). The NZ Consumer Market for Cut Flowers in the 90s, Agricultural & Economics Research Unit Research Report, 212, 1-43. 113.Larsen, D. & Watson, J. J. (2001). A guide map to the terrain of gift value, Psychology and Marketing, 18(8), 889-906. 114.Lutz, R. J. & Kakkar, P. (1975). The Psychological Situation as a Determinant of Consumer Behavior, Advances in Consumer Research, 2(1), 439-453. 115.Mauss, M. (1954). The Gift: The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies, London: Cohen &West. 116.Mick, D. G. & DeMoss, M. (1990). To Me from Me: A Descriptive Phenomenology of Self-Gifts, Advances in Consumer Research, 17(1), 677-682. 117.Nagle, T. T., Hogan, J. E. & Zale, J. (2009). The strategy and tactics of pricing: A guide to growing more profitably, Prentice Hall, NJ. 118.Neisser, M. (1973). The Sense of Self Expressed through Giving and Receiving, Social Casework, 54(5), 294-301. 119.Netemeyer, R. G. & Andrews, J. C. (1993). A comparison of three behavioral intention models: The case of Valentine’s day gift-giving, Advances in Consumer Research, 20(2), 135-141. 120.Nomura, M. (2009). Gift Giving Characteristics of Recipients and Functions of Gifting Anxieties, Master thesis, University of Wisconsin-Stout, Menomonie, WI. Retrieved Mar. 21, 2011, from http://www2.uwstout.edu/content/lib/thesis/2009/2009nomuram.pdf 121.Oppenheim, P. P. (1996). Understanding the Factors Influencing Consumer Choice of Cut Flowers: A Means-End Approach, Acta. Hort, 429, 415-422. 122.Otnes, C., Lowrey, T. M. & Kim, Y. C. (1993). Gift Selection for 'Easy' and 'Difficult' Recipients: A Social Roles Interpretation, Journal of Consumer Research, 20(2), 229-244. 123.Otnes, C. & Nelson, M. (1995). The children's birthday party: a study of mothers as socialization agents, Advances in Consumer Research, 22(1), 622-627. 124.Othman, M. N., Ong, F. S. & Teng, A. T. M. (2005). Occasions and Motivations for Gift-giving: A Comparative Study of Malay and Chinese Consumers in Urban Malaysia, Asia Pacific Management Review, 10(3), 197-204. 125.Osgood, C. E., Suci, C. J. & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957), The Measurement of Meaning, Urbana : University of Illinois Press. 126.Pandya, A. & Venkatesh, A. (1992). Symbolic Communication Among Consumers in Self-Consumption and Gift Giving: A Semiotic Approach, Advances in Consumer Research, 19(1), 147-154. 127.Petty, R. E. & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change, New York: Springer-Verlag. 128.Posner, E. A. (2000). Law and social norms, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. 129.Reinders, A. H. M. E., Vringer, K. & Blok, K. (2003). The direct and indirect energy requirement of households in the European Union, Energy Policy, 31(2), 139-153. 130.Rihn, A. L., Yue, C., Behe, B. & Hall, C. (2011). Generations X and Y Attitudes toward Fresh Flowers as Gifts: Implications for the Floral Industry, HortScience, 46(5), 736-743. 131.Rook, D. W. (1984). Ritual Behavior and Consumer Symbolism, Advances in Consumer Research, 11(1), 279-284. 132.Rook, D. W. (1985). The Ritual Dimension of Consumer Behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 12(3), 251-264. 133.Rokeach, M. (1973). The Nature of Human Values, New York：Free Press. 134.Rugimbana, R., Donahay, B., Neal, C. & Polonsky, M. J. (2003). The role of social power relations in gift giving on Valentine's day, Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 3(1), 63-73. 135.Singerhoff, L. (2006). Rituale, Redline GmbH. 136.Scammon, D. E., Shaw, R. T. & Bamossy, G. (1982). Is a Gift Always a Gift? An Investigation of Flower Purchasing Behavior Across Situations, Advances in Consumer Research, 9(1), 531-536. 137.Schiffman, L. G. & Cohn, D. Y. (2009). Are they playing by the same rules? A consumer gifting classification of marital dyads, Journal of Business Research, 62 (11), 1054-1062. 138.Seaton, B. (1995). The Language of Flowers: A History, University of Virginia Press. 139.Sherry, J. F. Jr. (1983). Gift Giving in Anthropological Perspective, Journal of Consumer Research, 10(2), 157-169. 140.Sherry, J. F. Jr. & McGrath, M. A. (1989). Unpacking the Holiday Presence: A Comparative Ethnography of Two Gift Stores, Interpretative Consumer Research, 148-167, Association for Consumer Research, Provo, UT. 141.Sherry, J. F. Jr., McGrath, M. A. & Levy, S. J. (1993). The Dark Side of the Gift, Journal of Business Research, 28(3), 225-244. 142.Sheth, J. N., Newman, B. I. & Gross, B. L. (1991). Why we buy what we buy: A theory of consumption values, Journal of Business Research, 22(2), 159-170. 143.Shurmer, P. (1971). The Gift Game, New Society, 18(482), 1242-1244. 144.Teigen, K. H., Olsen, M. V. G. & Solas, O. E. (2005). Giver-Receiver Asymmetries in Gift Preferences, British Journal of Social Psychology, 44(1), 125-144. 145.Van Tilburg, A. (1984). Consumer choice of cut flowers and pot plants, The Netherlands: Agricultural University Wageningen. 146.Wagner, J., Ettenson, R. & Verrier, S. (1990). The Effect of Donor-Recipient Involvement on Consumer Gift Decisions, Advances in Consumer Research, 17(1), 683-689. 147.Wolfinbarger, M. F. (1990). Motivations and symbolism in gift giving behavior, Advances in Consumer Research, 17(1), 699-706. 148.Wolfinbarger, M. F. & Yale, L. J. (1993). Three Motivations for Interpersonal Gift Giving: Experimental, Obligated and Practical Motivations, Advances in Consumer Research, 20(1), 520-526. 149.Wooten, D. B. (2000). Qualitative Steps toward an Expanded Model of Anxiety in Gift-giving, Journal of Consumer Research, 27(1), 84-95. 150.Yamane, K., Kawashima, M., Fujishige, N. & Yoshida, M. (2004). Effects of Interior Horticultural Activities with Potted Plants on Human Physiological and Emotional Status, Acta Hort, 639, 37-43. 151.Yeh, T. & Huang, L. (2009). An Analysis of Floral Consumption Values and Their Difference for Genders and Geographic Regions, HortTechnology, 19(1), 101-107. 152.Yue, C. & Hall, C. (2010). Traditional or Specialty Cut Flowers? Estimating U. S. Consumers’ Choice of Cut Flowers at Noncalendar Occasions, HortScience, 45(3), 382-386. 153.Ziegler, C. (2007). Self and signs: Flower consumers. Favored flowers: Culture and economy in a global system, 99-126, Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/22909 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 花卉是大自然美麗的意象之一，長久以來都具有傳遞感情的社會意涵功能，消費者透過贈花行為能表達及維持與收禮者之間的人際關係。然而在現階段台灣禮品市場中，因收禮者仍習慣以禮物酬賞的價值檢視贈禮者對雙方關係的重視程度，因此花卉禮品在各大送禮節日與各大送禮場合裡躍不上主流禮品之列，但實際需求又並非完全為零，因此花卉禮品的重要性值得進一步研究與推廣。本研究根據探討贈禮對象、與收禮者親密度、收禮者挑剔度、收禮者偏好、收禮者需求及花卉禮品價值對於花卉禮品類別選擇的影響，以及送禮節日的親密性與送禮場合的跨界性在上述因子對於花卉禮品類別選擇的關係上之干擾效果。研究結果期能對台灣日漸成熟的花卉產業做出實質貢獻，並協助建立花卉禮品在禮品市場中的定位與策略發展。
本研究以台灣地區的禮品消費族群為主要問卷調查抽樣對象，共蒐集400份有效樣本，運用卡方檢定、多項式羅吉斯迴歸分析(multinomial logistic regression)以及洛基對數線性分析(logit log-linear model)進行數據資料分析及假設驗證。研究結果顯示，當贈禮對象為親朋好友與父母時，贈禮者較會贈送花卉禮品，而贈禮對象為情人時，較會贈送一般禮物；與收禮者親密度、收禮者挑剔度、收禮者偏好和需求皆無法預測花卉禮品類別的選擇；花卉禮品價值的認知中僅有贈禮者愈認同其社會價值與經濟價值，贈送花卉禮品的可能性愈大。送禮節日的親密性高低與送禮場合的跨界性高低僅在贈禮對象對花卉禮品類別選擇上有干擾效果；在與收禮者親密度、收禮者挑剔度、收禮者偏好和需求及花卉禮品價值對花卉禮品類別選擇的影響上則沒有干擾效果；但送禮節日的親密性高低與送禮場合的跨界性高低卻會單獨對花卉禮品類別選擇產生影響，當送禮節日的親密性高與送禮場合的跨界性高時，贈禮者贈送花卉禮品的機率便愈高。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Flowers are the beautiful images of nature; in the long history of arts, flowers has been given blessing meanings and symbolism, so we human have regarded flowers as one kind of gifts that could communicate affection and maintain relationships also for a long time. However, due to cultural differences, giving flowers as one kind of gifts has not been a common custom in Taiwanese culture. In fact, according to the past market survey, “floral products” are hardly the top 5 gift items regardless of any gift-giving holidays and occasions. Thus, it is worthwhile to develop the demand and promote the importance of floral gifts in Taiwan. Therefore, this article aims at studying whether the relationships and intimacy levels between giver and receiver, the difficulties, preference and needs of receiver, and the four values of floral gifts have effect on floral gifts selection or not. Furthermore, this article also investigates whether the intimacy level of gift-giving holidays and the boundary level of gift-giving occasions’ rituals are termed as moderator variables between the above factors and floral gifts selection.
This study used sampling survey method to collect 400 effective respondents and utilized chi-square test, multinomial logistic regression and logit log-linear line model to examine the research hypotheses. Findings indicated that if giver sends gifts to close friends and parents, he will choose floral gifts more; if giver sends gifts to lovers, he will choose non-floral gifts more. The influences of the givers’ intimate level with receivers, the receivers’ fastidiousness, preference and needs of receiver on floral gifts selection is not significant; however, the more agreement to social and economic value of floral gifts, the higher probabilities to select floral or floral plus non-floral gifts. Furthermore, the high or low intimacy level of gift-giving holidays and the boundary level of gift-giving occasions’ rituals only have interaction with givers’ social relationships with receivers; in addition, they also have main effects on the choices of floral gifts. High intimacy of gift-giving holidays (as measured on nominal scale), givers would be more likely to choose floral plus non-floral gifts; and high boundary level of gift-giving occasions’ rituals, givers would be more likely to choose floral gifts. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T04:33:07Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-100-R97630011-1.pdf: 3322733 bytes, checksum: 29d15b5f02d403c59d6989086e44abd3 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書………………………………………………………ⅰ
謝誌………………………………………………………………………ⅱ 中文摘要…………………………………………………………………ⅲ 英文摘要…………………………………………………………………ⅳ 目錄………………………………………………………………………ⅵ 圖目錄……………………………………………………………………ⅷ 表目錄……………………………………………………………………ⅷ 第一章 緒論 ……………………………………………………………1 第一節 研究背景與動機………………………………………1 第二節 研究目的………………………………………………3 第二章 文獻探討 ………………………………………………………5 第一節 台灣花卉產業概述……………………………………5 第二節 贈禮行為…………………………………………… 17 第三章 研究方法 ……………………………………………………41 第一節 研究架構 ……………………………………………41 第二節 研究變項定義與衡量問項設定…………………… 42 第三節 問卷設計 ……………………………………………48 第四節 問卷預試 ……………………………………………52 第五節 抽樣設計 ……………………………………………53 第六節 資料分析方法 ………………………………………56 第四章 資料分析與結果………………………………………………59 第一節 樣本結構分析 ………………………………………59 第二節 贈禮行為分析 ………………………………………63 第三節 樣本信度與效度分析……………………………… 66 第四節 主要效果假設驗證 …………………………………69 第五節 干擾效果假設驗證………………………………… 77 第五章 結論與建議 ……………………………………………… 105 第一節 研究結果與討論 ………………………………… 105 第二節 行銷管理意涵 …………………………………… 111 第三節 研究限制與建議 ………………………………… 113 參考文獻……………………………………………………………… 115 附錄…………………………………………………………………… 129 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.title | 節日與時節跨界性對花卉禮品購買決策之影響 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Effects of Holidays and Occasions’ Boundary Rituals on Floral Gifts Purchasing Decisions | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 99-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 邱玉蟬(Yu-Chan Chiu),黃文星(Wen-Hsing Huang) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 贈禮行為,花卉禮品,花卉禮品價值,節日親密性,場合儀式跨界性, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | gift-giving behavior,floral gifts,value of floral gifts,intimacy level of gift-giving holidays,boundary level of gift-giving occasions’ rituals, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 135 | |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2011-08-17 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 生物產業傳播暨發展學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 生物產業傳播暨發展學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-100-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 3.24 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。