請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/22778
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 郭瑞祥 | |
dc.contributor.author | Shih-Hsien Yu | en |
dc.contributor.author | 余師嫻 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T04:27:50Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2010-02-11 | |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2010-02-05 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 一、中文部分
1. 王品集團官方網站http://www.wangsteak.com.tw 2. 王素彎、張毓惠、林樹煜(2007)。商業發展情勢及策略之規劃:商業創新經營模式之探討。台北市:經濟部。 3. 王樵一(2007)。撐貣食品的一片天。台北市:超邁文化國際。 4. 王樵一(2007)。通路教父徐重仁。台北市:超邁文化國際。 5. 公共電視臺(2005)。統一超商與徐重仁反敗為勝的故事。台北市:公共電視。 6. 李仁芳(1995)。7-ELEVEN 統一超商縱橫台灣。台北市:遠流出版。 7. 李書齊(2005)。成功,要比別人更有遠見。數位時代。 8. 呂馨玲(2008)。別人的難題,3M的致富良機。天下雜誌,397。 9. 松下電器官方網站http://www.panasonic.net/ 10. 林宜諄(2004)。前進的動力:戴勝益鼓勵創業 成長不息。遠見雜誌,217。 11. 林宏達(2005)。左元淮「蓄電」十九年 拚到逾億身價。商業週刊,897,66 12. 陳嬿文(2006)。戴勝益的海豚領導學。卓越雜誌,260,104-107 13. 陳芳毓(2008)。複製成功模式的know-how。經理人月刊, 46,53-105 14. 茂迪官方網站http://www.motech.com.tw/chinese/index.asp 15. 茂迪年報(2003)。 16. 統一企業官方網站http://www.uni-president.com.tw/ 17. 統一超商官方網站http://www.7-11.com.tw/ 18. 黃亞琪(2006)。靠太陽發熱的企業-茂迪科技。台灣光華智庫。 19. 楊美玲(2005)。王品集團快速展店的秘訣。數位時代,111,100-102。 20. 鄭呈皇(2006)。《個案篇》七星山的對談開啟股王傳奇。商業周刊,945,130 21. 熊毅晰(2007)。左元淮掀貣太陽能電池片大陏命。天下雜誌,376 52 二、英文部分 1. Argyris, C., & Schön, D. 1996. Organizational learning II: Theory, method and practice: Reading, Mass: Addison Wesley. 2. Backholm, A. 1999. Corporate Venturing: An Overview. 3. Barney, J. 1991. “Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage,” Journal of Management: 99: Sage Publications, Ltd. 4. Biggadike, R. 1979. “The risky business of diversification,” Harvard Business Review, 57(3): 103-111. 5. Birkinshaw, J., & Hill, S. A. 2005. “Corporate Venturing Units: Vehicles for Strategic Success in the New Europe,” Organizational Dynamics, 34(3): 247-257. 6. Block, Z. 1982. “Can corporate venturing succeed?” Journal of Business Strategy, 3(2): 21. 7. Block, Z. 1989. “Damage Control for New Corporate Ventures,” The Journal of Business Strategy, 10(2): 22. 8. Block, Z., & MacMillan, I. C. 1993. Corporate Venturing-Creating New Business within the Firm. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. 9. Burgelman, R. A. 1983. A Process Model of Internal Corporate Venturing in the Diversified Major Firm. Administrative Science Quarterly: 223-244: Administrative Science Quarterly. 10. Burgelman, R. A., & Doz, Y. L. 2001. “The power of strategic integration.,” Sloan Management Review, 42(3): 28-38. 11. Burgelman, R. A., & Välikangas, L. V. 2005. Managing Internal Corporate Venturing Cycles. MIT Sloan Management Review, 46(4): 26-37. 12. Burgers, J. H., Van Den Bosch, F. A. J., Volberda, H. W., Rudy Martens, A. H., & Ron, S. 2007. The impact of corporate venturing on a firm's competence modes. Advances in Applied Business Strategy: 117-140: No longer published by Elsevier. 13. Christensen, C.M., & Raynor, M. E. 2003. The Innovator’s Solution: Creating and Sustaining successful Growth. Harvard Business School Press. 14. Ciborra, C. 1991. Alliances as learning experiments: cooperation, competition, and change in high-tech industries. London. 15. Cohen W., and D. Levinthal. 1990. 'Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation.' Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1):128-152. 16. Covin, J. G., & Miles, M. P. 1999. Corporate Entrepreneurship and the Pursuit of Competitive Advantage. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice: 47-63: Blackwell Publishing Limited. 17. Covin, J. G., & Miles, M. P. 2007. Strategic Use of Corporate Venturing. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice: 183-207: Blackwell Publishing Limited. 18. Crossan, M. M., Lane, H. W., & White, R. E. 1999. “An organizational learning framework: from intuition to institution,” Academy of Management Review, 24(3): 522-537. 19. Cyert, r. M., & March, J. G. 1963. A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs: NJ.: Prentice-Hall, Inc. 20. Day, D. L. 1994. “Raising Radicals Different Processes for Championing Innovative Corporate Ventures,” Organization Science, 5(2): 148-172. 21. Desarbo, W., Macmillan, I. C., & Day, D. L. 1987. “Criteria for corporate venturing: Importance assigned by managers,” Journal of Business Venturing, 2(4): 329-350. 22. Dess, G. G., Ireland, R. D., & Zahra, S. A. 2003. “Emerging Issues in Corporate Entrepreneurship,” Journal of Management, 29(3): 351-378. 23. Dewar, R., & Rao, h. 2005. UPS Supply Chain Solutions: Kellogg School of Management. 24. Dougherty, D. 1995. Managing Your Core Incompetencies for Corporate Venturing. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice: 113-135: Blackwell Publishing Limited. 25. Edward, B. R., & Charles, A. B. 1985. “Entering New Businesses: Selecting Strategies for Success,” Sloan Management Review (pre-1986), 26(3): 3. 26. Ellis, R. J., & Taylor, N. 1987. Specifying entrepreneurship. In Frontiers of entrepreneurship research. Wellesley: Babson College. 27. Fast, N. D. 1979. “Key managerial factors in new venture departments,” Industrial Marketing Management, 8(3): 221-235. 28. Garvin, D. A. L., Lynne C. 2006. Strategic Planning at United Parcel Service. Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing. 29. Ginsberg, A., & Hay, M. 1994. “Confronting the challenges of corporate entrepreneurship: Guidelines for venture managers,” European Management Journal, 12(4): 382-389. 30. Gnyawali, D. R., & Grant, J. H. 1997. “Enhancing Corporate Venture Performance Through Organizational Learning,” International Journal of Organizational Analysis (1993 - 2002), 5(1): 74. 31. Govindarajan, V., & Trimble, C. 2005. “Organizational DNA for Strategic Innovation,” California Management Review, 47(3): 47-76. 32. Grant, R. M. 1996. “Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal, 17: 109-122. 33. Guth, W. D., and Ginsberg, A. (1990). “Guest editors’ introduction Corporate entrepreneurship,” Strategic Management Journal, 11(Summer), 5–15. 34. Hagedoorn, J. 1993. “Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: Nterorganizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences,” Strategic Management Journal, 14(5): 371-385. 35. Hamel, Gary and Prahalad, C.K.1993. “Strategy as stretch and leverage,” Harvard Business Review, 71(2): 75-84. 36. Hill, S. A., & Birkinshaw, J. 2008. “Strategy-organization configurations in corporate venture units: Impact on performance and survival,” Journal of Business Venturing, 23(4): 423-444. 37. Huber, G. P. 1991. “Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures,” Organization Science, 2(1): 88-115. 38. Ireland, R. D., Hitt, M., Camp, S.M., & Sexton, D. L. 2001. “Integrating entrepreneurship and strategic management actions to create firm wealth.,” Academy of Management Executive, 15 (1): 15. 39. Kanter, R. M. 1989. “Swimming In Newstreams: Mastering Innovation Dilemas,” California Management Review, 31(4): 45. 40. Keil, T. 2004. Building External Corporate Venturing Capability. Journal of Management Studies, 41(5): 799-825. 41. Kogut, Bruce & Zander, Udo.1992. Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology. Organization Science, 3(3): 383-397. 42. Levitt, B., & March, J. G. 1988. “Organizational Learning,” Annual Review of Sociology, 14(1): 319-338. 43. Luo, Y. 2000. Dynamic Capabilities In International Expansion: Elsevier Science Publishing Company, Inc. 44. MacMillan, I. C., Block, Z., & Narasimha, P. N. S. 1986. “Corporate venturing: alternatives, obstacles encountered, and experience effects,” Journal of Business Venturing, 1(2): 177-191. 45. MacMillan, I. C., & Day, D. L. 1987. “Corporate ventures into industrial markets: Dynamics of aggressive entry,” Journal of Business Venturing, 2(1): 29-39. 46. Markides, C. C. & Willliamson, P. J. (1994). Related Diversification, Core Competences and Corporate Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 14(5): 149-165. 47. McGrath, R. G., & Keil, T. 2007. The Value Captor's Process. Harvard Business Review: 128-136: Harvard Business School Publication Corp. 48. Miles, M. P., & Covin, J. G. 2002. Exploring the Practice of Corporate Venturing: Some Common Forms and Their Organizational Implications. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice: 21-40: Blackwell Publishing Limited. 49. Miller, A., Spann, M. S., & Lerner, L. 1991. “Competitive advantages in new corporate ventures: The impact of resource sharing and reporting level,” Journal of Business Venturing, 6(5): 335-350. 50. Narayanan, V. K., Yang, Y., & Zahra, S. A. 2009. “Corporate venturing and value creation: A review and proposed framework,” Research Policy, 38(1): 58-76. 51. Niemann, G. 2007. Big Brown: The Untold Story of UPS John Wiley & Sons Inc. 52. Nonaka, I. 1988. “Toward Middle-Up-Down Management: Accelerating Information Creation,” Sloan Management Review, 29(3):9 53. Nonaka, I. 1994. “A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation,” Organizational science, 5(1):14-37 54. Powell, W. W. 1998. “Learning from collaboration: Knowledge and networks in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries.” California Management Review, 40(3):228-240. 55. Rind, K. W. 1981. “The role of venture capital in corporate development.” Strategic Management Journal,2(2), 169-180. 56. Roberts, E. B. 1980. “New ventures for corporate growth.” Harvard Business Review, 58(4), 134-142. 57. Sambrook, S. & Roberts, C. 2005. “Corporate entrepreneurship and organizational learning: a review of the literature and the development of a conceptual framework,” Strategic Change, 14(3):141-155 58. Sathe, V. 2003. “Corporate Entrepreneurship: Top Managers and New Business Creation,” first ed. Cambridge University, Cambridge. 59. Schildt, K., Beaumaster, S., & Edwards, M. 2005. “Strategic Information Technology Management: Managing Organizational, Political, and Technological Forces,” Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. 60. Scott, D. A., Mark, W. J., & Joseph, V. S. 2008. “Institutionalizing Innovation,” MIT Sloan Management Review, 49(2): 45. 61. Sharma, P., & Chrisman, J. J. 1999. Toward a Reconciliation of the Definitional Issues in the Field of Corporate Entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice: 11-27: Blackwell Publishing Limited. 62. Sorrentino, M., & Williams, M. L. 1995. “Relatedness and corporate venturing: Does it really matter?” Journal of Business Venturing, 10(1): 59-73. 63. Sykes, H. B. 1986. “The anatomy of a corporate venturing program: Factors influencing success,” Journal of Business Venturing, 1(3): 275-293. 64. Teece, D., J. 1998. “Capturing value from knowledge assets: The new economy, markets for know-how, and intangible assets,” California Management Review, 40(3): 55. 65. Von Hippel, E. 1977. “Successful and failing internal corporate ventures: An empirical analysis,” Industrial Marketing Management, 6(3): 163-174. 66. Wernerfelt, B. 1984. “A resource-based view of firm.” Strategic Management Journal. 5, 2: 171-180. 67. Wolcott, R. C., & Lippitz, M. J. 2007. “The Four Models of Corporate Entrepreneurship,” MIT Sloan Management Review, 49(1): 75. 68. Zahra, S. A. 2005. Introduction. In: Corporate Entrepreneurship and Growth. Cheltenham, UK. 69. Zahra, S. A., & Hayton, J. 2008. “The effect of international venturing on firm performance:the moderating influence of absorptive capacity.,” Journal of Business Venturing, 23. 70. Zahra, S. A., Nielsen, A. P., & Bogner, W. C. 1999. Corporate Entrepreneurship, Knowledge, and Competence Development. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice: 169-189: Blackwell Publishing Limited. 71. Zenas, B. 1982. “Can corporate venturing succeed?,” Journal of Business Strategy, 3(2): 21. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/22778 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 企業成長是經營者必頇陎對的挑戰,亦是策略領域重要的研究課題。過去十年來,許多企業透過內部創業活動進行新事業的發展,因而刺激了管理學界對該議題大量而廣泛的探討與重視。 然而過去文獻較專注於某些特定主題、產業或地區,且多以執行陎的變數作為分類依據;因此本研究主要目的是以策略觀點,依「核心能力」與「事業範疇」為兩軸,建構一分類模型,提出「複製模組」、「推進引擎」、「共生齒輪」、「成長跳板」四種內部創業模式;此外,更進一步以資源基礎理論與組織學習觀點探討不同內部創業模式在執行策略、創業機制以及學習特徵三大構陎之做法,並輔以內部創業成功個案說明,提供企業與學術界一個對內部創業的新思維。 根據本研究結果顯示,企業應先釐清發展內部創業之策略目的,並由資源規劃的角度了解新事業與母公司之間的關係;此外,母公司角色與知識創造流程應依不同的內部創業模式而有所調整;最後,就學習特徵而言,內部創業之學習模式同時包含內部創造與外部取得,推進引擎應強調新事業知識的取得,而共生齒輪則應注重內部發展以符合既有事業。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Business growth is the challenge that every CEO has to face out, and is the issue that strategic scholars talk about. Over the past decades, more and more corporate venturing cases in the business world captured the eye of managerial savants. However, owing to the widespread nature of corporate venturing, literatures focused on specific topics, industries or local areas. Thus, this study constructs a topologic model with two strategic dimensions: core competence and business scope, and bring out four varieties of corporate venturing: Duplicate, Propulsion, Symbiosis and Relay. Furthermore, we suggest the features of different forms in strategic development, mechanism design, and organizational learning and provide a distinct thinking process of corporate venturing to enterprises and academia. According to this study, firms should understand the strategic objectives and the relationship between parent and venture units from a resource planning view. In addition, parent has to authorize and prohibit appropriately in the process of corporate venturing. Finally, from the organizational learning perspective, corporate venturing often include acquiring and developing learning modes. However, firms sometimes only generate knowledge from outside to create the short-term performance. Thus, firms should understand what kind of models they belong to, and take account of the organizational learning modes in new business creation process. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T04:27:50Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-99-R96741030-1.pdf: 392542 bytes, checksum: aff233f2fc0c4d72fe27a09731a5e55a (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論 ............................................................................................................... 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 ...................................................................................... 1 第二節 研究目的 .................................................................................................. 2 第三節 研究流程 .................................................................................................. 3 第二章 文獻探討 ....................................................................................................... 4 第一節 企業內部創業定義與意涵 ...................................................................... 4 第二節 相關理論 .................................................................................................. 5 第三節 企業內部創業研究方向 ........................................................................ 10 第三章 研究架構與方法 ......................................................................................... 18 第一節 研究架構 ................................................................................................ 18 第二節 變數衡量 ................................................................................................ 20 第三節 資料收集與分析 .................................................................................... 25 第四節 個案簡介 ................................................................................................ 25 第四章 個案研究 ..................................................................................................... 30 第一節 複製模組-王品集團與品田牧場 ........................................................ 30 第二節 推進引擎-UPS與供應鏈解決方案 .................................................... 33 第三節 共生齒輪-統一企業與統一超商 ........................................................ 37 第四節 成長跳板-茂迪與光電事業部門 ........................................................ 40 第五節 綜合比較 ................................................................................................ 44 第五章 結論與建議 ................................................................................................. 48 第一節 研究結論 ................................................................................................ 48 第二節 學術貢獻與管理意涵 ............................................................................ 49 第三節 研究限制與未來研究 ............................................................................ 50 參考文獻 ..................................................................................................................... 51 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 企業內部創業策略類型與分析-資源基礎與組織學習觀點 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Strategic Typology and Analysis of Corporate Venturing -Resource-Based and Organizational learning Perspectives | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 98-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.coadvisor | 陳忠仁 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 洪世章,林博文 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 企業內部創業,企業成長,新事業發展, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Corporate Venturing,Growth Strategy,New Business Creation, | en |
dc.relation.page | 58 | |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2010-02-08 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 商學組 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 商學組 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-99-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 383.34 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。