請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/22637
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 謝德宗 | |
dc.contributor.author | Yu-Wen Huang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 黃郁文 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T04:23:04Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2010-07-07 | |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2010-06-29 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 中文文獻
1.嚴宗大、林昱君、鍾琴(1992),「台商大陸投資及貿易之研究」, 中華經濟研究院。 2.吳惠林(1997),「海外投資與產業空洞化」,輸出入金融雙月刊,第73期,頁2-6。 3.劉碧珍與翁永和(2000),影響台灣廠商外銷接單與出口行為因素之探討,經濟部研究報告。 4.張淑真(2000),「台商赴大陸投資對台灣經濟的影響」,高雄應用科技大學學報,第30卷,頁389-414。 5.張德盛(2000),「出口競爭力與台灣對外直接投資」,國立中山大學管理學院,碩士論文。 6.童振源(2000),「台灣與『中國』經貿關係-經濟與安全的交易」,遠景季刊,第1卷第2期,31-82頁。 7.陳添枝、顧瑩華(2001),「海外投資對國內就業的影響」,台灣大學經濟所,產業經濟研討會。 8.高長(2001),「製造業赴大投資經營當地化及其對台灣經濟之影響」,經濟情勢暨評論,第7卷,第1期,頁138-173。 9.康信鴻、鄭宛昕(2002),「台商投資中國大陸對本土產業及經濟之影響—以傳統產業為例」,臺灣銀行季刊,第54卷,第2期,6月,頁61-76。 10.周玉姍(2002),「對外投資對產業空洞化之影響-以台灣製造業為例」,國立台灣大學經濟學研究所,碩士論文。 11.劉碧珍(2002),《從廠商外銷接單、出口行為與國內外投資看台灣產業之發展》,經濟部委託計畫。 12.劉庭彰(2003),「台灣高科技產業赴中國大陸投資對台灣經濟的影響」,國立成功大學企業管理學系,碩士論文。 13.高長(2003),「兩岸經貿發展之競合趨勢」,台灣大學經濟所,產業經濟研討會。 14.顧瑩華(2005),「台商西進對台灣就業的影響」,全球台商e焦點、雙週刊,第21期。 15.楊奕農(2005),《時間序列分析:經濟與財務上之應用》,台北:雙葉書廊。 16.劉碧珍(2005),「對外投資、海外生產 對國內研發、勞工僱用與薪資的影響」,經濟部委外研究報告。 17.江貞虹(2006),「對外直接投資、出口、匯率與失業率關聯性之研究」,大葉大學國際企業管理學系,碩士論文。 18.林祖嘉、黃啟宏(2006),「對外投資與勞動結構調整:台灣的實證分析」,人文及社會科學期刊,第18卷第1期,171-214頁。 19.趙立珍(2007),「外人直接投資對台灣失業率及出口的衝擊」,國立交通大學經營管理研究所,碩士論文。 20.陳旭昇(2009),《時間序列分析:總體經濟與財務金融之應用(修訂版)》,台北:東華書局。 英文文獻 1.Alguacil, M. and V. Orts (2002), “A Multivariate Cointegrated Model Testing forTemporal Causality between Exports and Outward Foreign Investment: the Spanish Case”, Applied Economics, 34, pp. 119-132. 2.Baldwin, R.E., Gianmarco I.P. Ottaviano(2001), “ Multiproduct Multinationals and Reciprocal FDI Dumping”, Journal of International Economics, Vol. 54, No. 2, pp.429-448. 3.Belderbos, R. and L. Sleuwaegen (1998), “Tariff Jumping FDI and Export Substitution: Japanese Electronic Firms in Europe,” International Journal of Industrial Organization, 16, pp. 601-638. 4.Blomstroem, M., and A. Kokko(1994),”Home Country Effects of Foreign Direct Investment: Evidence from Sweden”, NBER Working Paper No. 4639. 5.Blomstroem, M., R. E. Lipsey, and K. Kulchycky (1988), “U.S. and Swedish Direct Investment and Exports,” NBER Working Paper No 2390. 6.Blomstroem, M., G. Fors, and R. E. Lipsey(1997), “Foreign Direct Investment and Employment:Home Country Experience in the United States and Sweden”, Economic Journal, 107, pp. 1787-1797. 7.Blonigen, B. A.(2001), “In Search of Substitution between Foreign Production and Exports”, Journal of International Economics, 53, pp. 81-104. 8.Chen, Tain-Jy and Ying –Hua Ku(2000), “The Effect of Foreign Direct Investment and Firm Growth : The Case of Taiwan’s Manufacturers”, Japan and the World Economy, 12, pp. 153-172. 9.Granger, Clive W. J. (1969), “Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Model and Cross Spectral Methods” Econometrica, 37, pp. 424-438. 10.Granger, Clive W. J. and Newbold, P. (1974), “Spurious Regressions in Econometrics”, Journal of Econometrics, vol. 2, Iss.2, pp. 111-120. 11.Kravis, I. B., and R. E. Lipsey(1988),”National Price Levels and the Prices of Tradables and Nontradables”, NBER Working Paper No. 2760. 12.Lin, H. & Yeh, R.S.(2002),“To Invest or Not to Invest in China: the Choice of Taiwanese Small and Medium Enterprises”, Small Business Economics. 13.Lipsey, R.E.(1994), “Outward Direct Investment and the U.S. Economy”, NBER Working Paper No. 4691. 14.Markusen, J.R. and Maskus, K.E. (2001), “General-Equilibrium Approaches to the Multinational Firm: A Review of Theory and Evidence”, NBER Working Paper No. 8334. 15.Oscar B.R. and Maria M.M. (2001), “Foreign Direct Investment and Trade:A Causality Analysis”, Open Economies Review.12, Iss.3, pp.305-323. 16.Purvis, Douglas D. (1972), 'Technology, Trade and Factor Mobility,' Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 82, Iss.327, pp. 991-999. 17.Sims, Christopher A. (1980), “Macroeconomics and Reality”, Econometrica, vol. 48, Iss.1, pp. 1-48. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/22637 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 自2002 年迄今,中國大陸持續位居台灣對外投資金額首位,持續為台灣第一大出口市場和最大貿易出超來源,顯見台灣產業對中國大陸市場的高度依賴。隨著台商對中國大陸投資持續成長,台灣對中國大陸(含香港)出口比重持續上升,然而對美、歐、日的出口比重卻持續下滑,兩者消長現象愈趨明顯,是否對台灣整體出口造成影響?另,赴中國大陸投資是否亦為台灣失業率居高不下的主因?均為值得探究的議題。因此,本文以台灣赴中國大陸投資額、出口總值與失業率等3項變數進行實證研究,利用單根檢定、VAR等計量方法建立實證模型,並進一步採用Granger因果分析、衝擊反應函數及變異數分解等方法,深入探討3者的相互關係。
實證結果獲得的重要結論如下: 1.赴中國大陸投資具持續效果,顯然已成一股無可避免的趨勢,而其受出口成長率的正向影響大於失業率的正向影響,顯示整體出口成長率增加,經濟景氣改善,赴中國大陸投資額亦會增加;而因經濟不景氣、失業率高的情況下才赴中國大陸投資的成份較少。 2.赴中國大陸投資對於整體出口成長率較具直接相關性,對於失業率較不具相關。惟赴中國大陸投資將使整體出口成長率增加的說法,未獲本研究證實。 3.赴中國大陸投資與失業率之間不存在必然的直接關係,欲降低失業率,主要不在於限制赴中國大陸投資金額多寡,而在於強化國內出口成長動能,並使國內出口不因赴中國大陸投資而被取代。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Since 2002 till now, mainland China has consistently been the first priority place that Taiwan’s firms invest annually the most amount in than in other countries. Mainland China has also been the largest export market of Taiwan and the main source of Taiwan’s trade revenue. This indicates Taiwan’s industries highly rely on China market. When Taiwan’s investment in China increases, the proportion of Taiwan’s exports to China (including H.K.) to the world is rising, while the proportion to US, Europe and Japan is declining. The increasing and decreasing situation is gradually obvious. Would Taiwan’s investment in China have impact on Taiwan’s whole export? Besides, would Taiwan’s large investment in China be the main cause of the high unemployment rate? Both issues are worth exploring the answers. Therefore, this article is focusing on 3 variables as follows to conduct the empirical analysis, including Taiwan’s investment in China, Taiwan’s whole export value, and Taiwan’s unemployment rate. With unit root test, VAR model, Granger causality analysis, impulse response function and variance decomposition methods, we can research the multiple relationships of these 3 variables.
The empirical analysis obtains results as follows: 1.Taiwan’s investment flowing into China has a continuing effect, apparently it has become a inevitable tendency. It has been positively influenced by the export growth rate more than by the unemployment rate. When the whole export growth rate increases, the economy improves, the amount of Taiwan’s investment in China will also increase. It is less because of the economic recession with high unemployment rate, then Taiwan’s investment flows into China. 2.Taiwan’s investment in China has more direct relevance with Taiwan’s whole export growth rate, than with the rate of unemployment. However, the statement that Taiwan’s investment flowing into China will increase Taiwan’s whole export growth rate is not proved by this research. 3.Taiwan’s large investment in China does not have the consequential relationship with Taiwan’s unemployment rate. If we want to reduce the rate of unemployment, the effective measures is not to limit the investment amount flowing into China, but to strengthen the momentum of Taiwan’s export growth, and make the domestic export not be replaced by the investment in China. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T04:23:04Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-99-P96323016-1.pdf: 905946 bytes, checksum: 527d93c9f2b2b03aa56d9ee0d85b2d9d (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書………………………………………………i
誌謝…………………………………………………………….ii 中文摘要……………………………………………………… iii 英文摘要…………………………………………………………iv 目錄……………………………………………………………… v 圖目錄……………………………………………………………vi 表目錄……………………………………………………………vii 第一章 緒論…………………………………………………………………1 1.1 研究背景與動機……………………………………………1 1.2 研究目的……………………………………………………5 1.3 本文架構與流程……………………………………………6 第二章 文獻回顧……………………………………………….7 2.1 對外投資對母國出口的影響………………………………7 2.2 對外投資對母國就業的影響…………………………… 10 第三章 實證模型與資料處理…………………………………15 3.1 實證模型的建立……………………………………………15 3.2 資料來源與處理……………………………………………22 第四章 實證結果分析…..……………………………………26 4.1 VAR模型實證結果………………………………………26 4.2 Granger因果檢定………………………………………27 4.3 衝擊反應分析…………………………………………29 4.4 變異數分解……………………………………………33 第五章 結論與建議…………………………………………36 5.1 研究結論………………………………………………36 5.2 研究限制………………………………………………37 5.3 未來研究方向建議……………………………………38 參考文獻……………………………………………………39 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 赴中國大陸投資與台灣出口、失業率關聯性之研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | A Study of the Relationships among Taiwan’s Firms Investing in Mainland China, Taiwan’s Export, and Unemployment Rate | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 98-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 李顯峰,賴錦璋 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 赴中國大陸投資,出口,失業率,向量自我迴歸模型,Granger因果檢定,衝擊反應,變異數分解, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Taiwan’s investment in China,export,unemployment rate,VAR,Granger causality analysis,impulse response function,variance decomposition, | en |
dc.relation.page | 42 | |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2010-06-29 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 經濟學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 經濟學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-99-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 884.71 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。