請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/22241
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 林光華(Kwan-Hwa Lin) | |
dc.contributor.author | I-Fan Shih | en |
dc.contributor.author | 施怡帆 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T04:14:14Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2010-09-09 | |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2010-08-12 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 1. O’ Sullivan SB, Schmitz TJ. Physical Rehabilitation-Assessment and Treatment F.A Davis company; 2001.
2. Chen R, Chang S, Su C. Prevalence, incidence, and mortality of PD: a door-to-door survey in Ilan county, Taiwan. Neurology 2001;57:1679. 3. Takakusaki K, Oohinata-Sugimoto J, Saitoh K, Habaguchi T. Role of basal ganglia-brainstem systems in the control of postural muscle tone and locomotion. Progress in Brain Research 2004;143:231-7. 4. Olanow C, Watts R, Koller W. An algorithm (decision tree) for the management of Parkinson's disease (2001):: Treatment. Neurology 2001;56:1. 5. Bejjani B, Gervais D, Arnulf I, Papadopoulos S, Demeret S, Bonnet A et al. Axial parkinsonian symptoms can be improved: the role of levodopa and bilateral subthalamic stimulation. British Medical Journal 2000;68:595. 6. Bronte-Stewart H, Minn A, Rodrigues K, Buckley E, Nashner L. Postural instability in idiopathic Parkinson's disease: the role of medication and unilateral pallidotomy. Brain 2002;125:2100. 7. Visser M, van Rooden S, Verbaan D, Marinus J, Stiggelbout A, van Hilten J. A comprehensive model of health-related quality of life in Parkinson¡¦s disease. Journal of Neurology 2008;255:1580-7. 8. Schrag A, Jahanshahi M, Quinn N. What contributes to quality of life in patients with Parkinson's disease? Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry 2000;69:308. 9. Hely M, Morris J, Reid W, Trafficante R. Sydney Multicenter Study of Parkinson's disease: non-L-dopa-responsive problems dominate at 15 years. Movement Disorders 2005;20:190-9. 10. Dibble L, Addison O, Papa E. The effects of exercise on balance in persons with Parkinson's disease: a systematic review across the disability spectrum. Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy 2009;33:14. 11. Goodwin V, Richards S, Taylor R, Taylor A, Campbell J. The effectiveness of exercise interventions for people with Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Movement Disorders 2008;23:631-40. 12. Chen C, Yeung K, Bih L, Wang C, Chen M, Chien J. The relationship between sitting stability and functional performance in patients with paraplegia. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2003;84:1276-81. 13. Sprigle S, Maurer C, Holowka M, Sprigle S, Maurer C, Holowka M. Development of valid and reliable measures of postural stability. J Spinal Cord Med 2007;30:40-9. 14. Tsang YL, Mak MK. Sit-and-reach test can predict mobility of patients recovering from acute stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2004;85:94-8. 15. Dean C, Shepherd R. Task-related training improves performance of seated reaching tasks after stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Stroke 1997;28:722. 16. Dean C, Channon E, Hall J. Sitting training early after stroke improves sitting ability and quality and carries over to standing up but not to walking: a randomised controlled trial. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy 2007;53:97. 17. Boswell-Ruys C, Harvey L, Barker J, Ben M, Middleton J, Lord S. Training unsupported sitting in people with chronic spinal cord injuries: a randomized controlled trial. Spinal Cord 2009. 18. Betker A, Desai A, Nett C, Kapadia N, Szturm T. Game-based Exercises for Dynamic Short-Sitting Balance Rehabilitation of People With Chronic Spinal Cord and Traumatic Brain Injuries. Physical Therapy 2007;87:1389. 19. Mudie M, Winzeler-Mercay U, Radwan S, Lee L. Training symmetry of weight distribution after stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study comparing task-related reach, Bobath and feedback training approaches. Clinical Rehabilitation 2002;16:582. 20. Deutsch J, Borbely M, Filler J, Huhn K, Guarrera-Bowlby P. Use of a low-cost, commercially available gaming console (Wii) for rehabilitation of an adolescent with cerebral palsy. Physical Therapy 2008;88:1196. 21. Nieuwboer A, Rochester L, Muncks L, Swinnen S. Motor learning in Parkinson's disease: limitations and potential for rehabilitation. Parkinsonism & Related Disorders 2009;15:S53-S8. 22. Holden MK, Holden MK. Virtual environments for motor rehabilitation: review. Cyberpsychology & Behavior 2005;8:187-211; discussion 2-9. 23. Brooks B, Rose F. The use of virtual reality in memory rehabilitation: current findings and future directions. NeuroRehabilitation 2003;18:147-57. 24. Adamovich S, Fluet G, Tunik E, Merians A. Sensorimotor training in virtual reality: A review. NeuroRehabilitation 2009;25:29-44. 25. 朱育秀, 湯佩芳, 胡名霞. 虛擬實境於中風病患步行與平衡能力訓練之應用. 物理治療 2008;33:121-8. 26. Thornton M, Marshall S, McComas J, Finestone H, McCormick A, Sveistrup H. Benefits of activity and virtual reality based balance exercise programmes for adults with traumatic brain injury: perceptions of participants and their caregivers. Brain Inj 2005;19:989-1000. 27. Sveistrup H, McComas J, Thornton M, Marshall S, Finestone H, McCormick A et al. Experimental studies of virtual reality-delivered compared to conventional exercise programs for rehabilitation. Cyberpsychology & Behavior 2003;6:245-9. 28. Dean C, Shepherd R, Adams R. Sitting balance I: trunk-arm coordination and the contribution of the lower limbs during self-paced reaching in sitting. Gait Posture 1999;10:135-46. 29. Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott MH. Motor control: Translating Research into Clinical Practice Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007. 30. Bouisset S, Do M. Posture, dynamic stability, and voluntary movement. Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology 2008;38:345-62. 31. Visser J, Carpenter M, van der Kooij H, Bloem B. The clinical utility of posturography. Clinical Neurophysiology 2008;119:2424-36. 32. Wilson JR. Virtual environments and ergonomics: needs and opportunities. Ergonomics 1997;40:21. 33. Rose F, Attree E, Johnson D. Virtual reality: an assistive technology in neurological rehabilitation. Current opinion in neurology 1996;9:461. 34. Winter DA. Biomechanics and motor control of human movement. Hoboken, N.J. :: John Wiley & Sons; 2005. 35. Sev ek F. Shape analysis of postural sway area. ICBME Proceedings, v tisku 2008. 36. Maurer C, Peterka R. A new interpretation of spontaneous sway measures based on a simple model of human postural control. Journal of neurophysiology 2005;93:189. 37. Verheyden G, Willems AM, Ooms L, Nieuwboer A, Verheyden G, Willems A-M et al. Validity of the trunk impairment scale as a measure of trunk performance in people with Parkinson's disease. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007;88:1304-8. 38. Lynch SM, Leahy P, Barker SP. Reliability of measurements obtained with a modified functional reach test in subjects with spinal cord injury. Physical Therpy 1998;78:128-33. 39. Katz-Leurer M, Fisher I, Neeb M, Schwartz I, Carmeli E. Reliability and validity of the modified functional reach test at the sub-acute stage post-stroke. Disability and Rehabilitation 2009;31:243-8. 40. Tyson SF, DeSouza LH. Reliability and validity of functional balance tests post stroke. Clinical Rehabilitation 2004;18:916-23. 41. Boswell-Ruys C, Sturnieks D, Harvey L, Sherrington C, Middleton J, Lord S. Validity and reliability of assessment tools for measuring unsupported sitting in people with a spinal cord injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2009;90:1571-7. 42. Nichols D, Miller L, Colby L, Pease W. Sitting balance: its relation to function in individuals with hemiparesis. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1996;77:865-9. 43. Karatas G, Tosun A, Kanatl U. Center-of-pressure displacement during postural changes in relation to pressure ulcers in spinal cord-injured patients. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 2008;87:177. 44. Pollock A, Durward B, Rowe P, Paul J. What is balance? Clinical Rehabilitation 2000;14:402. 45. Zedka M, Kumar S, Narayan Y. Electromyographic response of the trunk muscles to postural perturbation in sitting subjects. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology 1998;8:3-10. 46. Forssberg H, Hirschfeld H. Postural adjustments in sitting humans following external perturbations: muscle activity and kinematics. Experimental Brain Research 1994;97:515-27. 47. Kaminski T, Bock C, Gentile A. The coordination between trunk and arm motion during pointing movements. Experimental Brain Research 1995;106:457-66. 48. Abbruzzese G, Berardelli A, Abbruzzese G, Berardelli A. Sensorimotor integration in movement disorders. Movement Disorders 2003;18:231-40. 49. Horak F. Postural orientation and equilibrium: what do we need to know about neural control of balance to prevent falls? Age and ageing 2006;35. 50. Peterka R. Sensorimotor integration in human postural control. Journal of neurophysiology 2002;88:1097. 51. Visser J, Bloem B. Role of the basal ganglia in balance control. Neural plasticity 2005;12:161. 52. Boonstra T, van der Kooij H, Munneke M, Bloem B. Gait disorders and balance disturbances in Parkinson's disease: clinical update and pathophysiology. Current opinion in neurology 2008;21:461. 53. Horak F, Dimitrova D, Nutt J. Direction-specific postural instability in subjects with Parkinson's disease. Experimental Neurology 2005;193:504-21. 54. Vaugoyeau M, Viel S, Assaiante C, Amblard B, Azulay JP. Impaired vertical postural control and proprioceptive integration deficits in Parkinson's disease. Neuroscience 2007;146:852-63. 55. Smiley-Oyen AL, Cheng HY, Latt LD, Redfern MS. Adaptation of vibration-induced postural sway in individuals with Parkinson's disease. Gait and Posture 2002;16:188-97. 56. Dietz V. Proprioception and locomotor disorders. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2002;3:781-90. 57. Nallegowda M, Singh U, Handa G, Khanna M, Wadhwa S, Yadav S et al. Role of sensory input and muscle strength in maintenance of balance, gait, and posture in Parkinson's disease: a pilot study. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 2004;83:898. 58. Rossi M, Soto A, Santos S, Sesar A, Labella T. A Prospective Study of Alterations in Balance among Patients with Parkinson¡¦s Disease. European neurology 2009;61:171-6. 59. Valkovic P, Krafczyk S, Saling M, Benetin J, Botzel K. Postural reactions to neck vibration in Parkinson's disease. Movement Disorders 2006;21:59-65. 60. Benatru I, Vaugoyeau M, Azulay J. Postural disorders in Parkinson¡¦s disease. Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology 2008;38:459-65. 61. Bridgewater K, Sharpe M. Trunk muscle performance in early Parkinson's disease. Physical Therapy 1998;78:566. 62. Schenkman M, Morey M, Kuchibhatla M. Spinal flexibility and balance control among community-dwelling adults with and without Parkinson's disease. Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological and Medical Sciences 2000;55:441. 63. Schenkman M, Shipp K, Chandler J, Studenski S, Kuchibhatla M. Relationships between mobility of axial structures and physical performance. Physical Therapy 1996;76:276. 64. Wright W, Gurfinkel V, Nutt J, Horak F, Cordo P. Axial hypertonicity in Parkinson's disease: direct measurements of trunk and hip torque. Experimental Neurology 2007;208:38-46. 65. Falvo M, Schilling B, Earhart G. Parkinson's disease and resistive exercise: rationale, review, and recommendations. Movement disorders: official journal of the Movement Disorder Society 2008;23:12. 66. Cholewicki J, Polzhofer G, Radebold A. Postural control of trunk during unstable sitting. Journal of biomechanics 2000;33:1733-7. 67. van der Burg J, van Wegen E, Rietberg M, Kwakkel G, van Dieen J. Postural control of the trunk during unstable sitting in Parkinson's disease. Parkinsonism and Related Disorders 2006;12:492-8. 68. Horak F, Nutt J, Nashner L. Postural inflexibility in parkinsonian subjects. Journal of the Neurological Sciences 1992;111:46-58. 69. Schmidt RA. Motor control and learning. Champaign, IL :: Human Kinetics; 2005. 70. Sveistrup H. Motor rehabilitation using virtual reality. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 2004;1:10. 71. 胡名霞. 動作控制與動作學習. 第二版 ed.: 金名圖書有限公司; 2006. 72. Rensink M, Schuurmans M, Lindeman E, Hafsteinsdottir T. Task-oriented training in rehabilitation after stroke: systematic review. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2009;65:737-54. 73. Morris M. Movement disorders in people with Parkinson disease: a model for physical therapy. Physical Therapy 2000;80:578. 74. Keus SHJ, Munneke M, Nijkrake MJ, Kwakkel G, Bloem BR. Physical Therapy in Parkinson's Disease: Evolution and Future Challenges. Movement Disorders 2009;24:1-14. 75. Mak M, Hui-Chan C. Cued task-specific training is better than exercise in improving sit-to-stand in patients with Parkinson's disease: a randomized controlled trial. Movement Disorders 2008;23:501-9. 76. Ada L, Dean C, Mackey F. Increasing the amount of physical activity undertaken after stroke. Physical Therapy Reviews 2006;11:91-100. 77. Bayouk J, Boucher J, Leroux A. Balance training following stroke: effects of task-oriented exercises with and without altered sensory input. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research 2006;29:51. 78. Huang H, Wolf S, He J. Recent developments in biofeedback for neuromotor rehabilitation. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 2006;3:11. 79. Srivastava A, Taly A, Gupta A, Kumar S, Murali T. Post-stroke balance training: Role of force platform with visual feedback technique. Journal of the Neurological Sciences 2009. 80. Nichols D. Balance retraining after stroke using force platform biofeedback. Physical Therapy 1997;77:553. 81. Mazuryk T, Gervautz M. Virtual reality history, applications, technology and future. Institute of Computer Graphics, Vienna University of Technology, Austria. 82. Tarr MJ, Warren WH, Tarr MJ, Warren WH. Virtual reality in behavioral neuroscience and beyond. Nat Neurosci 2002;5 Suppl:1089-92. 83. Kenyon RV, Leigh J, Keshner EM. Considerations for the future development of virtual technology as a rehabilitation tool. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 2004;1:10. 84. Ku J, Mraz R, Baker N, Zakzanis KK, Lee JH, Kim IY et al. A data glove with tactile feedback for FMRI of virtual reality experiments. Cyberpsychology & Behavior 2003;6:497-508. 85. Lott A, Bisson E, Lajoie Y, McComas J, Sveistrup H, Lott A et al. The effect of two types of virtual reality on voluntary center of pressure displacement. Cyberpsychology & Behavior 2003;6:477-85. 86. Rose FD, Attree EA, Brooks BM, Johnson DA. Virtual environments in brain damage rehabilitation: a rationale from basic neuroscience. Stud Health Technol Inform 1998;58:233-42. 87. Chuang TY, Sung WH, Chang HA, Wang RY, Chuang T-Y, Sung W-H et al. Effect of a virtual reality-enhanced exercise protocol after coronary artery bypass grafting. Physical Therapy 2006;86:1369-77. 88. You S, Jang S, Kim Y, Hallett M, Ahn S, Kwon Y et al. Virtual reality-induced cortical reorganization and associated locomotor recovery in chronic stroke: an experimenter-blind randomized study. Stroke 2005;36:1166. 89. Jang SH, You SH, Hallett M, Cho YW, Park CM, Cho SH et al. Cortical reorganization and associated functional motor recovery after virtual reality in patients with chronic stroke: an experimenter-blind preliminary study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005;86:2218-23. 90. Selzer ME. Textbook of neural repair and rehabilitation. New York :: Cambridge University Press; 2006. 91. Sandin KJ, Smith BS. The measure of balance in sitting in stroke rehabilitation prognosis. Stroke 1990;21:82-6. 92. Kerr HM, Eng JJ, Kerr HM, Eng JJ. Multidirectional measures of seated postural stability. Clin Biomech 2002;17:555-7. 93. Treaster D, Marras W. Measurement of seat pressure distributions. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 1987;29:563-75. 94. Aissaoui R, Boucher C, Bourbonnais D, Lacoste M, Dansereau J. Effect of seat cushion on dynamic stability in sitting during a reaching task in wheelchair users with paraplegia* 1. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2001;82:274-81. 95. Anne Fenety P, Putnam C, Walker J. In-chair movement: validity, reliability and implications for measuring sitting discomfort. Applied Ergonomics 2000;31:383-93. 96. Powell E, Pyburn R, Hill E, Smith K, Ribbands M, Mickelborough J et al. Measurement of sitting balance using the Manchester Active Position Seat (MAPS): a feasibility study. Clinical Rehabilitation 2002;16:661. 97. Stinson M, Porter-Armstrong A, Eakin P. Pressure mapping systems: reliability of pressure map interpretation. Clinical Rehabilitation 2003;17:504. 98. Olsson K, Blomkvist A, Beckung E. Pressure mapping as a complement in clinical sitting analysis in children during activity. Advances in Physiotherapy 2008;10:76-84. 99. Hoehn M, Yahr M. Parkinsonism: Onset, progression and mortality. Neurology 2001;57:S11-S26. 100. Adler CH, Ahlskog JE. Parkinson's disease and movement disorders. Humana press; 2000. 101. Steffen T, Seney M. Test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change on balance and ambulation tests, the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey, and the Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale in people with parkinsonism. Physical Therapy 2008;88:733. 102. Folstein M, Folstein S, McHugh P. Mini-Mental State: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research 1975;12:189-98. 103. 郭乃文, 劉秀枝, 王珮芳, 徐道昌. 中文版[簡短式智能評估](MMSE) 之簡介. 臨床醫學 1989;23:39-42. 104. Murden R, McRae T, Kaner S, Bucknam M. Mini-Mental State exam scores vary with education in blacks and whites. J Am Geriatr Soc 1991;39:149-55. 105. Verheyden G, Nieuwboer A, Mertin J, Preger R, Kiekens C, De Weerdt W. The Trunk Impairment Scale: a new tool to measure motor impairment of the trunk after stroke. Clinical Rehabilitation 2004;18:326. 106. Duncan PW, Weiner DK, Chandler J, Studenski S. Functional reach: a new clinical measure of balance. J Gerontol 1990;45:M192-7. 107. Thompson M, Medley A. Forward and lateral sitting functional reach in younger, middle-aged, and older adults. J Geriatr Phys Ther 2007;30:43-8. 108. Bartlett D, Birmingham T. Validity and reliability of a pediatric reach test. Pediatric physical therapy 2003;15:84-92. 109. Berg K. Measuring balance in the elderly: preliminary development of an instrument. Physiotherapy Canada 1989;41:304-11. 110. Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The timed' Up & Go': a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc 1991;39:142. 111. Peto V, Jenkinson C, Fitzpatrick R. PDQ-39: a review of the development, validation and application of a Parkinson's disease quality of life questionnaire and its associated measures. Journal of Neurology 1998;245:10-4. 112. Marinus J, Ramaker C, Van Hilten J, Stiggelbout A. Health related quality of life in Parkinson's disease: a systematic review of disease specific instruments. British Medical Journal 2002;72:241. 113. Ma H, Hwang W, Chen-Sea M. Reliability and validity testing of a Chinese-translated version of the 39-item Parkinson¡¦s Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39). Quality of Life Research 2005;14:565-9. 114. Bisson E, Contant B, Sveistrup H, Lajoie Y. Functional balance and dual-task reaction times in older adults are improved by virtual reality and biofeedback training. Cyberpsychology & Behavior 2007;10:16-23. 115. Leroux A, Pinet H, Nadeau S. Task-oriented intervention in chronic stroke: changes in clinical and laboratory measures of balance and mobility. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 2006;85:820. 116. Lafond D, Corriveau H, Hebert R, Prince F. Intrasession reliability of center of pressure measures of postural steadiness in healthy elderly people1. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2004;85:896-901. 117. Bryanton C, Bosse J, Brien M, McLean J, McCormick A, Sveistrup H. Feasibility, motivation, and selective motor control: virtual reality compared to conventional home exercise in children with cerebral palsy. Cyberpsychology & Behavior 2006;9:123-8. 118. Verheyden G, Vereeck L, Truijen S, Troch M, LaFosse C, Saeys W et al. Additional Exercises Improve Trunk Performance: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 2009;23:281-6. 119. Lim L, van Wegen E, de Goede C, Jones D, Rochester L, Hetherington V et al. Measuring gait and gait-related activities in Parkinson's patients own home environment: a reliability, responsiveness and feasibility study. Parkinsonism & Related Disorders 2005;11:19-24. 120. Stokes E. How much change is true change? The minimum detectable change of the Berg Balance Scale in elderly people. J Rehabil Med 2009;41:343-6. 121. Peto V, Jenkinson C, Fitzpatrick R. Determining minimally important differences for the PDQ-39 Parkinson's disease questionnaire. Age and ageing 2001;30:299. 122. Vernazza-Martin S, Martin N, Pellec-Muller A, Tricon V, Massion J. Kinematic synergy adaptation to an unstable support surface and equilibrium maintenance during forward trunk movement. Experimental Brain Research 2006;173:62-78. 123. Wu T, Hallett M. Neural correlates of dual task performance in patients with Parkinson's disease. British Medical Journal 2008;79:760. 124. Wulf G, Landers M, Lewthwaite R, Tollner T. External focus instructions reduce postural instability in individuals with Parkinson disease. Physical Therapy 2009;89:162. 125. Dietz V, Duysens J. Significance of load receptor input during locomotion: a review. Gait Posture 2000;11:102-10. 126. Messier J, Adamovich S, Jack D, Hening W, Sage J, Poizner H. Visuomotor learning in immersive 3D virtual reality in Parkinson¡¦s disease and in aging. Experimental Brain Research 2007;179:457-74. 127. Alves G, Larsen J, Emre M, Wentzel-Larsen T, Aarsland D. Changes in motor subtype and risk for incident dementia in Parkinson's disease. Movement Disorders 2006;21:1123-30. 128. Williams L, Seignourel P, Crucian G, Okun M, Rodriguez R, Skidmore F et al. Laterality, region, and type of motor dysfunction correlate with cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease. Movement Disorders 2007;22:141-4. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/22241 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 前言與背景:相較於健康人,巴金森氏症(巴病)患者不良的軀幹柔軟度和肌力可能造成其坐姿控制不佳,尤其在不穩定的坐姿平面上表現出較大的身體晃動以及比較少的軀幹旋轉動作。過去的文獻對神經疾患病人坐姿平衡的治療,支持任務取向模式(task-oriented approach)以及生物回饋(biofeedback)的訓練效果。由於虛擬實境(virtual reality)於互動式的虛擬情境中提供即時回饋,可激發使用者重複練習功能性動作,所以本研究採用新設計之虛擬實境系統包含一互動式坐姿平衡板及模擬日常生活室內、室外活動的虛擬情境,應用於巴金森氏症病患的坐姿平衡訓練。目的:本研究第一個目的是比較六週虛擬實境訓練相較於傳統坐姿平衡訓練於坐姿壓力分佈、功能表現及生活品質之影響,並分析訓練後兩週的維持效果。第二個目的是分析訓練時不同情境下坐姿平衡板合併虛擬實境系統之即時壓力分布與壓心(center of pressure)改變。方法:本研究為施測者單盲的設計,在台大醫院收集侯葉(H-Y)分級3的原發性巴金森氏症病患,以隨機分層方式將病患分至「虛擬實境組」(VR group, n=15)或「傳統訓練組」(CB group, n=14),分別由物理治療師提供6週(2次/週,40分鐘/次)的治療介入。每位個案在介入前、後及兩週後追蹤期接受坐姿壓力分佈測試及臨床評估測試,包含軀幹機能損傷程度、改良式功能性前伸測試、柏格式平衡量表、計時起走測試及巴金森生活品質量表。虛擬實境系統的即時壓力分析則是採用壓力測試板記錄巴病患者在同一虛擬實境軟體情境,以及不同軟體情境的壓力分布與壓心的即時反應。本研究使用的統計為雙項混合變異數分析檢驗兩組的訓練效果,雙項重複及單項重複變異數分析檢驗即時反應;若有差異,則使用事後分析檢定兩組的差異。統計上顯著差異水平定為0.05。結果:(1) 六週虛擬實境及傳統坐姿訓練皆無法增進靜態坐姿穩定性及對稱性;但是兩組在訓練後皆顯著增加最大重心位移量,並維持訓練效果至兩週追蹤期,但兩組組間無差異。(2) 兩組訓練組在軀幹損傷程度、改良式功能性前伸測試、柏格式平衡量表都有顯著的短期及兩週的維持療效;但兩組亦無差異。(3) 在同一虛擬實境軟體,不穩定的坐姿平面需花費更多時間完成任務;而當雙手握球時,前後方向的壓心位移量顯著多於無手部動作情境。(4) 不同的軟體間,步行”walk”在前後方向的最大壓心位移量顯著大於廚房煮菜“cooking”, 洗晾衣服“washing”, 整理書架“book arrangement”,代表軟體間有差異性的設計。結論:六週虛擬實境訓練及傳統坐姿平衡訓練皆可促進巴金森氏症病患在動態平衡的壓力分佈、軀幹控制能力、及功能性平衡的能力。而虛擬實境訓練,病患控制壓心的改變與虛擬情境互動,透過外在操作設計及不同的虛擬情境內容達到訓練的目的,其效果與傳統坐姿平衡訓練無顯著差異。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Introduction and Background: Compared with healthy individuals, patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD) demonstrated greater body sway and less trunk movement to maintain stability when sitting on an unstable surface. The trunk inflexibility and weakness may be involved in poor sitting balance in PD. Previous studies supported the effects of combined training with task-oriented approach and biofeedback in neurological patients. The virtual reality (VR) applications are suggested to provide real-time feedback in interactive virtual environments, and can motivate users to practice the simulated tasks repetitively. Thus, a newly VR-based system, including a interactive balance board and software of simulated daily indoor/outdoor activities, is developed for sitting balance training in patients with PD. Objective: The primary purpose of this study was to compare the short term training effect and retention effect between VR-based sitting balance training group (VR group) and conventional sitting balance training group (CB group). The outcome measures included pressure distribution of sitting balance, functional balance and mobility tests, and quality of life in patients with PD. The secondary purpose was to examine the real-time pressure distribution during sitting balance training with the newly developed VR-based system. Method: In this single-blinded study, patients diagnosed as idiopathic PD (H-Y stage III) were recruited and randomly allocated into VR group (n=15) and CB group (n=14). Both groups received 6-week (2 sessions/week, 40 minutes/session) intervention by different physical therapists for each group. Each participant received assessments before (pre-), after intervention (post-) and at 2-week follow up (FU). The pressure distribution measurement (Zebris, PDM) was used to evaluate symmetry, steadiness, and maximal weight shift in sitting position, and the functional tests included Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS), Modified Functional Reach Test (MFRT), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Timed Up and Go (TUG) Test and Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire-39 item version (PDQ-39). Next, to evaluate the characteristics of VR-based training system, the real-time pressure distribution and center of pressure were recorded during VR-based balance training with the same or different VR-software modes. The two-way mixed ANOVA (2 groups x 3 times) was used to test the training effect, and the two-way and one-way repeated ANOVA were used to determine real-time effect of VR-based programs. If any main effect or interaction existed, the post-hoc tests with Bonferroni adjustments were used. An α level of 0.05 was used to determine significance for all statistical tests. Results: (1) Both VR and CB groups didn’t reveal significant differences on pressure distribution in symmetry and steadiness during static sitting. During dynamic maximal weight shift, both groups significantly improved the distances of COP excursion after training and maintained the improvement to follow up. (2) Both training groups showed significantly short term training effect and retention effect on trunk function (TIS) and balance activity (MFRT, BBS), but no significant difference was found between two training groups. (3) In the same VR mode, participants significantly increased the moving time while sitting on the soft surface and significantly increased COP excursion of AP direction with hand manipulation. (4) VR mode of “walking” had significantly larger COP excursions in AP direction than “cooking”, “washing” and “book arrangement”. Conclusion: Both the 6-week VR-based and conventional sitting balance trainings improved dynamic pressure distribution, trunk functions, and clinical balance measures. The newly developed VR-based seated balance system could be controlled by the weight shift with concurrent change of COP to interact with the virtual environment. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T04:14:14Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-99-R97428011-1.pdf: 4385717 bytes, checksum: 93c8ade71b5462ebbdc90b0cd67fcbf8 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 摘要 iii
Abstract v Introduction 1 1.1. Background 1 1.2. Purposes and Hypotheses 3 1.3. Operational Definition 5 Chapter 2: Literature Review 8 2.1. Postural Control in Sitting 8 2.2. Sitting balance in PD 9 2.3. Task-oriented Sitting Balance Training in Neurological Patients 13 2.4. Force Measurement with Kinetic Biofeedback System 15 2.5. Virtual Reality 17 2.6. Measurement of Sitting Balance: Pressure Measurement System 22 Chapter 3: Method 26 3.1. Participants 26 3.2. Study Design 26 3.3. Clinical Assessment 27 3.4. Experimental Equipments 31 3.5. Experimental Procedure 34 3.6. Data analysis 37 3.7. Statistics Analysis 38 Chapter 4: Results 40 4.1. Subjects Recruitment 40 4.2. Effects between VR and CB Balance Training 41 4.3. Analysis of VR-based Training Programs 43 Chapter 5: Discussion 45 5.1. Major Findings 45 5.2. Baseline Characteristics of Participants 46 5.3. Effects of Sitting Balance Training by ICF Model 47 5.4. Possible Training Mechanism of VR-based Training 52 5.5. Clinical Implication 57 5.6. Research Limitations and Future Research 58 Chapter 6: Conclusion 60 Reference 61 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 虛擬實境坐姿平衡訓練對巴金森氏症患者坐姿壓力分布與功能表現之影響 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Effects of Virtual Reality-Based Sitting Balance Training on Pressure Distribution and Functional Performance in Patients with Parkinson’s Disease | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 98-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 呂東武(Tung-Wu Lu),吳瑞美(Ruey-Meei Wu),胡名霞(Ming-Hsia Hu) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 巴金森氏症,虛擬實境,壓力分布, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Parkinson’s disease,Virtual reality,Pressure distribution, | en |
dc.relation.page | 120 | |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2010-08-13 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 醫學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 物理治療學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 物理治療學系所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-99-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 4.28 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。